[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 3d / asmr / biz / creep / s / strek / turul / wooo ]

/n/ - News

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


8chan News Board Ring: /pn/ - Politics and News - /politics/ - Politics

File: ae7065099d4af3e⋯.jpg (90.93 KB, 568x458, 284:229, 21school_dees.jpg)

 No.557951

The federally mandated, nationally standardized education program Common Core has many parents and teachers concerned. For starters, it imposes rigorous testing onto students, forcing curriculums to be molded around exams, not necessarily around learning or the development of critical thinking. Additionally, Common Core is part of a system developed by corporations and aims to prepare children for the life of being an employee, not a change-maker.

The program is causing friction around the nation, and a slow-burn rebellion of sorts is underway. In 2015, 4th grader Sydney Smoot made national headlines when she eloquently ripped standardized testing at a school board meeting.

So what happens to a school and the students therein when Common Core is abandoned altogether?

Mason Classical Academy (MCA), a charter school in Naples, Florida has been applauded for its testing results in English Language Arts after the school ditched Common Core.

http://www.activistpost.com/2017/07/school-ditches-common-core-soars-1-english-language-arts.html

 No.557957

The biggest problem of the Educational system of America? Niggers.

School doesn't help low IQ Homo Erectus synapses


 No.557958

It's almost like common core isn't designed to actually educate children. I wonder (((who))) would profit from creating an entire generation of ignorant, uneducated drones.


 No.557961

>>557958

The GOP since the "uneducated" tend to vote republican.

kidrock.jpg


 No.557964

obviously

common core was always about crippling white students by "teaching" everyone nonsense so niggers and spics don't feel bad

(((they've))) even admitted it

it's much easier to pull everyone down than teach literal retards(=non-whites) anything


 No.557966

>>557964

If whites are so smart how come it is so easy to white genocide them?


 No.557970

>>557961

orrrrrr…. both parties. dont be a sheep


 No.557974

>>557970

Dont give /leftypol/ attention. They feed off of it.


 No.557975

>>557970

College educated demos skew Dem though.

The DNC party bosses might prefer a dumbed down populace for other reasons, but not for electability.


 No.557976

>>557975

And most college degrees are in useless things that any idiot can get, like Art, Dance, or Social Studies.

Engineers, Math, and the Hard Sciences trend Republican.


 No.557977

>>557961

ok moishe, stay scared.


 No.557978

2 x 2 (2 + 2)

what is the answer, /n/?

according to commoncore the correct answer is 16 and 1.


 No.557979

>>557966

we're too kind for our own good, after all, we were made in the likeness of God himself.


 No.557980

>>557978

Brackets first, so its 2×2(4) or 2×2×(4)

So only 16. Common core a shit.


 No.557982

>>557978

What? It is always 16 unless you don't do the brackets first in some way.

even 2x2x(2+2)=(4+4)x2 would work


 No.557983

>>557978

>implicit divisor

Never seen it used though. It's good that they inform the kids that that form is fucking garbage and that they shouldn't rely on implicit multiplication when they write an equation though.


 No.557985

File: 361ba2e256c669d⋯.jpg (107.23 KB, 800x600, 4:3, 1422151592366.jpg)


 No.557986

>>557985

How the fuck does that equal one?


 No.557987

>>557986

Nvm, I see they did all the multiplication first.


 No.557988

>>557978

PEMDAS

It's sixteen


 No.557990

>>557987

The thing is, the parenthesis don't actually matter.

Multiplication is commutative, so 4*2*2 is the same as 4*(2*2).

Guess that shows that the person who made that slide didn't understand the old way, because both say 16.

Kind of a bad picture to use if you're against common core, since the common core side is clearly the correct one.


 No.557995

>>557966

It's not easy; (((they))) have been working at it for thousands of years.


 No.557998

>>557985

>PEMDAS

This is what happens when you memorize something like 'brackets first' and don't know what it actually means. You have people who write equations like this and don't have any fucking clue what associations are supposed to exist and don't understand the relations between the operators.

Common core is the future we fucking deserve. Only the truly gifted will rise above it.


 No.557999

>prepare children for the life of being an employee, not a change-maker.

>employee, not a change-maker.

>change-maker

Yes it does. What type of job you think these kids growing up on common core are going to get, beside a cashier?


 No.558001

>>557966

Trust me, if it were as easy as you say it is, the Middle East wouldn't be as fucked up as it is today.


 No.558011

>>557966

Who said it's easy the war has just begun… You should remember that Whites are trusting & kind people until they know you're fucking them over. In the next 10 years you'll eat that arrogant statement.


 No.558023

>>557976

Did you pull that out of your ass?


 No.558025

>>557990

Some people think that it is appropriate to do implicit multiplication first. Others haven't used the division symbol since the fifth grade, and couldn't care less because they would never write something so ambiguous.


 No.558028

>common core

>liberal

pick one


 No.558029

maybe when all schools decide to ditch common core, the schools will stop breeding dumbfucks who vote republican.


 No.558031

>>558011

> trusting & kind

You forgot to add greedy as fuck too. Seems you skipped the part of history where they conquered the new world for gold and silver


 No.558035

>>557985

Holy fuck it was a problem all its own to figure out what mistake was made to get 1. Some retard actually multiplied 5x4 before dividing 20 by the reaulting product. There are no two correct awnsers In basic marh. If you turned this equation into an algebraic one by substituting any number for X and providing the awnser as 1 it would generate an incorrect solution. A scientific calcualtor woild give you a decimal number of some sort that wouldent be listed among the choice of answers. What the fuck is going on in schools?


 No.558037

>>557961

Minorities in the US have an average IQ 15+ points lower as a mean average. Minorities regularly vote 80% democrat or whatever is the gib party in their country.

There's zero chance you could ever make up for that much baggage. By default the democrats are provably dumber without even having to do much napkin math.


 No.558038

>>558035

1 is the only correct answer. Brackets first, then multiplication, then division. PEMDAS.


 No.558039

>>558031

They conquered the new world before they knew there was gold there.

Most resources are found after the fact well living there. Alaska/California gold rushes clearly weren't known to long after the main settlement phase. English speakers didn't really take over anywhere with much gold until it was found in south africa. Which was after the US was independant for like 100 years.


 No.558040

File: 62a93ad6558a31f⋯.png (27.12 KB, 640x450, 64:45, FT_16_09_14_educationalDiv….png)

>>558037

>Today, it is the more educated voters who are more likely to favor the Democratic candidate, and the gap between the groups is far wider than it was 20 years ago.

>Unlike the overall educational gap, an educational gap among white voters is not new – whites without a college degree have voted for GOP candidates by larger margins than their counterparts with more education in the last four presidential contests. But the gap this year appears to have grown wider.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/15/educational-divide-in-vote-preferences-on-track-to-be-wider-than-in-recent-elections/

>Those with postgraduate degrees back Clinton by about three-to-one (59% vs. 21%); among those with some or no college experience, preferences are divided (41% back Trump, 36% Clinton, 9% Johnson and 5% Stein).

http://www.people-press.org/2016/08/18/clinton-trump-supporters-have-starkly-different-views-of-a-changing-nation/


 No.558041

>>557966

There was never many whites to begin with at any time. They're always being genocided no matter what, even when they're massively sucessful.


 No.558042

The entire point of Common Core was to attempt to address the criticisms of Rote Learning vs Critical Thinking. It was a massive mistake from the get-go. Being drafted hastily by psychologists as if an attempt to conduct an experiment to appease their own confirmation bias. Sloppy, rushed, drafted by people who don't know jack shit about teaching and without any form of trial. In addition to leftists inherent inability to apply a human factor ever (most children in schools expect rote learning because children tend to not want to grasp concepts critically without actual interest in a subject, this is where psychologists went wrong, their research was based on people who showed an initial willingness to be part of the test). Who the fuck seriously thought Common Core was a good idea?


 No.558043

>>558040

You know all that tells me is that there is something seriously fucking wrong with colleges.

>having college education automatically makes you smart


 No.558045

>>558040

You do realize most of those college degrees are sociology degrees handed out like candy to SJWs right?


 No.558049

File: 2f55be2c9fa639b⋯.jpg (16.2 KB, 481x392, 481:392, 136598-136573.jpg)

>>558043

>>558045

>In both the Senate and House, Democrats were significantly smarter than Republicans when looking at just the top 1%, and more likely to attend an “elite school.” Specifically Harvard. Among Democrats, 15.1% of Senators and 12.4% of House members attended Harvard. Among Republicans these percentages were 8.9% and 1.3%, respectively.

>Research has indicated that individuals who are politically liberal are more likely to have higher ability than those who are politically conservative in America (Kanazawa, 2010) and Britain (Deary, Batty, & Gale, 2008). However, this finding pertained to voters rather than political leaders those people had elected. This study demonstrates that in America, Democrats are more likely than Republicans to have a higher percentage of Senate and House members in the top 1% of cognitive ability and Democrats had a higher ability and education level, on average, than Republicans.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201311/who-s-smarter-republicans-and-democrats-in-congress


 No.558054

>>557998

Let me re-write the problem for you.

(20)*(1/5)*(4)

The old way is also 16. The answer is never 1. To say that 1 and 16 is equally correct makes me lose faith in this world.


 No.558055

>>557978

Wait wait wait, how the actual fuck are you supposed to get 1 from x=2x2(2+2)? Surely you'd get either 16 (if you do it properly) or 16 if you do it the wrong way around. I'll admit that it's been a while since I did math beyond basic 4 functions, but surely…

2x2(2+2)

4(2+2)

4(4)

16

What sort of bizarre dark magic does it take to get 1 from this equation?


 No.558056

>>558049

You're going to have to try harder than an article that was debunked by the New York Times of all fucking places


 No.558057

>>558049

>more likely to attend an “elite school.” Specifically Harvard.

>Attending Harvard means you're smart.

You research is shit, and you're retarded.


 No.558059

>>558056

>>558057

>The higher the intelligence of Add Health respondents in junior high and high school, the more liberal they grow up to be in their early adulthood. The mean adolescent intelligence of young adults who identify themselves as ‘‘very liberal’’ is 106.42, while that of those who identify themselves as ‘‘very conservative’’ is 94.82. The differences in mean adolescent intelligence by adult political ideology is highly statistically significant (F (4, 13053) 583.6327, p\ .00001).

Social Psychology Quarterly, 73, 33-57.


 No.558065

>>558049

Your biased reporting means jack shit

I can also post biased news

http://theblacksphere.net/2017/03/pew-research-republicans-smarter-than-democrats/

http://www.truthjustice.net/politics/republicans-are-smarter-than-democrats/

It is obvious you're just trying to start shit and make this board an even shittier place by b8'ing a website with a neo-nazi board as the most visited. Fuck off


 No.558066

>>558049

So you're saying that Republicans don't just represent but in many cases actually are the people who do actual work that the country relies on for a living? When using actual work here I mean the sort of work you can't do from a comfy chair in an air conditioned office.


 No.558068

>Conservatives exhibit less cognitive ability than liberals do. Or that's what it says in the social science literature, anyway. A 2010 study using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, for example, found that the IQs of young adults who described themselves as "very liberal" averaged 106.42, whereas the mean of those who identified as "very conservative" was 94.82. Similarly, when a 2009 study correlated cognitive capacity with political beliefs among 1,254 community college students and 1,600 foreign students seeking entry to U.S. universities, it found that conservatism is "related to low performance on cognitive ability tests." In 2012, a paper reported that people endorse more conservative views when drunk or under cognitive pressure; it concluded that "political conservatism may be a process consequence of low-effort thought."

http://reason.com/archives/2014/06/13/are-conservatives-dumber-than-liberals


 No.558069

https://www.unz.com/jthompson/election-special-are-republicans/

>>Noah Carl (2014) found that Republicans were brighter than Democrats by 2-3 IQ points, and that a Republican advantage held true even when allowance was made for socio-economic status.


 No.558070

>>Republicans generally outperformed Democrats on the current quiz. On 13 of the 19 questions, Republicans score significantly higher than Democrats

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/03/10/pew-makes-it-official-republicans-are-smarter-than-democrats-54686


 No.558071

File: 932e84cb9782bc0⋯.jpg (57.58 KB, 343x454, 343:454, miranda.jpg)

Reminder that these people know they're better than you and do this for your best interests, if only you were smart like them then you'd understand,


 No.558072

File: 34bf0f0453b099a⋯.jpg (52.26 KB, 600x600, 1:1, who.jpg)

>>558071

>If you were smart, you would accept instead of think on your own.


 No.558073

https://reason.com/archives/2014/06/13/are-conservatives-dumber-than-liberals/

>Republicans have slightly higher verbal intelligence scores (2–5 IQ points) than Democrats.

>Carl finds that Republicans have a 5.48 IQ point advantage over Democrats. Broadening party affiliation to include moderate to merely leaning respondents still results in a Republican advantage of 3.47 IQ points and 2.47 IQ points respectively


 No.558074

>>558073

…And here's the rest of the quote you left out.

>Carl reconciles his findings with the social science literature that reports that liberals are more intelligent than conservatives by proposing that Americans with classically liberal beliefs are even smarter. Carl further reports that those who endorse both social conservatism and economic statism also have lower verbal IQ scores.

>"Overall, my findings suggest that higher intelligence among classically liberal Republicans compensates for lower intelligence among socially conservative Republicans," concludes Carl.

Even Noah Carl, who you are leaning so hard on, concludes that classical liberals are more intelligent than social conservatives.

He also acknowledges that his research is out of step with most of the data, which shows that liberals consistently have an average higher IQ than conservatives.


 No.558075

>>558074

Classical Liberals are right-wing you stupid fucking retard. You dare call Republicans stupid while stating Classical Liberalism and Neoliberalism are the same thing?


 No.558076

>>558059

This is the same research that claims that liberals value marriage exclusivity more than conservatives, despite it being a conservative virtue. It apparently did not cross the minds of the researchers that when children are interviewed, they will tell you what they think you want to hear. Even they know that claiming to be liberal is the convenient answer when you consider how conservatives are treated.

The same could be said about drunk people being more conservative. Their abilities to hide their power-levels have been reduced. Who is to know that the person who would normally claims to be liberal is a jew-hating /pol/lack.

Your first post was debunked. Yet you ignored it and tried to bury your critics in even more studies that are likely nonsense. It is obvious you care less about the truth, and more about propaganda.


 No.558077

>>558075

>Classical liberals, Carl notes, believe that an individual should be free to make his own lifestyle choices and to enjoy the profits derived from voluntary transactions with others.

Carl makes no claims of classical liberals as have a correlation with America's right wing.

Neoliberalism (free trade, open markets ect.), however, is most certainly right wing.

I suspect that since you are conservative you are of lesser intelligence and have difficulty understanding that neoliberalism has nothing to do with North American liberalism.


 No.558078

>Democrats think they're smarter than Republicans

Ignoring all those Fortune 500 CEOs, the Democrats nominated Hillary Clinton. That alone is a red flag.


 No.558080

>>558077

>Carl makes no claims of classical liberals as have a correlation with America's right wing.

>"Carl begins by pointing out that there is data suggesting that a segment of the American population holding classical liberal beliefs tends to vote Republican."

You are retarded and illiterate. Forget reading a short article, just abuse the word correlation. Surely that will make you look smart.


 No.558082

>>558076

>This is the same research that claims that liberals value marriage exclusivity more than conservatives

No. Being of substandard intelligence you are misinterpreting the data.

>Correlation between adolescent intelligence and the value on sexual exclusivity is r5 .0572 (n 5 7,657) among women, and r 5 .0849 (n 5 6,756) among men. The correlation is statistically significantly larger among men than among women (t 5 2.9774, n 5 14,413, p\ .01).

Where are you getting, "liberals value marriage exclusivity more than conservatives" from that? It shows that higher intelligence in men indicates a higher favorability for exclusivity, but that no such relationship exists for women.

>The same could be said about drunk people being more conservative.

Drunk people probably would also score lower on IQ tests. Thank you for providing supporting evidence to my argument.

>Your first post was debunked.

Some anon claimed a NYT article debunked it but didn't provide a link.


 No.558084

>>558080

Whether classical liberalism can be claimed by the modern right or left can be debated. I'm saying that Carl doesn't weigh in on this subject one way or the other.

He does acknowledges that most previous research shows that liberals are smarter than conservatives. He brings classical liberalism into it to explain this discrepancy in his findings


 No.558085

>Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology. They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

>What this study and those before it suggest is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

tl;dr

/pol/ is a tard magnet


 No.558086

>>558082

Your thoughts on whether say, abortion should be illegal, doesn't change whether you are drunk or sober, retard. Your willingness to tell people about your views does, however.

>>558084

>He does acknowledges that most previous research shows that liberals are smarter than conservatives.

Acknowledging that his research is different doesn't mean he acknowledges he is wrong. He still believes that Republicans have a 5.48 IQ point advantage over Democrats, and broadening party affiliation to include moderate to merely leaning respondents still results in a Republican advantage of 3.47 IQ points and 2.47 IQ points respectively.


 No.558087

>>558055

* not +


 No.558093

>>558085

>Childhood

>Not knowing that most of /pol/ grew up as liberals and became racists as they grew older.


 No.558095

File: 36533eb9e92a8a5⋯.png (20.63 KB, 420x344, 105:86, untitled.png)

>>558086

Are drunks more conservative? I don't know. But the more highly educated are more liberal. That much is clear.

>Highly educated adults – particularly those who have attended graduate school – are far more likely than those with less education to take predominantly liberal positions across a range of political values. And these differences have increased over the past two decades.

http://www.people-press.org/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/


 No.558096

>>558093

That has no bearing on whether /pol/ posters where dumb children. Although the data predicts they where.


 No.558100

>>558095

>>558095

As there is plenty of indoctrination in universities, it is no surprise that those in the middle eventually lean left after prolonged exposure.

All of this is nonsense is just a genetic fallacy anyways. The importation of savages cannot be defended thus, you find ways to call people who make solid points dumb.

"People who believe the same things as you are dumb. Therefore you are dumb yourself."

What disgusting sophistry this is!


 No.558102

>>558100

Rather, the rigors of higher academia weeds out lower IQ individuals. And with them the social conservatives get left behind.


 No.558103

>>558095

Highly educated means nothing. A gender studies student is more educated than a plumber, but only one of these is smart and a benefit to society.

Add in the bias to pushing affirmative action to get more groups highly likely to vote democrat, and you have even more reason to be sceptical.

Old conservative universities produced kids who benefited our country and made all sorts of advances. Now we are in decline, yet more "educated", almost as if there was (((someone))) fucking things up behind the scenes. Enjoy your academia that produces nothing but useful idiots who brew coffee.

How fucked are those graduates when automation really takes off?


 No.558104

>>558103

The data shows not only are the highly educated more socially liberal but that this is likely due to high intelligence being an indicator of social liberal politics.

Even Noah Carl recognizes this.

>It is well known that individuals with so-called liberal or leftist views are overrepresented in American academia. By bringing together data on American academics, the general population and a high-IQ population, the present study investigates how much of this overrepresentation can be explained by intelligence. It finds that intelligence can account for most of the disparity between academics and the general population on the issues of abortion, homosexuality and traditional gender roles.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289615001373

(Full article behind paywall, but you can read the abstract.)


 No.558106

>Now we are in decline, yet more "educated", almost as if there was (((someone))) fucking things up behind the scenes.

You believe this because you favor simple answers to complex questions, being stupid and all.


 No.558107

Republican and Democrat are poorly defined and the demographics of Democratic and Republican Voters have changed over time. I would indeed love to see a study done today after the Democrats poisoned their voter base by holding registration booths at Gay Pride Parades. This is all a massive liberal wank fest from the early 2010s we're talking about here


 No.558109

File: f99752bd49905b9⋯.jpg (21.12 KB, 369x213, 123:71, lul.jpg)

>558106

You prefer name-calling to discussion because you prefer simple responses to complex questions, being stupid and all.


 No.558110


 No.558112

File: ff2321ee1cabc1a⋯.jpg (61.92 KB, 960x960, 1:1, Political-Affiliations-Inf….jpg)

>>558110

forgot pic


 No.558113

>>558074

Classical liberal here

Don't fucking lump me in with your bitch ass movements, I'd side with the conservative and put bullets in traitors long before I ever considered someone like you an ally.


 No.558118

>>558113

Your personal definitions have no bearing on reality.

When Carl says classical liberal he seems to mean social liberal and economically conservative.

Whatever idiosyncratic definition you have is irrelevant.


 No.558119

File: 9221871e988112e⋯.jpg (116.81 KB, 2048x1025, 2048:1025, smuggles.jpg)

>>558106

"Why are people suspicious of Jews?"

"Because they are dumb and prefer simple answers."

That sounds like a simple answer to a complex question to me. It looks like you are too dumb to perform basic self-reflection and realize that you are doing the same thing that you say stupid people do, dumbass.


 No.558120

>>558110

>Adblock Detected

Fuck that link.

Anyway wealth accumulation and inheritance received do not indicate intelligence.

Sammy Hagar is worth more than Stephen Hawking.


 No.558122

>>558118

>>558120

>Anyway wealth accumulation and inheritance received do not indicate intelligence.

And IQ results indicate intelligence. Unless we are talking about negro IQ results of course, then this time IQ results don't indicate intelligence.


 No.558123

>>558119

>self-reflection

That has nothing to do with anything, we are talking about raw numbers and science here.

Just because something makes you feel bad doesn't make it untrue.


 No.558125

>>558122

>And IQ results indicate intelligence.

Yes. And higher IQ indicates a tendency toward social liberalism and away from social conservatism.


 No.558126

File: 62ed17dffc54fb5⋯.jpg (7.24 KB, 225x225, 1:1, misakasmug.jpg)

>>558123

>Just because something makes you feel bad doesn't make it untrue.

You should take your own advice.

This is simple logic.

1.) You say that dumb people prefer simple answers to complex questions.

2.) You have demonstrated that you prefer simple answers to complex questions.

Apply your framework to yourself and you will come to the conclusion that you are dumb.


 No.558127

>>558120

>Anyway wealth accumulation and inheritance received do not indicate intelligence.

Funny how "Social Progressives" say the exact polar opposite unless it agrees with their agenda. So niggers are just retards all along then?


 No.558129

>>558125

Define social liberalism. One could argue modern Social Democrats are very much socially conservative, they just use identity politics differently than Republicans. In America both parties are right-wing to some extent compared to other countries


 No.558130

File: 169112e44d2d665⋯.jpg (8.6 KB, 273x184, 273:184, niggers.jpg)

>>558125

>Yes (IQ is a valid indicator of intelligence)

So niggers are just morons then?


 No.558131

File: 39c79e55f4f0d22⋯.jpg (23.62 KB, 480x353, 480:353, 8dbac797020c385c3ed4c5aa0d….jpg)

>>558120

In other words you're saying IQ is not a measure of success. Because the Democratic party is very much self-evident of that if your articles are to be believed


 No.558135

>>558125

>Republicans have a 5.48 IQ point advantage over Democrats

He straight up says that higher IQ indicates a tendency to vote republican, and the classical liberals have a tendency to vote republican.


 No.558136

>>558126

>You say that dumb people prefer simple answers to complex questions.

I'm not saying that. Rather it is what the research is telling us.


 No.558138

>>558135

Carl only finds that outliner on the D vs. R divide. And he also says that social liberals have higher IQs than social conservatives.

He makes the classical liberal claim based on intelligence and opinions on income inequality. And even there he notes, " But for methodological reasons, this finding is tentative."


 No.558140

>>558131

>In other words you're saying IQ is not a measure of success.

If by success you mean wealth, then yes.

>Stephen Hawking net worth:

>$20 Million

>Kim Kardashian net worth:

>$175 Million


 No.558142

>>557985

>both are correct

Mistakes are perfection, ignorance is knowledge, weakness is strength.

If I would have written that as a student, my teacher would have laughed me out of the classroom. You have to type stuff correctly; either put the bracket on top or on the bottom. You cant put it to the side and say "it can go either/or lol".


 No.558143

>>558140

We do not actually know Stephen Hawkings IQ for certain since he never formally tested it. We assume it to be rather high but it's possible even a theoretical quantum physicist can flunk an IQ test


 No.558156

File: 42eb58426268d41⋯.jpg (39.41 KB, 416x320, 13:10, IMG_2057.JPG)

>>557966

Because we whites are compassionate and try to exercise understanding. Unfortunately, most of my white brothers and sisters have not woke up yet and faced the reality that non-whites are incompatible with Western society. They try do the right thing but time will prove me right.


 No.558158

>>558130

Funny how /leftypol/ is all about IQ but show them that graph and they stay quiet.


 No.558159

>>558140

I can do this too!

>Donald J Trump (peace be upon him)

>billions

>Anita Sarkikesian

>hundreds of thousands? Maybe a million?


 No.558187

>>558038

you do division or multiplication first from left to right


 No.558202

>>558156

Burn the coal, pay the toll.


 No.558203

>>558049

So attending an "elite school" signifies intelligence? They should redo that study and compare IQs not how good a school they went to. Anyone can get into these "prestigious" schools nowadays


 No.558204

>>558203

>. Anyone can get into these "prestigious" schools nowadays

Only if you're a nigger or beaner.


 No.558258

>>558158

Blacks on average have lower IQs than whites.

Whites on average have lower IQs then Koreans.

Social conservatives and racists on average have lower IQs then liberals.

One of these facts you cling to like a drowning man to a raft. The others you plug your ears to and try to ignore.

Stay in denial /pol/.


 No.558262

>>558136

lol lefties never own up to their hypocrisy


 No.558265

>>558262

Hypocrisy doesn't enter into facts and figures.

Your personal feeling are irrelevant to science.

Facts are facts.


 No.558266

File: 63e0996efe26d7d⋯.png (718.49 KB, 1023x682, 3:2, 83beb140956ce23af8971d0485….png)

>>558265

The fact is that whites are the superior race.


 No.558268

File: df9b01a47304d69⋯.jpg (21.31 KB, 350x237, 350:237, ftsbs-small.jpg)

>>558066

Is that why red states have to be so heavily subsidized by blue?


 No.558270

>>558258

Im from pol and I agree with those generalizations.

But if you tried to post the fact that blacks have a lower IQ than whites on facebook you would get banned for hate speech.

But you can say they are taller and faster runners than whites.

Which is a bit of a double standard.


 No.558271

>>558266

On an intelligence scale. Blacks are the superior race genetically.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/02/22/whites-genetically-weaker-than-blacks-study-finds.html


 No.558272

>>558271

>getting btfo by your own link.

I do not have an image smug enough for this moment.


 No.558275

>>558270

Fuck Facebook

>>558272

Do you have reading comprehension trouble?


 No.558278

>>558271

You spelt inferior wrong.


 No.558279

>>558278

>White Americans are both genetically weaker and less diverse than their black compatriots, a Cornell University-led study finds.

/pol/ is all feels over reals when it comes to things they don't want to hear.


 No.558281

>>558279

Its certainly worrying for the future of humanity that having a low IQ correlates with being genetically dominant.

Basically it means humanities IQ is certain to decline unless we got some kind of genetic based breeding program going


 No.558286

>>558258

The socialist WHITE nations of northern europe have a higher HDI of anywhere else on Earth. It just goes to show that when you combine the SUPERIOR RACE with the superior economic system, you get nations that are freer and more prosperous than any other country. Nordic white people are simply the bees knees, none can compare to their grace, intelligence, benevolence, and beauty. I get chills just thinking about them. They are like gods.


 No.558287

>>558279

Go back and read your own post, then kill yourself when you realize how badly you goofed.


 No.558289

>>558286

White nations also have suicidal immigration policies.

That is the one problem we need to fix.


 No.558301

>>558271

All of that ape strength won't do those niggers any good when they are getting pulled down a dirt road via a chain tied to the hitch of my 450 horsepower truck (also a white invention).


 No.558303

>>558289

You can thank the Jews for that. We are too trusting and altruistic for our own good. It is both our greatest strength and our greatest weakness.


 No.558305

File: 0a4b22c262fe139⋯.jpg (44.93 KB, 550x550, 1:1, fc,550x550,white.jpg)


 No.558309

>>558305

I'm not trying to be edgy, hauling niggers down the road with chains is a great american tradition. Look it up if you don't believe me.


 No.558313

>>558029

Common core was convinced to aid students who have difficulty learning by traditional means (that was fine-tuned over the last 2 centuries to work with a baseline moderate intelligence.) In other words, traditional education was making minorities look bad because they couldn't keep up, so we had to revamp our entire education system so it didn't hurt their feelings.

Over 80% of these minorities votes Democrat.


 No.558357

>>558305

We've had this discussion three times, Reddit shill. Don't make me repeat myself again.


 No.558368

>>557990

Parenthesis does actually matter you calculate everything in the parenthesis first before moving on. This is a basic but important structure to all equations, if we did things your way nobody would be able to sole the very long or more complicated equations.


 No.558373

>>558087

Not according to >>557978

>2 x 2 (2 + 2)


 No.558383

>>557958

I'd like to remind you the Bolshevik revolution was backed by highly educated "intellectuals." Education is important, but if you spend your time learning nonsense you're no better off.


 No.558391

>>557985

The answer was always 16. The fuck is this shit?


 No.558393

>>558391

Forgot to add the obvious:

20/5(2*2)

20/5*4

4*4

16

Was anyone ever taught differently?


 No.558406

>>558041

I dunno, Rome was the biggest city in the world for a while.


 No.558410

>>558104

>highly educated

Doesn't mean shit. take it from someone who actually is "highly educated". College is 90% people who can barely write their own names, and I'd guess that includes you.


 No.558423

>>558055

It took me a little while to figure it out, but I think when they got to

4(4)

they DIVIDED instead of multiplying like you're supposed to. That's all I can figure anyway, it takes a special kind of retardation to get 1 out of a problem with only multiplication and addition operators, with no numbers under 2.


 No.558458

>>558410

Higher education and high IQ BOTH indicate liberal social leanings. This is really difficult for you to understand, isn't it?


 No.558496

File: e640190b0c2bc67⋯.png (39.45 KB, 1573x986, 1573:986, normal vs CC.png)

>>557985

The confusion seems to be because of the formatting of the problem. I immediately thought the answer was one because I imagined it like the left way, but some other anons saw it like right.


 No.558508

deliberate dumb down


 No.558513

>>557990

>the parenthesis don't matter

Looks like you can't do math, bud, sorry.You're the kind of retard this system was designed for.

>>558055

Some of the other anons pointed it out. It's confusing precisely because it's deliberately counter intuitive.

>>558271

Raw strength does not instantly grant superiority. Blacks tend to have innate disease vulnerabilities, too. Try again, retard.


 No.558514

>>558513

>deliberately counter intuitive

But it's not though. Sure, (20)(1/5)(2*2) might trip up some retarded Amerilards who don't understand that PEMDAS is actually (PE)(MD)(AS), but that's not the problem anon initially posted. It was 2*2(2+2), and the only way you could possibly get a wrong answer on that is if you either ignore the parentheses altogether, or treat them as a division operator instead of multiplication.


 No.558515

File: c568b9ea2f232e1⋯.webm (3.94 MB, 853x480, 853:480, It's happening.webm)

>>558423

>they DIVIDED instead of multiplying

>They preformed the categorical opposite procedure to the one that mathematics instructs them to preform in that situation.

>This answer is "equally right".

I haven't feeled this sort of feel in a while now.


 No.558519

>>558513

>Blacks tend to have innate disease vulnerabilities, too.

Yes. At lower rates then frail whites.


 No.558520

liberal nigger jew jew liberal nigger communist jew nigger


 No.558527

File: c259d837d9017c0⋯.jpg (80.21 KB, 492x559, 492:559, truly.jpg)

>>558265

1.) You said dumb people perfer simple answers to complex questions.

2.) You prefer simple answers to complex questions.

> "I didn't say that, data did! Your personal feeling(sic) are irrelevant to science."

1.)Data you presented say dumb people prefer simple answers to complex questions.

2.) You prefer simple answers to complex questions.

It's the same fucking thing, moron.

You have completely missed the point. Facts and figures (that you presented) state that what you do is dumb. You do it anyways, and you don't even notice you are doing it.When it is pointed out, you claim that your own hypocrisy doesn't enter facts and figures, even though it is the fact and figures you posted that reveals your own Hypocrisy.

You go out of your way to say you are smarter and more logical than your opponents, yet you do not posses the reading comprehension to understand even simple things. I know we call each others retards all the time, but it's usually as a joke. It isn't with you. You truly are retarded.


 No.558528

>>558527

One does have to use simplified terminology when speaking with whites.


 No.558529

>>558458

> "Being college educated doesn't mean anything."

> Higher education and high IQ BOTH indicate liberal social leanings. This is really difficult for you to understand, isn't it? (Something complete irrelevant from the things said)

You're illiterate.


 No.558530

>>558528

Again, you are too dumb to comprehend what you read. It isn't about simplified terminology. It never was. It is about simple thoughts.


 No.558532

>>558529

The two go hand in hand most but not all of the time. The rest of the time the are separate predictors of leftist political leanings.


 No.558534

>>558530

In order to communicate with low intelligent white people, complexity must be kept to a minimum or they get confused and angry.


 No.558541

File: 8f726a89661f8e9⋯.png (64.72 KB, 300x300, 1:1, outsmugged.png)

>>558271

>"Conservatives should shut up because we have higher intelligence on average."

>Niggers have the IQs of retards

>"Intelligence doesn't matter!"

>"Here have a link that theorizes how since Europeans were greatly reduced in number in the past, thus reducing genetic diversity, that niggers are superior even if niggers are, consistently through every test, dumber!"

>"Haha checkmate whites!"

Non-whites are really this dumb. And they think by posting this shit where they blatantly contradict themselves, they've won.


 No.558551

>>558541

Blacks have lower IQs than whites on average. This is true.

Conservatives have lower IQs than liberals on average. This is also true.

Yet one of these two facts causes a huge spergout on this board. Now why would that be?


 No.558553

>>558551

>Conservatives have lower IQs than liberals on average. This is also true.

What kind of paint thinner are you huffing anon?


 No.558554

>>558551

You cause a spergout when people point out niggers are dumber because it contradicts your entire framework of the world.

1.) Research was posted that racists have lower IQ.

2.) Research was posted that niggers have lower IQ.

3.) Saying niggers have lower IQ is racist.


 No.558555

>>558551

>Let's forget that research was posted where people who vote republican have about five points higher than those who vote democrat.

>People who vote republican are actually liberals, this liberals are still smarter.

Jump through those hoops, boy.


 No.558556

this whole thread consists of people from both sides doing their best to continue to categorize each other to one-up them. you're all stupid as fuck tbh


 No.558557

>>558534

Communicate the rest of your complex thought then.

"Why do people hate the jews?"

The simpleton's response: "Because they prefer simple answers."

Show us the complex reason why people hate the jews. Unless of course, this simple thought is the only thing you are capable of, of course.


 No.558559

>>558553

Low IQ is a huge indicator of reactionary politics, as has been linked to a number of times up thread.


 No.558562

>>558559

>Low IQ is a huge indicator of reactionary politics

It hasn't been linked. Link it.

Low IQ is an indicator of high likely you are to accept everything told you, as conformity is low effort thought. In the past, culture was heavily conservative, thus high-IQ individuals tended towards the left. Now, culture is heavily liberal, this high-IQ individuals will tend towards the right.


 No.558563

>>558555

This has already been explained. The research that shows Rs have higher IQs comes from Carl, who acknowledges his research is an outliner. He also admits that his own research and the research of others shows social liberals have higher IQs than social conservatives. He reconciles this by claiming the Rs with higher IQs are really classical liberals - still socially leftist but with free market beliefs.


 No.558564

>>558563

>>558138

>outliner

>outliner

You keep making this mistake. Do you not know the difference between outline and outlier?


 No.558566

>>558564

Your right about that, I did mean to say outlier.


 No.558568

ITT: ur dum, NO U, and clickb8 as "evidence"

Try not to gobble up shitty low tier b8 next time you fucking faggots.


 No.558569

>>558563

Being different doesn't mean being wrong. It is possible that liberals did indeed attract high IQ individuals in the past, but they no longer do now.

People change their political affiliations and beliefs many times over their lives in response to events, yet their IQs remain the same. Personally, I was heavily liberal throughout college– I even wrote for my school's paper with communist leanings– but slowly shifted after graduating.


 No.558572

>>558562

>Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals? A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes.

>The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood.

>I.Q., or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized tests, but whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among psychologists.

>Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology at the university and the study’s lead author, said the finding represented evidence of a vicious cycle: People of low intelligence gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, which stress resistance to change and, in turn, prejudice, he told LiveScience.

>Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies? Because such ideologies feature “structure and order” that make it easier to comprehend a complicated world, Dodson said. “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice,” he added.

>Dr. Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist, echoed those sentiments.

>“Reality is complicated and messy,” he told The Huffington Post in an email. “Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/intelligence-study-links-prejudice_n_1237796.html

https://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

The study in question:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797611421206


 No.558574

>>558569

IQ changes drastically over a lifetime. Even the time of day, setting of the test, mood of the test taker and attitude of the test giver affects IQ results.

>It is possible that. . . .

A hypothesis needs to be tested and confirmed in order to have validity.

Reals over feels.


 No.558575

File: d09745b5a8091fc⋯.png (71.71 KB, 240x180, 4:3, lust parabolas.png)

>>558120

More useful too.


 No.558578

>>558572

In the very same link you posted

>"less intelligent types might be attracted to liberal “simplifying ideologies” as well as conservative ones. "

Really, what could be simpler than "Liberals are right and conservatives are wrong because liberals have higher IQ."


 No.558584

>>558578

>might

In other words the propensity tends to go the other way.


 No.558585

File: 2fca1c6b99f3dd7⋯.gif (1.16 MB, 560x372, 140:93, snake step on liberty.gif)

>>558563

>classical liberals are people who're socially leftist but believe in the free market

No. Just no.


 No.558587

>>558585

That's how Carl defines it.


 No.558588

>>558574

>Why might less intelligent people be drawn to conservative ideologies? Because such ideologies feature “structure and order” that make it easier to comprehend a complicated world, Dodson said. “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice,” he added.

>"Might…"

It seems you have no problems with and unverified hypothesis if it echoes your sentiments.


 No.558590

>>558574

>drastically

https://www.livescience.com/36143-iq-change-time.html

>Yes, your IQ can change over time. But [IQ] tests give you the same answer to a very substantial extent, even over a period of year. The older you are, the more stable your test score will be.


 No.558592

>>558588

>Despite their important implications for interpersonal behaviors and relations, cognitive abilities have been largely ignored as explanations of prejudice. We proposed and tested mediation models in which lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice, an effect mediated through the endorsement of right-wing ideologies (social conservatism, right-wing authoritarianism) and low levels of contact with out-groups.

The "might" I was pointing out indicated a possibility that has simply been untested.


 No.558593

>>558587

And it's fucking wrong because classical liberalism has absolutely nothing to do with modern liberalism. Classical liberalism is much more conservative than liberal - it's about free markets, small government, and individual rights. Modern liberalism is about big government, a highly-controlled economy, and individual rights forfeited to the collective. Just because classical liberalism doesn't give the death penalty for gay butt sex, in no way does that make it leftist.


 No.558594

>>558584

> "Might means 'It tends to be the opposite'"

Liberal illiterates lol.


 No.558595

>>558593

Take it up with Carl.


 No.558596

>>558594

Here it means, "untested hypothesis."


 No.558597

>>558590

IQ may stabilize over a lifetime, but it is in no way set in stone.

Children who test as child prodigies can grow up to be teenagers of average intelligence.


 No.558602

File: 542c35335e1f2bf⋯.jpg (78.2 KB, 900x675, 4:3, asunyan.jpg)

>>558597

I have consistently been in the top 1 percentile in almost every test I have taken in my life. Does this mean that my political opinions are always better than those below me?

If so, you people are in for a rude surprise.


 No.558604

>>558572

>Are racists dumb? Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals? A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario suggests the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes.

Answer the following:

1.) Are blacks dumber than white according to IQ?

2.) Is knowing that blacks are dumber racist?

3.) Does interpreting objective data mean you are dumb?


 No.558606

File: 9850babab869e33⋯.jpg (5.58 KB, 220x165, 4:3, chinkna.jpg)

>>558572

> "Are racists dumb?… the answer to both questions may be a qualified yes."

Answer the following questions:

1.) Do niggers have significantly lower iq than whites.

2.) Does knowing this make you racist?

3.) Does saying this truth make you racist?

4.) Does interpreting objective data make you racist?

Daily reminder that China, one of the most racist countries in this planet, has very high IQ.


 No.558614

>>558584

Are you seriously denying that simple liberal ideologies don't attract idiots? Are you this delusional?


 No.558616

>>558606

1. 15 points lower on average, depending on the type of test.

2. no

3. no

4. no

>>558614

straw man


 No.558617

>>558616

Look up what a straw man is, retard.

Answer another: "What does racist mean?"


 No.558626

>>557961

I distinctly remember an email in the Clinton leak talking about how much they loved a dumb unthinking populous.


 No.558628

>>558616

Do these negroes, who have less IQ, tend to vote Democrat or Republican?


 No.558630

>>558616

So saying, "Whites are intellectually superior to blacks." isn't racist?


 No.558632

>>558626

Source? Not that it's inconceivable.

I do remember Trump saying he loves the poorly educated after winning the NV primary.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/02/24/donald-trump-nevada-poorly-educated/80860078/


 No.558633

>>558628

>>558630

Like I said up thread, you guys cling to the black/white IQ performance gap like a drowning man to a raft.

It reeks of desperation and insecurity.


 No.558634

The thing is that a higher IQ is no justification for your political ideology. There have been heaps of high-IQ philosophers on every side of the political spectrum. While IQ is important, it's not the be-all and end-all. There are heaps more psychological traits that are important besides IQ, IQ basically just being the efficiency of your brain. In a lot of cases, high-IQ just gives you the oppurtunity to internalise whatever sophistry you're educated in at the time. So you can have this crowd of rabid college-educated social justice warriors who will do all kinds of mental gymnastics as to why blacks and immigrants commit more crime, while Republicans are more down to earth and have a healthy caution when it comes to different races and ethnic groups. IQ is not the same as common sense, and I'd say that Republicans have more.

Also, and interesting article: Republicans are more informed than Democrats: http://cfif.org/v/index.php/commentary/54-state-of-affairs/2339-republicans-more-informed-than-democrats-according-to-pew-research


 No.558635

>>558634

>immigrants commit more crime

For starters, that's wrong.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/26/us/trump-illegal-immigrants-crime.html


 No.558636

>>558633

Stop trying to run away and answer the question.

Is saying, "Whites are intellectually superior to blacks."?


 No.558637

>>558633

>>558633

>>558633

Stop trying to run away and answer the question.

Is saying, "Whites are intellectually superior to blacks." racist?

Your attempts to shift the discussion reeks of desperation and fear. Deep down you know, the racists are right, and if they are right, the research that says racist are dumber is wrong.


 No.558638

File: 171dfe43d5bfda1⋯.png (4.96 KB, 314x300, 157:150, USA_2009._Percent_of_adult….png)

>>558120

Technically true in this specific example, but it's comparing Mexican immigrants to the average native born, of which many are black people who commit a disproportionate amount of crime. When you look at third-world immigrants coming to mostly white countries in Europe, it's a different story. And the fact is that second generation plus immigrants commit crime much more than native whites. You might not see a massive crime rates straight away - as immigrants are careful to naturalise into their target country - but it gradually increase criminality over the decades as the immigrants have children. This is why there is a high correlation between racial homogeneity - in white and asian countries - and low crime.


 No.558639

>>558049

Look at you licking the anus of your masters. Kneel down


 No.558641

>>558638

Meant for >>558635

What I'd say about >>558638 though is that intelligence does not equal ability; some people are smart and useless. Many businessmen and entrepreneurs have only average intelligence, but they have other skills and industriousness that makes them very productive and successful people. Intellectuals are salty because they don't make as much as businessmen, but for most people, they are more interested in toothpaste and potatoes rather than knowledge in obscure areas.


 No.558642


 No.558643

>>558637

The statement is worded in such a way as to get a rise out of some one. I'd say it's a troll statement more than anything.

Blacks have an average IQ that is one standard deviation lower than white IQs. Depending on how you explain this, what you use to justify with it, ect. points toward or away from racist views.

But the knowledge itself in neutral.


 No.558646

>>557985

When in doubt, add parenthesis to remove ambiguity.


 No.558647

>>558638

Then explain the low crime rate in Bahrain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Bahrain


 No.558648

>>558643

Why is it a troll statement?

Is saying, "Blacks are more likely to commit crimes than whites." also a troll statement?


 No.558649

>>558648

>Why is it a troll statement?

The wording is inflammatory and chosen to cause offence.


 No.558650

>>558649

But why, if it is nothing but the truth?

How is it any different from saying "Liberals are more Educated."?


 No.558660

>>558650

There is a subtle difference between "Whites are intellectually superior to blacks." And. "A performance gap exists in IQ tests between black and white races."

The former implies a set conclusion - white superiority. The later states the fact without drawing an inference.

The gap could be due to genetics, culture, test anxiety, stereotype threat, self-fulfilling prophecy, any number of things.


 No.558664

>>558660

*latter


 No.558666

>>558646

20/5( ( (2*2) ) )

Better?


 No.558668

>>558660

Are you saying that IQ tests cannot determine intellectual superiority?


 No.558682

news bump 7


 No.558684

>>558668

They are what they are. The scope of what they encompass is limited. That's true if you're testing different races or different ideologies.


 No.558685

>>558682

Nice contribution faggot.


 No.558687

>>558647

>approximately 65% of violent crime and theft are committed by foreign citizens residing in Bahrain

Weren't you trying to argue that immigration didn't increase crime?


 No.558688

File: 4568fcdfc4811d8⋯.gif (712.24 KB, 500x500, 1:1, Bong dong.gif)

If this thread proves anything it's that learning programs won''t make a difference because the general population is retarded. Mass extermination and elitism will save the human race.


 No.558689

>>558688

Sorry I meant to say "inherently retarded."


 No.558694

>>558687

Immigrants have lower crime rates then the gen. pop. in North America. This does vary in different parts of the world. I used Bahrain as a counter example to, "there is a high correlation between racial homogeneity - in white and asian countries - and low crime."

Also worth noting the immigrants to that multiethnic country are mostly Asian.


 No.558761

>>558694

>Much of the crime in the nation is committed by the large South Asian population of guest workers. Though small in size, there is a growing underground drug market in the country.[3] According to Emile Nakhleh, approximately 65% of violent crime and theft are committed by foreign citizens residing in Bahrain

This isn't a counter example, but a supporting one. Did you actually read it?


 No.558764

>>558694

Switzerland is one of the most Racially Homogeneous countries in the planet. It is also one of the safest.


 No.558765

>>558761

You left out the lead sentence, fool.

>There is a low rate of crime in Bahrain.

Bahrain isn't racially homogenous nor is it a white or Asian country.

Counterexample stands.


 No.558766

>>558764

Those two facts are incidental not causal.


 No.558767

>>558765

You left out the entire left of the page.

>Bahrain is a destination country for men and women trafficked for the purposes of involuntary servitude and commercial sexual exploitation. Men and women from Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia migrate voluntarily to Bahrain to work as laborers or domestic servants where some face conditions of involuntary servitude such as unlawful withholding of passports, restrictions on movements, non-payment of wages, threats and physical or sexual abuse. Women from Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Southeast Asian country like Thailand and North African nation like Morocco are trafficked to Bahrain for the purpose of commercial sexual exploitation.[7]

Threat of terrorist attack is a matter of concern.[8] The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) of the Government of Australia advised travelers "to exercise a high degree of caution in Bahrain" due to high threat of terrorism. According to the DFAT, terrorists can target shopping areas, supermarkets, embassies, hotels, restaurants, clubs, cinemas and theaters, schools, places of worship, outdoor recreation events and tourist areas.[2]

So a country which attributes its safety to the teaching of the Quaran, is a well known destination for human slavery, and has a large threat of terrorism, is your counter example?


 No.558768

>>558694

>>558765

And yet it does nothing to prove your point to disprove my point of the correlation of racial homogeneity and low crime. Bahrain has low crime, but it's still not on the same level as Japan, Switzerland or Austria, and one or two outliers does not disprove a statement. I said racial homogeneity was correlated with low crime, I didn't say there were no countries with racial diversity that had low crime. And it's also been shown that immigrants commit more crime by your own source, which really does nothing to bolster your argument. I could go more into the case of Bahrain and argue that it's the country's strong ethnic and religious homogeneity which results in low crime, but that's irrelevant to the main argument. And really, I think that as far as crime is concerned, racial demographics is far more important the racial homogeneity - east Asian immigrants are fine. African and Hispanic immigrants are not. Despite you showing that immigrants in America purportedly don't commit crime - and this could be for a variety of reasons, such as perhaps it's the anti-immigration attitude in America and threat of deportation itself which motivates immigrants to keep of the radar in the first place - what I've shown is that their children do commit more crime, so regardless of what the first generation does it's in America's best interest to keep them out.


 No.558772

>>558766

> It's just a coincidence!

>I'm going to declare that it isn't the cause at all.

>I'm not going to even entertain the idea that it might be the cause.

Prove that the homogeneous population has nothing to do with the low crime. It's just a coincidence with Japan too, I'm sure.


 No.558773

>>558767

Name one country that has zero crime.


 No.558774

>>558773

There is none, but that doesn't matter. I can name many countries that aren't described as having a high risk of terrorism.

See

>>558768


 No.558776

File: 8257b0747464cb2⋯.jpg (6.63 KB, 224x225, 224:225, watamote.jpg)

>>558773

> My link which says immigrants commit most of the crimes means foreigners are fine!

If you want a real counterexample, look for a country with a white homogeneous population with high crime. Finding a few diverse islands (your island countryis 70% Shia Muslim) doesn't mean anything.


 No.558778

>>558768

>homogeneity was correlated with low crime

Correlation does not equal causation.

>I could go more into the case of Bahrain and argue that it's the country's strong ethnic and religious homogeneity which results in low crime

Bahrain is very ethnically diverse.


 No.558780

>>558772

Japan has some of the strictest gun laws in the world, especially in regard to hand guns.


 No.558781

>>558778

What, diverse in the different subtypes of sandniggers? Regardless, 70% of people are Muslim; they are not culturally diverse. And who cares? I've already told you that one or two outliers doesn't disprove anything.

>correlation doesn't equal causation

Nice cop out. Are you even trying any more?

>>558780

Switzerland has some of the best gun rights in the world. Also some of the lowest crime in the world. Brazil has very strict gun control, and some of the highest crime and murder rates in the world. The is zero correlation between guns and murder, in fact if anything, it's inverse.


 No.558782

>>558776

>country with a white homogeneous population with high crime

Russia.


 No.558783

File: 20f45ecd4c11366⋯.png (5.32 KB, 285x220, 57:44, verydiverse.png)

>>558778

It also does not equal the absence of causation. Correlation hints at causation.


 No.558784

File: c878ccbc0ca53fe⋯.png (3.87 KB, 272x114, 136:57, it'sabennetonad.png)

>>558778

>Bahrain is very ethnically diverse.

VERY DIVERSE


 No.558785

>>558781

They are about 50% Arab 45% Asian and 5% other.

>He thinks Muslims get along.


 No.558786

>>558785

>there are two whole different races

>the South Asian immigrants commit much more crime than the native mudslimes

>the sandniggers don't commit crime because they are religious fundamentalists

>but they can still use the "domestic servants" and exploited people who're trafficked into the country for their outlets for sex and violence

>high risk of terrorism

>human rights classified as "dismal

From your source: "Charisse Tia Maria Coston and Freda Adler in their book Victimizing Vulnerable Groups analyzed the reasons behind the low crime rate in Bahrain. The society of Bahrain follows the teachings of the Qur'an; the Qur'an influences political, economic and social environment. Islam, which is most important in the structure of Bahraini society, teaches wrongdoings will result in downfall of societies and try to uproot crime by exerting influence upon human conscience.[5] This internalization of the religion of Islam is analyzed as a cause behind law-abiding behavior among Bahraini people where violation of law is considered violation of the principles of God.[6]"

"Bahrain is a destination country for men and women trafficked for the purposes of involuntary servitude and commercial sexual exploitation. Men and women from Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia migrate voluntarily to Bahrain to work as laborers or domestic servants where some face conditions of involuntary servitude such as unlawful withholding of passports, restrictions on movements, non-payment of wages, threats and physical or sexual abuse. Women from Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Southeast Asian country like Thailand and North African nation like Morocco are trafficked to Bahrain for the purpose of commercial sexual exploitation.[7]"

Multicultural paradise!


 No.558788

>>558786

Bahraini people are ethnically diverse. Shia Bahrainis are divided into two main ethnic groups: Baharna and Ajam. Most Shia Bahrainis are ethnic Baharna. The Ajam are ethnic Persian Shias. Shia Persians form large communities in Manama and Muharraq. A tiny minority of Shia Bahrainis are ethnic Hasawis from Al-Hasa.

Sunni Bahrainis are mainly divided into two main ethnic groups: Arabs (al Arab) and Huwala. Sunni Arabs are the most influential ethnic group in Bahrain, they hold most government positions and the Bahraini monarchy are Sunni Arabs. Sunni Arabs have traditionally lived in areas such as Zallaq, Muharraq, Riffa and Hawar islands. The Huwala are descendants of Sunni Iranians; some of them are Sunni Persians,[242][243] while others Sunni Arabs.[244][245] There are also Sunnis of Baloch origin. Most Bahrainis of African origin come from east Africa and have traditionally lived in Muharraq Island and Riffa

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahrain

The Wikipedia link quotes someone going on about The Quran. I don't find that to be a compelling answer. I'd look to policing policies.

They have other problems but we are talking about crime and racial homogeny.


 No.558789

>>558780

That must be why Brazil is so safe and Switzerland is so dangerous.


 No.558790

File: fb49a5a65087b52⋯.jpg (32.52 KB, 300x300, 1:1, bannana.jpg)

>>558788

They have two sand-nigger flavours. They are totally very ethically diverse.


 No.558791

>>558789

Gun death rates in Switzerland are very high due to suicide.

I think everything you believe is wrong.


 No.558792

File: 4629abea98f5b5d⋯.jpg (59.62 KB, 781x278, 781:278, guns 4564.jpg)

>>558791

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_suicide_rate

Oy vey! Because people kill themselves with guns and not with other means, guns are evil! Ban evil baby-killing guns that cause people to kill themselves!


 No.558793

>>558792

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Firearms are the most common method of suicide among young men in Switzerland. From March 2003 through February 2004, the number of Swiss soldiers was halved as a result of an army reform (Army XXI), leading to a decrease in the availability of guns nationwide. The authors investigated the patterns of the overall suicide rate and the firearm suicide rate before and after the reform.

METHOD:

Using a naturalistic study design, the authors compared suicide rates before (1995–2003) and after the intervention (2004–2008) in the affected population (men ages 18–43) and in two comparison groups (women ages 18–44 and men ages 44–53). Data were received from the Swiss Federal Statistical Office. Interrupted time series analysis was used to control for preexisting temporal trends. Alternative methods (Poisson regression, autocorrelation analysis, and surrogate data tests) were used to check validity.

RESULTS:

The authors found a reduction in both the overall suicide rate and the firearm suicide rate after the Army XXI reform. No significant increases were found for other suicide methods overall. An increase in railway suicides was observed. It was estimated that 22% of the reduction in firearm suicides was substituted by other suicide methods. The attenuation of the suicide rate was not compensated for during the follow-up years. Neither of the comparison groups showed statistically significant changes in firearm suicide rate and overall suicide rate.

CONCLUSIONS:

The restriction of firearm availability in Switzerland resulting from the Army XXI reform was followed by an enduring decrease in the general suicide rate.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23897090 (paywall)


 No.558794

>>558792

Do you have any other strongly held beliefs? I'll gladly destroy those too. With science!


 No.558795

File: 481ed175c3ff274⋯.jpg (8.24 KB, 299x168, 299:168, pant.jpg)

>>558791

>>558793

> Japan has one of the highest suicide rates in the world. Far higher than Switzerland.

>Guns are strictly regulated there.

>>558794

You are shifting the topic anyway. He talked about how banning guns won't reduce crime. And you shifted to how banning guns reduce suicide . As if presenting the new topic "destroyed" the previous topic you ran away from.

You haven't destroyed anyone's beliefs. Especially not with science. All you have done is wiggle about with your sophistry.


 No.558796

File: 342c46c41d036fd⋯.png (44.51 KB, 630x357, 30:17, man.png)

>>558794

> yfw when you post unrelated social science papers you haven't even read because of a paywall and think you're being scientific.


 No.558797

>>558795

He didn't say crime he specifically said safety.

But if you want to talk about crime only.

>Japan has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

>Guns are strictly regulated there.


 No.558798

>>558796

Duh, I'm not going to read full papers in order to argue with idiots. If you want to read it you can access it from you're University library. But if you're white and racist you are probably too dumb to go to university. :(


 No.558799

File: 0cfc4b5bc46ff52⋯.png (37.51 KB, 400x299, 400:299, noguns.png)

>>558797

You being hypocritical again.

>Switzerland has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

>It has dense gun ownership.

>(BUT THINK ABOUT THE SUICIDES!)

>Japan has one of the lowest crime rates in the world.

> It also has some of the highest suicide rates in the world.

>Guns are strictly regulated there.

>(We're not talking about suicides here!)


 No.558800

File: 7b5881c63f489f0⋯.jpg (37.6 KB, 600x420, 10:7, contempt 645667.jpg)

>>558793

>Japan - some of the strictest gun control laws in the world - world leader in suicide

>Switzerland - lower suicide rates than neighbouring countries and low overall

>this one study that shows a slight increase in suicide coincided with a reduce in guns validates my whole viewpoint that guns should be banned and only the government should have them

>Do you have any other strongly held beliefs? I'll gladly destroy those too. With science!

>you're white and racist you are probably too dumb to go to university. :(

>>>/r/atheismplus

You are so shit at arguing. Every time you are rebutted you shift the goalposts to even more obscure points, in which you will cherry pick one statistic and act like that definitively proves your entire argument. Go back to your left-wing circlejerk, wherever you came from.

>>558797

>racial homogeneity is not correlated with low crime

>look see, my one country proves this

>strict gun control is associated with low crime

>look, my one racially homogenous country proves this

Holy shit, you are a retard.


 No.558801

>>558798

>>558798

“The more guns a nation has, the less criminal activity.”

http://www.beliefnet.com/news/articles/harvard-university-study-reveals-astonishing-link.aspx

By the way, I've already graduated from a very prestigious university. If you're non-white and racist, then I guess you think that is some sort of grand achievement.


 No.558802

>>558799

Here's what both countries have in common:

Strict HANDGUN laws.

Not a lot of crime is committed with hunting rifles.


 No.558803

File: 128c3210b7ca241⋯.jpg (5.46 KB, 299x208, 23:16, thXO00EUP9.jpg)

>>558801

>I've already graduated from a very prestigious university

Clown or barber?


 No.558804

>>558803

Computer Science. Your infatuation and worship of university tells me you haven't graduated yet. Are you in highschool?


 No.558805

File: 6491b48eb77b627⋯.jpg (11.9 KB, 251x201, 251:201, time to stop posting.jpg)

>>558802

>Unlike in most other European countries, the Czech gun legislation also permits a citizen to carry a concealed weapon for self-defense – 240,000 out of some 300,000 legal gun owners have >concealed carry permit. Vast majority of Czech gun owners possess their firearms for protection, with hunting and sport shooting being less common

homicide rate per 100,000:

>czech republic 0.75

>Australia: 0.98

>UK: 0.92

>Germany: 0.85


 No.558806

>>558804

Was it ITT Technical Institute?


 No.558807

>>558800

>my whole viewpoint that guns should be banned and only the government should have them

Straw man. Ad absurdum.

>racial homogeneity is not correlated with low crime

In some regions it is, in some regions the opposite is true.


 No.558808

>>558806

Are you in Highschool?

>>558807

Are you now admitting that gun-control doesn't prevent crime, and that when you brought up gun control for being the reason Japan was safe, you were just being retarded?


 No.558809

>>558807

The university genius here doesn't understand what correlation means.


 No.558811

>>558809

In some countries, ethnically/racially diverse geographical areas have higher crime rates compared to homogeneous areas, and in other countries, it is the other way around.

Sometimes there is a correlation sometimes there isn't. Overall I would say White or Asian homogeny is not the x factor in crime.


 No.558812

>>558811

Find me one country with a large African population that also has low crime. One.


 No.558813

>>558808

Mainly I brought (hand)gun control in Japan to offer a alternative explanation to their crime rate being low due to racial purity.


 No.558814

>>558812

You fucked up. African doesn't mean black, and this word game will be used to toy with your perception and statistics.


 No.558816

>>558812

Either way. Let start with black pop.

>In 2012, Census showed that black people constituted 9.26 percent of total population.

>Gun crime is virtually nonexistent in Cuba and murder rates are below those of most Latin American countries.

Drug traffic is high though, thanks Florida.


 No.558817

File: b9d936b0816cea4⋯.png (39.06 KB, 255x284, 255:284, pls stop.png)

>>558816

>government doesn't release statistics about crime

>see, crime is low!


 No.558818

THIS IS WHY THEY ARE AFRAID OF US, THERE ARE SO MANY BLACK PEOPLE AND WE ARE SUPER SMART AND STRONG. THAT'S WHY THEY KEEP US IN POVERTY SO WE WON'T RISE. BUT WE WILL RISE MORE GREATER & STRONGER.


 No.558821

>>558816

>Crime statistics aren't available.

The line in wikipedia that says their crime is below other taco countries isn't even sourced. https://www.osac.gov/Pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=12233 doesn't mention this.

I didn't bother to check the sources of the following link, just like you didn't really check the wikipedia sources, but it tells a different story.

http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/profiles/Cuba/Crime

>Though a relatively small nation, Cuba is prone to a high degree of violent crime, with figures published in 2002 showing that there were 348 murders committed by youths, placing the country 15th amongst 73 nations. In fact, the rate of murders by youths per capita is the 16th highest on earth, at 9.6 per 100,000 of the population. It may surprise you to learn that the death penalty is still in use in Cuba, but sparingly so as just 5 executions took place in 2007.

The example you gave for a safe country is, "prone to a high degree of violent crime"?


 No.558822

>>558496

20/(5*(2.2))= 20/11 not 1

20/5 * (2.2)= 8.8 not 16


 No.558824

>>557961

Do I need to dig out the Average IQ of Trump voters v Hillary voters again


 No.558825

>>558821

Cuba has a large black population and is renown for a low crime rate.

>The country had 477 homicides in 2012 or a rate of 4.2 per 100,000 people, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. That’s the third lowest homicide rate in the hemisphere after Canada and Chile, and it’s dramatically lower than its neighbors. Jamaica, for example, had a homicide rate of 39.3 per 100,000, followed by the Bahamas with 29.8 and Puerto Rico with 26.5. Mainland United States, by comparison, had a rate of 4.7 homicides per 100,000.

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/cuba/article7039331.html#storylink=cpy

Anything else you want to bring up is just moving the goal posts,


 No.558826

>>558824

I'd like to see such a thing if you have it.


 No.558828

>>558816

>>558825

You do know that the very same link you posted talks about how the government covers up the crime statistics, right?


 No.558829

>>558828

It notes it. They also note, "the meager data that exists paints a picture that sets Cuba apart" in regard to crime rates.


 No.558830

File: 1b64db09e483091⋯.png (54.48 KB, 760x548, 190:137, lmao.png)

>>558825

>>558829

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

Using the same UNDOC report your link posted:

Cuba has marginally lower homicide rates compared to the US even if it has a smaller proportion of niggers. (9.3% vs 13.3%)

Being better than Jamaica and Puerto Rico doesn't make you

renowned for a low crime rate


 No.558831

>>558825

Cuba has a 4.7% homicide rate with fewer niggers. And this is with your article saying that the government covers crimes up. The data sets Cuba apart from its deathtrap neighbors, but to say that it is renowned for its low crime rate is a deceptive lie, and you know it.


 No.558832

File: 8604e3a36a8c85a⋯.gif (296.58 KB, 498x354, 83:59, i'msosmarti'mgoingtouniver….gif)

>>558829

He asked for ONE country and cuba is the best you could come up with.

>No published data

>Less niggers than the united states

>The only data to support your case is a relatively low homicide rate

>Which is almost the same as the US.


 No.558833

>Violent Crime-

>Still (almost) unheard of - against tourists, that is. There are few places that can boast the almost 100% success rate for solving violent crime that the Cuban police can. Justice is swift and efficient.

https://www.tripadvisor.com/Travel-g147270-c140774/Cuba:Caribbean:Crimes.And.Scams.In.Cuba.html


 No.558834

>>558831

Forget the %, just 4.7

The point still stands. You couldn't even find one example.


 No.558835

>>558834

>In fact, the island is renowned for its incredibly low levels of violent crime.

http://latincorrespondent.com/2016/03/cuba-a-country-free-from-violent-crime/#4jK8d0Ciu2EgI6Uq.99


 No.558837

File: feaed35b3f745e5⋯.jpg (97.48 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, newlow.jpg)

>>558833

>>558833

>>558835

> "Cuba has a low crime rate because it's homicide rate is 4.2 according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime"

The Homicide rate is 4.7

>"Trip advisor says the justice is swift and efficient!"

"The police response/capability is below average"

https://www.osac.gov/Pages/ContentReportDetails.aspx?cid=12233

>But my tourist pamphlets and travel agents say the country crime free and safe for tourists!

You have been pathetic for a while, but this is a new low.


 No.558838


 No.558840

the most important component for containing the level of social violence could be the care given to children. Like former vice president Carlos Lage told the UN, 200 million children around the world sleep in the streets – but none of them is Cuban.

This explains why there are no adolescent hired guns, gang members, drug dealers or gangs of teenaged robbers in Cuba. It’s natural that these don’t exist since there’s not a single street child; all youth are under the protection of their families or state institutions.

The most effective incubator of violent offenders is the social violence suffered by millions of children around the world, those who are abandoned by their parents, sleeping in parks, eating garbage, sexually assaulted and sniffing glue.

http://www.havanatimes.org/?p=72253


 No.558841

>>558832

There are not a lot of countries with large black populations. America has the largest black population outside of African counties. You are talking about a very tiny pool of countries here.


 No.558843

>>558840

> An article that doesn't show us how safe cuba is

> Assumes cuba's safety without any data.

> D-does this mean I won guys?

Another article completely unrelated to what is being talked about, but you are going to pretend like it is. Just like the Switzerland suicide article.

Your Homicide rate is wrong.

It has a smaller proportion of niggers compared to America yet it has almost the same homicide rate. You brought up the Homicide rates.

All you have to support you are advertisements for tourists and anecdotes. Zero data. The government sources contradict your advertisements which you presented as data.

>Justice is swift and efficient.

>"The police response/capability is below average"

Go on, surf google, find more blogposts then copy paste "cuba is safe" here like you are quoting a scholarly article.

He asked you to find one country, and you couldn't do it.


 No.558844

File: b054b42f550bb42⋯.png (452.14 KB, 1140x1689, 380:563, 6cd568.png)

>>558838

<college

>educated


 No.558845

>>558843

Meh, ask a stupid question. . . .

There are very few countries with large black populations.

>It has a smaller proportion of niggers compared to America

ALL countries outside of Africa have a smaller portion of blacks than America. Even a lot of African nations have less blacks then America.


 No.558846

>Naples, FL

>one of the richest cities in America

>not using common core

Of course (((they))) aren't using their indoctrination protocol for their own.


 No.558847


 No.558848

Now let's switch it around.

>According to CIA Factbook, 97 percent of Argentina's population is white

Yet.

>Argentina has a problem with violent crime. According to the UN, in 2002, it had the 4th highest rates of manslaughter in the world

>The country also had the 15th highest number of crimes reported, with 1.3 million.


 No.558849

File: c111cc8d87bd74d⋯.jpg (70.19 KB, 743x505, 743:505, ftsbs-large.jpg)

>>558268

nice thumbnail faggot


 No.558850

File: f44374b24729099⋯.png (29.74 KB, 200x295, 40:59, a24.png)

>>557978

>according to commoncore the correct answer is 16 and 1

And would be corre..

>…and 1

wat


 No.558851

Russia has a white population of around 121 million and one of the highest murder rates in the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Russia


 No.558853

>>558840

Wow that's a really touching story, but it has nothing to do with the debate at hand. And I can tell you from personal experience as someone who was a ward of the state, it's not a fucking nice experience. The carers don't treat you as their own children, they're narcissistic and abusive, and they take on way too many kids and do it for the money. That article is vomit-inducing apologetics for an oppressive socialist government, based on nothing but government propaganda of cherry-picked statistics.

>>558845

African population of Norway: 88,764

African population of Sweden: 103,077

African population of Finland <20,000

crime index of Norway: 44.99

crime index of Sweden: 49.35

crime index of Finland: 23.19

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/rankings_by_country.jsp

It's like you can predict crime based on the percentage of black people of a country to a tee.

>>558851

>one of the highest murder rates in the world

uh, no.

Did you mean one of the highest murder rates out of white countries? (are slavs even white?)


 No.558854

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10330241/Teacher-who-visited-Cuba-due-to-low-crime-rate-strangled-in-hotel-room.html

LOL.

>come to Cuba. It has really low crime. The government (who doesn't actually release any statistics) said so!


 No.558855

File: ec2fc2a7f688156⋯.png (101.86 KB, 476x581, 68:83, 1455423293325.png)

>>558072

You can't think on you your own if you don't know how to think idiot


 No.558856

>>558853

At the beginning of the 20th century, Russia had a higher homicide rate – nearly ten per 100,000 people per year.[2] In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the rate remained stable and it was lower than in the United States.[2] There was a rise in the homicide rate in the mid-1960s and 1970s which peaked in 1980, and then slowly declined in until 1985, and then it fell rapidly in 1986–1987.[2]

Until the late 1980s, homicide rates in Russia were nearly similar to that in the United States.[2] The increase in homicide rate in Russia began slightly earlier than 1990,[3] and rose throughout the 1990s.[2] Homicides were more common in Russia than in the Baltic states in 1991 and nearly doubled in frequency by 1994–1995.[4] In 2003, the homicide rate in Russia was among the highest in the world.

At the beginning of the 20th century, Russia had a higher homicide rate – nearly ten per 100,000 people per year.[2] In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the rate remained stable and it was lower than in the United States.[2] There was a rise in the homicide rate in the mid-1960s and 1970s which peaked in 1980, and then slowly declined in until 1985, and then it fell rapidly in 1986–1987.[2]

Until the late 1980s, homicide rates in Russia were nearly similar to that in the United States.[2] The increase in homicide rate in Russia began slightly earlier than 1990,[3] and rose throughout the 1990s.[2] Homicides were more common in Russia than in the Baltic states in 1991 and nearly doubled in frequency by 1994–1995.[4] In 2003, the homicide rate in Russia was among the highest in the world.

At the beginning of the 20th century, Russia had a higher homicide rate – nearly ten per 100,000 people per year.[2] In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the rate remained stable and it was lower than in the United States.[2] There was a rise in the homicide rate in the mid-1960s and 1970s which peaked in 1980, and then slowly declined in until 1985, and then it fell rapidly in 1986–1987.[2]

Until the late 1980s, homicide rates in Russia were nearly similar to that in the United States.[2] The increase in homicide rate in Russia began slightly earlier than 1990,[3] and rose throughout the 1990s.[2] Homicides were more common in Russia than in the Baltic states in 1991 and nearly doubled in frequency by 1994–1995.[4] In 2003, the homicide rate in Russia was among the highest in the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_Russia


 No.558857

File: a7bc31555c09c02⋯.gif (809.87 KB, 500x281, 500:281, 1458696575549.gif)

>>558120

>Stephen Hawking


 No.558858

>>558853

>Numbeo is the world’s largest database of user contributed data about cities and countries worldwide

Seems legit.


 No.558860

File: 2ae4bcdf810f39e⋯.jpg (11.07 KB, 250x201, 250:201, cat931749777.jpg)

>>558841

>There are not a lot of countries with large black populations

<This is what liberals actually believe


 No.558861

>>558856

Slaves are hardly white. Russia is the backwater of Europe and it always has been.

>>558858

The statistics go against my opinion, therefore they must be wrong


 No.558862

>>558861

>Thinks user reported anything counts as statistics.

learn2STEM


 No.558865

File: 979f569da091b28⋯.jpg (14.42 KB, 211x295, 211:295, th2SGY4ZWY.jpg)

>>558853

>I can tell you from personal experience as someone who was a ward of the state

Why did your mom throw you away? Where you ugly?


 No.558868

File: 427ecedc2249b0d⋯.jpg (7.24 KB, 186x271, 186:271, politegiggle.jpg)

>>558862

>He thinks any of this social science bullshit is STEM.

KEK


 No.558870

>>557957

1. niggers

2. teachers

3. idiots in general

School should not be a universal thing.

Serfs have no need for it, and just slow down the class.

Shit teachers should be hanged from lampposts around the town.

A select group of high quality students with high quality teachers assigned to them.

The rest can go through a government programme to train them to operate factory line machinery and clean toilets.


 No.558891

news bump 5


 No.558902

>>558838

Anon was asking for IQ comparisons, not education levels. Oh wait, you can't tell the difference because you voted for Hillary, you fucking potato.


 No.558903

>>558838

What everyone already knew


 No.558909

>>558851

Ethnic slavs aren't white. Read what Hitler had to say about them and you will understand why their country is shit.


 No.558911

File: fb7ff54b805a965⋯.png (395.11 KB, 707x661, 707:661, restricts my freedoms.png)

>>558585

>No. Just no.

This. Classical Liberalism means that you believe in upholding a constitutional republic with a small federalist state that exists for the purpose of:

1) Ensuring civil liberties are administered without hindrance across the individual states, keeping them responsible to abiding by our constitution

2) Preventing unmanageable confederacies from being formed

3) Keeping the states from going to war with each other, or screwing each other over legally; keeping diplomacy between them

4) To defend collectively against all enemies who might cross our borders

This is basic fucking US Government. If the schools weren't controlled by the federal government (much outside it's realm of purpose) we wouldn't be studying all the 20th/21st century hoo-haw that has been duct taped to our great nation over the years. instead we would be starting with basic history, and then we would read The Federalist in it's entirety, the final Constitution in it's entirety (not just the Bill of Rights) and we'd stop lyng to people by saying that our country is supposed to be a democracy when this couldn't be further from the truth.

More confusion about the term "classical liberal" comes from eh fact we spend so much time complaining about "liberals" instead of saying "leftists." Actual liberals identify with being "right-wing" now, an truth be told Classical Liberalism is a right-wing ideology. The Marxist leftist menace we face today are not liberals in the slightest, and the sooner we stop calling them liberals and start calling them out for the pinkos they are, the better off we will be.

t. Self identified Classical Liberal/Libertarian


 No.558912

>>558911

>To defend collectively against all enemies who might cross our borders

That means keeping out Mexicans and Muslims.


 No.558915

File: d36a2915d4da20e⋯.png (459.87 KB, 750x1020, 25:34, d36a2915d4da20ec33ca4ccd39….png)

>>558912

>That means keeping out Mexicans and Muslims.

Yes. The Constitution only extends to citizens of our country. Having the right to be a traveler without interference does not extend across borders, as they are governed by those who don't uphold the same constitutional rights. Of course, this works both ways. Anyone who wishes to come here legally should be allowed to do so, but illegals do not belong here, and it is 100% the Federal Governments job to keep them out (a job they are not doing.)


 No.558917

>>558496

wtf kind of nigger logic is this? Those 2 equations along the top are not equivalent. I seriously hope this anon was just trolling and isn't actually retarded.


 No.559187

anti-slide 3




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 3d / asmr / biz / creep / s / strek / turul / wooo ]