For a thread on /pol/, interested parties from there can take this pdf and this thread can slide awayhttp://8ch.net/pol/res/3572947.html

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1444480617888-0.pdf (605.35 KB, Hitler and WWII for pol.pdf)

File: 1444480617888-1.gif (902.1 KB, 400x328, 50:41, 1431189291488.gif)

Anonymous 10/10/15 (Sat) 12:36:57 2d2579 No.2632

For a thread on /pol/, interested parties from there can take this pdf and this thread can slide away

http://8ch.net/pol/res/3572947.html

Anonymous 10/11/15 (Sun) 02:18:46 73f4aa No.2634

File: 1444529926856.png (38.79 KB, 386x328, 193:164, JesusChristHowAdorable.png)

>>2632

>Hitler and WWII for pol.pdf

>>citing wikipedia over 400 times.

Anonymous 10/12/15 (Mon) 23:28:24 5d1a75 No.2656

>>2634

It's to show people the influence of the jews and communism during that time. People won't even read that stuff if you've got sites like the dailystormer or whatever as your sources…

Anonymous 10/13/15 (Tue) 05:07:42 97bbd2 No.2657

>>2656

>People won't even read that stuff if you've got sites like the dailystormer or whatever as your sources…

Yet they will treat a document that favorably cites holocaustianity.com completely seriously. Even if they did, the fucking web-page is down anyway. Stop treating the authors shortcuts which are obviously the byproduct of intellectual laziness as a selling point. He isn't citing Wikipedia because people will treat the document more seriously (they won't), he is citing it because he couldn't be bothered obtaining and reading primary sources.

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 04:03:27 ea3219 No.3578

>>2657

Author here

I've definitely read the primary sources, in fact I have a recommended reading list at the end of the document

But it's as >>2656 said, sources like Wikipedia are used so much because normies trust it and it gets the information across easily.

Also, plenty of "primary sources" are just as forged and exaggerated as dailystormer. Just because a printed book on WWII says something doesn't mean it's true or widely accepted either.

Look at David Irving etc if you want analysis of firsthand war documentation, I'll never get that detailed

Anonymous 02/29/16 (Mon) 13:39:09 8669d8 No.3583

File: 1456753149886.pdf (1.09 MB, Politics - WWII v1.4.pdf)

Updated version

Thanks to comments on /pol/ for the constructive criticism

Anonymous 03/07/16 (Mon) 23:15:19 58d573 No.3643

File: 1457392519516.pdf (494.39 KB, The Color of Crime - Ameri….pdf)

New /pol/ content

Please sage so that this thread can slide down and not take up space, it's not meant to be permanent