/natsoc/ - National Socialism

>>2217

The Klan is a force of good.

There's really plenty of overlap between them and NS. The leftists are right when they equate the two.

>>2219
uhh no. They committed a number of attrocities and I'm not talking about fuckers who were askingforit. They were out of control during Memphis riots. Also, Albert Pike.

>>2223

>atrocity

What do you mean?

>>2223
>Memphis Riots of 1866
>1866

Oh please, it was an absolutely dangerous and chaotic time in the South after the civil war and the niggers were let loose. The Klan protected Southern Whites during this period. Yes, there was violence on both sides. But don't buy into the Judeo-Hollywood lies about the Klan. The Klan isn't violent and there are many "Klans". A lot of violent acts were unjustly attributed to the Klan during the "civil rights era". But you could probably find more violence in many NatSoc groups than you would in the Klan

>>2227
> The Klan isn't violent and there are many "Klans".
>Klan isnt violent.
>Yes, there was violence on both sides.
>Violence on both sides.
>But you could probably find more violence in many NatSoc groups than you would in the Klan

Do us a favor, and phrase your sentences better, kike. Theres nothing we need more than Jews like you, and these sluts letting niggers and faggots into their ranks.

http://thesource.com/2014/11/10/the-klu-klux-klan-is-expanding-to-accept-african-americans-jews-homosexuals/

http://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/news/local/2014/11/02/abarr-proposes-inclusive-kkk-chapter-mt/18397651/

>>2228
> Theres nothing we need more than Jews like you
>Telling me to phrase my sentences better
You're absolutely ridiculous. People who accuse and slander other NS users contribute absolutely nothing to the cause. You call me a kike but your divisive words speak for themselves, I'm willing to bet you're either a keyboard warrior or an infiltrator. There's nothing an anti wants more than to divide Whites.

Okay, the South during the Civil war was NOT a vehicle for racial survival.

It was based on slavery, not the survival of the White Race. There was no way ordinary working class White people could compete against a massive cheap labor force. The South existing and continuing slavery would have caused Whites to decline and fade away. Whites would move North to find work. This would then leave the South as third world country full of blacks and ruled over by a class of degenerate Whites.

>>2233
Is English your first language? Because it isn't mine, okay? I was trying to say that there was violence on both sides after the civil war, that is, the first version of the Klan was there to protect Whites in a time of racial violence. Then I said the Klan isn't violent. I was talking about the MODERN Klan. The modern Klan is not a violent organization. How is it a contradiction to say that there is more violence in many NatSoc groups than in the Klan? There is no contradiction there. As I said too though, there are many Klans. There is no one "Klan" so while on a whole, the KKK is not violent, there are stupid start up Klans that are illegitimate and pretend to the actual KKK, some of these are stupid skinheads and they are violent

>>2240
>There is no contradiction there.
Not the way you rephrased everything now. Before you looked like a racist hate mongerer.

Why would American nationalists support rebel scum?