CULTURAL MARXISM IS REAL
There are those who claim Cultural Marxism is a conspiracy theory. Lets prove them wrong
Just found this quote from neomarxist theoretician Michel Foucault, who according to (((academia))) is just a philosopher and literary critic. His neomarxist theories are just harmless sociology, and according to wikipedia you are a conspiracy theorist for believing there is a coordinated attack against the West. However, lets hear it from the man himself:
>"The fundamental codes of a culture gobern its language, its perception, its exchanges, its techniques, its values and its hierarchy of practices. To such a system of power we can only proceed forward through a process of change, expressed in an strategic and systemic task of demolition or deconstruction of the western cultural system (Abbau in Heiddeger).
(…)
>If the basis of power is the production of knowledge, all forma of knowledge constitutes a form of power. Therefore, values are a tool of political struggle."
-Michel Foucault, neo-marxist theoretician, militant of maoist group "Proletarian Left"
What really is neomarxism then? It is the recodification of Marx, interpreted in a structuralist postmodern manner. If marxist XIXth century thought lead to a socialist dictatorships in the XXth century, then by all means neomarxist thought written by Frankfurt School on the XXth century will lead to a Postmodern neomarxist dictatorship in the XXIst century. While Marxist-Leninist thought used a Party structure and economic means to achieve power (expropiations, hunger to control population, etc), neomarxist thought (known as critical theory) will use other means to achieve it: culture. Culture literally means "what is cultivated". Well, what IS cultivated in our western civilization today by mass media and academia? Gender theory, interculturalism, postmodernism, etc. They are using these means to consolidate power, to topple western civilization, and establish their own regime. Their new regime will not be much similar to XX century socialist dictatorships, because they now possess stronger and more subtle weapons. Stalinism needed large ammounts of police and secret police to control the population. Cultural marxism does not need them so much, as the secret police is alegorically also inside your head. They dont need so much commisars in social media or in daily situations (which doesnt mean they do not have them either) because they make the people go around correcting THEMSELVES all wrongthink. The commisars' count on the fact that now your own friends could publicly denounce you for wrongthink and seek your exclusion from society. Or even guilt themselves for wrongthink! In the words of german veteran and writer Ernst Junger "their atrocity lies in dividing the individuality of man; now man is made to even confesse their own crimes to the regime in spite of their own safety…".
There are two interpretations of both Nietszche, Spengler and Heiddeger. The first interpretation is the historical one. This interpretation is the one made by Nationalsocialism. It basically interprets Nietsche as the basis for a new superman who will overcome the nihilsm and decline of the west to forge a new golden era; here, the death of God is symbolic of a West who killed its spiritual world, not literally advocating for the death of religion. Here Heiddeger is read as a man who warned against hypereality, and Spengler as a man who advocated for a last ditch effort to save Western civilization. Note that Nietzsche and his family were associated to Pan germanism, Heiddeger was an inscribed member of the Nazi party and Spengler was not only a teacher in the Prussian School system but also required reading in Nazi german universities.
Now these neomarxists reinterpret these three authors to suit their own ends. They read Nietzsche as a nihilist (in spite of what he thought himself) and use him to alienate men from their own nationa and beliefs. They use Heiddeger to deconstruct our notions of Time and Space, making up crap about how he was "a good philosopher but a bad nazi" and was "forced" to join the NSDAP when he made a free choice and it was not mandatory. They use Spengler to both proclaim the death of the West and the birth of a "new socialist civilization" and also as a kind of blueprint to systematize the decay. Jack Kerouac even has the nerve to literally proclaim the beat generation and the sexual revolution as "Spengler's second religiosity". Spengler warned that decadent civilizations turn into debauchery and decadence as a means to replace the emptyness they have for having lost their first, heroic, religiosity of their golden past. These so called critical theorists are deliberatly subverting our values to destroy our civilization.
Also, cultural marxist dump thread