No.348244
Cruz campaign puts out nudez of Trump's wife
While the results were still coming in from out west, things got personal on Twitter between Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. It began when Trump called out Cruz for a negative campaign ad featuring a nude photo of his wife, Melania.
Trump called out Cruz and threatened to “spill the beans” on his wife, Heidi Cruz. Trump did not go into detail about what he was referring to “spilling the beans” about.
Cruz responded with a tweet of his own denying that his campaign had put out the negative ad featuring Melania. He said Trump was “more of a coward than I thought” if he goes after his wife. He ended his tweet with “#classless”.
Trump responded early Wednesday morning by calling Cruz “Lyin’ Ted”. It is not the first time Trump has called Cruz a liar during his campaign.
The ad featuring an old photo of Melania from a GQ photo shoot was released in Utah (which Cruz won with almost 70% of the vote) by an anti-Trump PAC, "Make America Awesome Again". The ad was targeted at Mormon women in the days leading up to the Utah primary.
Liz Mair, the head of the SuperPac who ran the ad, responded to Slate about their decision to run the ad:
>I’m excited to see self-described progressives and feminists doing the bidding of the Trump campaign. If I’d known this ad was going to create the furor it has, I wouldn’t have pulled the plug on two other, much more controversial ads we were considering in an effort to avoid rocking the boat too much. But, if people are determined to have a cow about this because of their own internal, unaddressed, throwback attitudes to what nudity on the part of a pretty lady connotes without literally looking at the broader picture, I may just go the whole hog and run those other ads, too. … I want to beat Donald Trump, who by the way has zero problem with attacking women who appear scantily-clad in men’s magazines,”
http://archive.is/SX0UF
No.348254
I'm about to support Trump more now. At least he didn't marry a monkey like Obama did.
No.348266
Looks like Trump was quick to retaliate.
Ted's probably jelly as fuck that his wife isn't as sexy.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/22/politics/ted-cruz-melania-trump-twitter-donald-trump-heidi/
yes I know its CNN. Calm your mantits
No.348270
>>348266
archive that shit, nig.
No.348276
>>348266
that's why you archive, you dumb nigger.
No.348282
>>348270
>>348276
http://archive.is/wMOwZ
Doesn't really have anything the OP's article doesn't, though, except this;
Heidi Cruz is a senior executive for Goldman Sachs, and took a leave from work in order to help her husband's campaign. She has become one of the campaign's most accomplished fundraisers.
The senator's wife hit back at Trump on the campaign trail in Wisconsin.
"Well, as you probably know by now, most of the things, many of the things others say are not based in reality," Heidi Cruz said.
"I have one job on this campaign, and it is to be helping Ted win this race. And it is, I think, the easiest job in the world, and that is to speak the truth: what I know about my husband, our family, myself," she added.
Heidi Cruz also denied the photo of Melania Trump came from the Cruz campaign.
"In no shape or form are we related to it," she said.
The Trump campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump previously has used Twitter to threaten the Ricketts family, which has financed a negative ad campaign against him.
No.348285
>>348244
>nudes
You can barely see the side of an areola. That's not fucking nudes, that's a naked model shot.
No.348286
So now, allegedly, nude photos have been leaked of Trumps wife (who was taking nude photos specifically for the public eye - not a big deal) AND his daughter (who was taking private photos and didn't consent for them to become public).
So the question is, where are all the fucking feminists who freaked out defending Amanda Todd and a Zoe Quinn (one who had pics released without consent and one who released them with consent) screaming muhsoggyknees and foul play and victim shaming?
They've defended every other slut who displayed poor judgment and foresight of concequences - but not these two because they're closely related to Trump?
No.348290
this is choreographed kayfabe designed to make Trump look sympathetic.
No.348297
>>348286
Smart people hold others responsible for their actions. People who freak out over consenual nudes are far-left SJWs, they don't really care about women's rights or equal oppurtunity, they just care about being the victim, and will attack and defend whatever benefits them.
Haven't heard of the Ivanka (or Tiffany?) nudes, but if that's true, it's a horrible thing to do to release nudes given in private and whoever it was should be ashamed. Still, she knew it was a possibility when she took them, but that doesn't make it any better.
Regardless of the fact Melania gave consent and knew they would be out there, it's still a demeaning thing to do, and just looks like a low blow from Teddy. Wouldn't be half surprised if the 'third party PAC' is just some bullshit orchestrated for plausible deniability.
No.348314
Putting nudes of Obama's mother up didn't work
Putting nudes of Trump's wife won't either
Stay mad Republicucks your next president's wife is x20 times hotter than the pig you impregnated.
No.348318
>>348290
if this wasnt aired in utah you would be right, but uts utah and mormons arent sympathetic like that
>>348297
nothing you said is relevant to the comment, this is about the double standard. you have no standards though, you are just vacuous and you suck the life out of cultures by turning them upside down with double talk
>>348244
>liz meier
she is either intentionally destroying the gop or she is horrible at her job. the jeb people ruined jeb, then rubio, now they will ruin cruz…..what the fuck is going on with them?
No.348320
>>348297
I'm just pointing out the selective hypocrisy is all.
I personally don't feel any pity whatsoever for anyone who chooses to do nudity as a career early on in life, only to have it come back around to bite them in the ass later on. The same way I don't pity someone who gets a neck tattoo at age 20 and complains they can't get a decent job at 35.
I also don't feel any sympathy for a stupid girl who takes nudes or allows nudes to be taken of herself that include the face in the shot. If you're going to take nudes, keep your face and distinguishing characteristics out of it. You're some kind of moron if you think those won't find their way out into the world eventually.
And Trump shouldn't be acting upset over old public nudes of his wife being re-circulated. If he ever intended to get into politics, he shouldn't have married a whore. If he never intended to get into politics until after they were married, he should have gone into it being fully aware that his wifes reputation would come up and been prepared to act unruffled when it did.
The only girls whose vaginas end up on the internet that I feel bad for is the victims of creepshots. Thats not the woman knowingly making a poor judgment call and choosing to take part in something with well known concequences. That's someone catching them completely unaware. THATS a dick move.
No.348322
>>348244
Anonymous said they'd do some major damage to drompf and crud. looks like they've started.
No.348323
Other than the horse face his wife is a serious milf.
No.348324
>>348320
Of course, if you're wearing a skirt with no panties in public, it's like you WANT to get peeped.
No.348325
>>348288
how do they make these anyways?
it seems pretty unrealistic since most people i've met hate hillary.
No.348328
>>348325
they may hate her, but compared to the republican leader, she's a goddess.
No.348331
of course, most of the folks i've talked to sides with bernie.
No.348332
>>348320
I know. It's their fault in the end but it still makes the person who released them look bad imo.
>I also don't feel any sympathy for a stupid girl who takes nudes or allows nudes to be taken of herself that include the face in the shot. If you're going to take nudes, keep your face and distinguishing characteristics out of it
Ofc, that's just common sense. But it's about putting your trust in your partner. You'd be stupid for trusting anyone with that of course but I still think they would be a bad person for breaking that trust.
>And Trump shouldn't be acting upset over old public nudes of his wife being re-circulated.
He definitely would've looked stronger if he had just gone like "She released them willingly, who cares? You have a problem with women using their bodies?" or something. But then again imagine how some voters who are husbands would react if he didn't care at all. I mean, you gotta show you care about your wife's dignity just a bit right
No.348334
>>348325
Don't think anecdotal evidence counts for much. Maybe you live in a right wing area?
No.348335
>>348325
>>348331
The bottom odds make no sense because they are contingent on Bernie still being in the race and Trump having 77% in a 3 person race while Clinton has 97%. When Bernie is out and it's Trump vs Clinton, then we will see a different race. People are still shouting BERNIE when he cannot possibly win.
No.348338
>>348320
The main problem is that this has no place in intelligent public discourse. You can't hold a debate when your opponent's only response is CHECK OUT HIS WIFE'S TITS. Cruz could score major points in relatability and being a fucking person if he gets out ahead of this and denounces it as dirty tactics. He won't, partly because he's a greasy scumbag and partly because he doesn't actually want to be President, he's just putting on a show for his wife and his wife's major economic allies.
No.348339
>>348338
>Cruz could score major points in relatability and being a fucking person if he gets out ahead of this and denounces it as dirty tactics.
This. Dumbass thinks denouncing a single attack on Trump would be bad
No.348340
I think I know which one I'd rather fuck have as First Lady
No.348341
>>348338
Can he even be President? He's fucking Canadian
No.348344
>>348320
>And Trump shouldn't be acting upset over old public nudes of his wife being re-circulated. If he ever intended to get into politics, he shouldn't have married a whore.
>they are not nudes
>they are no more revealing than a bikini
>being a model does not make you a whore
>marrying an older billionaire does not make you a whore
this is why ted cruz is shit and society has gone to shit. cut the knee jerk bullshit out and do some thinking. CNN blacked out her chest shot even though there is no nipple in it, its intentionally deceitful and you are smearing a woman that is just an extremely hot model. fuck off with your alarmist feminism.
No.348358
>>348332
>Ofc, that's just common sense. But it's about putting your trust in your partner. You'd be stupid for trusting anyone with that of course but I still think they would be a bad person for breaking that trust.
It's naive as fuck to think that your partner is for life or that something won't happen in the future to make you both bitter and vengeful and not above using whatever ammo you have at your disposal against eachother. Or that a phone won't get lost and discovered by someone else complete with nude albums.
> "She released them willingly, who cares? You have a problem with women using their bodies?"
This is what should have been said.
>you gotta show you care about your wife's dignity just a bit right
Not if she didnt care about it when she posed for those pictures.
>>348344
I've been accused of a lot of silly shit, but of being an alarmist feminist - thats the strawberry on top of the silly shit cake.
No.348360
>>348358
>I've been accused of a lot of silly shit, but of being an alarmist feminist - thats the strawberry on top of the silly shit cake.
do you think her pictures are nudes? can you prove she is a whore?
No.348368
>>348358
>It's naive as fuck to think that your partner is for life
Naive, yes. I still envy people who think like that though. Hope is nice.
No.348372
>>348360
>Is she in a picture
Yes.
>Is she wearing clothes?
No.
She's nude in a picture, thats a nude picture.
>Is she a whore?
Well I suppose that depends on your idea of what constitutes whoring.
There's the universally accepted definition of having sex with people for money.
If you have sex with many people for a cash transaction you are indisputably a career whore.
If someone is paying you money to have sex exclusively with them, are you still a whore? Or something else that means the same thing but with a gentler title? Like a mistress.
Some people think that marrying someone because of their money isn't whoring. Hundreds of thousands marry for money. Is it further away from being whoring just because it's so typical? You might think so, but I don't.
Of course we can't prove she didn't marry him for his stellar personality and charm, and not his wealth. Just like we can't prove he didn't marry her for her brilliant mind and qualities that would make her a great mother, and not for her tits and sexy body. But that's what makes a gold digger good at what she does - never being undeniably a gold digger.
But of course the question here is not whether she is or isn't a whore. It's whether or not she and Trump have any right to feel outraged that slutty pictures she voluntarily had taken are publicly available in a time where that's inconvenient for them.
No.348374
And we thought Trump was a skeeze bag, Im deeply apologetic as a Canadian for unleashing this sack of dogshit named ted cruze on you America. Im so sorry.
No.348384
>>348374
We need a Canada border wall too to prevent this!
No.348387
>>348244
Seems like they chose an ad to beat Trump
>Biased
No.348398
>>348372
>She's nude in a picture, thats a nude picture.
no, she is not, the parts of her body that would be covered are parts that would be covered by a bathing suit, she isnt nude.
as far as the word "nudes" goes, those are not "nudes", welcome to the internet.
>But of course the question here is not whether she is or isn't a whore
you called her a whore so that is exactly what the question is. a gold digger and a whore are two different things, you called her a whore…..but you cant prove it.
congratulations on being a victim of newspeak.
No.348399
>>348394
i'd still hate fuck her, in the ass
No.348405
>>348398
>no, she is not
Yes she is. Do you have anything to go on saying she isn't aside from being pedantic?
> a gold digger and a whore are two different things
No they aren't.
No.348409
>>348405
Yes, they are two different things.
A whore is honest about her profession and is a respectable business for those who don't plan on getting married and having kids one day. Whores understand how men feel and try to help relieve that stress through both sensual and social/emotional methods.
A gold digger is a shady bitch who tries to steal people's money by manipulating them.
No.348412
>>348405
Nudes imply minimum nipples being shown, and typically a vag shot.
If neither the vag nor nipples are showing, it isn't "nudes," it's just naked modeling.
No.348415
No.348416
>>348409
They both get fucked for money.
>>348412
Nudes imply nudity.
nu·di·ty
ˈn(y)oodədē/
noun
the state or fact of being naked.
No.348417
>>348416
na·ked
ˈnākid/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or part of the body) without clothes.
No.348418
>>348323
>hoers face
>supermodel
pls
No.348419
>>348328
. . .
Pretty sure you made the wrong turn back at
>>>/tumblr/
No.348423
>>348405
>No they aren't.
yes they are.
>no nipple
>no vagina
>implying that is nude
and you have the nerve to call me pedantic, fuck off
No.348425
>>348417
that is naked not nudes
did some of you just find the internet?
No.348426
The argument over the definition of nude is pointless. It was a lewd image either way
No.348428
>>348416
>>348417
Look autist, just because you don't understand chan culture doesn't mean you get to flail around google definitions like they're the end-all of discussion.
Nudes have always referred to minimum nipples, usually nipples and vag, typically taken privately.
Naked photos have always referred to modeling photos and the like.
Go back to counting out your exact number of cheerios in your bowl of cereal, and fapping off like flipper boy, faggot.>>348417
No.348430
>>348423
>>348425
>>348428
You argue like a hysterical child.
No.348431
>>348430
Only one of those is me. Go back to your doritos and dew, faggot.
No.348432
>>348430
oh look, it is your first time here
No.348433
>>348428
>>348431
>>348432
>autist
>newfag
>lrn2internets
>theritosmountaindewww
Why don't you throw in a fedora and [current year] for good measure too? Since you're done pretending to have an actual argument.
No.348439
>>348399
>hate fuck
What is that? Rape?
No.348445
>>348433
Or i could just let you post about your own imaginary definitions of the words "whore" and "nudes" some more, since you seem to have issues with reality here.
No.348452
File: 1458769389524.jpg (101.1 KB, 638x617, 638:617, the_lorax___let___em_grow_….jpg)
>>348428
>muh epin chan cliture
>I am the lorax I speak for the imageboards
>they say ur ghey lolololol!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111
No.348453
>>348445
I have a published dictionary as citation for my definitions.
All you have is "thats not what it means on le chans tho!" which you still haven't provided any evidence for. And is silly and irrelevant anyways.
So while you're citing your claim about what the definition is within "chan culture" you can also explain to me why the definition you favor is more relevant than the globally accepted definition when we are talking about events that transpired outside of chans.
No.348467
>>348453
there you go again with your imaginary definitions. the sad thing is you arent even in on this scam. you see they say nude photos in utah because they know mormon women wont look at them and mormon men wont admit they looked at them, so they will never know they arent actually nude. this was lost on you though and you seem to think a woman covering herself with a towel, fur, tree leaves, or even a bathing suit is nude. this is because you are stupid.
No.348471
>>348439
It's when two people who hate each other's guts fuck out of mutual sexual tension. It's usually pretty savage.
It's very common among Conservative couples and mixed political couples.
No.348473
>>348467
To be nude is to be naked. To be naked is to be without clothes.
A bikini would be clothes. Not wearing any clothing is being naked, regardless of whether genitals are in view or obstructed by other items or by the position of the body.
Who views them in Utah, what those people think of viewing them, or what purpose was behind them being shown in Utah, is irrelevant to this discussion.
She is nude by every definition except for your own, which you still haven't cited.
You also haven't explained why the distinction is so important to you, or what bearing that distinction would have, or for that matter, what point you're driving at aside from whether she is or is not nude.
No.348474
>>348453
>And is silly and irrelevant anyways.
Not for you apparently.
No.348476
No.348479
>>348453
ignore >>348467, he's one of those assclowns that demands evidence, then says the sourced mainstream links you provide don't count as evidence because he says so. And le red allcaps of truth does. Breddy much the adult equivalent of that one kid we all knew growing up who would make up a game, then make up new rules whenever he started losing.
No.348481
>>348453
I'll cite urban dictionary, which is how most people view words.
>A picture of a girl where you can clearly see her breasts, nipples, legs, pussy or booty.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=nude+picture
No.348483
No.348486
>>348473
>You also haven't explained why the distinction is so important to you, or what bearing that distinction would have, or for that matter, what point you're driving at aside from whether she is or is not nude.
its a big deal to claim a woman has posted nudes, melania obviously hasnt. she is wearing fur in the picture, the fure is concealing her nipples and vagina, she is not nude.
by your definition a picture of some that only shows their nevk and face is a nude because there are no clothes in the picture. your definition is shit, and its blatantly wrong. its a big deal bc cruz is taking a cheap shot at trumps wofe because he paid a shiitu consultant named liz meier who has tanked every polotician she worked for so far.
check out my obama nude bro
No.348488
>>348479
yes ignore me and ignore reality, create your own world where you can make up your own words woth their own meanings to win arguments. when you lose to trump you can say the word lose actually means win. this way you will always win.
youll go as far as jeb bush with this attitude!
No.348491
>>348481
>>A picture of a girl where you can clearly see her breasts, nipples, legs, pussy or booty
In this picture, I can clearly see her breasts, legs, and the curvature, though not entirety of her booty.
Note the use of the word OR and not AND in the definition provided. Not all of those parts need be in view to be considered a nude, just one or some.
I also notice you conveniently cropped out some of the definition you used - specifically this part.
>A picture in which a pretty girl, or guy, can be seen naked.
I redirect you to the definition of naked, which is to be without clothing.
>>348486
>picture of some that only shows their nevk and face is a nude because there are no clothes in the picture
People don't wear clothing on their face and neck. Not in the U.S anyways. Everyones face and neck are nude. We would obviously not be discussing this if the picture in question were of Trumps wifes neck and face. Try to stay on relevant points.
I also never said Cruz wasn't taking a cheap shot. I said you should expect it after voluntarily participating in public nude photo shoots. It's silly to act taken aback by something that would obviously be used eventually.
No.348496
>>348488
Yes, Hitler, I'm the one ignoring reality. It can't possibly be that you're full of shit. :^)
No.348497
>>348491
>I also never said Cruz wasn't taking a cheap shot. I said you should expect it after voluntarily participating in public nude photo shoots. It's silly to act taken aback by something that would obviously be used eventually.
its not silly to be taken abavk by a blatant lie. they arent nude photos, she is wearing fur.
No.348499
>>348497
As another anon pointed out earlier on in the thread, whether or not we can come to an agreement about what constitutes a nude photo, the photo was lewd. The damage that has been done (if any) has been done on that basis.
No.348501
>>348491
Note that OR can be used as either an exclusive or, or as an and statement, logically speaking. The English language is fun like that.
No.348505
>>348499
the phot is actually classy and was taken in good taste. what is lewd is the lies that ted cruz has told and the way he is attacking grumps wife and spreading false rumors about her by claiming she posted nude, which she never did. ted cruz is a liar and has not revealed his ties with the bushs until now. the way he is going after a successful model is truly disgraceful, i happen to find the pictures very professional, only a pervert would call that lewd.
No.348508
>>348505
Oh, when I posted >>348426
I forgot lewd meant offensive too. I just meant sexual/provocative.
No.348510
>>348244
How does OPs image make anyone LESS likely to vote for Trump?
Of course the emperor should have a beautiful wife.
No.348515
>>348510
It was targetted at mormons. I guess they disapprove of that sort of thing? Prudes and all
No.348516
>>348505
Obviously what some consider to be tasteful others consider to be lewd.
The picture is available for anyone to see. If some or many of the people who see it deem that it is lewd and classless, no amount of pedantic bickering over the technicality of nude-or-not will fix that.You cannot change the opinions of the millions of people who might view this photo and decide to withdraw support for Trump or use it as venom against him based on their impressions upon viewing it.
Trump will be fine regardless so don't worry about it. The types of buttoned-down repressed individuals who would take exception to the repute of someone who models like this are not the types of people who would have supported someone as abrasive and womanizing as Trump in the first place. I don't think any voters will be swayed from their original position because of this photo.
It is a cheap shot on Cruz's part. But I'm sure an intelligent man like Trump knew perfectly well his wifes reputation and history would come under fire at some point. Its not like this is the first he is learning of her past endeavors. He should have been prepared for it, and I think, could have responded to it better.
No.348518
>>348508
>I just meant sexual/provocative.
well that is the problem to me. the cruz campaign and the mecia are pushing that these are nudes. cnn even censored her breast in the photo so all the senior citizens would gasp as if she posed nude. she didnt, they are dragging her through the mud and its pathetic. its almost as pathetic as liz meiers track record with campaigns, how many other candidates careers wi she ruin by "promoting" them? wtf is this wannabe smear?
No.348523
>>348516
>He should have been prepared for it, and I think, could have responded to it better
nah cruzs wife is understandably depressed and cruz has the luz meier b team that couldnt shill its way out if a paper bag. cruz just made a big mistake.
No.348525
>>348518
>cnn even censored her breast in the photo so all the senior citizens would gasp as if she posed nude
Didn't know about that, lol. Just like when they beeped out Trump just mouthing a bad word. Bad taste
Still, when you pose for stuff like that it's a very narrow difference. I mean, it doesn't leave much to the imagination. Not too much of a moral highground to say 'I took everything off but didn't show nipples and vag so I'm a pure maiden".
No.348526
>>348523
I just wanna know what Trump meant by 'spill the beans' on Cruz's wife
No.348532
>>348288
Damn nigga. I support Trump but the Bern doesn´t deserve what he´s getting, even for a commie that doesn´t know shit about economy.
No.348534
>>348532
True. Agree with him or not, he's far better than Hillary at any rate
No.348538
>>348525
>Still, when you pose for stuff like that it's a very narrow difference. I mean, it doesn't leave much to the imagination. Not too much of a moral highground to say 'I took everything off but didn't show nipples and vag so I'm a pure maiden".
i agree but i think it is a bog difference. a girl that is a backup dancer and a stripper are teo different things, posing for hustler and posing for maxim are two different things. its not right to accuse a girl of one when she is really doing the other.
No.348540
>>348538
Yeah that's true. To be fair, the picture released didn't explicitly say 'look nudes' or 'shes a whore' etc. Just had the caption and left people to decide for themselves
No.348543
when did america turn into a joke
No.348545
>>348543
when the internet revealed the truth, the rest of the world isnt doing too good either
No.348546
>>348543
January 20th, 1993
No.348554
>>348525
>'I took everything off but didn't show nipples and vag so I'm a pure maiden".
>He hasn't seen good art
No.348576
>>348244
So this is what money can buy. Well done, Mr. Trump. 10/10 purchase.
No.348579
No.348580
#classless
MAAA
It's like they're third graders.
No.348587
>>348244
Cruz campaign puts out nudez of Trump's wife
no. A Super PAC, which is not in communication with, does not take orders from, and does not answer to, Cruz or any member of his campaign staff, on any level, put out the add.
Saying that Cruz is responsible for the actions of someone else who ran an ad, without his knowledge or consent, but on his behalf, is insane. It is the same level of retard that would claim that Trump is a white-supremacist member of the KKK just because David Duke endorsed him.
Try not being so fucking stupid.
It's not even like no one has seen the picture before. Google her and it comes up. The whore was a nude model.
No.348590
>>348266
>Jelly
>Yes, I know it's CNN
>But I won't archive it anyways
>Calm your mantits, implying it's your fault for being upset that I do this horseshit
No.348610
>>348325
how many women do you know anon?
No.348659
>>348587
cruz hasnt disavowed them, trump was forced to disavow duke over and over and over again
cruz is responsible
No.348669
>>348659
a person is responsible for no actions but their own.
Cruz did not do this, his campaign did not do this, it was not done with his permission or knowledge, and he has no reason to disavow them.
Why is Trump so ashamed of his whore wife that he is throwing a fit about a publicly available picture? And why, if he feels he must go after someone, is he targeting Cruz, and not the woman who is in charge of the PAC that put this out?
No.348672
>>348669
Cruz must disavow!!!
No.348679
>>348669
this is weak pussy language
Nixon did not tape his opponents, his guys did. But Nixon still stepped down because the wrong thing had happened and he was in charge.
Being a leader does actually mean something.
No.348684
>>348244
>Next first lady.
No.348685
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Suddenly I can't help but think of vid related.
Trump, if you're reading this, slap the shit out of Cruz.
No.348687
Imagine nudes of Jeb's wife.
No.348697
>>348314
>Putting nudes of Trump's wife won't either
Specially because Ms. Drumpf looks hot. Ah, the benefits of the moneys.
No.348698
>>348244
>you could support Ted Cruz instead of this gorgeuos blonde woman
No.348700
>>348285
Yipper.
If this is the worst 'dirt' Cruz could dig up that's pretty pathetic. I'm surprised Trump even responded, he should have laughed it off.
No.348702
>>348282
>Heidi Cruz is a senior executive for Goldman Sachs
Now that's a red flag. This means that Cruz has more of a stake in, and will capitulate to the whims of, Goldman Sachs before the American people.
I was considering Cruz to be my second choice but if Trump doesn't win the republican nomination and he ends up being nowhere to be seen on my ballot: I will write him in.
No.348705
>>348479
Nice shop, idiot. The signature at the bottom-right of the illustration clearly says "Dencil Dick".
No.348719
>>348244
Man being a jewish puppet sure has its perks
No.348916
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
“The group that sent out the tweet about Donald’s wife — it’s not our super PAC. I don’t know the people,” Cruz said on Fox Business Wednesday. “As far as I know no one on my team has ever had a conversation with them. We do have super PACs supporting us. That’s not one of them.”
“Donald’s approach when he’s scared, when he’s threatened, when he’s rattled, he inevitably starts yelling and screaming and insulting people and often, cursing. Donald is a bully,” Cruz said. “So he immediately threatened my wife … Heidi is my best friend in the whole world. She’s an incredible mom and I would say, Donald Trump, if you want a character fight, stick with me because Heidi is way out of your league.”
http://archive.is/e5QM5
No.348928
>>348916
>Heidi is my best friend in the whole world
>My best friend in the whole world
>Friend
No.348934
>>348244
I'm amazed that anyone, even heterosexual Mormon women, would consider that a reason NOT to vote for Trump.
Oh my GOD is she "a dish".
No.348938
>>348934
some women might get jelly of how hot she is
No.348939
>>348938
FUCK.
They're going to vote for Hillary because she's the sort of president they could take a selfie with and look like 'the hot one'.
Once again I overestimate women. When will I learn?
No.348949
>>348939
Hillary still seems like a lying bitch tho
No.348950
>>348949
They'll vote for her more because of that too.
>seems like
Hey remember in the 90s when she told us all how marriage was a God given man and woman hrrbrrelreggrggllb?
No.348953
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>348950
No one wants lying bitch in power what are you talking about
No.348955
>>348953
I'm talking about women.
What are you talking about?
No.348957
No.348974
I thought women can make decisions on their own, does that lady need Trump to make her decisions? Aren't women EMPOWERED
No.348992
>>348974
there are twice as many adverts that influence men redart
No.349024
>>348433
>>348479
You two niggers just went full retard at this point. Best advice. Kill yourselves.
Also for the two retards that fail to comprehend what the actual fuck a nudity is. Nudity is the full exposure of body uncensored and exposed. Do you see her breasts fully exposed with nipples included? No you don't.
But in hindsight this is some High School faggotry Cruz is pulling as wew lad this is just fucking sad.
No.349030
>>348372
Imagine Trump's wilted tan-orange cock penetrating Melania.
>>she actually is in love with him…
Lol. I doubt that. If she remarried to old man after her
>>349024
Still, it's some spankbank material. I remember this article/spread and still was turned off because I heard so much Donald Trump on Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous in the 80s, and still dislike him. And whoever is stupid enough to marry him.
No.349054
>>349050
Conniving bitch vs Conniving bitch.
Nothing to see here, go back to your business…
No.349068
>>348286
>So the question is, where are all the fucking feminists who freaked out defending Amanda Todd and a Zoe Quinn (one who had pics released without consent and one who released them with consent) screaming muhsoggyknees and foul play and victim shaming?
At he exact same place they were during the Rotherham mass rapes and the Cologne taharrush: silent in their hugboxes, lest they accidentally join the forces of evil white cishets who are the true oppressors.
No.349106
>>348534
agreed.
i don't understand why they piss on him so much, we should focus more on hillary
she's the real enemy
No.349116
>>349106
My guess is that it's either D&C Hillary shills, or since Trump is the troll's candidate, some trolls just can't restrain themselves.
No.349160
>>349116
>D&C Hillary shills
>on an obscure taiwanese imageboard
No.349200
No.349250
>>349200
i guess
Or just people from other countries who don't care
No.349252
>>349250
There are other countries?
No.349272
>>348916
> Heidi is my best friend in the whole world
>friend
TED BOOGERATO'S A CUCK
No.349344
These people don't seem to understand that this is actually going to give SUPPORT to Trump. Just look at the difference between JFK and Bill Clinton. JFK philandered, but nobody cared because he was railing Marilyn goddamn Monroe. Billy didn't even put his OWN dick in that, and the nation recoiled in disgust, because it was Monica.
And Trump doesn't even have to cheat to get that ass. These idiots are cementing Trump's alpha malehood in the public's mind thinking that the public will become disgusted by it, when psychology dictates otherwise.
No.349350
>>349050
Lel he sent that to his wife? This man will make politics fun for 8 years.
No.349357
>>349050
I know it's probably a bit retouched, and she has professional make up done, but that woman is gorgeous. It will be refreshing to have such beauty as the First Lady again.
No.349416
>>349344
> the nation recoiled in disgust,
Just Republicans. Most people didn't care, which is why it wound up making the Republicans look like idiots.
No.349434
The man is a shitposting grandmaster level 9 dan.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
No.351091
File: 1458942651483.png (63.86 KB, 495x488, 495:488, Donald J. Trump - I have n….png)
No.351134
>>348244
bump for real news
No.351358
>>348374
I can't accept that apology unless you take him back.
t. Texan
No.351396
>Donald Duck inherited something
No.351415
>>351396
Took you long enough.
No.351509
Are they seriously asking the voters to vote for the fugly alternative? Christ.
No.351566
>>348244
>ITT
>OP is a faggot who thinks Cruz or Cruz supporters made this ad
>PAC in question actually supports Kaisch
How does it feel to be a stupid fucking moron OP?
No.351652
No.351659
>>348254
Whats wrong with that?
Monkeys should be with other Monkeys
No.351668
>>349054
conniving bitch vs hot conniving bitch
something to see here, but who cares, its the internet with real porn
No.351677