With the events of Charlottesville and the Left's doubling-down and ratcheting up of attacks to destroy monuments underlying America's cultural foundation, combined with MSM hysterics as far away as Europe propagandizing the events of single shitty protest and counter protest in a single US city as if it's of absolute paramount importance to all of humanity, many of us are recognizing that we are fast approaching an ominous and impending moment. We know what is ahead of us. Before civil war, before physical violence, they shall attempt to remove us first from the Internet. Daily Stormer is among the first causalities. It probably won't be the last. I pray that Jim is watching his back. Let's assume the worst. Trump is a single term president. Maybe even before his term is up, 4chan's /pol/ is gutted, 8chan is shutdown, and some of us are rounded up to be made examples of. What will those of us who remain do than besides seek out other less known boards. We need a more comprehensive strategy, or we'll meet again not on another image board but in the gulag.
We have several paths to choose from. Only one leads to victory. What does this path look like. Where does it lead? I may have some idea, but first some background.
Alexander the Great was the first to demonstrate that mankind could be unified despite differences between language, cultural, and religious expectations. Alexander laid the foundation for the expectations of future globalists, giving them hope that all of mankind could be domesticated into a singular direction to supersede their local and tangible concerns. In attempting to fulfill this lofty goal, he successfully reallocated the gold assets accumulated during the long reign of Babylonian antiquity into the Mediterranean economy. His dream, shaped by Aristotle, had secured a heart-stopping volume of wealth for him, his peers, and the rest of all subsequent Western civilization. This promise of wealth recentralization is what all globalists yearn for when they embrace the platitudes of equality. The unification of mankind is sold as a moral end, but it is actually a pragmatic means of achieving wealth recentralization.
In this paradigm, the nationalist is a member of a subjective, non-simple identity (Any identity more complex than race or gender is commonly considered “nationalist“) of people who produce, export, and import little, making them not only opportunity-poor, but expensive to allocate for globalist agendas. The globalist is then given incentive to use all domains of available force to pressure the nationalist into conformity under threat of isolation, punishment, and annihilation. Those who do not willfully compete against one another in a global race-to-the-bottom for their labor costs are always the enemy under this regime.
Perhaps this analysis is being too critical or maybe the globalists have the right of it when you take the vast picture of human nature into consideration. Let’s analyze this to be sure that the tone thus far is correct in pitch and intent.
Explaining global trade is a bit like explaining the flow of electricity from a power plant to a single pixel on a screen. You’re going to have to explain thousands of conversion steps and, even upon success, it’s such a vast system that few can dare claim complete understanding of it. Even electric engineers use simple short hand to make sense of it:
Burn the fuel, heat the water, spin the magnet, send the subsequent electrons into a power supply, step it down, run them through buses and capacitors and transistors, run them into registers, perform boolean logic several billion times a second, adjust the state of the billions of capacitors in RAM, analyze the state to determine where else to send electrons, send electrons to the monitor, convert the electricity to photons through a wide array of conversion techniques in the monitor, and shoot that photon from the screen into an eyeball.