"#BlackLivesMatter Leader Says Looting Is A Form Of Protest"
>#BlackLivesMatter leader, Deray McKesson, is lecturing a course at Yale University where he claims that looting is a form of protest.
>The course "Transformational Leadership in the #BlackLivesMatter Movement” is nothing more than Marxist infused ideological training camp for Marxist agitators. Would Yale allow such a course for White Nationalist students? No, they wouldn't even allow a White Student Union. The hypocrisy and agenda is glaringly obvious.
>McKesson justifies his bizarre claim by comparing Ferguson looting to the infamous 'Boston Tea Party' where resistance groups boarded an East India Company vessel and threw its cargo of tea into the Boston Harbour. The act was in defiance of the 'Tea Act' of 1773 in which Great Britain asserted a tax over the American colony culminating in the American Revolution. The entire affair was over the question of whether British Parliament had any right to assert itself within the American colony.
>There is no comparison to be made here. The issue revolved around 'No Taxation Without Representation' where American colonies had little to no say in British Parliament despite the Empire asserting Tax laws. Today, Black Americans are represented and are not unfairly taxed, in actual fact, of all US citizens, it is White Americans who are unfairly taxed. More taxation is spent on black citizens than white citizens per capita despite white citizens paying an overwhelming majority of the tax.
>In regard to police actions, most incidents regarding the overuse of force are vindicated. While the apparatus of the Police State is detrimental to all citizens, it remains a direct reaction to black violence.
>If all of this were untrue and Brown really #dindunuffin, the comparison is still ridiculous when you compare the businesses who had their property destroyed. The East India Trading Company was a large corporation subsidized by the British Empire. The Tea Act was brought about to help the trouble finances of the company. The businesses looted in Ferguson and other areas were not vast naval trading empires, they were small business owners trying to make ends meet. If the looters dressed anonymously and destroyed the property of the Monstano corporation in defiance of the TPP act, then the comparison would be justified.
>McKesson's statement is an oxymoron. While he claims Black Americans are unfairly mistreated under constitutional law, he then attacks the foundations of constitutional law. The fact this man is given credence in Yale and is an invited guest by Hilary Clinton is a sad tale of the times. His movement is using the laws and freedoms given by the Constitution to inevitably tear it apart, all the while progressives glee and cheer him on. The Communists and their secret semetic ilk have done wonders over the years in using the liberties of the land to undermine peoples liberties and will eventually seek to completely erase them. This path is now being justified by the the myths and legends that created those liberties in the first place.
>This is part of an ongoing media wide attempt to justify the violence of black movement's. Movement's which have been founded, funded, fermented and propped up by Marxist agitators. KcKesson apparently even cites these articles in his lectures:
http://op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/12/17/when-are-violent-protests-justified/
http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/in-defense-of-looting/
http://time.com/3605606/ferguson-in-defense-of-rioting/
>This lecture is a training camp which will be used to radicalize and invoke ideological discipline into young peoples brought up on an educational diet of Marxist theory. These students will effectively be communist soldiers and leaders for future street battles.
The #CultureWar is heating up
Read the full article at:
https://www.facebook.com/775321069174023/photos/a.776049979101132.1073741828.775321069174023/976764815696313/
Alt Link: https://archive.is/v4Nj9