[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/phile/ - For those who think young.

Show some <18 love.

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C | Buy Bitcoin easily in the US | Buy Bitcoin anonymously all over the world | Bitcoin FAQ
Ben "givin' the boot to moot" Garrison is selling mugs, T-shirts and mousepads as an official partner. 10% of sales of these items go to the Infinity Development Group!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.

We can now have custom images for Image Deleted, Spoiler, and No File. Upload 'em to the banners and flags thread!

File: 1425734921891.jpg (67.79 KB, 800x597, 800:597, 1422302903222.jpg)

af2e71 No.2242

So i found this on /b/
https://wikileaks.org/wiki/An_insight_into_child_porn
What do you think about it?

58f9d6 No.2245

Reads like fiction.

af2e71 No.2246

>>2245
For me it sounded legit and interesting.

58f9d6 No.2247

>>2246
Parts of it may be true, but overall, the vibe is that it's constructed.

Especially the technical details sounds weird.

And there's an underlying bias there, which makes me think the guy having written it, has an agenda.

I could read it more closely, but I generally prefer not to do that when it comes to this kind of stuff, because it sticks and stays with me for a while.

That said, I'm not an anti and I'm not against low-level CP (under 7/10 on the Copine scale), I just don't feel comfortable thinking about it.

I've even had to take leave out of work, after having had to talk to a very smart qt π and tell her that she couldn't do certain touchy-feely things with me.

af2e71 No.2248

>>2247
>(under 7/10 on the Copine scale)
What's that?

58f9d6 No.2249

>>2248
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COPINE_scale

6: Explicit Erotic Posing, Pictures emphasising genital areas, where the child is either naked, partially clothed or fully clothed.

7: Explicit Sexual Activity, Pictures that depict touching, mutual and self-masturbation, oral sex and intercourse by a child, not involving an adult.

So I'm fine with 6, but not 7.
If that clarifies.

af2e71 No.2250

>>2249
Sounds legit and understandable.

28d296 No.2256

>>2247
What is your job?

>>2249
7 sounds kinda hawt, tho…

58f9d6 No.2258

>>2256
>> What is your job?

After-school, working with kids between the ages of 6-9.

49316f No.2263

>>2258
Nice, how did you land it?

58f9d6 No.2269

>>2263
I don't think I should give out too much personal information, thank you.

Which goes for all of us: If you give one piece of information about yourself, that may or may not be a hundred percent accurate, that's okay, but give one related piece of information and people start thinking maybe they will have some hope of tracking you down.

You never know who's reading these sites, and there are already cognitive programs that can determine your personality profile based on what you type.

It won't be many decades before that can be linked to social media sites, mining them and comparing grammatical style, sentence structure, typos, vocabulary, and other semantical clues that could very well connect any one of the posters here, with our real life personas.

d87b02 No.2274

>>2242
Whenever I read things like these a lot of it brings up some possible truths, but then at the same time it feels like it has a sense of bias to it.
And while it is good to get those truths out, opposing people will quickly overlook them in favour of pointing out the bias and discrediting that part of it and unfortunately feel that by discrediting parts of it assume everything is discredited.

49316f No.2275

>>2269
I think you're overly cautious. You probably shouldn't worry about it to that extent. I only asked because I tried to get a job like that, but they basically totally ignored my applications. Online applications are such fucking bullshit. I feel like you've got almost no chance with anything that's online.

d87b02 No.2276

>>2275
Statisticians would say. It's 20% chance through online, and 80% through networking.
Sorry, if it's a bit unfortunate for those who aren't really sociable.

58f9d6 No.2295

>>2275
Well, I advice trying to build up your skillset and experience.
Is there any volounteer-work that you can do, that not only demonstrates your initiative and interests in working with minors, but also exposes you to the kind of experience an employer would want you to have, to be certain that you knew what kind of challenges working with minors entails, and that he wouldn't just waste his time bringing you up to speed only to have you give up in a few months?

Try to look at your employment prospects from your employer's perspective.

49316f No.2296

>>2295
At the time, I had some very nice volunteer stuff on my resume. Now, though, shit, I probably would look terrible to potential employers, because I basically don't do shit.

58f9d6 No.2317

>>2296
Well maybe you should start there, then.

Set goals for yourself, expose yourself to people and situations and organisations that might result in your opportunities expanding.

263da6 No.2352

>>2317
Yeah, this
>expose yourself to people

58f9d6 No.2364

>>2352
Yeah… I didn't quite mean it that way, but w/e.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]