>>1038>Also, didn't Hitler kind of not care about economic systems, and changed it depending on what benefited Germany the most at that time?Nope, you're wrong, if you read Mein Kampf, Hitler says that his big moment where he acquired a Weltanschauung (world view) that was different from Marxism was when he attended one of Gottfried Feder's lectures where Feder explains his economic theory of "national socialism". You can read the book that is the written version of these lectures here:
https://7chan.org/lit/src/Feder-InterestSlavery-trans_Hadding_Scott.pdfThe whole point of "National Socialism" is that is is an economic system that is different from both Capitalism and Communism and the economic system is based on "the abolition of debt interest slavery and the elimination of incomes that are earned without work". The difference between Strasserism and Hitlerism is that Strasserism takes the ideas in Feder's 1919 book literally and tries to implement them aggressively whereas Hitlerism takes a more laid back and casual approach to the elimination of debt interest slavery because Hitlerism has this idea of a "Führerprinzip" where the Führer is allowed to bend the rules if he wants to whereas Strasserism takes the economic theories more seriously and tries to implement them more aggressively.