>>666
>some vol acts like a fucking faggot when anonymous
>avoids getting banned because other vols don't want drama and know that ID:whatever is him
>other posters get banned for doing the same shit
A number of vols for various boards are friends with one another, if they know that some anon is a BV/the BO they'll be less likely to ban him for pulling shit. On top of that most people modify their behavior depending on whether or not they capcode
If I had vols they'd be able to associate various anon posts back to me unless I reset my IP every time I capcoded, which would color their opinion on how to handle shit in a way that isn't intended. If I ripped into someone as an anon (but didn't ban them as they didn't break any rules) another BV might associate that anon post shitting all over someone back to my capcode and view it as license to ban him.
More generally they would pick up bits of information that I'd never tell them directly because I forgot that my anonymous posts weren't so anonymous to them. Pretty sure I've seen posts by Josh around the site which mention details he'd wouldn't mention in an official capacity (unless someone else has a boner for posting pictures by that one artist), which is the same type of shit.
Really, the best way to do this is to have any posts which use the BV/BO capcode use a separate board-wide ID to any posts from the same IP which don't. None of the vols would know who the anon posters are then, no information will accidentally leak, and they won't show any favoritism in their moderation.
>>656
People can already use a username if they want to. Making it mandatory just removes the choice, and if you were to use anything other than (boardname)BO/BV1/etc which a lot of people would if forced to you'd get into obnoxious tripfag special snowflake territory pretty fucking fast.