/neupol/ - New Politically Incorrect

Of course it's shit right now, as most new boards are. It's up to the userbase to make it gud ultimately. At least there won't be any censorship.

Maybe if imkampfy goes on a hotpocketing spree again more /pol/acks will come over.

>>33

I don't see why you'd make a whole new board just so people can shitpost "check my dubs" or whatever they want. Regular /pol/ is fine, the community there are what ruins it.

A new board for such a subtle difference ultimately means nothing, there should be a board dedicated to actually going out and making a /pol/ approved difference in the world.

>>34

>just so people can shitpost "check my dubs" or whatever

It's not just for shitposting; the point is that you can post anything you'd like. Sure this results in a lot of spam and low-quality threads, but who cares. If you want a board to be good, you have to make good threads and post in them (self moderation!)

>the community there are what ruins it.

Precisely. A lot of /pol/'s current users are butthurt fags who take themselves too seriously, and as a result the board has stagnated and become shit. The hotpocketry is just a result of that. And that is why we need a new /pol/ board, a real alternative where a new board culture can flourish.

>A new board for such a subtle difference ultimately means nothing

That depends entirely on the userbase. /pol/ doesn't have to stay on /pol/; it may as well exist here instead. As far as I've seen, quite some people are dissatisfied with the current state of /pol/. And even /int/, a board which is way smaller, split in two due to different opinions on how moderation should be handled, so I don't see why it shouldn't work with /pol/ as well.

>there should be a board dedicated to actually going out and making a /pol/ approved difference in the world.

Again, this depends on the userbase. A board is just a tool which can be used to accomplish these results; it has no value in and of itself. It all depends on the posters.

>>38

I'm not a pedo, but nazi lolis are great because they trigger SJWs in two ways at once.

>>35

I haven't even seen any hotpocketry. If you look at Brit/pol/ it's just 24/7 shitposting, the mods lack of intervention there has completely ruined that community. I've no idea how people, including Hotwheels have such a different impression of the moderation on /pol/.

Maybe I didn't get the full picture because I rarely posted outside of Brit/pol/, but from what I've seen this is all unnecessary.

>>49

Pic related.

The fact they're bumplocking even fatshaming threads now did it for me.

>anything that isn't "high quality" series discussion doesn't belong on /pol/!!!1

If this isn't hotpocketry, I don't know what is. And then there's the userbase, a large part of which has turned the shill meme into an actual paranoia, and demanding for suspected "shills" to be b&. It's just pretty gay all in all imo. In the end the users decide what kind of board they want, of course.