[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/pn/ - Politics and News

The hide post feature is your friend

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


You won't get banned for your opinion
Politics Opinion World Financial Odd Boards Religion Science Technology Entertainment

File: 1431669895742.jpg (49.3 KB, 620x413, 620:413, stephen-hawking-100584969-….jpg)

 No.446

http://www.computerworld.com/article/2922442/robotics/stephen-hawking-fears-robots-could-take-over-in-100-years.html

Worried that one day we'll have robot overlords? You're in good company. Renowned physicist, cosmologist and author of A Brief History of Time, Stephen Hawking said this week that robots, powered by artificial intelligence (A.I.), could overtake humans in the next 100 years.

Speaking at the Zeitgeist conference in London, Hawking said: "Computers will overtake humans with AI at some within the next 100 years. When that happens, we need to make sure the computers have goals aligned with ours," according to a report in Geek. In an interview with the BBC Hawking said A.I. poses no threat to the human race today but could in the future as machines – specifically robots – become smarter, bigger and stronger than their human developers. "It would take off on its own, and re-design itself at an ever-increasing rate," Hawking said at the time. "Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete, and would be superseded."

Not all tech people and scientists are as concerned about A.I. as Hawking and Musk seem to be, though. A lot of people tend to think of A.I. as the brains behind robotics. But it also powers smartphones, email spam filters and apps that make restaurant recommendations. A.I. is a long way away from creating a robot that easily can learn and is self-aware enough to cast its human operators aside and take over the world. And talk about these fears runs the risk of slowing down AI research, some have worried.

 No.451

100 years? In that case I say let the robots take over.


 No.452

File: 1431675577070.jpg (20.17 KB, 600x400, 3:2, 1429857394248-0.jpg)

>>451

Keep in mind that he could be wrong in the timescale. Any event in the near future could precipitate a massive increase in A.I. capability. For example, development during a war or even an accidental discovery in a lab somewhere. Granted, the second event is somewhat unlikely but has happened before-penicillin for instance. And we all know what the Second World War gave us and even then we were barely able to prevent it from killing us all. And that's when such things were in human hands!

I would be even more pessimistic than Mr. Hawking. I give it three decades before something happens, either for the worse or not


 No.453

the comments on that gave me a headache


 No.478

>>453

There's a lot of stupid everywhere


 No.499

>>446

>AI recognizes the merchant as humanity's biggest issue

>???

>oy vey


 No.678

too late, archons' slave

you pushed their agenda all your life, it's too late to whine to buy yourself a secure afterlife now


 No.680

File: 1432216333034.png (104.2 KB, 1034x549, 1034:549, ben garrison 1385747431512….png)

>>446

>A.I. is a long way away

no it's not

it's already there, only you wont hear about it

they wouldnt mention it otherwize especially in these alarmist terms

unofficial tech is tens if not hundreds of years ahead




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]