[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/pn/ - Politics and News

The hide post feature is your friend

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
Click here to find out if your antivirus software sucks!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


You won't get banned for your opinion
Politics Opinion World Financial Odd Boards Religion Science Technology Entertainment

File: 1432088742191.jpg (206.36 KB, 600x450, 4:3, gavel.jpg)

 No.608

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/53851/20150519/appeals-court-rules-samsung-copied-apples-iphone-designs-patents-apple.htm

Samsung may not end up having to pay the entire $930 million in damages awarded to Apple in a 2013 patent case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has found that the California court that handled the case may have to reconsider up to $382 million of that money. The case was filed by Apple in 2011, with the company accusing Samsung of copying a number of patents related to the design of its smartphones. Apple won the trial in 2012, and was awarded a whopping $1.05 billion. In 2013, the courts took off $450.5 million from those damages, but awarded Apple an extra $290.5 million later in the year. In the end, the total came to $930 million.

As was expected, Samsung appealed the decision. The court of appeals has found that while the patents related to design were infringed upon, those related to trade dress – how products are packaged and presented – were not. "We therefore vacate the jury's damages awards against the Samsung products that were found liable for trade dress dilution and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion," reads the ruling from the court of appeals.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]