Planning General

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 4 per post.

File: 1417339358165.webm (4.28 MB, 640x360, 16:9, AsianSoundMagic.webm)

Planning General Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 09:22:38 570b11 No.739

This is the only GG board that doesn't tone police and is smart enough to enable IDs.

Count me in. Now I need to know what is the plan?
We need to organise and get CulMarx on the back foot again.

Planning general I guess.

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 09:25:29 a1edc6 No.740

Holy fuck. When was this board created?!
If more than a few hours ago I think I'm going to kill myself for not knowing about it!

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 09:29:20 570b11 No.741

>>740
I just learnt of it myself from https://8chan.co/pol/res/431737.html

This will make a nice base of operations for /pol/s end of gg if the owner isn't a faggot.

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 09:37:51 417390 No.743

plans?

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 09:42:57 570b11 No.744

>>743
While not related to GG I would like to see attention brought to http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/11261872/James-Watson-selling-Nobel-prize-because-no-one-wants-to-admit-I-exist.html
It is CulMarx that have lead to this happening in science and I suspect many scientists fucking hate it but can't speak up and keep their jobs.

I'm going to look into the stats he quoted and their source to make sure it is scientifically solid. Others doing the same would give a solid base to push further.

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 09:56:37 a1edc6 No.745

>>744
It is a shame indeed, but it is a tricky subject matter since it forces confrontation with ideals at the basis of modern society (all men (i.e. humans) are created equal).
Thus, I don't see any possible way scientists can approach the subject without being destroyed by the very societies that feel threatened by such questions.

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 10:05:30 570b11 No.748

>>745
I'm still looking for a solid source.

Overcoming societies ideals that everyone is the same will not be easy but I feel it is worth trying.
Examples of scientific ideas that were resisted at the time includes:
Germs
Evolution
Vaccines

There are many more examples to call on and I suspect that even a small push will cause a few scientists to speak out.

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 11:11:39 570b11 No.750

>>748
I finally found the original interview but you need to pay to see the whole thing, I'll keep looking for a free one tomorrow.

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/culture/books/article73186.ece

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 11:28:42 570b11 No.751

http://www.atlassociety.org/tni/james-d-watson-another-gadfly-swatted
Is an interesting piece about media manipulation and the original article that lead to his career dwindling.

See the "What Watson Said" section as it's very interesting.

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 11:33:46 570b11 No.752

Just posting this link for myself to use tomorrow.
http://journalisted.com/charlotte-huntgrubbe#tab-work

Watson is both her most covered subject and the subject of the longest article she has ever written at over 2x her average length.

Anonymous 11/30/14 (Sun) 22:37:22 5c7d96 No.783

What do you guys think?

http://www.strawpoll.me/3094493

Anonymous 12/01/14 (Mon) 02:13:47 570b11 No.785

>>783
Does the USA have anything like "media watch", a program that verifies news reports / interviews and calls out lies?