e77ddc No.3640
I can't believe I'm seeing posters here talking about letting in other races and using the argument "it's not your genetics, it's your behavior and culture is the most important determining factor in that :^)"
I thought we were moving away from multiculturalism? Isn't that one of the biggest issues in our society? So then how the fuck can it be seriously considered to let other races in.
This is a microcosm example of how the little brother races will follow the white man. "Guys I'm [insert race] can I come?". No you really shouldn't please fuck off.
If something like 98% White population isn't a pillar of this movement, it will fail. Working for a white future is motivation, that motivation is halved when posters here talk about letting dindu's, indians, and nips in.
Disclaimer: I've worked and interacted with a lot of hardworking, peaceful Muslim browns and blacks. I would never want these people in a supposedly all white society. That goes for asians as well, I've met some intelligent and hardworking ones, they have no place either.
efb166 No.3644
Don't worry, we will act all tolerant while we are still under Namibian rule, but when we get independence all the non-whites will get the boot or the bullet.
bd737d No.3650
41a452 No.3663
>>3659
Race isn't about skin color you idiot. It is about race.
If you want to live in a multi-racial society then stay in America and get buttfucked by nigger dick please.
1b6962 No.3664
>>3640nah it's all white. the rest is shilling.
our policy is based on Orania, which is afrikaners only.
fd82fe No.3665
>>3663I'm glad this sensible thread is being agreed with. Some people are
shilling missing the point.
e77ddc No.3673
>>3659>Many people believe that a bad social environment is a major contributor to crime. They believe that if people of all races had the same education, income, and social status, there would be no race differences in crime rates. Academic research, however, shows that these differences persist even after controlling for social variables.
>Figures 14 through 17 show correlations for the 50 states and Washington, DC, between rates of violent crime reported to the police in 2002 and different social factors. In all the charts, the highest point is Washington, DC. A positive correlation can vary from zero to one, and the steeper the trend line, the higher the correlation and the stronger the association. The graph with the steepest trend line and highest correlation, Figure 14, compares violent crime rates to the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic. The other graphs show that there are relationships between violent crime and other social factors, but the correlations are much weaker.
>In fact, the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic accounts for crime rates more than four times better than the next best measure: lack of education. Furthermore, even controlling for all three measures of social disadvantage hardly changes the correlation between racial mix and crime rates. The correlation between violent crime and the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic is 0.78 even when poverty, education, and unemployment are controlled, versus 0.81 when they are not. In layman’s terms, the statistical results suggest that even if whites were just as disadvantaged as blacks and Hispanics the association between race and violent crime would still be almost as great. It may seem harsh to state it so plainly, but the single best indicator of an area’s violent crime rate is its racial/ethnic mix.http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf 41a452 No.3680
>>3678
No. White only.
f14082 No.3683
>>3640>If something like 98% White population isn't a pillar of this movement, it will failFor the sake of argument, let's say you aren't completely retarded.
How in the fuck do you plan on moving the natives out of Namibia? You're talking somewhere around 2 million people. Even if you weren't able to move out the natives, you're not going to outbreed them without bringing in millions of white people. Your plan isn't logical, and it's not going to work. Attempting to eject millions of people from their homeland is going to draw some really bad attention, and we'd be getting bombed quick.
Honestly, I don't really give a fuck about doing this with anyone else. I'll probably buy my own property over there in about ten years and chill on my farm like a king.
41a452 No.3686
>>3683No one is saying to eject them from the entirety of the country you fucking blithering idiot. We're simply talking about not letting them in our group.
e77ddc No.3689
>>3678How would you respond to scenarios like:
A) We let in 5 scholarly gentleman niggers. 3 of them breed with non black women. Do we banish the interracial couples?
B) Or say we have 6 female Japs and our white men breed them. Do we let these mulatto's and Eurasian half breeds dilute the gene pool?
>>3683Why even come to Namibia if all you want to do is sit on your throne and not give a fuck. Surely there's better places in the world for you?
41a452 No.3713
>>3707
No. It's only whites. It's a white nationalist movement.
41a452 No.3720
>>3717
That's not how it works. You're making a positive statement and I'm making a negative one. You're positing an idea. I'm not. You need a reason as to why we should allow non-whites. There's a billion reason as to why we should not.
9cce34 No.3723
The race doesn't matter because the Namibian government will forcibly intermix you. If you don;t comply the Namibian government will force you to sell your land at lower than the price you paid for it. So starting off with a white society is pointless because it will become black anyway.
41a452 No.3725
41a452 No.3734
>>3731
It wasn't really doing fine. It was substandard living besides enclave white communities.
dc7b08 No.3800
>>3644Because that totally won't lead to your removal at the hands of the democracy spreading US army.
6c6946 No.3810
I am willing to bet anything I own on theae People being /leftypol/ mongrels infiltrating this movement becausr they faol at literally everything they do.
f14082 No.3823
>>3686>not letting them in our groupMy impression of this whole deal is that it starts of as a commune type deal, and then eventually, more people come, blah blah, we Rhodesia now.
I think this whole deal is a little bit idealistic to say the least. I don't know about anyone else, but why would I want to live with all you faggots when for about 350k USD I can buy some 17k acres of farmland? Sure, a few people would be nice, but most of us can't even get along on a fucking anonymous imageboard. I can't imagine we're all just going to live in harmony when we're over there.
>>3689>Why even come to Namibia if all you want to do is sit on your throne and not give a fuck. Surely there's better places in the world for you?The point is real estate is cheap as fuck over there. For what it would cost here in the US for your average 4 bedroom, 4 bathroom house, you can have tons of acreage and privacy. Sure it's not going to be as easy over there considering it's a pretty good amount of shitty land that won't be easy to farm on, I'm sure the electrical grid is probably pretty shit, no or very shitty internet, among tons of other potential problems.
Also, I didn't literally mean I'd be a king. I'm just saying, comparatively speaking, the average person in the western world who decided to go over there would be doing quite well off the bat. The exchange rate would be in our favor. All I'm saying is that I think it would be great to go over there, pay cash for a farm, own hundreds or thousands of acres. It would be quite a change, but I think it would be worth it, assuming you didn't get AIDS or Ebola.
90fdf5 No.3925
>>3640Escaping degeneracy and preserving our culture. Doing something that has actual meaning rather than living an unfulfilling life in an unimportant job. The original European colonists didn't give a shit about race. There were shitloads of mixed-race children after they started setting up colonies in Africa. We are working to preserve our VALUES, and to escape the moral decay here.
c3c658 No.4758
yes it is white/euro only.
people saying otherwise are either shills, or newfags who are trying to deal with practical issues to do with our numbers yet too brainwashed to imagine a one race nation.
b165a3 No.4760
I smell Arminiuss in this thread.
411ae1 No.4761
>>3640Why not allow them in, but under strong and exigent guidelines? Azn girls are cute anyway, are you not going to allow them to come?
2e72bc No.4766
>>3640Dude, your idea of white-only city will fail because of just 1 reason: 99% of colonists will be male. Women are indifferent to politics, and modern women will never migrate to some shithole from their comfy hipster lifestyle. So, the only way for colony to reproduce is etheir mix with local niggers or just buy some brides from islamic states.
fd143f No.4769
>>4766There are already 50,000 white women living in Namibia though
2e72bc No.4772
>>4769I think it is hard to persuade even local white women to come live in a closed nazi village. But, of course, I might be mistaken. Anyway, I think the whole idea of colonization is too peaceful to work in this cituation.
fd143f No.4775
>>4772>>4773Go back to /leftypol/, you're clearly just here to demoralize people.
1b6962 No.4777
>>4772we're not going to colonize. read the stickies and gtfo.
also
>buying brides from islamic statestoppest of keks.
fd143f No.4781
>>4776
I presume one reproduces in Namibia the same way one does anywhere else.
1) Attract woman
2) Have sex
3) Babby
2e72bc No.4782
>>4775But I am not lefty. I just think that most people here are not suitable for farmers lifestyle and dont have any experience in it.So, instead of this peaceful colonization bullshit it is better to just gather arms and overthrow the local african government to create a state we want.
fd143f No.4785
>>4782Yes, jolly good old chap, we'll just march in there fueled by Mountain Dew and Doritos and the Namibian Military, SANDF and Angolan military too will just melt away before us.
2e72bc No.4786
>>4785You are speaking like it never happened before. African governments age getting overthrown each year, is is a pretty normal thing there.
fd143f No.4790
>>4786Governments do get overthrown all the time, but do you honestly think that South Africa and Angola wouldn't resist an attempt by whites and foreign interlopers at that to overthrow the government there?
It's a stupid idea, even if you could somehow defeat the 15,000-man Namibian Defence Forces, its neighbours would come to the country's assistance.
Just put the idea out of your mind.
1b6962 No.4793
>>4782again, we're not colonizing shit. we're starting a community under namibian law.
go fuck yourself shill.
2e72bc No.4800
>>4790No one needs to defeat their army. The idea is to overthrow the central government. Most of their general will just not give a fuck.
>>4793Why dont you stay in Europe/America then if you like to live under nigger laws so much?
fd143f No.4801
>>4800>Most of their general will just not give a fuckThe internal politics of Namibia isn't just a national issue though, its neighbours especially South Africa would be deeply alarmed if anyone especially foreigners tried to restore white minority rule by force, what do you really think they'd just sit back, relax and pretend nothing was happening? That's delusional.
8d51fd No.4803
>>3640Polls on /pol/ show that it is hardly over 50% white. A lot of them think they're special slowflakes and like to complain about what their family does. They think they're honorary whites because they don't chimp as much. And don't forget /leftypol/.
2e72bc No.4804
>>4801The modern politics are defined by money and economics, not by ideology and race. As long as we don't mess with local economics, neighboring countries will be okay with us even wearing windmills and sacrificing children to Satan.
923aa7 No.4815
I'm white, but we can offer a solution for non-whites willing to scape degeneration since there are many here, what about peaceful segregation by major ethnic groups?
3 km distance from each other:
>Germanic town
>Slavic town
>Latin town
They speak their own languages
>German, English, Afrikaner, …
>Polish, Russian, Ukrainian, …
>Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, …
This would work like a charm and we preserve each of our different cultures instead creating a melting pot, have for non-whites:
>Asian town
>Black town
And they rule by their own, each town with their own leaders, and we hep with other, with trading, doing business with other towns, etc
d0cdcf No.5256
>>4815So Jew York,London,LA,Vancouver, all multicultural zones?
brilliant!
8d51fd No.5264
>>4815>Germanic town>Slavic town>Latin town >German, English, Afrikaner, …>Polish, Russian, Ukrainian, …>Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, …Jesus Christ how horrifying. I can tell that you're clearly a savage nigger straight from the jungle. Can you really say with a straight face that those groups will want to live together and get along?