>>446Mr. Anon, can I safely assume that your only central argument was that she is not to be completely trusted with open arms? I mean, like saying: "It's good that she's (sort of?) on our side, but we shouldn't really be licking her boots because of that."
In such a case, I agree. Otherwise, I have a few reservations about what you have said, but I am don't feel strongly enough either way to refute this and if I were the moderator I'd just let it fly.
Seriously, the best kind of mod to have is someone who is uninvolved and just bans obvious shills and desperate trolls.