>>10400685
Because only so many of them will do the right thing no matter the consequences, that's a very rare person. Would you risk losing your job, being sued, going to jail, and having your name slandered, all to protect a populace that's too asleep to stand up for you or care?
The populace gave up and went to sleep, don't blame police for not wanting to be cannon fodder for a dead nation. But the spirit of liberty lives on and we have an opportunity to put life back into the nation.
>>10400693
>What is the punishment for cops who openly comply with unlawful orders like yesterday?
I don't know but I'd like to. Maybe a lawfag or LEO anon could help us out. Regardless I think that's the wrong tactic. It's better to identify the mayors and others who give these illegal orders and bring full responsibility for the event to bear on their shoulders. It's criminal behavior in the course of official duty which is corruption, these mayors need to be doing 20 years in federal prison.
>If anything, we should reward cops who leak information on high level corruption
That's a really good idea, how could we do that? Cops talk and maybe not every guy on the line knows who gave the order, enough will, because it's illegal so they'll push back and need to be convinced.
>>10400745
Hello SPLC.