/phile/ - For those who think young.

>>3031

Pretty much my reaction. You guys are great, don't get too scripted.

Here's an idea, why not highlight good threads and comment on the best and worst parts, or point out the shitposts. If you insist on reading threads verbatim, try switching up the voices some. Hell, I'll come on for that, do some mad voice-acting for you.

I liked all of it but i disagree on some stances but that is to be expected, what i think was downplayed is the double standard with words like creep and i dont think words like that should be used as they are now either, also how it is used as a slur against people girls and women don't find attractive or that fit the mass media stereotype, there was a good video about it on youtube i embedded the video, other constructive criticism would be to target feminists hipocricy and double standards.

I could supply some study material as books and articles.

>>3041

Go vote up "The C Word." 😉

For the easy listening perspective the podcast did well on my part. I could follow most of it, chuckle when needed and it was not unpleasant to listen to.

I would listen to the next episodes, hopefully streamed one day.

Too much lurking and not enough posting. I'm very disappointed. I'll probably have to go knock some heads around in the fucking /b/ thread.

*sigh*

Not looking forward to going back into that fucking hugbox.

The obligatory Chris Hansen hate was totally off base, especially with how the exclusive pedo kid called out people for being pedos who were unsure. Then on the To Catch a Predator topic acted like the people in the clips were only there to "chill and have a few drinks", which is clearly not the case if either of you two ever paid attention to the show. Also, call it entrapment, but every one of them showed intent especially by showing up to the houses (usually with condoms or other accessories)

>>3031

Going to have to agree on this as well.

I hope to see more personalities on the show like the original plan.

>>3660

There's nothing "obligatory" about it. They ruined people's lives for just wanting to bang some slutty teens. Fuck that.

>>3661

i feel like as long as they were honest about themselves it'd be more okay. if not, then you're basically lying to the girl. just like any guys lie to girls. that's not really that cool. they should know if they should expect a 20 yr old or a 34 year old at least.

>>3661

"just wanting to bang some slutty teens."

And lie about their own age, bring recording devices, drugs, and whatever fetish items they would want to bring. They were only there to fuck a kid and try and get away with it. I would say that's pretty emotionally damaging.

>>3661

Just because you hate women because your mother was a relentless ugly Cunt doesn't mean all women are. MAPs can't get rights by supporting bad behaviors.

>>3660

>Then on the To Catch a Predator topic acted like the people in the clips were only there to "chill and have a few drinks", which is clearly not the case if either of you two ever paid attention to the show. Also, call it entrapment, but every one of them showed intent especially by showing up to the houses (usually with condoms or other accessories)

They obviously came to fuck, but you cannot tell me that most of the "predators" on the show are socially normal. A lot of them, perhaps most, are socially awkward messes who haven't even touched pussy before, which is why they have to use the internet to chat up girls. That's what makes this entrapment really fucked up. Let me give you an example: Most airports have a bar, but if you're drunk, you can't get on the plane. They won't allow it. Wouldn't it be a little fucked up if the security, or flight attendants, went through the waiting aisles and invited people to go the bar and get smashed? Like yeah, most people would be smart enough to say no. But for some alcoholics, they can't control themselves. They go into the bar with the intent to drink.

It's also worth noting that these guys are not rapists. They may bring condoms and toys and shit but they still sought out consensual sex. I don't know about you, but when I was 14 I wasn't a fucking dumb child who couldn't understand consent. For some reason the antis think that if a 14 year old consents to another 14 year old, it's totally okay and normal but a 14 year old consenting with a 22 year old is completely fucked up and is not old enough to understand what they're doing. That's just retarded.

>>3843

Damn straight. This is why those fucking normies need to get an education or a bullet.

>>3843

MAPs are retarded. You can't really this vapid. Are you saying that MAPs are too dumb to understand the law? That MAPs have no self-control?

If you know something is illegal but still do it? You are to blame. Even if a child "wants it" you know the laws right? So you know the law but lack morals, self-control to follow them? Then you face the consequences. MAPs are the most pathetic, sorry, retarded group. You can't lack self-control nor disregard the law and think people will feel sorry for you. Then you make excuses, "the girls consented". It just further proves why you MAPs can't and won't be trusted. You can't get upset that you are seen as monsters when you disregard laws and only care about getting your dick wet in underage pussy. You MAPs also ignore the guardians in this. If we feel our daughters aren't ready or we want you to leave her alone should respect that. You don't even care.

>>3853

Ah, violence. It's not like MAPs are seen as monsters…. You think we should get bullets for putting a child's welfare over your dick? How awful. It's like you guys don't want to be seen as good.

Of course the script will be flipped onto me because, well, it's much easier than possibly reconsidering one's perspective.

>>3956

>So you know the law but lack morals, self-control to follow them.

Laws have nothing to do with morals, look back at the prohibition. Would you say that everyone who made their own booze against the law was immoral and lacked self control ? Or what about racial seggragtion and legal slavery, I bet you think those laws were morally right too?

History has shown plenty of laws that were bullshit and people disobayed them and it lead to the change of those laws.

We aren't ever complaining that the laws in general are upheld, we're mad that such abritrary laws, like the age of concent exist at all and are punished as severely as they are.

>You MAPs also ignore the guardians in this. If we feel our daughters aren't ready or we want you to leave her alone should respect that. You don't even care..

well what about this family? Where the parents thought that the relationship between them was fine and that the 19 year old adult wasnt a sex offender.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/19-year-spend-25-years-registered-sex-offender/story?id=32783206

The law didn't give a shit what parents of the girl thought or what the girl her self thought. This isn't the only family that this has happened to.

The goverment shouldn't decided who gets to have sex and what kind of sex they should have and nether should the majority about sex they aren't involved in.

>Ah, violence. It's not like MAPs are seen as monsters…. You think we should get bullets for putting a child's welfare over your dick? How awful. It's like you guys don't want to be seen as good.

Oh, you want to see about people being good? Have you ever seen the comment sections in anything ever ?

wether its on our own 8chan.

http://8ch.net/pedotalk/

http://8ch.net/b/res/4283020.html

Or maybe someplace more civilized and leftist like cracked's comment section

www.cracked.com/ personal-experiences-1760-5-things-i-learned-infiltrating-deep-web-child-molesters.html

or really anywhere where pedophila is mentioned, a good half of the comments are going to be "kill all pedophiles as grusome as possible"

Making comments about killing those you disagree with is just something every group of people does.

>>3596

>only care about getting your dick wet in underage pussy

guy, real talk for a second, that line I just put in green is pretty damn identifiable. I've seen you around here usually in the pedophile boards like /phile and /younglove and I wonder. Are you a satire ? Are we supposed to look at your comments and think "ha ha, yeah those antis, nice one anon" because thats not what we see.

Its like everytime you say something you give something for anti to look at instead of reading our defences and you bring ever discussion to a halt because of it. Next to people who make use threads to take up personal arguements, you are the greatest hinderence these boards will ever have.

If you really aren't an anti like you say, you'd quit dismissing all of pedophilia and starting a fight everytime someone says something that would make your mother mad.

I know who you are and I try my best to ignore you but alot of people here don't and really think fighting you off means something.

This is just after listening to the second episode. I thought it was miles away better than the first in every way. It wasn't awkward, there seemed to be a nice segmented schedule, and the sound clips were a nice touch that added a lot of production value. Keep up the good work