[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/philosophy/ - Philosophy

Start with the Greeks

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next Beta period has started, click here for info or go directly to beta.8ch.net
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 2 per post.


Sister Boards [ Christ ] [ Politics ]

File: 1448708039892.jpg (86.3 KB, 614x438, 307:219, Book_cover_Beyond_Freedom_….jpg)

265a64 No.2574

" Behaviorism (or behaviourism) is an approach to psychology that focuses on an individual's behavior. It combines elements of philosophy, methodology, and psychological theory. It emerged in the early twentieth century as a reaction to depth psychology and other more traditional forms of psychology, which often had difficulty making predictions that could be tested using rigorous experimental methods. The primary tenet of methodological behaviorism, as expressed in the writings of John B. Watson and others, is that psychology should have only concerned itself with observable events. Behaviorist philosophies shifted somewhat during the 1940s and 1950s and again since the 1980s. Radical behaviorism is a conceptual variant purposed by B. F. Skinner that acknowledges the presence of private events—including cognition and emotions—and suggests that they are subject to the same controlling variables as are observable behaviors. " -Wikipedia

Some of the contents of B.F. Skinner's book Beyond Freedom and Dignity expresses behaviorist ideas, this is criticized by Noam Chomsky as unscientific, is he right? I ask because I wanted to read said book.

e16723 No.2581

idk. i'm unfamiliar with the book.


265a64 No.2649

Bump


265a64 No.2744

Nobody?


138419 No.2746

>>2744

Read the fucking book and understand it yourself you lazy bastard. If you're actually serious about understanding an idea, reading the source is exactly the first thing to do. You don't not read it and then go ask about critiques BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO BACKGROUND IN WHAT IS BEING CRITIQUED AND AS SUCH HAVE NO UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS A GOOD CRITIQUE AND WHAT IS NOT.


265a64 No.2768

>>2746

>>2746

>>2746

I rather just have somebody tell me why Chomsky made the comment, and what it might be based off off.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]