The aftermath of this "terrorist attack" in Charlottesville has driven me to a certain epiphany about the political ideals we seek to achieve. I want to share these conclusions with you, and seek your commentary and criticism. These conclusions are NOT meant to demoralize you. In fact, they should vitalize you. If you read this thoroughly you will understand why.
First.
We cannot succeed without the collapse of the existing order.
There are ZERO qualities to modern western democracies which allow purely uncompromised völkisch ideals to prevail. Why is this? You may wonder because it was Hitler himself who rose to power through election. The primary concern is the United States of America. I am not going to presume Donald Trump is a cuck, Jew, our secretly /ourguy/ because none of us know the answer to this. However, it is extremely obvious that regardless of his true beliefs his platform has consistently been one of civic nationalism. But is this not a gayway to the third position, a positive shifting of the Overton window? No. This is because western democracy is critically dependent on the mob. The mob is a powerful political tool. It is stupid, irrational, volatile, easy to manipulate and easy to subvert. If you understand the mob's nature, you necessarily understand the power of mainstream media institutions. The mob is the reason the most popular far right movement in America is corralled by faggots like Milo Yiannopoulos and implicit faggots like Richard Spencer. In other words, the necessity of political success lies in mass appeal, and völkischism, by its nature, has very little mass appeal in the USA. Why? Because a critical component of völkischism is the recognition of nature's brutality. The average western man has no relationship with brutality. The reason you do is because either you've either experienced it yourself, or because you're sufficiently alienated from society that you can come to these philosophical conclusions on your own (or through fellow internet autistics). So perhaps now you understand why Hitler could win an election on his platform. Because the European post-WW1 population was VERY cognizant of hardship and brutality. They rebelled against the cultural horrors of Weimar, likely because it stood in such stark contrast with the hardships of WW1. While I could go on about how easy it is for (((them))) to subvert third positionist movements, I think the alt-right is a sufficient example of why your most beautiful ideals would be totally bastardized by the modern political nature of the west. If the most redpilled man in the world was elected US president, the law could not permit him to do anything we deem useful or necessary. Only the mob would allow him to defy the law, and as I've asserted, the current political climate does not grant us such a mob. The mob of the USA is racially diverse, addicted to material escapism, and estranged from their ancestors' history, and even world history in general. The enlightenment principles of the USA's foundation simply cannot coexist with völkischism at home or anywhere in the world.
Which brings me to my next point.
European ethno-nationalists cannot succeed without the collapse of the USA. You may already understand intuitively why this is without having read the above paragraph. If civic nationalism is the establishment threshold of right wing ideology in the USA, then there is simply no way any of you are going to get away with doing what is necessary to fix the "Eurostan" crisis. I do not believe there is any political party you can elect (one who's platform is truly in your best interests) that will not be subverted by the CIA, let alone the (((media))). This is because legitimizing ethno-nationalism among US allies will lead to the destabilization of the USA. Trump currently supports right-wing nationalist countries like Poland and Hungary and their right to not totally ruin their nation. He can get away with this because his position back home is anti-immigration. However, he will in all likelihood not attempt to unfuck those European countries that are already so damaged by cultural marxism and immigration. He cannot take the heat of helping you deport every single Achmed, and in the current economic order, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't. Your nationhood was put on the sacrificial altar via mass immigration to save the comfy world of industrial growth and materialism. This brings me to my next point.
cont.