/phile/ - For those who think young.

>>3794

No. Just…no. Did you read his bio? Or watch the movie about his life? He'd be the LAST guy to be on our side. He's polite to a fault, but I think, if anything would make him rage, it would be discussion of MAPs. Look, he's the best choice for the country, and I hope he gets elected, and even despite that, our time will eventually come, but don't kid yourself into believing he's on "our" side.

>>3802

Whatever, don't really care, Fiorina or Carson are A-tier, but any Republican is fine. Trump is not preferable compared to the others for the most part, but as long is it isn't the commie or the crooked bitch.

>>3804

Conservative MAPs. Glad I'm not the only one.

Nope. Once upon a time most Republicans were sane people interested in governing well and keeping us safe and not wasting too much money, but now with very few exceptions they're a bunch of right-wing nutjobs. Sorry. I'll probably go to my grave never voting for another R.

>>4162

You're a fucking idiot. Are you suggesting that the Democrats are better? Because you'd be so wrong it's not even funny.

>>4172

No, I'm outright stating that they're less bad than Republicans. Pick an issue, any issue, and there's not a one that your boy George didn't fuck up royally when he was in office.

>>4180

Democrats enable SJWs, kill baby girls that could have become lolis, steal tax dollars so sluts don't have to pay for fucking birth control pills that fuck up the water supply and make lolis hit puberty faster, causing an avalanche of other problems… need I fucking go on? You're fucking retarded if you think voting for a Democrat is acceptable.

>>>4205

>Before we turn into /pol/, I just want to say that democrats and republicans alike aren't going to be "on our side". now, we do need someone with a more progressive outlook (whether it be republican, democratic, or whatever) but that's besides the point. Honestly, we need to take this situation into our own hands. We don't need to wait for the man to give us what we want. We need to take it (and by take it I obviously don't mean what you think I mean).

>We need a social shift before a political one.

>>4205

Before we turn into /pol/, I just want to say that democrats and republicans alike aren't going to be "on our side". now, we do need someone with a more progressive outlook (whether it be republican, democratic, or whatever) but that's besides the point. Honestly, we need to take this situation into our own hands. We don't need to wait for the man to give us what we want. We need to take it (and by take it I obviously don't mean what you think I mean).

We need a social shift before a political one.

So after Obamacare gets passed I get fillings I've needed for years and nasal surgery I've needed pretty much my whole life. And now it's become clear that even with a vegetarian diet, gout is still progressing and will likely take my ability to walk within a decade or two.

You want to talk about a rich man's disease, that would be the folks (i.e. the vast majority on all pedo boards) that are so healthy and financially secure that their #1 political concern is to get someone that will lower the age of consent.

The rest of us of course wouldn't benefit from such a change (since the best girls will go to rich, healthy, attractive men) and we're just concerned about keeping our health insurance and that the government leaves the non nude folks alone. Maybe it's part of getting old?

Apparently also tried to kill someone when he was fourteen. EVEN MORE badass points.

>>4210

Libertarians might be our best bet

Fuck this guy. His campaign keeps robo-calling my house at all hours leaving long messages about why I should vote for him. I live in Canada asshole! Stop fucking with my shit! Literally…and I mean this in every sense, 4-5 times a day for 3 weeks.

>>4557

That's not his fault. Also, you just called a potential future president an asshole.

>>4564

…as we all should anytime a self-important prick wants the power to tax, arrest, and kill with diplomatic immunity. Trust no one. Question everything.

As for the doctor, he seems like controlled opposition. My money's on a fixed race between Hilary and yet another rich old white guy who will hand her an easy win ala Romney.

Forget left vs right. It's freedom vs CONTROL, and the US it's CONTROL we should worry about. Reps/Dems don't care who you vote for as long as it's one of them.

>>4555

Right on. Most folks are libertarian when it comes to their own stuff. Sadly there's way too many thieves and idiots repeating slogans of bad salesmen seeking the head PR position every 4 years.

I say vote for whoever wants to remove bad laws instead of promising to do more of the same.

>>4575

>I say vote for whoever wants to remove bad laws instead of promising to do more of the same.

So, most of the Republican candidates.

>>4584

More of the same = more of the same. Has anyone even mentioned the war on drugs, let alone ending it? Or removing the individual mandate on Obamacare so people aren't punished further just for being broke? Or how Net Neutrality is really all about controlling the internet and limited access to information?

My bet is whoever runs against Hilary will shoot themselves with the same two bullets they always reach for: abortion and gay marriage.

@4557

And I should care why? ALL your president's are assholes! They all fuck with soveriegn nations around the world to get what they want, while invading only the countries that can't fight back like pussies. But as long as the people get their McDick's you could all care less about the suffering caused around the world in your names. Then your whole country acts all indignated when you realize the world hates you.

>>4597

>>>/leftypol/