/next/ - Infinity Next

Yes! Let's also record IP addresses and location data and keep it forever, and then ask google to provide an algorithm to connect the posts together to figure out what people want! This way we can improve the site for everyone! Also remove the ability to ban people or delete anything, because everyone loves being dragged to jail for having child pornography all over the page all the time! Also let's make /intl/ a global board! Also saying bad things about shitposting and spam should be a permanently bannable offense!

>>89

You've misinterpreted my post to such a degree it's amazing.

>>89

4chan already has this by the way and has had it for years.

It's archive.moe and ghost posting.

This is probably the least terrible implementation of board forking I've ever heard. It'd be easy to do, too.

Posts could still be deleted permanently by higher ups.

Also,

>>89

His idea isn't "lets never delete posts", his idea is to let people see what replies have been deleted in active threads. If a thread is pruned, it's still gone, but if a thread is deleted, it's accessible.

>>90

>>94

I may have read that while braindead and pissed off at 1 am or something.

I think this idea is horrible. At least for the unfiltered version since it will become unreadable. If you implement it, consider removing all links from. Spambotters could abuse it for spamming their garbage and make it stay.

>>105

>I think this idea is horrible. At least for the unfiltered version since it will become unreadable.

see

https://archive.moe/v/search/type/op/page/1/

it works fine.

all this is, is something 4chan had for years but now built in.

>>107

I see what you mean. The deleted post is drawn out of the archive if it gets replies. The best implementation IMHO would making it a functionality of the inline Archive that is planed anyway.

Its not the intl autist that worry me here. Its spambotters and shills that want to abuse the system for making their message stay.

Another problem is heap (i.e. Hard disk) memory. I leave that problem to Null however.

>>107

>>108

another cool unrelated thing would be a "view just OPs" like that for a normal option.

>>105

You wouldn't use the "unfiltered" much, but if you suspect things have been censored, it could be a nice feature. You MAY see the "unclean" version.

>>88

The idea is interesting but it shouldn't be forced upon BOs. A better implementation would to give board owners the option to implement the system for their board.

>>88

I like this idea.

Somehow it reminds me of masterchan's idea of marking posts as off-topic and letting them stay on board even if they don't belong. Which means, if this gets implemented, masterchan won't even have the excuse of having this superior free speech feature having implemented while we don't.

>>858

Make it optional though. Like board logs. If board mods don't want to make their moderation transparent, so be it. It is what it is :^)

How about you just go to Masterchan instead?

>>905

4chan-x with archive moe does.

If a Hotpocket deletes a thread it should become invisible from the index but still in the archive with people able to ghost post to it.

Having this built in would solve many complaints.

I like this idea.

Also I suggest that there be no such thing called Board Owner. They should instead be called Board Curators. Their purpose should be limited to what content gets higher visibility in their board. This means Board Curators have no ban, thread deletion or autosage powers. The only power they should have is to mark threads(or posts if it is feasible) as off-topic.

If something is deemed illegal, they should have the privilege of marking it illegal and alerting global moderators.

Title Board Owners gives a lot of these people with the hotpocket mentality a false sense of entitlement. They tend to forget that they are on a website that is not owned by them. Title Board Curator cuts these people down to size and shows them their place.

>>1238

>This means Board Curators have no ban, thread deletion or autosage powers. The only power they should have is to mark threads(or posts if it is feasible) as off-topic.

I think this is too far.

I just want what 4chan-X with archive moe already has.

>>1239

Then, how about this system. When a board is set up, the founder of the board has the option to decide if the board will be a Curated board or a Traditional board with moderators and bans, deletions etc.

If the founder sets it up as a Curated board, then that becomes set in stone and cannot be changed. This way users have a choice to patronize the type of board they want. They will not end up patronizing and building up a Curated board only to see its founder turn power hungry and turn it back into a Traditional board at some point in the future.

Let 8chan be a mixture of masterchan type board as well as boards as they are now. Give users at least a a chance to patronize and build up board where they are sure hotpockets will never have any power

Or how about you leave the hot pocketing board and make one that's not run by a cuck? You know, do things the way they were meant to be run. You shouldn't need Josh and HW to hold your hand for you to post how you want.

>>1241

Make a board how you say boards should be run and shill it. If it sinks, your idea sucks. If it swims, then your idea was a good one. How about that?

Oh look. Here's the problem.

People like boards with moderation more, so boards that ban shitposters are more popular.

But since there aren't many shitposters on 8ch(A vocal minority, if you will), they need to take control over the current major boards by force. This usually means spamming the major boards(As seen with /vvv/) and asking hotwheels/josh to change the code for their own benefit(As seen on fucking >>1238 )

Luckily, it seems Josh and Hotwheels is already aware that this kind of shit would happen, so I don't need to keep writing about those people anymore.

But that doesn't mean I'm done here.

>>1238

>>1241

>Masterchan

There has been an suspicious amount of people mentioning Masterchan around here, hasn't it?

Very arrogant that you would try to use another Imageboard to support your argument. Come back if you know something about the eastern *boards, Futaba and 2channel, faggot.

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　＿ー￣＿￣）’, 　・　∴.'　　， ．. ∧＿∧
　　　　　　　　　　∧　--＿- ― ＝￣　￣`:,　.∴　'　　　　　（Chum）
　　　　　　　　　,　-''￣　　＝　＿＿――＝',　・,‘　ｒ⌒>　 _／ ／
　　　　　　　　／　　＿-―　￣＝＿　　）":"　. 　’ |　ｙ'⌒　　⌒i
　　　　　　　/　　　ノ　￣￣＝＿　　`　））,∴.　　　|　　／　　ノ ｜
　　　　　　/　　, ｲ ）　　　　　　　￣＝　　　　　　　, ー' 　／´ヾ_ﾉ
　　　　 　/　 　_,　＼　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　／　,　　ノ
　　　　 　|　　/ ＼　 `､　　　　　　　　　　　　／　／ ／
　　　　 　ｊ　 /　　ヽ 　|　　　　　　　　　　　／　／　,'
　　　　／　ノ　　　｛ 　|　　　　　　 　　　／　 ／| 　|
　　 ／　／　　　 　|　（_　　　　　　　 　!､＿／ / 　 〉
　　`､＿〉　　　　 　ー‐‐`　　　　　　　　　　　　|_／

>>1260

The problem with that is that it depend on me an individual.

Anons don't trust individuals. Anons trust systems.

If they are sure that a certain board has a certain system such as the one suggested in the Curated Boards idea, they will trust that system not me the individual.

I don't understand what the objection is here. You faggots who love hotpocket boards will get to keep your system'. You lose nothing. Its just that anons who would prefer another type of system will get a choice.

Or is it the fact that you want to subject us to one tinpot hotpocketeer or another

>>1264

I don't get it. Who exactly are you? You are somebody extremely important here?

What is /next/ supposed to be? Some super special secret club of supposedly important people such as yourself to contribute their opinions or are we ordinary anons allowed to express our opinons tooo O lord?

>>1261

what the fuck are you even trying to say nigga

>>1265

it's just a random jungle monkey who is infamous on /v/ for his almost tripfag-tier attention-whoring

>>1265

This fucking guy.

>>1274

>no arguments

>s-sage

thanks for admitting to being a redditor

>>1264

There's too much power in the hands of board owners and there aren't enough good board owners.

There are technical ways around this that shouldn't be too invasive or different from the current system.

>>1286

>There's too much power in the hands of board owners

Everyone in power has too much power on this website.

Take Hotwheels for example. He can reset board UIDs to 0, edit the board CSS and generally fuck with any board in various ways, but he chooses not to do that.

This extends to board owners.

They have a variety of powers such as bypassing the age/sage system with stickies and hiding their moderator actions, but boards that are more transparent about their actions by enabling the board log are the ones that currently rule the top 25.

Which brings me to my 2nd point.

>and there aren't enough good board owners.

It says a lot that you complain about the current top boards instead of making your own board.

>>1287

>boards that are more transparent about their actions by enabling the board log are the ones that currently rule the top 25

>https://8ch.net/log.php?board=a

/a/ begs to differ. Logs are hidden in order to sabotage /int[ls]/, and no one really cares. /a/ today has no /meta/ drama and the board ticks along fine.

By the way, I hope Josh doesn't intend to force that transparency, despite what /ints/ & friends may want you to believe it's not necessarily always a good thing, it has its drawbacks. It should be up to each board to make that call, what's right for one community may not be right for the next.

>>88

The main problem here is as usual there MUST be a way for board vols to actually delete CP, hiding it flatly isn't good enough. It might work for text alone I guess, depending on what copypaste thinks, but then you lose the context of the thread. The real worry is that we'll pick up the problems of Masterchan, which isn't drama any of us should want. Also, some boards don't want to be archived and opt out, if implemented it should be possible for boards to opt out of this as well. It may be that people prefer boards that have an unfiltered mode, but others may get sick of it after a while and disable it, they really should still have the option to go back to the traditional model.

Really, for NEXT more options is better in general, so long as it's still possible to go back to a traditional imageboard model. That way hopefully the NEXT rollout can be completed without site-wide autist-scale chimpouts all over the place.

>>1377

That's one board. Is that all you can do?

https://8ch.net/log.php?board=tech

https://8ch.net/log.php?board=furry

https://8ch.net/log.php?board=co

https://8ch.net/log.php?board=tv

Look.

/a/ is a community that wanted stricter moderation, anyways.

She makes me at least half erect and I don't hear anything else.

>>1435

>mfw she is lost to the ages

Also, your thread is shit. There is something much more worrying here.

>>1435

IIRC, she's already had 2 children and is in her mid to late 30s.

She's doing pretty well, all things considered.

As an official hot pocketeer, I think board owners actually need more power, like having autoban text/names/trips.

There's basically nothing I can do in response to a single dedicated spammer tripfag with a big proxy list and a bigger ego, and it drives the board quality down and mildly annoys the users.

test