>>10402764
>>10402767
>>10402775
>>10402898
Link?
As I said, I've seen plenty of these graphics toted around /pol/ and other places, but I'd like a full transcript or a link to a source.
Call me cynical, but I'm uncertain as to how 'badass' Patton actually was, and I'd like to see it verified.
>>10402785
Considering how much those graphics are pushed round here, I would hope as much.
I learned in examination of some of the surrounding material that, apparently, Patton at one point got in some trouble for saying something in the media without thinking - but what he said may not be what one would expect.
Considering the wide-spread acceptance of the "Hitler wanted to take over the world!" narrative, its rather amusing too - you see, Gen. Patton got in trouble for suggesting that the US and the UK were "destined" to "rule the world together"… But what upset people - in the media, specifically - wasn't the implication that, ya know, "White people were destined to rule the world", or anything of that sort.
No, what got Patton in trouble with the (((media))) of the time, was that he didn't included our (((allies))) the USSR in that statement.
Funny little narratives that slip through the cracks of time…