[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / bimbo / choroy / dempart / doomer / lovelive / vril / wmafsex ]

/newsplus/ - News +

Read the News!
Winner of the 81rd Attention-Hungry Games
/y2k/ - 2000s Nostalgia

Entries for the 2019 Summer Infinity Cup are now open!
May 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

The heartbeat of 8chan is strong

File: f069755a74d75bf⋯.png (623.4 KB, 771x408, 257:136, swimmer.png)


Transgender swimmers will be granted full access to Hampstead Heath’s ladies’ pond following a local authority ruling which has sparked protest from feminists and Orthodox Jewish women.

People who identify as transgender now have the right to bathe in the women's-only pond in London which is used by celebrities including the model, Kate Moss and actresses Emma Thompson and Helena Bonham-Carter.




Can't wait until some based Brit with humongous hairy testicles throws on a wig and goes for a skinny dip while those uppity celebs are trying to enjoy a swim.



I'd rather just take a giant streaming expired milk and out of date eggs diarrhoea shit into it with all of those fucking cunts looking.

Never heard of this thing before, why is there a women only swimming pond in the first place.

They shut down all the men only clubs a few decades ago, cunts.


File: 44cf2d7940b51df⋯.jpeg (126.68 KB, 600x528, 25:22, image.jpeg)


At least two people in that pic are men (whom identify as men).


If you put newts in it and let them breed there then the pond will be reclassed as not for humans, and as a nature reserve (newts are protected).



>when people realize that gender roles are good and segregation isn't always discrimination.



They'd realise it when I take a liquid shit in the pool.



Don't use "whom" if you don't know what it means.



On the contrary young knave it is ye sir whom does not know what whom means.



There's a men's pond a minute away



Learn English yank




>At least two people in that pic are men (whom identify as men).

I guess using whom there sounds a little awkward. It would sound smoother if it said "At least two people in that pic are men (all of whom identify as men)"


File: 1e8099c05875313⋯.jpg (15.43 KB, 255x251, 255:251, 00bf56f452adeb05d0713fc974….jpg)

>Europeans bathe in dirty lake ponds in public with strangers



Those ponds are definitely preferable to public city pools, which are absolutely disgusting.


Ya remember that bathroom panic? The people who thought trans people might creep on others had reasons to think people might creep on others, if you know what I’m saying. Trans people are fine. It’s “conservatives” you have to watch out for.



>Trans people are fine. It’s “conservatives” you have to watch out for.

You mean "white men"



Do these kikes really have nothing better to do? Go back to cutting up and sucking newborn baby penises you paedophiles.

It's a shame Hitler didn't finish the job.



Kind of? “Antisemites” are a more specific target that still aims correctly. People who imagine dipshit things and then become terrified or pissed about them have to have some reason to believe a real person would really do a specific horrible thing. Often that’s because they’d do it themselves if they had the power.



>Put on a swimsuit

>Go the women's pond and claim you're a woman on the inside

>Piss everyone off with merely your presence

>I dunno, take candid pictures or something while you're at it



>sue them for discrimination and transphobia if they try to make you leave and make bank




Men should troll the women’s pond as transwomen to twitter their salty tears.



What about trans-jews?



You're correct, anyone with a working understanding of English grammar knows that he should have used "whom'st'd've" in that post.



It's a bitch when (((schemes))) backfire, isn't it?



>I'd rather just take a giant streaming expired milk

What are you even trying to say?


File: 7a48564b667a4bd⋯.webm (697.17 KB, 320x240, 4:3, lol.webm)

First the muslims protest against agenda globohomo 21, now feminazis literally being triggered by trannies.




men is already a plural reference, and the referenced is already specified as a pair, therefore not only is the use of "all" redundant, it is rather awkward indeed. original sentence is still the best one.

>At least two people in that pic are men (whom identify as men).

This is still the best. If you want to fuck around though

>>At least two people in that pic are men (both of whom identify as men).

Is also acceptable. But maybe you're just deliberately furthering bastardizing the language intentionally. But mabes just dummo.



Im English, we wrote in English rather than American English hence we say these things a lot:

- whom

- hence

- such as

- colour

- rumor

Continue to bastardise our language



Meant rumour not rumor


based trannies and based jews


Xvideos embed. Click thumbnail to play.

TRANNIES GONE WILD at Hampstead Heath's Ladyboy Pond



>Meant rumour not rumor

britfag btfo


File: 048adb2817e2466⋯.jpeg (63.5 KB, 533x850, 533:850, 194316-ruempf-mensch-mann….jpeg)


EU in a nut shell if there ever was one.


Stop Racist Nazi Apartheid Israel


https://boicotisrael.net/ (ES)










how about if all the trannies and the jews were killed.

problem solved.






It would take you 5-10 minutes to look up what the word means, instead of just flinging guesses based on what you overheard at the bus stop on your way to retard-therapy.

"whom" was utterly incorrect in >>237497, it can't be used in that context, it is wrong.

Saying "whom" when it 'feels right' doesn't make you sound clever, apart from to people with less knowledge than even you.

Just look it up, find out how to use it, forget how to use it then never use it again in your life.

Or look it up and try to remember how it works, because then you can at least be smug and accurate, instead of just a noisy useless cunt blowing hot air all over the place with no basis of understanding whatsoever on the subject.



Extra bonus information: to understand how and when to use 'whom' you will have to first understand how sentences work, which will require some background learning and understanding. It really isn't for everyone, which is why most people can't use 'whom' properly. It is barely useful anyway, due to having been almost eliminated from modern english within the realms of the common tongue, and is reserved either for academia or pomposity, guess which one was the cause for it popping up in this thread.


File: a16afb5705430e3⋯.jpg (501.21 KB, 1512x2016, 3:4, a16afb5705430e351953453173….jpg)

Trans are not fags!


I am a man who identifies as a police officer.

Where are my rights



I can't have a unretarded baby with that.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abdl / bimbo / choroy / dempart / doomer / lovelive / vril / wmafsex ]