/pgg/ - /pol/ GamerGate

>>88
> liberals cannot compete in a free market.
they dont need to. They're welfare/trust fund parasites.
pampered all their lives, bitching at mommy so she keeps providing free milk. Bitching at anyone questioning their lifestyle. Trying to make it universal so they're not forced to face their uselessness.

>>88
>liberals are adapted to reproduce as early as possible, in a resource abundant environment.

But that's not true, the modern progressive has few kids and has them late.

>>88
Amygdala hijacking all the way. You can't argue with these people. Anyone with experience knows that. So we need to master the ways of disabling them.

Anita is such a dumb cunt.

>>234

One way is beating the shit out of them because it's clear their parents did a shitty job with their half-ass definition of discipline.

>>382

Yeah, the further I dig into this as someone who is sympathetic towards attempting to shift the Overton window a bit back to the right, the more I start to realize that political discourse on the right is a pile of cancerous shit.

The communication network is poor.

The education on issues comes from at least three different perspectives - Cultural Conservatism, Nationalism and Liberalism (Libertarianism variety) with little agreement.

Everyone is obsessed about promoting their own cultural identity and not at attempting to fragment the opposing monoculture by developing new cultural identities for allies/members.

The scholarship is abysmal and most of it is fixated on a victim narrative of either trying to define the evils of people opposing them, or in rationalizing defeat (and often incorrectly too, which is a big issue)

Frankly, I'm depressed because as someone who's looking into this seriously for the first time what I'm mostly seeing is a bunch of broken shit and people who have fed their minds garbage.

Can someone please point me in the direction of a community or place on the net that is has a higher level of discourse? Maybe I'm just looking in the wrong place, but at this point I'm seriously considering cashing in and just moving to the outback.

>>464
> Maybe I'm just looking in the wrong place, but at this point I'm seriously considering cashing in and just moving to the outback.

Not a bad idea. I'd do it myself if I had the skillz.

>>382
Political leanings almost certainly have some genetic basis. That said I have no idea what OP is talking about.

>>464
>Can someone please point me in the direction of a community or place on the net that is has a higher level of discourse?
There isn't any really. Counter-Currents.com is probably the closest, and its' proprietor Greg Johnson has expressed a sentiment similar to yours before, but in truth it is a very mixed bag.

What you have to understand is that a left-wing critique of society started about 500 years ago. Any coherent critiques of modernity didn't start until around WWI, when it was basically close to being 'too late'. We are basically at defcon 'it's over' now. There isn't a discourse surrounding counter-revolutionary thought because there really hasn't been time in the same scope that leftist thought has had (actual time to gain ascendency, critique and deconstruct itself and replace itself with a more virulent strain). The left has also been so successful that its' basically absolutely crushed anything that even remotely resembles a coherent threat to its' hegemony. Liberalism is great for t

>>529
>Liberalism is great for…
…times of universal conformity to leftist ideals. We are seeing things like leftists pushing for the removal of due process because they are catching a whiff of general malcontent. The reality is, if there was a place with 'high level discourse' then it would have been shut down violently already. 'High level discourse' is outright against the law in many European countries, and is borderline in many others. It will be so in the US soon, and de facto already is with Party Vanning being "legal" now.