/phile/ - For those who think young.

https://www.springer.com/about+springer/media/springer+select?SGWID=0-11001-6-1042321-0

People will remain skeptical until actual people come forward. Nobody cares about anonymous pro-pedo stories. For one they aren't reliable. One could make up a story. Plus people who were sexually abused do come forward showing their face.

We need people to come forward showing their face and giving support to adult-child relationships.

>>5000

Well stories was only 1/4 of what I asked for and this isn't for winning the world over just to be able to hold your own when the time comes. Don't be so pessimistic, who said they had to be anonymous?

Like this one which isn't anonymous

https://web.archive.org/web/20080222172220/http://www.paedosexualitaet.de/exp/Johnny.html

I swear I've run into you a few times over on here and I think even /younglove with the same thing about coming out, regardless of what if the thread has anything to do with it.

Lets try to keep things relevant, people giving links and sources to help us isn't going to stop anyone from comming out.

https://www.ipce.info/

>>5011

This.

And these:

https://consentinghumans.wordpress.com/

https://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/

http://www.sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/GUS/GUS_MAIN_INDEX.HTM

>>5010

>>Well stories was only 1/4 of what I asked for and this isn't for winning the world over just to be able to hold your own when the time comes.

Okay. So you want evidence for an argument? Fine. I'm just explaining what I have seen. People will wonder: most people who "had sex" as a child are dealing with serious issues. Why haven't they heard of someone who had sex as a child with an adult before and didn't call it abuse? Some people who were raped and molested will come forward claiming you are "making this up". The issue is the face of child sex is abused children. So when you argue with those who probably wish death upon you, anonymous sources and obscure scientific research will not win them over. If you said you just wanted the information then I could see why you take offense to my comment. However you plan on using this information to argue with others that are "normies" correct? If not I apologize. If you are then I'm just telling you how they will react. I've seen arguments like this play out. I've been looking this up and read forums, debate websites, comments on articles, etc.

>>Don't be so pessimistic, who said they had to be anonymous?

You aren't being realistic. Unless you are arguing to other MAPs and not to normies then you clearly don't understand the audience.

>>I swear I've run into you a few times over on here and I think even /younglove with the same thing about coming out, regardless of what if the thread has anything to do with it.

What? Part of the problem with an anonymous board is you really can't tell. My main point is on those who had sex with children coming forward. That actually would be better than MAA coming out.

>>Lets try to keep things relevant, people giving links and sources to help us isn't going to stop anyone from comming out.

What? This confused me? How would links and sources have to do with stopping anyone from coming out. I'm going to check out young love to see what the fuss is about.

It is not relevant to explain how normies will react to what you plan to use as an argument? My bad I guess I shouldn't try to explain how so far none of these arguments have even nudged them in the right direction.

Carry on. The cycle repeats.

Thanks and welcome to all of you who have been visiting my blog. I feel flattered to have my blog included by Mitch alongside Tom's august HereticTOC and the monumental 'Growing Up Sexually' Corpus.

Just a pointer - if you're looking on my blog for a kind of summary of pro-paedophile arguments - you're probably best heading to -

https://consentinghumans.wordpress.com/2015/08/14/18-common-misconceptions-about-paedophiles-paedophilia/

Do you mind if I mention 8ch.net/phile in my (I think) next post?

I know some websites prefer to remain obscure (not that a mention on my blog will project you into any super-league of web-sitess).

Just thought I'd check with you first.

regards

Leonard

>>5028

This is a chan board, you may get a few answers from different people which are contradictory.

I say do it. We'll live through the traffic received, even if it's a torrential amount, and it might lead to more activity, which is sadly lacking here.

>>5028

Go for it for sure. We need a no-anti place like this to get big.