>>94All the more reason to dislike British occultists.
>>95That mega has a LOT more content than just what you described and I've been through it before.
>Temple of Set>and all the other Satanic groups>not watered down adulterators of other philosophies>all they do is literally repeat the same shit except they substitute sinister words>spirit for example becomes "black flame" and entities in general are usually just called "demons" and so on with the edgy word replacements (not that there's anything wrong with being edgy)>Joy of Satan is just a combination of worshipping Lord Enki, some generic Satanist dribble, a big portion of the actual magick plagiarized out of the Hermetic writings of Franz Bardon, and of course lots of National Socialist Anti-Semitic Conspiracy which is nice but lol>LaVeyan Satanism is euphoric (atheistic) and psychological, it should be ignored>Some Theistic Satanists are appealing but still pretty pathetic>Satanism as a whole is a joke and primarily consists of butthurt ex-christfags or people who want to piss off christfags>>97Did you even read? They take a mundane psychological approach, are post-modernist, watered-down, etc.
In addition I will say that Israel Regardie fills his writings with too much Christian biased fluff that isn't actually usable when he could cut down his books a lot to get to the essential core knowledge that makes things work – but he's seems to have missed the point in his writings.
RAW's writings were made popular during a really shitty time in history, namely, that period in which that worthless generation we know as the boomers was maturing and taking up its place in history as the generation that fucked over the world for everyone else.
Austin Osman Spare wrote some interesting things on automatic writing, automatic drawing, and sigilization you might want to look into if you're interested in any of that but I wouldn't rely on his writings alone.
Kenneth Grant sucks too, he's a worthless Thelemite… and AOS is mentioned as having had contact with Crowley for awhile (not a good thing to have in your record, anyone associated with Crowley should be put down in the priority list for study, and you will generally be disappointed by actually reading them).
If you want to read them like I did go ahead, it's an arduous task to read over and examine the texts of every occultist.
>>98How about you go fuck yourself mundane? You wouldn't stand a chance against me in a magick battle. "The occult" is not some fucking group I join, my edginess is not validated by the occult, my edginess is just a character trait of the persona I have invoked at present. I'm an edgelord that happens to practise the occult. …and I don't give a shit if I hurt your feelings and stole your loosh again, I am Indigo Pill incarnate.
>inb4 the usual highly predictable whining on your part>>104Post-modernist, needlessly sceptical about everything and yet not sceptical about the important things, psychologist, believes the holohoax happened, etc.