dc51a5 No.3625
Hey guys, I appreciate your ambition, and think you have a good idea as long as you don't turn violent, but I see one major problem, even if everything else is worked out perfectly:
This new country is going to be a sausagefest. What percent of channers are female? Is it even double digits? Where are you going to find willing women? Women tend to care less about racial issues than men. Maybe you could find some recruits among Swedish women that are scared of Muslim gang rape, but not too many. I would say, at best, you could get maybe 10% female. So either you're going to hire a shitload of concubines, which would be ridiculously expensive, and wouldn't exactly help your society prosper morally, or you end up breeding with the locals. Or you practice polyandry. Do you guys have any solution to this?
On an unrelated note, how are you going to deal with the inevitable hatred coming from the international community? You'll need investment and trade eventually
92d474 No.3632
>Implying we don't have gf's
26e0b1 No.3637
>>3625First wave will be predominantly male, it's not going to be until we have established a sizable and decent standard of living that we start getting white Africans from South Africa and other regions where they are attacked by black majorities. Also if we hit a diamond mine we'll all be rich enough to afford three eastern European mail order brides.
e52469 No.3646
>>3631
But women should be encouraged to stay in the kitchen while simultaneously being told that exceptional women will always have a place to contribute
120088 No.3661
>>3631
This is NOT about investment and trade. This is about WHITE nationalism. Get lost kike. GO earn your shekels elsewhere.
dc51a5 No.3671
>>3631Just saying, in general, women are less likely to take risks. This is a major risk.
>>3632Have you talked with them about it? Are they willing to leave everything behind?
>>3637I just don't know that enough are willing to leave their countries and their families. You might get refugees from Zimbabwe, but they'll be just that: refugees, i.e., a drain on your resources.
>>3669So you think you should let in non-whites, if they're skilled and non-degenerate, but there should be a quota? Like no more than 5% black or something?
120088 No.3672
>>3669
It's NOT ABOUT investment and trade. It INVOLVES investment in trade, but it is about WHITE NATIONALISM.
120088 No.3679
>>3676
No. White only.
6b3fc2 No.3682
The man who pays the piper picks the tune.
Basically what happens or not will be determined by those actually involved in it.
d325c1 No.3704
>>3661>White nationalismYes, because inbred shitheads like Cletus from the deep south deserve to feel proud for European achievements. Americans don't deserve to feel proud for being white, because all the good shit whites invented (Culture, Literature, Academia) came from Europe. European white pride, not redneck "white" pride.
120088 No.3711
>>3704>because inbred shitheads like Cletus from the deep south Wow! Good job at being a cultural Marxist! I don't know why you liberals always try to equate southerner with inbred, but you're seriously just very wrong.
Secondly, inbreeding has been extremely common all throughout European history (as well as the history of other cultures). It was used to keep aristocracy or royalty status.
Thirdly, I agree that culture came from Europe (obviously), and so did the birth of literature and academia, but the USA has contributed an extreme amount nearly equal to that entirely of Europe over the course of its existence.
120088 No.3718
>>3714
No, it's not. The USA is only 62% white. It's a hell hole.
28077b No.3726
>>3704Now finish your thought… cmon… you can do it…
Where did Cletus and the rest of the White Americans come from? Oh? Europe, you say? Shocking.
dc51a5 No.3743
>>3704If Americans aren't white then any Africans of European descent aren't white either. Not only does that mean we can't recruit from Zimbabwe or South Africa, it means this whole project is shit.
Ignoring the fact that America has produced culture and achievements far beyond its share, if Cletus can't come then neither can Boris, because Russians and Serbs are much more redneck than southern Americans.
dc51a5 No.3744
>>3729I thought this was for non-degenerates?
cd11e2 No.3759
>>3729Sorry, it's illegal in Nambia.
d325c1 No.3790
>>3726New wordlers were those too weak to survive in Europe, or in the case of australia they were convits, human scum.
>>3743I never said americans weren't white, but your trailer trash Grand Dragon has contributed far less to White culture, than say Mark Twain, Thomas Edison or George Washington. People whose only achievement is to be white don't actually contribute that much to anything.
17edda No.4101
>>3790Agreed, but that applies everywhere. I'm sure plenty of the people on this board are German 500 pound fedora neckbeards who haven't accomplished a thing in their lives. Are they any better?
You really can't reject people based on unquantifiable things.
9d3520 No.4139
>>3790You mean, New Worlders were those individuals enterprising and intelligent enough to recognize that Europe was an authoritarian, overcrowded shithole with no chance of upward mobility. Everyone who stayed in Europe was either royalty/upper class or a total fucking moron.
8aa1dd No.4161
>>4139>authoritarian, overcrowded shithole with no chance of upward mobility.Which is nothing like the new world now, right?
177107 No.4168
>>3759N-no please don't be true.
9d3520 No.4179
>>4161That's why everyone wants to leave, anon. That's the point. The New World became shit, so eventually the best will leave again (except maybe not since there's nowhere left to go)
9d3520 No.4189
>>4168Homosexuality is illegal in basically every African state with a functioning government. Usually the punishment is death or deportation.
2f8e89 No.7568