[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/phile/ - For those who think young.

Show some <18 love.

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


The word filter experiment didn't really work because you can't have filters apply exactly. But please don't use "pedo" or "pedos," as these are slurs used by normies and self haters.

File: 1447258845253.jpg (11.55 KB, 169x255, 169:255, 1441131699275-0.jpg)

a46fe7 No.4746

Proposed Relational Maturity and Sexual Competency (RMSC) testing schema:

In order to be declared mentally competent to engage in consensual sexual activities (rather than having had a certain number of birthdays) under the proposed system, the test-taker proves his/her mental competence by passing a test. 

a46fe7 No.4747


fc7d0f No.4751

Wow this is very interesting. I like it.


58243f No.4753

Reminds me of a Stanhope bit, "If I can pass my driving test blowing a 1.6 (blood alcohol level), I should get a license saying that I'm OK to drive up to 1.6."

All it would take is one 1st grader to pass a RMSC with a perfect score and everyone would freak out. Most likely they'd propose having to get a license to have any kinda sex, and who wants that?


58243f No.4771

Correction: .16 blood alcohol level.

1.6 would mean you and your twin have turned into vodka.


2e1408 No.4772

>>4771

Yeah, lel, if your blood alcohol content is 1.6, cops are the least of your worries.


58243f No.4781

>>4772

And I've seen teens in drunk goggles pass their driving test.

What'll happen if girls K-5th ace these RMSC tests?


5f23af No.4783

>>4781

>What'll happen if girls K-5th ace these RMSC tests?

They'd be deemed competent to engage in sexual activity. The only limitations would be based on physical capability.


58243f No.4803

>>4783

Who gets to determine physical capability? I've read at least one medical text suggesting that a girl's vagina is usually capable of accommodating a penis the size of her father's by the age of 9. However there are also still morons who believe no girl is ready for sex until 18, or 21, and ONLY after marriage. And they don't just mean what's morally right, they're talking about what's physically possible. Clearly they haven't seen certain vids which are probably best left unnamed…


b4d289 No.4806

>>4803

>Who gets to determine physical capability?

Ideally it would be the responsibility of the persons involved in the sexual activity. If they try something and it's too painful or will damage the girl/boy, they should not proceed with that particular act.

I know that's asking a lot for some people, but there's really no other way except trying and figuring it out, unless it could somehow be medically verified that the girl/boy could handle it.


58243f No.4808

>>4806

Exactly. If only people were willing to take responsibility in their own lives, and allow their kids to do the same.

As for verification it'd always have to be a case by case basis. But if you've seen Lexington Steele with Leanni Lei or Mandingo with Kitty Katzu and adjust for scale it's clear there's plenty a normal-size guy could do with even a petite girl…assuming they were up for such things.

There's something else I wish lawmakers would consider: how many girls seek much older partners, honestly?


2b657e No.4814

>>4808

A girl's vagina can handle a lot more than most people think. It's all in how you go about it. You can't just shove it in and expect everything to work out for the best. Even adult women that are still virgins find it painful and risk damage if their partner just plunges in balls deep the first time.


6aacf2 No.4815

>>4803

One medical test? Wrong lol. It really depends on the anatomy of the female (the length between her vaginal opening and her cervix) and the lehth of the penis. That is not that hard to find out.

Plus why not give girls dildos and let them see what they can handle before putting a real penis on their.


d20e6c No.4831

>>4781

Isn't that the point? If they pass they understand sex and thus know what they can or cannot handle.


58243f No.4850

>>4814

>>4815

>>4831

All the more reason to push for new laws that view people as individuals on a case by case basis. For now it helps that so many girls are doing stuff on their own cams. The more they play and experiment (possibly with friends) we'll see if anybody dares to go after any of them for doing what kids have always done in private.

That may be the big breaking point, if the next stars all post their own stuff and everyone's too shocked to do anything about it.


ac52dd No.4853

>>4850

The problem with cams is either single or with others of the same age. Additionally people don't like the children film themselves.

However I like the case by case basis. A test like this can allow something like that .


58243f No.4868

>>4853

Who will dare to be the next Kinsey? There's already more than enough evidence running contrary to the common universal misconceptions, it just has to be compiled. Until then I'm sure kids with cams will continue to outdo each other and redraw the lines on who can get away with what.


fe73b0 No.4887

>>4868

Hopefully kids filming themselves will change the laws.


58243f No.4899

>>4887

It kinda already has, or at least the way some laws are (not) enforced. If they tried to investigate every felony committed by girls with webcams they wouldn't have time for anything else, like food and sleep.


6aacf2 No.4909

>>4899

They try. They are more concerned with distribution or if an adult has them. Kids usually don't get in trouble it's the adults. It still illegal as an adult to have the pictures and videos of underage girls even if the girls filmed it and gave it to you.


be1976 No.4937

The problem with good ideas like this is no one publicly supports and endorses it .


58243f No.4959

>>4937

Right on. We need MAPs in Congress.


d93aa6 No.4985

>>4959

They would have to be openly MAP though. I'm sure they exist now just in the closet.


82bb67 No.5002

>>4985

Confirmed, actually. I believe at least one of those closet homo Congressmen who got outed was perving on 15yo boys.


fc70dd No.5016

>>5002

Well that is interesting. I wonder how the boy feels. He should be allowed to speak about his experiences. I remember reading that a gay activist wanted to lower the age of consent to 13/14 but I think he was push towards NAMBLA.


3b3bf5 No.5036

>>4808

>>how many girls seek much older partners, honestly?

Girls tend to like boys in their age range. Additionally like men girls tend to be attracted to youth. Most girls would pick a 20 something man over 40+.


58243f No.5060

>>5002

>>5016

I should've been specific. The last thing we need are more pervs in Congress, and trying to justify buggering boys is the opposite of what we want. Thankfully NAMBLA has essentially gone the way of the KKK, voiceless and powerless. What I meant was we need MAP-friendly people who will shred a ton of really bad laws that don't protect anyone.

>>5036

And don't forget that wave of female teachers banging their male students, some of whom ended up getting married. May we live to see a time when love is all about mutual happiness and age is largely insignificant.


7fea86 No.5977

>>4746

sauce for pic related?


000000 No.6014

We don't let kids buy guns, drink, drive and buy cigarettes for a reason.

Kids often make bad choices. You can't just "let them be responsible for their own actions".

Mentally disabled persons are often evaluated for competence and capacity and these assessments often guide what they are permitted to do. Even in regards to relationships and sex.

This is similar. Children obviously vary greatly and are at different stages of maturity. A method of evaluation is long past time. I'd expect such a thing to be more of an exception to the rule than the rule itself. An exemption, if you will.

ie: Child wants to be sexually active, maybe parents agree, or not.. so the child applies for a mental competency evaluation. It is very likely there would be a 30 day re-evaluation.

Just letting kids make their own choices is a resoundingly bad idea, particularly in an age where they can just vanish without a trace with ease.

By rule of thumb, most of them do not have full control of their faculties and this has a negative effect on decision making ability.

They do require protection, unfortunately this has not been revised in a very long time and may well be doing as much harm as good.

Children have rights, but they also have the need to be protected from their own bad decisions.


8fcb94 No.6037

>>5036

>Additionally like men girls tend to be attracted to youth.

but females generally marry to older partners




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]