/n/ - News

>youtube drama

>shilling

>no article, just lol 500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars500chars

>le kike maymay

>headline is in incomprehensible Newspeak that looks like /r9k/'s word filter from April Fools' Day

Congratulations OP, you fucked up just about everything you reasonably could be expected to. Good work.

>>345234

news

n(y)ooz/

noun

noun: news

newly received or noteworthy information, especially about recent or important events.

"I've got some good news for you"

a broadcast or published report of news.

plural noun: the news

"he was back in the news again"

synonyms: report, announcement, story, account; More

article, news flash, newscast, headlines, press release, communication, communiqué, bulletin;

news crawl, news ticker;

message, dispatch, statement, intelligence;

disclosure, revelation, word, talk, gossip;

informalscoop;

literarytidings

"they were stunned by the news of his death"

informal

information not previously known to someone.

"this was hardly news to her"

>>345240

>incomprehensible Newspeak

>kikes are okay

Back to Reddit with you, newfag

>>345245

>2 entertainers/meme creaters with over 1 million subs each

>not important

>not noteworthy

Cultureless faggot detected

>>345254

>ignore

>not BTFO

wew

>>345243

>everybody who disagrees with me is a reddit newfag

>>345250

>two meme creators

>I refuse to tell you who the fuck they are or why you should give a rat's ass

>a million subs

so I should create a thread about it here every time PewDiePie takes a shit? Or every time some random nobody who does LPs of obscure vidya picks lint from their genitals?

>>345252

>dictionary definition of news, no explanation of how that fits in this category

Leafy is a cutie though.

>Coming home after a long day at work

>35C (95f for amerifats) outside

>Open the front door, feeling to cool air from the aircon

>Walk into bedroom and see the computer is on

>Calvin must've been editing his stupid youtube videos

>Walk into living room

>Kitchen is cleaned and house vacuumed

>Calvin is naked on the couch, taking a nap

>His hairless bubble but makes your mouth water

>He starts moaning as you rim him

>You get to fuck your cutie twink boyfriend every day after work

>>345263

>I refuse to tell you who the fuck they are or why you should give a rat's ass

Educate yourself. They're very popular.

>so I should create a thread about it here every time PewDiePie takes a shit?

No, but you should create a thread if he goes to war with another big youtuber, like Onision.

>>345264

>I'm a SJW faggot and free speech is bad

>>345265

see

>>345250

>>345270

>it's not my job to educate you

that sounds familiar…

also

>learning about two e-celebs on youtube

>educating

>Onision

literally who?

>everybody who thinks my pet youtube channel isn't news is against free speech

>shut the fuck up you hateful assholes

kek, this sounds really fucking familiar…

>I think you should make PewDiePie threads

pic rel8d

>>345273

>le joo meme

>muh online lynch mob

do you speak any other languages than Alarmist Bullshit and Dank Memes?

>>345277

>that sounds familiar…

That's because it's a joke, you fucking retard.

Seriously, though. Look it up.

>learning about two e-celebs on youtube isn't educating

Kek

>Onision

>literally who?

Famous jewtuber. L2context or educate yourself

>everybody who thinks my pet youtube channel isn't news is against free speech

Actually, everyone who reports my thread is against free speech, since they're trying to hinder my free speech.

>shut the fuck up you hateful assholes

>kek, this sounds really fucking familiar…

Except i never said that. ;^)

>>345279

>le x meme

>muh y

>not memespeak

>do you speak any other languages than Alarmist Bullshit and Dank Memes?

Nice hypocrisy, bruh

>>345287

>Meme makers

>NOT noteworthy

By very definition, that's bullshit.

Also

>calling out bullshit makes you autistic

Kek

>I'm not laughing with you

When did I claim you were laughing at all? You seem pretty upset.

>projecting much?

Nope. Back to reddit with you.

>please, the only thing you can BTFO at this point is your brains.

>comebacks

>leafy sub

12 year old detected

>>345292

>not knowing 'not that it's my job to educate you' is tumblr-tier SJW shit

>not knowing that's the joke

>you told me to stop excercising my freedom of speech to disagree with you ;^)

Where did I tell you that, and where did I say, "shut the fuck up you hateful assholes"?

>then by that logic this is free speech and objecting to me shitting on your designated shit thread is hindering my free speech

Spam isn't free speech. Enjoy your ban

>>345302

News

>>345306

Maybe you should look at some of the other threads. On the increasingly-slim chance you're not retarded, you will notice that they are not about e-celebs. Somebody could take a picture of the shit they just took and call it news, that wouldn't make it any more relevant or newsworthy.

>I win because I have a pic of somebody looking smug

>I'm smarter than you

>educate yourself pleb

>You don't know the internet well

>nothin personal, kid

this isn't news.

>>345314

>Maybe you should look at some of the other threads.

>On the increasingly-slim chance you're not retarded, you will notice that they are not about e-celebs.

Okay ;^)

>The guy behind the Fappening, Donald Trump, Milo Yimminopolus, Anonymous

Seems to me like you're full of shit.

>Somebody could take a picture of the shit they just took and call it news, that wouldn't make it any more relevant or newsworthy.

But this isn't a piece of shit. These are two popular YouTubers feuding.

>>345319

Thank you for acknowledging the truth

>>345332

>The guy behind the Fappening, Donald Trump, Milo Yimminopolus, Anonymous

>Guy partially responsible for 4chan exodus, presidential candidate, journalist, political movement

are your youtube celebs any of those? because then this will be news.

>But this isn't a piece of shit. These are two popular YouTubers feuding

Those two non-newsworthy things both do not affect me personally at all. Therefore they are in the same category: non-news. also all youtube 'celebrities' a shit

>>345341

>are your youtube celebs any of those?

No-no. Hush, now. You said "e-celebs," not youtube celebs. Youtube celebs are e-celebs, just like the people I mentioned.

>Those two non-newsworthy things both do not affect me personally at all.

Apparently it does, since you're responding to a thread about it.

>also all youtube 'celebrities' a shit

Waaaah stop liking things I don't like

>this thread

>>345348

>>345349

>>345363

I wish

>>345229

This isn't really news, but it did get me to unsubscribe from h3h3

I thought his older shit was funny, but now he's just acting like a dumbass JewTube white knight, sicking his pewdiepie tier autistic "army" on anyone he finds "problematic." Guess what, the internet brings out the asshole in people. That's just how it is. He needs to stop bitching about this fact that will never go away.

I'm getting tired of all this pointless internet drama.

>>345362

>if they're also famous on the internet, they're e-celebs

Incorrect again. E-celebs are only e-famous. Regular famous people (journalists, politicians, protest groups) make the news on real news sites by doing things that actually affect people and are relevant. Also, celeb (e- or regular) goss is usually not considered news here.

>your responding

Ya got me. I admit it. I don't have anything better to do at the moment than shit on your designated shitting thread. I'm bored and your retardation is entertaining.

>>345375

>y no sage?

>>>/cow/

>>>/out/

Share those Smugs on out

>>345401

smug thread? smug thread.

>>345370

>Incorrect again. E-celebs are only e-famous.

Nope, every famous person on the internet is an E-celeb. Kys fam

>Regular famous people (journalists, politicians, protest groups) make the news on real news sites by doing things that actually affect people and are relevant.

All news cites are on the internet, and news sites affect people far less than Pewdiepie.

>I'm bored and your retardation is entertaining.

Pic related ;^)

>youtube drama

> on /n/

wew

>>345410

>Nope, every famous person on the internet is an E-celeb.

Looked it up, choice of words was poor since it turns out the term 'E-celebs' doesn't have a dictionary definition to beat you over the head with. Whenever I've heard it used before reading your idiocy, it has been synonymous with the terms 'E-famous' and 'Internet Celebrity' but I suspect you know what the fuck I meant, you tricky trickster.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Internet+Celebrity

https://encyclopediadramatica.se/E-famous

>All news cites are on the internet, and news sites affect people far less than Pewdiepie.

News sites don't affect people. They report on things that do. Things that do a lot more than PewDiePie or whoever these two faggots are whose dicks you're riding. Again, you split hairs and again you bollocks it up.

this isn't news

>>345424

>Looked it up, choice of words was poor since it turns out the term 'E-celebs' doesn't have a dictionary definition to beat you over the head with.

At least you'll admit you're full of sh-

Oh wait, you're going to try rationalize it, aren't you?

>Whenever I've heard it used before reading your idiocy, it has been synonymous with the terms 'E-famous' and 'Internet Celebrity'

In other words, my definition. ;^)

>but I suspect you know what the fuck I meant, you tricky trickster.

Of course I did. There is no word for your definition. Come up with another one.

Also

>relying on ED for definitions

Wew

>News sites don't affect people.

So, reporters aren't celebs by your very definition.

>They report on things that do.

Like Trump's antics, Kim Kardasian's ass and muh soggy knees in video games? XD

>Again, you split hairs and again you bollocks it up.

-says the faggot that gets triggered over one thread in the catalog

>>345229

Who is this low test high estrogen LOW ENERGY faggot and why should anyone care?

>>345254

>>>/somethingawful/

>>345923

Because he is rapidly becoming the fun police on youtube. If you dare make a joke that triggers him, he'll send his million subscribers on you.

Humor has no morals, and someone less beta than leafy should publically embarasss him.

>>346070

>send his subscribers after you

How does that work? Do they climb through the target's screen or something? Wow they raid other people's forums or comments sections, truly an unprecedented act of barbarity.

>>346088

>Leafy lost thousands of subscribers a mattee od hours after thd video was released. A smaller channel would be destroyed.

If somebody's channel or life or sanity falls apart because of words (other than a spy being caught or somebody's PIN number or something), it is flimsy and free speech I don't think should be restricted to protect it.

>He managed to destroy two larger channels for making pranks.

How? By filing a false DMCA or content violation claim? By getting their E-begging site to lock them out? By DDOSing them?

>Fuck off to tumblr

everybody who disagrees with you is redditor leftypol commie feminazi SJWFBICOINTELPRONSAWTFBBQ from tumblr, and needs to leave this website that you personally own

>if you think no fun allowed lynch mobs are acceptable.

I think they're unacceptable if somebody gets lynched or blacklisted or v& irl, or something of that severity. Has that happened?

>>346097

>If somebody's channel or life or sanity falls apart because of words (other than a spy being caught or somebody's PIN number or something), it is flimsy and free speech I don't think should be restricted to protect it.

His free speech is being restricted because of it.

>How? By filing a false DMCA or content violation claim? By getting their E-begging site to lock them out? By DDOSing them?

By sending their legions of moralfag fans to shame them into shutting up. SJWs don't need to do any of that. They're already the establishment.

>everybody who disagrees with you is redditor leftypol commie feminazi SJWFBICOINTELPRONSAWTFBBQ from tumblr, and needs to leave this website that you personally own

Pretty much. Remove yourself.

>I think they're unacceptable if somebody gets lynched or blacklisted or v& irl, or something of that severity.

You're standards are shit, then, and your opinion has no weight. Have a doubleplusgood day. ;^)

>>346143

>SJW vs non SJW

>equally shitty

da jooz