/namibia/ - A New Homeland

>>5356
>BUT MUH DUNES
>BUT MUH COASTAL MINING
>BUT MUH PORT TOWN

Namibia may even be one of the shittier choices out of all the African nations we could choose from. Nevertheless, we're looking further inland.

KEEP YOUR EYES OPEN TO LAND IN OTHER NATIONS AS WELL

sheeeet

WHile this is true It might be worth buying sooner rather than later because if we get profitable enough to buy a simple piping system we could pipe our shit into the desert which is firstly some not bad waste management, secondly years of poop in the desert would refine the soil.

>>5356

ya i get it but check out walvis bay and swakopmund..they pulled it off

>>5371
Exactly. I say we go south of the coast near SA

>>5372
>near SA

NO!


i repeat


FUCK NO!


WHY?
>>>/pol/1039116

THAT'S WHY, ARE YOU TRYING TO GET US KILLED?

>>5376
Lol, we have a South African woman in our office who doesn't have many good things to say about the 'kaffers'.

>>5381

>Some people just can't realise that not all black people are the same.

Yes, they are.

Is there a reason Guinea couldn't be an option? It's reserves are great (especially for bauxite) yet it's % of Africa's production are similar to Namibia's as investors are scared off by the ongoing conflicts and political turmoil but I think it has potential, especially as its location it pretty much the closest to the American and Brazilian coasts and much closer to the Eurozone than SA. I also may or may not have connects with a very disciplined military from an unnamed country that would be relatively cheap hire for their service but I just found this board and don't know where the groups morals lie on such subjects so please don't be offended by the suggestion.

Just saying, with enough initiative it could outdo South Africa economically and is far enough away that it wouldn't be in direct competition during the development phase.

>>5381
#NOTALLBLACKPEOPLE

>>5384
…..

Yes, let's move to the location of war and every disease known to man.

>>5387
So, the continent of Africa in general? This board is stupid as fuck honestly, of all places the cuckold moderator of this board chose some shithole in Africa? Not even Central or South America? You'd fair better in fucking Mongolia or some remote region of Russia but oh no, you decide on the continent of Africa.

>>5387
More risk but more reward. If you could cut a prime slice and make it clean and safe with western quality infrastructure/military defence and make it marketable to white people it could be very lucrative. A focus on building a strong finance sector in that location could make it the Dubai of Africa. Just spitballing here.

>>5356
>We can't just desalinate sea water for our supply
We could run a pipe, though even for a relatively small scale, that would cost hundreds of thousands, or even millions.

>>5389
I was looking purely at the numbers. I don't have an encyclopaedic knowledge of African politics and population, your input is fair, was just a first thought.

>>5394
My company has involvement with a company which is developing cheaper methods of pipelining. The owner is a philanthropist who wants to help poorer countries get running water. If this got off the ground in a serious way (although I must admit I'm sceptical on a chan based project) something could be negotiated there.

>>5396
Why not remote Montana or Wyoming? There's cheap as fuck land there and no one bothers you out there speaking from experience. I've lived in rural Montana.

>>5388
considering the blind devotion to it being in Africa despite the youth league demanding land back from whites already there.
it being in Africa and a desolate wasteland part of it to boot.
the part we are going to being close to SA aka ultra angry nigger central.

I'm seriously wondering if this is a shill set-up.

Argentina is mostly white and European, we've never talked about it once.

I'd personally would love to visit Hitler's grave if the exiles don't mind showing an outsider it's location.
bring a couple edelweiss from Germany.

>>5399
while in the US and under the NSA's glaring stare, the bundy ranch has show the govt will back down rather then martyr people.

but… i know how to get heavy armament in the US.

then again, the US is about to die…

>>5403
except they had an army and the locals had sticks.

>>5403
>Poor economic prospects

Irrelevant. The entire world has poor economic aspects. Besides, we're aiming for self-sufficiency.

>social stratification and immobility

Agreed, but again, that's kind of irrelevant if we're in the middle of nowhere and self-sufficient. We can also make goods while we're out there.

>censorship

Not any that would affect us.

>a culture that no longer suits us

We'll have our own culture while we're alone. And the USA is (obviously) not homogeneous. Many parts and people agree with us and our views.

>NSA's glaring stare

Really, I agree this sucks, but it won't really affect us. There's all sorts of things you can do to protect yourself from this, and even if we couldn't (and I do value privacy extremely), it still wouldn't affect us, and becoming self-sufficient and forming a new sort of state would be worth the cost.

>then again, the US is about to die…

If the USA dies the economies outside of the west will die too and out there you'll have millions of angry and violent niggers.

>>5409
>Collapsing countries are not kind environments.

See above

>>5417
>Africa is booming, India and China are still growing, export is growing in South America, etc.

Africa, China, and India, as well as South America are only booming because the WEST buys from them. When OUR prospects go down so do theirs. China is a bubble by the way.

>Western governments have shown numerous time that sticking to your own (as native population) or creating an alternative is not welcome (especially in Europe).

It's not even in public discussion really. I'll give you that it's not welcome in Europe, but no one says otherwise in the USA. Literally if we want to move somewhere in the JewSA that's uninhabited we will face no opposition. I don't see why you're claiming this.

>people can suffer permanent life-long exclusion from the political and even economic process due to something they might have said in public

I don't think any of us plan on running for president or senator etc while we're doing this. And besides, this doesn't exclude people from local office.

>We want to get away from the political correctness ruse that has really only been created to exclude people from positions

We will be away from it if we live on our own.

>We also want to get away from the debt slavery forced upon us.

See above.

>We also want to get away from the debt slavery forced upon us.

See above.

>Africa is already orienting it self towards supplying the (Far) Eastern markets. Same with South America. Africa won't stop growing nor will India or China.

Africa depends on two things: Western and Chinese investment. China depends on two things: African returns, and Western economies.

If the west falls so does China and Africa.

>The world will survive, but chances are the same can not be said about the US.

Of course the USA won't survive. That's why we strive for self sufficiency and relative isolation.

>>5381
That border looks so strong. How will they ever cross that river.