I just discovered the method of proving consent among children, or at least that such capability exists at even its most fundamental level. This would also be very easy to demonstrate.
1. take normie under
2. progress to the point where they snap out of it.
3. tell them why they snapped out of it, and confirm that they indeed did not want that specific interaction, and this is why they snapped out of it.
4. repeat with minor [with whatever supervision and parental consent you need for this study]
now this will yield 2 possible results
100% of monors did not in fact snap out of it, and they are in fact actually not capable of recognizing discontent.
or
even if more than 0% do snap out of it, and do confirm that what brought them to was in fact unwanted, then you will confirm that minors are capable of at least recognizing they don't want something.
now in the most likely situation [the second] this creates a HUGE hole in the anti rhetoric and poses a whole new question to the neutrals.
why are we not teaching minors to voice discontent as it occurs instead of forcing them never to experiencing it?
of course such a study would never get approved openly, and if it were conducted behind closed doors, publishing the results would be suicide.
credits to
>>5709