/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

The role of the GOP has always been to draw a line in the sand. Then when libs step over it, draw another line in the sand.

>>10330482

I'm well aware. Instead of simply complaining about it, I suggest taking the offensive.

As I said, we've got just a bit over a year until they have to turn to us, or at least, to their constituents. What can/should be done about their horrendous fucking behavior, both presently and historically?

This is not my arena, but I can see as well as anyone with some degree of strategic thinking that if we want to start laying the groundwork for a counter-offensive, now would be the time to begin pursuing such actively.

We all know the GOP is shit, cannot be trusted, is forever tainted, and must go.

… But what can/should we do to spur that on and prepare an alternative/replacement which serves our interests?

They wrote "all men" are created equal, which crazy commies determine to be all races and women. However, as shown in their lives this was not the case as they owned slaves and expected women to work in the house.

>>10330492

You're rather blatantly ignoring the fact that, as demonstrated in the graphic, the very same men very shortly after wrote that to be a citizen you had to be White. Conceptually, this creates extreme and immediate conflict.

However, as you say, grazy gommies propose otherwise… In any case, it has little to do with the present prospect of dethroning the entirely-kosher right arm of the American political beast in favor of an arm that serves our interests.

>>10330508

Good point, yeah it's pretty obvious the intent. We're going to have to strategically staff all offices of government with friendlies under the moniker of 'R' or 'D'. sleeper cells if you will

Then preparing an array of bills that would 'reset' the nation, then get them through back-to-back over the course of about a week, waiving all procedural rules.

Essentially we have to ensure there's hard right wing people running for congress in 2018 and 2020 in these districts of RINOs and Dems and make a mass campaign for people to support the closest things we have to ourguys. America is tired of cuckservatives and we need to organize something like a tea party 2.0 to get the hard right in office. The people are ready for it.

>>10330476

I always explain to people, white black women or otherwise, that this country and its laws were meant for white people.

You can take your christcuck shilling up your ass tho

They're pushing for Russian war to make the goy stop looking at their handlers.

Many things could have happened in order to promote a peaceful outcome - many resources made, many candidates ruthlessly criticized from the right. But, none of that happened.

Anyway, you know what needs to be done. Everyone knows what needs to be done, if they have the same goals.

>>10330482

aka looney toons politics

>>10330566

>You can take your christcuck shilling up your ass tho

I believe the intent is not to 'shill' for Christianity, but rather, to demonstrate that Jews and Jews alone were, for some reason, allowed by the British to become citizens without affirming a Christian faith.

>>10330592

>They're pushing for Russian war to make the goy stop looking at their handlers.

Indeed.

>Many things could have happened in order to promote a peaceful outcome - many resources made, many candidates ruthlessly criticized from the right. But, none of that happened.

Now is the opportunity to make serious headway towards inhibiting these peoples efforts and putting them on the defensive.

>Anyway, you know what needs to be done. Everyone knows what needs to be done, if they have the same goals.

That option is not currently available for deployment, thus we have to make use of what we have.

Are people still susceptible to the term Cuckservative? If so, we could begin by looking at the cucks up for election in 2018 and making infographics for normalfags who vote republican, and distributing them to poison their chances at re-election. If an alternative can be pushed, even better.

Ultimately democracy will never solve our problems, but we can at least give ourselves more time.

>>10330612

I would suggest they are still susceptible to that term, yes, but it has lost quite a bit of its bite - we could use some new generalized anti-cuckservative attack memetics in development. I'll consider making a thread in that capacity in the future. A good thought.

Best case scenario would employ a two-pronged approach.

We can't just attack the GOP, all it'll do is split the right-wing vote, and then the Dems have the advantage, and that's really no better.

What we need to do is punish the traitors AND defeat the enemy - one alone will not suffice.

So, we have to not only prepare a repetoire of attack-memes upon the GOP candidates, while identifying and promoting on behalf of viable alternative candidates; we also need to be employing attack memetics against our opposition, as well as, I would suggest, a platform of promotion on behalf of pet-issue fringe candidates of the left.

IOW: We need to hammer at the cuckservatives, whilst promoting a viable right-wing alternative that serves our interests; and we need to hammer at the democucks, whilst promoting one or more left-wing candidates that will only appeal to a small segment of their base, but will do so strongly.

PHASE 1

Step 1: We need to clearly identify who is up for re-election that requires targeting from the cuckservative pool.

Step 2: Establishment of background material for attack-memes directed at those target candidates

Step 3: Identify viable alternatives that can pull a large segment of the vote without extreme schisming within the base

Step 4: Establishment of background material for support-memes directed as our alternative candidates

PHASE 2

Step 1: We need to clearly identify who is up for re-election that requires targeting from the democuck pool

Step 2: Establishment of background material for attack-memes directed at those target candidates

Step 3: Identify viable alternatives that can/will generate extreme schisming within the base, specifically by identifying with/drawing votes from one or more of the minority/fringe issue voter pools and not the others

Step 4: Establishment of background material for support-memes directed as our alternative candidates

Thoughts/suggestsions - from everyone - as regards this methodology as a foundation?

bump

Neo-cons and their (((d))) counterparts should be a major target. Many of the Cucks in office sway whichever way the political wind is blowing. This and destroy ideologues on the (((left))).

Lots of radical dems have connections to communists that can be exploited. All of our enemies have financial connections to the jew lobbyist orgs. Exposing the (((foreign))) influence on our elections could be a good approach.

bump

bump

The GOP prefers to be the minority party, honestly. Their ineptness and fraud become all too apparent when they don't have the Democrats to blame for being pathetic.

This thread is actually relevant since Charlottesville.

The constitution was always /ourdocument/.