/phile/ - For those who think young.

How do you plan to go about advertising it? No point in an educational page if no one watching isn't already educated.

Its great that you have a youtube about topic stuff, I wish I was so brave

I'm posting it here, and it's been shared in a couple other places. I'm also trying to be engaged in the comments section of videos related to Minor Attraction. Other than that… luck? I don't know. I'll do collabs too, when I can.

Also, thanks! I wouldn't call myself brave. Just tired of the misinformation.

I do hope we're approaching the next great age of reason and understanding. For the time being I'm so often reminded of those Mr Show bits.

"NAMBLA We're not killers."

"Hi, I'm Bob. I'm a sex offender, and I'm calling today about…..hello?"

New vid is up.

https://youtu.be/bI_xXta21Gc

>>4580

Well I called you brave because you're on the clearnet I guess. I've been wanting too for a long time make media thats pro-pedo but I've always been afraid and still am that in doing so I'd be outed in real life.

It's really hard to find pedophiles on the internet weirdly,as it is here theres only maybe 20 people who go on this board. And while there are plenty on the darkweb most of them dont want to bother with anything but cp. Both groups are really pessimistic too.

>>4596

That was a worry for me too, for a long time. But I'm hopeful about the future, especially if more people start being actively pro-kind.

If I get doxxed, I'll try to play it to my advantage. For example, suing my employer for discrimination.

>>4553

you still here lad? Are ye trying in someway to explain us various "philes" and break down at least some of the Ignorance regarding the attraction and stigma? I

>>4596

all VERY true man.

>>4607

That's pretty much it. Bring up the logical arguments for those willing to hear them.

New video!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0089iG2Dnw

I'm trying to upload every Monday and Friday, my time. But I'll keep updating here.

Another new video guys!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDStMCsiuN0

This one is a little different to the last. I hope you enjoy.

You know, I have embedding enabled, if you want to use that. I'm guessing that you're not using it because embedded videos don't play ads (at least in my experience), though, so if you want to just link them for that reason, that totally makes sense.

You don't even show your face. Coward.

>>4679

Is that really necessary? Most people are scared to even share their voices or even comment positively to show their support.

There should be more advances and unity in the community before people really start showing their faces publicly unless they want to mostly ruin their lives with next to no support. The homosexuals and transgenders look after their own kind but most of the MAP community really lacks this loyalty and bond currently.

At least he's doing -something-. You can't really fault him for not wanting to show his face, I know I wouldn't. Are YOU going to show your face? Do you want to be stalked in real life? What happens when your life is ruined? No one is going to stand out and protest for him and make a voice like if it was a homosexual or racial minority.

Would be nice if people would do stuff like that but I don't see it happening at the moment. The fact is this: most of the MAP community are too fucking cowardly to even make their voice heard or leave their little hug boxes and they have to nerve to sneer and laugh at other people who try just that.

We have a ways to go before we achieve what the gays managed to.

>>4678

I haven't used it because I didn't realise. I'll start embedding from now on.

>>4679

I will if you will. Seriously, though, I will show my face when I am secure enough in my life to do so, and not 1 second earlier.

>>4682

In my experience, there's a huge diversity of opinion, but the main ones are: "What a Jackass, he showed his face. He's FUCKED"; "What a hero, showing his face without fear. We should be there to help"; "Don't show your face, it's dangerous. It's not necessary at this point."; "You don't even show your face. Coward."

I think the last ones aren't really MAPs, but antis looking to ID someone. It's especially likely on a board like this, because of the anonymity.

It won't take too long to rouse support, in my opinion. We just need a little awareness spreading and maybe a legal win. Then we'll come together in support, for the most part.

>>4679

Where is YOUR contribution to the fight, faggot? Put up or shut up.

>>4687

>It won't take too long to rouse support, in my opinion. We just need a little awareness spreading and maybe a legal win. Then we'll come together in support, for the most part.

What we NEED is for someone who fucking lives in the area to interview Jared Fogel. Every day nobody does that is a lost day of us actually getting mainstream attention and having the conversation actually get rolling. This is the only fucking time in years that a celebrity MAP in America has been outed. Fucking use that, Californians!

>>4677

I guess i could also make videos on the topic, but i'm not sure where to begin or i i could commit to it. Also, i'm not sure if you can persuade people when you are talking about how "MAP"s are free nannies or using the term "normie" without the insult connotation or with such a broad definition. I think a better approach would be less "in your face" and more something someone outside it can understand, relate to and maybe agree. I could've been a better idea to show evidence that children can actually think for themselves (something that wouldn't be hard i think) before talking about the implications of a MAP relationship.

By the way, wouldn't it be better if you used the definition:

An individual who views normality as important or as a moral compass and will often discredit something for the solely reason of it being "disgusting"or "weird".

For normie? I don't know if there needs to be a term for a non-MAP since it just means everyone else, and if it does, using "normie" isn't a good idea.

>>4693

I use the term because 1) I don't know any other term to describe non-MAP that is casual, and 2) The slight mockery joins well with the suggestion that to be non-MAP is 'normal'.

The thing about my rants is, they're going to be "in your face", almost by definition. They're cathartic and hopefully entertaining, and I hope they'll make for a nice break between my more scholarly essay videos.

Thanks for the idea about children's ability to think. I'll add it to the list. :)

>>4694

I've actually made a sketch to a video i could make, but i'm pretty shy and not an English speaker. It's not done, i'll probably edit some of what's already done, talking more about the subject and talk about how sex is still viewed as a bad thing (or maybe i could do that in another video). Do you think it's worth it?

http://pastebin.com/rZfqNeDL

>>4694

>>4695

By the way, i'm aware the thing about the heritage in the middle ages is wrong, now that i've researched it more.

>>4688

People in real life know i am a MAP. You will be surprised who supports you. Quit hiding and show your face. To hide makes it seem like we are wrong and evil. It is not like society hasn't accepted us before. Historically speaking. Cowards and fags like you are why we don't have rights even if 1/4 of MAPs came out we would start to make a change. However fags like you hide in fear of what could happen. Stupid bitch like your cunt ass mother raised you to be.

>>4698

>People in real life know i am a MAP. You will be surprised who supports you. Quit hiding

Look at that anecdotal evidence , I guess its safe for everyone to comeout. Regardless of their situation.

I understand there are alot of people who are afraid but coming out isn't going to do much on its own.

>Historically speaking

You know pedophile groups have existed out in open before and have totally failed and at times even taken down by police force even though they weren't touching children. All of them forgotten and having very little if any impact at all on the situation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pedophile_and_pederast_advocacy_organizations

Obviously we'd have to come out eventually but a voice matters more than a face. Making media has way more of an effect than someone just telling people they're a pedophile.

The goal should be to get people talking about pedophilia itself and not the people who are a part of it.

Now, I'm not saying we don't do anything (or even that groups are a bad idea, they really aren't) and I understand why you'd be so mad. It pisses me off to how many people give up and settle for hiding but your everyday man jumping out in everyday life being an open pedophile really really won't help anyone.

>>4695

That's actually pretty good. Depending on your reason for making the video, I think it'll be worth it. Just make sure you back it up, because that topic is probably going to be picked to pieces, when it get's noticed by antis. Maybe check out IPCE.

https://www.ipce.info/

>>4698

Good for you. Not all of us are confident in our family's reactions. I hope your life is as pleasant as you are.

>>4700

This. Exactly This.

>>4695

I liked it.

"Children are as smart as we want them to be" is something that I say and I completely stand by it. Look at other cultures, look at other times in history and see your narrow and small view of a minor crumble.

>>4700

>a voice matters more than a face. Making media has way more of an effect than someone just telling people they're a pedophile. The goal should be to get people talking about pedophilia itself and not the people who are a part of it.

This.

New video!

>>4708

>>4700

Coming out is a start. People need to see us because the media depicts us as evil child molesters. My sister when she first found out didn't talk to me for 4 years. Once she realized I'm still the same person as before and pose no threat to her or her children. Now i am allowed to babysit. All these excuses just show how cowardly you are. I've been threatened but i have concealed carry. Hiding is why people can't tell he difference between us and child molesters. Hiding makes it seem like we are doing something wrong. We can't get allies if we hide. Maybe you guys just don't care or are too cowardly. I am willing to die to change the laws in this country.

>>4721

I'm Australian, if you couldn't tell by my accent. I don't get the option of concealed carry. If I get threatened, I have to defend myself using my own body, or perhaps an improvised weapon. I'm not financially stable enough to risk losing my job. Being smart about coming out isn't the same as being cowardly. I'm not scared to come out, I'm smart enough to to a risk/benefit analysis. Right now, it isn't worth it.

>>4721

Are you pro-contact? Obviously you are, if you weren't you wouldn't be here, but it had to be asked. Sometimes you get virpeds were you least expect them

Besides your immediate family, do your friends or employers know that you're a pedophile?

Would all those people you came out too still be supportive of you if you had a relationship with a child?

Is it really support pedophilia if they are against pro-contact?

Say everyone you told to come out (and who ever those pedophiles told) came out, where do you believe that would go?

Not in a vague sense that it would just eventually lead to acceptance because eventually someone in power would catch on and back us up but instead..

what would be the next thing to happen that couldn't happen if we didn't jump out at this instant?

>inb4 calling everyone a coward instead of explaining why you disagree

>inb4 my family is nice to me so come out fgt

>>4725

>I'm Australian

If I knew how to pray I would be praying for you and every other one of our brothers.

>>4728

It's not so bad……. But I haven't been ID'd yet. Plus, I don't engage in illegal behaviour.

>>4729

Bitch-ass normie.

>>4730

Lol

>>4728

>>4728

Are you pro-contact? Obviously you are, if you weren't you wouldn't be here, but it had to be asked. Sometimes you get virpeds were you least expect them

Yes of course but with certain limits.

Besides your immediate family, do your friends or employers know that you're a pedophile?

I only have 2 friends lol but they know. Currently I am in college full time on scholarship so no job.

Would all those people you came out too still be supportive of you if you had a relationship with a child?

This is too general. It would depend on so many factors (age, if sex was on the table the parents awareness, who the child is, etc) I think that laws would have to change, too. However I do think people trust me to do the right thing in a relationship so I guess yes.

Is it really support pedophilia if they are against pro-contact?

No. You cannot say you are fine with a sexuality but say that they cannot act on it. Sexuality is more than thoughts and feelings. hell the word sex is in there! I say you can't support a sexuality if you do not support the sex!

Say everyone you told to come out (and who ever those pedophiles told) came out, where do you believe that would go?

People will see that "good people" are MAPs. Right now the media only shows the "bad MAPs" thus of course people will think we are all bad if they cannot name a single good MAP. If we come out people will see that the people they love, trust, care for… are MAPs. When we come out it will force people to start to consume the fact that we are not evil but like any other group. Each group has the good and the bad. We only have the bad representing us. We are a minority group thus we have to work harder to improve our image. Take one of my friends. He is Black. So I explained to him this way about MAPs

"When people only see Black men ans dumb thugs what happened? If people see positive images of Black men that are good people and productive members of society then what? You are a Black man who is an honor student in college, never been a thug and not even unto rap music. People see you and they see that Black men should not be seen as the same" I also explain that sexuality unlike race can be hidden thus we are given the choice to hide. However I believe we should no longer hide. Are their people who hate Blacks still sure but the good images and the people who are clearly Black can help reduce the believe Blacks are evil thugs.

Not in a vague sense that it would just eventually lead to acceptance because eventually someone in power would catch on and back us up but instead..

what would be the next thing to happen that couldn't happen if we didn't jump out at this instant?

Nothing. Actually I think our image becomes worse as we sit back. Most people think pedo = child molester who kills. People celebrate our deaths. I know calling people cowards is harsh but we cannot hide if we want major changes. I think we need to stop comparing ourselves to gays, Imho i perfer to actually compare myself to racial minority like Blacks. That was the best way I could get him to understand and accept me. He understood. However unlike Blacks we can hide which is our biggest flaw. Blacks are easy to spot so they had no choice to rally up change. I actually think by making ourselves visible we can incite change.

>>4737

You're right, in a way. If we all did come out, we'd make major changes. But that will not happen, because in the interim, people will be hurt, isolated, ridiculed, or even killed. Change takes time. Social attitudes are hard to change with a directed effort. We don't need in-fighting as well.

What would be better, is teaching MAPs how to prepare themselves to come out. Explain what's necessary, like passive income independent of employment, and some savings. Maybe some self-defense knowledge. That sort of thing. Calling people cowards only works if cowardice is shameful. Staying in the *closet* isn't shameful, so it'll be a long while before the toybox becomes a shameful place to hide, if it ever does.

>>4739

I don't know if I've told you this, but I was outed by a small group of assholes, and nothing happened. Granted, the knowledge basically stayed within two contained groups, one kinda big, one kinda small, but it's not the catastrophe you make it out to be. All it cost me was some fake friends. All my real friends, good friends, bad friends, and friends in the middle, still talk to me. This is an old story, of course, but it's also a continuing saga with occasional developments. In the past month, I've seen in person a whopping two people from the big group. I wasn't treated any differently by them. I've seen two others previously as well, and they didn't treat me any differently. One of them asked me about what had happened, and I truthfully denied the false allegations, so I guess he, and possibly some or all of the others, may not have the full story. Well, no, at the very least, the friends in these groups closest to me know the full story. I should stop talking about this and go back to drowning my sorrows in Project Mirai DX.

>>4754

You hadn't told me this, and it's very interesting. Were you employed? Being outed by a group that keeps it quiet is a little different to coming out proud. However, you do bring up a good point. It's HIGHLY unlikely anything too bad will happen. Given time, it's likely that true friends and family members will accept you, vigilantes are a rare phenomenon, and you don't have to let your employer know. If they find out and fire you for it, it's wrongful termination, however, if you on't want to bring a judge into it, you can always get another job (technically. It still may be difficult, like with everyone else).

I will no longer harp on about how bad it could be, without at least pointing out it likely won't be that bad.

>>4756

This is more pedos came out people would have to accept that there are good pedos and the bad are not the majority. Remember when saying something was gay was big? Now you get called out for it and called homophobic. The same can happen with pedophiles.

Coming out is a powerful thing. Remember you are protected under the law. I also think pedos should come together and support (like the blacks do) if the law doesn't do it justice (like a pedophile was beaten badly but no files charged).

New Video!

>>4817

I agree. It is a good idea, but I don't think our community is that united, yet. Also, while encouraging people to come out is good, it should be tempered with common sense. For example, do not come out if you currently rely on someone to survive, such as financially. There isn't a strong enough support network to help young MAPs that get kicked out of their home by judgmental parents.

As for being protected under the law, not really. Until we can either change the DSM, or win a few cases, termination for minor attraction is not illegal, because it's seen as a mental illness, not an orientation. It's worth contesting in court, but the precedent has yet to be set.

>>4818

Sorry for not being specific about protection under the law. What I meant is you are human with rights. This it is illegal to threaten, attack or kill MAP.

>>4826

That is true. But just because it's illegal doesn't mean it'll be enforced. LEO's are people too, and usually anti, so you might not have much help from that front. It's unlikely anything bad will happen, in that vein at least, but there's no harm in being prepared for it.

New video!

I'm looking for a video or article to dissect on my channel. If you have any suggestions, could you send me an link?

>>4884

What kind of video/article are you lokking for?

>>4838

Nigga, you had better have ultimately discredited and denounced power dynamic bullshit as a whole, because it's 100% SJW horse shit. Want proof? Listen to this episode of The Biggest Problem in the Universe. http://thebiggestproblemintheuniverse.com/episode-78/

>>4884

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/a-dark-web-hacker-is-hunting-potential-pedophiles-to-extort-them-for-money

*sigh* how this is seen as a good and valiant thing is beyond me

>>4889

Anything filled with arguments against Minor attraction, or anything that I can show to be wrong. I'd prefer a challenge, but we're dealing with anti's here, so I doubt I'll find anything like that.

>>4891

No, I didn't. I may have been using a different definition of power dynamics than feminists, though. I can't get through much feminist 'research' before I have to stop and seethe for a while.

>>4893

A brief perusal suggests this could be good. It's less about minor attraction, though. The issues are mostly with security and invasion of privacy.

>>4893

I keep hearing about agents hacktivists posing as 13-16yo girls to catch guys who wanna chat, like an Operation Shooting Fish in a Barrel.

This must mean if we like girls under 9 we're safer?

>>4903

I keep hearing about agents posing in the older bracket of "pedophilia" and i guess that's a part of the reason it bothers me. It's one thing to want to entrap people that want to have sex with 7 yos…(that's still fucked for them to do) but wanting to entrap people that want to have sex with 13-16yos? that's in a way almost more fucked.

i guess it bothers me because hebe and ephebe range attraction is essentially vilified the same as nepi range attraction is which is odd. (there are distinctions of paraphilias for a reason and i'm not making any statements about any of them i guess i'm just growing tired of this whole "internet crusader" thing.)

at the same time though, i do have qualms about the people that get entrapped in these scenarios. depending on their intentions and the kind of people they are, i can empathize with them.

but as a whole, it's pretty scummy to entrap people that want to hook up with a 15 yo.

>>4553

Check out antipedophobe aktion on twitter

>>4904

>>4907

Check out Chris Hansen's interviews on O&A. His responses sum up the intentions of LE perfectly. They could target the few real predators out looking for girls and boys under 10, but instead they hire college girls who look young enough to pretend to be 14-16 out of convenience. Then they catch first-timers who barely know how the net works and no history of deviance. When caught they fall to pieces and beg for mercy. Wouldn't a real psycho insist they did nothing wrong, and have priors?

Maybe I just think too much. But we'd all be a lot better off if LE and activists differentiated between acts of force and harmless fun where all parties involved consented.

New video!

>>4911

I'll be sure to check that out as soon as I figure out screen capturing.

>>4904

Do 7 year olds try meeting people online? I think LEA doesn't believe that it is possible thus feels it is a waste of time.

They go after these men because it is illegal. If you break laws they can prosecute you.

This is why more MAA should become lawyers. And maybe even a judge.

>>4938

I agree, although I doubt the world would be a better place with even more lawyers. The fact that we have so many already proves that we have too many bad laws clogging up the works.

But I doubt they'll let any of us sit on the bench. You've gotta know some handshakes, and if you let too many deviants go (even harmless ones) you'll be asked to step down. It's happened before.

As for the whole Catch a Predator thing, my point was that by looking for normal guys who like teens and would accept an invitation if given one they're wasting their time and our money because they're going after practically ALL straight men and treating us all like Jack the Ripper.

Again, all the more reason to stay informed so when you vote it's not against your best interests, and possibly for the benefit of everyone in general.

>>4958

No offense but if you followed civil rights in this countries the disadvantaged groups had lawyers. We need lawyers.

Well not all men want or prefer teens. That is an assumptions that hurts our cause. Rather focus on those who want teens and humanize them.

>>4961

Every man is attracted to teens, though.

>>4963

Actually your statement should be:

Everyone male or female are attracted to teens.

However not all men are primarily or/and exclusively attracted to teens. Speak for yourself. This is why the movement doesn't get much progress. It would be like gays saying "everybody is a little gay". Don't tell others how they feel.

Personally teenagers might be attractive but honestly they aren't as good to me a women. I would pick a woman 25-49 over a teen any day. Complete maturity is sexy. I spend time around teens (work in a high school) and they aren't that great.

I understand initial attraction but once they talk game over. Lol.

>>4963

This "all men are" mantra is just a way to mask insecurities. One thinks that claiming all men are x makes them feel more normalized.

Not only that but the "all men" craps tends to ignore women and girls. They have a right to choose. Most actually want to date a man/boy close in age. If you are 20+ or even 30+ getting a teen is unlikely. The ones with issues tend to go for older men. Working at a high school most girls rather show interest in boys their age. Some kids even think a freshman dating a senior is a big deal.

>>4965

Peak normie here.

>>4974

Duh I'm trying to be an ally. Are you guys that exclusive that you don't want allies? Well, lol, don't compare your movement to the gays because they were much smarter about shit like this. Damn shame too. Just was going to test this shit out with a buddy.

There's a lot of stuff I missed, and don't know how to respond.

"All men are" is already false. There are too many variables to humans to say definitively that all men are anything. Hell, not even all men are men, depending on your definition of man. Stop making such broad and stupid assumptions. There may be evidence of evolutionary preference for youth, but that doesn't make EVERY man a hebe. Just stop.

On the topic of civil rights, I feel it should be pointed out that if we jump on the collectivist bandwagon now, we'll go down with it when it inevitably crashes. I think we need individuals to take a stand, to cry out and be heard. Lawyers will come for money or prestige, or both, so if you want to get some on our side, we need people to make this issue a talking point. Which can only happen if we show support for those who choose to risk themselves. I'm not saying we as a collective. I'm trying to convince you as individuals.

What was done in the past can be adapted to the present and applied in the future, but I haven't studied the various civil rights movements for ideas. I'm open to suggestions.

>>4983

I'm happy to see you here as an ally. Please don't pay too much mind to the jaded MAPs. There're plenty of people thrilled to find rational normies, willing to at least hear us out.

I would point out that gays seem smarter because we don't have record of all their conversations ever. There was probably a lot of stupid anti-straight crap said behind closed doors, but it didn't see the light of day because it wasn't online or written down. The stuff that was seen by history would be equivalent to Todd's article and interviews. And Tom O'Carrol's blog, interviews, and books. The stuff on these forums isn't the movement itself. Just the conversations in a safe space for us to vent our frustrations. It shouldn't be taken seriously.

>>4993

Thank you for understanding! My thing is I'm trying to bridge the gap between MAP and non MAP. It seems like everyone here is MAP thus everyone tends to agree with everyone. I'm here as an ambassador of "normies". I might come off as imposing but I just want to help "edit" (like one would a paper) your message so it can be received well. I also want to give you all tips so you could reconsider your ideas.

When MAPs claim all men are x it just destructive. It will cause a knee jerk reaction and immediately piss people off. Focus in I statements or we statements regarding MAPs. You want strong arguments that people can support. Not generalizations about men that only make you seem foolish. I also have reservations about using the evolution arguments.

I do agree that gays did have their stupid shit. I even heard the first gays in the movement were against flamboyant gays. Oh how they must be spinning in their graves now!

Another suggestion. Of Male and Female MAPs came together I bet more people would support. I know you don't like feminists here but I was talking to one the other day about adult child sex and she had the double standard of (adult woman with boy is okay the reverse no). So I told her it is sexist and wrong not to support both. Plus you don't see girls as being asexual and believe they have right to take charge etc. Now I am rambling but she basically is started to like the idea of teens with adults. Perhaps more feministss would join to.

Just some thoughts….

>>4997

I toss around the idea in my head a lot about convincing leftards and SJWs. Something kind of encouraging happened over the weekend. I was hanging out with my high school aged chick friends (sorry, fellow ephebo fans, they're not hotties, unfortunately), and because I don't reveal my age to anyone, since some of them "ship" me with one of them, the topic of "how much of an age difference matters" sorta came up, and for the girl, who's seventeen or eighteen, maybe even sixteen about to be seventeen, they said "no older than 25," and to me, that's a decent level of acceptance. I went on to say that I don't think it matters if it's less than fifteen years. (And I don't think it matters past that too much, either, but fifteen years is where an issue of one dying a good while before the other could become an issue.) And nobody objected. So, small win. This may or may not be related to liberal/feminist/SJW tendencies. I don't know if any of these girls have those, but I do suspect that none of them are as socially conservative as myself.

>>4997

>I just want to help "edit" (like one would a paper) your message so it can be received well

I'd be happy if it were received at all, to be honest. While I think it is important to properly prepare our arguments so they're eloquent, that will only be useful when we successfully get people talking. To get people talking, we need to be loud, I think.

>When MAPs claim all men are x it just destructive. It will cause a knee jerk reaction and immediately piss people off. Focus in I statements or we statements regarding MAPs.

Agreed.

> I also have reservations about using the evolution arguments.

What reservations? It seems like a good argument to me, especially from someone who is impassioned and informed.

>Of Male and Female MAPs came together I bet more people would support

This would be great, if we could. In most communities, MAPs are very accepting of other genders. It's places like this that breed segregation, because of the concept of "no girls on the internet", which can work for logical arguments, but not for social movements. If you have any ideas on how to bring them here, I'm all ears.

>Perhaps more feministss would join to.

No. Feminists either take over movements and use them to their own ends, or they destroy them leaving a husk in their wake. For example, look at the current state of New Atheism. No one cares anymore. Or the adopted fight for black rights, which used to have good goals and message, but now is just college aged whiners bitching because they're too thin skinned.

I won't mind if feminists start using our arguments, but I won't allow them to speak for me. That's my opinion, and I don't think it will change soon. Especially without a reasoned argument and some evidence.

>>5003

Be thankful that most girls don't get remotely political until they're brainwashed in college. On age differences, I've known 11-14yo girls who thought I was 17 and were noticeably upset when they learned I was over 20. Not that anything would've happened, but the fact that they were interested in an older guy says plenty. If two friends truly love each other and enjoy being together, age is about as irrelevant as political affiliation. That said, I'd love to have a lgf, even if she was a communist.

>>5061

Political brainwashing happens starting in preschool. Look at all this trans-bullshit acceptance. Do you realize how much of that is the result of the media deciding to push that horse shit as normal? Also, political affiliation is hardly "irrelevant." Clearly you're not very interested in politics. Also, why the fuck would you reveal your age? PROTIP: Keeping it a secret makes them wet as a Slip 'N' Slide.

>>5068

>Political brainwashing happens starting in preschool.

For starters, the pledge of allegiance. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

oh, indoctrination… :/

>>5069

Not sure if THAT particular example is one that I would count.

>>5069

If you have or know kids please encourage them and their classmates to add Doug Stanhope's addendum. Sure to freak their teachers the F out.

"…with liberty and justice for all….Must be 18, void where prohibited, some restrictions may apply, not available in all states."

>>5068

I think rape is a more appropriate description of what happens in school. Adults know kids are easily impressionable and stuff as much BS into their heads while they can. Thankfully those spaces often get filled in with video games and other things that are far more interesting to children than politics.

On party affiliation I only mean to say that major parties really don't care who you vote for as long as it's for one of them. I'm 100% for a total clean sweep, get rid of anyone who's held any office for more than two terms. They can't be trusted, and even if they can they'll understand why they've gotta go, to be sure the disease is flushed out entirely. Then we can look at new blood who not only get the internet but know that it's not their place to try and give people "free" shit (which is actually most expensive).

On that girl I opened up to, it was only cuz she asked, but in the end she and her sister and their friends still liked me regardless. If you've got a car and a job girls will flock to you whether you're 20 or 30. They even get off on knowing they're bagging guys who pay more attention to them than their mothers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_LUJlNbHHo

>>5369

Should i make a video reply to this video, he seems to have a really twisted vision of what pedophilia is.

>>5369

>>5370

>>5370

>>5369

I agree, many misconceptions repeated in this vid by another concerned but confused parent.

How exactly do you get convicted of pedophilia?

How does he know ex-cons who've shanked pedos in prison?

He cites Catch a Predator as his source, which is about morons who like teens, not pedos.

Too much rambling to keep up with or comment on.

>>5370

Do it. You'll be making a difference.

Is the rollover even happening? Whatever.

I have a new video up, with another one going up later today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DeFgjpzGWM

>>5379

It's basically delayed indefinitely. Fuck you, Josh Moon. You don't deserve to have Moon in your name. You should have it blasted out by Moon Man, who plays piano with his hands. Moon Man, who kills the faggots in this land, who saves meeeeee…

New Video is up! It tackles the very heart of our plight… Whether or not it's wrong to be attracted to minors.

Check it out!

https://youtu.be/8HqXuOv3itM

New Video up. This time I intellectually dissect a blog post by the Virped co-founder Ethan Edwards.

>>5427

God fucking damn, I hate that bastard.

Can someone please direct me to the Audiophiles podcast? What ep are they on? I dl the pilot ep but havent had the time til yesterday.

>>5438

Ignore >>5442 and don't give him any further undeserved, unearned views.

Here is what actually happened.

I had created the Audio/phile/'s podcast, and we had brought on a third host who seemed to be working out okay, but then additional people were brought on without my approval and basically handed the same level of creative control as everyone else. In reality, creative control should have been mostly mine, and I should have had the final say on all matters as the executive producer, but I didn't catch the mutiny early enough, and by the time I relived what was going on, it was too late. Stanza, who needs to STOP BEING AN AVATARFAG, BY THE WAY, basically cucked me out of my show. We had a third episode recorded that was fine, but because people disagreed with my opinions, they insisted on re-recording it. I made the colossal mistake of ultimately reluctantly agreeing, but then they wouldn't even allow me to make note of it for the audience for the sake of transparency. They also wanted to basically censor me. It also turns out that they're all fucking leftards. Big fucking surprise, right? (Tex is actually more of a centrist, but he also was for the censorship.)

These fucks went on to take the EXACT SOME SHOW, re-record it without me in it, effectively replicating the same thing but with my opinions stripped out, which is plagiarism, by the way, without crediting me in the slightest. And then they go and gloss over the truth with bullshit like that YouTube video.

The reality is that there has been no proper restitution for the IP theft, and they broke their agreements to help me work on Audio/phile/s and are continuing to focus only on shitposting, treating me like shit, and making their terrible sterilized PC content which would never have come into being without me, all while not acknowledging this.

Since no one would honor their agreement to help me produce the show you all actually enjoyed, it's in Development Hell while they crank out bullshit "Juice Box" content.

If you or anyone else would like to help me restore the actually good, not politically correct, not overly serious, not censored, and not left-wing Audio/phile/s program, I'd be happy to have you contribute in any way you can. Even if it's just telling the Juice Box fags to go suck a cock.

>>5449

>>5449

Woah, sounds like a small cluster fuck.

Alright ill ask again since i only just learned about this, where is the audiophiles podcast #2 i downloaded the pilot episode but i dont know where to find the seccond one. If i am correct this is the ep in which the 3rd person was added? And before the name change to Juice Box?

Or am i too out of the loop.

>>5442

Yo stanza what about the audiophiles ep2? Or was that the 1st jukebox ep?

Nigga ive been out for months im out of the loop. Plzo amigo.

>>5463

>>5464

Where were you during that time?

Here, the second episode: >>3719

I was in an elevated state as they started this recording, so I had them go on without me, which turned out to be a mistake. I don't like how it turned out at all, but it's not as shitty as their new show.

Incidentally, I'm going to have to listen to both of their shitty episodes now because they've not given any restitution whatsoever for their transgressions with it, so I'll have to note EVERYTHING they did that was out of bounds. Once those negotiations are complete, I'll bring back the original, actually good show. OP may possibly be the only other co-host, however, and though a third wheel would be nice, it's not necessary.

On an unrelated, but important note, vote Republican, even if it's Trump.

>>5465

>>5465

>>5465

Thanks.

Also thanks but no thanks /pol/

Latest video is up. This time, I talk about EVOLUTION! Enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u39asCBnb7I

>>4578

Ive seen it and posting here is a way of passing relevant info

Im not OP

But its a good tube with a real voice and well done

Oh unrelated but this is from a movie

Its legal but its cute too

8:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDkDxrgaD_Wp_oIYgM_eDcKQvebKXtXy_

Here's a quick update, guys.

https://youtu.be/6lsHgKdoTiA