>>1439NatSoc exists only in the cracks of liberal society. That is it. Historicaly this has always been the case. It's also always lost.
It exists only because liberal society doesn't believe in the mass slaughter of opponents, and the instant it does, NatSoc would go.
It steals revolutionary language, and purports to speak for the underclass, while at the same time talks about domination, petty revenge, and suppressing its oponents.
It has no ground support, and is generally the puppet of security agencies scared of the reds, or even liberals who get too extreme for their leadership.
I wouldn't be supprised if half of you, to include you /pol/iticians were in some fashion working for the US government. It wouldn't be the first time, and won't be the last.