How do i reference plato

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 1 per post.

File: 1411465153612.jpg (9.06 KB, 208x300, 52:75, completeworks.jpg)

How do i reference plato Anonymous 09/23/14 (Tue) 09:39:13 No.66

I am struggling with a particular excerpt. how do i reference to you, the part of the text with which i am having trouble? Merely copying and pasting it seems crass.

there are numbers and letters like [a] [2] peppered throughout the text, i have an inclination these are part of how something shoud be done, but i do not see the lines that join the dots

Picture related is the text i am working from

Anonymous 09/23/14 (Tue) 10:24:04 No.69

You simply suck sweet athenian cocks

Anonymous 09/23/14 (Tue) 12:53:02 No.78

>>66
Dialogue, Book I-X: Lines
>eg Repubic, Book XIII: 666d-696f

Anonymous 09/24/14 (Wed) 06:50:25 No.123

>>78
Thank you. It took me a whiule opf rereading and comparing to finally realise that there's a difference between a "page" of plato's original work, and a "page" in the e-book i'm reading based on it's layout.

So my problem is Euthyphro, Book I, 10d - 11c
Socrates startes to talk seperately about loved and god-loved, but i don't understand why, which non-gods are doing the loving ? I thought we had established that the pious is what is loved by all the gods at this point, i struggle to comprehend his arguments from there

can someone explain his argument to me in a differnt phrasing perhaps, to help me understand how piety is disproven?

Anonymous 09/24/14 (Wed) 09:17:25 No.127

>>123

at the moment i've mostly managed to move beyond it, and am onto fear and shame now, but i fdo not feel i entirely understood the argument socrates put forward, which euthyphro criticaised as ideas moving around and refusing to stay where established, can anyone give some insight into it?