>>10417732
>i'm the one that's triggered
Sure dixie
>The confeds simply stuck to the constitution; the (((north))) wanted to make us into the seed prototype of a (((one world government))) and if it weren't for the "rednecks" you hate so much, they'd have succeeded by now.
We live in zog already you ditz, hicks or no hicks both me and you are under it's thumb
>And you're omitting the fact that slave ownership was practiced across the entire US, north and south, prior to abolition.
Ahem no, the last "northern" state to practice slavery was maine, which flipped to "free" after an agreement to make (i believe) Missouri into a slave state.
You would be right to say we both were racist, but neither me nor you have a problem with racism.
>The only difference is the north tried to legislate morality
Nice buzzword there, wtf do you think fascism is going to try and do when we send homos to camps?!
>Another fun fact: slaves were only owned, for the most part, by the extremely wealthy
Many of them, kikes
>The "rednecks" you decry so much hadn't the resources to purchase a slave
Their problems were that they were golems fighting for southern kikes and foreign kikes. I have no problem with good southern men that don't want their daughters to fuck apes mind you, the issue is about southerners fighting to keep niggers INSIDE THE COUNTRY
>I'm starting to wonder if you're just an unusually clever (((shill))) trying to discredit the men who are the closest thing to a /pol/ power base among the masses in order to D&C.
tbh I'm just proding southern racists that oh so often dismiss northern racists, I have no problem working with you guys, hell if you want to fly the stars and bars while you do it, be my guest, just don't expect me to whistle dixie while you do it.
Also I'm proding anti christian racists for dismissing christian atheists to a similar affect, again no problem working with you guys as long as at the end of the day I can go to a church that isn't a cinder.
>You're also pretending that charities, in general, aren't a fucking (((con)))
Secular charities yes very much so it's why I refuse to give to them, foreign charities to niggers too. But the salvation army, saint judes (no not that jude), etc why not donate to them?
>while giving special elevation to those in a state of victimhood
Yes these child victims of cancer without enough money to pay for a regular hospital treatment sure are undeserving of money. How much of a piece of shit are you and do you realize that greed goes AGAINST NATIONAL SOCIALISM.
>NatSoc would end poverty
Would it cure cancer? No you can't end poverty, you can simply lessen the blow of it, and national socialism does it very well, partially through CHARITY pic related
>(((Christianity))), on the other hand, has never made any effective impact on the levels of poverty
Golden dawn hasn't fixed all of greece's problems that must mean they're cucks, Christ did your mom try and pair you up with a nog in a church?!
>Christians have never fought social injustice
Wtf do you even mean by this give me examples?
>Hitler did more for mankind, in 10 years, than your kind managed in the preceding century
The preceding century was the rise of secularism, and the beginning of the fall of the greater church the fuck you want out of us?
>He also did it without the horrible side effects of abolition
Because importing niggers was such a great fucking idea, between the slave rebellions, the white poverty, the later nigger problem, I wonder why anyone would support abolition?
>suffrage, emasculation of men
Patriarchy is a Christian value
>destruction of male sexuality
So is chastity and lynching faggots
>Remember, it was under the Christians that divorce became a real thing.
Any Christian that is worth even being called a Christian knows that divorce IS A SIN, great understanding of christian values though.
>It took Christians… a mere 1100 years or so to undo that
It's actually kinda quicker then that, it took secularists (people who shouldn't be called christians) 200 years to do that
You're blaming shit on Christians what was done by atheists and jews.
>If you accept the idea of "giving to the poor", going to Africa and helping there is a logical extension
No it is not, because going to africa and making some warlord rich, while not solving jack shit expect making someone feel good is retarded, drug rehabilitation units, donating to the poor in THIS COUNTRY, helping kids with cancer IN THIS COUNTRY, helps more people then sending money to some ugandan prince.
>from there it's a short jump to admitting them into your country
Why don't we just raid african coasts in viking garb and take them as slaves.
>And it's all your fault.
Fuck I'm both responsible for slavery AND NIGGER RIGHTS, I'm feeling pretty kosher now.