[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / beast / egy / htg / newbrit / polk / v9k / wai ]

/newsplus/ - News +

Read the News!

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


THE RULES
Follow Newsplus on Twitter

File: 8435dfd63819838⋯.jpg (1.82 MB, 2400x3000, 4:5, Joe Rogan.jpg)

 No.70182

http://www.thegoldwater.com/news/1869-Twitter-Shadow-Ban-List-Leaked-Includes-Joe-Rogan

There were rumors in February saying that Twitter had started shadowbanning users. These rumors have been confirmed by a source inside the company.

The source said that Twitter maintains a ‘whitelist’ of favoured Twitter accounts and a ‘blacklist’ of unfavoured accounts.

The accounts on the whitelist are prioritized in search results. This happens even if they’re not the most popular among users.

The accounts on the blacklist have their posts hidden from both search results and other users’ timelines.

Twitter has been deliberately whitelisting and blacklisting users.

 No.70190

>>70182

>rumours

>implying we didn't know.


 No.70202

File: 1625b857dec0b95⋯.png (259.16 KB, 886x830, 443:415, dianalove.png)

It's been known for awhile that Twitter shadowbans "unfavorable" people. I myself have had several accounts be affected.

I tell you what though, no amount of censorship, no amount of shadowbanning, no amount of whitelisting, blacklisting, or fucking turquoiselisting can ever stop my love for Diana.

MAHAL KITA


 No.70204

>>70202

I tell you what though, no amount of censorship, no amount of shadowbanning, no amount of whitelisting, blacklisting, or fucking turquoiselisting can ever stop normalfags being fucking retards and continuing to use the site.


 No.70209

>>70182

Blacklisting/whitelisting. Call them out for using archaic racial dichotomies in their censorship program. Any customer service outlet that let's complaints and screaming dictate their policy is doomed to fail or alienate their best.


 No.70215

>>70202

Could someone please shed more light on these so called Goldwater girls? They have the potential to become a runaway sensation.


 No.70216

>>70182

The fuck has he been up too? Did they relaunch his show or something?


 No.70222

>>70216

He has had some "controversial" guests on, and he speaks out against SJWs and political correctness - someone probably put some pressure on Twitter and they caved, as usual.


 No.70236

Twitter isn't censoring anyone. They don't have the power to do so. Joe is free to join any other social media sites.


 No.70240

>>70202

It's weird how many people are in denial that shadowbanning is happening.


 No.70243

>>70215

>filthy Pinoy ladyboys

>"women"

Sure thing, Jim.


 No.70245

>>70236

b-but muh hundreds of thousands of followers! i can't live without the attention!

These faggots will NEVER let social media go. They thrive on the attention-whoring - or, as (((Thernovich))) would call it, "promoting your personal brand". It's easy to cry foul and complain about the shit that Twitter is, than put their minds to work and find/promote/create an alternative to it. At least when (((Milo))) did it, we could dismiss it because he's a fucking kike faggot.


 No.70246

>>70236

>Twitter isn't censoring anyone

…besides the accounts they shadowban, disable, delete, etc

Other than that, no one at all


 No.70247

>>70236

>Twitter isn't censoring anyone because he can go someplace where he isn't censored

Are you fucking stupid? That's plainly a non-sequitur, and before you say "but I just meant X;" no, you didn't, and if you did you should learn to express that with proper words you illiterate fuck.


 No.70253

>>70246

What they do IS censorship, but they are in their right to do so (under the principle that First Amendment protection is only against State censorship; "my house, my rules" apply to private individuals and companies).

Since they don't fit themselves as a "free-speech platform", I don't find a problem with them doing censorship, but I'll also not use nor recommend their shitty little website to anyone else.


 No.70254

>>70253

>Sucking this much cock while you type

Anon, we're all aware of that, and viciously mocking you is about the most effort you deserve for your morally bankrupt excuse.


 No.70256

>>70247

Twitter is a shit platform, and I'd rather see it dead, for all the harm it caused to online discourse. Censorship and "safe-spacing" is a sure away to drive people away it, so I'm actually OK with they engaging in this; never interrupt myour enemy when he's making a mistake.


 No.70257

>>70256

Your back must be quite tired after moving all those goalposts anon.


 No.70264

>>70236

>it's not censoring anyone, i swear

>you're free to join other social media sites

lol wot?


 No.70265

>>70254

>morally bankrupt excuse

You seem to misaprehend what I'm saying, faggot. Lgeally, they can be as draconian and ban-happy as they want, and you can't do shit about it (well, I suppose you can do a Cernovich and call for the government to regulate Twitter, because it's an "essential service"). If they do so, they will fail miserably and die, and I'm not exactly in the mood to save Twitter from themselves. The faster they burn, the better.

By all means, the fact that they are censoring stuff and banning/shadowbanning "undesirables" it should be broadcast to their userbases, so everyone is aware of it. Let's see how many people will leave because of it.

>>70257

I'm not the anon who said that they weren't censoring people.


 No.70268

>>70202

this picture makes me want to fap to keeani lei porn every time


 No.70288

File: 15801f2d20cfc92⋯.mp4 (1.49 MB, 480x270, 16:9, Garrett on Instagram joero….mp4)


 No.70336

>>70246

Posting on Twitter isn't a right. It's their website to with as they please. It's like bar throwing out a guest for being to disruptive.

>>70247

Am I wrong? Can they not start their own website? Or join another website?

>>70256

It needs competition.


 No.70345

>>70215

>runaway sensation

As in what they'll do from Jim's basement if he ever unchains them? Why do you think you can never see their feet?


 No.70363

Sounds like the kosher Nazis over at pol.


 No.70375

File: 701fb2e9c3f5d1c⋯.jpg (488.39 KB, 1400x988, 350:247, shadbase.wallstreet-statue.jpg)

There are even low-profile accounts getting shadowbanned.


 No.70413

>>70375

Holy fucking shit- I've never appreciated Shadman's art but the dude is a god.


 No.70510

File: 755a28cb7eeb2af⋯.jpg (54.56 KB, 526x526, 1:1, ijhgu0.jpg)


 No.70874

>>70253

>my house my rules

Except they aren't rules.


 No.70994

No one cares about this loser and no one cares about twitter.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / beast / egy / htg / newbrit / polk / v9k / wai ]