Here's some compelling evidence that, far from being paraphilias, sexual preferences for adolescents are the norm for men.* Search statistics show that girls about 14 are the most searched for: http://img.ie/images/rurgy.jpg* An internet survey was

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 01:15:24 0b4448 No.6

Here's some compelling evidence that, far from being paraphilias, sexual preferences for adolescents are the norm for men.

* Search statistics show that girls about 14 are the most searched for: http://img.ie/images/rurgy.jpg

* An internet survey was carried out as part of the documentary "Are All Men Pedophiles?" in which men were shown pictures of females without being informed of their age and asked if they found them sexually desirable or not. Girls about 14 got the highest ratings: http://img.ie/images/5r6zq.png

* In this study men rated female faces about 13 years old the most attractive. Other studies show similar results: http://www.epjournal.net/articles/facial-olfactory-and-vocal-cues-to-female-reproductive-value/

* "Catch a Predator" type shows usually use girls about 14 as bait because that's what draws the most men.

* The fact that the most popular age for porn actresses is the minimum legal age (18) strongly suggests that what the market wants is girls under that age. If there were no legal restrictions the most popular age for girls in the porn industry would be likely to be a few years younger.

* The vulvas that get posted in “Post up the best looking pussies” threads on porn sites always look like they belong to girls about 12 or 14. They are nice and neat with little or no pubic hair and have a virginal, slightly immature look about them. (A vulva that’s tight and fresh looking is a sign that the girl it belongs to hasn’t started reproducing yet and still has all of her fertile years ahead of her.)

* All of this is in very close agreement with what biology predicts about male preferences (watch "Tears In The Amazon" to see what I mean about breast pertness): http://img.ie/images/uo3hq.png

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 03:29:26 62cabb No.7

File: 1411615766706.jpg (34.01 KB, 624x468, 4:3, half_shirt-624x468.jpg)

So why is it so "wrong" to be with a 14 15 year old. I assume learned folk know these stats as well, so why are people going to jail for this? I knew I wasn't sick or a terrible human for finding teens attractive. I'm a normal every day person.

This is how the gays felt before it was okay to be a fag. Someday brothers…someday.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 03:36:15 81feb2 No.8

File: 1411616175800.jpg (187.16 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, image.jpg)

Interesting read thank you

Mod V 09/25/14 (Thu) 03:45:34 9e2b5f No.9

I find this interesting I'm going to go ahead and Sticky this =)

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 04:28:56 05e0b7 No.15

Well, for whatever reason, the law and "normal" society expects our preferences to change when we hit the magical age of 18.

The old saying is true:
No matter how old you get, they stay the same age.

When you're 12, you're captivated by 16 year old girls.

When you're 16, you like 16 year old girls.

When you're 21, you like 16 year old girls.

When you're 30, you like 16 year old girls.

When you're 50, you like 16 year old girls.

When you're 104, you like 16 year old girls.

It's not as if older women become more physically attractive to you as you get older. Your brain, eyes and dick stay consistent in their preferences no matter what your age. But some people think they know better than biology, and they tell you you're wrong

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 06:06:46 56ad9d No.69

It makes enough sense when you think about it. For cavemen and early civilizations, you lived to thirty, forty tops. You didn't wait till you had five years left in your expectancy to have a kid. So teenagers were the ones reproducing. But teenagers were also just as much adults as anyone else. These days, teens are treated like and have the mentality of children, which leaves them unfit to breed with. So yeah, the biology never changed, society did

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 08:37:38 6e5a99 No.79

I don't blame people for being attracted to girls that young. I agree that it's mostly just human nature.

But we're not cavemen anymore, we now know a significant more about how our brains work and develop with age.

Even 18 year olds still have another 5 or 6 years before their brains finish developing fully.

So I guess my argument to the whole "why can't I have sex with young girls" is that they aren't mentally mature enough to comprehend what they're doing. That's not to say they don't want to do it, I'm sure plenty of 13 year old girls would be fine with it, but I'm also sure plenty of 13 year old girls would have a field day with my credit card, and dress like complete idiots if given the choice. The line is pretty blurry when trying to judge when someone becomes mentally mature to make simple decisions like that, but 18 makes sense since it's right after they've finished high school and now are moving out into the real world.

In conclusion, look at whatever pictures or videos of girls as you want, but trying to advocate for the right to have legal sex with them is pretty fucked up.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 09:49:04 0b4448 No.80

File: 1411638544671.jpg (101.83 KB, 768x576, 4:3, val.jpg)

Definitely agree that adolescent girls have the most attractive faces. The closest thing to the perfect female face I've ever seen is 13 year old Jaroslava Schallerová from "Valerie and Her Week of Wonders".

Great film btw. She kisses some older women and gets naked.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 14:21:36 0e8218 No.86

I think men would be a lot happier if it were socially acceptable to associate with girls of any age. Girls who are ~9 to 11 are usually simply delightful to be around. They have feminine grace and charm without the constant mind-games that teens and adults have. If a man wants to spend a few hours on a "date" to experience something more carefree, he should be able to. I'm not even talking about sex.

One of the reasons why a lot of grown men are miserable is that their choice for opposite-sex partners is limited to confused man-clones with tits, or the husks of women who burned themselves out on all the boys and men they pleased from age 13+. Patriarchy, my ass.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 14:35:40 cb6f05 No.88

Who is the girl in the photo

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 15:19:31 09200b No.89

>>88
Ryan Newman, an american actress.

Suika 09/25/14 (Thu) 15:33:49 ea4be0 No.90

File: 1411659229710.jpg (196.92 KB, 587x1358, 587:1358, pedophiles.jpg)

>>89
Reminds me that I have this.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 16:44:01 111d6b No.94

>>6
have u ever even fucked a 16yo? i doubt that. u want younger girls cuz no 16yo will want u.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 16:46:00 111d6b No.96

>>90
read the comments and then tell me we should make it legal to act them out…

Suika 09/25/14 (Thu) 17:18:58 ea4be0 No.99

>>96
I don't think sex with children should be legal.

Anonymous 09/25/14 (Thu) 17:27:51 8876f9 No.101

Well, for whatever reason, the law and "normal" society expects our natural human preferences to magically change for coorperations and passive enslavement agencies when we hit the magical age of 18.

Yeah, No.

!!NYa6jvIZyc 09/25/14 (Thu) 19:22:05 002d84 No.105

File: 1411672925128.gif (996.69 KB, 500x220, 25:11, tumblr_inline_n7p94akTEJ1s….gif)

>>everyone I cba to type all the numbers

Age of Consent is 16 over here in England.

==It's the age the government choose because people choose what age people "know what they're doing", or are "responsible" which we all know is absolute bullshit.== And people believe this, too. Mostly because 'ets teh lawh an teh lawh es currekt' or because they do actually believe people younger than X amount of years "don't know what their doing" because they're controlling little shits who don't realise that people have a mind of their own if you ever meet someone like this, please promptly remove their jaw for me. IMO we should have a maturity based system which would negate the need for this sort of thing and hopefully settle all arguments because we SHOULD ALL AGREE THAT MATURITY IS THE BASIS HERE, but for the time being,

If all the countries that had age of consent lowered to something like 15 and implemented some kind of thing so we don't get rapes n shit and we just went around punching the people who think that's an improper age because "dey dun kno wha dey doin" in the groin, the term "pedophalia" and how it's used and/or implied today wouldn't even exist.

Although I think we should press for pornographic content lowered to 16+ first seeing as it's an acceptable age for sex in a lot of countries and places. In fact, why don't they go together? You can have sex, but not make porn? Did common sense become a myth?

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 03:22:24 66dfd3 No.129

I'd love to see people raise teenagers more mature, because I'm fucking sick of dealing with immature adults.

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 03:23:19 66dfd3 No.130

>>129
I'm trying to say that many teenagers are raised immaturely, then grow up to be immature adults.

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 10:57:59 fde5e4 No.152

File: 1411729079682.jpg (53.74 KB, 620x625, 124:125, ThisBitchNiggaHyuh.jpg)

>>79
Your views are fine, but your argument sucks; I don't know a single person that wouldn't have a field day if they had someone else's credit card, and when given the choice, a lot of people dress like idiots (not that personal fashion has anything to do with brain development in the first place). A huge turning point in our lives happens before our brains are developed, we're allowed to take the SATs, and make a lot of important life decisions.

And by the way, you're talking about adults having sex with minors, what about minors having sex with minors; which is completely acceptable, but once I reached that magic age of 18 it's all of a sudden not in their best interest? They're going to be having sex anyway.

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 19:15:55 a9c087 No.163

>>152
What the fuck, I know that girl. Do you know her too or were her pics posted somewhere? I actually knew her decently well like two years ago. This feels weird.

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 22:43:36 c2f3d9 No.203

File: 1411771416848.png (2.12 MB, 1462x1462, 1:1, 1408714916584.png)

>>90
>i learn english because of she

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 22:58:46 4b51be No.211

File: 1411772326578.jpg (68.17 KB, 795x777, 265:259, asdasd.JPG)

freud,rice,kinsey and some other people made studies showing what men find the most atractive.

They showed them nude pictures of different people and measured their level of arousendens

almost all studies show the same pattern

preteenboys→teenboys→Males→Preteengirls→teengirls→ Woman

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 22:59:06 4b51be No.212

File: 1411772346488.jpg (66.36 KB, 795x627, 265:209, ddsadaas.JPG)

Also a bar diagramm that shows the prozentual amount of all males that are equaly or more arroused by people under 13 than by adults

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 23:11:01 0b4448 No.215

>>212

Bear in mind that these penile plethysmography tests are likely to greatly underestimate how much men are attracted to minors since the big taboos over being attracted to minors must reduce the level of physical arousal they show towards them in the lab under observation.

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 23:23:10 4b51be No.217

>>215
even if thats the case its still shows that finding children atractive is more common than homosexuality and even so it says almos a quarter of all males like kids.

even if you say that the numbers are lower than the reality is it still shows that there has to be a crap load of us out there

Anonymous 09/26/14 (Fri) 23:32:53 0b4448 No.219

>>211

Take a look at this one. In the study done in 1970 (when sexual attitudes were more liberal) men showed almost the same level of arousal to adolescents as to adults but in later studies the response went down as attraction to minors became more taboo.

This supports what I said here >>215

Anonymous 09/27/14 (Sat) 00:32:51 7c9c15 No.225

>>>/phile/6

Anonymous 09/27/14 (Sat) 02:45:29 d6ce39 No.228

>>94
this is one of the dumbest things ignorant 'normies' like to say.
There is NOBODY who is attracted to younger people because older ones won't have them.
There are numerous reasons people find attractive whomever it is that they are attracted to.
None of them are ever THAT. Anyone stupid enough to believe that is… well, stupid.

Anonymous 09/27/14 (Sat) 04:02:22 6b0667 No.230

I believe this is the most well-known and accepted "secret" society has. Why else would we have so many "she said she was 18" jokes and "barely legal" porn with a focus on the person looking young? What does the world at large want you to believe? That when you graduate high school suddenly you become unattracted to people younger than you?

Anonymous 09/27/14 (Sat) 17:16:28 f9b157 No.249

would it depend on whether the girl was autistic or not? Like the spectrum thing, where they mentaly develop about being sexually precocious at a much later age

Anonymous 09/28/14 (Sun) 23:10:48 448d33 No.274

It is nothing new that men like younger girls. We're fucking animals, in the end. We look for fertile, somehow naive and manipulable, that has little to no experience. That's a fact, I don't need to give you 'proof' because shit's right in Google, with reputable sources and consistently hard-basis.

I don't find attraction to girls, however the most sexually recurrent themes I have are those I had when I was young, with young girls. I don't feel the need to fuck young girls. It's more of a good memory, nothing else.

If anything, I look for girls that are a year or two behind me. They're normally more down to earth and less eccentric as older girls. It's as if by being young, older women think they can manipulate you and thus act more childishly than younger girls. I prefer younger (within the 1-2 year difference mark) because they tend to behave less immaturely. And I find little to no attraction to really young girls.

However, It's a fact that men like girls around the 16 yr mark. Most of them tend to take action and lure girls into sex. We know they find girls attractive; however, there are possible damages that you may do to those little girls… mainly because they're emotional capacities are way below the limits for discovering sexuality.
One thing is to feel aroused by them, and the other is to fuck a girl without the implications of her mental health.
Some girls at that age are sexually precocious and VERY curious. That doesn't mean it would be good for them and that doesn't mean it's a mentally healthy thing. Most girls I've met end up having a rekt life. REALLY fucked up I tell you.
Most men I've known who are deeply attracted to young girls -around 14 yrs- are highly uneducated men that justify themselves in the "we have instincts' 'cavemen' idea.

So yea, it's true. Men generally like younger girls.
That doesn't mean it's 'good'. Just consider the pros and cons about it.

Anonymous 09/29/14 (Mon) 02:40:01 91ce9e No.276

Laws in society are preventative. We've settled on 18 for a reason. That's because it's a race to the bottom from there on out.

It's like drinking and driving. One drink can put you over the limit. But you and everyone else knows that you can drive just as well after 2 (maybe even 3).

But if the law allowed 2, people would drink 3.

All men are attracted to teens. But the age of consent is high to make dipping down to 16 feel immoral, instead of 14.

I dunno. This shit isn't going to change. Society has made its choice. Best thing to do is just live with it and keep your fantasies in your dreams.

Anonymous 09/29/14 (Mon) 14:28:38 0b4448 No.287

>>274
>Most men I've known who are deeply attracted to young girls -around 14 yrs- are highly uneducated men that justify themselves in the "we have instincts' 'cavemen' idea.

Maybe the dumb men are more in touch with their caveman instincts and haven't tried to kid themselves that preferring young girls is abnormal.

Anonymous 09/30/14 (Tue) 04:01:48 47d548 No.313

>>15
Speak for yourself. The older I get the less tolerance I have for younger girls and the more I appreciate older women. There's not a teenage girl in existence capable of consistently rational conversations. And not a teenage girl in existence with the life, personal, professional, and sexual skills a grown man desires in a wife.

Anonymous 09/30/14 (Tue) 06:48:22 0d9e29 No.318

>>79
But they are mature enough at age 16 to operate machines that kill… at least 30,000 people in America each year.

Anonymous 09/30/14 (Tue) 06:52:55 0d9e29 No.319

>>276
>We've settled on 18 for a reason

That reason is that California and New York(the creators of the majority of film we see) has 18 as their ages of consent. Half of the United States and all of Canada have the age lower than 18. But the movies and TV shows we watch tell us that 18 is the right age. Because of this, people ignore the laws of their own area and make it into a taboo. Were you even aware that age of consent is not universal? What state do you live in?

Anonymous 10/01/14 (Wed) 23:39:02 4d0aa6 No.363

This evidence isn't at all compelling. I haven't done the research, but its easy to find a few studies to vaguely back unlikely points.

Just look at the girls that men all around you are going wild for, 99% of them have finished puberty. The girls in sexy music videos are always post-pubescent.

That's not to say men wouldn't be interested in pubescent girls, but the attraction is less significant to the point they can pretend it doesn't exist

Anonymous 10/02/14 (Thu) 01:15:21 0b4448 No.365

>>363

In public maybe men go for older girls because of the taboos over attraction to minors. In the privacy of the internet men show their true colours and look for girls closer to 13 than 18 which is the preference that biology predicts.

Anonymous 10/02/14 (Thu) 12:34:18 f35ca9 No.372

>>365
Uh, then why are all the pedo communities on the web so small?
If you think boards aren't dedicated to large breasts aren't vastly more popular you either have a very narrow view of the internet or you've been blinded by a biased worldview.

It is plain as day that the vast majority of woman marketed to men via the internet are post-pubescent. And the multi-billion dollar business involved in this would very quickly jump on budding breasts and baby faces if they were the most popular thing.

Japan on the other hand is quite different, they actually do market 13 year olds to men. But no more than older busty women.

Anonymous 10/02/14 (Thu) 14:14:18 0b4448 No.375

>>372

Oh, come on. Look at what the most popular groups are on porn sites. It's nearly always teens. They obviously can't use real 14yr olds but they do try to make them look younger than 18.

The porn site motherless.com allows users to create their own groups that other people can view and post in. Before they got strict these were the top ten groups:

1. Young
2. Stickam
3. Incest
4. Jailbait
5. Daughters
6. Teen
7. deutsche teens
8. little puff nipples and hairless pussys
9. School Girls
10. Very Cute Only

The "Young" group was mostly filled with girls about 14. If there were no legal restrictions that's what the porn industry would be using.

Similarly, before reddit got strict the most popular subreddit was /r/jailbait which was devoted to pictures and videos of girls about 12-16. This subreddit was so popular it was the first thing that came up in google when people searched for "reddit".

Anonymous 10/02/14 (Thu) 20:09:26 f7c79a No.379

File: 1412280566525.png (57.18 KB, 1393x632, 1393:632, Age_of_Consent[1].png)

The truth is that an age of consent can accurately determine when people are ready for sex is just a convenient legal fiction. While it might be ideal to determine things maturity and awareness of consequences on a case-by-case basis, that is obviously a lot more work than picking a magic number and deciding "eh, enough people at this age can handle it that I'm okay with it."

Of course, not everyone can agree on what the magic number should be. That's why it's time to bust out the map.

Anonymous 10/02/14 (Thu) 20:11:57 f7c79a No.381

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Also Dave Chappelle's bit is always relevant.

Anonymous 10/02/14 (Thu) 20:51:33 0b4448 No.384

>>379

Across England and Europe it used to be 10. When Europeans colonised America they too this fashion with them and set it at about 10 in most states. I think the lowest was 7.

Then the fashion changed to about 12 and everyone put it up.

Now the fashion in Europe is about 16 and 18 in America.

What next? 21? Or will people realise that high AOC's are pointless and lower them back to something like 12?

Who knows.

Anonymous 10/02/14 (Thu) 20:52:39 0b4448 No.385

>>384

*took this fashion

Anonymous 10/03/14 (Fri) 00:59:57 74bde9 No.396

>>375
You can't use post-pubescent girls as evidence that people are into pubescent girls. I know people like young girls, 16-20 years old, but I fail to see evidence of 14 year olds being more popular than 16-20 year olds.

Anonymous 10/03/14 (Fri) 10:12:54 fe1fea No.414

>>396

14 year olds are more popular in the groups made by the users themselves. The porn sites obviously can't provide 14 year olds like the market wants. The closest they can get is 18.

Anonymous 10/03/14 (Fri) 16:57:35 113a4a No.430

File: 1412355455091.png (197.78 KB, 1500x1125, 4:3, 86144647.png)

>compelling evidence

That's not empirical evidence, that's just your interpretation of a study and your opinion on sexuality

Compelling evidence would include the following:
- multiple studies finding the same results
- objective observations
- experiments which prove or disprove theories
- using the scientific method and techniques

You're using pseudoscience by relying on just one or two studies to make your case, and you're using confirmation bias by claiming your opinion is a fact and your interpretation is evidence of said fact.

But than again, you pedophiles are desperate to prove you're normal so you can abuse kids. You don't care about what I just wrote because you don't care about science, reason or philosophy: you just care about fucking kids, and you're not fucking kidding anyone but yourselves about it.

Anonymous 10/03/14 (Fri) 17:33:46 fe1fea No.431

>>430

OP here. I'll write a big post in the next day or two explaining more about the biology of men's preferences for adolescent virgins and provide more supporting evidence.

Anonymous 10/04/14 (Sat) 12:29:36 74bde9 No.447

>>430
You make a bunch of claims about pedophiles that you can't back with science. I think you probably used confirmation bias in constructing your ideology on the matter.

Even though some pedos are affected by confirmation bias, our opponents use it just as much. Hell, even the scientists can't help but be affected as they'd lose their reputation if they did anything that could vaguely make them look like a pedosympathiser

Anonymous 10/06/14 (Mon) 06:54:17 6edb2f No.486

>>384
Well you can't seriously suggest that 10 was a good age. I believe especially in our time young girls just have too much to do, when it used to be 10 woman was wife and only wife. There were no need to educate her or give her opportunities to be who she wanted to be but just give her to rich guy who would fuck her brains out but share his profits. Today girl is equality to the man, that means her education is much more important than her marriage. Also where I live age of consent is 14, doesn't change the fact that I'm forever wizard.

Anonymous 10/07/14 (Tue) 19:19:51 af8a20 No.551

I have seen a lot of dumb ass, stupid shit posted on the boards…

Finally, something that is very intelligent and well thought out. Good job OP, and your supporters.

Please advertise this thread. EVERYWHERE.

Anonymous 10/08/14 (Wed) 08:55:27 1969e5 No.580

>>6
>* The vulvas that get posted in “Post up the best looking pussies” threads on porn sites always look like they belong to girls about 12 or 14. They are nice and neat with little or no pubic hair and have a virginal, slightly immature look about them.
Not trying to destroy your dreams or anything, but I (and the female friends I played doctor with hgnn ~) got our pubes when we were 9.

Anonymous 10/08/14 (Wed) 13:17:36 af8a20 No.585

>>430
if the same Military Industrial Complex, that uses PETA and Feminism to take away people's right, that is also known under another name Big Pharma, uses the Marijuana harmful studies of days gone by to justify themselves on sexuality, then I say the Emperor has no clothes. No wonder other cultures are out breeding America, and the Empire will soon crumble.

Controlling people's reproductive rights and the activities that stem from that, is the quickest way to control a nation.

Anonymous 10/12/14 (Sun) 00:46:02 965f57 No.713

>>379
I'm going to move to either Germany or Japan, both seem to be more conservative-yet-not-retarded and still have a lower age of consent, or Denmark since I have family there. Hell If life in Iran gets a bit better I might mary a 13 year old over there and have a shit ton of Aryan kids with her.

Anonymous 10/12/14 (Sun) 00:48:10 965f57 No.714

>>430
I'm actually an Ephebophile but ok, if you're definition is "anyone who likes girls under 18 is a pedo" then go ahead and stay in your fantasy mid 1800s Britain, prude.

Anonymous 10/14/14 (Tue) 22:08:29 2d98ff No.803

>>714
They didn't think that back then.

Anonymous 10/15/14 (Wed) 19:26:00 c1eb0c No.829

I grew up before sex education in a household where sex was not mentioned. I knew girls were different than boys, but until I saw a naked woman in the flesh (at 19), I had no idea what a naked woman looked like. So, why when I was 12, did I know I wanted to be with a naked 12 year-old girl? Nature I assume. I'll admit, they looked enticing then, and they still do.

Skip ahead til now. Sixty three, recently widowed, setting up criteria on seekingarrangementsdotcom and what is the minimum age I enter for prospective partners? Forty Five. Why, would I do that when I can easily afford an 18 year old? Because looks are just that, looks. The pleasure a mature adult should experience from a sexual relationship should be based on more than looks, because that is such a limited part of a person.

Anyway, yes, young girls are beautiful, but if a grown man enjoys the company of a child more than the company of a woman in his bed, he is a broken person and not an adult in any meaningful way.

Anonymous 10/17/14 (Fri) 03:02:18 b30eb7 No.847

File: 1413514938549.jpg (52.5 KB, 729x410, 729:410, 729x.jpg)

>>8

Pedofiles are selfish,and only think about themselves.They should do the only right thing - go kill yourself!

Anonymous 10/17/14 (Fri) 03:03:33 b30eb7 No.848

>>15
In Norwey you can have sex with a girl how is 16

Anonymous 10/17/14 (Fri) 03:07:06 b30eb7 No.849

>>86
go kill yourself

Anonymous 10/17/14 (Fri) 03:09:53 b30eb7 No.850

File: 1413515393129.jpg (87.79 KB, 412x619, 412:619, g675dri75t.jpg)

>>287

Temooo@safe-mail.net tim bur ton 10/17/14 (Fri) 08:35:39 ed520f No.851

best place to chat
http://jpbxkwilt46q3a5k.onion/chat.php

Anonymous 10/17/14 (Fri) 23:03:18 655202 No.860

>>7

Many age of consent laws came about due to child prostitution in the 1800s and the resulting social hysteria surrounding it.

Nowadays some people may or may not think prostitution should be legal. But do you think 14-year-old prostitutes would be safe in that profession? Maybe they would be safer if they never traveled and only operated in brothels, but living in brothels isn't a very happy life.

The fact that sex trafficking still exists (often for child prostitution) also generates concern for minors. You could suggest that the age of consent and prostitution are unrelated issues. But if she can consent to sex, that makes the exchange of money for sex a possibility. You might think that's not a bad thing at all, but a lot of females who do that don't get to keep all that money, there is someone else capitalizing on it. I don't know if countries with legal prostitution set the age of prostitution above the age of consent, but if the age of consent is lower, trading money for sex is still a possibility.

You may find younger females attractive, but like many things in life, a few bad apples spoil it for everyone else. You may want to be with a 14-year-old, but what do you think of the idea of that 14-year-old cheating on you with another older man? What do you think of every creepy guy in the world being able to pay for sex with that 14-year-old? If people only had sex within marriage and you and the 14-year-old were married, that's one thing (that many people may or may not think should be allowed), but since people don't only have sex within marriage, and since people often pay money for sex, this is the situation society has created. And there is a sense that these naive or ignorant persons should be protected to prevent them from making wildly stupid decisions, especially in this globalized world.

People talk about male preference and evolutionary psychology and past history and prehistory, but that was also a time when humans had not invented money, which is based on the abstract idea that two different things can be equivalent and exchangeable, and it allows for more exploitation via the parasitic mode of profit. I suppose the "free love" movement was opposed to prostitution, and even opposed to possessiveness of a mate, but sexual jealousy is another evolved biological response. And liberal sexual ideas merely contributed to the spread of sexually transmitted infections.

Would you prefer to be with a 14-year-old virgin, or a 14-year-old who has slept with 100 men? In some Middle Eastern countries, they marry children to ensure she will be a virgin, although I don't know how soon they have sex. And whether virginity is a valuable trait is a contentious issue.

Anonymous 10/17/14 (Fri) 23:27:46 655202 No.862

>>274

>Most girls I've met end up having a rekt life. REALLY fucked up I tell you.

Is that because a man who loved them left them and abandoned them?

What's more damaging to her mental health? The fact that an older man shows affection to her, the fact that she is conditioned to be embarrassed or ashamed for it, or the fact that he leaves her which can feel like a betrayal?

Abandonment and ostracism and exclusion and being a part of the outgroup is traumatic for all kinds of social animals. Because in the wild being on your own often means death.

>Most men I've known who are deeply attracted to young girls -around 14 yrs- are highly uneducated men that justify themselves in the "we have instincts' 'cavemen' idea.

Are the women you know who have rape fantasies highly uneducated women? Most women with rape fantasies won't dare admit it and keep it a secret because it's not socially acceptable to admit it. Do you think rape fantasies are not also rooted in instinctual caveman behavior in the past?

Females instinctively seek out taller older stronger men, they're attracted to power and status. And rape fantasies are often based on the idea that a man (or a group of men) is so attracted to her, that she is so amazingly attractive, that they can't control themselves. That she has that kind of power of seduction over men. But she's also attracted to someone who can overpower her, here is a strong man. And because she didn't consent to it, she doesn't have to feel guilty or ashamed for enjoying sex. And what arouses females (which is almost any kind of sex, even watching bonobos having sex) may be adaptations from previous generations to prepare her body for sex. But women are culturally conditioned to say something doesn't turn them on, so there is often a disconnect between their brain and their genitals, between what they say is a turnon or turnoff, and how her body primally reacts.

Females are more like cavewomen than you think. Some would say even more than men, who often tend to more intellectual pursuits and tool-making.

>We're fucking animals, in the end.

"The truth about female desire: It's base, animalistic and ravenous."

Anonymous 10/17/14 (Fri) 23:39:12 655202 No.863

>>15

I like younger and older females.

My age range has expanded, although I am more attracted to younger females.

However, the personality and culture of some younger females makes some of them less desirable. She may be the hottest girl in the world, but as soon as she opens her mouth I start seeing her as a crazy vapid retard.

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 00:02:39 655202 No.864

>>79

Were young girls mentally mature enough to have sex hundreds or thousands of years ago? You might say the world was different then, because human culture was different then, but I would say in the past that humans lived more in the "real" world than they do now.

It would only be because humans have created an unreal world, an artificial world, that people can now be immature until they're 18, or 30, or 50, or 80. Technology infantilizes people and blinds them to what living in the "real" world truly entails. Humans have crafted entire civilizations to escape from living in the real world, the wild, where every other animal on Earth lives and eats and survives and breeds, but humans say making money and living in a city or suburb is the "real" world. But the whole reason humans live in shelters is to avoid living in the real world, the world outside, "in real life" as it's called. A homeless guy lives in the real world more than a guy in a skyscraper. But since humans hunt wild animals to extinction, he know has to gather money (a human invention) to trade for food provided by someone else. Can you imagine seeing firsthand the faces of every animal you've ever eaten?

If after high school is the "real" world, does that make "childhood" and schooling the artificial world? Or is the artificial world the one piped to people through the media and television and internet? Isn't the artificial world the concrete asphalt powerline paved-road skyscraper plastic gasoline grid world? Cities and states and nations are the artificial world, the world of human make believe.

In many areas on Earth, there are people who live in the real world. And wild animals live in the real world. Then there are people who don't want to live in the real world, a world of daily survival, and escape to the world of comfort and stories and human social constructs.

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 02:54:08 655202 No.867

>>211

So heterosexual men find preteen boys, teen boys, and males the most attractive?

I doubt that. Even if the Kinsey scale suggests everyone is bisexual to some extent.

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 02:58:16 655202 No.868

>>215

Tests involving plethysmographs and genitals typically involve the plethysmograph to measure genital arousal, but also a survey for people to cognitively rate how aroused they are.

Surveys often reflect cultural conditioning and societal taboos, whereas instruments measuring genitals give a more accurate measurement of arousal.

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 03:01:41 655202 No.869

>>217
>it still shows that there has to be a crap load of us out there

Why do you think there's a law?

Do you think there's a law against speeding because speeders are a tiny minority so authorities can safely outlaw it? No, there's a law because if it was legal tons of people would do it all the time (and some still do it even though it's against the law).

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 03:06:46 655202 No.870

>>319

Different countries do have different age of consent laws. Different states do have different age of consent laws and different marriagable age laws, but when someone crosses state lines federal law in the US says the age of consent is 18.

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 03:31:05 655202 No.871

>>430

Saying that pedophiles only care about fucking kids is what's not scientific and confirmation bias.

Being aroused by certain kids is not the same as wanting to actually fuck kids. If I'm aroused by runway models, does that mean I want to abuse runway models? No. You might reply that runway models can consent to sex, but arousal and attraction don't involve consent, and being aroused is different than having sex.

You think attraction must always be acted on? You think people must eat every hamburger that looks delicious? Some people are content with their fantasies. Some people are not. But I bet that many people who think that fantasies are not enough believe in romantic love between adults and children, and by oversimplifying such a relationship to mere "fucking" you think sex is the only reason an adult would like the company of children.

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 15:31:19 965f57 No.882

>>847
You probably live in some Scandinavian country, and judging by the hills not Denmark. The legal age of consent over there is around 14-16, I've looked it up. This is a board for pedo-hebe and Ephebophiles, Ephebophiles being the ones you'd never be able to arrest in your country. Want to arrest Ephebophiles? Move to Murka.

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 18:49:09 c7aba6 No.889

File: 1413658149526.png (391.38 KB, 800x600, 4:3, holycrap.png)

Without repeating things, /hebe/ has undergone a nuking.

If you have a moment, read the picture and consider helping us a little.

Thank you!

Anonymous 10/18/14 (Sat) 23:05:26 a5b1fe No.893

>>868
>whereas instruments measuring genitals give a more accurate measurement of arousal.

Social norms and taboos must have an effect on these measurements too.

Many sexologists seem to think that phallometry is a precise and direct measurement of sexual attraction when it obviously isn't. It's basically just putting an elastic band on a man's knob and measuring how much it stretches when he's shown some dirty pictures. There's many things that can affect the results such as the fact the subject is being observed, that the tests take place under artificial laboratory conditions and the skewing caused by social norms and taboos. Hardly precise science.

Anonymous 10/19/14 (Sun) 00:16:52 655202 No.895

>>893

And instruments that measure vaginal wetness show that women are aroused by nearly all depictions of sex, and not only human sex. But in survey responses they claim they weren't as aroused as their vagina would indicate. The survey responses are more skewed by social norms that the genital measurements, which show what turns women on at a primitive level. The studies by Chivers showed that female subjects were "turned on right away by all of it." "vaginal pulse amplitude, soared no matter who was on the screen and regardless of what they were doing, to each other, to themselves." And female sexuality "is not, for the most part, sparked or sustained by emotional intimacy and safety", despite what culture tries to say.

"The keypad contradicted the plethysmograph, contradicted it entirely. Minds denied bodies. The self-reports announced indifference to the bonobos. But that was only for starters. When the films were of women touching themselves or enmeshed with each other, the straight subjects said they were a lot less excited than their genitals declared. During the segments of gay male sex, the ratings of the heterosexual women were even more muted—even less linked to what was going on between their legs. Chivers was staring at an objective and subjective divide, too, in the data from the lesbians: low keypad scores whenever men were having sex or masturbating in the films."

"Yet the lesbians’ blood rushed hard during scenes of gay male porn. When Chivers analyzed the evidence, transmitted from vaginal membranes to sensor to software, when she set it out in graphs of vertical bars, the female libido looked omnivorous."

Anonymous 10/20/14 (Mon) 04:44:21 68bb9d No.910

>>384
>about 16

I still really don't get why you can have real sex at 16 but can't be photographed doing so until two years later

Anonymous 10/24/14 (Fri) 06:30:25 a08c94 No.959

cur.lv/ekofa

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 09:07:32 ba53b8 No.1183

I really don't get why this bullshit post has been pinned. This isn't science, it's a one-sided cherry-picked argument, there's no reason the information given by this post should be taken seriously

Anonymous 11/13/14 (Thu) 19:15:07 2f0661 No.1185

>>1183

what's wrong?

Enkidu 11/14/14 (Fri) 12:52:05 8b172f No.1195

>>1185
I just don't like the post is all. Every time I come here I have to scroll past it

Anonymous 11/23/14 (Sun) 12:38:44 ed06e4 No.1294

>>1195
use [-]

Anonymous 01/03/15 (Sat) 20:28:03 acc324 No.1728

>>79
On the other hand, there are studies that show the brain goes into cognitive decline and significantly loses plasticity after 25…

It's true, men are naturally mostly heterosexual hebephilic Anonymous 01/06/15 (Tue) 15:25:40 c3541e No.1739

Great post. Here are some articles supporting your theory.

Is pedophilia natural?:
http://egomoral.com/is-pedophilia-natural/

Here's a statement by Allen Frances (a member of the APA) who backs up your idea.

““Hebephilia” is a simply terrible idea. The basic issue is that sexual attraction to pubescent youngsters is not the slightest bit abnormal or unusual. Until recently, the age of consent was age 13 years in most parts of the world (including the United Statse) and it remains 14 in many places. Evolution has programmed humans to lust for pubescent youngsters—our ancestors did not get to live long enough to have the luxury of delaying reproduction.
For hundreds of thousands of years, sex followed closely behind puberty. Only recently has society chosen to protect the moratorium of adolescence and to declare as inappropriate and illegal a sexual interest in the pubescent. This is a wonderful idea, but you can’t change human nature by fiat. Surveys show that sexual interest in pubescent youngsters remains very common and anyone who doubts the numbers should do a study of Calvin Klein ads.”
–Allen Frances, MD
- See more at:http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/hebephilia-crime-not-mental-disorder#sthash.dWlet1lc.dpuf

Heterosexual hebephilic relationships are very common in human history even more so than than same-age relationships in modern feminized society.

For example, Mary was Joseph's child bride.
http://youtu.be/62kfJ3NywuA?t=2m11s

Anonymous 01/06/15 (Tue) 21:28:12 544305 No.1743

>>1739
>For example, Mary was Joseph's child bride.

Yep. Puberty has been the traditional age of marriage for lolis. It's obviously the way nature intended.

Anonymous ## Board Owner 03/04/15 (Wed) 01:06:43 c96610 No.2187

Hi, everyone. I'm the new Board Owner.

>>6
This sticky is based as hell, so I'm leaving it up. Great thing to show to people.

>>889
That girl is cute, but the picture makes me nervous. Take note: Thongs aren't allowed on this board. But I'll leave this one for the history of it.

Anonymous 03/04/15 (Wed) 08:32:09 7396ff No.2194

>>889
But what if i'm aroused by pubescent inviduals approx 11-14+

Anonymous 03/07/15 (Sat) 13:31:55 811b32 No.2243

>>486
You know you could have a sexual or maybe even a nonsexual relationship and still get an education right?We pretty much all do it,even from a young age.

Anonymous 03/07/15 (Sat) 13:39:09 811b32 No.2244

>>829
>tl;dr:I ignore physical attractiveness when choosing someone to 'afford',and so should you.
Also:
>admits physical attraction to 12 year olds
>doesn't know what to do about it,because stunted sexual growth;lol,thanks mom and dad.
>conceal,don't feel.
Let it go,oldfag.Let it go.They can't hold you back any more.

Anonymous 03/07/15 (Sat) 18:28:21 887d3e No.2252

File: 1425752901443.jpg (14.06 KB, 600x251, 600:251, Frozen1.jpg)

>>2244
*Check 'em.*

Anonymous 03/08/15 (Sun) 20:45:51 7396ff No.2279

How do you know if you really are a pedo, hebe or ephe or something else?
Is it just "if you get aroused you know you are one"?
How can the person be sure of that?

Anonymous 03/08/15 (Sun) 21:58:04 6229c6 No.2280

>>2279
Human sexuality is complicated, and it's hard to really know anything for sure. No need to worry too much about it.

Anonymous 03/09/15 (Mon) 06:11:43 7396ff No.2292

>>2280
I feel like i want to know, but i guess you are right too.

Anonymous 03/09/15 (Mon) 06:30:45 887d3e No.2293

>>2292
In thinking about what you are, ask yourself what types of girls you're attracted to, and which you're primarily attracted to, if any. If you like hebe girls sometimes, but they're not your primary attraction, that would mean you're not a hebephile, as an example.

Anonymous 03/09/15 (Mon) 06:42:30 7396ff No.2294

>>2293
I haven't really paid attention to what kinda girls i'm attracted.

Anonymous 03/11/15 (Wed) 13:10:50 6a49b4 No.2318

>>15
When I was 12 I was captivated by 10~13 year olds. That was near two decades ago and I'm still captivated by 10~13 year olds.

Anonymous 03/18/15 (Wed) 19:31:35 b31b49 No.2332

>>2243
True. It's annoying the wild assumption that if a sexual relationship is involved everything else stops and the girl gets locked in a basement.

Anonymous 03/31/15 (Tue) 10:52:26 7c24c6 No.2433

>>860
bla bla bla, its legal in germany and we dont face any of those problems

some people are so insecure they cant have fun so they want to ruin for others as well

Anonymous 04/09/15 (Thu) 18:58:53 a0c684 No.2494

>>79
So why is the age of consent 16, 15 or even 14 in some (modern, developed) countries? Are they "pretty fucked up"?

Anonymous 04/09/15 (Thu) 19:04:48 a0c684 No.2495

>>94
I dated a 16-year-old when I was 26. She was an excellent lay. Her parents were delighted with the idea that I was fucking their daughter, because I had a car and a job and stuff.

For the record, 16 is legal where I live.

Anonymous 04/09/15 (Thu) 23:01:31 682d36 No.2497

>>2495
Hot as fuck. Lucky bastard.

Anonymous 04/14/15 (Tue) 19:30:33 0e83b5 No.2547

>>8
I would bone these two so hard.

Anonymous 04/15/15 (Wed) 16:22:52 31b255 No.2548

>>2547
Yeah, they're really good looking.

Anonymous 04/27/15 (Mon) 08:23:07 dcdc28 No.2638

>>714

age of consent in England around that time was 10

Anonymous 04/27/15 (Mon) 09:22:04 21f1d7 No.2639

>>2638

Fucking awesome.

Anonymous 05/18/15 (Mon) 15:51:23 e4756b No.2782

>>6

Excellent post, OP. I like women of all ages, but I wonder whether minors are really protected by the bullshit idea that they're not attractive - that just encourages pedos not to take any age limit seriously.

>>79

You don't need to have a fully developed brain to have sex. It's not rocket surgery.

Anonymous 05/18/15 (Mon) 16:30:30 e4756b No.2783

File: 1431966630190.jpg (64.92 KB, 500x435, 100:87, muhlady.jpg)

>Studie 4: Fedora u.a. (1992)

Informed Anonymous SAGE! 05/21/15 (Thu) 04:28:02 000000 No.2799

I'm new here AND I've only read a few posts at the top of this thread BUT I wanted to say 2 cents, I hope it hasn't been said already in which case f u. ;-P kek

Unfortunately, for those with griping whys, the answer is societal laws, businesses, and politicians. More exactly - money & power. After the 1st or 2nd World War businesses created the term "teen", just like "tween" in recent years to dictate a group to sell to. Before that they were just younger adults. For this special group were special products supporting a special mentality, while done for appeal/luring to money/gain the two power classes, educators and politicians, picked it up and did what they do - used it as a way to dumb down people and to scare people so they can stay in power or their group and ideas can stay in power. Power equals control and money, prestige and access. Once a group and mentality of lower degree are created then media is used to scare the un/poorly-educated public in order to support new laws which create criminals, a class made for controling and profiting from the opposition (like war veterans, as 1 group example, those trained and experienced in combat forms, are presently targeted to make into criminals in the u s today). Eventually you have people brainwashed, er educated, longer into holding the accepted views. They're also kept powerless longer. The opposing viewers, the most free thinkers and idealists are kept in hiding or criminalized, and restricted from propagating, all to render powerless and disappear. And, as another said, the minds (and abilities) of the new group "teens" is no longer on par with having sex and/or kids, i.e. responsibility. Unlike another said, their bodies are not only ready but are ready much, much earlier, this because of all the hormones pumped into our food to make it bigger and look ready while having no nutrients and being totally unhealthy, even harmful.

Yes, like the homos except 2 things. 1 Many were hiding lawyers, judges, politicians and had enough after a particular mass beating by police at a club in the 70s or early 80s. They then used their power to circumvent the legal process and create laws in the courts. 2 Children have long been used to scare into submission. Homos have had to keep the boy buggery under wraps to accomplish anything. All the early years of including it held them back. Also, the child thing has been used to make extremely outrageous, constitutionally illegal, and even judge controlling laws against "our" group.

So, let me ask you, how long will you - the new current, the older generation, and the upcoming and future generations keep saying, "one day, in the future", while keeping distant from laws proposed and made, from the rare few challenges to exsisting laws - challenges made by the already criminalized, from refuting the biased lies by media, politicians, and educators? Why not discuss learning to debate, educate, lobby? If you are not yet a criminal then you are the one who holds the power to educate yourself and put forth action so that the one day may come in the next generation or two or three.

Think about that for a change.

Anonymous 05/21/15 (Thu) 04:50:46 000000 No.2800

>>287

or maybe most men he knows simply are uneducated.

Rich and/or powerful people get their shit but keep it under wraps. Even if under wraps is as little as everyone in the class knows but you just don't air it out to the public/media (the parts that wouldn't keep your secret) cuz then 'I'd' get my shit known. The upper politicians and extremely rich (both educated classes) are probably the most well satisfied in having these interests and having them met. And don't think professors and whatever don't know about getting theirs even though they don't have the money to secure full, consistsnt, unbridled access.

Anonymous 05/21/15 (Thu) 05:35:24 000000 No.2801

>>379

Didn't even use to be an aoc. Late 19th / early 20th centusry femists lobbied in communities and in legislature until they got laws made then bumped ages up. Even now you used to be able to have sex, get charged, get cleared if you could prove that the girl didn't look so young at the time you did her. New laws make it don't matter, your guilty and convicted. AoC is also not so clear cut. AoC doesn't mean that an adult, or even all teens, can tap dat arse, it just means the difference between legal, statutory rape, or rape, at least at one time in at least some states. Now… And yes some states are lower or at least were lower until recently.

But that goes to show things can change because they have changed. This point though is a fight against something 100 yrs old. That's produced the time and opportunity to reeducate people about what's 'acceptable', add in the choice of people to gather together around and pursecute for the last 2 decades and things have quickly changed for the worse for everyone. Like the old saying over nazi germany about i didn't speak up when X was pursecuted because i wasn't X, and repeat and repeat until, now I'm be persecuted and there's no one left to speak up. The laws are so illegal, and drastically harmful but they scare people to accept, even rute for them, they don't realize what's gonna happen. Either eventually it'll turn around - some - like the u s past persecutions against tribal indians, blacks, mentally ill or, more likely as it's seemed from the start AND has actually been occuring over last 7ish years, they'll add groups, not to mention tougher persecutions. Right now we have officially the 'sex offenders' (which if you look at registry laws has continually been bumped up and up and now includes non sexual crimes) unofficially the returned military and semi officially the mentally ill once more except this time they're not forced locked up and forced sterilized it's that they're a danger due to gun access - the guv, imo, keep stageing mass murders and trying to take more of our guns and blame the mentally ill. But who'll be next?

Anyway, time created ingrained and supported wrong ideas and teens who aren't ready. (education has gone so dumb that current twenty somethings - adults - are both ignorant and stupid as bricks, generally) So, fighting for reversal at this point will require more, longer, harder work but at least it can still be undertaken, much longer and the police state will be completed. See, much bigger issues here guys. And if you're non u s don't think you're immune, what do you think the e u is modeled after? the u s is supposed to be united for trade and war power otherwise completely separate countries (synonyms: nations, states). They were but the union illegally overreached while the people did nothing and the states acquiesced until you have all clones. Or you can wait while mussies overwhelm and enact sharia. both equally bad options imo.

Anonymous 05/21/15 (Thu) 05:50:39 000000 No.2802

>>384

>Across England and Europe it used to be 10. When Europeans colonised America they too this fashion with them and set it at about 10 in most states. I think the lowest was 7.

oh, 7-8 would be perfectly lovely. And I agree with another that it doesn't mean sex has to be involved just to be with a girl but eduacation/maturity as well as her own temperment. On the other hand, no sex doesn't necessarily have to exclude all sexual acts. In fact, what might be sexually satisfying for the adult could be presented to the youth as non sexually specific but pleasurable, like nudity with cuddling or full body massage / rubbing / kissing.

The sickest people will always be around and do their harm regardless of laws; laws allow us to hopefully minimalize their harm.

Relaxed laws, as they would seem as now, would likely encourage the large number of not-give-a-shit's to do as they please instead of being sensible and concerned for any partner. That is the bad or sad thing imo.

Anonymous 05/21/15 (Thu) 05:54:10 000000 No.2803

>>414

yes, hollywood and pornswood are only going to press so far publicly. they want to bring in as much they can but they prefer to stay open to keep bringing in what they can.

Anonymous 05/21/15 (Thu) 05:59:12 000000 No.2804

>>430

And the laws aren't based on or care about science. They're based on emotion and care about power and money but materialists like you don't want to hear it even when one or more scientists present favorable, overwhelming, even empirical evidence of a new/differing viewpoint of anything.

Anonymous 05/21/15 (Thu) 06:05:25 000000 No.2805

>>829

for the most part a very good post

Anonymous 05/21/15 (Thu) 06:17:23 000000 No.2806

>>860

stupid

money was here a hundred yrs ago while chikd prostitution was happening, even so trade, item for item, was around before money as a form of money, a better form imo.

and prostitutes…. makes me sick the johns are posted on billboards and tv while the hookers keep walking. prostitution is illegal most pkaces in u s. illegal means crime. prostitution is selling sex (after you've made yourself available, shown your intention, enticed, lured/drawn in the customer you've been looking for continuously). and hookers keep on doing it. why arent they sex offenders??? oh, because they're female and because they're regular informants…

Anonymous 06/18/15 (Thu) 01:18:04 2a4cdf No.3044

>>430

well as its illegal to test it fairly whats the solution?

Anonymous 06/18/15 (Thu) 15:15:08 c0b42b No.3057

(A vulva that’s tight and fresh looking is a sign that the girl it belongs to hasn’t started reproducing yet and still has all of her fertile years ahead of her.)

false as fuck. A vulva could be lose before sexual activity. Additionally the most fertile and best time for a baby is in her 20's.

Also the "best looking vulva" sounds like a random fetish and does not take into account that women are born with a certain kind, age is not a factor.

If you want to rape kids whatever but do not pretend medical practices or science is own your side. Go talk to a gynecologist(most are male) and learn about cunts. Most would be surprised that some girls don't have a hymen, that there are stds that affect women but are undetectable on men, that getting pregnant does not men her body can handle it or child birth, that non painful consensual sex can still cause bleeding and injury….

Basically i am ahead of the game while you niggers stay behind

Anonymous 06/18/15 (Thu) 18:50:29 a3e67c No.3058

>>3057

Why are you here with talk like that?

Anonymous 06/19/15 (Fri) 22:48:29 eda817 No.3071

>>3058

First off faggot nigger i can be anywhere i want. Next stop being a stupid whiny cunt. This is public anyone can post this is not your private area. For child rapist you nigger cunts are so weak which is why you rape kids and bitch about women. You should kill yourself nigger. Addressing, me like a stupid child raping cunt

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

Aryan Lolicon 06/23/15 (Tue) 23:53:09 9917a6 No.3128

>>3071

rekt

Anonymous 06/24/15 (Wed) 04:03:24 d8f275 No.3134

>>79

>but 18 makes sense since it's right after they've finished high school

Since when does finishing highschool equal maturity. It's arbitrary. You're a part of the system, m8

Anonymous 06/30/15 (Tue) 17:50:19 d8e43b No.3210

Everyone who desires someone signifigantly younger than they are has pedophilic tendencies.

Anonymous 06/30/15 (Tue) 17:53:21 d8e43b No.3211

>>105

Sex should be legal, but not porn. Once it's online it's there forever.

Anonymous 06/30/15 (Tue) 18:06:52 d8e43b No.3215

>>486

There should be no age of consent, leave it to the parents.

Anonymous 07/01/15 (Wed) 08:19:16 079c8b No.3220

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>3215

Anonymous 07/16/15 (Thu) 13:29:09 5d1a40 No.3319

>>1739

Email Angelo Bonavera at angelo@vizow.com to post on egomoral.com

would you do the same? lisa 09/19/15 (Sat) 11:47:42 000000 No.3808

my name is lisa. i've been looking for a place where older guys are interested in young girls and stumbled onto this board, luckily enough

i'm 15 now. when i was 13 i was blackmailed by a guy a met online. i was stupid enough to send him pics and then he told me to meet him or he'd show them to everyone. i was even stupider to do what he said.

turned out he was a fat 40 year old man. he drove me to this abandoned building and held me for a few hours. he raped me more than once. he kept saying how pretty i was and how i was the best fuck he had. i hate remembering these details but i can't get them out of my head.

the reason i came here is to ask a simple question. when i beged him not to, he just said i deserved it because girls like me always thought we were too good for him and would never have sex with someone like him. i've thought about it and realized he was right. the only way he could have had sex with a girl like me was if he raped me…. so my question is, would you guys here do the same and rape me if you got the chance, if thats the only way you could ever have sex with a girl like me?

Anonymous 09/19/15 (Sat) 14:35:50 b42ce4 No.3811

File: 1442673350537.jpg (81.48 KB, 795x800, 159:160, resized_piseed-off-harry-m….jpg)

>>3808

>thinks we buy this bullshit story

>nice try troll

Anonymous 09/19/15 (Sat) 16:37:38 4b5695 No.3814

>>3808

Even tho obv troll, I feel the issue deserves a comment.

I wouldn't enjoy sex if I had to force a girl to fuck me.

I would rather it be consented.

Trouble is finding a 13 or 14 year old girl who'd be down.

Anonymous 09/19/15 (Sat) 23:42:54 000000 No.3817

File: 1442706175664.jpg (102.14 KB, 1092x814, 546:407, 6756928941.jpg)

>>3808

it really did happen but i don't know how else to make you believe me

>>3814

thanks for replying. so if there is no girl who is down you rather not have anyone rather than rape a girl?

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 00:02:39 b82d39 No.3818

>>3808

No, not a chance. If you get old and ugly and never get loli before then, it's your own damned fault.

>>3817

I hope you don't mind me saying, but you're ridiculously hot.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 00:04:13 632c69 No.3819

>>3808

I still don't buy your story, (it sounds too much like the movie Trust), and think you're a troll, but I'll take the bait and reply.

> i was stupid enough to send him pics

So you were a little slut at 13 and sending naked or semi naked pics to a random guy online. Well aren't you a genius.

>and then he told me to meet him or he'd show them to everyone

Everyone? Like who? Did he know all your friends to be able to show them the pics? Or were you really afraid of someone letting random people see your pics even though they'd never meet you?

>turned out he was a fat 40 year old man

waitwhat? You sent him pics of you, but never asked for pics of him in return? Verifiable pics like the one you posted with today's date and this boards name on it. Not the brightest crayon in the box huh?

>a girl like me

Hmm, you seem to mention that several times in your post. Think a bit highly of yourself huh? Like you're too good to ever have sex with "a guy like him".

IF you did get raped, then I'm sorry. To answer your question though, no, a good majority of us would never rape a girl.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 00:13:20 b82d39 No.3822

>>3819

>So you were a little slut at 13 and sending naked or semi naked pics to a random guy online. Well aren't you a genius.

That happens all the time, though.

Boy, they must have been so fucking hot…

And you're not a slut for showing n00dz, man, there's nothing sexual about being naked.

>Not the brightest crayon in the box huh?

Dude, how smart do you think an average thirteen-year-old girl is?

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 00:20:22 632c69 No.3823

>>3822

>That happens all the time, though.

Yes, because as you imply, 13-year-old girls aren't that smart.

>And you're not a slut for showing n00dz, man, there's nothing sexual about being naked.

There's a difference between "being naked" and taking naked pics of yourself to share with others. In a nudist lifestyle, no, it's not sexual. But in this case, I can almost guarantee it was to create sexual arousal in the guy and she was probably getting turned on by it also.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 02:07:27 000000 No.3826

>>3819

>Well aren't you a genius.

yes i was stupid, not a genius. but not stupid anymore. you can't see my face in the pic. lisa is obviously not my real name. i'm even using tor so you can't track me down by my ip address.

>Everyone?

yes everyone. when i was chatting to him, i sent him the emails of some guys at school that had been harassing me, he said he'd scare them away. he threatened to send my pics to those guys. i know they would have let everyone in school see them.

>you sent him pics of you, but never asked for pics of him in return?

he did sent me pics. i thought he was this 17 year old guy who was ripped. but it wasn't really him.

>Think a bit highly of yourself huh? Like you're too good to ever have sex with "a guy like him".

yes. i'm hot. i know i'm hot. and yes, i'm too good to ever willingly have sex with a guy like him.

>IF you did get raped, then i'm sorry.

i was raped. do you want me to describe what it felt like? it hurt like i was being stabbed when he forced himself into me. i was a virgin and completely dry. i felt so horrible each time i felt him push it into me. over and over again. i could feel my organs moving when he did it, i felt so violated knowing that part of him was inside my body. he said he was going to cum inside of me and i begged him not to because i didnt want to get pregnant. the first time he didn't but eventually he did anyway. on the way home i remember how wet it felt between my legs and i could feel liquid dripping down my leg. i remember how much i hated that feeling. tickling my leg. knowing what it was, that it ment i had been used like a piece of flesh. i remember trying to wash myself after but i never felt clean. at least i never got pregnant.

>a good majority of us would never rape a girl.

i'm glad thats the case. but there are plenty of men out there who would. like the one who raped me. and when i confessed what happened to me to two other girls, they admitted it had happened to them as well. one at a party. the other by her supposed bf. i guess we all became targets because of our looks so its the bad side of being a good looking girl.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 02:38:37 b82d39 No.3828

>>3826

>yes i was stupid, not a genius. but not stupid anymore. you can't see my face in the pic. lisa is obviously not my real name. i'm even using tor so you can't track me down by my ip address.

No, now you're just being outright paranoid.

>yes everyone. when i was chatting to him, i sent him the emails of some guys at school that had been harassing me, he said he'd scare them away. he threatened to send my pics to those guys. i know they would have let everyone in school see them.

How'd he have that information?

>explicit account of getting raped

Did you really have to do that just because the other poster was being a douche? Really didn't need to see that. It was crazy depressing.

>i'm glad thats the case. but there are plenty of men out there who would. like the one who raped me. and when i confessed what happened to me to two other girls, they admitted it had happened to them as well. one at a party. the other by her supposed bf. i guess we all became targets because of our looks so its the bad side of being a good looking girl.

That's but an unfortunate coincidence. Still makes me fucking sick, though.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 03:17:20 ef42b0 No.3829

>>3826

>but it wasn't really him.

Well, bet that taught you to verify who you're talking to huh?

>yes. i'm hot. i know i'm hot.

And conceited also.

Your description of the "rape" fits every scenario ever told of a person being raped.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 03:29:51 b82d39 No.3830

>>3829

Why you wanna be so condescending, dawg?

MrMisanthropist 09/20/15 (Sun) 03:32:39 327fb2 No.3831

Nothing new. But it still doesn't make it right to fuck 13 year old girls when we are adults. And really, while they look hot as hell, dealing with teenage drama is… yeah.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 03:40:06 b82d39 No.3832

>>3831

It's perfectly fine to fuck a 13yo girl out of LOVE, faggot. Obviously not to rape her.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 05:59:49 807190 No.3834

>>3830

Because I honestly still believe it's a troll.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 06:03:31 b82d39 No.3835

>>3834

What reason would a sexy-ass hottie have to troll in such a way?

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 07:51:36 4b5695 No.3840

>>3817

That ID number

Yeah, I'd rather not fuck a girl if the only other option was rape.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 13:45:03 a417ab No.3845

>>3835

Oh, I don't know. Boredom maybe? How did a "sexy-ass hottie" just "happen" to find this board? Why do "her" posts sound contrived and full of stereotypes?

>40yo fat, ugly pedo

>"hot" 13yo girl

>internet predator

>said he'd tell her friends

>"blackmailed"

It just sounds made up

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 19:07:52 4b5695 No.3852

>>3845

And the part about feeling her organs being pushed around

Wtf

Obv fake bs story

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 22:00:34 54a010 No.3854

>>3852

Yes, every part of the post sounds made up. Trying to perpetuate the stereotype that pedophiles are rapists.

Anonymous 09/21/15 (Mon) 01:17:11 b82d39 No.3859

>>3852

Are you female? Have you taken an adult man's cock at thirteen? Human organs shift around all the time in normal activity. I have no doubt that a dick can do the same.

>>3854

She's posted more than just now. She clearly isn't just some anti scumbag off the street. Seems she's trying to learn and grow here.

Anonymous 09/21/15 (Mon) 04:07:39 14ce8d No.3863

>>3859

>whiteknight's for an obv troll

>how gullible

Anonymous 09/21/15 (Mon) 05:49:40 b82d39 No.3865

>>3863

Now you're bordering on shitposting. My opinion differing from yours doesn't make me a white knight. Let's just wait for our sexy new female friend to post again, shall we?

lisa 09/21/15 (Mon) 14:15:11 000000 No.3872

>>3828

>No, now you're just being outright paranoid.

why dont you go get yourself raped then and still tell me i'm being paranoid

>How'd he have that information?

didnt you read what i said?? i gave him their emails so that he could threaten them and get them to leave me alone. of course it backfired on me badly.

>It was crazy depressing.

at least you don't have to actually have memories of it happening to you.

>That's but an unfortunate coincidence.

maybe. but im starting to think that rape is more common then most people think. of course most girls aren't going to announce to the world that it happened to them. i didn't. i didn't want to be known as the 'rape girl' in school. and everyone probably would have just said its my fault anyway.

>>3829

>Well, bet that taught you to verify who you're talking to huh?

yes it did. but i already admitted i was stupid.

>>3835

>How did a "sexy-ass hottie" just "happen" to find this board?

how did YOU find this board? it's not like its secret is it? ok maybe i didnt stumble on this by accident… i heard about the 'lawless' 8chan from the news, it sounded like the kind of place where people would talk about things like this. the link to 8chan is on wikipedia. /phile/ is one of the boards that comes up when you search for 'young' from the main page. and it seems to be one about teenage girls instead of children (which is just sick).

>It just sounds made up

fine, you dont have to believe me. i'm happy talking to the others that do believe me.

>>3852

>And the part about feeling her organs being pushed around

well, that's what i remember it felt like. what else can i say?

>>3854

>Trying to perpetuate the stereotype that pedophiles are rapists.

well, if they have sex with children before puberty then yes they are rapists. i guess having sex with a teenager isn't such a big deal if she consents to it. its not like we cant make our own decisions. its good to hear most of you here wouldn't rape a girl, but some men would. and of course they prefer to target young girls because they find us sexually attractive (all those stats at the beginning of this topic) and we are more vulnerable and easy to manipulate. like i was.

anyway, thanks to those of you who answered my question. i was starting to think that most men would be willing to harm a girl to get what they wanted but i guess not, you guys have no reason to lie on this board. but all i can say is that there are SOME men out there who would rape, and they can cause a lot of harm to girls like me. and its not easy for a girl to know who to trust.

i can stick around if any of you want me to. but i dont know really know what else we could talk about.

Anonymous 09/21/15 (Mon) 16:31:18 b9a01a No.3877

>>3872

>why dont you go get yourself raped then and still tell me i'm being paranoid

I'm the one who wasn't being a dick to you. That's not called for. Look, nobody here is going to rape you. We're all friends here.

>i heard about the 'lawless' 8chan from the news, it sounded like the kind of place where people would talk about things like this.

>8chan on the news

Top kek. Hilarious.

>the link to 8chan is on wikipedia. /phile/ is one of the boards that comes up when you search for 'young' from the main page. and it seems to be one about teenage girls instead of children

Yeah, personally, the extreme paedofags annoy me a lot. 10-year-olds, okay. 6-year-olds? Get the hell out.

>well, if they have sex with children before puberty then yes they are rapists.

Consensual sex with a girl near puberty who understands what she's doing is fine. You really can't call that rape. Again, huge difference between six and ten.

>i can stick around if any of you want me to. but i dont know really know what else we could talk about.

Please do. Would love to get to know you more. And since we have a nice range of discussion topics, as well as multimedia content designed for a broad audience, there's plenty to discuss.

Anonymous 09/22/15 (Tue) 05:16:05 292c8b No.3896

>>3877

>Yeah, personally, the extreme paedofags annoy me a lot. 10-year-olds, okay. 6-year-olds? Get the hell out.

Oh goody, another "I'm better than you cuz I like immature 10yo girls and you like immature 6yo girls".

>>3872

>how did YOU find this board?

I purposely searched for pedo related boards on 8ch.

>ok maybe i didnt stumble on this by accident

Admitting to a lie…Way to gain trust and have us believe your story is real.

>and it seems to be one about teenage girls instead of children

Actually, that would be /hebe/ Most of us on this forum are more interested in preteen girls than girls that have reached puberty. (But that's "sick" according to you).

And sorry, but every one of your posts so far have mentioned stereotypical descriptions of what people think pedo's are/do. (rape, target, manipulate, fat, etc)

But hey, you have fun perpetuating the stereotypes and playing with the ones that will bite the bait.

Anon…OUT

Anonymous 09/22/15 (Tue) 17:50:02 b82d39 No.3903

>>3896

>Actually, that would be /hebe/ Most of us on this forum are more interested in preteen girls than girls that have reached puberty.

Wrong on both counts. It's more likely the other way around.

As for the rest of your inane post, stereotypes are true sometimes. The stereotypical evil predators do still exist, it doesn't matter that their numbers have been inflated by the retarded moral panic that started in the 90s.

lisa 09/24/15 (Thu) 09:47:29 000000 No.3937

>>3877

>Please do. Would love to get to know you more.

Okay, I'll come here occasionally over the next few weeks to see if theres anything happening that interests me.

I guess if people want to get to know me, I could answer some questions. I'll answer any that don't make me too uncomfortable.

Maybe we should start a new topic rather than continuing this one?

Anonymous 09/24/15 (Thu) 18:21:57 b82d39 No.3942

>>3937

Yeah, it would probably be a good idea for you to go ahead and make a thread.

Anonymous 09/26/15 (Sat) 18:01:27 149086 No.3967

>>3859

The female body shifts organs more often than males. For example gemale organs shift during pregnancy. You are correct. I wish more MAPs understood the female body rather than pretend that they can't accidentally harm/mess up a girl's I had a MAP who is sexually interested in 8-12 exclusively told me that because a female has the ability to give birth that she can't be hurt by a penis in her vagina unless she was having rough sex. Really??? Wow. If this asshole even talked to girls he would see that this is completely false.

Anonymous 09/29/15 (Tue) 04:09:42 7156a7 No.4009

>>3967

A 12 year old girl can take a cock without any inconvenient. Perhaps you, should get a map and talk with girls.

lisa's thread lisa 09/29/15 (Tue) 04:44:10 000000 No.4011

File: 1443501850132.jpg (114.32 KB, 646x979, 646:979, 6756929120.jpg)

it's me lisa again.

this is a new thread for anyone that wants to talk with me.

i also decided to take another pic so you know im sincere. this is the all im willing to show.

sorry the notes is not very clear. i have an email imlisa at yandex com.

lisa 09/29/15 (Tue) 04:50:02 000000 No.4014

>>4011

oops posted this in the wrong place

the thread is at /phile/4012

Anonymous 10/01/15 (Thu) 15:57:22 ec6268 No.4085

>>4014

Never mind that. How the hell can your ID be 000000?

Anonymous 10/01/15 (Thu) 19:02:25 b82d39 No.4086

>>4085

All Tox users get that ID.

Anonymous 10/03/15 (Sat) 13:54:29 511d1f No.4178

nobody cares about pedophilia is natural desire or not.

anger is natural desire too, but if you punch people in the face, you will be arrested

Anonymous 10/03/15 (Sat) 14:07:58 511d1f No.4179

pedophilia is basically constructed in society as innapropriate behaviour (like homosexualism some years ago) by some activists. and there is no other reasons why people hate pedo.

if you break one argument against pedo, people pick up second etc.

Anonymous 10/08/15 (Thu) 21:01:19 803b0c No.4283

File: 1444338079522-0.png (718.02 KB, 1252x713, 1252:713, 9to10.PNG)

File: 1444338079523-1.png (18.23 KB, 812x97, 812:97, 20yo11yoFb.PNG)

File: 1444338079523-2.png (636.56 KB, 1182x708, 197:118, BLafgh.PNG)

File: 1444338079523-3.png (599.66 KB, 1201x592, 1201:592, u18.PNG)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FBUEfdPDOQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFlKQ48NsC4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHH8ktFC1GM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0rWNp5kMBc

Anonymous 10/08/15 (Thu) 21:04:55 803b0c No.4284

File: 1444338295163-0.png (459.93 KB, 1140x623, 1140:623, i died.PNG)

File: 1444338295164-1.png (63.66 KB, 232x199, 232:199, icantbreath.PNG)

Anonymous 10/09/15 (Fri) 10:17:44 b82d39 No.4301

>>4283

Don't just post links with no descriptions of what lies within.

Anonymous 10/09/15 (Fri) 23:32:14 88d916 No.4313

>>4301

it was just to give source on the screencaps

Anonymous 10/12/15 (Mon) 05:34:14 1f7497 No.4366

File: 1444628054571.jpg (52.02 KB, 491x490, 491:490, 1.jpg)

Video is titled "5 Shocking Sexual Traditions From Around The World"

I quote:

"Kids here start having sex as young as 6 to 8 years old for girls and about 10 to 12 for boys […]."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfWhDQzWY-I

Anyone first hand source on that?

Sunshine, palm trees, free land, and a island full of pedos Anonymous 10/21/15 (Wed) 20:48:26 effde2 No.4514

Lets all move to Pitcairn… http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/pitcairnislands/11418280/Why-will-nobody-move-to-Pitcairn-the-Pacific-island-with-free-land.html

Anonymous 10/24/15 (Sat) 20:06:40 c8ded4 No.4540

File: 1445717200776.jpg (315.64 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 41.jpg)

>>6

I just wanted to quickly pop in and say that i really want to fuck RyRy during her loli years.

Anonymous 11/02/15 (Mon) 03:25:11 000000 No.4614

>>79

If we are talking about a society where promiscuity is the norm, I agree, we should put off sex untill people are less impulsive and know more to be able to make their own decisions so as to deal with all the heart-break and so forth.

BTW we also know that life-outcome isn't dependent on parenting to a significant degree. Unless you abuse your children the genes are what matter. Further, extended families are an option (that probably works better) to the modern invention of nuclear family.

Anonymous 11/02/15 (Mon) 03:45:14 000000 No.4615

>>4614

If marriage was the norm though, actual marriage, marriage as the definition of sexual consent (and with some sort of age limit), an actual contract that could not at all easily be broken, and something seen as healthy and celebrated, I don't think there is as much for people "to deal with".

Anonymous 11/16/15 (Mon) 00:50:32 892ed3 No.4799

>>4009

>>Perhaps you, should get a map and talk with girls.

Perhaps you should talk to a gynecologist or two. In case you are super retarded a gynecologist is a doctor for the female reproductive system. There are mature women who have trouble taking a penis vaginally. The issue primarily is the distance between the vagina opening and the cervix. For younger females it tends to be is shorter. If the penis hits the cervix it can cause pain, bruises and bleeding. This can be worsen by certain positions (doggy style) because certain positions penetrate deeper. Your claim is false, it varies from female to female with the factor of penis size.

Anonymous 11/16/15 (Mon) 19:34:56 000000 No.4820

i'm an outsider to this topic since i am a girl and do not have any preferences towards younger teens but i still just wanted to say that there r people who actualy understand and care. society and gov r doing a crappy job when it comes to this topic it's not like it's anyones choice who they develop certain feelibngs for i get that. but most people don't. they just hate without spending a minute thinking about it. so in my opinion coming out is the only thing that can be done to make this numb world think. and it has to b done by as many as possible to create more than just a minority that can b ignored.

ps: sending love to all of u ppl <3

Anonymous 11/17/15 (Tue) 05:41:57 cde143 No.4823

>>4820

>i am a girl

>sending love to all of u ppl

To hell with love

send us nude pics of yourself

kidding!!

Anonymous 11/17/15 (Tue) 22:09:02 b82d39 No.4835

>>4820

Wanna be on the Audio/phile/s Podcast?

Anonymous 11/18/15 (Wed) 04:23:14 cdeadd No.4843

>>4820

How old are you? People still call adult women girls.

Anonymous 11/18/15 (Wed) 13:12:44 000000 No.4851

sure why not? :)

Anonymous 11/18/15 (Wed) 13:14:30 000000 No.4852

>>4843

17 so yeah i'm underage

Anonymous 11/18/15 (Wed) 16:45:52 a85748 No.4856

>>4852

Not that much underage. You almost an adult and above the age of consent.

Anonymous 11/18/15 (Wed) 18:27:03 b82d39 No.4857

>>4851

>>4852

Haha, swag. How should I contact you?

>>4856

Don't know how old YOU are, anon, but to some of us, that's still really good.

Anonymous 11/18/15 (Wed) 22:31:49 d1705d No.4858

>>4857

You are telling me you can't talk to 18 yr old in real life? I could see if she was 16 or younger but she is going to be an adult anyway. If you are attracted to legal age why meet someone online?

Anonymous 11/19/15 (Thu) 04:02:10 b82d39 No.4862

>>4858

>You are telling me you can't talk to 18 yr old in real life?

Correct. I go to a college with almost no cute looking girls, and the average, or maybe median, age of new students here each semester is 24 or some bullshit like that. Most of the girls fresh out of high school don't come here.

>I could see if she was 16 or younger but she is going to be an adult anyway.

Huge difference between in high school, just out of high school, and used to college.

>If you are attracted to legal age why meet someone online?

Uh, I'm not trying to "meet someone" here in that respect. I'm trying to gain some ground in repairing a broken podcast, and expanding my range of female acquaintances. The more girls I'm talking to the better.

Anonymous 11/19/15 (Thu) 16:23:11 ae5566 No.4869

>>4862

>>Correct. I go to a college with almost no cute looking girls, and the average, or maybe median, age of new students here each semester is 24 or some bullshit like that. Most of the girls fresh out of high school don't come here.

You sound like you have crazy high standards. No offense but I doubt you are that handsome to be downing a whole population of women. How do you know this girl is cute? What kind of college do you go to???? My college has nothing but people under 20. Then again I'm undergrad maybe you are in graduate school. Are you not attracted to women in their 20's? are you more exclusive?

>>Huge difference between in high school, just out of high school, and used to college.

It depends. I know some kids who never got past their high school selves. Are you looking for more immature girls vs mature women? Are you not interested in girls who want to go to college?

>>Uh, I'm not trying to "meet someone" here in that respect. I'm trying to gain some ground in repairing a broken podcast, and expanding my range of female acquaintances. The more girls I'm talking to the better.

I see. Are you looking for females who are attracted to underage kids as well or just looking for girls?

Anonymous 11/20/15 (Fri) 11:57:02 b82d39 No.4875

>>4869

>You sound like you have crazy high standards.

I do.

>No offense but I doubt you are that handsome to be downing a whole population of women.

I pretty much almost have light novel protagonist powers.

>How do you know this girl is cute?

I don't. Who cares?

>What kind of college do you go to???? My college has nothing but people under 20. Then again I'm undergrad maybe you are in graduate school.

It's a cheap two-year one.

>Are you not attracted to women in their 20's? are you more exclusive?

Correct.

>>4869

>It depends. I know some kids who never got past their high school selves. Are you looking for more immature girls vs mature women? Are you not interested in girls who want to go to college?

where would you get that idea from? I don't care if a girl wants to go to college, I care that she's a girl.

>I see. Are you looking for females who are attracted to underage kids as well or just looking for girls?

Either way is fine.

Anonymous 11/25/15 (Wed) 20:45:15 000000 No.4927

http://oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/phile/res/6.html#q4011

If this really is a picture of you, take a photo in the exact same spot–same counter top, rug, shower door, pink wall, but without you in the photo and post that.

Anonymous 11/26/15 (Thu) 08:06:06 b82d39 No.4929

>>4927

You're too late, man. She's gone. They always freaking leave…

Anonymous 12/16/15 (Wed) 07:04:33 8bb5e4 No.5146

File: 1450249473449.jpg (196.45 KB, 500x693, 500:693, ssuyy.jpg)

HC anything>>

Anonymous 12/16/15 (Wed) 20:39:43 d5f3c2 No.5147

>>5146

Fotoshop dis little SLUT

hard core hebe

Anonymous 12/23/15 (Wed) 03:15:24 637512 No.5202

>>5146

Mods some weird shi

Anonymous 12/24/15 (Thu) 08:55:11 18b299 No.5215

>>889

obviously past 18 though

Ano no no no 01/09/16 (Sat) 19:03:45 3c0559 No.5360

We could start with GOD, YES GOD ….after a few thousand years of breeding from an incestous pair and their offspring, aka Adam, eve, cain, abel and whatever their sister's name was…God decides ..hmmmm I need a son to help with the message but I need to find a suitable girl to carry my child GABRIEL go find a young virgin to carry my son …Gabriel eventually finds a cute 12 yr old girl called Mary who is willing to be the special one (but must not tell anyone) he tells her god will visit her…we all know that one!! Well meantime she hooks up with a carpenter, Joseph who cares for her and becomes her husband but does not consummate their joining together because mary tells him she has been visited by a host and is now carrying a special child. SHE WAS 12!! and maybe 13 and a bit when Jesus was born …so obviously this makes GOD a pedo and gabriel an accessory to the fact ….so now no-one should feel guilty because the divine host ,spirit or lord that every Judge, senator, president, queen, king lawyer etc etc has sworn oaths by is a PEDO and they also are guilty by association and unfit to judge or pass judgement on any person doing the same !!!….Its just my take on religion, the law and its administrators …RANT OVER