681812 No.10377787
Found this article.
http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/08/salt_institute_defends_itself_against_sexism_by_invoking_a_sexist_metric.html
Look at her.
Just LOOK at her.
658c59 No.10377811
>>10377787
holy fucking shit that noose.
also op, you are a fucking faggot holy shit, if you don't know how to make threads, don't make them
5bd442 No.10377832
>Oy vey da truth is sexist goyim, you need us to tell you what's real!
The chutzpah, they never learn.
b564fd No.10377839
>>10377787
>evolutionary psychology is just the most obvious example of science's flaws
>evolutionary psychology
>Psychology
>science
ad6af4 No.10377872
>>10377787
>salt_institute
6dc345 No.10377885
So I'm guessing this author is also very skeptical of anthropomorphic climate change? Or does she selectively throw evidence under the bus for political purposes?
b564fd No.10377891
>>10377886
>there needs to be rules to do something on a fucking imageboard
Fuck off faggot
19b345 No.10377892
>>10377811
I hate faggots like this anon that think every OP needs to post a thread the same exact way. This is chan life bitch not a corporation. Fuck off
8c0312 No.10377908
>>10377891
Sage, then. Suck nigger dicks somewhere else, please. We have standards here. We’re not clicking on slate.
8c0312 No.10377911
>>10377892
>lol why are people saging
>it’s not like I put zero fucking effort into my thread or anything
b564fd No.10377917
>>10377908
>Jew writes an article
>n-no Goy, don't read it. It's from a non-approved website
80a06c No.10377927
>>10377917
Go back to cuckchan.
a8f278 No.10377932
>>10377917
Be sure to tell your uncle/pol/ when you figure out how everyone here knows that you don't belong.
95ec16 No.10377947
>>10377787
>Not copying the text here
>Slate cancer
>Not linking the correct story
OP IS A MASSIVE GIGANTIC FAGGOT!
9ae4fc No.10377948
681812 No.10377981
>>10377947
I shall learn.
I'm traumatized by the nose.
aab445 No.10378005
>>10377981
OP why can't you just follow the lurk for 3 years rule.
91a6eb No.10378072
>>10377787
>Jew4Pal
>#niggerandSTEM
>rainbow flag emoji
It's a nigger, a dyke, AND a kike. There's no oven hot enough for this fucking cunt.
ef8253 No.10378079
>>10377787
>that nose
Is it a photoshop ruse cuise or is it real ?
74ca20 No.10378094
>>10377892
We're more traditionalist here cunt, perhaps if you lurked more you would understand where you erred.
d28151 No.10378102
>>10377947
>It's 2017, and to some extent scientific literature still supports a patriarchal view
OY VEY! These filthy whites need to ignore scientific facts!
a8058c No.10378119
At first I was thinking that she was some sort of sociology focused person. Then I looked at her CV. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56dcce827da24f56fb1d2b31/t/581aa00a46c3c4492a2473b6/1478139914375/Prescod-Weinstein_CV_112.pdf
I though of why would someone with a PhD on Physics rambling such nonsense, but then I reached into this part.
ef8253 No.10378125
>>10378119
Wait, you can get a PhD in Physics by whining about niggers in science ?
1b9dfc No.10378142
>>10377787
>Just LOOK at her.
Jesus. Christ. Is that even edited pic?
4a1fd0 No.10378146
This kike is trying to maintain the idea of a concrete external objective reality while denying the best method we've figured out of interacting with an external reality (science).
I can see an argument to be made for "science =/= truth", if you're claiming that there is primacy in thought and consciousness and that "truth" is the correct method of going about achieving the state of being that you want to have. Truth could therefore be the way to internally restructure yourself to achieve the state of being that you want.
This kike is being self contradictory though, by putting primacy in the world that we are perceiving. If you accept an objective external reality and history - that there is external space filled with objects and that these objects have been in certain states at previous times - as being an unquestionable truth, than you can't deny evolutionary psychology. This is because the external world is mediated by sensory perception, and modelling observable phenomenon is the basis of science.
a8058c No.10378148
>>10378125
If it were so…
>PhD in Physics, University of Waterloo/Perimeter Institute, Canada, Dissertation: Cosmic Acceleration as Quantum Gravity Phenomenology
https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/5498/Prescod-Weinstein_Chanda.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Possibly that she did keep separated her professional and personal life. But not anymore as it looks.
4a1fd0 No.10378149
>>10377917
learn how to archive faggot
78a010 No.10378156
Slate are a bit of a joke, though. I'm not sure even normalfags think highly of them.
000000 No.10378178
>>10377787
>'If there is unequal outcome, there MUST have been unequal opportunity in the first place, the other possibility (that there is unequal ability) is impossible and unthinkable!'
And this woman talks about science?
83a7a5 No.10378192
>>10377787
(((science)))
(((truth)))
Right up there with (((logic is sexist)))>>10377787
83a7a5 No.10378197
>>10378119
>nigger physicists
>Hispanic physicists
We're dealing with an idiot who games the oppression olympics. Nuke from orbit.
000000 No.10378205
>>10378178
And then (in the other article) she has the nerve to say 'eliminate structural biases in education, health care, housing, and salaries that favour white men and see if we still fail'. AS LONG AS women and nonwhites fail (which is forever), they will shriek that there are 'biases'… somewhere. How else should they fail? It must be the white men's fault for oppressing the truth and obscuring those biases' existence.
It's not even worth it to point out the ways in which she committed appeals to ignorance and embraced ambiguous language, too, because every man will see those immediately and no woman will be able to understand it anyway.
33dc14 No.10378298
>>10377892
>chan life
I imagine you have a sticker like pic related on your mode of transportation.
9465da No.10378368
>nigger, Latino, Jewish, LGBT, 'successful' female physicist
If she got to where she was because of what was actually in her head she wouldn't feel the need to shout about all this bullshit. She didn't though. She was handed things the whole way up. If she weren't Jewish I'd say she might feel some guilt because she knows she doesn't deserve the life handed to her and is projecting in order to validate herself. Since she is Jewish though she legitimately thinks this is okay.
80a06c No.10378369
>>10378218
>muslims that low
The sandnigger team really has come a long ways recently.
e2407a No.10378379
e2407a No.10378383
>>10378376
-1/10 still would not bang
Notfixed.jpg
c3ebce No.10378384
>>10378376
>>10378336
How do you fuck up your genetic code that badly.
7e6789 No.10378404
>>10377886
Back on your belly, snake.
000000 No.10378422
>>10378368
Do you have any suggestions how to detect if a co-author of a scientific paper actually put thought into it and contributed to it or (s)he has just been added to the roster for diversity points? Any rules of thumb? Telling signs? I don't doubt that she's in the shittier echelons of her field, but I would like to have some proof.
000000 No.10378436
>>10378422
(I mean, other than the fact that her thesis begins with 'I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis' only to just a paragraph later say 'This dissertation is partially the product of collaborative research and co-authored publications.', because, ironic as that sounds, I understand that such claims and disclaims are simple academic formalities; I haven't read much theses myself.)
b96452 No.10378453
000000 No.10378463
>>10378436
(Although – excuse the tripleposting – the following emphasis (by me) is strikingly reminiscent to me of the Lovelace/Babbage relationship. Doing mechanical calculations based on someone else's ideas, hm?)
>The article with Afshordi and Balogh relies on prior work by Afshordi. It was Afshordi who first proposed we consider nigger holes in the presence of gravitational aether. MOST OF THE FUNDAMENTAL CALCULATIONS WERE DONE BY ME, and through this work, I made an unexpected discovery. This lead Afshordi and I to propose the Trans-Planckian ansatz. Balogh was asked to contribute an astrophysical perspective to the project. The written product was largely edited by Afshordi and myself and is based on a manuscript that I wrote during the research process. Revisions after the referee’s remarks were handled primarily by me, with input from Afshordi.
b82623 No.10378499
This is toothless kvetching. She's yelling into an echo chamber. The only people who read this crap are the "i fucking love science" crowd and their days are numbered. They all know it. The reason this kind of shit is from their side is to constant is because it is the final violent thrashing of someone who is about to die. It's instinct and nerves kicking in before the inevitable death.
We got the fish on the hook and out of the water. It's flopping about trying to get back in. Their days are numbered.
8dcd71 No.10378524
>>10378384
Fear not anon, this kike dyke will not procreate.
80a06c No.10378547
>>10378524
Is the bridesmaid a tranny? If so why does he look so disgusted?
8c0312 No.10378551
>>10377917
Hi, newfag. Sage for no archive.
4bd9a4 No.10378557
>>10378524
that one behind looks like a genuine ladyboy, no surprise if it's flfill bull role in such a progressive relationships.
1c1a5e No.10378558
>>10377892
Its not about rules its about culture you lazy fucking negro. Having a set way of doing things allows for identification of outsiders.
8dcd71 No.10378564
>>10378524
Just noticed, taken April 21st 2008.
←-This pic from 6th Febuary 2017.
This kike loves the rice niggers.
2b0a11 No.10378565
>>10378146
Science gets to physical truth, but it can't access/identify truths such as what is good and what is evil, right and wrong, justice and honour, god and fate etc.
It's an amazing physical tool that is unfortunately becoming a religion in the spiritually (((corrupted)) atheist/skeptic "community".
0743a1 No.10378573
>>10378564
>#niggerandasianlove
Wait… is she saying that she's nigger?
80a06c No.10378575
>>10378564
Nigger jews are arguably even worse than ashkenazi jews.
b82623 No.10378577
>>10378564
look at this gangly niggerkike and tell he honestly that jews aren't reptilian skinwalkers
d13691 No.10378579
>>10377892
>This is chan life bitch
and now i have the mental image of some fat autist slapping weebshit stickers on a 3k anodized glock.
2e2961 No.10378585
>>10377787
>Science doesn't equal truth goy
But Dr. Weinstein Sheckleburg, if science isn't the truth then that means all of the thesis and "studies" on transgenderism and homosexuality being normal and acceptable cannot be true either.
>Kvetching intensifies as the Jews turn on each other to "correct the record".
80a06c No.10378588
>>10378573
Yes, she's half kike, half nigger, like Obama.
04d3ec No.10378604
>>10378524
>>10378564
So wait, is she straight or gay? We know for a fact she's got an "Asian Fetish".
cfa18e No.10378609
>>10378585
Science isn't truth, but a method to look for the truth. The real problem here is that these people worship science when it supports them, and decide to step back when it contradicts them, so no discussion is ever made in good faith.
04d3ec No.10378610
>>10378585
>But Dr. Weinstein Sheckleburg, if science isn't the truth then that means all of the thesis and "studies" on transgenderism and homosexuality being normal and acceptable cannot be true either.
LOL!!!
812196 No.10378653
>>10378102
I'd sooner fuck an actual horse than a kike, less chance of STDs that way.
e7c766 No.10378681
>>10378564
I don't even want to imagine what the mongrel that this combination will produce would look like.
5f6923 No.10378983
>>10378119
So she got a Ph.D in Physics, and then wasted it spending all of her time with SJW bullshit… but we need more women in STEM goys
83301f No.10379069
>>10377787
>stop equating (((science))) with truth
I mean, she's got a point. All those (((studies))) about how all races are equal, global warming, and other shit have nothing to do with truth
b4cef4 No.10379081
>>10378119
>committee, committee, committee, committee, committee, committee
Women in science are by and large absolute cancer.
ff1015 No.10379093
Is this the kind of woman all of those reddit pleb "YAY SCIENCE" goony beardmen like? Jesus christ how horrifying.
9f6cac No.10379206
>it's the current year
>facts are sexist, goy
7d6fe1 No.10379226
000000 No.10379229
>>10378611
Ohfuck that resume is hilarious. Did /pol/ write this resume? This is nigger-science man tier. What the fuck does astronomy have to do with race?! ROFLAMAO!
c592ac No.10379242
>Very few curricula acknowledge that some European scientific “discoveries” were in fact collations of borrowed indigenous knowledge.
We wuz railroads and shit
edfd39 No.10379265
>>10377885
>So I'm guessing this author is also very skeptical of anthropomorphic climate change?
Of course she is. Under current literature, yids have massive beaks because the air is free.
000000 No.10379270
>>10379229
>What the fuck does astronomy have to do with race?!
It's just typical leftist fuckery with language. Given that women never want to do anything but slander and gossip, in order to put them into (male-dominated field x) you need to widen the definition of field x so that gossiping about people in x or slandering them is 'x too'. So that, for instance, ranting how sexism causes underrepresentation of women in science is 'science too', and is as valid as conducting actual legit research. This way, moaning about racism in, say, astronomy is 'astronomy too', and professional moaners are astronomers now.
000000 No.10379278
>>10379270
(Never fail to notice how this kind of messing with terms' definitions is enabled by the broader contemporary assault on language which comes in variations such as 'all words are relative' or 'only I can define myself', too.)
ebfd1c No.10379283
>>10377892
>this is chan life
L M A O
>>>/reddit/
Faggot
d0eecb No.10379290
>>10379265
>yids have massive beaks because the air is free.
This never fails to make me laugh.
000000 No.10379299
>>10379270
(In short, leftists quite consciously abuse the paradox of the heap. Take, say, writing code. Is debugging a program still programming? 'Yes, of course', would start small the leftist. Well, then, how about documenting code? Does this still fall under the definition of programming? 'Well…', you would hesitate, but the get-women-in-tech feminist is only getting started. 'And if so, then clearly teaching people about your code is programming too! And if so, then how different that is from just teaching about code generally? In fact, there is no programming without advocating programming; stop insisting that your idea of what programming is is the only true one! Being a manager in a women-can-code organization is programming too!' Step by step, we arrive at a definition that, while useful to women ('I'm a programmer too'), is completely diluted from its original sense. Sage for tl;dr.).
8a8664 No.10379307
>>10377811
>that noose
If only.
0c441b No.10379344
oy vey science can't be true if it doesn't align with our post-modern egalitarian views where everyone is equal but non-whites are slightly better and all forms of degeneracy and hedonism carry no consequences
000000 No.10379380
>>10379344
One funny thing is how she intentionally equivocated the term 'science'. She's hoping to make people distrustful of it in general, because it obviously suits her counterfactual agenda with respect to women and nonwhites, but if you read closely enough, you'll see that here and there, she's using 'science' in the sense 'men': 'science has been historically used to perpetuate oppression blah blah'. This way, she has secured herself deniability: 'I didn't speak against science, that's not true, what I did is simply used the word "science" to stand for "evil white men", stop being such an autist, I obviously didn't mean that science as a process is false'. While, as I said, successfully implanting distrust in it nonetheless. That's the benefit of equivocation: if you use a word in two senses, you can double the number of things which you vilify.
c592ac No.10379381
Science already proved that everyone is the same and bias causes everything.
That's science for you.
0c441b No.10379383
You know, I want global warming to be real, I desperately want it to be real. I want all of the world's resources to steadily die off and force whites to actually start acting like humans instead of rootless cosmopolitans shopping around for whatever makes their giney tingle.
Will we continue feeding the kangz when the oceans are dead? Will we continue our pursuits for "equality" when there isn't enough left for all of us to survive? Time for another round of brutal natural selection. Something needs to happen. Either the racewar or a near-death experience of all life on earth. I can't fucking stand this slow, meandering shuffle towards death and degeneration.
d8c177 No.10379405
>>10379383
Same, wish that global warming was real, 90% of the global workforce becomes useless or that a mega-eruption that will raise global temperatures to +30 Celsius.
0c441b No.10379407
>>10379380
>'science has been historically used to perpetuate oppression blah blah'
Science white men also made it possible for us to feed niggers and keep them alive past their expiration. But it has to go because it proves them inferior. I expect this kind of high time preference and over-emotional response from all non-whites when it comes to white envy.
a5b2ed No.10379417
Shit doesn't become false just because a Kike says it.
Yes, science isn't the same as truth.
Science is a best guess.
000000 No.10379443
>>10379383
This is true. Civilization undulates. Intelligence improving society is like an exposion which pushes layers of dirt and dust upwards. The dirt rides on it. When the wave, the original increase in raw intelligence, disappears, the dirt – women, minorities, retards – does not immediately drop down. They still enjoy its elevated status, hanging in the air for a while. We are in the period that the society's core creative impetus is gone, but elevation of the parasitic elements which benefited from it continues… for a while, until they drop, having no power of their own.
0c441b No.10379449
>>10378178
>And this woman talks about science?
Liberal science. Liberal science is looking at cool pictures of space, random trivia on reddit, and global warming (only used as a tool to guilt whites), evolution (only used as a tool to bash christians)
If they actually believed in science, they wouldn't be liberals. Evolution is the strangest to me. I imagine that "evolution" may fall out of favor with liberals in the coming years. Survival of the fittest is NOT egalitarian (and therefore not real science). Expect them to talk about how all creatures were created by a gay magic space negro.
000000 No.10379465
>>10379381
>it was actually the way they were treated in the still predominantly male class room
Right, that oppressive 'way' to which they were subjected was actually using standardized testing and actually demanding competence in the subject at hand.
Of course that 'bias' is the answer to underrepresentation of women and minorities if what is meant by 'bias' is having schools teach real, practical stuff as opposed to idle chatter.
995e1c No.10379475
>>10378336
>>10378376
I've seen some yids, but damn!
000000 No.10379480
>>10379381
>>10379465
In other words, yes, schools (used to) have 'bias': they are biased towards competence, generalization, and practical results.
1e52d1 No.10379496
That nose is on a whole new level of kike.
000000 No.10379505
>>10379449
>I imagine that "evolution" may fall out of favor with liberals in the coming years. Survival of the fittest is NOT egalitarian (and therefore not real science).
You're forgetting the fundamental enabler of egalitarianism, namely free will. A liberal will get rid of their cognitive dissonance by something along the lines of 'yes, that's true, only the fittest survive, but everyone can CHOOSE to try their hardest in order to survive, which is, incidentally, the reason that if you write off niggers and women as inherently incapable of educating themselves and improving their lives, then you are a part of the problem'. Equipping people with free will is the vehicle of leftist doublethink: it enables them to fencesit, to reluctantly concede, if needed, that yes, biological determination is a thing, but also to gleefully object to any 'oppressive' policy based on said biological determination, such as anti-immigration measures, because 'people have infinite capacity to overcome their determination through free will, therefore it's discrimination to imply that they cannot change themselves'. (In addition to 'not all are like that'.)
0c441b No.10379524
>>10379505
Leftists are tactical libertarians when it comes too muh individualism and muh nigger brown labor.
c592ac No.10379538
>>10379465
>>10379480
Personally I don't know what the hell he's talking about. He didn't provide any citations either.
000000 No.10379557
>>10379538
It's probably some nonsense like 'toxic competitiveness' or 'toxic mental/verbal rigour' in the classroom. Basically: whenever men find themselves doing or respecting something which gets shit done, some principle which leads to cooperation and success, women realize that they don't want to do that thing and bitch that it is 'institutionalized systemic oppression' created by white males to oppress them.
000000 No.10379572
>>10379538
>>10379557
In other words, achieving equality by erasing every feature of something (here: education) which exhibited gender differences. Equality through obscurity.
ef8be5 No.10379573
>>10378384
niggers have big noses, and so do jews. for this combo it's like she won the nose lottery. (as big and wide a nose as humanly possible) she also has all the same wacky thoughts and political opinions as both jews and niggers. she basicly a perfect synthesis of yid and nigro. here are some similar nigger jews. with exactly the same political opinions… what a (((coincidence!)))
b58a13 No.10379595
Strictly speaking truth is only known a priori, but gas her anyway
8c32bf No.10379632
>>10378369
they are def silver now
33d129 No.10379656
>>10378336
>Diversity work in Physics
Wake me the fuck up, why must this be the timeline we occupy? This is the way the west is turning into mediocrity or worse.
ef8be5 No.10379672
>>10379656
this shit has been going on since the 50's. but nobody heeded the warnings.
a5b2ed No.10379701
>>10379449
>Survival of the fittest is NOT egalitarian (and therefore not real science).
Um. Liberals LOVE survival of the fittest.
Your problem is that the definition of "fitness" you have in mind is not what is meant when they talk about evolutionary fitness.
Don't believe me? Then just pay attention next time a liberal is arguing with a right-winger about White replacement/outbreeding by muds. They get positively giddy when the chance comes to preach about that "only happening because non-Whites have better reproductive fitness."
The American negro is like a precision engine of sexual reproduction - finely calibrated to operate at peak efficiency within the Western welfare state. This is why niggers and middle-easterners have vastly more children than Whites. If they're raising more children then by definition they are fitter and liberals LOVE to let you know that, with a smirk on their faces, backed up by "science."
0929da No.10379724
>>10378564
when you're already a disgusting mutt I guess you don't give a fuck about what your kid looks like
5db8a3 No.10379726
>>10377787
Christ, that fucking snozz…
8c0312 No.10379727
>>10379696
Here’s the full thing for anyone interested. https://archive.org/details/100thingsyoushou1949unit
0929da No.10379734
>>10379726
It's not surprising the jews in movies get plastic surgery all the time to look whiter
cd509c No.10379737
>>10378604
she had to switch to dyke when she realized interracial marriage wasn't progressive enough
5db8a3 No.10379739
Winner of the Opression Olympics!
d27cfc No.10379747
>>10378564
>tfw hover-handing on your wedding day
6774c8 No.10379766
>>10377787
>Look at her.
>Just LOOK at her.
This again? No, not everyone with a big nose is a–
<click thumbnail
WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT
>>10378336
That's not human, that's a walking cartoon
>>10378146
>>10378565
Absolutely agree, science is a tool to access truth, it should never be viewed as a truth in itself (same with religion)
0929da No.10379816
>>10379755
any before pics of her nose?
80a06c No.10379836
>>10379524
Not quite lolbergs at least say you can hire who you want, liberals want to and have written laws to force you to hire shitskins regardless of the business owner's wishes.
74bda5 No.10379843
>>10379816
http://bfy.tw/DJag
ef8be5 No.10379848
>>10379755
>>10379816
I think she still looks gross… ewww.
0929da No.10379866
>>10379843
>>10379848
is it safe to say part of why jewish people hate us so much is because they feel inferior and ugly? (which they are)
8c32bf No.10379880
>>10377787
interesting exchange here. get to see a glimpse of how fem indoctrination courses are formed.
880568 No.10379897
>>10377787
Oh my god, what's wrong with it's face?
c2eedb No.10379903
>>10377787
>>Stop Equating Science with Truth
Now where have I seen another semitic group that finds science problematic….
https://www.facebook.com/christiansagainstscience/
c592ac No.10379913
>>10379880
I suppose if certain women helped found the tech sector that means group differences don't exist lmoa
ef8be5 No.10379924
>>10379866
she has some dane ancestry it sounds like, but if you listen to her talk behind the scenes she's just as slimy as any full blooded yid.
bbfe5c No.10379925
>>10378384
nigger and Jew genes
ef8be5 No.10379949
>>10379880
just more brain washing, I hope trump keeps working to demolish (((gender studies))) in the education system.
1bbbda No.10379966
>>10379913
Women lack the intelligence to understand a concept that complex.
ef8be5 No.10379976
>>10379903
>christians
you mean (((christians)))
000000 No.10379985
>>10379966
Well, to be fair, a woman's understanding of a subject depends on the explanatory ability of the man talking to her. A woman's ken is constant in the sense that she only ever understands 20 % of what is being said to her, but it is variable in the sense that different men can speak to her.
80a06c No.10379992
>>10379985
Except these women don't listen anymore because its just "mansplaining".
0929da No.10380002
>>10379976
don't derail this fucking thread with your anti christian D&C shit nigger
000000 No.10380009
>>10379992
Why would a woman reveal that she has understood what a man has told her? Expressing one's comprehension is a sign of gratitude. Why both acknowledge someone's help to make you understand a complex topic and accuse him of mansplaining if you can only accuse, and skip the acknowledgement bit altogether?
It is in women's interest to show zero sign of having benefited from men's explanations, for obvious reasons, but this doesn't mean that they actually don't do that, as far as they are able.
1bbbda No.10380032
>>10379985
No, women brains are biologically incapable of understanding topics as complex as group trends. Women who appear to understand it don't, they just mindlessly parrot men like they're supposed to.
8c0312 No.10380042
>>10379976
Reported for obvious kike shill.
ef8be5 No.10380048
>>10380002
> anti christian D&C shit nigger
I was pointing out that whenever a christian is fucking up, a jew is likely behind it. get a clue.
ef8be5 No.10380055
>>10380042
i'm not talking about actual christians you idiot. i'm talking about jews using christian, learn how to read. >>10380048
8c0312 No.10380068
>>10380055
Oh, yes; sorry. I meant to quote the guy YOU replied to.
0929da No.10380083
ef8be5 No.10380107
>>10380083
good, keep being a kike puppet.
ef8be5 No.10380118
>>10380068
eh, as much I like christianity for its effect on building western morality. I hate how co-opted its become. but I have no idea how to fix it.
7b01f8 No.10380136
>>10378336
>>10377787
>>10378564
>the nose isn't shopped
Jesus fuck.
1f0894 No.10380166
>>10378146
Like always they state something true then swap it with their faulty argument. False equivalence, bait and switch etc.
347ab4 No.10380207
>>10379381
>the differences aren't biological they are cultural
ef8be5 No.10380215
>>10380136
I don't think i've ever seen a female academic that wasn't jewish or at least married to one.
>>10380166
how can the youth be immunized from commie mental gymnastics?
ef8be5 No.10380239
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>10380207
kinda reminds me of this female astronaut.
14b13e No.10380379
OP looking at Slate… ask yourself what you're doing with your life.
Of course it's batshit stuff and from a cartoon kike looking dyke bitch. A doctorate in astrophysics and writing for a blog, suuuuuure.
ef8be5 No.10380448
>>10380379
it's always good to keep tabs on what the normies are reading.
aece8f No.10381147
>>10377892
>chan life
hahahah gas yourself.
>>10377886
I don't like this image because it allows shills to learn how to blend in without ever posting or lurking on the board. Our rules and culture are unwritten, that's how we weed shills and faggots out.
delete this image now
558c88 No.10382207
>>10379381
>the averages went up when people who perform exactly the same were admitted in greater numbers
This retard can't even keep his falsehoods intelligent and he thinks people will fall for his unsubstantiated bullshit.
b51d1c No.10382226
>>10377927
>Go back to cuckchan.
Which chan are you referring to as cuckchan:
The one that has banned any anon posting clear evidence of Trump's entire campaign being a massive jewish hoax against the goy or the one that allows open discussion of how the majority boards have been compromised by hasbara kikes shilling for ZOG?
558c88 No.10382239
>>10379672
Hilarious. He even looks like a Jew.
d0eecb No.10382297
>>10377839
evolutionary psychology focuses on how the brain actually functions and the neurochemistry involved that results in behaviors
it is the least (((psychology))) tier of all psychology
647314 No.10382310
b47cd0 No.10382373
>>10380239
>In a weightless environment
>flails around like a toddler
>is unmindful of her surroundings
>just throws the toolbox to the side
>later called it "disheartening" to have grease all over the tool bag
d57b9f No.10383842
File: 8a3ec0de77b98be⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 105.63 KB, 721x539, 103:77, Ovadia-Mourad-Sarah-cplte.jpg)
>>10378376
Yeah, certainly not fixed. I'd bet 88 shekels that under those clothes you'd discover pic related.
e5e480 No.10383874
>>10383842
Why oh why did I look?
f06ba3 No.10384164
Has to be some kind of ayylmao. Jewgle says it's working undercover as an negro with a phd, but look at it.
85f852 No.10384323
>>10380002
>>Anon finds Truth problematic
>>Posting in thread about groups finding Truth is problematic
WEW!!
83dafd No.10384354
>>10384323
>anon finds higher truth problematic
>because higher truth isn't factual
Conflating higher truth with facts and not understanding that is is not facts is why Christians lost every debate with atheists because the Christians argued that their higher truth was factual while not being able to provide evidence that it was.
Fundamentalism is cancer.
9465da No.10384367
>>10380002
Just don't respond to them and they'll continue flailing like retards
789752 No.10384368
>>10382373
Don't worry, it's a typical greenscreen studio vid from NASA.
>>10384164
It's incredible ugly. Fakest-looking fake human I've seen for a long time.
789752 No.10384375
>>10384354
>is why Christians lost every debate with atheists
Kek. Christians with a modicum of philosophical education regularly blow atheists out of the water. Empiricist materialism with its concomitant, atheism, is one of the most retarded metaphysical positions possible. It's not even kindergarden level.
>Fundamentalism is cancer.
Delicious irony.
83dafd No.10384391
>>10384375
>there is empirical evidence for the existence of god
No their is not. There is faith which is not empirical.
>Delicious irony
Yes ISIS, in their fundamentalism, does nothing wrong.
c592ac No.10384419
>>10384391
>Yes ISIS, in their fundamentalism, does nothing wrong.
Not in terms of creating a virile society. Truth is the basis of action.
789752 No.10384678
>>10384391
>No their is not. There is faith which is not empirical.
Typical empiricist strawmann. First you have to proof that sense knowledge is the only kind of valid knowledge in the first place.
Protip: you can't. That's why empiricism is intellectually dead since more than 200 years now
>Yes ISIS, in their fundamentalism, does nothing wrong.
Another strawman, and that even ignores that atheists are among the most fundamentalist people imaginable.
057363 No.10384721
>>10377839
Here's the smaller, better quality version with sound.
0b9595 No.10384727
>>10377787
She is right, but for the wrong reasons. I know that by "truth" she means "things that turn goyim bad." But there is no such thing as truth outside of your head, only degrees of confidence. Feelz > realz. If that wasn't true, things like Communism would never become popular. Though you do need realz to understand feelz.
789752 No.10384736
>>10384727
>But there is no such thing as truth outside of your head
Solipsistic bullshit. There is Truth, with a big T, although, of course, it's by no means easy to ascertain it in all cases. The fall into relativism is precisely the problem with the West, from where all problems spring, including racial egalitarianism.
0b9595 No.10384771
>>10384736
Then can you refute the rest of my post without going "NO U"? Because all you're telling everyone is that your thinking with feelz.
000000 No.10384775
>>10384736
You should have just told him that he's a retard who relies on appeal to ignorance ("but what if you're wrong?!?!?!") in arguments because he's too dim to think of valid counterarguments or weak points.
0b9595 No.10384783
>>10384775
>More NO U.
Lel. Want to know why merchants always end up the real leaders in countries, for better or worse? Because they have the highest potential for understanding feelz. Most people make their money and time by working. But merchants make their money and time by convincing other people to give their money and time to the merchant. So the merchant has to know what it takes to convince people almost all of the time.
789752 No.10384828
>>10384771
Nobody denies that, for rhetorical/propaganda purposes, the manipulation of feelings is fundamental. But that does NOT mean that objective truth doesn't exist! "Don't get high on your own supply".
>>10384775
>You should have just told him that he's a retard who relies on appeal to ignorance ("but what if you're wrong?!?!?!") in arguments because he's too dim to think of valid counterarguments or weak points.
Yes, perhaps. Interesting that this topic came up, though. During the last few weeks I'm reading and listening more about fundamental philosophy and the West's fall into relativism. Really important to root out faulty premises, in oneself as well as other /pol/acks.
000000 No.10385058
>>10384828
>the West's fall into relativism
Several mutually reinforcing factors are to blame. Western psychology and psychotherapy, Eastern "meditative" practices, "psychedelic" drugs. All of them push, more or less forcefully, excessive introspection, which replaces innate, healthy preoccupation with the external, objective, physical, with aimless self-contemplation ("when you really think about it, the only thing I can be certain of is my own metacognition blahblahblah") and pseudolinguistics ("every definition is relative"). Notice how each of the three is heavily promoted in the media.
789752 No.10385130
>>10385058
Good post, would agree. I was listening to some Jay Dyer podcasts the last days and fully agree with him in that Western elites (Jews and non-Jews alike) have been and are heavily pushing weaponized, weakening pseudo-philosophy on the masses. The three vectors you mentioned are the faulty premises which, ultimately, express themselves in racial egalitarism, feminism and a host of other ills. Good foundational philosophical thinking is really important, not as some sort of armchair thinking, but as a form of mental firewall.
000000 No.10385187
>>10385130
>racial egalitarism, feminism and a host of other ills
Ah, this is a vast subject. I forgot the details since I last tried to define it, but the core difference between liberal and rational use of language is simply that the latter describes and the former changes.
This is going to be a hurried post, but just a couple of examples:
>"Group X behaves in fashion Y." is a rational claim.
<"But not all X are like that!" changes the listener in the sense of changing their focus from awareness of the general pattern into focusing at the exceptions.
>"You did X to me."
<"That was long ago!" / "Don't dwell on the past!" hopes to change the listener's sense of importance of the transgression.
>"X is Y."
<"But if it is not so? What if you're overlooking some factors?" hopes to change the listener by undermining their certitude.
>"X is Y."
<"You should take a closer look at your motives which motivate you to say this." directly manipulates the listener's attention.
>"Consumption of X causes Y."
<"Well, X is fine as long as you do it in moderation." changes you in the sense of replacing your immediate awareness of the relationship between X and Y with focus on a logical truism.
>"Group X does thing Y."
<"Then they aren't true members of X!" changes your definition of group X to exclude those members which are guilty of doing X.
Notice how at no point does actually say anything.
000000 No.10385261
>>10385130
>>10385187
Or in short, the difference is between generalized and personalized.
85f852 No.10385458
>>10384375
>>atheism
>>metaphysical
789752 No.10385577
>>10385187
Good examples. I still have much to learn about those tactics and fallacies.
>>10385458
What's there to laugh about? Atheism is a claim about the (non)existence of God or gods, so it's per definition a metaphysical stance. This is really basic stuff.
6a17bb No.10385598
>Dr.
I'm betting that that abomination added the title just to sound more credible
6ebe0a No.10385673
>>10377947
I hate slate. that site still doesn't support https connections. I guess they don't want to prevent ZOG from recording the traffic.
6ee90c No.10385888
holy shit is that the elusive nigkike? somebody tell DeMarcus (((Liebowitz))) so he can get his oy vey muh dik on
456396 No.10386277
>>10377787
Jesus, why. I'm not even a /pol/ user but something about those images just physically hurts me.
0978fe No.10386361
>>10378383
Why would you bang a kike anyway?
0871e0 No.10386450
friendly reminder that science is probably T H E most potent tool in the human arsenal and that you shouldnt believe the kikes trying to poz it into whatever the fuck they are trying to do with it
science, just like 3rd reich, is not what the media kikes are portraying it to be
it is something glorious, beautiful, and of utmost importance
789752 No.10387170
>>10386450
>friendly reminder that science is probably T H E most potent tool in the human arsenal
>it is something glorious, beautiful, and of utmost importance
Agree, but it has to be open and transparent science. The whole scientific process nowadays is highly pozzed and very intransparent. Govs, corps and foundations keep a tight lid on things, and individual researchers have to tow the line just to get scraps for funding.
e06009 No.10387231
On what planet is she black?
c1a9af No.10387243
>>10384828
>But that does NOT mean that objective truth doesn't exist!
Objective truth exists, but it can never be proven. Only felt/believed. Even Christianity asserts this.
38e69e No.10387443
Funny, it was "science" that they used to force cock-sucking faggotry on the masses.
3e60c9 No.10387480
>>10379069
The issue with those is that they aren't doing science. They are coming to predetermined conclusions based on their own biases and selecting the data which fits their narrative.
789752 No.10387647
>>10387243
>Objective truth exists, but it can never be proven.
Complete bullshit. The proof is that one is unable to change reality at will, that there is always something - the world - which puts resistance to your will and desire. This clearly shows that the self and the world are not identical, i.e. that there exists an objective "outside" reality.
85f852 No.10388412
>>10385577
>>Atheism is a claim about the (non)existence of God or gods
You can't state that taking a stance on something that does not exist is still a stance on its existence but just denial. It is pure cognitive dissonance.
789752 No.10389825
>>10388412
>You can't state that taking a stance on something that does not exist is still a stance on its existence but just denial. It is pure cognitive dissonance.
Of course you can. Metaphysics is the part of philosophy related to the ultimate grounds of reality, concerned with "what really is". When making a claim about ultimate reality - in this case the existence or nonexistence of God or gods (which are not the same, but let's leave that aside for the moment) -, you are ipso facto making a metaphysical claim. There's no way around it.
Atheism usually comes as a package bundled with materialism (the metaphysical claim that only matter exists) and empiricism (the epistemological claim that only sense knowledge is valid knowledge). Both are easily dismantled, that's why the queen of natural sciences, physics, threw out both more than a hundred years ago.
I don't really have something against atheism per se. It just gets terribly on my nerves that many of them speak as if they had a kind of monopoly on logic and rationality, when in fact, ironically, many of them operate based on completely outdated metaphysics and epistemology. The whole Dawkins crowd etc., many of whom have absolutely no idea how current scientific theory work. It's much, much more "platonic" and metaphysical than they think. Pauli, Heisenberg, or Maturana for biology etc, that's where it's at.
95c8c6 No.10389968
>>10378336
That's a two-bagger.
85f852 No.10390650
>>10389825
>>Atheism usually comes as a package bundled with materialism (the metaphysical claim that only matter exists)
Dictionary
>>a·the·ism ˈāTHēˌizəm/ - noun
>> disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.
You are simply making things up and I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are not intentionally trying to deceive anyone. There is NO mention of materialism in that definition.
>>10389825
>>you are ipso facto making a metaphysical claim. There's no way around it.
So if I deny the existence of Princess Luna in Equestria from My Little Pony, you are saying that is a metaphysical claim that epistemology applies? I am genuinely interested in how you answer this.
789752 No.10390827
>>10390650
>There is NO mention of materialism in that definition.
I didn't reference the definition of the term "atheism", but the fact that most atheists are also materialists and empiricists. At least in my experience.
>So if I deny the existence of Princess Luna in Equestria from My Little Pony, you are saying that is a metaphysical claim that epistemology applies?
Yes, of course. Every statement that makes a claim regarding ultimate reality is, by definition, a metaphysical one. Of course in the case of fictional characters whe would have to specify this, as e.g. comic characters do exist in certain way, albeit only in fiction.
bdb936 No.10390866
>>10378524
Gay weddings look ridiculously unaesthetic. Even with the degeneracy aside, something about seeing the two white dresses or the two black tuxedos standing next together triggers my autism something fierce.
a1225d No.10390890
df9d9a No.10391017
>>10378564
>jewess racemixing
ANYONE WHO LAYS A TRAP OR A HOLE FOR ANOTHER FALLS INTO IT HIMSELF, HAHAHA
>marriage (Modern Day Society)
HAHAHA
da28dd No.10392124
>>10379976
As a reborn believer who would have been derogatorily termed and/or beheaded as a "christian"… i.e. an individual who bases his/her objective Truth on the Living Word and attempts to live a Christ Like life Inspired by Jesus Christ. I cannot agree more, the cookie cutter mould (((man-made))) religion or the synagogue of satan that has conspired many of us to follow in, has lead most "christians" down a life of hedonism. I have met atheists with better hearts than that of those who claim to be christians - which in itself was a derogatory term in the days of Paul.. "The Way" was their movement and that was what it was known as, I would argue that the buildings of brick and mortar, the dogma and the fallibility of man is guilty as sin… I see no reason why any believer should argue against science, in fact, it should be encouraged. For our beautiful creation and biblical knowledge always encourages science. Science is running scared and yet man places it's pedestals on flawed theories and continues to build a tower of glass. Science can easily support the Godhood and context of Jesus Christ, Creation, Existence. The laws of thermodynamics alone support many clauses. It's just sad to see how man's ego, homework and studies trigger them to a degree that they would go apeshit when disproved at their own game. I don't blame them, I mean, imagine working on a theory for 20 years, only to be BTFO by the bible… Then to see and to find scientific evidence that the younger kids are creating theorems that disprove one's theory. It's been occuring for years but the scientific community chooses to (((ignore))) the data which is clear for all to see. It's about communities, (((groups))) and affiliations. Nobody wishes to lose face, however… the data exists and you do not have to be a "scientist" to see the problem within the data.
da28dd No.10392163
>>10379976
Still, do not mock jews for Jesus. At least they are repenting for what their people have done. They are doing something. These are the people the kikes hate even more. Get spat on. I actually have no problem because there is no such thing as a (((jewish))) christian, only a completed Jew. And these people are a bigger ally to you than what you would be lead to believe.
224656 No.10393104
>>10378611
And what Blackness does she have?
Confused European here asking
789752 No.10394593
>>10393930
Good post. I agree, if an individual or a people push God from his throne, something will always take this place. Eliminating God leads to humanism, i.e. putting Man central. This leads to egalitarianism, because once you have put Man central, there isn't an objective foundation for ordering human affairs anymore. From there on it rapidly spirals into socialism, feminism and a-racialism. Very true also that the "education" system really fucks people up. It can take years to deprogram oneself.
de6eae No.10396250
>>10389825
The heisenberg and goedel crowd are really interesting, because in a way they are really incomplete, that is why they need god, dont they?
In a way there is nothing inherently bad about it except for that jew not eating like the suppenkasper.
de6eae No.10396609
>>10395424
Religion has to be replaced by tits, and tits and even more tits. Useless bags of fat in motion, two axiomes that grew, and every nigger can count that even without any language. A language we all obey. It is some useless bags filled of fat and glands.
de6eae No.10396885
>>10396609
And the hypermoralist fags willl get the ratatata.
Getting fucked like the cunts you are, the only thing that is hard is my diamond dick. Like an ad "lonely horney single mothers". Make memes with the copyright sign make memes, make em with no avail.
de6eae No.10396903
>>10396885
Just like the fbi behavioural unit, you like to look in the mirror, and you are fat dumb ape, feral beast incognito. A feral nigger. Not really a gorilla but a fat deprived ape with a lot of suger.
471cdf No.10397743
>>10378336
<her work includes opposing a telescope because muh tribes
<national society of black physicists
<Bitch Magazine
<PhDivas and MSNBC
<lgbt+physicists
HOW JEWISH CAN ONE PERSON BE HOLY SHIT
244020 No.10397915
>>10379897
Lack of a soul impedes development.
04d6a0 No.10397953
>>10397481
because they would be meaning it in an anti-bolshevist way. shill
000000 No.10398185
>>10378565
>Science gets to physical truth, but it can't access/identify truths such as what is good and what is evil, right and wrong, justice and honour, god and fate etc.
All this things could be approached scientifically too.
And this is why became white people great - because they did so and did not rely on stupid "holy books" or on rabbis/priests to tell them what is right and what is wrong.
471cdf No.10398736
>>10377787
>>10378336
Compact single-image version.
a8fd88 No.10398830
>>10377787
that's her real face.
i was thinking OP had it shooped to resemble a Wyatt Mann cartoon. turns out he didn't.
but more to the point. they are the ones who started using "science" as an argument to silence opposing views and make the ones who held them stupid and ignorant.
i'm surprised she's surprised.
a8fd88 No.10398859
>>10398736
so, did she do anything physics related in her career, or…?
ecd77e No.10398861
471cdf No.10399005
>>10398830
>they are the ones who started using "science" as an argument to silence opposing views
>i'm surprised she's surprised.
The jew cries out in pain as he strilkes you.
- /pol/ish proverb.
>>10398859
>so, did she do anything physics related in her career, or…?
Yes, >>10398736
471cdf No.10399096
now I know why I hate clowns so much
85f852 No.10401482
>>10393930
Your screencap is retarded.
Since you push (((christianity))) in, then you will appreciate that your religion is communism. You simply cloak it in semitism. Your kind is poison.
http://www.cpusa.org/interact_cpusa/how-does-communism-and-christianity-work-together/
196a6c No.10401756
>>10377886
>redtexted "header"
I never understood this. We already have a subject field available that renders a title (or "header") in blue text. Redtexting a title for the post seems redundant and also pushes out your subtitle when browsing the catalog and looks like unreadable shit. 'Splain this.
That said, posting infographics on how to expedite your journey from newfag to seasoned shitposter is equivalent to "lurk less." Kind of against the ethos, no?
9502f6 No.10402093
>>10378524
Jews didnt come this far to self disintegrate
She will impregnate herself to carry her rotten dna into the future.