[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/next/ - Infinity Next

Yes, we're getting it in Infinity Next.

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
Verification *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Do you speak multiple languages?
Development Website | How to Donate with Bitcoin without Technical Experience | Alternative Software

File: 1440116977146.png (52.73 KB, 338x244, 169:122, 1421628899278.png)

2fb952 No.643

Currently, volunteers are not anonymous to each other. They can follow each other's UIDs. Could there be a feature to hide this? Maybe signing into your board controls could give you a separate UID from your normal anon posts? The goal is to make it so only the board owner can tell who is who.

8c0c97 No.656

why would you want this? As it stands, Infinity Next is designed to decrease ambiguity. If you capcode a post on Next, you are forced to use your name. I feel this increases accountability and fuckups are easily traced to those who committed them.


c42dbb No.661

>>660

If you're already using your capcode, what's the point of not also including your mod name?

Are you pretending to be someone else or something? Why the ambiguity?


2fb952 No.664

>>656

If you use your capcode in one post, should that also reveal all of your posts, including the ones you made as anon?

If I post in one thread as anon, but use my capcode in another thread, the other volunteers now know who I was in that first thread as anon. I was wondering if that could be changed. If volunteers are aware of each other at all times, it can create favoritism. Some board owners would prefer more anonymity between their staff.


e200de No.666

>>664

Why? Are you ashamed of your posts as anon or something?

>If volunteers are aware of each other at all times, it can create favoritism

I don't see how.


574904 No.670

File: 1440226492283.webm (6.94 MB, 852x480, 71:40, 1438069429819.webm)

>>666

>some vol acts like a fucking faggot when anonymous

>avoids getting banned because other vols don't want drama and know that ID:whatever is him

>other posters get banned for doing the same shit

A number of vols for various boards are friends with one another, if they know that some anon is a BV/the BO they'll be less likely to ban him for pulling shit. On top of that most people modify their behavior depending on whether or not they capcode

If I had vols they'd be able to associate various anon posts back to me unless I reset my IP every time I capcoded, which would color their opinion on how to handle shit in a way that isn't intended. If I ripped into someone as an anon (but didn't ban them as they didn't break any rules) another BV might associate that anon post shitting all over someone back to my capcode and view it as license to ban him.

More generally they would pick up bits of information that I'd never tell them directly because I forgot that my anonymous posts weren't so anonymous to them. Pretty sure I've seen posts by Josh around the site which mention details he'd wouldn't mention in an official capacity (unless someone else has a boner for posting pictures by that one artist), which is the same type of shit.

Really, the best way to do this is to have any posts which use the BV/BO capcode use a separate board-wide ID to any posts from the same IP which don't. None of the vols would know who the anon posters are then, no information will accidentally leak, and they won't show any favoritism in their moderation.

>>656

People can already use a username if they want to. Making it mandatory just removes the choice, and if you were to use anything other than (boardname)BO/BV1/etc which a lot of people would if forced to you'd get into obnoxious tripfag special snowflake territory pretty fucking fast.


2fb952 No.671

File: 1440231649915.png (358.07 KB, 640x640, 1:1, 1423457609204.png)

>>670

Thank you. You explained it better than I could.

>the best way to do this is to have any posts which use the BV/BO capcode use a separate board-wide ID to any posts from the same IP which don't.

Yes. The idea is to have more anonymity, and all the good and bad that comes with it.


8754ae No.672

>>670

Why would a vol ever do something bannable, like shitposting?

If you want to post with capcode, you need to be be honest and take responsibility for all your previous anon replies.

>A number of vols for various boards are friends with one another

That sounds like some kind of circlejerking IRC room tbh


8754ae No.673

>>670

Also, how the fuck is removing the name field from the capcode would solve the problem? Other vols would still see your post history, but with no name on your post, everyone would need to guess who exactly posted that. Like >>661 said, why the ambiguity?


574904 No.677

File: 1440298900824.webm (8 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Shag_-_Know_the_Feelin.webm)

>>673

By not having to use a name I mean not having to use whatever name you log in with instead of just using whatever you want when you post. So if your account name was BigGuy when you capcode you can use Anonymous ## Board Owner or something else instead of being forced into using BigGuy ## Board Owner.

>>672

>A number of vols for various boards are friends with one another

>That sounds like some kind of circlejerking IRC room tbh

In some cases yeah, in other cases no. If you volunteer and moderate a fast board you're going to have to talk to the other vols frequently regardless of what you do - asking them whether X or Y should be deleted/banned, trying to figure out how they moderate so you don't end up with inconsistent moderation that pisses off your userbase, dealing with various shitstorms, etc.

You're going to develop an opinion on them one way or another even without an IRC-style secret circlejerk, and a number of boards do have a circlejerk going on behind the scenes anyway. And as things currently are some BVs/BOs would do something bannable because they know they're not going to get banned for it by other vols. That's why changing ID for capcoded vs noncapcoded posts from a given IP is good, it makes it harder for other vols to realize some post is by another BV/BO so they'll be less likely to show favoritism towards it.

>If you want to post with capcode, you need to be be honest and take responsibility for all your previous anon replies.

That runs counter to anonymity. The posts are tied to an identity (some BO/BV) indirectly which restricts freedom of speech as that person will self-censor to stop other BVs from learning about shit they don't want them to know. It might not be your real identity that it's attached to, but it's the same sort of shit as traditional forums (where people craft some online identity they want to put forward to other forum users rather than saying whatever the fuck they want as anon).


4430f7 No.679

>>677

Why wouldn't you trust your fellow volunteers with your own post history?

If you're a volunteer and you do anything bannable as anon, you're a shit volunteer.

You're overthinking this so much it's ridiculous.

This function only exists to prevent any confusion about who exactly posted with the capcode. Why wouldn't you want to know which volunteer posted what?

>That runs counter to anonymity

Yes, every IP on every board has post history, but only vols can see it.

All I'm hearing from your posts is that you're afraid of other volunteers seeing your shitposting history.


2fb952 No.687

>>679

But what if a BO wants their vols to be anonymous to each other?




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]