/phile/ - For those who think young.

This thread is interesting

>>>4782

I am not actually thinking that pregnancy at 13 is optimal. I am a pretty ordinary guy in terms of sexual preferences. (Reason I browse these places is because I don't want to be too sexually excited 24/7. 13 year olds are only moderately-strongly exciting to me, >>whereas 16-20 would make my head spin.<<

There is A psychological difference!

*MAP*philia & Ephebophilia should be the biggest focus on defining the subject discussion of "sexual attraction" which in my opinion, are completely different conditions and should be treated as such, and definitely not pigeonholed into one generalised thing!

>>>4782

I am not actually thinking that pregnancy at 13 is optimal. I am a pretty ordinary guy in terms of sexual preferences. (Reason I browse these places is because I don't want to be too sexually excited 24/7. 13 year olds are only moderately-strongly exciting to me, >>whereas 16-20 would make my head spin.<<

There is A psychological difference!

*MAP*philia & Ephebophilia should be the biggest focus on defining the subject discussion of "sexual attraction" which in my opinion, are completely different conditions and should be treated as such, and definitely not pigeonholed into one generalised thing!

>>4782

I am not actually thinking that pregnancy at 13 is optimal. I am a pretty ordinary guy in terms of sexual preferences. (Reason I browse these places is because I don't want to be too sexually excited 24/7. 13 year olds are only moderately-strongly exciting to me, >>whereas 16-20 would make my head spin.)<<

Paedophilia and Ephebopbilia are Psychologically much different!

There needs to be more teaching understanding, and legal definition on the difference between, the sexual attraction of non pubescent children (paedophilia) and the sexual attraction of early-mid pubescent teens (ephebophilia) because they are totally different, and should be understood and especially legally treated as such!

just postin a copypaste

no political movement.

we can't use the train of the lgbt etc movement, it has a finite life expectancy, because it is one of the pillars of the SJW agenda.

being /hebe/ is not a mental illness that seeks validation, it was completely normal (in the actual sense of the word) until proto-feminazis used their newly gained suffrage to ban alcohol and push the AoC up to the fucking sky to keep out competition. even if their hate for men liking young and healthy girls is subconscious, you have all observed it in your life: women hate competition, with an even harder burning passion if the competition outcompetes them. of course you'd want to marry a girl before she gets poisoned by the west instead of some old spittin' never-be-happy hag who will born you deformed children because her eggs are older than the mountains. be it conscious or unconscious, women shudder at the thought of men being able to choose between themselves and /hebe/. thus it was outlawed by tyrrany of majority, women are the majority of the electorate and more than enough men are beta schlubs who'll fall for their stupid "not informed decision" crap.

are you able to explain the inner workings of transistors and all this junk in your pc? if not you shouldn't be allowed to use a pc according to feminazi logic.

adults aren't that informed either, obviously. all those stats about random testing niggers in USA for herpes, spread of AIDS even today, unintended pregnancies aren't very convincing of any informed mind at all.

liking young girls has to return in a sane matter, not by bullying under the veil of political correctnes and progress. just like any other part of the special snowflake movement will fail, hebes will be discredited even harder if they side with the same group of people who fucked them in the first place

pic related - all branches of the SJW will come crashing down sooner or later. we can't afford to be associated with them

at the second pic focus on the equality fact #4

fuck i wrote a rant - again

>>4741

check out this John Ehrlichman's quote:

>The Nixon campaign in 1968 had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.

and compare it with this Barack Obama quote:

>the Snowden issue vastly overstated the dangers to US citizens in terms of spying. The fact of the matter is, our intelligence agencies are pretty scrupulous about US persons. If it's technologically possible to make an impenetrable device or system, where encryption is so strong that there's no key then how do we apprehend the child pornographer?

now, i swear i'm not an tinfoil hat, but for me the cause of the demonization of hebe/pedophilia is obviously political

>>5923

The photo basically sums it up for me.

Live well, find joy in life, don't let things you can't control get you down and don't let the assholes make you as miserable as they are.

>>5929

>Are there any older pedos out there (not using it as a derogatory… get over it)

I'm not a paedophile, but if I were, I'd object to that terminology. In my case, though, I can just ignore it because it does not apply to me.

Also, LOL, fucking normie.

It's not going anywhere, but it's also normal. If you're not exclusive, you're a complete normalfag.

The guilt and paranoia will go away in time.

>>5903

Different anon here. Yeah, I condemn that guy. Why don't you condemn fucking ISIS? Saying you ain't condemning shit weakens you in this debate. Now, carry on.

>>5906

Because we have nothing to do with ISIS

"Condemning" implies that I am somehow responsible for their actions. I dont even consider ISIS to be real Muslims.

Personally, I admire Craig Hicks- he was not a pussyshit unlike most atheists and went out and removed a few theists. Too bad you are throwing your buddy under the bus for the sake of political correctness

>>5917

Bullshit. You can condemn people you have nothing to do with with ease. I condemn the sick fucks that actually abuse children for example. I'd kill them all if I got the chance.

>>5917

>>You are simply recycling arguments you guys made 15 years ago.

The arguments are being recycled because the problems haven't gone away or changed.

Cancer still exists so there are still people trying to find a cure for it.

>>I would like you to condemn Craig Hicks

Of course I condemn Craig Hicks - my stance against brutality is what makes me hate Isis and Boko Haram and islamo-fascism - all of whom you clearly support:

> I aint gonna condemn shit.

Isis etc are doing what they do in your name - they are part of the Umma, they are your moZlem brothers, they are defining what it means to be a moZlem nowadays.

When a 'paedo' rapes or kills a child it behoves (look it up in a dictionary) all decent paedophiles to make clear that this is the OPPOSITE of real paedophilia.

And not to make excuses for them or to employ 'whataboutery' as you endlessly do.

When a moZlem murders innocent people decent moZlems should do the same.

Your refusal to condemn isis etc shows that deep down you wish them success. By not condemning them you are contributing to the idea that they speak for all moZlems.

If you have shit on the bottom of your shoe you'd best wipe it off quickly otherwise people will start thinking it's YOU that smells of shit and not just your shoe.

>>5922

Fine, but I dont see why he had to assume that I support ISIS or Boko Haram. No Muslim I know of supports them. Those guys happily kill any Muslim that stands in their way.

It just shows intellectual laziness and dishonesty to assume ISIS=regular Muslims. Even other Islamists think they are pure scum.

>>5939

>The arguments are being recycled because the problems haven't gone away or changed.

Don't you ask yourself why we haven't changed? I mean, if I actually agreed with your arguments, I would have been an atheist long time ago. In fact, the opposite has happened…

Plus, as a paedo living in the West, you have a lot more to fear from fellow Westerners than from us.

>Cancer still exists so there are still people trying to find a cure for it.

Cancer, unlike conscious people, lacks sentience, and therefore cannot be reasoned out of existence. Religion, since it rests in rational minds, should have been exterminated a long time ago, but it has not.

> all of whom you clearly support:

uhhh… where did I say I support them?

Are you grasping at straws? Dont do that, it makes you look desperate.

>Isis etc are doing what they do in your name

And so did Craig Hicks, Stalin, etc do in you name as an atheist.

So did Marc Dutroux, Salvatore Sicari, and Charlie Jaynes, did in your name as a paedophile. It doesnt mean anything if evil people do evil things in "your name"

Plus, ISIS would kill me if they ever caught me. They kill tons of religious Muslims all the time. Not only dont I support them, I simply cannPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Was previous thread not good enough for you?

>>>/phile/4994

>>5932

Good stuff, thanks.

There is inevitably a lot more information out there.. that thread is a little lacking in substance. If the conversation continues more information will come to light.

The most success I have had with it is when I question why people believe what they do, then I ask them about their own experiences.

Often many people feel it is ok if kids play around, but not with adults as there is motive in there. That's an assumption and largely fed by the media and other BS.

One woman I know is in her 20's and she had sexual contact with an adult as a child, and it was a positive experience.

She was suffering a little because of how society claimed she should feel vs. how she does feel.

Moral Panic by Philip Jenkins and Harmful To Minors by Judith Levine are two good texts to own.

They're a bit outdated (meaning pre-BitTorrent and darkweb) but still worth checking out.

>are all men pedophiles?

>passion despair

>david's world

Are there any other female homosexual MAPs here? I'm really starting to feel sad.

>>5870

>"Didn't catch that, but a picture w/ timestamp doesn't depend on your wisdom teeth."

The youtube video depends on my teeth because its hard to talk with a swollen mouth lol

>"I don't really mind, although I find it slightly disrespective."

….ok, you can believe whatever :'(

>>5877

>"shown your voice too."

I actually have not shown my voice yet, maybe you are thinking of someone else??? lmao >.<

>"btw if u need any advice on video or audio editing or you wanna talk to some maps for support hit me up."

Ur the best bud !!!!

>>5883

>"I just think she sounds too normal"

im not normal at all, I just don't talk about that stuff haha.

>>5893

>" written text can easily be faked and even the picture can be taken from somewhere else. If you're willing to give proof, you should record a video with sound where you read someone's post aloud. But even if you're an undercover cop, people here should be smart enough to not do anything stupid."

I see how people think I could be a fake. I will do what you suggested and read some post questions I have received and also talk about some paraphillas I find interesting/relatable. :)

>>5896

They're more common than you might think. Once in high school a gf once asked me to pick up one of her friends who turned out to be 11 or 12 and looked way younger. I got caught staring and on the way back to her house my gf basically told me "Uh uh, back off. I saw her first. She's mine!"

Many girls and women are into girls at least as much as guys, some of whom are single with daughters. And obviously there are millions of us guys who like girls. So don't feel sad. You're in good company, and as more people start waking up to what really matters in life it won't be long until being pedo/hebe/MAP isn't any different from being gay.

>>5912

>"I love your attitude, Elsie."

why thank you :) i've had a lot of experience with people looking down upon me/thinking im lying, yeah, so that's why I don't let stuff get to me.

>>5944

>"Many girls and women are into girls at least as much as guys"

true, I mean I am into little girls. But Im also into older guys.

>"and as more people start waking up to what really matters in life it won't be long until being pedo/hebe/MAP isn't any different from being gay."

hopefully!!!! :)

The law is generalised for a reason and there's exceptions. For example, you can drive through a red light to make way for an emergency vehicle.

Children are thought to not be able to consent as a rule. I believe the legal and medical establishment is beginning to realise that informed consent is possible for some young kids.. but the rule exists. I believe working on this, firstly, making the AoC a little more flexible, is a good move.

Perhaps if the parent consents, the child can be assessed psychologically for capacity to consent, therefore legally permitting the child to do so.

This seems to be the main sticking point in the justice system. The whole situation is based on assumptions and frankly, we can do better.

Mentally incapacitated persons can be tested for capacity to give informed consent, why can't children? Social conscience restricts the question even being asked.

>>5933

We have no idea when we're done because we keep discussing and giving lengthy needless explanations. We should try to keep answers as short as possible so we could turn this into a vote.

>>5935

>>5935

>Perhaps if the parent consents, the child can be assessed psychologically for capacity to consent, therefore legally permitting the child to do so.

>This seems to be the main sticking point in the justice system. The whole situation is based on assumptions and frankly, we can do better.

The root cause of the problem then, the way I see it is not so much consent-incompetent minors, but incompetent parents in general.

Which frankly, I also see reflected in the way the legal system just suddenly "kicks you out of the nest" when you turn of the various mish-mash of legal ages, of so-called "protections" that minors "enjoy" under the law, and basically washes its hands of what happens to you and leave you to make mistakes and expect you to learn from them and own up to your own responsibility.

Why, for example, is there different ages for criminal responsibility, sexual responsibility, and legal responsibility?

Part of the problem is how the state views people, and how parents view their children: As having less rights because they have power over them and that makes it easier.

I don't really much like to discuss on chans though, too poor forum-structure and too many trolls / mental cases.

>>5933

Lately I've been hearing more and more about sex, CP, children, etc on my favorite podcasts. To my surprise the guys I listen to most who are parents have said that they treat their own kids like people instead of babies, interacting with them as they would any other adult. As a result they've matured well beyond their years and are excelling in ways their classmates and friends probably never will.

The sooner a person can walk, talk, and think for themselves the better. Of course the antis would disagree, which is confusing because you'd think everyone would be in favor of educating children sooner and more effectively. It's as if those with power and/or influence don't want anyone to be more capable or independent, children least of all, if only because they want someone to pretend to defend so they can act heroic.

George Carlin put it best about over-protecting kids: "You've turned them into little cult objects, you have a child fetish, and it's NOT healthy! You wanna help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone!" Better still, give them whatever support and tools they need in order to learn (ie the internet) and encourage them to excel in every way.

Education and freedom solve most of the big problems we keep ranting about. As long as they're held back this will remain (at least in the minds of morons) a world of victims and predators where the pricks in charge keep coming up with excuses to torture and exterminate all deviants, starting with us.

>>5940

Haha, isn't that the reason for most laws? People don't act responsibly XD

>>5941

I once had a mid teens girl tell me that she likes me because I treat her like a human being. I asked her how everyone else treats her and she stated that they treat her "like a little kid". They never give her the chance to be an adult..

She acts completely different around me because I give her that responsibility. Of course I am smart with it, I wouldn't hand her the keys to the car or hand her alcohol.. that's my responsibility. Anyways, I think you are right.

We should be encouraging people to think as early as possible. Use it or lose it. Learning how to think is important, critical thought is essential nowadays.

I think the antis and others would support that, it allows people to make a more educated decision. It could be portrayed to the antis that the kids could see through grooming attempts, and that is true. But they'd also be able to decide for themselves if they wish to reciprocate or not. :P

>>5878

2nd *MAP*philia = *MAP*philia*

>>5878

2nd *MAP*philia = **MAP*philia*

>>5879

>>5880

Fixed that filter, fixed your posts accordingly. I'm trying to discourage the use of the slur (intentional or not), "pedo." But it doesn't seem that I can make the filters specific enough to not catch things they shouldn't.

Honestly, that American spelling is used so seldom for actual paedophilia that you should just spell it the original way for clarity.

>>5878

Well said. Good to see these discussions are continuing, if only because our prisons are at nearly double capacity and there's not enough money to keep treating all deviants the same as rabid dogs, even the mostly-harmless ones. Sadly most people have already made up their minds and it's practically impossible to get anyone to listen or think logically when it comes to certain topics. The more we think of children as people and the less they're treated like a sacred and endangered species the more progress will be made.

On a more serious note, does anyone else think that maybe people are becoming more open-minded because the internet has allowed us to see exactly what everyone else has been secretly into all these years? Not too long ago pedophilia was about as evil as you could get. Now we get the same kinda hate homosexuals had to deal with in the 70s and 80s. I'm not holding my breath for hands-on acceptance, but it wouldn't surprise me if fantasy, looking at images, and even coming out is safe in the near future.

>>5945

It could take a lot longer than a generation or two that it took to accept gays because of the whole "think of the children" mentality. Child protection laws are getting more strict, not less. And sex crimes are the only crimes where no one shows mercy to the perpetrators.

>>5913

You think calling someone a bigot, among countless other relatively baseless accusations, isn't "calling names"? Lady, engage directly or shut the fuck up. You're being tremendously passive aggressive and shitting up the board. We don't want that here. This isn't fucking /younglove/. Drop it. Also, unironic use of "bigot" in the way you've been using it is the mark of a supreme leftard newfag. This is the Internet. We call people mean names.

Now I'm going to reluctantly respond to the rest of your post. Try not to be a stupid asshole if you want the discussion to continue.

>It's not the feminists or even the feminazis.. things changed as society changed and unfortunately, we did it wrong. Influence of the church on behaviour deemed acceptable undoubtedly caused changes.

>blaming religion instead of feminism

More leftard points.

>Please, all men, realise. There are female paedophiles out there. We number more than you think. People don't like visiting places where they are unwelcome. Talking about females likes so many do around here.. it drives us out.

This is the most open and welcoming board on 8chan. You'd have a point if you were on >>>/hebe/. But here, we are generally pretty nice. You just had a disagreement with one anon, and then you used your confirmation bias to start acting like a martyr. You need to realize your mistake and chill out.

>Blaming all women is just… pathetic and wrong. There are a lot of MAP females out there and you are blaming them too.

Gawd, such a SJW. Nobody here blames all women for this shit. However, women are most likely disproportionately responsible for this shit. And a lot of us have personal experiences that offer credence to that end.

Honestly, stop being offended and start, I dunno, working on solutions or something.

>>5921

Yeah I didn't have to call him names.. I know that. If someone wants to discuss something with me, they don't open with an attack. Simple as that. Anyways

I have already said that I am not going to respond to such people, so can we drop it now?

Some of the feminists are to blame. Some of the church is to blame. I don't think any single group is wholly to blame, I think the situation is much more complex than that and we would be shooting ourselves in the heart to overly simplify. It actually would inevitably disadvantage us as more than one factor plays into the situation.

The fact of the matter is, every SJW and hater aside, the common thought is that we are all rapists. They think that we would assault their children. They "know this", they think that sexual contact inevitably hurts children. When you believe something, you disregard facts to the contrary. ie: Many children masturbate almost from the time they walk, some do it beforehand. It is natural.

I think the first step would be to get health professionals, be they psychologists, neurologists or school counselors to come out and state clearly that children can be sexual and grasp what that means. Nobody listens to the screaming minorities anyway.. when people "know better" than the SJW's… things will change.

>This is the most open and welcoming board on 8chan. You'd have a point if you were on >>>/hebe/. But here, we are generally pretty nice. You just had a disagreement with one anon, and then you used your confirmation bias to start acting like a martyr. You need to realize your mistake and chill out.

Dude I am generalising, the entire body of MAP's tends to be fairly.. anti woman. Have you seen the GL forums? It ain't pretty….

At very least, we are told we need to provide photos, camera proof.. basically we are told we are answerable to any dude on the internet that wants to challenge our gender statement. Then comes the nasty messPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>5921

Yeah I didn't have to call him names.. I know that. If someone wants to discuss something with me, they don't open with an attack. Simple as that. Anyways

I have already said that I am not going to respond to such people, so can we drop it now?

Some of the feminists are to blame. Some of the church is to blame. I don't think any single group is wholly to blame, I think the situation is much more complex than that and we would be shooting ourselves in the heart to overly simplify. It actually would inevitably disadvantage us as more than one factor plays into the situation.

The fact of the matter is, every SJW and hater aside, the common thought is that we are all rapists. They think that we would assault their children. They "know this", they think that sexual contact inevitably hurts children. When you believe something, you disregard facts to the contrary. ie: Many children masturbate almost from the time they walk, some do it beforehand. It is natural.

I think the first step would be to get health professionals, be they psychologists, neurologists or school counselors to come out and state clearly that children can be sexual and grasp what that means. Nobody listens to the screaming minorities anyway.. when people "know better" than the SJW's… things will change.

>This is the most open and welcoming board on 8chan. You'd have a point if you were on >>>/hebe/. But here, we are generally pretty nice. You just had a disagreement with one anon, and then you used your confirmation bias to start acting like a martyr. You need to realize your mistake and chill out.

Dude I am generalising, the entire body of MAP's tends to be fairly.. anti woman. Have you seen the GL forums? It ain't pretty….

At very least, we are told we need to provide photos, camera proof.. basically we are told we are answerable to any dude on the internet that wants to challenge our gender statement. Then comes the nasty messPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>5921

Dude you couldn't offend me if you tried. I was attempting to get through to a bigot. I failed. Shit happens.

I take everything online with a grain of salt. I hope to find interesting discussions, as opposed to being told that my very existence is why someone is miserable and that all women are to blame. I hope not to be classified, labeled and attacked because I just happen to be a lesbian.

I have been consistently working on solutions for years. I have been studying in various fields so I can make a difference. Honestly, I would stay a paedophile if I was presented with a choice to not be one. To me, young girls are the most beautiful thing in the world and I wouldn't ever want to change my appreciation for that. Self hate? Ha, never.

I am appealing to reason and that is not always welcome. Our brains prefer what we think and believe over what we are presented with, old information over new. If you are interested in having a conversation on how we can change peoples minds, I am all for it. If you just want to point fingers.. don't bother. I don't need yet another person saying exactly the same thing. I have heard it all before.

I am a female, I am a lesbian, I am a paedophile. Not once have I stopped an adult from having an age disparity relationship nor have I ever spoken out against such a thing, I am all for it. (Within reason)

I am for women's rights, but also men's rights and children's rights. In fact, you could simply state I am against oppression of anyone. (And the politicization of things that do not belong in the political sphere of influence!)

I'd like people to remember that. I am not the reason they cannot love the object of their affections, far, far from it. Every woman did not do something against you. I am a paedophile, just like you. I am subject to the same political crap that is going on, just like you.

The difference is that I can talk to other women in a way you cannot, I am trusted in a way that you are not. I can reach those that will just see you as a predatPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>5921

Sorry for the double post, it told me it failed the first time.

>>5842

What is RIGHT, is to put someone like that first and protect her.

But no, he is looking in the mirror at what he gets out of it, or doesn't. Me, me, me, me…

What if I was cellibate? Am I suddenly then not doing the right thing? No, you lot are downright selfish.

It is because of people like you that paedophilia has been associated exclusively with sex.

If you creeps didn't push sex like it was as important as breathing, relationships would be possible.

Love, would be possible. That would be the first step, rather than jumping straight to "sex is ok!".

But no, narrow minds….. You're shooting yourself in the feet, and other places. But that didn't occur to you did it?

I am not doing the wrong thing by not sleeping with her. How fucked is your logic to think that I am… such idiocy..

>>5884

All right, you presumptuous asshole, km about to take you to town.

I've been against premarital sex my entire life. Ever since I figured out what sex was.

I don't give two shits about sex. I've never had sex. But, I don't want it to be so that I never fucking do. At that point, I failed as a human being.

I had a girlfriend. She was twelve years old and extremely innocent. She was my only true happiness. I would never have fucked her or done anything else to ruin that innocence.

Presumptuous cunts like you, you're the reason we're oppressed and miserable. "Durr, all men care only about sex!" That line of thinking is precisely why we get nowhere, why everyone hates us. Because fucks like you think we just want sex. If people would just stop thinking this, we'd get somewhere. People would be able to think logically about it and realize that a responsible older guy loving their daughter is a good thing. IF PEOPLE DIDN'T THINK LIKE YOU, I'D HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO DEFEND MYSELF, INSTEAD OF JUST BEING VANISHED ON. I MIGHT STILL HAVE MY BEST FRIEND AND TRUE LOVE, YOU FUCKING MAN HATING DYKE.

So, yeah, fuck you, stop being such a huge fucking bitch. I believe in love and standing up for love. Not making the stereotypes true.

Incidentally, you're so fucking worried about this girl you think is into you. My girl, according to mutual friends, is "just fine." She's definitely brainwashed, but that's it. And it might have been her who sold me out in the first place. I don't know for sure. If it was, then she wasn't quite the angel I thought her to be, but I may not know for sure for some time yet. Digging for Intel hurts so badly that I rarely try. When I found out about the possibility that she might have willingly sold me out, I was depressed for the entire week and cut school for that week, spending three days mostly just lying around in the house.

TRIGGERED AF.Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>5889

I went by what YOU SAID, fucking loser.

I stated that I don't have sexual contact with her because of the potential ramifications.

You went off like a fuckwit, like you just did then.. because of what you THOUGHT you read.

You're a homophobic, misogynist piece of shit who can't accept blame for his own fuckups. Blame women for everything… your own misery… typical. You don't know me at all, I'll have to tell my male friends how much I hate them, I must have forgotten… Ill tell them a hate filled know it all on a chanboard told me. They will laugh at you just as much as I am.

Go drown in the koolaid. You're too far down the rabbit hole of bias to be reached. You are the source of your own misery. You can't see the world for what it is because of your own biases.

Absolutely pathetic.

I need more pics

Realy beliebe you are a trap

>>5899

You're the biased one here, clearly. Read what you write before you post it. This entire post is literally just name calling against the person you're supposed to be debating. His main argument was that you were discriminating against men, something you did almost nothing to refute. You're posting from Tor, so I can't ban you, though I can disable Tor if it's abused to flame users. If you want to have screaming matches, you go to >>>/younglove/. Posts like this that do nothing but tear down others without making any rational, logic based arguments aren't allowed on this board. Derailing threads is also not allowed. Don't keep this up, or I'll have no choice but to delete any further offending messages, which would be a waste of your time and effort.

>>5731

I've had several incidents like this. First was at a lake locker room. A 12?yr old saw me inside naked cuz I had showered and wasn't really hidden from the public. When I saw her looking at me I pretended I hasn't seen her. Took my time drying off and paid extra attending to my cock. Then I had to rub lotion on my face and body because who wants dry skin? :)

She ended up with 3 more girls crowding the doorway pretending to do whatever girls do.

Of course by that time the lotion had made it's way all over my cock. Right before I blew my load I looked up at them and shot in their direction. Their expressions clearly showed that they enjoyed the show. I really enjoyed giving them one too:)

>>5801

Shoulda got doze gal's numbers. Maybe you could have blown your next load on one of their faces. 😜

>>5801

moar

>>5731

I didn't expose myself, but did wake up one morning to discover my lady friend's 9 year-old daughter had snuck into bed with us.

I woke up with my morning wood sticking into the girl's butt. When I backed away, she just scooted right back to me.

Her mother had a good laugh while I was freaking out about because I had no drawers on.

>>5905

Wow, great fucking parents. Fucking with the doors unlocked with a child in the house. Anyway, maybe this woman will let you have some fun with the kid.

>>5786

Then you will probably never have loli. 😞

>>5790

im schizotypal, im afraid of people so no loli anyway

>>5795

Oh, well, that sucks.

I know these feels.

I'm in my mid-20s and it pisses me off that I've basically given up on women already. I've had tons of sexual encounters through my life but it's never been satisfying, because I'm never really into it. I pretended I wanted to "fuck all the hot bitches" basically to fit in with my friends. But I just can't bother to keep up the charade anymore.

Fortunately I don't particularly want kids, and I'm good being alone, but what worries me is what happens as I get older. I have a great social life now cuz I'm still young. But what about when everyone's paired off except for me? People's social lives seem to focus more and more on their families as everyone gets older. Right now I can be all "friends all day and loli hentai all night" but what about 20 years from now? I start freaking out when I think too much about that.

OP here - sorry it has been a while.

>>5715

>How have you functioned up to this point?

By not having girlfriends and by avoiding talking about sexual relationships with my friends because I have no experience.

>Now, then, tell me something, too. Is it true that you can find teenage girls on Tinder? Because if it is, I need to consider that.

I my area you can't. There are not many 18/19yos on it around, let alone younger girls. Either Tinder is good at moderation or young girls just don't go there. I have seen quite a few 18 yo "but i'm 13 really" girls on Badoo, however.

>>5716

> What would you do or say differently in practice if she knew?

It would be much easier if I could tell people. Otherwise there is a big mystery over why I have not had girlfriends and have so little interest in women.

>>5901

>what about 20 years from now? I start freaking out when I think too much about that.

Yup. This is my worry too. I am approaching 30 and wondering what the point is to my life.

Sure officer what Police Station do you work at so I can e mail you ?????

>>5639

niggas be gettin lazy

mobama@whitehouse.gov luv 2 trade