/n/ - News

>>343824

>Hindu-Muslim race war, when?

Um the Hindu-Muslim race war has been going on since Muslims immigrated to those regions

The scene in batman The Dark Knight where Alfred explains that bandit in Burma was causing trouble for the locals he was referring to Rohingya Muslims that used to stir up shit all the time, I'm not even kidding.

Yet to this day the Rohingya Muslims are considered a persecuted minority despite the fact they are the problem.

←MFW

>How I learned to stop worrying and love the Pajeet

>>343907

Fucking this, Europe, India, America and Africa have been defined by how well (or in Afircas case, not so well) they could fight off the muslim hordes. Pakistan was split off from India because of the violence of the indian muslims. Europe has castles because of constant slave raids by muslim pirates and the borders of Europe were defined by which people were able to stop muslim expansion. Muslims were a problem from America after they achieved independence.

The Rohingya people are Indo-Aryan peoples from the Rakhine State, Myanmar, who speak the Rohingya language.[16][17] According to Rohingyas and some scholars, they are indigenous to Rakhine State, while other historians claim that they migrated to Myanmar from Bengal primarily during the period of British rule in Burma,[18][19][20] and to a lesser extent, after the Burmese independence in 1948 and Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971.

DEY BE ARYAN N SHEIT

Notice how they all squat instead of sitting, they must shit everywhere

>>343824

Pakis and arabs are genetically programmed to be criminals, and thats no reaching statement. Its simply a method of opportunism which is a core behaviour of nature. Nature is flush with similar examples.

The hanged pakis could have been petty thieves or pedo kid-nappers. Whatever, they were detected by alpha male hindus and given correct treatment.

Sad that europeans have been so brainwashed that they let pakis in en-mass and let them build huge harems of white child sex slaves.

> be me

> in town in england on nice day, town is busy

> standing watching a game of street chess

> paki and his 3 year old son come watch chess game too

> 3 year old kid walks up to my side

> I'm only half aware cos I'm watching game

> suddenly I realise the little shitskin has his hand on my pocket where my wallet is

> I turn to look at kid, he has thieving grin on his face

> paki pulls his kid back, and gives him very slight token admonishment

> kid doesn't notice

At that moment I realised pakis really do have a strong instinct to thieve.

All thru my early childhood I never had any such drive to steal like that, especially not when i was 3 years old.

It would have never occurred to me to try steal from a man, or that men have valuables in their pockets.

This kid wasn't old enough to have been taught, neither was he from a poor background. He simply did it on instinct

I stole a few sweets from the sweet shop when older, but felt guilt and fear so stopped doing it pretty quick.

That is why in the 1950s kikes selected pakis in particular to migrate en-mass into europe above all others and aside niggers.

They had been well known as genetic criminals for thousands of years ( e.g. Samaritans in the bible ). Kikes wanted to destabilize europe, so the needed criminals en-mass, not hard working conformists.

>>344732

>Mudslimes are the ones getting lynched instead of the other way around