/phile/ - For those who think young.

>>3792

>All right y'all, this is my first post here after being a /hebe/rew until Colby decided to be autistic.

Oh, God, finally! I hope there are more to follow soon.

As for your main topic, I think that pro-MAP M's are what really lend credibility. We might have one here if an asshole from /hebe/ hadn't fucking doxed her and made her run. Then Asshole Colby goes and bans her. What a stupid fucking shithead.

Weigh in, regulars.

>>3793

No, you don't know anything about the girl. First she could have been an adult. I, as a woman, still get confused for a teenager even though I'm in my 20's. Next if she was a child I doubt her parents know she was posting those pictures. I actually cyber chatted and even cyber sexed with adults. However if my parents found out they would have claimed "something was wrong with me" and the adults were predators (false I decided what I was comfortable with). You need to get the parents of minors involved. If they support it then it will give you credibility. To just have the minor involved will allow antis to claim. "Predator", "lured" "innocent girl" "evil pedo" and other overused, misused tags.

>>3796

Why do I want to bone that so badly?

I had an idea about this though I don't know how legal it would be.

You take a bunch of happy faces from pizza, and line them up with an equal number of just faces of kids playing, and say half these children were "abused". Just to highlight it.

Of course a better tag line would be good, and some way if getting the faces without possessing the pizza. Then like get a billboard or something.

I'm talking out of my ass.

>>3798

I don't see why it'd be illegal. I mean, if it's just faces and nothing suggestive or explicit, then it's people's own internal prejudices that guide them to false conclusions, and that in and of itself could be a conversation starter, but the main thing is that you'd have to appear in such numbers as to not be assaulted, or deal with sensible people, neither of which is a guarantee when discussing this kind of shit.

>>3801

No, never mind, I want to put my dick in >>3796 so particularly bad because it's the stoic slut bitch not looking stoic, slutty, or bitchy.

>>3796

Glad you agree and it was me who suggested that men help their lgf. I was disappointed it was perceived as prostitute by many posters. Unless you are only interested in sex with kids(personally I think that will only make MAPs look worse) to support and care for your lgf is beneficial for both sides.

Most MAPs I run across want a relationship, and because this relationship is like any other (the adult always has the ultimate power) if the adult accepts and admits that they can use their authority for good .I never understood why MAPs try to convince people that they can make the relationship equal and that mentally/emotionally/physical kids are just as developed as adults. Rather accept that adults do have the upper hand but they will only use that to benefit the child.

For example in traditional gender roles the man has the power, while the woman obeys his authority. This relationship is not intrinsically harmful/wrong. It only becomes wrong if the man lacks morals. If the man is a good person his wife will be happy and well taken care of. Thus if the adult in the relationship is good, the child will not be harmed nor delevop any issues. Just like a man who makes an income buys and supplies for the wife, so should the adult for the child relationship.

I did this on my phone so excuse me for not proof reading.

>>3813

Yeah, "power imbalance" is horse shit. There's always an imbalance. That's no reason to forbid us from ever being happy.

>>3849

This seems suspicious. I haven't clicked it, though. Report if spam.

>>3851

It's spam. They are always spam.

>>3855

K, deleted and banned. Thanks for that tip.

>>3820

Um you clearly confused. Where did I say imbalance doesn't exist?

I hope you aren't one of those, "adults and kids are the same" because then you are wasting both our times.

2 average adults have will always less imbalances than and adult and child.

MAPs like you fail to accept reality thus won't get rights. If you accept this:

Kids have GUARDIANS that make decisions for them. If guardians decide basically everything they should be involved.

Generally speaking :Kids are less developed than adults in the following ways: mentally, physically, experience wise, emotionally, etc. Don't ignore science it makes you less credible.

Kids legally have less rights.

Kids are usually have less education than adults.

There is plenty of reasons child adult relationships HAVE MORE IMBALANCES

than a typical adult/adult relationship. Instead of pretending that you (I'm assuming you are educated, average intelligence, employed, wise, emotionally mature, no brain damage) are on the same level as an underage child. Rather recognize you have the power in the relationship but you are a good person (right?) thus I could trust you to date my daughter with my permission. It is like giving your child a godparent with a possible sexual components. Godparents are entrusted with the child because they have the qualities that the parents wants their child to have. They know the godparent will only serve to improve and benefit the child.

You sound like a MAP who is only interested in sex from girls. Or you seem to think you should have free access to girls without parental involvement. Nope. As a mother I and my husbandwould have no problem with my underage child dating a man if I was involved and set the rules. I actually went to college with a guy who was 20 dating a 14 year old. They got married when she turned 18 and their relationship is strong. So I know it can work. He didn't sneak and it wasn't about sex. Her parents fully approved, his friends including me fully approved. You can't come off as some entitled jerk like yourself and think people will give you their child. Parents are responsible for their child and if you refuse to accept the strong and blaring imbalances unique to adult/child relationships then you don't deserve to date girls.

Honestly I'm glad most MAPs I see actually are good people. I will fight for their rights but a person like you? Nah. You are a huge reason MAPs struggle.

>>3927

Wow, bitch, how the fuck do you conclude that I'm an asshole just by the fact that I said "muh power balance" is a stupid thing?

>>3929

The power imbalance between a child and adults is the reason "you"don't have rights. You seem to ignore the significance of the power imbalances and seem to believe that your relationship with a child is no different than a relationship between two adults. As a parent I don't get why MAP s like yourself disregard the imbalance instead of embracing it. You have not expressed understanding of how the power imbalances is the biggest issue. You haven't recognized the guardian position on adult child relationships. You have acknowledged the major differences between adults and children. All you have is that I'm a bitch, that power imbalance is a myth/shit/insignificant and responded to nothing else. So based on all you posted you don't seem to care about anything but making yourself and your dick happy. Other posters have recognized the need of the child, the position of the parents, basically everything but themselves and avoid being selfish. The fact you are just name calling and being snarky makes me wonder what are your movtives and what issues you have as a person. In the first response you discuss "us" having rights. (Refering to you and other MAPs). This shows me you have selfish reasons for wanting kids. Because actually if you thought about the child's well-being first then it would be clear in your responses (like other posters). Rather, it is evident you only subconsciously care about the adult in the adult child relationships. Maybe I misinterpreted you and your thoughts. Maybe I offended you. However I'm not your emeny but I will criticize when I feel it's necessary. If you want to reach non-MAPs then understand your thoughts, approaches, comments, comentary may be subject to critics. Not just for you but any MAPs who reads these posts.

>>3943

I'm not selfish, nor dick-motivated. In fact, until last week, I identified as asexual, but I can't do that anymore now that SJWs have appropriated that term. Fuck SJWs. They're also the ones who cry "MUH POWER IMBALANCE." What I'm saying is that the power imbalance isn't as big as people think it is; kids are NOT stupid, and can certainly establish boundaries.

I had a girlfriend, lady, and you're hurting me immensely with your snap judgments. I didn't have a sexual relationship with her at all, and had no intention of it. She was completely innocent, and I would never have ruined that. Sure, I had more "power" in the relationship, I guess, but so fucking what? I didn't abuse that. I seemingly accidentally crossed some line just one time, and it was just cuddling. Maybe I accidentally cuddled too close to her adorable small chest, I'm not sure, but something seemed off, and I coaxed out the information that she'd been a little uncomfortable with the cuddling from the previous night, so I apologized, said to let me know if she was feeling uncomfortable again, and told her I loved her. I basically let her know that she was in control.

Now stop bashing me at every turn, shit. This fucking hurts to think about. Her mom wasn't cool like you are. I thought she would be, but she fucking was not, and after the night of January 30, which seemed like just any ordinary night, I just never saw any of them again. I couldn't fucking sleep for over an hour last night because I was thinking about this poor girl. Once I realized I loved her, nothing was about me, Nee-san. It was all her. It still fucking is. I know a few other younger girls now, and some of them are really cute, really sweet, some of the older ones sexy, even, but they don't give me anywhere near the same feeling as her. I'm stuck with a choice between what could be YEARS of waiting, or settling for something less. And I still have no clue what I should do.