[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/pn/ - Politics and News

The hide post feature is your friend

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


You won't get banned for your opinion
Politics Opinion World Financial Odd Boards Religion Science Technology Entertainment

File: 1432023893841.jpg (120.82 KB, 630x419, 630:419, web 1.17581 Asilomar-Confe….jpg)

 No.590

http://www.nature.com/news/us-science-academies-take-on-human-genome-editing-1.17581

The US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) and National Academy of Medicine (NAM) will launch a major initiative to develop guidelines for editing human genomes, they said on 18 May. The initiative follows the April announcement that researchers had used a gene editing system called CRISPR-Cas9 to remove a mutated gene from a human embryo. The work involved a small number of embryos and was only partially successful, but it has sparked wide debate about the ethics of editing human genomes in ways that can be passed on to future generations.

While researchers and ethicists disagree on whether such research should continue, most agree that its ethical and legal ramifications should be discussed further before a modified embryo is implanted into a human. Many countries ban human germline editing outright. The United States forbids the use of federal funds for such research, although it is legal in most US states.

The science academies' initiative will hold an international summit this fall, including scientists, ethicists, patient groups and others yet to be determined. The academies will also establish a working group to study the ethical, legal, social and scientific issues involved in germline editing and develop a consensus statement on the practice. A separate advisory committee will be appointed to guide future decision-making. An NAS spokesperson says that the academies expect to announce the members of these committees in coming months.

 No.945

we are far from realizing anything functional from this research and we do need to get it done

ethics against this is simply anti science




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]