[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / bestemma / cutebois / danpu / fast / general / tacos / vichan ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
July 2018 Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: b852287ef886d85⋯.png (400.64 KB, 591x591, 1:1, meditation.png)

4dad33  No.11622450

Share your thoughts about the board and how you want things to be.

Current rules are:

/pol/ is now a global board. Discuss politics, share theories, investigate, debate.

8chan is a free-speech-oriented imageboard. As a /pol/ack, you should be able to persuade and convince with arguments.

Wrongthink reports will be dismissed.

Rules for Users:

1. The 8chan Global Rule applies (no illegal content in the United States of America);

2. Keep it politics - blatantly off-topic content will be anchored - /pol/ culture / established threads are allowed;

3. No spam, no flooding;

4. No duplicates - if several threads are made about the same subject, all but one of them will be deleted and redirected to the active thread (this applies to religion and QTDDTOT / one-liner threads).

Rules for Global Volunteers:

1. Protect user privacy - never show post histories;

2. Do not ban people for having an opinion, even if you believe it's the wrong one;

3. Enforce the global and local rules.

<Edit by polvol1:

Due to disinfo being spread: /pol/ being a global board does not mean anyone with an account can moderate it. It simply means that /pol/ falls under the moderation of the global staff as listed on the top of the site, and us local polvols, both handpicked by the administration.

Post last edited at

8ae01b  No.11858525

>>11858401

The important thing to remember about the situation we face is that mere apathy to our beliefs is inherently opposition to them, simply because these motherfuckers will not stop until we’re all dead.


c2e071  No.11858611

>>11622450

>shilling using fake news and logically fallacious arguments

>constantly

>60% of threads are like this

>hurr spend all of your time debunking the same shit arguments from the same shills hundreds of times per day

You fucking imbecile. You cant possibly think it is worth anyone's time to interact with shills and only shills. Your goal must therefore be to ruin everything that 8pol was meant to be, there is no other reason for you to let this place get to the shitshow it has become..


8e387e  No.11859123

>>11856128

See thread >>11854421. Completely fucking destroyed by Q spammers and their "FUCK OFF Q-LARP" and "REPORTED FOR Q-LARP" out of fucking nowhere. Any mention of Q, positive or negative, should result in an 88 year ban. I'm so sick of hearing about it.


9ed6f7  No.11859478

>>11859123

>I'm so sick of hearing about it.

Q predicted that.


b6bb38  No.11859479

>>11858362

>(((Their))) goal is to make newcomers think we are crackpots believing in shitty conspiracies...

But that's essentially what you are.

>muh white genocide


b6bb38  No.11859491

>>11858401

>He is objectively acting in favor of white genocide

>invade, colonize, occupy entire planet for 500+ years

>claim you're being "genocided"

Pretty fucking Jewey.


8ae01b  No.11859556

>>11859491

>>11859479

Congrats on blowing your IP. No one believes a word you say now.


2bc5ce  No.11860012

File: f79adf25816b3b3⋯.jpg (30.7 KB, 350x256, 175:128, defenestrate-juden.jpg)


a964cf  No.11860786

>>11859479

>muh jewish genocide

Not one shred of evidence has surfaced to substantiate the holocaust conspiracy theory. Many accusations, much speculation, plenty of blatant lying though.


50413c  No.11860842

https://8ch.net/pol/res/11622450.html#q11860786

Calling the Holocaust a conspiracy theory is a fantastic way to discredit it.

I have to phonepost without JS enabled because pages freeze on loading, so Hot wheels can fix it, otherwise im just copying the link but im letting you know this so you know im not a newfag


2302e0  No.11860847

>>11859478

I hate to admit it, but that made me laugh.


134d2d  No.11860895

>>11860842

>Hot wheels

>im not a newfag

2 YEARS OR GO BACK


000000  No.11861537

>>11859479

Herman Rosenblat

>"She threw an apple every day in the concentration camp"

>In fact, during the war Roma and her family, who were Jewish, were passing as Roman Catholics, living with a Polish family 200 miles away. She had never tossed an apple to anyone.

>*is exposed*

>"The reality was that I wasn’t telling the truth"

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/22/business/media/herman-rosenblat-85-dies-made-up-holocaust-love-story.html

How you like 'em apples, son? One bad apple spoils the barrel and people start thinking something's fishy. :/ :/ :/

>white genocide isn't real!

Yeah, it's not a genocide. It's cultural enrichment which "52% of Israeli jews" consider "cancer" for their nation.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/most-israeli-jews-agree-africans-are-a-cancer/

But lobby for it in other nations. :)


000000  No.11862016

We need all threads mentioning China to automatically have the below posted

REMEMBER /POL/ ALL THREADS MENTIONING CHINA NEEDS ITS DAILY DOSE OF MAGICAL WORDS

1989年天安门广场大屠杀

1989年天安門廣場大屠殺


aac34f  No.11862355

File: eefea23775b095d⋯.jpg (81.38 KB, 1023x910, 1023:910, boomer_memes.jpg)

File: 07df3662bd5be98⋯.png (254.53 KB, 1600x1200, 4:3, boomer_memes2.png)

File: e746fe291b26d57⋯.jpg (35.03 KB, 380x349, 380:349, boomerlet.jpg)

In case anyone has ever wondered the validity of claim that the QLARP people are boomers, I present this as evidence. >>>/qresearch/2163497

He should have just signed his name and made them perfect. Life imitates art indeed.


8ae01b  No.11862419

>>11862355

>not being an edgy teenager and naming your family’s Wi-Fi network “FBI Mobile Logistics”

Anon, that’s not proof of anything. You’re going to drive people toward Q-LARP with that.


2302e0  No.11862780

Q-Bot is still active in >>11854421. You cared about the religion and anime arguments, but you allow this? Please explain the reasoning.


8ae01b  No.11862818

>>11862780

Pro-Q retards who post are told to fuck off to their safe space. If they make threads and try to extoll Q-LARP, those threads will be deleted.


699b3b  No.11863021

>>11862818

Did you even skim the thread? It's a pile of shit because of all the idiots arguing over Q. And no, nothing Q related seems to get deleted. Instead it consumes every fucking thread it can. Either way I'm fucking sick of hearing about it.


699b3b  No.11863066

>>11862818

I don't even think this is about Q. I think your bigger goal is just destroying threads. Pretending to care about whether people fall for Q or not is a pretense.


ef9392  No.11863574

File: a178f629590032d⋯.jpg (53.13 KB, 478x210, 239:105, the actual state of pol.jpg)

>letting SJW/Tumblr newfaggots and shills promoting Cultural Marxist propaganda on /pol/

You know what I had enough of this site nad this board. Why can't these cocksucking morons take this Tumblr-tier bullshit to /leftypol/ or delete this bullshit. So, you actually don't care when posts like this are appear out of nowhere, meanwhile some guy making this post about exposing the truth are removed. This board and site in general is dead anyway as well as cuckchan. /pol/ from 4chan is dead because of people who posting threads like that picture of my post, Tumblr/SJW invaders, paid shills and normgroids are ruining this board. When I visoted 8/pol/, I don't see no difference at all, SJW invaders appear out of nowhere promomting nonsense. I had enough of this site anyway, both 4chan and 8chan has becoming garbage and dead sites because people like YOU. All you close-minded morons can go fuck yourself. See on my fucking pic for fuck sake. You people are just pathetic. I had enough of you all. You all sold us out, goverment/media dick sucking cunts.


8ae01b  No.11863636

>>11863574

>mocking the left

>news article

>mocking the left

What’s being let happen there?

>whiny bullshit

If you’re not going to post content you’d like to see or have an argument, feel free to leave. What the fuck do we care?


2bc5ce  No.11863668

>>11863574

Its a slow trickle of quality posters that leave, eventually all that remains is cuckchan, which is just reddit and anti-whites etc. Obviously muh white privilege is not part of /pol/ culture and should warrant a ban, but this is your /pol/ on chodenigger.


8ae01b  No.11863685

>>11863668

Are you autistic? Serious question. How do you not comprehend that the article was posted to mock its contents?


2bc5ce  No.11863691

>>11863685

So youre saying /pol/ btfo.


8ae01b  No.11863827

>>11863823

>(BREATHS IN)

>>>/reddit/


16103a  No.11863934

>>11622450

Hey mods, like 7 hours ago a “hireakiller” board went up, and thats probably against US law.


09ad09  No.11864109

File: f434273580f1586⋯.jpg (720.01 KB, 2048x1548, 512:387, Donald Trump US Military G….jpg)

File: b31907d82f13721⋯.jpg (1.76 MB, 4510x1800, 451:180, Donald Trump USAIC USASOC ….jpg)

QUSASOC PREDICTED THIS

Trump, Mattis Hail Spending Bill to Fund Strongest Military Ever

https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1474925/trump-mattis-hail-spending-bill-to-fund-strongest-military-ever/

Congress, Trump give Pentagon a Budget the Likes of Which it has Never Seen

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-pentagon-budget-windfall-20180209-story.html

What the Massive US Military Budget Pays For

https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/28/politics/us-military-spending-items-intl/

Trump Touted his Colossal Spending Bill as a Blessing for the Military. Here's What the Pentagon is Getting

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/23/heres-what-the-pentagon-is-getting-in-trumps-colossal-spending-bill.html


2bc5ce  No.11864140

Put in a 100 letter minimum OP requirement, the threads are all turning into cuckchan 1 liners.


2bc5ce  No.11864146

Although of course that wont really stop the cuckchan from turning it into cuckchan, since they can cancerpost in replies all they want without bans.


aac34f  No.11864147

File: 0dc1413f61d94f1⋯.jpg (332.75 KB, 1508x806, 58:31, moarpheus.jpg)

>>11864109

This is our resident sperg, Moarpheus. Please excuse his autism. His sister basically raped him as a child and he's now a braindead potato because of it.


1cee52  No.11864350

>>11864147

literally who?


a10d73  No.11864677

Can someone give me a summary of what has happened on /pol/ in the last 6 months? I had a short but necessary break from this autism. So I heard on /v/ imkampfy/roach has been banned or something. Is that true?


0c96f5  No.11864958

>>11864677

The roach is gone. There is less intrusive moderation, but consequently the place is shilled to hell from all sides. The roach had annoying wordfilters and was far too ban happy, but the orderliness of roach/pol/ had a certain charm to it.


d46e36  No.11864976

First time i've been on this board in a few months.. i notice the insane amount of stickies are gone, which is pretty refreshing. it got tiring seeing like 5-6 stickies always clogging up the front page/catalog


8ae01b  No.11865104

>>11864060

How ironic of you. Get the fuck out.


8ae01b  No.11865129

File: 3de70372ed6a27a⋯.png (314.31 KB, 1410x1562, 705:781, End of an Era.png)

>>11864140

That’d be nice. We’ve seen an uptick in zero effort threads that look like they’re fresh off the boat from reddit.

>>11864146

Well, I wouldn’t say ‘without.’

>>11864677

We had a thread about it for a few weeks, but the main image isn’t stickied anymore. Here’s a summary.


8ae01b  No.11865135

File: a0d3f2533e96f1c⋯.png (889.75 KB, 1288x741, 1288:741, History.png)

>>11865129

Oh, wow; I found an old one from May 2016, too. This shows you just how long kikey’s subversion has been and how fucking much damage has been done to the site. His “hiring” of a reddit mod is probably why we’re STILL seeing all these redditors who think they can safely post here.


b56f3c  No.11865195

>>11864958

>orderliness of roach/pol/

Fuck out of here.


a10d73  No.11865531

>>11865129

Wow, that's good to hear. I hated that little fuck. I left exactly because I felt national socialism/traditionalism was dying here because of nu-/pol/ zionist dick sucking becoming mandatory. I hope things get better. Who would have thought things would of have gotten that BAD with the moderation. So who's the new mod as of now? Codemonkey?


8e73ee  No.11865600

>>11863668

alright cripple chan.


8e73ee  No.11865609

>>11849443

>sorry this intrude your safe spa

>REEEEE LET ME POST WHAT EVA I WANT REEEE NOT ALL JEWS ARE BAD LETS IGNORE THE TALMUD STOP MAKING THIS YOUR SAFE SPACE MAKING IT LOKE A HURTBKX YOU NAZIES ARE RETARDS

Okay go back to t_donald.


8ae01b  No.11866450

>>11865531

CM appointed new local mods, held to their own set of rules as per the OP. We see a lot more shit here because of that, but hopefully we’ll be able to turn /pol/ back to the hard right soon.

>>11762052

There is nothing harmless about nonwhites paid by jews. Please report every single thread you see about that.


8ae01b  No.11866455

And test to see if the thread is still broken.


040412  No.11866988

>>11866455

Yeah, I've seen it too. Wonder what's up, no mod activity on the thread itself so it can really only be the site being shitty.


b61c1c  No.11867070

File: 958a5b023b22fde⋯.jpg (72.89 KB, 678x1000, 339:500, 1469172003840.jpg)

we should ban or mock people who post wojak. Those who post that trash are clearly newfags from reddit and cuckchan who thought it was still cool because they saw it on their favorite aut-kike sodomite cartoon murdoch murdoch. It's basically the coolface of cy++++. If you have some sentimental attachment to the facebookjak, I suggest you make an alternative similar to how pedobear became sperdo. Stale memes are the death of board culture and an entry point for newfaggotry and subversion. Please throw dead memes into the woodchipper.


dc40f6  No.11867085

>>11867070

so true. only a faggot reddit bitch would use an integral part of chan culture on 8chan. this man is speaking the truth of the national socialist internet militant rebellion


8ae01b  No.11867099

>>11866988

If a thread already at 750 posts is made cyclical, it remains stuck unless a post or two is deleted (and therefore brought back under the limit), but it shouldn’t have happened AFTER the cyclical was made. That’s weird.

If users see that the meta is “full”, please report the OP with “thread’s stuck again” and the mods will take care of it.


b61c1c  No.11867133

File: 70e59f63ce370c5⋯.png (413.07 KB, 575x581, 575:581, the chans.png)

>>11867085

>facebookjak

>integral part of chan culture

>chan culture

kill yourself kike


dc40f6  No.11867145

>>11867133

>wojak isn't part of chan culture

>chan culture isn't real because i say so

ok


b61c1c  No.11867164

File: 8e2b3b639247318⋯.jpg (110.67 KB, 566x720, 283:360, goodnight facebookjak.jpg)

>>11867145

anon you are clearly a newfag. Just because something is old doesn't inherently make it valuable. The value of memetics is that it is constantly in a state of flux, therefore the language is constantly fresh and the enemy cannot adapt to the change quickly enough to keep up with the lingo. The ideals must never be changed. The values should remain pure, but the presentation should always be adapting and competing for survival. Facebookjak is a dead meme, that only jews and sodomites use as a mask to pretend to fit in. Facebookjak is essentially a brand of vapid shallow virtue signaling at this point. It's time to put the dead meme out to pasture.


cf112d  No.11867352

>>11867164

Says the guy still posting that polonskaya bimbo

>>11867070


b61c1c  No.11867382

File: 5ae2f82277bec0e⋯.png (88.43 KB, 634x695, 634:695, time to go back facebookja….png)

>>11867352

touche, but my overarching point still stands.


95b88e  No.11867498

blart, how mad are you that you lost your board?


2bc5ce  No.11867770

File: 6a1fb84a1a2ec54⋯.png (45.39 KB, 616x617, 616:617, 8ch-inoperable.png)


2bc5ce  No.11867796

>>11865135

Muh kampfy, the stuff they are bitching about in that image is infinitely less damaging to white genocide resistance than the current state of the board where its one big JTRIG disruption tactics circle jerk.


aac34f  No.11867816

>>11867770

Kek you're so assmad you're memeing against your old stomping grounds. Zero effort memes too. You might enjoy /qresearch/ better.


2bc5ce  No.11868141

>>11867816

Actually youre the one shilling for TRS


8ae01b  No.11868151

>>11867796

So report threads that violate our precepts.


af3c2b  No.11868184


8ae01b  No.11868202

>>11868184

That’s not a thread, and it clearly doesn’t violate anything.


12a361  No.11868799

File: c50c77aeb7b3f2b⋯.png (284.4 KB, 974x1627, 974:1627, Jan 2015 Hotpocket outing ….png)


b61c1c  No.11868865

File: 8afe8caa43b7353⋯.png (490.64 KB, 1903x4323, 173:393, 8afe8caa43b7353652a68c1399….png)


2bc5ce  No.11870243

>>11868865

Youre right, only the TRS shills from that multi-year old image would be happy that they are no longer being banned, they should go back to facebook.


cf112d  No.11870796

File: 2215b68cc98a8fc⋯.jpg (47.74 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault.jpg)

>>11870243

>kamphaggot is still here

JUST


cf112d  No.11870811

But yeah, banning TRS sodomites was one of the few things you did right.


8ae01b  No.11870991

>>11870243

Reminder that you are completely castrated and you will never have any power ever again.


1779d0  No.11871126

-who are the mods

-what do they stand for

-what/who do they ban

-what are the rules of the board now

?

thx


040412  No.11871700

>>11871126

>-who are the mods

Noone knows. Presumably, three /pol/ users.

>-what do they stand for

Keeping the light rules by CM enforced

>-what/who do they ban

essentially just excessive spam and people who spam on their first post

>-what are the rules of the board now

See the OP of this thread


f6a956  No.11872728

blart / rach / impkampfy,

How mad are you that you lost your board?


dc596b  No.11875277

There's a thread up r ight now that is a great example of everything current wrong with h8/pol/'s moderation.

OP made three posts

>>11874915

>>11874932

>>11874943

then disappeared.

Then this faggot showed up

>a15e48

>32 of 79 replies = 40%

>>11875255

>>11875253

>>11875245

>>11875240

>>11875238

>>11875229

>>11875219

>>11875202

>>11875190

>>11875169

>>11875165

>>11875160

>>11875144

>>11875134

>>11875126

>>11875123

>>11875116

>>11875114

>>11875111

>>11875107

>>11875098

>>11875093

>>11875074

>>11875066

>>11875057

>>11875056

>>11875054

>>11875052

>>11875051

>>11875049

>>11875047

There needs to be an addition to the rules in the context of baitposting.


dc596b  No.11875295

>>11854326

>giving up after being totally fucking destroyed

Thanks for playing.

>>11856111

>last post on that ID

>>11858276

<first post on this ID

I wonder how many IDs you're on in this thread...


b56f3c  No.11875299

>>11875277

You think they're the same person?


d963c6  No.11875877

say shit about halfchan get banned there

say shit about trump get banned here

the more things progress, the more people can suck my dick.

chan culture is done, if there ever was such a thing. i arrived "late" but in time to realize i didn't miss shit

now i do what i do since the old c64 days

pirate that shit and enjoy being called a troll

(someone who knows how the world really works and is exiled from society for it)

suck it and good night.


2bc5ce  No.11875990

File: ea8df6e7dcc414f⋯.png (286.74 KB, 419x469, 419:469, Rahowa.png)

We should really have our fucking CSS back, the whole board contributed to those threads over a long period of time and a lot of work was put into them. Chodenigger youre a fucking scumbag.


b56f3c  No.11876027

>>11771709

<Nice dubs Hitler, but no argument.

>the truth

>not an argument

You're right, "the argument" is the rope you'll hang from.


134d2d  No.11876063

>>11875990

>what is custom CSS


8ae01b  No.11876102

>>11875295

>took five days to reply

>has absolutely no fucking argument

You’re so pathetic. Fuck off.


8ae01b  No.11876109

>>11875877

>say shit about halfchan get banned there

That’s why we left four years ago.

>say shit about trump get banned here

Kikey’s gone. You can tell the truth about Trump again.

>the more things progress, the more people can suck my dick.

So do something in the real world.

>a troll (someone who knows how the world really works and is exiled from society for it)

lol no


f46a81  No.11876930

>>11875877

>chan culture is done, if there ever was such a thing. i arrived "late" but in time to realize i didn't miss shit

Image boards are intelligence agency psyops.

Who do you think Jim Watkins works for?

Who do you think Christopher Poole works for?

Who do you think Hiroyuki Nishimura works for?


7c364f  No.11877245

So why are you not banning hasbarafag?


7c364f  No.11877299

>>11876930

>still reddit spacing

>posted 6 times in a row in the Redice thread

>Still hawking his unsubstantiated claims


d107fb  No.11877356

>Thread about good colored people is deleted

Literally why? Nothing in the rules against it.


8ae01b  No.11877368

>>11877356

They don’t exist, first of all.


d107fb  No.11877396

File: c0ed62c092b7988⋯.jpg (81.7 KB, 596x768, 149:192, f26407744.jpg)

File: 8dee3584217114f⋯.jpg (44.94 KB, 513x600, 171:200, f27082368.jpg)

File: f0e043d7c663a1d⋯.jpg (338.45 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, 4.jpg)

>>11877368

>Implying Hitler didn't have blacks and arabs in his armies

>Implying there weren't blacks and arabs who didn't help elect Trump

Are you saying that there isn't one good colored person at all?


8ae01b  No.11877430

>>11877396

>Implying Hitler didn't have blacks and arabs in his armies

>Implying there weren’t blacks and arabs who didn’t help elect Trump

Great strawmen. Great examples of strawmen, that is; they’re not great at doing what you intend them to do.

>Are you saying that there isn’t one good colored person at all?

Yes. Go NAXALT somewhere else.


7c364f  No.11877438

>>11877356

>>11877396

Because it was a no effort slide thread, m8.

I'm sure you are used to those at

>>>/cuckchan/

tho.


f46a81  No.11877512

File: e8f2b3a76ed5457⋯.jpg (61.94 KB, 785x405, 157:81, 8chan WN Retard Bus.jpg)

>>11877299

>Not being aware of all the evidence that Jim Watkins and Hiroyuki Nishimura are US/Japanese government intelligence assets.


8ae01b  No.11877526

>>11877512

>still posting here, if that’s the case

You don’t do a very good job.


d84033  No.11877848

>>11877512

Why are you here if you hate WN/Natsoc anyway?


1c8f86  No.11878154

Thank you polvol2 for revoking my 7 day ban. Meant to post this yesterday but was sleepy


ce043b  No.11878979

>>11829957

It's a child you lying fuck and no one is going to believe you ever.


2bc5ce  No.11879390

File: 8731ac537603a8b⋯.png (2.09 MB, 971x1226, 971:1226, TRS-nazbol-traitor-fucks.png)

>>11877396

TRS you are not welcome among whites.


cf112d  No.11879421

So, why do you not ban hasbarafag? Is he on the mod team?


cf112d  No.11879427

>>11879390

>when you thought TRS couldn't get any faggier

wew lad


b56f3c  No.11879682

File: 0853cf66e669dba⋯.png (21.58 KB, 633x758, 633:758, 1431857611692.png)

>>11877356

my thread about based blacks is deleted!


62bb71  No.11880021

File: 98eba5a4d7508d9⋯.jpg (25.53 KB, 586x300, 293:150, Richard Spencer questionin….jpg)

Why do people who hate TRS use their (((echo))) meme?


1efd42  No.11880028

File: 7c50116ad2b22a2⋯.jpg (408.11 KB, 1600x1438, 800:719, of the lost war for surviv….jpg)

>>11877396

>>Are you saying that there isn't one good colored person at all?

Yes and for millennia our race understood this to be true, its why it has existed and still exists. Once you get the "noble savage" mentality of, "we're all the same", "we can help them to be like us", "they just don't know any better", "we can teach them to be better" or "we haven't done enough to help them" you've lost, because the necessary work to fix the situation means forcing Whites to think beyond the easy lifestyle they are enjoying and while whites are a large enough block to generate such a lifestyle they won't turn from it.

It has never been possible through all the times that we have fallen into this to convince enough Whites that they cannot allow themselves to live under the same roof as other races because aren't receptive to bad feelings then, they are snooty and act out debasement to show you that their depravity isn't as bad as you make it out to be. Now once we have ourselves into this state there are only two ways we have ever come up in surviving this calamity. The first way is fleeing from the degenerates, which has happened many times but now there is no frontier, so its probably not possible anymore. The second way is to make the calamity happen before it would happen otherwise so that we have enough people to fight and win it for ourselves, that is solution by DOTR.


b56f3c  No.11880029

>>11880021

Because it's not (((theirs))) they just memed it.


cf112d  No.11880030

>>11880021

>if you don't like a place, you can't use memes from there

Not how it works. I use cuckchan memes occasionally. That echo was literally the only good meme that TRS came up with in their 6+ years of existence.


2bc5ce  No.11880252

File: fa6991fa44373c8⋯.jpg (40.79 KB, 507x756, 169:252, richard-spencer4.jpg)

>>11880021

You stole our entire culture while pushing marxism and bolshevism, and now youre kvetching that the echo meme is used outside TRS.


71f846  No.11880272

>>11880252

They absolutely screw everyone and give no credit for anything. I have heard these motherfuckers use /pol/ jokes and even /tv/ jokes before. Then they simultaneously refuse to mention our existence. Not to mention that spencer is doomed now because he can't into OC and nobody wants to hear him talk after all the controversy has died down.


8ae01b  No.11880280

>>11880021

I appreciate the echoes for the sole reason that it caused the ADL (or was it the ACLU) to declare punctuation marks to be “hate speech.” It is now illegal in Europe, Canada, and Australia (et. al.) to put three opening or closing parentheses together when writing. So ever since that ruling, I’ve always wrapped jewish names in the star of remphan. They will never make their own symbol “hate speech,” and no one here should be afraid to literally name the jew anymore.

All of my devices autocorrect the echoes to a simple ✡. This character is U+2721. Some places show it as the emoji version, some places show it as the raw text version. I can’t control that (though there are some Unicode input schemes that can). Either way, POINT TO THEM AND CALL THEM BY THEIR FIRST FUCKING NAME.


cf112d  No.11880287

>>11880252

>>11880272

Remember what Kike Enoch did to Its OK to be White?


2bc5ce  No.11881043

File: ebe596ec643e059⋯.png (27.25 KB, 789x252, 263:84, Nick-Fuentes.png)

File: 824ddbcd488ed75⋯.png (139.4 KB, 796x285, 796:285, Mike-Enoch-Against-IOTBW.png)

>>11880272

They sure do.

>>11880287

Pretty sure he tried to take credit for it after countersignalling it but I only have the one where he countersignalled it.


1f4bba  No.11881302

File: c87c1c2848fc108⋯.jpg (68.1 KB, 960x854, 480:427, DhiAloFUEAEm4Mk.jpg)

>>11880252

The chans had nothing to do with the success of Trump and Trump memes online, it was all based black men and kosher civnats on Twitter that did it. So fuck off Nazi.


8ae01b  No.11881318

>>11881302

Ironic shitposting = shitposting.


647d14  No.11881598

>>11881318

Nope, I guarantee that faggot is serious. Too many

based

Threads around here lately.


779525  No.11881882

File: dc0373d7e2442f0⋯.jpg (1.7 MB, 2048x1536, 4:3, f27912192.jpg)

>>11881598

Fuck niggers. In fact, fuck every pesron who is not Aryan. There is not a single nigger worthy of thinking about, and people who try to say otherwise are likely a) controlled opposition or b) shills.

Jews dilute our ranks with multiculturalism, so we can't let any niggers on here.


fd2bfe  No.11883152


2bc5ce  No.11883315

File: 6d36f33b826dc07⋯.png (23.62 KB, 732x173, 732:173, Based-Billy-Roper2.PNG)


946eb9  No.11883638

>>11881302

Nah, kill yourself Tyrone.


946eb9  No.11883645

>>11880021

Why did the jews at TRS steal… oh wait. Fuck off Levi.


cf112d  No.11883693

>>11883315

Someone posted Roper's 'Hasten the Day' in the book thread. I read it, and it was pretty good,other then the Christian Identity parts.


2bc5ce  No.11883789

>>11883693

You have the pdf?


cf112d  No.11883815

>>11883789

I have a link (you can only post a file one time on /pol/, if you try to post it again, you get "file already exists".

>>>/pol/11879319


2bc5ce  No.11883862

>>11883815

Appreciated


cf112d  No.11883921

Why did you lock the thread about the bots shilling?


040412  No.11884060

>>11883921

>bots shilling

In other news, water wet


000000  No.11884351

Mods, anons. The JIDF-Mossad is running a new operation on /pol/

Today at about 8:00am to 1:00pm Tel Aviv time (low traffic for US and EU since it's about 5am in US) JIDF-Mossad coordinated another attack on /pol/. They started spamming the board with threads containing underage female anime and anime in general.

Their operation goals are:

1. associating /pol/ with pedos

2. tricking /pol/acks into posting CP or borderline CP

3. using anime as a fracture point

>I hate anime! I only see underage anime girls lately

<anime is fine! no you don't

Don't take the bait, fags.

4. using pedophilia 'inaction' as fracture point

>I won't post underage girls to expose podesta

<you don't support fight against pedos!

5. using pedophilia definition as a fracture point

>16+ is not pedo!

<yes it is!

6. possession of CP (when keeping backup or archiving etc. make sure you label it "evidence of Mossad's child pornography operations" or smth)

Examples of posted OPs:

OP: 4 underage girls in pic

>>11882050

>Why is she of consent reform such a controversial issue amongst the indotricated masses?

OP: let's try a pedo related operation against shills

>>11882038

Spammed with underage girls by (((anons))). Many child erotica posts have been deleted.

Shill OP says:

>There is ONE way to destroy all shills.

>All shill posts will lose 100% of funding. Not gore. Post pedogate with no topical response. Fill the posts with pedogate. It sinks them every time.

So by flooding /pol/ on our own with borderline-CP (b-CP for short) we will force shills to not get paid???? JIDF IQ < 80

No, /pol/acks posting b-CP for whatever reason will be just that, b-CP.

<b..but i mean accompany b-CP with images of podesta!

Got it, post b-CP + podesta. It still contains b-CP, shill. Oh wait, pedogate is the pretext so that your shills can start encouraging us by example. Got it, thanks.

Comment by another JIDF shill:

>>11882329

>I'm getting my masters in neurology and were studying pedophilia right now. Turns out it's completely natural and normal and healthy for kids.

(((organic))) or what!!1!

OP: I'll D&C you with Trump. Posts female anime image

>>11881891

Female underage anime. (((Coincidence)))

OP: GUARDIAN OF THE GALAXY DIRECTOR PEDO

>>11882146

Pedo related thread, another (((coincidence))).

OP: crap thread; pic of adult female semi-naked suggestive

>>11882461

6th (((Coincidence))).

Multiple more shit quality anime threads (((organically))) popping up in the same timeframe.

3 hours later JIDF posts >>11883036

>the fuck was that?

>https://archive.is/h5m7l

>three bots going all out, over 300+ spam postings and no mod banning the spam ip's?

>seems they don't like it if anons draw anttention to the pedo problem

(great format shill)

>>11883144 (shill comment in that thread)

>if you are not willing to fight back and kill those pedos by dropping truth pills and facts i have to consider this board as pro-pedo

>prove me wrong please, anon.

God are you retarded?! Wtf is this, try harder you inbred shills! You are a disgrace to your people!

>unless you do spam b-CP as I say, you are pedophiles!

I pity you. This is pathetic.

[to be continued]


000000  No.11884352

Notable comments by real anons:

>>11882218

JIDF-Mossad operation: /pol/ is pedo

OP sets it up. Then some (((anons))) start posting suggestive underage girls (not exactly CP, since it would be too obvious).

There was a similar JIDF-Mossad operation a while ago with anime suggestive underage girls accompanied by (((anons))) saying "pedophilia is OK guys". They were exposed again and ridiculed. They slightly improved this time; instead of posting during extremely low traffic Sunday morning (Tel Aviv local time), they posted Friday morning.

Archive such operations, anons. Also encrypt and backup, store them on DVD and hide it. When Mossad is revealed for promoting terrorism, felonies, hate-crimes and pedophilia it will be epic!

<we won't be exposed, goyim!

<what is a zombie-honeypot?

Eventually their IP addresses will leak. Imagine the headlines around the world:

>Mossad (through JIDF) was promoting terrorism and pedophilia

>They were also posting antisemitic content on WN sites

>and encouraged terrorism against jewish and muslim individuals

Your credibility drops to 0. Your 'but they suffered in WW2' is gone. Please, by all means, do continue such operations on /pol/.

and >>11882275

>the funny thing is im working on my homework right now (BS in Crim Justice) and the topic is child molesters. OP is suggesting that we post a type of child porn that is referred to as “child erotica.” OP is either a fed or even worse, a molester. OP needs to have his throat cut.

and finally previous pedo-operation being exposed on this >>11732044 Meta Thread on 06/17/18 (Sun) morning (Israel local time; Sunday is working day in Israel). About 10 underage female anime threads in a few hours plus pro-pedo JIDF shills.


d107fb  No.11884384

>>11819601

Hm, interesting


d107fb  No.11884417

>>11884403

Can we not post at all after your posts then? If so, well then excuuuse me.


000000  No.11884459

Get in here /pol/, Mossad visited at 5:00am US time.

>>11884351

>>11884352


b56f3c  No.11884524

Can I pay to be the B.O.?


d107fb  No.11884534

>>11884524

I'm sure with enough money you can accomplish anything.


cf112d  No.11884540

>>11884524

If you aren't jewish, I wouldn't bother.


000000  No.11884563

Get in here /pol/, Mossad visited at 5:00am US time.

>>11884351

>>11884352

>>11884403

shills are abusing the "last visible post" of meta, to hide the above.


d107fb  No.11884569

File: 68e4d4d6cb47790⋯.gif (11.16 KB, 501x585, 167:195, edc1bf47088094074459024c20….gif)

>>11884563

Listen, ya goy! We ain't gotsa the patience for meshuggenas like you to be runnin around spreadin around ya nonsense, got it? We tryin ta do somethan hee and ya ain't lettin us do! So scram!


b56f3c  No.11884637

>>11884540

I'm not.

>>11884534

Do you think emailing chodemonkey would net me a response?


779525  No.11884730

>>11884637

You should try it. Make sure to give him a firm handshake first and make eye contact though.


000000  No.11884746

Check Mossad's operation today and laugh at the shills.

>>11884351

>>11884352

>>11884403

CTRL + F meshuggenas, do know what it means /pol/? How many times have you seen it on /pol/?Let me help you, duckduckgo the following: meshuggener site:8ch.net/pol


779525  No.11884768

File: 4836dfbf94a9c52⋯.png (2.69 MB, 1701x8000, 1701:8000, 3bMRKb.png)

>>11884746

>Using CuckCuckNo

Nice try, evil kike


558a0d  No.11885211

>>11884768

<imgur filename

>>>/reddit/

While I reccomend against using DDG, there are a few mistakes with that infographic.

>it uses nginx therefore it uses a SSL termination proxy

Nginx is just a web server. While its possible to configure it to act as one, most people don't. Regardless there isn't a problem with a ssl termination proxy as the unencrypted data is on a network between servers in a datacenter and not over the internet.

>It knows my user agent or IP

It doesn't need to store this information to do that. You are sending that information to the server when you are making the request. It's just echoing it back.


5b870b  No.11885543

File: f6fb9d550f45328⋯.jpg (1.18 MB, 2476x2928, 619:732, nupol5.jpg)

File: c0b62f5f253f9e9⋯.png (46.27 KB, 258x330, 43:55, 02e6144a9d1f6be4ad84e08624….png)

For fucks sake why is polvol2 still around?


b56f3c  No.11885601

>>11885211

>ignoring the content of a post or image due to file name or formatting

If I ever seen a jew react predictably to anything in any way, it's that way.


d107fb  No.11885604

>>11885211

>((((1))))

Nice try, kikealicious


dc596b  No.11885768

File: f0b1e936c8f3f3a⋯.jpg (1.35 MB, 2552x2856, 319:357, nupol 6 - it all makes sen….jpg)

My God… It all makes sense now.


134d2d  No.11885813

>>11885768

Fuck off kikey. You are castrated now.


8ae01b  No.11885815

>>11885768

>imkikey is so rectally ravaged that he autistically trolls the meta thread since the day he was outsted

>imkikey is so ass-blasted that he continues to make retarded compilation images with text stretching

>imkikey is so shitter-shattered that he autistically spergs out every time he’s banned

>imkikey hates being castrated so much that he’s the one behind all the attacks on the new mods

Yes. It DOES all make sense now, doesn’t it? Don’t spam and you won’t be banned. If this is too complicated for you to comprehend, perhaps reddit is more your speed? In fact, don’t post anymore at all. We know it’s you. Every time.


779525  No.11885818

>>11885768

God damn kikes…. how do we take them does?


dc596b  No.11885957

File: 62157cf92ccc017⋯.jpg (2 MB, 2552x4264, 319:533, nupol 6 - it all makes sen….jpg)

>>11885815

Yeah, seems legit.

One question though: Which one of the people you've accused of being kikey is actually kikey?

>>11854219

All of them? Or maybe none?


134d2d  No.11885984

>>11885957

YOU ARE CASTRATED

YOU WILL NEVER HAVE POWER AGAIN

FUCK OFF KIKEY


dc596b  No.11885991

>>11885984

Thats nice dear. Which mod are you btw?

I know that other fag is polvol2, but are you just a proxy or just a little stooge in loyal service?

(Protip: polvol2 aka a96bda aka 8ae01b is imkampfy.)


8ae01b  No.11886002

>>11885957

Well, you know quite well how schizophrenic kikey was. Do you really expect that to change after his ousting?

>>11885991

>the people who most hate kikey are kikey

>watch as I abjectly refuse to type my name–I MEAN HIS NAME–incorrectly

Yes, we really believe you. Thank you for exposing that kikey's the one behind all the attacks on the new mods.


2bc5ce  No.11886008

>>11885543

Yea, thats pretty solid evidence that hes covering for niggerdickposters, which is exactly what Chodenigger chimped out about being banned.


8ae01b  No.11886021

File: cb51845b4df094c⋯.jpg (613.89 KB, 1293x568, 1293:568, cb51845b4df094cba004740aab….jpg)

File: cb51845b4df094c⋯.jpg (613.89 KB, 1293x568, 1293:568, cb51845b4df094cba004740aab….jpg)

>>11886008

>oy vey i changed my IP again

>unfortunately it's one of the ones i used before

>but no one will notice, right

REMINDER THAT THIS IS ALSO IMKIKEY, ATTEMPTING TO CREATE A FALSE CONSENSUS, JUST LIKE HE LIED ABOUT DOING EARLIER.


dc596b  No.11886028

>>11777233

>>11777250

>>11777304

>>11781904

>>11781922

>>11810550

>>11860895

>>11876063

A fascinating posting history.

I wonder which mod was on at... What is that? Round about 6PM on Wednesday?

Checking the board log:

>https://8ch.net/log.php?page=2&board=pol

>https://8ch.net/log.php?page=3&board=pol

Plenty of polvol2 activity, but also a significant appearance by polvol1 (looks like mostly in the AM) and then polvol3 comes in later on.

But judging by the scope of the "3 days ago" category, I'm gonna go ahead and guess you're polvol3, as you and pv2 had a lot of overlap in the section that looks to be about mid-evening, while pv1 seems to be more segregated in activity from pv2/3.

I wonder if polvol2 was active around that t-

>>11876102

>>11876109

Hah, well, would ya lookit that.

>>11885813

>>11885984

A fascinating little posting history you've got there, polvol3.

>>11886002

>>11886021

Shut up kikey.

>>11886008

He never liked me very much, because I AM autistic as fuck and I DO observe the board log and that has ALWAYS pissed him the fuck off.


2bc5ce  No.11886033

>>11886021

>mod refuses to ban niggerdick and racemixing memes

>spoilers them instead demonstrating he is aware of them

Shills defend this.


dc596b  No.11886044

>>11886033

>Mods who masquerade as anons AND acts as shills defend this.

Checked for ftfy


134d2d  No.11886082

YOU'RE FUCKING

C A S T R A T E D

A S T R A T E D

S T R A T E D

T R A T E D

R A T E D

A T E D

T E D

E D

D

KIKEY, U MAD?


8ae01b  No.11886088

>>11886044

>mods who masquerade as anons

The kikey cries out in pain as he strikes you, and as he replies to himself.


2bc5ce  No.11886131

>>11886088

So its kampfys fault now that mods are refusing to remove niggerdicks and racemixing spam. No one is falling for this trash, if anyone is masquerading as anons its chodenigger, defending this literal atrocity on whites.


8ae01b  No.11886147

>>11886131

>So its kampfys fault

You never were very good at reading, were you kikey? Where's your outrage at all the images in the black crime thread?


dc596b  No.11886171

>>11886088

Checked for shut up kikey, dubs purposefully acquired mean nothing.

>>11886131

>>11886147

See what he did here? You basically said "How is this scapegoat you keep hiding behind (which is you) to blame for the people, who you claim are distinct from this scapegoat (which is still you), acting in an unacceptable manner?" and his response? Focus entirely on the mention of the scapegoat and completely ignore the question.

And then he pulls in a bait question at the end, to trigger emotion and drag conversation further away from the question that remains unanswered.

This is fucking textbook shilling, and absolutely fascinating to watch once the proper context has been established. Makes so much sense.


8ae01b  No.11886200

>>11886171

>and his response

To ignore the strawman you created out of thin air. Because I'm not going to entertain your bullshit. I'm only going to laugh at you.

>Focus entirely on the mention of the scapegoat

Reject it entirely, rather.

>And then he pulls in a bait question

Nope, directly relates to the topic at hand. Why can't you answer it?


dc596b  No.11886217

>>11886200

You created an obviously flawed argument in the first part, a nonsensical argument in the second, and followed up with yet another bait question.

Textbook.

You still haven't answered the question posed to you initially. Fascinating.


8ae01b  No.11886371

>>11886217

>obviously flawd argument

Which part?

>a nonsensical argument

In what way?

>followed up with yet another bait question.

So you can't account for your hypocrisy with regard to the thread, then.


2bc5ce  No.11886376

>>11886171

So youre saying polvol2 is kampfy and hes behind the niggerdick threads.


8ae01b  No.11886447

>>11886376

We already know it's you, you fucking lunatic. You outed yourself days ago: >>11886021


93f73b  No.11886510

>>11886447

Where is the connection between those posts and polvol2?


93f73b  No.11886692

>>11886559

Then post them again, autie.


000000  No.11886741

>>11886692

>then post it again

No point. They will flood the thread again. Mods need to take action, I don't have the tools to stop such kind of spam. The best I can do is have enough non-shills read the message and they probably have.

If you believe it should be reposted, please do.


040412  No.11887020

>kikey banned people and deleted posts

>new mods do the same

>new mods are kikey

>if you disagree you are kikey/a mod

flawless logic


adf70d  No.11887838

File: e341aad3c97efc8⋯.jpg (2.91 KB, 125x93, 125:93, hotbabes.jpg)

>leftist site ownership

>they dislike right wing board

>they take it over in the name of free-speech

>establish a dictatorship

>the board is now total chaos that makes it impossible to have discussions

Well played comrade.


8ae01b  No.11888023

>>11887838

Changed your IP again, I see. Keep crying.


adf70d  No.11888215

>>11888023

Kill yourself fat retarded american.


040412  No.11888231

>>11887838

>I can't have a discussion when people disagree with me

>hotbabes.jpg

Chaim pls


a34316  No.11888325

>>11887838

Hey jew


cf112d  No.11888762

>>11888215

Fuck off greekfag


cf112d  No.11888771

Also

castrated


2bc5ce  No.11889155

File: a729e4a6955c5d3⋯.png (274.93 KB, 494x380, 13:10, retard10.PNG)

>>11886447

support ≠ being whos supported, your baseless accusations are typical of the cancer that deserves to be banned.


8ae01b  No.11889234

>>11889155

>a single user here ever supported kikey

You are clinically insane.


fc6a2f  No.11889805

What do you do about people who don't have an argument and just start image dumping?


9ed6f7  No.11889878

File: b47a3fe1087a28c⋯.png (3.38 KB, 172x175, 172:175, fID.png)

>>11889805

Filter their ID.


f2c3c4  No.11890178

File: e060282f4a60572⋯.png (270.6 KB, 2556x1280, 639:320, ClipboardImage.png)

>>11889878

>just ignore the problem

In this case that's the thing, but what long term?


f393bc  No.11890228

File: 88cfc7b42a56645⋯.jpg (183.37 KB, 800x869, 800:869, jewsaredyingout.jpg)


649aa5  No.11890322

>>11890228

Perhaps they are so disoriented they mistook the vagoo for a piggy bank and filled it up with shekels.


b55796  No.11890519

>>11890228

Those Jewish demographic statistics are all bullshit and have about as much validity as the Holocaust gas chamber hoax.


b55796  No.11890530

>>11887838

Get fucked, blart / rach / imkampfy.


f568de  No.11890979

>>11622450

What do each of these mean on the threads?

R: 96 / S: 0 / M: 27k / E: 27

I have them as Replies, Sages, M?, E? Energy (if correct; what exactly does Energy mean in terms of the thread)


9ed6f7  No.11891409

>>11891307

Sperging in a sea of spergs.


4df1fd  No.11891413

File: c50a0fec8969785⋯.png (497.67 KB, 472x625, 472:625, c50a0fec8969785ef72a55ae7e….png)

Can something finally be done about the schizophrenic shitposter known as "Ashes and Echoes"? This faggot has been spamming the board for years now. He constantly accuses any anon he doesn't like of being the figment of his imagination that tortures him, and gives it a familiar face. First he said we were some dude from TRS he didn't like, then we were all "Smiley" from fringe, and now everyone is some random nobody named "Robert Sepher". Any half decent /pol/ack should be able to spot his shitposting anywhere. >>11793295 This looks a lot like the blackpilled faggot. Note the excessive red text.

>>11891153

>>11891288 (same thread, different IP)


4df1fd  No.11891438

File: 0cb2737030f0978⋯.png (137.73 KB, 825x416, 825:416, Screenshot from 2018-07-22….png)

>>11891413

Here, this is the schizophrenic's standard response to just about everything.


8dd8fa  No.11891537

I would like the mods and anons at /pol/ who can investigate to investigate the source of the images that the schizo jew shills are posting, you know Trump wall, Orban shaking hands with Bibi, the TRS shops with the jew noses and jew hats, they always post these in every threads.

They are obviously shill pictures but who make them? Because they all look similar.


040412  No.11891728

File: a208fa5ad2598d4⋯.jpg (259.94 KB, 2480x2480, 1:1, 1466473204941-3.jpg)

>>11891677

>someone posts smug6000000.jpg

>you sperg out about it

>everyone smugs at you

maybe you're the problem goon-kun


9ed6f7  No.11891757

>>11891677

>He wants to take /pol/ seriously

horrysheet.jpg


8ae01b  No.11892028

>>11891413

>Ashes and Echoes

He’s banned on sight. It’s obviously a literally paid shill, since it’s too retarded to change its verbiage. It always exposes itself with common words and phrases, so please do report it when you see it.


4df1fd  No.11892552

>>11892028

>banned on sight

Any proof? His shitposts flood over ths board constantly and even if he is banned, the posts are always left up to shit up the threada. This weak handed moderation is why the board is in it's death throws. Now PPH are under a hundred. Everyone is moving on now.


3f8d91  No.11892562

File: 7d2b099e7f420ad⋯.png (5.19 KB, 713x84, 713:84, oh no, brown eyes.png)

What the fuck is going on with this board, /pol/ is essentially becoming a parody of itself, just look at that "History of everything and more" thread, I've never seen so much hot garbage in one place, between the baseless claims of "we wuz" you have posts like picture related. One thing is to claim the Aryans once lived somewhere like the Middle east, but another thing is to say "we wuz semites". What is going here, are these people shills, or just 16 year olds who just discovered /pol/? Why are not dealing with these people, I swear their stupidity is leaking into other boards.


8ae01b  No.11892715

>>11892552

>Any proof

Yes?

>Flood over the board constantly

Report his posts whenever you see them.

>this weak-handed moderation

Mention that to CM. See if he’ll loosen up.

>>11892562

The question we have to decide regards which is more important: truth or freedom.

As the entire fucking Internet censors, deletes, or bans our speech in one form or another, simply because it’s true (or goes against a narrative), I have always tended toward the belief that we must uphold truth here. To that end, the deletion of things which are not truth would have to happen. How do we determine truth? The scientific method, of course. But should we be forced to REdetermine truth every single fucking day? Of course not. That’s why I think we should establish a form of “lurk more” as a rule. Don’t waste your time on unorganized pursuits, but visit >>>/polarchive/ where common truths are all organized and gathered. That’s the intention of the place, of course. If you see a lie there, report it with a citation and it will be removed. If we want to treat /pol/ as “truth only,” and we have a repository OF truth in /polarchive/, then the management of /pol/ can be toward discovering new truths and building on existing ones.

But that’s not how things are right now. See the “word of SO” in the OP here: “free speech-oriented.” Old /pol/acks know what that implies, and it scares us. Hell, look at the number of reddit-tier threads that get posted here. It’s definitely redditors; few other groups espouse their thoughts that way, and those that do are hard left and are so weak that they’d vomit just from posting here.

Anyway, make sure to tell CM your thoughts. We have to decide where we want /pol/ to go. I’m of the mind that “free speech” (can’t put enough quotes around that) is the death of truth, at least in the world as it is today.


3f8d91  No.11892759

>>11892715

I just want all these idiots to stop fucking posting. It's not even about a difference of opinion, it's just that, there's all these idiots, who come into /pol/ parrot our talking points without thinking about what they really mean, and then when that's not enough, they try and one up each other with shit like:

>What do we do with the non-white population?

<Let's deport them

>Sounds reasonable

<No wait, let's kill them all race war now 14/88

This is why the left has been losing momentum, they've been trying too hard to one up each other in there, and now they sound like idiots without an idea of what to do:

>What makes a person white?

<Here's a genetic study that shows that Europeans of all nationalities cluster in together, signifying one race.

>Fair enough

<No wait, you can only be white of you're X Nationality

>Okay then?

<No wait, you must have these few traits in order to be white

Eventually this board is going to become the living parody of /pol/ with idiots trying to engage in politics that they do not understand, among a sea of shills that just lead them into more dumb and extremist views that would be impossible to apply in real life and eventually kill all the momentum /pol/ has ever had. An ideology is meaningless if it's parroted without understanding, or if its taken to an improbable extreme.


4df1fd  No.11892806

>>11892715

I have reported, and all that happens is a meaningless ban while the shill-spam stays up. It has zero effect unless his posts are deleted, as he just hops to another IP. In fact I doubt he even waits for the bans all the time anymore.

last post in the chain was me as well, just on my shitposting device.


8ae01b  No.11892811

>>11892759

>parrot our talking points without thinking about what they mean

>they try to one up each other

Ah, exactly. The problem (for them) is that we don’t tend to speak every single point of what we have as “common knowledge.” We don’t NEED to, because we have a preexisting understanding of “if X then Y” such that it would be a waste of our time to do so. For newfags (and “fashy” LARPers), that translates into them not understanding the scope and timeframe of our goals, and thus think we’re all just playing. Let’s take your example.

We know that the most important thing for us RIGHT NOW is the restoration of white nations. What is a white nation? A nation without nonwhites. “But but but but there are a lot of nonwhites in white nations right now! That means we have to kill them all immediately, and anything short of conditions that let us kill them is no good!” Or so they say. What they fail to understand is that the extermination of all nonwhites from Earth entirely is a NATURAL CONSEQUENCE OF the restoration of white racial solidarity, and not a prerequisite thereof. Darwin even wrote of this, for fuck’s sake. “Within the next few centuries, there’s no way to avoid the idea that whites will—by the nature of their superiority—exterminate the blacks, et. al.” or some such. “But but but but but nonwhites won’t PEACEFULLY leave white nations!” they say. And yeah, the vast majority of them won’t. That’s what we call THE RACE WAR, and that’s why we WANT the race war: because we want them out as quickly as possible (because we only have 20 years left, maximum), while whites still have the power to WIN the war. We don’t necessarily WANT war as a concept, we want the war to serve our ends.

>what makes a person white

And while that’s an equal example of the reduction ad absurdum fallacy, jews are instrumental in pushing it. Where the first one is mostly idiots who don’t have the intellectual acumen to sit down and work out a problem from start to finish, jews love white D&C. They’ve been pushing this shit for centuries.

But yeah, either we get rid of that shit or /pol/ falls into uselessness of the same kind as under kikey.


4df1fd  No.11892883

>>11892811

How do you expect to accomplish this, when this board has been reduced to a slower version of halfchan where we're actually necessitated to redpill the choir?


eda74a  No.11893011

>>11892759

>Eventually this board is going to become the living parody of /pol/

/pol/ is the living parody of /pol/.


eda74a  No.11893027

>>11892811

Your cult is a NATO military intelligence social psychology experiment.


9fe478  No.11893406

THERE IS A NECROBUMP SHILL EPIDEMIC

FAGGOT MODS KEEP DISMISSING MY REPORTS AND ALLOWING IT TO CONTINUE

SHILLS ARE NOW MODDING /pol/?


4df1fd  No.11893553

>>11893406

Go back to reddit, faggot.


362d55  No.11893969

>>11893553

he's right though, shit over a month old needs to be anchored unless the topic is a legit on-going dig thread. Personally I use the catalog anyway to look for new threads but still.


dc596b  No.11894880

File: c3aec691addb7da⋯.jpg (671.63 KB, 2600x948, 650:237, nupol7.jpg)

File: c0b62f5f253f9e9⋯.png (46.27 KB, 258x330, 43:55, 02e6144a9d1f6be4ad84e08624….png)

>>11894504

>>11894868

No, really, why?


dc596b  No.11894888

>>11886376

Yeah, sure seems like it.

>>11894880


f568de  No.11895428

>>11894880

Wow, next time I hear some MGTOW faggot promoting a 'male only' utopian society I am going to link him to this... >>11894504 ...the 'male only society' is a positive dream cum true, course, being MGTOW he would probably approve and think it sounds 'great'


000000  No.11896277

>>11895000

As you already know there is an ongoing religious D&C campaign from our good friends at JIDF. Having 10+ active threads with religion or esoteric magic horse crap is as (((organic))) as it gets. Hence, the mods that are eager to eradicate this cancer.

>just ban the shill ID that slides!

30 seconds later he will be bumping with his new ID. I'm not saying it should be bumplocked or that the ID ignored, but the solution proposed is laughable. If anyone has a better idea on how to reduce the effect of shills that do that, go ahead. I'm listening.


4df1fd  No.11896278

>>11895000

Trips confirm. D&C threads have been being anchored and removed. About fucking time.

>>11893969

Fuck off newfag. There is nothing wrong with posting in good threads that slowed down a bit. If you want every thread to last only five minutes, go the fuck back to halfchan where you'll feel at home.


495951  No.11896300

File: 45c985b7dfc04bc⋯.png (201.34 KB, 378x397, 378:397, 45c985b7dfc04bc22ff4e14a09….png)

>>11887838

this is what the roach actually believes


1efd42  No.11896352

>>11887838

>>/pol/ is falling apart, its over, its dead

Hearing this for four years now really forces me to disagree with you.


3517f5  No.11896459

>>11896277

> If anyone has a better idea on how to reduce the effect of shills that do that, go ahead. I'm listening.

How about, actually determining which of those posters are shills, based on what ideas are being promoted and which of those are consistent with other redpills? If you've been in one "religious d&c" thread, viewed the information and evaluated the arguments presented, you will have seen them all. I'm not going to name a side. But I am insisting that the answer is obvious.

The current existing state of these so-called "religious d&c" threads is actually a sign of reluctance on the mods part. They refuse to take action because they themselves are afraid of moderating the discussion; because the redpill throughout this issue is cutting edge. They're inactive in these discussions because of the unprecedented yet simple answer that holds true each time the opposing sides clash. I'm not going to be too harsh but let me put it like this: not all redpills are already known and available to all - it was inevitable that something would come up that warrants serious discussion and evaluation because there is a hard truth to learn.

If you were to catalog a list of things that /pol/ holds true, a canon or curriculum that is part of the redpill, the prevailing answer in those threads has already been reached. It becomes more and more obvious each time. I can't emphasize that enough. The only real problem involved is actually the moderation lapsing on what should be a requirement: keeping up with what it means to be redpilled. In this case with the "religious d&c" threads (which I personally find an unsuitable label), the moderation is lagging behind. Some are probably terrified of the implications. And some maybe have their own agenda regarding which side they're on.

The real resolution throughout all of this will come when the prevailing redpill in these threads is so overtly repeated and dominant that the side the shills' take all of time sticks out so much that even a newb to /pol/ will recognize as wrong. Eventually going against it will be like trying to make a thread warning /pol/ against denying the holocaust and calling for /pol/ to remember the 6 gorillion. I'm serious when I say we're almost there. The sooner that people realize that these threads aren't actually d&c but active attempts to suppress redpills, the quicker we can move past this.


2bc5ce  No.11897338

>>11896277

1 month bans on random cancer, permas on the shill himself, make the subject against the rules for 6 months and ban anyone who talks about it. Welcome to fascism.


2bc5ce  No.11897349

File: ad98775df34de71⋯.jpg (226.75 KB, 500x392, 125:98, JIDF party.jpg)

File: 5fb36b46914f14a⋯.jpg (241.51 KB, 1489x1544, 1489:1544, JIDF.jpg)

>>11895000

>threads that paint Christianity in a negative light


2bc5ce  No.11897656

>>11897480

Yea, imagine how big a part of this board I was before they fucked it up, now half of what I do is in the meta. Chodenigger intentionally ruined this board, theres no other excuse for it.


8ae01b  No.11897862

>>11896362

/pol/ doesn’t have an “official” decision on the status of (or side taken in) religion threads, so anchoring would have been the only thing to do.

>>11896459

>reluctance on the mods’ part

Rather, rules on Codemonkey’s part, as per the OP of the thread.

>>11897656

>ha ha wow imagine how big a part i was

>like imagine if i was the literal god and could delete everything that hurt my feelings

>imagine me, having total control of all discourse on the board, and deleting everything true that i didn’t like

>wow just imagine

>now I’m mostly just here though

>ha ha what a terrible board now

CASTRATED


8ae01b  No.11897871

>>11897708

He was. Then he lost his board. You know what I find both interesting and horrifying? The pajeet “need a girlfriend” spam stopped the day he was outed. This is how clinically insane kikey is. He either paid some other third worlder to spam the board because he needed us to think he was relevant, or he masqueraded as one himself. This is how subhumanly pathetic 2bc5ce is. This is how subhumanly pathetic adf70d is. And who knows how many other IDs in JUST this thread.


cf112d  No.11897927

>>11891438

You want to piss him off? Call him "ZonKuthon" or "the great shingami"


cf112d  No.11898132

>the negress is so butthurt it tripleposts


cf112d  No.11898166

>>11897871

You know "pajeet" still posts on /cow/?


21125a  No.11898404

LAST WARNING MODS

BAN NECROBUMPING AND NIGGERS POSTING 'BUMP'/'BAMP' IN THREADS

IF YOU DON'T, I WILL SIT HERE ALL DAY LONG AUTISTICALLY TURNING THE WHOLE BOARD UPSIDE DOWN

>inb4 we ban you

good luck. I have over 4000 proxies

>inb4 we ban them all

i'll torpost fgts

>>11893969

>shit over a month old needs to be anchored

wut? look, you don't have to anchor threads. just ban ppl for necrobumping and if a torposter does it, then sure bumplock the thread

>>11893553

GTFO summerfag

>>11896278

>There is nothing wrong with posting in good threads that slowed down a bit

uh…

>slowed down a bit

>hasn't been posted in for 4-10 days

pick one

>posting in

>posting 'bamp'

pick one

necrobumping has NEVER been allowed here, summerfag. gb2cuckchan


99090b  No.11898471

>>11898404

Hey nigger, if the thread is in board index, it's still alive.

Bump because it triggers you.


040412  No.11898516

>>11898404

imagine being this autistic


cf112d  No.11898704

requesting cyclical hollywood pedophiles thread due to mass spamming


b56f3c  No.11898751

>>11898704

Sorry for the shill but post everything you have or want to discuss here https://8ch.net/pdwd/index.html

Im trying to get CodeMonkey to revive the old Pedowood322 content there but o far no response.


8ae01b  No.11898761

>>11898404

Knock off the spam or you’ll be banned for it, too.


21125a  No.11899719

>>11898471

hey newfag, if a thread hasn't been bumped in 4+ days and someone bumps it with 'bump' – AND THAT IS ALLOWED – then

NO THREAD WILL EVER GO OFF BOARD INDEX YOU DUMB FUCKING NIGGER

>>11898516

imagine being this jewish

>>11898761

>Knock off the spam or you’ll be banned for it, too

>implying you can ever stop me from posting

last warning, kike. stop the necrobumping or I'll turn the fucking board over, you dumb fucking nigger


040412  No.11899739

>>11899719

>I will destroy this place if I can't have my way

Go suck on a pacifier. Orapply for polvol4 if you think that's how things should be handled, that slot was never filled.


2bc5ce  No.11899841

>>11899719

Some of the threads youre kvetching about have been around since before the mod change and if anything thats indicative of the poor state of the board right now.


8ae01b  No.11900089

>>11899719

>warning

Knock off the spam or you’ll be banned for it, too.


2bc5ce  No.11900152

>>11897708

No one gets paid to oppose white genocide. This place was important to our racial survival and was a powerful tool against the kikes. Now its been.. castrated, you could say.


35f68e  No.11900798

what is a good book for being a better white person and sort of making more white friends and having them also be proud to be white?

I think that is our problem lately..we listen to the media garbage and want to feel bad about it so they dont fear us, then they trample over us.what is a good book for being a better white person and sort of making more white friends and having them also be proud to be white?

I think that is our problem lately..we listen to the media garbage and want to feel bad about it so they dont fear us, then they trample over us.


8ae01b  No.11900815

>>11900152

No one believes or supports you, imkikey.


2bc5ce  No.11901223

File: 525f8ccacded249⋯.jpg (48.51 KB, 405x596, 405:596, look-mom-I-posted-it-again.JPG)


d2adee  No.11901240

>>11901223

kek. kikey completely ran out of gas. Reduced to posting stale memes. Just kys and end it all man. You are not getting your board back


2bc5ce  No.11901358

>>11901240

Larp all you want kiddo, race war is coming and retards like you arent going to make it a week. The reality is that no one gives a flying fuck what you have to say, youre just another lefty/pol/ anti-white.


8ae01b  No.11901466


b56f3c  No.11901472

Is it ok if I say nigger every once in a while?


62a9ea  No.11901923

>>11901472

then, won't you be acting just like a nigger?


654a50  No.11902619

Can IDs be held across thread on /pol/ instead of ID per thread and can filter then work in kind so if I filter someone in thread 902847, they will also be filtered in 902848.

Can the auto filter options be made to allow auto filter of TOR?


8ae01b  No.11903088

>>11902619

I don’t know about auto-filtering Tor board-wide, because it’s still given a distinct ID in each thread (in the background; you can see the ID if you’re on the main page and hover over someone quoting a Tor post that isn’t also visible on that page, but that’s just a bug and not relevant). As for common IDs across threads, that sounds more like an “account” to me than an anonymous imageboard… You can’t filter by IP board-wide, in other words.


000000  No.11903262

>>11901240

>Hi, I'm being payed to dilute this thread.

>I spam pointless repeated comments about previous mods

Unless of course a genuine useful idiot that falls for the other asshole's dilute-bait.

>>11902619

>filter all Tor

>I've heard many cool boys on /pol/ claim Tor users are shills!

>Today, I'll be a cool boy!

How's that NSA owned VPN working for ya? The boys you mentioned are circumcised.

Do you see most shills using Tor? Neither do I. The vast majority of them use VPNs honeypots. Not saying Tor is much safer .


5375b2  No.11903264

File: 19e480d8194d7da⋯.jpg (253.21 KB, 943x720, 943:720, 19e480d8194d7dad0f0bbf50ca….jpg)

Bring back Imkikefy


654a50  No.11903406

>>11903262

I see the majority of them use TOR.

The white-meet up guy ended up using TOR.

The I need a girlfriend guy ended up using TOR.

All of the black cock spammers end up using TOR.

etc

etc

etc

VPNs have less of an IP pool than TOR does and it's easy to run out of VPNs on them.

>>11903088

>account

Nothing I said can be taken as an account. I never said anything about registration.

Also why the fuck wouldn't you want board wide filters?


58af67  No.11903503

>>11898404

Cyclical sticky bump.


000000  No.11903522

>>11903406

>run out of VPNs

Is that really a thing?


8ae01b  No.11903593

>>11903406

>Also why the fuck wouldn't you want board wide filters?

Isn't that exactly what you were asking?

>if I filter someone in thread 902847, they will also be filtered in 902848.

It's an "account" that would be visible only to the people who have hidden the user, ironically.


000000  No.11904994

>>11903406

>I see the majority of them use TOR.

Riiiiiiiiight.

>it's easy to run out of VPNs

Wtf am I reading.


086754  No.11905471

>>11904994

Anyone knows why the Pedowood board was deleted?


b56f3c  No.11905574

>>11905471

Either it's owner deleted it or it was never brought back. if you have anything pedowood related, make a thread in /pdwd/


8ae01b  No.11905646

>>11903406

It’s not so much about Tor having an “IP pool” as it is that Codemonkey doesn’t want Tor banned in the first place. You can test this by creating your own temporary board and posting to it from a few different Tor nodes. Even though Tor tells you that you’re coming from different IPs (and you are), the 8chan mod software will show all Tor posts under the same IP hash on your board. So functions such as “delete all posts by IP” become useless and damaging to the board if a spammer goes haywire. We saw this happen once… Hell, when was it. Maybe three years ago now? Kikey deleted all Tor posts at once (either because of spam or because he just wanted to) and then banned Tor for an extended period. Probably because evil Nazis, white nationalists, and anti-Trumpers were using Tor to circumvent his /24 block bans and that hurt his feelings.

Couple Tor being seen by the board as a single IP with various employable tactics of using Tor and you wind up with pernicious spam.


654a50  No.11905800

>>11903593

Where did I say register?

Where did I say give login detail to website?

I said neither of those things. It's not an account you fucking kike.

Why are you so hell bent on allowing shills, spammers and shit posters to keep it up?


8ae01b  No.11906048

>>11905800

Why are you illiterate? Holy fuck.


140c2c  No.11906124

If this post was any older it would need a fucking wheelchair and oxygen tank. We all know Kikeys gone! Get rid of this shit!


040412  No.11906425

>>11906124

>unsticky a codemonkey sticky

I doubt any mods dare to do that.

>>11905646

pretty much this, you can only delete single tor posts. Heck, I know that the new mods banned tor at least twice, if only shortly.


dc596b  No.11906583

>>11895428

WHY IS THIS THREAD STILL IN TEH CATALOG?

>>11894504


dc596b  No.11906635

>>11906124

>We all know Kikeys gone!

He's not though, as has been demonstrated in this thread.

kikey is polvol2. He's still a mod.

Funny that your only commentary is crying that this thread exists.

>>11832429

>>11906124


040412  No.11906648

>>11906635

>polvol3 is kikey

>few weeks later it's polvol1

>then polvol2

Fuck it. Ron is actually kikey. I have proof I will never show, just trust me goy.


dc596b  No.11906653

>>11906648

polvol2 is kikey, your simp.

>>11906648

> I have proof I will never show, just trust me goy.

Actually the proof is readily available in this very thread.

>>11885957

>>11886028


040412  No.11906768

>>11906653

Your proof is someone taunting kikey in the meta thread and a mod using the same taunt when banning kikey.

I fail do see how that means the mod is kikey.


dc596b  No.11906907

>>11906768

>Your proof is someone taunting kikey in the meta thread

Ah, but now you're pretending that 'someone' hasn't been accusing fucktons of people of being kikey - namely, anyone critical of the new mods.

See:

>>11854219

... Which is really funny, because that post is linked in the post already linked to you. Its almost like you didn't read it at all.

>and a mod using the same taunt when banning kikey.

You mean when banning someone and accusing them of being kikey? Just like this Anon - who is pretty much the only person trying to force the meme, and hopping IPs to do it no less - has done in the thread?

Its almost like its kikey that is the mod-pretending-to-be-an-anon and accusing everyone critical of the new moderation of being kikey, much like - no, IDENTICALLY to what kikey used to do whenever people would criticize him.

>I fail do see how that means the mod is kikey.

Then you're not looking hard enough, because its pretty fucking blatant at this point lad.


040412  No.11907039

>>11906907

You fail at one crucial point: You do not prove that the mod did indeed ban someone for a random reason that was not "autistic kikey screeching".

In other words, you're building a castle out of sand and since I've never been banned for touchingwall.jpg or something like that since the mods are here, I'm inclined to doubt.

After all, you're implying CM either failed to notice kikey reapplying or intentionally left him in charge plus the fact that kikey is somehow capeable of toning it down, a thought I had a good giggle about, which are both highly unlikely.


040412  No.11907044

>>11907039

*a castle on sand


cf112d  No.11907057

>>11901358

>Thinks DOTR commandos wont gun down his swarthy brown Turkish ass

kek


2bc5ce  No.11907441

File: 047b10a0f0efd4b⋯.jpg (47.72 KB, 550x309, 550:309, Superior Irish White Genes.jpg)

>>11907057

Kampfy isnt Berkay.


2bc5ce  No.11908196

>>11908097

Ha, triggered the badjacketing shill.


1744ea  No.11908619

The constant shill posts and derails make this board only barely more usable than when coonfy was in charge


57eda0  No.11908960

File: 5d4063a065700f9⋯.png (36.88 KB, 500x712, 125:178, 1435698822873-0.png)

>>11903264

Never ever.


53873c  No.11909238

>>11622450

Your hands-off approach is awful.


4df1fd  No.11909742

>>11908619

Yes, he was a heretical fool, but in place of one heretical fool in power, we have a thousand spamming the board. Not an improvement. It's like being asked if you want one mudslime in charge of your town, or 50% of your town to be mudslimes.


4df1fd  No.11910169

>>11909992

Anon, you realize that one person won't be in every single thread at all hours, yes?


aeb872  No.11910245

Does anyone have that graph image of women with multiple sex partners vs. successful relationships? I'm a retard for not saving it all these years. I want to use it to redpill some people.


8ae01b  No.11910255

File: a27cc4f81f3343b⋯.jpg (1.62 MB, 4920x4161, 1640:1387, Chstity.jpg)

File: 64750069e09744c⋯.jpg (365.98 KB, 1223x1541, 1223:1541, Chastity.jpg)

>>11910245

You want the QTDDTOT thread for that, but yeah, I have it.


aeb872  No.11910330

File: bd7068386306540⋯.gif (303.81 KB, 402x414, 67:69, 9e7.gif)

>>11910255

Saved, and thanks. Although, the one I had in mind was a black and white image just like the second pic, top graph to the right. This will work perfectly though.


534c87  No.11910340

File: de92a03f1bc8605⋯.jpg (16.56 KB, 197x255, 197:255, crabs.jpg)

Boy, I sure do love having these Meta-Threads that go eternally nowhere being the only place to talk about how shills are shitting up the board.


534c87  No.11910359

Why did the mod's bump-lock my thread about Christian shilling on /pol/? They are fucking everywhere and need to be called out.


8ae01b  No.11910519

>>11910340

>i'd rather talk about shills than report them

Hmm.


1e54b3  No.11910846

>>11867070

Its sounds like you are lacking a real life


4df1fd  No.11910966

>>11892028

>>11892715

How do you not understand ban & delete-all, is the only solution to this spammer?


000000  No.11911035

To whoever is moderating for the past few days and today:

THANK YOU, from the bottom of my heart


a60c6e  No.11911072

blart, how mad are you that you lost your board?


8ae01b  No.11911713

>>11910966

A&E IS banned and deleted when it posts.


cf112d  No.11911844

>>11911072

Well, he is still here in this thread, so I would say

NOT MAD


000000  No.11911918

>>11910851

CuckState has been fucked. He hopes some other mod will lift the bumplock. Please don't. Let him die in piss. There is an easy way to distinguish his posts. I won't reveal it yet or he'll change tactics.

What's next my beloved mods:

-pseudoscience, magic, esoteric

When I first browsed /pol/ those type of threads (there were plenty) made me label /pol/acks as conspiracy crackpots. They are doing it intentionally. It has been an ongoing operation for a long time and this is exactly its goal: push away first-time visitors.

You want a "free-speech-oriented imageboard". Sure. We prove that electric universes are more retarded than a Mossad genius. We prove that flat-earth is more retarded than a JIDF genius that is, about 20 IQ or so. But we can't stop them from bumping. You must stop them.

If you don't want to anchor it because something of value might come out of it at least place a note at the top that would notify visitors of potential shilling:

>mod edit:

>pseudoscience posts are shill posts usually,

>but will leave this one open in case something useful comes out of it.

Or something like that. Something that wouldn't turn me away as it did in the past. This >>11807883 has been up since forever. They:

-started with flat-earth, got fucked

-changed to special relativity, got fucked

-changed to electric universe ....... etc.


2bc5ce  No.11911934

>>11911918

All that horseshit you describe goes on /x/


000000  No.11911967

Most visible parts of a post and why saging/debating in the top posts is essential.

Personally, I read the OP (only partially if too large), then check the first few replies. If I see a good argument saging I know that most likely OP is a shill. This means it's extremely important that shills are exposed as early as possible. If that fails, they will keep bumping the thread forever since few will read through 50 replies until they realize they are in a shill post.

This is why a few good sages early on make them abandon a shill-thread.


000000  No.11911991

>>11911934

>All that horseshit you describe goes on /x/

Why is >>11807883 still here then? Don't polvols know they should move it? I thought it stays here because they consider it tangentially relate to /pol/.


000000  No.11912026

Just look at this:

We are flat-earth, newfags!

>>11911719

>This is not an /x/ thread (OP)

They are doing it again and again. Just stop them already.

>>11911934

Can you come up with a suitable name for their operation?


dc596b  No.11912210

>>11907039

>You fail at one crucial point: You do not prove that the mod did indeed ban someone for a random reason that was not "autistic kikey screeching".

ANon, that has absolutely nothing to do with the argumentation/evidence at hand.

>In other words, you're building a castle out of sand

No, you're building a man out of straw to burn.

>and since I've never been banned for touchingwall.jpg or something like that since the mods are here, I'm inclined to doubt.

The evidence is there ANon, clear as day, all recorded - there's no absence of clarity here to hide behind, and the fact that the obtuse Zionist-friendly moderation is no longer being exercised means that and only that.

>After all, you're implying CM either failed to notice kikey reapplying or intentionally left him in charge

Yep.

>plus the fact that kikey is somehow capeable of toning it down, a thought I had a good giggle about, which are both highly unlikely.

He didn't tone anything down though, that's the point - he just changed his operational context. He's still doing basically the exact same sort of shit.

Explain:

>>11885957

>>11885543

>>11894880

>>11850255

I'll wait.


dc596b  No.11912251

On a side note, here's a question: Anyone else having issues with archiving the board log on archive.fo?

Seems to be having a lot of trouble with that page as of late.


2bc5ce  No.11912252

>>11911991

Chodenigger, thats why.


2bc5ce  No.11912258

Btw if youre unhappy about the state of the board just remember that Jim posts pictures of his pig farm with the exif data still on them.


dc596b  No.11912371

File: 9d71d0fbb601e89⋯.jpg (2.57 MB, 2620x4140, 131:207, nupol8.jpg)

File: bcd09227c111b4c⋯.jpg (3.68 MB, 2616x7752, 109:323, nupol8 2 electric jewballo….jpg)

File: c0b62f5f253f9e9⋯.png (46.27 KB, 258x330, 43:55, 02e6144a9d1f6be4ad84e08624….png)

>>11622450

>4. No duplicates - if several threads are made about the same subject, all but one of them will be deleted and redirected to the active thread.

So now you're ignoring you own rules to boot, eh?

What, the Jews shilling was just too important to interfere with?


506d36  No.11912393

>>11912371

The second pic is right tho, jews made up about 10% of the army, if I remember correctly. Are you a schizo?


dc596b  No.11912411

>>11912393

>(1)

HMMMMMM.


040412  No.11912468

>>11912210

You have evidence based on a pure assumption, which you just said that it doesn't matter.

>>11912371

It's bumplocked (and was locked by polvol2 kampfy, according to you) with a pretty decent ban message. So two mods agreed it's a shit thread and one took his time writing a message.

I think 506d36 is right, you're a schizo.


dc596b  No.11912479

File: 83b230835702670⋯.jpg (4.55 MB, 2616x9976, 327:1247, nupol8 electric jewballoo.jpg)

>>11912371

UPDATED


dc596b  No.11912489

>>11912468

>You have evidence based on a pure assumption

<deduction = assumption

Oh Jew.

>It's bumplocked

Why not deleted?

>with a pretty decent ban message

Hahaha, dude, SHUT THE FUCK UP with that trash.

"Oh, well, the jewish shills got a good talking to! That means something!" Fuck off dude.

>So two mods agreed it's a shit thread and one took his time writing a message.

Its in direct violation of the rules, they could have banned for a week and deleted the thread, but they didn't.

Funny that.


506d36  No.11912493

File: 7981b9eb270ef7b⋯.png (306.14 KB, 593x540, 593:540, 1445703242123.png)

>>11912411

Yup, schizo.


dc596b  No.11912500

File: f18524b4699678b⋯.png (229.1 KB, 500x486, 250:243, f18524b4699678b868a2a3d83d….png)

>>11912493

You know, its against the rules to evade a ban.


79fa93  No.11912521

>>11912493

yes he is see what he did in >>11910453

he has 30 replies in that thread


040412  No.11912543

>>11912489

Its in direct violation of the rules

Only because it's a duplicate, as the mod wrote he didn't even bad for the content itself because he can't and had to look for another reason.

>they could have banned for a week and deleted the thread, but they didn't.

Doubt it. They always start with 6 hour bans, so I'm fairly certain they're instructed to start low when there's no prior offenses, save for special cases like the pedo spammers we constantly see. Remember that they can see all posts across the board.

>>11912493

It's somewhat fun to bother him my ban-evading friend lol


040412  No.11912549

Oh, also

>bans

>meaning anything in the age of a gazillion VPNs

>meaning anything when you can reset your browser


506d36  No.11912551

>>11912521

I swear, it's either really mentally ill people who try to argue against facts, or actual leftykikes trying to cause division, confusion, and subversion. Sad, really.


cf112d  No.11912557

>>11912551

>defending a pro jew thread


040412  No.11912570

>>11912557

Just cause the guy you were against was a massive faggot doesn't mean you're not one either.


dc596b  No.11912576

>>11912543

>Its in direct violation of the rules

<Only because it's a duplicate

DING DING DING, we have a winner!

Thanks for playing nigger.

>they could have banned for a week and deleted the thread, but they didn't.

<Doubt it.

What's to doubt? They could have done it - they DO do it with some of these faggot spammers we've got in here now.

>Remember that they can see all posts across the board.

A shame they're no longer allowed to share that with us when its obviously someone deserving exposure.

>It's somewhat fun to bother him

Jews bother me, you're just kind of an autistic rubix cube to waste my time.

Thanks for thinking of me. I don't have anything for rent, but I don't need it, do I?

>>11912521

>(1)

I wonder if this is one of those kikes from that "Kikes for Hitler" thread… Hmmmmm.

>>11912551

This definitely is.

He did the same thing in the thread being cited, no less.

Remember: Form consensus. It gives the appearance of a united front.

Basic-bitch shilling, straight outta the book.


cf112d  No.11912587

>>11912570

>cant read IDs


506d36  No.11912596

File: 3858dc0ae676497⋯.jpg (27.84 KB, 513x510, 171:170, 83d.jpg)

>>11912557

Yup, just looked into the thread. You're a psycho or kike.

>>11912576

>This definitely is.

I'm talking about you, schlomo.


040412  No.11912603

>>11912587

Point applies to both of you

>>11912576

>thread still up

>people still posting in it, but no longer on the front page

Want them to make another? There's this thing called containment.


cf112d  No.11912613

>>11912596

>muh sluggish schizophrenia

Why are you saying "kike" if you like based jews?


dc596b  No.11912628

>>11912557

This board is basically done, because this 'muh free speech is most important!' has ensured this place will meet the same end as cuckchan.

The current discussion is entirely in that vein - this thread under discussion was in violation of the rules, point 1, but point 2, was in violation of board culture in the most blatant manner imaginable: multiple IPs, very clearly linked, orchestrating to promote embracing 'based jews'.

Is ANYONE fooled by this?

I fucking doubt it - but they'll still try! And if they get away with it, they'll push further, as kikes are want to do.

And pretty soon, you'll have "BBC is the best - that's my political opinion!" threads, with VERY verbose argumentation about how they should be allowed and its perfectly reasonable to accept such.

I rather doubt these faggots are even necessarily kikes - probably leftypol laughing at this prime division point which our fucktarded administrators have put in place and hammering away at it.

Which is extra funny in the context of faggots like this guy:

>>11912551

>or actual leftykikes trying to cause division, confusion, and subversion

He's literally defending what are unquestionably those aiming to cause division, confusion and subversion, there's no other purpose to making the threads in question, these "Jews for HItler" threads.

But he'll defend them, because he's kind of autistic, and "muh rules" are ever so important to him - or rather, pretending he's somehow 'enlightened' by the fact that he sees the rules, and autistically feels

>>11912549

>bans mean nothing goyim

Then why were people so upset about them in the past? Isn't range-banning IPs the reason kikey got removed from power?

If they have no impact, that doesn't follow really, and it doesn't follow, because they have impact, because IPs aren't unlimited - and every one you take away is a route that people can't use to come and shitpost, or to post regularly… And that's the real struggle: Shills will burn out as many IPs as they can, and so it becomes an issue of maintaining a balance… But there doesn't seem to be any such efforts at this point, its just a free-for-all… And if you don't like it, or attempt to present evidence of the harm it represents - and the wrong-doing on behalf of those engaging in it - you have shills come outta the woodwork to kvetch and moan.

See:

>>11912596

>>11912603

>Want them to make another?

>There's this thing called containment.

It doesn't work, as evidenced here, wherein they bumplocked the thread so the kike came back and made another one the next day, and the mods bumplocked that one and gave him a 6 hour ban.

Same time tomorrow?


dc596b  No.11912642

>>11912628

woops

>and autistically feels motivated to defend them and attack those who oppose such.


040412  No.11912691

>>11912628

>It doesn't work, as evidenced here, wherein they bumplocked the thread so the kike came back and made another one the next day, and the mods bumplocked that one and gave him a 6 hour ban.

>

>Same time tomorrow?

Better than right now and in 15min and in 30min and so on.

As I said, bans don't do shit.


dc596b  No.11912709

>>11912642

>>11912628

Oh, shit, I got mixed up!

I thought the faggot I was talking about with the division/subversion/confusion thing was this other faggot here

>>11912549

My bad.

This guy

>>11912551

Came in the thread like 10 minutes ago, after I started complaining about his kike buddies.

See:

>>11912393

>>11912493

>>11912551

>>11912596

Jews made up 10% of the Germany army, eh?

Hmmm, seems dubious. Of course, we also had another kike in that thread about "Kikes for Hitler" yammering on about how kikes were totally BASED and Hitler let a bunch of them into his forces…

… Of course, when I pointed out that a bunch of literally-African-niggers died in Berlin as well, hmmm, he suddenly didn't have much to say.

Weird, I know.

Let's see, who else showed up since I started mentioning this thread…

>>11912521

But yeah, no, there's no shilling going on here.

>>11912691

>Better than right now and in 15min and in 30min and so on.

Not in any meaningful sense, no - in fact, that'd be better, because it'd be more feasible to "justifiably" ban them for longer via the current shit-tier ruleset.

With this methodology, the one you're defending, they can just come in every day and make one of these threads. Hell, they can make several, and as long as they don't violate the rules, they can stay up. Of course, then we get into how the mods define spam and HOLY SHIT THIS IS SUCH A FUCKING TRAINWRECK.

>As I said, bans don't do shit.

They do though, because, as I said, you removed the last moderation staff because of the fact that bans DO do quite a lot of shit.

You have no counter-argument to that effect.


506d36  No.11912712

>>11912628

>He's literally defending what are unquestionably those aiming to cause division, confusion and subversion, there's no other purpose to making the threads in question, these "Jews for HItler" threads.

I get that, but he does have good points in that some jews DID join Germany. Was that anon wrong? When the anon said that, the schizo only replied with "muh hitler lost" which is prime a prime kike response and a non argument at that.


cf112d  No.11912720

>>11912712

Why do you want to exactly copy a man and movement which lost? Hitler was a good leader, and NS was a good system, but to pretend that they didn't have faults/make mistakes, then you are mistaken.


cf112d  No.11912725

And if he would have seen what the

BASED JEWS

had planned for the white world, I highly doubthe would have let them serve in the Wehrmacht.


dc596b  No.11912745

>>11912712

>I get that, but he does have good points

No, he doesn't.

>in that some jews DID join Germany.

>Was that anon wrong?

YES!

And I'll explain!

Is it factual that Jews - mostly mischlings, really - were in the Germany army?

YES.

Does that suggest they were decent or in any way doing something noble.

NO. Why? Because they were doing it to serve themselves - that's all that matters.

How could you possibly argue that Jews believed in National Socialism, or, if they did, that such isn't representative of SEVERE self-hatred, which is, itself, expressly contrary to NatSoc ideology, which suggests that people should LOVE THEIR PEOPLE?

It doesn't make any sense - unless you assume the kikes in question weren't doing it because they gave a shit about 'the cause', but because they were hoping to benefit from it personally, say, by NOT being excised from Germany?

Maybe they hoped they'd get to be some of the 'good Jews' who remained to subvert another day, so to speak.

In any case, a buncha niggers from literally Africa died in Berlin at the end - were they also 'BASED' like these kikes? Or were they just niggers doing something that seemed to serve their nigger interests at the time?

Its not hard to figure out.

Point being: The faggot you're defending? He's not doing it because he believes in the righteousness of these kikes, he's doing it to be subversive, to either create - as you put it - division, confusion and subversion, or he's just trying to subvert, to get a foot in the door for kikes and thus create the baseline required to get /pol/ to accept the sickly notion of there being 'good Jews'.

>When the anon said that, the schizo

You mean me, you fucking newfag kike shill faggot?

>only replied with "muh hitler lost" which is prime a prime kike response and a non argument at that.

Its a kike response to say "But Hitler lost" when someone is arguing that kikes are awesome and totally served under Hitler? No, you newfaggot, the 'prime kike response' is to hold up the miniscule number of kikes who served in the German army and to pretend they were doing so because they believed in the cause and were in any way noble or virtuous - the Aryan response is to point out that Hitler lost that conflict in the end, so his compassion probably wasn't well placed, AND THOSE KIKES CERTAINLY DIDN'T HELP GERMANY POST WAR, DID THEY? No, they didn't, they benefitted from what their kike brothers did just like all the other kikes, while the Germans ate shit.

And you want me to believe Hitler would still have been as open as he was - meager though such openness was - to kikes today, after seeing what happened to Germany, and how kikes the world over have responded?

Get real, kike.


dc596b  No.11912776

>>11912725

>>11912720

It also bears mentioning that just because negative-actions on behalf of these kikes weren't exposed or recorded does not suggest such was not transpiring.

I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that many of the kikes in the Wehrmacht, pitifully small though their number may have been, did their best to fuck things up when the opportunity arose.


dc596b  No.11912873

>>11912776

ALSO, while I'm here, what happened to the "no advertisement" rule?

I could have sworn that was still a thing.

The reason I bring it up is because BOTH OF THE "BASED KIKES" THREADS IN QUESTION AMOUNTED TO ADVERTS.

In both cases, the OP was trying to shill a Jewish Jewtubers as a great source of redpills on Jewry and the holohoax… But more than that, was suggesting this was the BEST material for such efforts… Anyone else think its a bit strange to suggest that a kike is the best source for redpilling on kikes and the holohoax?

Seems a bit… Irrational. Nonsensical. Prone to permittance of subversion.

Its not like there isn't a plethora of media on this subject: Jewtube is rife with decent material which is NOT created by a kike… And if you genuinely believed this kike WAS the best content, why don't you just copy it yourself and have an Aryan-derived content exhibit to provide to /pol/?

Why would you come here and try to shill for a Jew?

Why would you argue this Jew is the best content there is?

None of this makes sense - nor does it make sense for the mods to have seen it sitting there and not done anything about it.

I mean, fuck, how about THAT becomes a rule!

I thusly propose a new rule:

Rule 5

No shilling for Jews. No promotion of Jews as 'good' or 'acceptable in the movement'. No advertising their content.

The reasoning: /pol/ espouses a board culture, and while freedom of speech is important, so is maintaining that culture within certain bounds, specifically in the vein of keeping out Jewish subversives whose efforts would be geared towards creating a beachhead for Jewish infiltrators aiming to subvert the movements which are most-commonly promoted on /pol/.

There.

Does ANYONE actually disagree with that, and if they do, I would suggest moderators take a look at their posting history and ask themselves whether or not this seems to be a genuine /pol/ack.

I look forward to hearing response from the community in this capacity - this is the meta thread, after all.


6e2ab3  No.11912890

>>11912873

Just shut the fuck up negro


b56f3c  No.11912893

>>11911918

>shilling against electric universe

yeah nah, get fucked


dc596b  No.11912902

>>11912890

>(1)

No kike.


6e2ab3  No.11912908

>>11912902

Castrated


dc596b  No.11912911

>>11912908

New IP, huh?

Neato sport.

Rule 5


6e2ab3  No.11912918

>>11912911

You sure are retarded


dc596b  No.11912919

>>11912918

You sure are scared of

Rule 5

it seems.


6e2ab3  No.11912938

>>11912919

wtf is rule 5 negro?


dc596b  No.11912950

>>11912938

Jesus Christ, really? This is what you amount to these days, kampfy?

Rule 5

was described in the post to which you just responded - I know, it was multiple paragraphs and that's usually outside your capacity for reading comprehension, but you could at least try not to come off as an awful subversive.


cf112d  No.11912955

>>11912908

>>11912938

Something that would stop your

BASED KIKE

shilling


dc596b  No.11912973

>>11912955

Checked for great truth and incredibly apprpropriate dubs.

Rule 5

Rule 5

No shilling for Jews. No promotion of Jews as 'good' or 'acceptable in the movement'. No advertising their content.

The reasoning: /pol/ espouses a board culture, and while freedom of speech is important, so is maintaining that culture within certain bounds, specifically in the vein of keeping out Jewish subversives whose efforts would be geared towards creating a beachhead for Jewish infiltrators aiming to subvert the movements which are most-commonly promoted on /pol/.

If anyone has some reasoning via which this might be opposed, I'd love to hear it.


f00d3f  No.11913140

Why was the UFO thread bumplocked? Keeping an eye on what is being pushed in mainstream news sites is aboslutely /pol/ related.


2bc5ce  No.11913669

>chodenigger floods the thread to hide that it was pointed out his dads location is available in his pig farm photos


ced469  No.11913713

>>11912950

>>11912955

>>11912973

kek what a bunch of bozos


040412  No.11913815

>>11913669

I'd take a pigfucker over you any day coonfy. Also literally no one gives a fuck about where the guy lives.


8ae01b  No.11913877

>>11913140

You can keep an eye on it in /x/, can’t you? /pol/ is a board of truth. Until such time as there’s even so much as reasonable fucking doubt that we’re not alone in our solar system, there’s no reason to waste our time with meaningless jewish bullshit such as the well poisoning that is aliens (and the attendant claims–reptilians, etc.)


8ae01b  No.11913941

>>11912873

I rather think that your rule 5 goes without saying, doesn’t it? That’s what /pol/ IS. Advertising, of course, counts as spam. We see that TRS fag post here every once in a while. You can spot him a mile away; his language is very precise. Always telling people “this is a subscriber video”, such and such. That’s obviously not allowed here and we don’t have any love for controlled opposition anyway.

>>11911918

I like your post and agree with basically everything you’ve said. I would guess that your reference to >>11807883 has been left up solely because jews HAVE completely fucked the sciences. Climatology has been controlled by jews since the late 1970s, and has done nothing but push the hoax of global warming since then. Once the next grand solar minimum starts (because nothing else short of killing all jews will expose their lies), it will take DECADES for the general public to TRUST real climatologists again. The same goes for psychology, which hasn’t been a science since 1970 and has been 100% jewish filtered since 1900. Psychology has not been seen except through the jewish lens since Freud. All other research has been shut down and destroyed. And that’s just two fields. The title of the thread is perfectly legit to discuss, so if spammers try to take it the fuck out of let field then I’d of course report.


f00d3f  No.11913975

>>11913877

>until such time as there's even so much as reasonable fucking doubt about aliens

You're not getting it. The odds that its ayys is pretty fucking low, I'm not saying there's ayys, I'm saying that for mainstream news sources to start hinting that there's shit like ayys there's something big going on. This isn't like its some fringe site, if it was I wouldn't be bothering bringing it up on /pol/, its the largest media sites in the country.


f00d3f  No.11913988

>>11913877

Also

>You can keep an eye on it in /x/ can't you?

No, I quite obviously cannot because instead of looking at the political machinations that are happening behind the scenes for stories like this to be airing /x/ is going to be talking about stupid bullshit like reptilians.


b56f3c  No.11915569

>>11915452

you left these out of your post


000000  No.11915843

>>11913941

>left up because of Climatology and psychology

Those aren't even mentioned in that thread, so this isn't the case. That thread contains electric universes and flat-earthers. It's constantly bumped by shills. It must be deleted. If someone wants to discuss climatology create a new thread and leave out retarded theories. Oh wait, how can they push newfags out then :/

>>11912893

>I got fucked

I know CuckState. Get used to it.

You are a good person and extremely intelligent and hardworking!!!1! You have dedicated your life to protect this world. NatSoc has caused so much harm in the past and you want to save mankind from WW3. You can do it! All you need to do is destroy /pol/.

You have the skills, you have the dedication it takes. It won't be a utopia after /pol/ is gone but anything would be better than another shoah. The people that help you, are like-minded individuals. They strive for the survival of mankind. They saw your potential and helped you thrive! sucker

**……..I'm joking. You are not sufficiently intelligent otherwise you wouldn't get bumplocked so many times. You are a megalomaniac that has miserably failed in life. Trying to destroy /pol/ gives you meaning again. Keeps your grandiosity alive. Allows you to continue daydream of being a hero, a savior of mankind!

NatSoc isn't the cause of WW1-2. NatSoc was a symptom of your (((friends)))' greed and stupid utopian ideas. Their new plans of lowering world mean IQ by 0.5 to 1 standard deviation will be catastrophic and will 100% trigger WW3. Nevermind that, the master race will stop it with an iron fist, right? Stop 20+ nuclear powers! Riiiiiiiight.

In reality you have failed in everything you wanted. All you have now is /pol/. Your "friends" know you are a megalomaniac, they feed you and you love them. They are using you. See how useless you are? Just a tool for more intelligent shills.**


8ae01b  No.11915861

>>11915843

>Those aren't even mentioned in that thread

Didn't say they were, just that they're valid topics for the thread.


e020f0  No.11916533

>>11912873

It is astounding that you mods leave this schizophrenic newfag run amok while bumplocking my threads and banning me because of "bait" - very nuanced view of you when a half-Jew is for Hitler and actively exposing the Jews and their henchmen. I don't expect of you to do the job properly, because you don't do yours in the first place.


000000  No.11916711

>>11916533

Which thread are you referring to? Mistakes can happen. Mods are humans too…


2bc5ce  No.11916932

File: 226d53de3357a4a⋯.mp4 (7.1 MB, 640x360, 16:9, gas-gas-gas mp4.mp4)

>>11916533

>Im a Jew but I absolutely must be allowed on National Socialist forums, this is the only place I will post and its unacceptable if you dont accept me and let me tell you how to think.

Yea, thats a kike alright. Shut the fuck up and lurk if you care.


2bc5ce  No.11916935

>>11913815

Sounds like chodenigger is scared some pro-whites might show up on the farm to tell Jim why its not okay to promote white genocide by undermining pro-white radicals.


8ae01b  No.11917150

>>11916935

>I had my internet power fantasy stolen from me so I’m trying to get actual hitmen to go kill the people responsible

Imkikey, ladies and gents.


000000  No.11917156

>>11622450

Oh look another religious D&C slide

>>11917034

>We shouldn't D&C about religion guys:)

>(OK lets do this start shilling!)

Everyday a new religious D&C pops up.

(small) bonus operation:

>leave newfags, /pol/ is shit.


2bc5ce  No.11917297

File: 3d17f1d788186ae⋯.jpg (89.98 KB, 683x626, 683:626, armored-laugh.jpg)

>>11917150

Thats a pretty big jump there bud, I just said talk to him. Its obvious youre the invader and the problem that everyone is upset about with the current state of the board.

Since you mentioned assassinations though, have you seen this thread yet?

https://8ch.net/pol/res/11908104.html

Funny stuff.


8ae01b  No.11917360

>>11917297

>it’s a jump to say the exact same thing I already admitted

Wow.


2bc5ce  No.11917422

File: 05abe5940a07638⋯.png (855.33 KB, 664x481, 664:481, Much-Big-Jew-Problem.PNG)


edaf24  No.11919415

File: 0485b4de7280d09⋯.png (185.13 KB, 924x789, 308:263, wtf cursed child.PNG)

Not worth making a thread about, but

W T F


000000  No.11919486

>>11919415

Why are you looking at this autistic garbage?


8713a9  No.11919508

>>11622450

Now I have enought of this. Interesting threads like this >>11915590 are promptly anchored, but esotheric BS like that >>11918196 are still on. Wtf?


edaf24  No.11919683

>>11919486

Nostalgia?

Also insomnia.


000000  No.11919784

Anyone else think the default view is too small to read? I have to zoom a bunch of times, and it still fucks my eyes after a while.


edaf24  No.11919830

>>11919784

Yes, for 99% of websites. That's why I use a plugin that will zoom automatically a preset amount everywhere. Try it.


000000  No.11920464

Could we have this somewhere on the board at all times to cut down the Chinese Internet Defense Force?

1989年天安门广场大屠杀

1989年天安門廣場大屠殺


000000  No.11921583

>>11622450

JIDF (Mossad) operations on /pol/

Here are a few religious oriented operations of JIDF on /pol/. Their goals are pushing away newfags, D&C and sliding. Note that although some of these threads can be posted by legitimate users they are abused to their fullest extend by the JIDF.

For now I've only picked those related to religion, magic, """esoterics""", pseudoscience:

>>11919839

>To achieve salvation, one needs to get in touch with secret knowledge

>>11765019

>Druid/pol/ #0021 Midsummer

Probably created and mostly used by /pol/acks; abused to some extend by JIDF.

>>11915807

>Secret societies within Judaism and Islam

>>11920468

>ESOTERIC FALSE FLAGS

(small chance of legitimate post)

>>11903065

>Stop Worshipping Satanic Celebrities

>What is "taking him over?" If not all, most celebrities sell their souls.

<newfag: Let me check this site...... ok /pol/ is retarded, I'm out

>>11909741

>END OF DAYS? Mystery as sky turns black in the middle of DAY in remote Russian towns with locals blaming secret weapons test, aliens or the DEVIL

The devil? Ffs JIDF trash.

>>11917034

>religion /=/ politics

>There are good and bad religious /pol/acks

Bait:

>the bad one do this and that and the other

disguising shilling:

>disregard our religious differences and unite in our common ethnic and political interests

<he can't possibly be setting up a religious D&C if he says we should unite!

Yeah? Just look at the responses.

>>11918859 (anchored)

>Hi, former atheist here.

OP sets it up. Standard D&C shilling ensues >>11918989

>>11807883

>Jewish Technology

>Jews contribute in science, they are overrepresented

>meaning special relativity is a lie, flat earth is right

<newfag: retards, I'm out of /pol/

>>11912208

>the enemy has developed methods of implanting their voices into your skull

Why is this still up?

>>11909966 (anchored)

>Cristian Shilling on /pol/

>I've seen a lot of threads and posters on /pol/ shitting on paganism and vehemently defending Christianity

<So christians attack pagans on /pol/, let's fight them.

D&C.

>>11910851 (anchored)

>(((esoterics))) of White Genocide

This has been up for months. Thank you for destroying him. Here is some of his screeching >>11910984

>>11910808 (anchored)

>Degeneracy and Athiesm

>Athiests get in here

Another attempt to D&C

>>11803280

>PAGANISM IS NOT INDO-EUROPEAN

>>11897308 (anchored)

>The Odinist Lady is Stuck in Hawaii

>>11787491

>posted a thread about the "g" in the freemason symbol. I was gonna respond with this, but the thread got locked

Poor shill, his shilling got locked and he created a new one.

>>11457814 (anchored)

>The (((esoterics))) of White Genocide

Yes, there were multiple threads about it. CuckState suck a dick again!

I am not saying that all the threads above are shilling (most are though). What I want you to see is the patterns. I will not be explicit on how to identify them but in general:

spiritual threads or pseudoscience -> repel newfags + D&C + slide

Off topic:

>>11903029

>call these numbers, t.CIA

Who unlocked this and why?


a2042c  No.11921745

Jewess destroys woman's life for being (((anti-semitic)))

>>>https://gizmodo.com/when-a-stranger-decides-to-destroy-your-life-1827546385


000000  No.11922216

>>11921745

of course. who is a greater enemy to women than the jew? just look at the all the jewish (((feminists))).


8ae01b  No.11922435

>>11921583

>secret societies within judaism and islam

>stop worshipping satanic celebrities

I agree with you except for these. Useful information can come from them.

>>11920464

It’s a neat idea, but where would it go? Oh! Maybe it could go as a comment in the CSS file. It wouldn’t show up for anyone, but it would still be downloaded by everyone’s computer (and therefore read as text by the commie Chinese filter). I wonder if it would be flagged from just that, or if the chinks actually have to type those words themselves.


686e6a  No.11922516

Hey that thread about what went wrong was pretty interesting

could have just deleted pictures instead of the whole thread


000000  No.11923158

>>11921583

>Who unlocked this and why?

Was it ever locked? Board log doesn't show either a lock or an unlock.


2bc5ce  No.11923227

File: aa659b88a3d6d3a⋯.jpg (19.37 KB, 400x300, 4:3, tumor.jpg)

Why the fuck did you just delete the thread I just made? It was written by someone on Billy Ropers Shieldwall network and is the most relevant fucking thing to /pol/ on the board, its about racewar. What the fuck is wrong with you?


2bc5ce  No.11923245

Give me an explanation or Im going to remake it. He worked with William Luther Pierce and that is a serious network that opposes white genocide and stands for balkanization of America. If you dont have an excuse besides that youre some /v/ global who has fuck all to know about white nationalism then kill yourself.


040412  No.11923293

>>11923227

>>11923245

I think you've got the wrong door, cuckchan is two blocks down


2bc5ce  No.11923298

>>11923293

See, this is a shill.


040412  No.11923327

File: af23e2736e8a8e6⋯.jpg (152.87 KB, 807x1192, 807:1192, Serenity 1 cover.jpg)

>>11923298

You seem mad friend. I didn't actually see your thread but seeing your posts here I can guess what kind of shit thread you made.


2bc5ce  No.11923335

>>11923327

Youre the one who doesnt know who Billy Roper is and isnt already pissed off that an article about racewar written on the shieldwall network would be deleted.


2bc5ce  No.11923337

File: 8aa6db717c7331f⋯.jpg (256.09 KB, 1543x623, 1543:623, billy-roper-thread.JPG)


040412  No.11923366

File: 829083cc8fe5686⋯.png (732.12 KB, 878x1200, 439:600, f042bc06b0d5c2201accffe70d….png)

>>11923335

Not a burger so I don't gave a flat fuck about some faggot who wrote a thing

>>11923337

>copypasted article

>muh racewar

>zero relation to anything happening

>not even a fucking comment except whining about mods

Yeah I can see why they deleted that. Hope they do it again faggot


2bc5ce  No.11923760

>>11923366

Thats why we banned you before. You contribute nothing and are really an obvious anti-white who doesnt care at all about white genocide. People post articles all the time from cucked mainstream sources, I dont need to justify posting something that epitomizes /pol/ itself. KYS kike.


040412  No.11923792

>>11923760

>we

You mean you, gelded one


cf112d  No.11923805

>>11923337

Remake the thread m8


2bc5ce  No.11923810

>>11923792

No, I mean we, it was a team effort and we all rejected you upon sight. You dont care about white genocide and sow anti-white D&C, you get banned.

>>11923805

I remade it after the mods refused to answer me, as it turns out theres a thread exactly like it and I understand why it was deleted although it obviously should have been locked and a note put up instead pointing out theres another similar thread. I reposted the article in the one about civil war in America, although it wasnt exactly 100% the same subject.. the titles looked nearly identical.


cf112d  No.11923818

>>11923808

100101 10001001 1001 11110


040412  No.11923825

>>11923810

We as in you and your reddit buttbuddy?

I'll gladly fight hordes of niggers with burgers, but europeans don't call themselves white, just like burgers don't call themselves "world citizens"


2bc5ce  No.11923847

>>11923825

It was a great time when you knew if someone mocked white genocide opposition, or Pierce and actual resistance to Jewry that they might not only get banned, but rangebanned too. You are a blight on humanity and it will be so much more fun seeing you removed from participation for good.


040412  No.11923869

>>11923847

We know you liked your poweres. And I never said I mock white genocide, I call your notion of "white" in the context of nonburgers retarded.

Yes, you banned me for that. Funny how it's not happening now.


2bc5ce  No.11923877

>>11923869

Typical anti-white D&C, Im not kampfy but he banned all the TRS cancer like you that I reported, and that everyone else reported. Youre just an anti-white troll, you exist to stifle opposition to white genocide with shill tactics. You should be banned even under the current rules, youve literally contributed nothing except false accusations for 30 posts.


040412  No.11923889

>>11923877

>I'm a turk, I decide what your racial identity must be


888dc0  No.11924166

>>11924083

How about no, tor poster.


888dc0  No.11924174

>>11824535

>everyone in charge of everything is a CIA operative

This is a CIA tactic in itself. They're just autistic.


000000  No.11924980

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

Potential Chimpout in Toledo

https://www.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2050977728270178&id=100000739136276&_rdr

http://m.wtol.com/toledonewsnow/db/347256/content/uv9zimKr

http://www.13abc.com/content/news/Toledo-Police-Officer-involved-shooting-No-officers-injured-489377721.html

Can someone grab this video? I'd like to see the extra hole Toledo PD put in his fucking face

https://archive.is/ushO9


eb295c  No.11925881

>>11924980

Fascinating to see them work themselves up into a troop frenzy. Nice to see little kids and infants in the crowd.


0bbde5  No.11928536

>>11924174

Jim Watkins is definitely a spook.


122210  No.11928546

I have but one request

Stop letting these skeevy kikes slide pedowood threads. We got them by the balls now, we're clearly over the target.


0bbde5  No.11928551

>>11923337

Bill Roper is a CIA agent, as is his long time friend and photojournalist (classic CIA cover job) David Holloway.

Every WN personality associated with Stormfront is a CIA agent.


297e9a  No.11929364

>>11928551

>Remember goys it's never the Jews behind anything

still trying huh?


297e9a  No.11929368

>>11924174

no, he's trying to spread FUD while avoiding anti-semitic slurs.


2bc5ce  No.11930018

>>11892759

>What do we do with the non-white population?

<Let's deport them

>Sounds reasonable

<No wait, let's kill them all race war now 14/88

Look, this is very simple. They arent going to allow themselves to be deported so most of them will die in the racewar, violently resisting us. They wont go peacefully, there is no voting solution, the government and system will never allow us to do what we desire peacefully. Most non-whites can be deported, after the racewar. Jews will not be among them. We dont need to see niggers dead, but Jews cannot be left to get away. If however it comes to cleaning our continents without deportations, we will be prepared for that. Most people advocating kill em all are larpers.


2bc5ce  No.11930025

>>11892759

Btw itd be nice if you actually demonstrated the chart with the European cluster, and make sure it includes Portugal, who are like 30% Moorish. When you have a tradition of reproducing with your slaves, you dun goofd.


122210  No.11930652

Please pin one of those pedo hunt threads.


122210  No.11930655

>>11930018

>We dont need to see niggers dead

cuck


8ae01b  No.11930701

>>11930655

Short term vs. long term, anon.


122210  No.11931653

I repeat; keep one of the pedo threads pinned.

sliding is in mass effect.


200bf8  No.11931839

Why is that only boomers hate pedos? Why do they only hate white male hetero pedos? Why is Drumpf orange? Why anglos/jews are so evil? Why do americans think they can be redeemed for their crimes agaisnt the white race and civilization in general?


5caffe  No.11932197

>>11929364

>>Remember goys it's never the Jews behind anything

The CIA and Pentagon are heavily Jewish at the top.


791cde  No.11932299

>>11932197

It's always all or nothing with you retards. Have you ever considered that maybe it's the Jews in addition to other groups?


8ae01b  No.11932618

>>11932299

Put a bullet in your brain. You think we’ll fall for your false dichotomy? It is always the jews. Period. It is also ALL OF the jews. There are no good ones and none can escape their fate. It is ALSO SOME of the other groups. If this is confusing to you, you’re either a paid shill or under 12.


2f2011  No.11936219

I saw the board was at 500pph and thought some big happening was going on, turns out it's just a cuckchan invasion.

What a letdown.


8ae01b  No.11936423

>>11936219

I’m just bothered by the fact that the only thing keeping the board at pre-kikey levels during kikey was kikey’s literal paid shills and alternate IP personas.


d2b83c  No.11937185

Why the fuck was this thread >>11936925

on Paul Nehlen's LIVE announcement of the FEC Twitter Complaint locked?

This has massive implications for the movement and Freedom of Speech on the internet in general!

There are NOT '12 existing Paul Nehlen threads' as the mod seemed to imply.

Searching for 'Nehlen' in the catalog gives 0 other results!

Mods confirmed for CivNat faggots once again!


72cf1d  No.11937228

File: dcedb2a887bcdac⋯.png (278.26 KB, 745x697, 745:697, Screenshot 2018-07-30 at 2….png)

My thread on the "attraction to minors & survival" was not in violation of any of the current rules as stated here: >>11622450

You banned it anyway with the comment "apologizing for pedophilia" which my thread wasn't even about. It was discussing if there is a biological reason for men to be attracted to minors and also discussing the long history of child marriage & sex throughout the ages that is being hidden from the masses.

Your own rules state:

1.8chan is a free-speech-oriented imageboard.

2.Do not ban people for having an opinion, even if you believe it's the wrong one;

Admin/mods explain your reasoning for my 3-day ban!


b2496b  No.11937240

>>11937228

Here's a rule. Take your pilpul somewhere else pedophile.


72cf1d  No.11937252

>>11937240

Having a discussion/debate about a controversial topic doesn't make one a pedophile idiot.


628455  No.11937266

>>11937252

Get niggerfucked whoreson


f13967  No.11937393

>>11937252

We already discussed it and decided jewbrain fucktards with the hots for little girls get banned. Also ban-evading wetbacks get the hook, so this ID is next, dipshit.


72cf1d  No.11937450

File: 0dbda872addb3d5⋯.jpeg (146.46 KB, 912x1346, 456:673, age of consent truth.jpeg)

>>11937393

Nearly everyone's ancestors were pedophiles dumbass. Pedophilia is most likely genetic but the truth of that is being suppressed. The attraction to minors is apparently normal if you look at the cold hard truth.

Prior to the 1900's the age of consent in most of the USA was 10-years-old (younger than most of the rest of the world). The State of Delaware had the lowest age of consent at 7-years-old.

Source:

https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/09/age-of-consent-in-european-american-history/

https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/09/13/the-age-of-consent-laws-in-america-1800s/

You don't want truth & honesty on here. You want everyone to have a witchhunt against pedophiles and anyone you don't agree with who bases everything they say on factual sources because you're a stupid fucking coward.


f13967  No.11937611

File: 82dcd8b31110bdd⋯.jpeg (41.83 KB, 600x756, 50:63, aids.jpeg)

>>11937450

And yet here I am, with an adult wife in a functional marriage, and here you are, a disgusting perverted freak who wants to touch children because adult women can't be groomed, and don't want to touch the circumcised microween of a gross, hooknose lardball. Weird.


a79516  No.11937634

>>11937611

A functional marriage isn't functional without children. I hope your wife saved some eggs and you froze your sperm. You'll both be useless as breeders in a few years if not already and your marriage will fall apart as childless marriages always do.


8ae01b  No.11937670

>>11937185

4. No duplicates - if several threads are made about the same subject, all but one of them will be deleted and redirected to the active thread.


8ae01b  No.11937684

>>11937634

Isn’t it great how you know fucking nothing about him and that you’ve created a strawman to burn to make yourself feel superior?

>>11937450

Look at all that utter bullshit. Why should we support you talking about fucking kids, moishe?


a79516  No.11937901

>>11937684

Once again you refuse to see the truth in my posts.

No one is talking about raping/abusing kids or having sex with them.

What I'm saying is pedophilia has always been legal until the 1900s when Jews took over the USA and decided to control over everything (including the age of consent) and hide the fact of what they were doing behind-the-scenes. They're doing that today trying to make people feel ashamed for something that is completely normal while watching your rates of birth decline.


a79516  No.11937907

Jews always play and try to manipulate all sides until everyone is under their control.

Divide and conquer has always been how they play.


669ea5  No.11938225

>threads are being necrobumped

>a huge slew of low effort question threads are being made

They're afraid.


8ae01b  No.11938257

>>11937901

>What I’m saying is pedophilia has always been legal

And that’s not relevant.

>They’re doing that today trying to make people feel ashamed for something that is completely normal

There is nothing normal about raping children. Kill yourself.


141a8c  No.11938448

>>11938257

Marrying a young girl to be your wife, take care of, love, and to bear your children til' death do you part..isn't rape. It's love!

It's only wrong if the husband uses his age/power to abuse/manipulate/control/rape her.

This is how it always has been done for thousands of years. Even today a young girl (12-16) can be married off to an older guy with her parents permission and a judges approval in many states in America regardless of what that states age of consent is. Many religious groups do this but you won't hear it about it in the news.

Article about a 13yo being allowed to marry in New Hampshire:

https://discover-the-truth.com/2017/03/12/13-year-old-girls-permitted-to-marry-by-law-in-new-hampshire-america-2017/


8ae01b  No.11938485

>>11938448

Your shit is still irrelevant to us. The reason you can’t date and marry a 14-16 year old and you could 100 years ago is the pill and the sexual revolution. Before the sexual revolution, here’s how it went: Man reached financial security and is ready to marry. He falls in love with neighbor girl who is 14-16 and starts to court her. The parents think he is a fine fit and let it happen. Since sex has consequences (pregnancy => marriage), there was no element of exploitation involved. The man basically openly signaled that he was willing to feed their daughter until he dies and pay/care for her children emotionally and financially. He marries her, the whole community/villages knows, and everything is fine. The only ones pushing for higher consent and marriage age are feminists who are bitter about being childless, husband-less, suffragettes in their 30s and want to compress the marriage market.

Now enter the ‘60s: Sexuality has no consequences anymore. Marriage is devalued. Liberals and hippies already push the boundaries because, “Hey, sex is for fun; why shouldn’t everyone do it?” The majority of society is still in the old mindset, though. Liberals and degenerates start to have sex with children (grooming) just for fun without planing to marry/have children with the girls. They rob the girls of their innocence and trust in relationships, then drop her for a younger girl. Here we see the rise of the concept of child exploitation. In the ‘60s and ‘70s, you had a lot of liberals and artists pushing pedophilia in arts and film since the majority of people still were behind the curve. (A lot of ‘70s movies with casual pedophilia)

‘70s: Pedophilia and drug use are rampant. The family unit is destroyed and young girls turned into nihilist whores because their belief in romantic relationships has been destroyed by liberals who are just out for young flesh without responsibility.

‘80s: By now relationships with young girls has become synonymous with exploitation of young girls since marriage and sex have been devaluated. Christian conservatism is on the rise to put an end to it (Reagan, etc). Consent and marriage ages are pushed even higher, ostensibly to protect children. Now we are in a vicious cycle. Even as a stern traditionalist anti-modern reactionary, you should not embrace lower consent and marriage laws right now. Because in this broken society, it would only lead to abuse by hedonists. Girls would be used up by 16 and turned into nihilistic feminist single moms earlier than even today. Stupid YouTube and Instagram chads would go around having harems of young girls without responsibility. But in a traditional society where sex means marriage–and marriage is binding FOR LIFE–yes, age of consent laws should be as low as is regionally seen acceptable, minimum everywhere of the physical maturity of the girl. There is no sudden change in women when they turn 18. A 16 year old girl is emotionally prepared for marriage, and it always has been that case. I hope this reconciles both parties in this debate. Also, I want to point to J. D. Unwin’s Sex & Culture; the study of all major civilizations and their decline that was instrumental in the writing of Huxley’s “Brave New World.”


141a8c  No.11938544

>>11938485

A real alpha male has no issue marrying a child bride. You're obviously just a lefty soyboy.


141a8c  No.11938600

>>11938485

Bottomline is we should let people (regardless of age) decide for themselves. We need to stop trying to control and create more laws and regulations over the lives of other people.

Live and let live (as long as no one is getting harmed/hurt).


8ae01b  No.11938605

>>11938544

Not an argument. You didn’t read a word of it.

>>11938600

>oy vey the child consented

>>>/suicide/ now, yid.


c2051a  No.11938988

>>11938605

Of course children under 12 or so cant consent (as far as I know) but that didn't stop God's soldiers in the bible, many rabbis, and billions of men throughout history from taking young virgins as wives

How can you expect people to follow the man-made laws of "age of consent" when there's a long history of billions of men having the desire to be with young girls and going forward with it? I believe it's in the blood, the dna, the genetic code to be attracted to minors (great grandparents and ancestors all had young wives) so it's definitely in our genetic code if we like it or not…. to breed with girls as soon as they are at the age of puberty and can have babies (whatever age that may be). These sexual urges and desires are normal.

If they weren't it wouldn't be happening.


8ae01b  No.11939005

>>11938988

>oy vey goyim you’re sexually attracted to the lack of sexual characteristics because i say you are

You think this will work on us? Answer the fucking question.


2e38ae  No.11939128

>>11939005

it wasn't just jews

practically every civilization had men attracted to minors/childrenn

but they weren't seen in a derogatory way until the 1900s apparently

it was normal and accepted for thousands of years

I grew up thinking everyone had sex in their late teens or early 20s and got a wife and had kids by the time they were 30. I never learned the truth until a week ago. Everyone's great grandpa and male ancestors were pedos who married young girls and got them pregnant before they were even an adult.

So what? you say…

It's a big fucking deal to know about this

and realize how upside down this world is

because of all the lies and dishonesty

of the media and what the government tries to hide from us

the same government who allowed the age of consent to be 10 in 1885

what else are they lying about?

were all the presidents before 1900 married to little girls?

I bet they were and they've fed us the idea they were older women in paintings

what other lies are there yet to be uncovered?


8ae01b  No.11939581

>>11939128

>it wasn’t just jews

Thanks for asserting something that no one questioned, you fucking pilpul-pushing snipdick. We’re wise to your tricks. Nothing you have said is true, period. Nothing you have said is healthy, period. We don’t support childfuckers here. We kill them.


219222  No.11941974

>>11939581

>Nothing you have said is true, period.

Everything I said is backed up by links which used numerous credible/accurate information of their own.

Bottomline is billions of our male ancestors married young girls (some as young as 3 in the case of Jews/Rabbis). The bible indicates that around puberty is the age a female should be married and have children. Mary is said to be 12 when she married Joseph who was in his 90s according to most biblical scholars. She gave birth to Jesus at 13. Isaac married Rebekah at the age of 3 according to most Rabbi's and biblical scholars. You have a long history of girls being married really young and having children before their breasts and bodies are even fully developed. Some before they even started puberty. Many "holy texts" talk about grooming a girl to be a good wife.

The biggest #pedogate scandal is the fact that nearly all religions allow child marriage to take place and that our male ancestors would wed & have sex with young girls. This was normal throughout history. Technically we're all the product of our ancestors, many of which participated in what would be considered pedophilia & incest today.

I'm not advocating for pedophilia but you can't deny the facts I'm presenting to you. In any case I'm done with this conversation. Hopefully it expands your mind enough to help you understand why males may be attracted to young girls. Our history is filled with men marrying young girls and having children with them, so it's every man's genetic code & lineage to breed with young girls around the age of puberty (which varies). Why demonize it when there's a perfect explanation for why this would be.

There's more scientific reasoning for why straight men are attracted to young girls than homosexuality, transgenderism, and other weird things.

You can create laws that one must be 18-21 before sex or marriage, but that won't prevent the natural desires many men have to breed with young girls.


000000  No.11942116

>>11941974

I don't know if others will care, but at least distinguish pedo, hebe, and ephe-philia.


219222  No.11942142

>>11942116

hebe/ephe's aren't recognized by the law or psychologists so it doesn't really matter in real life scenarios

A 18yo who is dating a 13yo (or a 20yo dating a 15yo or a 21yo dating a 16yo) is considered a "pedo" and a "sexual offender" by psychologists and the law regardless of the teenager's consent.


37e319  No.11942222

File: b8ab07e0c65450f⋯.png (266.78 KB, 1862x544, 931:272, but why.PNG)

Why was this thread just deleted? did the tor nigger do it himself?


8ae01b  No.11942228

>>11942222

4. No duplicates - if several threads are made about the same subject, all but one of them will be deleted and redirected to the active thread.


8ae01b  No.11942233

>>11941974

Nope, you were already proven wrong. Kill yourself, yid.


37e319  No.11942240

>>11942228

Mind directing me to the active one? I seem to be retarded.


8ae01b  No.11942247

>>11942240

Sure thing: >>11939083


33c7e3  No.11942348

File: 80b6bb2413d0a23⋯.jpeg (113.78 KB, 1436x360, 359:90, jewish female immigrants.jpeg)

File: 621b1c30ce9cd17⋯.jpeg (119.97 KB, 912x1346, 456:673, 1880.jpeg)

>>11942233

You're an idiot.

https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/09/09/age-of-consent-in-european-american-history/

https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/09/13/the-age-of-consent-laws-in-america-1800s/

In the late 1890's women's right groups (created by jews), purity groups (created by jews), and other female jewish immigrants started outrage campaigns against the age of consent. Eventually between 1895-1905 age of consent was changed in each state as people were made to feel as if it was wrong.

So if you're happy the age of consent is now 16-18, thank these Jewish women who caused enough outrage to get the laws changed you kike!


480a40  No.11942455

>>11942348

>>11942348

in other words, age of consent for the goyim, but babyrape and pedophilia is O.K. for G-d's chosen!


b3638a  No.11942517

>>11942455

Exactly. They want to take away our freedom of choice and the ability for ourselves to decide & reason what is wrong & right within the context of our own lives! They want to take away the mutual consent between two parties and govern over every little aspect of our lives in hopes of destroying it. They want everyone to be under a draconian law system while they get away with every sinister & horrible thing behind-the-scenes. This is why Jesus Christ was adamantly against the Pharisees, Rabbi's and leaders of his day who created ridiculous laws that they couldn't follow. They were evil hypocrites.


b3638a  No.11942601

BTW, I'm a female. Many of you most likely thought I was a male.

I started looking into pedophilia, age of consent, and other things when I was a 18yo virgin because I had a sexual issue with my vagina. My vagina was too tight. I couldn't even get a finger up there without it being painful (many other females have this issue).

When I learned that in "normal times" girls were getting married and having sex with their husbands at very young ages it dawned on me that I should have started having sex and being "stretched out"(for lack of a better word) really young so my vagina would expand and could accommodate a penis.

It's known within medical circles that little girls are more limber (it's easier for them to stretch, do splits, etc.) and their vaginas expand and contract more easily than an adult woman. It's also known that if a girl isn't having her vagina expanded will stay tight making it more painful for her during sex.

Because I did not have any sexual partners and was told that masturbation/fingering was wrong my vagina stayed tight. To this day I'm dealing with this issue all because of these draconian laws in place which have basically ruined any of my future sexual experiences.

I know many other women who're dealing with the same issue of a vagina that is too tight. It's one of the most common complaints.


42622e  No.11942702

>>11942601

whoawhoawhoa

I had a best friend who fingered herself since middleschool and masterbated with the water in the tub. She also had the same issue you're stating and she was no where near as weird as you. You're a shill and lieing.

>>11942601


42622e  No.11942719

>>11941974

You are 100% shilling for pedophilia. KYS


39c9d7  No.11942755

>>11942702

Your friend wasn't diddled as a young girl and that's why she has the same issue as me That's what I'm trying to say.

Girls are meant to get married off as young girls and become the wives of their husbands. It sucks (from a women's rights point of view) but this is how it's meant to be.

If I was married as a young girl I wouldn't be having these sexual issues as a 20yo . My vagina would have had a few babies and would have expanded enough to accomodate my husbands penis and to have more babies for our family.

That's the truth if you like it or not.


39c9d7  No.11942784

>>11942719

I really don't care what you think.

I know my body.

I know the truth.

In my next life I hope I'm reborn as a child bride.


8ae01b  No.11942902

>>11942784

No one cares what you say. We will put a bullet i your head. You will burn in hell for all eternity.


c89125  No.11943010

>>11942902

There is a difference between pedophilia, men who marry child brides, and child rapists/abusers.

They aren't the same.


b53c6e  No.11943088

>>11943010

It all depends on the intention of the person.


8ae01b  No.11943144

>>11943010

No one cares what you say. This has already been explained. We will not support childfuckers, period.


43e247  No.11943220

>>11622450

why was my thread bumplocked?

>>11940094


43e247  No.11943227

my thread is news politics and current events and it is not a duplicate


58af67  No.11943293

>>11943144

FYI, you're talking to Smiley.


43e247  No.11943298

was it polvol2? did I trigger kamphy?


8ae01b  No.11943341

>>11943293

May well be, yeah. It’s obviously just a spambot of some sort.

>>11943220

Q-LARP isn’t allowed here. Yeah, you were exposing it, but the thread collapsed into bullshit SUPPORT of it. It’s nothing you did; don’t worry.

>>11943298

>still claiming that kikey has any power at all despite being proven completely wrong

Anon, please.


43e247  No.11943358

>>11943341

so if board members supports a retarded larp who gives a fuck? why bumplock it? it makes it seem like its not a larp


8ae01b  No.11943418

>>11943358

>so if board members supports a retarded larp who gives a fuck

Why would we want jewish spam here?

>it makes it seem like its not a larp

No, that’s not at all what it does. You know better than that.


b56f3c  No.11944446

kill all jews


000000  No.11945189

Sorry can't create a thread through Tor, so I'll post it here

Climate Communism

Or, the hijacking and masking of the naturally occuring change in climate (ongoing and intensifying), while blaming it on human activity and using it for political gains.

Ottmar Edenhofer, U.N. IPCC official

>we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. […] One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore

2010-11-22 [1][2]

>he [Ottmar Edenhofer] spent his savings at the age of 14 on the three volumes of Das Kapital by Karl Marx

2013-10-19 [3]

Mikhail Gorbachev, President of the Soviet Union (1990-1991)

>The threat of environmental crisis will be the 'international disaster key' that will unlock the New World Order.

1996 ("A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind" by Marilyn Brannan) [4]

Maurice Strong, organizer of the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit

>We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.

1997-09-01 (National Review magazine) [5]

Jacques Chirac, former President of France

>For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.

2000-11-20 (U.N. Conference on Climate Change in the Hague)

[6]

Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment

>No matter if the science of global warming is all phony … climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.

1988 (Calgary Herald) [5]

Timothy Wirth, heads the U.N. Foundation

>We've got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing, in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.

1993 ("Science Under Siege" by Michael Fumento) [7]

Richard E. Benedick, President of the National Council for Science and the Environment (then headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department)

>A global warming treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.

[8]

Council of the Club of Rome

>In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.

1991, ("The First Global Revolution, A Report by the Council of the Club of Rome" by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider)

[9][10]

Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UNFCCC (U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change)

>This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.

2015-02-03 [11]

[1]: https://archive.fo/wZNJH#http://thegwpf.org/ipcc-news/1877-ipcc-official-climate-policy-is-redistributing-the-worlds-wealth.html

[2]: https://archive.fo/HBF5Y#http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/schweiz/klimapolitik_verteilt_das_weltvermoegen_neu_1.8373227.html

[3]: https://web.archive.org/web/http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.13755!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/501303a.pdf

[4]: https://archive.fo/X0yWZ#http://www.sovereignindependent.com/?p=18097

[5]: https://archive.fo/lDRKf#http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/02/05/in-their-own-words-climate-alarmists-debunk-their-science

[6]: https://archive.fo/SXhYm#http://www.sovereignty.net/center/chirac.html

[7]: https://archive.fo/8VUR6#http://www.nationalcenter.org/dos7130.htm

[8]: https://web.archive.org/web/http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/zjmar07.pdf

[9]: https://web.archive.org/web/https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/first_globalrevolution.pdf

[10]: https://archive.org/details/TheFirstGlobalRevolution

[11]: https://archive.fo/9kj6U#http://www.unric.org/en/latest-un-buzz/29623-figueres-first-time-the-world-economy-is-transformed-intentionally


000000  No.11945191

>>11945189

Naturally occuring climate change

No it's not you or CO2. It's the Sun

Don't be tricked into thinking that because they lied about its causes, or the projections, that climate isn't changing.

Climate does change, it does so naturally every few hundred years or so (~400 on average). This is caused by fluctuations or lowering of solar activity which has an direct effect on the earth climate. Whenever the Sun goes into a (grand) solar minimum (decreased solar activity), Earth's weather and climate becomes more unstable, unpredictable, and extreme, and on average cools down.

The results of this are:

- Crop losses due to unfavorable climate (already well underway!)

- Famine, death due to crop losses

- Irrational human behaviour due to hunger (murder, rape, cannibalism, etc.)

- Increase in human and plant diseases due to lowered UV

- More extreme weather, such as droughts, floods, cold, etc.

Above examples are roughly what happened during the previous solar minima (Maunder, Spörer, Wolf, etc.)

The purpose of the Global Warming lie

Simply put the purpose is to have you as unprepared for the already present and intensifying climatic changes as possible and to cause the greatest possible damage (e.g. "Energy Transition", "Replacement Migration").

Here are some examples of the lie, and the reality:

- Temperatures rising? Nope, lowering due to decreased solar activity (solar minima)

- Ice melting? Nope increasing due to lowered temperatures

- Sea levels rising? Nope, lowering due to increasing ice (ice floats)

- CO2 causing temperature rise? Nope, temperature causes CO2 to rise (see Vostok ice core data)

Some web resources

YouTube Channels:

Adapt 2030: https://www.youtube.com/user/MyanmarLiving

Ice Age Farmer: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI-Am0t4qQaP_Do9FwMWw3Q

Websites:

https://iceagenow.info/

https://wattsupwiththat.com/

http://www.ice-age-ahead-iaa.ca/

http://www.iceagefarmer.com/

https://watchers.news/

https://www.climatedepot.com/

https://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com

http://notrickszone.com

http://www.severe-weather.eu/

https://twitter.com/severeweatherEU

So … what do we do!?

I don't know, grow your own food in-doors? Stockpile? Prepare to deal with a bunch of hungry emaciated people trying to murder you for food*?

* Hmm, maybe this is why the media is pushing Zombies and cannibalism?

Also if you don't believe me, don't. Do your own research. But you have to know that this has happened every 400 years on average and the onset correlates with what is happening right now: There are more extreme weather conditions, floods, hail storms, blizzards, anomalous temperatures, crop losses, volcanic activity, etc.

We're in deep shit here. But I wish you all the best of luck!


6a6c2b  No.11946242

>>11924980

>police shoot a robber

>this is now "bad"


6a6c2b  No.11946269

File: 38cb2609ff082e5⋯.jpg (45.76 KB, 590x400, 59:40, BL4.jpg)

>>11930655

>>We dont need to see niggers dead

>

>cuck

He's right, anon.

I have no interest in seeing people slaughtered for the accident of where they were born. If they leave for Liberia peacefully, why would I want to kill them?

The Jew turned these people into what they are today, the Jew poisoned their minds to hate whites, the Jew also poisoned the minds of many whites to crave their own genocide. The Jew needs to be destroyed, in every white country, and, even then, I'm still not convinced that some of them could be deported to Israel and not slaughtered. Some are just as duped as the rest of the Jew's victims.

A white nation, a place for whites to live a white lifestyle, without interference from the other races…this is what I want, as it is all we need to expand beyond our current limitations, to the stars.

I will shed blood, but I have no craving for it.


8ae01b  No.11946494

>>11945189

1. You can create a thread through tor, newfag.

2. No, you WON’T just post it here. You will go back and either get off tor, or you’ll try again. In fact, I’ll just do it for you.

>>11946269

>I have no interest in

Then you’re not a /pol/ack, and you don’t comprehend a single fucking word of the FOUNDATIONAL BELIEFS OF OUR WORLDVIEW.

You do not belong here. You need to leave.

>if they leave peacefully why would i want to kill them

BECAUSE THEY’RE STILL ALIVE. BECAUSE THEY WILL ALWAYS BE AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO YOUR (or should I say ✡your✡) SPECIES. BECAUSE THEY POLLUTE AND DESTROY THE WORLD THAT IS OUR BIRTHRIGHT.

>i’m not convinced we should kill all jews

Get the fuck out, now. You are clearly spam.


af7de5  No.11946809

>>11877430

But you do believe in White nationalism yes? Not white supremacy where whites rule the whole world? I'm fine with white nationalism.


43e247  No.11946831

File: f133a8bec5b0185⋯.png (130.07 KB, 1655x410, 331:82, retarded-mods.png)

why do you not allow the debunking of a larp?


8ae01b  No.11946868

>>11946831

If you look at the log, you’ll see that your question didn’t even need to be asked.

>>11946809

In what way are whites NOT supreme?


af7de5  No.11946885

>>11946868

I'll admit that whites are supreme as many inventions come from them. But what you suggest is that whites should move to non-white countries and murder everyone living there. Why not stick to your own countries and set your own borders?


b56f3c  No.11947338

Mods and vols pls respond if youre reading this thread

Also can I be a dedicated vol?


040412  No.11947355

>>11947338

No

No

Faggot


b56f3c  No.11947365

>>11947355

bud wyy?


8ae01b  No.11947563

>>11946885

Where am I suggesting that? You, like so many other newfags (a term which here means “people who floated in here in the wake of Donald Trump’s rise to political power”) utterly fail to comprehend the nature of gradations. You don’t know what the zone of tantalus is, nor how the Overton Window works. You can’t parse our near-term and far-term plans, either for malicious reasons or just because you don’t understand them.

The goal of the white race (as is the goal of all other races) is to see the planet completely white (non-white; replace terms as needed). Why? Because the other four races of humanity are separate species. We are competitors for the same resources. No, it doesn’t matter that niggers are utterly incapable of ever advancing to the point that they will ever NEED to process metal or create wheels or even have the written word. It doesn’t matter that they’re not using–and will never use–the world’s resources, because their existence prevents US from using them, and we would. Not even in the sense that “we have our own nations and they have theirs”, because the ground under their nations (if you can even call them that) has resources that we want. And there is no excuse nor explanation for why we, with our superior might, should not “be allowed” to conquer them if we have the capability to do so.

Other species represent an existential threat to our own survival.

This is one of the fundamental understandings of /pol/ack ideology. As such, the absolute eventual long-term goal is the reconquista of all stolen white colonies, the extermination of nonwhites (not just blacks), and the population of the whole world with whites and whites alone, taking advantage its resources and protecting its natural beauty.

BUT WE CAN’T VERY WELL DO THAT IF WE DON’T EVEN HAVE OUR OWN WHITE NATIONS NOW, NOW CAN WE? And so the short-term (notice that this is a different word than “long-term”) goal is to reestablish white ethnostates. The only way to do this is through race war. It cannot be done any other way. /pol/acks understand this, because we understand that no nonwhites are going to leave white nations (where they’re coddled and every whim catered to) peacefully, or by choice. Ever. So we SEEK race war, because not only does it reestablish white ethnostates now, it creates LESS WORK FOR US LATER, because the implication is that many or most of the nonwhites already in white nations will be EXTERMINATED. Yes, plenty thousands will simply be rounded up and deported. But we should venture to kill as many as we can as quickly as we can before the moderates (which always rise in response to overall war exhaustion in the population) start simply deporting. We WILL have our ethnostates back, but restoring white nations is not the same process–and does not need to happen at the same time as–white reconquista of the world.

Someone copy and paste this shit, because I’m sick and fucking tired of having to rewrite it to explain to newfags who are still brainwashed by leftist modes of thought.


42622e  No.11947616

>11942784

You forget that if you're "reborn" you likely wont be reborn with a super rare condition in a female body again, that said, i 100% don't think youre a female.

>>11942784


af7de5  No.11947735

>>11947563

>races compete with each other

fair enough. But it is not as if you hate other races but just love your own, yes?


22536f  No.11947749

File: 7187797b81897fc⋯.png (36.31 KB, 300x100, 3:1, jewboi faggot banner.png)


000000  No.11947947

hello admin


48f4ba  No.11947971

Just a heads up, a certain internet movement on a non listed board is at their 'gamers are dead' phase, just having had a coordinated attack on them by the msm. Larping discussions aside, emails to advertisers should be encouraged and opportunities of education are abounds.


8ae01b  No.11947988

>>11947971

It’s very interesting that the Q-LARP boards aren’t listed here. And no, Q-LARP is a proven jewish hoax. The media has been talking about their controlled opposition for quite some time and nothing has come of either “side” yet.

>>11947735

You don’t really seem literate.


cfcb5a  No.11948940

>>11942601

is this supposed to be an argument for pedophilia. Unbelievable.


cfcb5a  No.11948972

>>11945191

I've also read that every 1200 years or so (at least that we can determine anyway) the Earth goes into on average a 100 year period where temperatures are higher than normal and after that 100 year period it reverts back to the norm. So basically it's cyclical. The current 100 year period started in the 1970's so around 55 years to go.

I agree it's all a money grab and the dumb people of California are being taken advantage of by their Marxist overlords in Sacramento. Or as I like to call them members of the Cult of Global Warming.


aadbc7  No.11948995

File: 6d621999d5579f4⋯.png (94.9 KB, 1186x296, 593:148, sss.png)

Mods are Q-Tards

No Doubt

Please save this image and repost it

change the contrast or something by an nth of a degree, save it, then repost it.


8ae01b  No.11949011

>>11948995

>mods are Qcumbers

>ignore that they delete all Q-LARP threads

You’re ban evading and you mass spammed the board. No one supports Q-LARP here. Don’t spam this image anymore.


aadbc7  No.11949040

>>11949011

Are you fucking shitting me?

Last thread that was "Anti-Q" was deleted.

Mods have deleted several postings within the below thread, most importantly, the pic related in

>>11948995

And just that posting alone was deleted without deleting the thread

https://8ch.net/pol/res/11945421.html

http://archive.is/91RPC - 1 Aug 2018 @ 0933 hrs (probably GMT)

http://archive.is/UDxOS - 1 Aug 2018 @ 1706 hrs

http://archive.is/GmNWr - 1 Aug 2018 @ 2059 hrs

http://archive.is/2Yv6o - 1 Aug 2018 @ 2159 hrs

The mods support the Q-Larp.

Period.

Unbelievable.

If not, prove it.


aadbc7  No.11949053

Ok, I shouldn't have spammed the board with it.

I agree.

I have good intentions, with poor execution.

Okay.

If that's the case, how exactly should one share that image to the maximum amount of Anons?

One fine fellow started a thread with that image, and the thread was deleted by mods.

Why?

it's "Anti-Q"

Mods support the Q-larp

there's no other way that this crap would have happened.


8ae01b  No.11949316

>>11949040

>last thread that was anti-q was deleted

And so were all the pro-Q ones. /pol/ doesn’t want any Q shit at all. It has a containment board for a reason.

>the mods support something that they unequivocally do not support, because i say they do

>ignore all evidence

You’re clearly not here on honest terms.

>how exactly should one share that image to the maximum amount of Anons?

I hear voat is pretty anti-Q. And I bet even reddit still has a Q-LARP board. You’ll be banned everywhere you post anti-q shit on pro-q boards, no matter what the website. But at least you could brigade them there instead of here.


aadbc7  No.11949442

File: 051eb5b78fd2b62⋯.png (55.85 KB, 512x504, 64:63, ClipboardImage.png)


b90672  No.11950313

>>11948995

Why the fuck is this image being censored by the mods? I saw several posts with this image that were deleted.

>>11949011

>>11949316

>subverting the QLarp is "brigading" /pol/

Wrong faggot, we need to hijack the QLarp. It's a fantastic idea, pure /pol/ counter-intelligence subversion. If you have a problem with this you're either a shill who is pretending to be against the QLarp because you want /pol/ and the Qtards to stay far away from one another so that /pol/ doesn't contaminate the QLarp with counter-intelligence subversion, or you're just a fucking faggot who can't into ops.

Which is it sperg?


8ae01b  No.11950596

>>11950313

>why was a post being spammed dozens of times in every thread regardless of content deleted

It is a mystery.

>we need to hijack the QLarp.

I agree completely, if that’s at all possible. We have a thread on that right now.


aadbc7  No.11950693

>>11950596

thank you jesus


b56f3c  No.11951735

Please forgive me for advertising and shilling but I want people to know that /PedoWood322/ is back and under new administration

I made this post to let everyone here know that the original >>>/pedowood322/ is now back under my care. It is a dedicated board for investigating anything and everything pedowood/pizzagate and the international networks of human trafficking.

I know that it's a touchy subject and hard redpill for many normalfags to swallow but of utmost importance to everyone here so I aim to let you all know that it's always open to /pol/ and I aim for it to be a bit of a sister board for this one.

I invite everyone that decides to make a thread related to the subject here to also please crosspost to /Pedowood322/.

Thanks for your attention, I hope I can be a good mod people. /pol/ is always right

somebody has to stop these kikes


65d305  No.11951929

>>11951735

>Pizzagate

You mean the retarded conspiracy theory invented by two US military psych warfare Jews (Jack Posobiec and David Seaman)?


8e387e  No.11952057

>>11951929

If you want to try and discredit pizzatavistock, then try to explain away the handkerchief (black w/ white) with a map that seems pizza related. I'm waiting.


65d305  No.11952102

>>11952057

Try to explain away flat earth, gay frogs, and cancer viruses in the vaccines.

You can't.

Checkmate, Satan worshiping Illuminati Scum.


8e387e  No.11952148

>>11952102

What the fuck are you even talking about? As I suspected, you have nothing. Why is Comet Ping Pong, supposedly a "family" restaurant, covered in paintings of children dying and being devoured? Same question about John Podesta's house. Why did Lloyd Kaufman thank James Gunn for not outing him as his NAMBLA mentor? Why did Dan Harmon record a video of a baby touching his penis? Why did Justin Roiland make a cartoon where the joke is that children are being mutilated and forced to eat feces? Why specifically did the kid in ET call his brother "penis breath"?


b56f3c  No.11952201

>>11951929

>>11952102

Hey jew, me again, >>>/pedowood322/ is back and under new administration

Thanks for your attention. /pol/ is always right, somebody has to stop these kikes


f0b1e3  No.11952208

Perkele!!! We need beer in Sweden!!!!!


8e387e  No.11952216

>>11952201

He'll never be able to explain why Podesta complained about traffic being warm and weird in light of Hastert, or why Keith Raniere, Alison Mack, and Claire Bronfman have been detained for child trafficking.

Here's another link to the new >>>/pedowood322/ so it's on the front page again.


aadbc7  No.11953009

>>11949316

>>11949011

>>11950313

>>11950596

I hope you are in this thread now

Operation J

>>11950257


8ae01b  No.11953524

>>11953009

I love it, as I already said. If there's going to be any Q-spam here (there shouldn't be), it should be ways to subvert it and ways to get people to learn the truth from it.


aadbc7  No.11953545

File: 18cd650948a56ef⋯.png (42.56 KB, 801x477, 89:53, ClipboardImage.png)

>>11953524

cringy meme for you


000000  No.11954249

Where can I meet other right-wingers, /pol/?

All day long I have to hang around libshits, get leftist propaganda shoved in my face constantly, and see shitskins everywhere I go. It's so depressing and alienating, I don't see a whole lot of other white people where I live, and almost all of the white people I do know are leftist cucks who hate white people.

Where can I go to meet other like-minded people and interact with them on a personal level? This place is good, but it's anonymous so it's not like you can message people and talk to them by themselves. I want to make friends I can talk about politics with.

I have an email address, leibwiht AT airmail.cc if anyone is interested.


49e38b  No.11954522

>>11954249

Gun clubs and "kosher" nationalism demonstrations like the MAGApede bullshit. Always hide your power level in public unless you're 100% about someone - don't doubt the social ramifications. Save the brash statements for propaganda and posters. You can still meet good people in the center-Right, and I'm sure some of them will be hiding their power level too desperate to avoid that alienation you feel in a multicultural hellhole.


5caffe  No.11955799

Does anybody know which branches of the US military that Alex McNabb and Jesse Dunstan were enlisted in?


b56f3c  No.11957558

>>11955799

i dont think anyone in TRS has had prior military experience


d4109c  No.11958250

>>11955799

>>11957558

Pretty sure one or more of the TRS affiliated guys was caught with stolen valor at least of the non-combat vet larping as one variety


af7de5  No.11958289

>>11958250

>stolen valor

I just never understood this. Why would you ever want to LARP as a soldier?


af7de5  No.11958294

I have a question - why does /pol/ hate the Daily Shoah and those behind it?


b56f3c  No.11958529

>>11958294

Because at the very least throughout the years they have shown they do not deserve your trust.

-Sven I think hes an honest fellow who saw money pouring in from successful podcasting and so hes involved himself and kept at it for the money, at least he has 2 white kids.

-Enoch was married to a jewess and I don't blame him for that, he had hinted at coming from a "very liberal family background" earlier in his life, THATS FINE. But all he had to do then and there was come out with it. But he got doxxed, it came out his wife is a jew and not just any jewess, but one who worked pushing diversity. Enoch himself, is jewish, and refuses to admit it and everyone in TRS covers for him(his dad's facebook is as jewish as it gets), we have pictures of his family celebrating a dinner with the shabbat candle ata table(not a menorah, but 2 separate candles at a separate table and on the dinner table, no his wife wasnt in that pic)

-Bulbasaur/Ghoul, I wouldnt trust those 2 even without people telling me there faggots or anything. Much less so after both of them got doxxed, completely disappeared, why? They all got doxxed but enoch/sven stayed around, where their convictions just not true? Is what that believed in not right that they hid away immediately?

-McNabb I have never heard this guy say anything special in any of the shoah podcasts ive ever listened to.

TRS as it stands is a pressure release valve at the least, controleld oppo and getting people into trouble at worst, see charlottesvilel and every other event they came out for, but that's not all, it was fine when Trad Workers Party had their backs in every public event but when fatso fucked up threw all of them and that entire organization under the bus. For no reason. TRS comes from a middle class background that disdains working class americans, and it shows they're all big city yanks.

>>11958250

I believe youre referring to a dude who called himself mosley, he was doxxed here,t urns out he was a jew too


b56f3c  No.11958534

>>11958529

forgive my typos, its a million o clock to me.


af7de5  No.11958554

Does anyone listen to The Third Rail podcast by a guy called Spectre? He's pretty interesting.


f14663  No.11958609

File: bba7fcf6dcf0365⋯.png (67.8 KB, 501x582, 167:194, spicy.png)


8ae01b  No.11958695

>>11958609

Q-kikes are already rationalizing. "It's not fake unless Trump says so!" Of course, when Trump says so, they'll say that it's still real.


1c4afd  No.11958936

>>11958554 what we're the topics?


06583f  No.11959030

I'm out of the loop, I've been away and I don't know why people are posting gore and killing threads instantly?


06583f  No.11959036

>>11959030

That was a shitty way to end my question, could someone please enlighten me, I'd really appreciate your time.


000000  No.11959095

>>11959036

It' be great if moderators could append a message to posts that were simply deleted (visible in the log) to explain the reason for deletions that didn't warrant a ban (*cough* feature request *cough*). imkikey destroyed users' trust in the board's moderation, and getting that back is being… a little hindered by restrictions at the moment. Deletions like that run on a pretty simple system:

If the thread was a one-liner question and was deleted, it belonged in QTDDTOT.

If the thread was totally off-topic for the board and was deleted, it should've gone on the relevant board.

If the thread was on-topic and was deleted, we already had a thread about it here, and they should've checked the catalog.

And then there's outright spam, raiding, and bait. Bait is pretty obvious-looking once you know /pol/'s beliefs. But that stuff gets a ban (and therefore ban reason), too, so it's less ambiguous.

This thread exists for all other questions about moderation (and feature/rule requests; please give those, too.)


ca1351  No.11959110

>>11959095

>Thank you, that makes sense.


f14663  No.11959904

Why are the q fags still at it?


8ae01b  No.11959953

>>11959904

Here or in general? They won’t stop spamming us until their money dries up. Since it’s a jew-backed psy-op, that won’t happen.


6c1748  No.11960166

Wow, kikey is stepping up his game. Two bans in a day all for calling his kike ass a fucking kike.


6c1748  No.11960168

And the salty cunt purges all the comments. Pottery.


a8a1d4  No.11960224

File: e66cb772e888140⋯.jpg (82.14 KB, 700x600, 7:6, desu reading.jpg)

>>11960168

>>11960166

My my, someone's butthurt and banevading


6c1748  No.11960251

>>11960224

My my, kikey said specifically to come and post it in the meta. Kill yourself kikey.


6c1748  No.11960254

As if anyone needed further proof.

>>11960224


a8a1d4  No.11960265

File: 72c470102cda1b0⋯.gif (129.31 KB, 208x198, 104:99, huge faggot.gif)

>replying twice

Oh please


cf112d  No.11960321

>>11960265

>defending imkamp…. I mean polvol2

kill yourself


8ae01b  No.11960354

>>11960321

>every single mod is imkikey

>who never left, despite codemonkey explicitly kicking him for all eternity

>IGNORE THAT I ABJECTLY REFUSE TO TYPE IMKIKEY’S NAME IN ANY WAY OTHER THAN THE WAY I–I MEAN HE–SPELLED IT

It’s just too fucking easy. It really is. Are you even trying? It’s not like this is a cover tactic for something else, because you’re not even doing anything else. Is this just really how bad you are at subversion when you’re not a mod?


a8a1d4  No.11960396

>>11960354

The best part has to be the people claiming coonfy was never removed, this was all just a show and CM told coonfy to keep it down.

>coonfy

>keeping it down


f7a651  No.11960797

>autosaging a pedowood thread

>leaving "SPAM 4CHAN GUYS" up

Good to see the current moderation is as fucking retarded as the old.


6c1748  No.11960986

File: 9fd838c3049f0a6⋯.gif (2.68 MB, 400x225, 16:9, Implications.gif)

>>11960797

>implying there was even a change


b90672  No.11961102

File: 72f32c34e118e6f⋯.jpg (33.63 KB, 540x390, 18:13, 72f32c34e118e6f3f038192ef0….jpg)

The thread linking Sam Hyde's video about the pedophiles at Adult Swim should not have been anchored.

Justify your decision to do, polvol2.

There are many other threads in the catalog with videos featuring youtubers talking on one subject or another and they aren't bumplocked. I find the decision to bumplock that one thread in particular suspicious, especially given that there are obvious kike shills on the board celebrating the fact that it was bump locked.


6c1748  No.11961166

>>11961102

We celebrate a higher posting standard than you find in your cuckchan stomping ground. You fail at that, moshe. Come correct if you want to earn your boy Samuel a few shekels.


b90672  No.11961176

>>11961166

Are you polvol2? If not then why the fuck do you think I care what you think, kike?


f7a651  No.11961185

>>11961166

Kampfy detected.


6c1748  No.11961201

OK everyone new rule, ONLY PEDOWOOD POSTING ALLOWED. Everything lese is a slide as declared by the jews distracting us from other shit ALSO happening.


6c1748  No.11961209

We /polowood/ now!


b90672  No.11961228

File: fc47d5a20628fa0⋯.png (19.74 KB, 1131x107, 1131:107, bumplocked.png)

File: f99ec3b5a842eab⋯.png (470.04 KB, 441x641, 441:641, 1518170665693.png)

>>11961102

The one who reported the thread to be bumplocked was literally the "Sam Hyde is a crypto-jew" spammer:

>>11961086

His posting style matches that of Kampfy's.


f7a651  No.11961229

>>11961209

>>11961201

Your fear is pungent, schlomo.


6c1748  No.11961245

Can't hear you, I have PEDOS to post about in unrelated threads. Well that's not true, all threads are pedowood threads, amiright my fellow goy?


f7a651  No.11961470

The (((polvol2))) fears the pedowood investigation.


6c1748  No.11961487

>>11961470

Which is why there are pedowood threads still up? Get over yourself, your posts are shit and you should feel ashamed you take shekels for them.


6c1748  No.11961513

Rut roh, did polvol2 ban your dickbeater thread too?


f7a651  No.11961521

>>11961487

>>11961513

>kikefy runs overtime defending his shit moderation


a8a1d4  No.11961527

File: d34bcb2c2c83319⋯.gif (511.6 KB, 500x500, 1:1, dancing inkling.gif)

wtf is going on here


6c1748  No.11961550

>>11961521

If you weren't a nigger you would see in my posting that I have in fact achieved two fucking bans yesterday/today. Pretty sure I'm not a vol. kek


6c1748  No.11961557

And why was I banned? Glad you asked. I was banned for calling the kike mods kikes for acting like kikes with their moderation. kek


b90672  No.11961577

>>11961550

>>11961557

>if I pretend I'm a user that got banned they won't think I'm a mod gargling my own balls


6c1748  No.11961586

polvol2, if you're monitoring, did you or did you not ban anon for calling you mods fucking kikes and tell anon to come and post it in the meta in the wee hours this morning?


af7de5  No.11961596


6c1748  No.11961610

>>11961577

Further, I posted about the ban BEFORE you cunts hopped in here to whine.


b90672  No.11961658

>>11961610

>implying you don't regularly use a VPN to whine about bans that never happened to use as a cover to defend your kiked moderation decisions


6c1748  No.11961692

>>11961658

>implying that kikey and anon could be standing right in front of you and you wouldn't keep pushing the lie


b90672  No.11961766

File: 81ac096ced7567a⋯.png (298.54 KB, 499x641, 499:641, 1517869313569.png)

File: 29c1d0d5b8d343a⋯.jpg (108.21 KB, 782x782, 1:1, 1517249631266.jpg)

>>11961692

>"I've been found out!"


d0cca3  No.11961773

File: 301df7c4607ec7e⋯.png (360.9 KB, 512x512, 1:1, Z7HeRxU.png)

>Funpost thread deleted

Way to go mods, you sure stopped those kikes now.


000000  No.11961833

>>11961586

>did you or did you not ban anon for calling you mods fucking kikes

Nope. That wasn't the reason. Feel free to say anything you want about the moderation…

>tell anon to come and post it in the meta

…in the meta thread. Actual /pol/acks know why the meta thread is here (in fact, the early discussion was pretty good), but for the sake of exposing shilling behavior I'll repeat it. The meta thread is here to say what you will about the mods (and to suggest rule changes/additions, as well as other board improvements), because the idea is that the moderators serve the community. kikey/pol/ was highlighted by open hostility by the moderation staff toward /pol/acks, and otherwise zero communication therewith or accountability thereto. Oh, except to fucking lord his position over us every chance he got, mock users in threads he didn’t like, and use their rebuttals as an excuse to ban them. That's fucking unacceptable, right? It nearly destroyed 8/pol/.

Board rules should be as clear as possible to facilitate understanding of both the discussion and communication on the board, but also so that users of the board can understand, at a glance, why [x] moderation action is taken on [y] post. You know? Right now we have some pretty loose posting rules AND pretty strict moderation rules. Read the OP. Those are it. Seriously.

<Edit: addendum

But there are some exceptions. For example, we don’t have an official rule about QTDDTOT, but CM mentioned that we can simply lock “single question” threads after redirecting them to the existing QTDDTOT or to just delete them entirely. All three of us have unofficially also taken a soft hand to things you’d consider “bait.” Obvious drive-by shitposting that, at best, is just supposed to poke /pol/acks in the side (and at worst was designed to derail the thread on purpose). Those generally get a deletion–sometimes even without a ban, because, come on, who likes banning people? Kikey, but that’s beside the point…

<Edit ends

Not only are the rules technically THAT (yes, that) broad for posting content, they’re that restrictive for moderation content. I have never deleted anything (much less banned anyone) for personal vendettas, as per the moderator rules. I don’t like that idea in the first place, even if it wasn’t a rule. What kind of faggot would I be if I deleted everything I didn’t like to see? How would that improve me?

Finally, you haven't seen mods talk about this shit much… for a reason. I understand fully why CM wanted it this way (to preemptively stop future “kikey lording”-style actions), but it has resulted in… well, that same lack of accountability (this time not at the whim or desire of moderation). And it leads to things like kikey hopping around on various IPs, claiming to be a bunch of users, and stirring up fake shit about bad moderation*. Yeah, we’ve seen that happen. And also when regular users come back to complain (or ask questions) about moderation actions that sometimes they just don’t understand, and no one can technically reply.

So hey, here’s a post. Sort of bends his rules, but you guys need to know why we do what we do (and don’t do what we’d like to do, for you). Hopefully we can move forward in the near future and tighten up the official rules so that everyone can understand what /pol/ is and isn’t, as well as the procedure for posting (hint: check the catalog before posting a thread to see if it already exists, because then you don’t have to see your thread get deleted, make a new thread whining about it, have that thread get deleted, and then claim that kikey never left).

*Asterisk from above: No, I’m not accusing any individual recently, nor the one quoted specifically, of being imkikey in this instance. It’s just an example of what we have seen, and it’s also standard communist (and COINTELPRO) tactics to make a tiny group seem huge and turn a worthless, meaningless opinion into a false majority.

<Mod edit: Do I need to fagtext when it’s my own post? Anyway, a user reported it to suggest that I add the proper name field so it didn’t look like I was LARPing. That’s a good point; I’d forgotten about that. Anyway, hopefully this clears a few things up, both with moderation and with our current ruleset. You won’t be seeing many (if any) more named mod posts, hopefully.

Post last edited at

4ad1aa  No.11962012

>>11961833

Okay, never mind. You can’t EDIT a post with a site-set nametag. Hopefully this works.

<Edit: That’s better.

Post last edited at

a8a1d4  No.11962036

>>11961833

>>11962012

suppose you can just edit torposts with a "t. polvol2". Anyway, thanks for posting that.


b90672  No.11962131

>>11961833

>Right now we have some pretty loose posting rules AND pretty strict moderation rules. Read the OP. Those are it. Seriously.

So then why was the Sam Hyde thread bump locked?


3759fc  No.11962189

File: 4566f667c8a1330⋯.pdf (1.96 MB, JW-v.-DOJ-02046-Hillary-R.….pdf)

anyone want to start a thread on this?

U.S. Department of Justice

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

Date: 10 May 2016

To: Priya Aiyer

Acting General Counsel

U.S. Department of the Treasury

From: Peter Strzok

Section Chief

Counterespionage Section

Subject: supplemental Classification Review and Determination Request

(U//FOUO) In July 2015, the FBI received a Section 811 referral from the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community (ICIG) regarding the possible compromise of classified national security information.

(U//FOUO) The potential compromise was identified when, as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, the U.S. Department of State (DoS) and the ICIG reviewed electronic mail {email) communications from private email accounts previously used by a former Secretary of State during her tenure at Dos. An initial review of this material identified emails containing national security information later determined by the US Intelligence Community (USIC) to be classified up to the Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information level.

(U//FOUO) The FBI respectfully requests the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) conduct an official classification review and determination of the related documents contained on the accompanying DVD. This request is in addition to previous Classification Review and Requests submitted to your agency in October 2015, January 2016. While this request is separate from the previous requests, it should be responded to in similar manner.

(U//FOUO) The FBI understands you may also be reviewing materials as part of ongoing FOIA lawsuits involving some of these documents. This matter should remain separate from the FOIA matter(s) and information from this request should not be shared or co-mingled with the FOIA matter(s) to ensure the FBI's investigation is not compromised or adversely affected.

(U//FOUO) The FBI also understands that DOS may have previously received similar, separate requests from other entities for an official classification review and determination for some or all of the documents contained on the enclosed DVD. In order to ensure consistency, the FBI requests DOS de-conflict its response to this FBI request with any previous classification determination responses related to these documents, and to provide the FBI the same classification determinations. The FBI requests DOS to provide as soon as possible any previously rendered official classification determinations of documents related to this matter, to include any classification determinations of documents related to the @clintonemail.com domain that are not contained on the attached DVD. The FBI requests DOS to provide classification determination responses to the FBI on a rolling basis as they become available.

(U//FOUO) Similar to the FBI' s previous requests, the enclosed DVDs contains a ReadMe.docx file, which provides an explanation of the files contained on the DVD. The DVDs also contain a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet titled Classification Review Response Tracker to assist your agency with tracking and responding to this classification review and determination request. The documents for review are listed in the FileList.xlsx spreadsheet and are contained in the Items folder. The Items folder is further explained in the aforementioned ReadMe.docx file. In the event DOS is aware of any equities belonging to other US Government agencies contained in documents provided as part of this request, the FBI requests DOS to identify those other us Government agencies in the "Notes" section of the enclosed spreadsheet.

(U//FOUO) The FBI may contact you in the future to ask you to prioritize the review of certain items provided as part of this request.

(U//FOUO) You are requested not to disclose the existence of this inquiry or the contents of the provided media, other than as necessary for compliance; disclosure may jeopardize the confidential nature of the FBI's investigation.


3759fc  No.11962227

>>11962189

Top left corner of page 1

>ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED

>HEREIN IS UNCLASSIFIED

>DATE 10-23-2017 BY J37J85T94 NSICC


3759fc  No.11962243

>>11962227

>>11962189

initial source:

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/181166949

Document source:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/JW-v.-DOJ-02046-Hillary-R.-Clinton-Part-24-of-24.pdf


4ad1aa  No.11962388

>>11962131

Reports were submitted stating that it was a typical e-celeb thread, and that the information had already been posted concurrently in the existing R&M-specific pedowood thread. CM doesn’t want duplicates simply because that’s a soft form of board spam, but for OUR purposes, duplicates create multiple threads of information, and if you don’t visit all the threads you might miss out. We don’t want that. That specific deletion had nothing to do with the pedowood content, I assure you. One of our biggest things here is the act of exposing that.


b56f3c  No.11962414

To anyone interested in PedoWood/PizzaGate info, please post everything you have in >>>/Pedowood322/ the board is back in working order.

>>11962388

If you where able to save something pplease cross posting there, I know it's a bit of as hassle but it's a board that doesn't move much lmao dead baord but it's the best place to keep new info up top


b90672  No.11962631

File: b89023998becf25⋯.png (553.35 KB, 1467x1853, 1467:1853, muh_meta.png)

>>11962388

>Reports were submitted stating that it was a typical e-celeb thread

And you ban me for calling out your hypocrisy in anchoring a "typcial eceleb thread" in a (still) unanchored thread shilling ecelebs: >>11960759

Apply your rules consistently or don't apply them at all.

>the information had already been posted concurrently in the existing R&M-specific pedowood thread

No, it hadn't. The OP of the thread you anchored reposted the video to the Dan Harmon thread after you bumplocked his thread.

>crying about the duplicate thread being bumplocked

I'm calling you out on your biased moderation. I've been watching how this board has been moderated very closely, and the one thing I will not stand for is any kind of bias. That's a slippery slope right back into Kampfy-tier cancer town /pol/. You allow dozens of "eceleb" threads, there are many in the catalog right now. Either forbid ALL eceleb threads or allow ALL eceleb threads. Codemonkey stated that the board is now a "free speech" zone where people are to argue for why they disagree with someone or something rather than relying on kiked mods to babysit an echo chamber.

If you want to make a rule banning all "eceleb" videos, and by that definition I mean any individual speaking into a camera on youtube on any topic, then do so. But it's now at the point where you are censoring threads based on which ecelebs they feature. Today you've anchored a thread with Molyjew and Lauren Simonseon, one of Sam Hyde, and allowed a thread featuring JF and Ryan Dawson to remain. Make up your fucking mind: Are eceleb threads allowed or not? Are you going to cultivate an echo chamber of your personal favorite ecelebs and censor the rest, or are you going to allow /pol/acks to openly debate the content that's posted and make up our own minds?

Also:

>spamming a thread

Posting one post is not spam, you're really reaching here.


000000  No.11963225

I like Codemonkey. There isn't an admin as honourable as him on the entire clearnet. I dare you all to name even one that would allow us such freedom.


b9fc17  No.11963557

Cunts cunts cunts cunts cunts cunts.


9cd1cc  No.11964011

Miller swapping the cans? Hmm.


f7dde2  No.11964055

>>11957558

>i dont think anyone in TRS has had prior military experience

Are you sure about that? They're all CIA, so at least some of them have to be current or former military. I noticed a US military funerary flag resting on a piece of furniture behind Jesse Dunstan during one of TRS's YouTube podcasts from Dunstan's house, which means that at least one of Dunstan's grandfathers was in the US military, which means that Jesse Dunstan could possibly be third generation US military. I strongly suspect that the same is true of Alex McNabb also. And then there's this evidence for Mike Enoch:

Mike Enoch Interview with Andrew Marantz (New Yorker Jewish journalist)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6H2pVdmnV4

>“You know a lot of these guys are actual literal like military experience…”

>“And we have guys some of whom are ex-military some of whom are ex law enforcement…”

>“I’ve spoken to guys a lot of ex-military guys are in the alt-right and a lot of them have killed Arabs…”

Prominent White Nationalist New Yorker has Podcast with 100,000 Fans after Turning Back on Liberal Roots

https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/liberal-raised-nyc-white-nationalist-podcast-100g-fans-article-1.3483010

>Meanwhile, Peinovich’s ancestors fought against the Nazis and racism. His namesake grandfather served as a U.S. Army pilot in World War II, according to Gleissner. His great-grandfather, Peter B. Garberg, was a state’s attorney in North Dakota and was active in driving the KKK out of the state in the 1930s, Gleissner added.


b56f3c  No.11964460

>>11964055

It's because, I have a stereotypical image of what a soldier who was infantry looks like, and while I don't doubt they could have gone through military training, they just don't look like fighting men to me.

They don't look like men who where trained to be physically fit kept up with being fit.

Aside from that having grandparents in the military doesn't make them military themselves. I joined the US Army and dropped out when during basic training it was all niggers above me and I finished basic and got the fuck out of dodge.


000000  No.11964764

>>11961833

how about you stop being a gigantic faggot and let people expose (((shitstianity))) instead of deleting legitimate threads and possts that contain irrefutable, verified information? you're worse at moderating than kikey, (((niggerfaggot)))


f711f1  No.11964874

>>11964764

Anti-Christian spammers, as you obviously know, are paid jewish shills. Generally, anti-Christian content is paid jewish shilling. We all know this. You can’t fool or D&C us. Christianity stands opposed to the jew. Your subversion doesn’t work here. There was nothing legitimate about your spam threads.


7cf476  No.11964967

>>11961833

>Feel free to say anything you want about the moderation…

That's a fucking lie and you know it.

>…in the meta thread.

Yeah, there ya go. Basically, this is a containment thread, just like the old board was a containment board, its the same fucking outcome - 99% of the population isn't going to even bother trying to read this clusterfuck of a thread, so you asshats can do whatever the fuck you want basically and most of the board isn't going to be aware of whats happening in here.

The only value in a thread like this would be if you were required to respond to us at a given interval and actually address querries and such presented to you, but it doesn't seem that's actually the case at all.

And instead, you hop on proxies and shitpost at people while trying to defend yourselves - its not like we have any mechanism via which to actually monitor that, do we? No, we do not.

>Actual /pol/acks

Eat. A. Dick.

>know why the meta thread is here (in fact, the early discussion was pretty good)

No they weren't. They were your sycophants and you found that 'good'.

>but for the sake of exposing shilling behavior I'll repeat it. The meta thread is here to say what you will about the mods (and to suggest rule changes/additions, as well as other board improvements)

Which you will and do ignore outright.

>because the idea is that the moderators serve the community.

Except you don't. The rules are shit, designed specifically to facilitate shilling. We have no idea who any of chucklefucks are, but based on your activity thus far I think its safe to say you aren't "actual /pol/acks" of any sort of worth.

>kikey/pol/ was highlighted by open hostility by the moderation staff toward /pol/acks,

>and otherwise zero communication therewith or accountability thereto.

Which you still espouse completely.

Where is the accountability? How are you accountable to US? You aren't, you're accountable, AT BEST, to the administrators of the site, and we have ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to trust that they have OUR best interest or the board's best interest at heart. If anything, quite the opposite.

>Oh, except to fucking lord his position over us every chance he got, mock users in threads he didn’t like, and use their rebuttals as an excuse to ban them.

You do the exact same thing.

>That's fucking unacceptable, right? It nearly destroyed 8/pol/.

Its still destroying 8/pol/, in fact, it may well be worse, because under the former Zionist-controlled mods, there was still some attempt to maintain board culture, the likes of which simply are not seeing now. As I've said elsewhere, all we did, it appears, it trade a context wherein Zionist shills have free-reign to shitpost at their leisure with little-to-no impact upon them, for a context wherein Marxist shills AND Zionist shills have free-reign to shitpost at their leisure with EVEN LESS impact upon them.


7cf476  No.11964971

>>11964967

>All three of us have unofficially also taken a soft hand to things you’d consider “bait.”

Why? There's no benefit to that for the population - you're basically saying here "we've taken a soft hand on demoralization shilling and other assorted emotional-response trigger shilling techniques", and why the fuck would you do that?

>Obvious drive-by shitposting that, at best, is just supposed to poke /pol/acks in the side (and at worst was designed to derail the thread on purpose). Those generally get a deletion–sometimes even without a ban, because, come on, who likes banning people? Kikey, but that’s beside the point…

… What? Did you actually just try to pull a "Hitler likes water, do you like water?" on me you son of a bitch?

Kikey was a ZIONIST FUCKING SHILL. THAT was the problem - it was not that he banned people, many of whom DESERVED TO BE BANNED, it was that he also banned a whole bunch of people who only, say, said something negative about Trump, and not in some baity HURR DURR BLUMFY SUX type manner.

>Not only are the rules technically THAT (yes, that) broad for posting content, they’re that restrictive for moderation content. I have never deleted anything (much less banned anyone) for personal vendettas, as per the moderator rules.

Good. I don't know why you'd think that amounts to something even worthy of stating - thats your fucking job, to not be a hugely biased faggot. And quite frankly, I don't buy your claims for a second in that capacity, I have no reason to trust you an in any regard, and MUCH reason to distrust you.

>I don’t like that idea in the first place, even if it wasn’t a rule. What kind of faggot would I be if I deleted everything I didn’t like to see? How would that improve me?

Thats a strawman - its one thing to delete everything you don't like to see, its another to NOT delete TONS of things that are very obviously put there simply BECAUSE the people who browse /pol/ won't like to see it. How does it improve the board to allow such? It doesn't. If people want a melange of /pol/-content and shit they don't want to see, there's always cuckchan, which is just teaming with miscegenation posts and other assorted drek… Which, btw, has started manifesting here as well, now that your 'loose posting rules' have come into effect. I'll say this: I was banned COUNTLESS times by the former mods for being anti-Zionism, and I've only been banned once by you, BUT, under that previous moderation, I never saw, say, a thread supporting a Jewish youtuber being allowed on the board, I never saw people avatarfagging with sheboons while talking about white women being trash, I never saw alotta shit that was prevelant on cuckchan and not here… And now I'm seeing that, AS WELL AS the obvious Zionist shilling that had existed before. Only now there's also occasional "but muh based jews u guiz!" threads that you refuse to delete and only ever bumplock, usually without a ban. This is not an improvement nor a benefit.


7cf476  No.11964974

>>11964971

>Finally, you haven't seen mods talk about this shit much… for a reason. I understand fully why CM wanted it this way (to preemptively stop future “kikey lording”-style actions), but it has resulted in… well, that same lack of accountability (this time not at the whim or desire of moderation). And it leads to things like kikey hopping around on various IPs, claiming to be a bunch of users, and stirring up fake shit about bad moderation*.

And does that, perhaps, lead to you moderators, jumping around various IPs, claiming to be a bunch of users, and stirring up frake shit about good moderation? I'm 99% certain it does, because I've seen what amounts to proof of such in this very thread.

>Yeah, we’ve seen that happen. And also when regular users come back to complain (or ask questions) about moderation actions that sometimes they just don’t understand, and no one can technically reply.

No one can reply? What the fuck sort of fucked up ruleset behind the scenes do you have in place? Because I don't see fucking anything in the "thats it" rules saying you can't communicate with us.

In fact, when I suggested this thread back right after kampfy fell - and I did - I said outright that an integral aspect of it, to maintain accountability, was that you chucklefucks had to address the community on a regular basis as moderators.

You haven't done that. Which makes this thread just a slightly-less-concealed version of the old /polmeta/ board - its a place where the moderation staff can contain any outrage, while banning any appearance of 'meta' talk in other threads (usually critical of them, mind you), then come in here on various IPs and defend themselves while pretending to be users, while keeping all of that out of sight of the majority of the population, especially now that this thread is a revolving 700+ post thread that most people can't be assed to sort through.

>So hey, here’s a post. Sort of bends his rules, but you guys need to know why we do what we do (and don’t do what we’d like to do, for you).

You haven't told us shit in this post, except that you think anyone with a brain trusts you.

That 'actual /pol/acks line was a real fucking doozy, btw. I'm still chuckling at the implications implied.

>Hopefully we can move forward in the near future and tighten up the official rules so that everyone can understand what /pol/ is and isn’t,

Rule fucking 5. What's the deal? How do we even get a fucking response out of you on these topics when you, apparently, arent 'allowed' to converse with us?

>as well as the procedure for posting (hint: check the catalog before posting a thread to see if it already exists, because then you don’t have to see your thread get deleted, make a new thread whining about it, have that thread get deleted, and then claim that kikey never left).

Kikey never did leave, and I wouldn't be surprised if you're him.

Know what makes me say that?

The other day I got banned, for FUCKING 3 DAYS, for a few posts in a thread, requesting you fucks no longer make shill threads and posting the board log link… And guess what? You let that shill thread sit for about 20 fucking hours, then you bumplocked it, banned nobody BUT ME - despite the thread being full of anti-White bait posting, the thread ITSELF being anti-white baitposting - AND deleted all my posts… Not just those 4-5 in the thread, ALL MY FUCKING POSTS, there being far more than enough for you to have been able to tell that was a bad fucking call on your behalf, burning a field of good content because of a few bugs (which you likely introduced indirectly). This is kampfy tier.

>*Asterisk from above: No, I’m not accusing any individual recently, nor the one quoted specifically, of being imkikey in this instance. It’s just an example of what we have seen, and it’s also standard communist (and COINTELPRO) tactics to make a tiny group seem huge and turn a worthless, meaningless opinion into a false majority.

YOU DONT SAY.

And I'm sure the moderators neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeever utilize these tactics that we now have every reason to think they're aware of and utilize, right? Of coursh.


7cf476  No.11964976

>>11964974

>Board rules should be as clear as possible to facilitate understanding of both the discussion and communication on the board, but also so that users of the board can understand, at a glance, why [x] moderation action is taken on [y] post. You know? Right now we have some pretty loose posting rules AND pretty strict moderation rules. Read the OP. Those are it. Seriously.

Well then, LETS ADJUST THAT, shall we?

Isn't that what this thread is FOR?

Clearly a large portion of the population is not pleased with these 'loose posting rules'.

Rule 5, for example, that was posted above:

No shilling for Jews. No promotion of Jews as 'good' or 'acceptable in the movement'. No advertising their content.

The reasoning: /pol/ espouses a board culture, and while freedom of speech is important, so is maintaining that culture within certain bounds, specifically in the vein of keeping out Jewish subversives whose efforts would be geared towards creating a beachhead for Jewish infiltrators aiming to subvert the movements which are most-commonly promoted on /pol/.

<The meta thread is here to say what you will about the mods (and to suggest rule changes/additions, as well as other board improvements)

This is a very straight-forward rule, it is very clear: To promotion on behalf of Jews. Period.

Now, a moderation staff with any measure of accountability would be required to engage the communtiy, AS A MODERATOR (not via a fucking proxy or tor), at least one a week - and to respond to rule change suggests.

Here's a suggest. You're accountable? Okay, tell me whats up with this rule change suggestion.

Because, ya know, its funny, if I do a Ctrl+F and search for "Board Volunteer", wouldn't ya know it? Only two matches show up. Which means you faggots aren't engage the population. Which means you have no real accountability to us - you don't even talk to us, unless its from behind a mask making you seem one of us.


000000  No.11965268

>>11964874

>Anti-Christian spammers, as you obviously know, are paid jewish shills. Generally, anti-Christian content is paid jewish shilling. We all know this. You can’t fool or D&C us. Christianity stands opposed to the jew. Your subversion doesn’t work here. There was nothing legitimate about your spam threads.

Almost this entire board is anti-christian. Basically entire NSDAP were anti-christian. Any time some retarded christcuck wanders in here and posts his jew bullshit, he gets nuked by sensible anons who know better. (((You))) christcuck faggots are just like kikes with the holobunga. If your shitty dead kike on a stick was so infallible then it could take a few breads exposing it, couldn't it?

Christianity does not stand opposed to the jew, the overwhelming majority of christcucks on this earth adore kikes. The original christcucks themselves were literally all kikes. Jesus was a fucking rabbi.

What is there to divide here? Aryan men from subversive, semitic cancer. The only subersive you is (((you))), kikelord.


000000  No.11965281

>>11964976

>Because, ya know, its funny, if I do a Ctrl+F and search for "Board Volunteer", wouldn't ya know it? Only two matches show up. Which means you faggots aren't engage the population. Which means you have no real accountability to us - you don't even talk to us, unless its from behind a mask making you seem one of us.

Wow it's almost as if it's just another pair of JIDF faggots here to drive the board into the ground by censoring genuine anons, spamming the board with trash slide threads and allowing total cancer to remain clogging up the catalog. Sock. Horror. How unexpected.


e256c2  No.11965407

Q rhymes with Jew. They have infiltrated you with success. Why ask (q)uestions when you can give answers?

You’re done

They have won


4ad1aa  No.11965453

>>11964967

>it’s a lie

>ignore that it was proven to be true

Okay.

>bother trying to read

Nor should they. It’s not for people who don’t care. It’s only for procedural stuff for this site.

>do whatever the fuck you want

You’ll want to review the OP.

>required to respond

That’d be neat, yeah.

>eat a dick

Reread the post.

>no they weren’t

Okay, whatever you want to believe.

>you will and do ignore

Nope.

>the rules are shit

>designed to facilitate shilling

Yeah, I agree. They’re far too ambiguous. Fun fact: This is the thread where you suggest new rules. You also seem to be suffering under the delusion that we make the rules or run the board. We don’t. We’re moderators. CM wrote those rules and CM is the board owner. We have, in the recent past, assembled rule requests from users and e-mailed them to him for approval. He hasn’t gotten back to us yet. We’re CIA. He’s Bane. He’s in charge here.

>we have no reason to trust that they have our best interests at heart

Anon, they got rid of kikey. How do you imagine you can say that? Censoring 4chan couldn’t stop us. Three years of kiked moderation couldn’t stop us. And if they were to “go bad”, we will still endure.

>You do the exact same thing

Nope.

>it may well be worse

Again, we don’t make the rules. You don’t get this.

>shills have free reign

And no, kikes don’t have free reign here. All three of us have bent the rules quite a bit, because otherwise there’d be nothing but duplicates, leftypol threads, and spam here. Because yes, the rules don’t give any official protection against that.

>>11964971

>why

Read the rules, which we didn’t write. Did you prefer kikey’s 28523856238672386782368 year-long, /24 IP range bans? Simply for saying something HE didn’t like? If there’s shitposting and it’s the only post on the IP, it’ll just be wiped. If it’s endemic, it gets wiped with a ban. Again, none of this is in the rules, but you likely haven’t even seen it anyway, because we don’t want that shit here.

>on me

You’re not the center of the universe.

>it was that he also

Yes, we’re trying to avoid that.

>that amounts to something even worthy of stating

We’ve had accusations of it already.

>because the people of /pol/ won’t like to see it

There’s “not liking to see”, which in the case of kikey/pol/ would have been anything which didn’t suck Trump’s cock, and there’s “is obviously leftypol shilling.” Most of that should be obvious, but we also get ban evading trolls with false indignance.

I’ll continue in another post.


4ad1aa  No.11965545

>>11964971

>This is not an improvement nor a benefit.

Tell CM. Seriously. I personally agree, but my feelings don’t matter in this regard.

>>11964974

>I'm 99% certain it does, because I've seen what amounts to proof of such in this very thread.

The other two don’t strike me as vain, and I’m just a worthless piece of shit so what do I care about anonymous people telling me they like me? Being free of kikey is enough for a lot of /pol/acks, anon. The culture of /pol/ is that there isn’t (shouldn’t be) an “enough”, so a lot of that is just catching their collective breath after 3 years of being beaten down. Wider calls for tighter moderation would be needed for CM to do something, I think.

>>11964974

>what sort of fucked-up ruleset behind the scenes

See, I’m still not sure I even ought to say. That’s the only reason I didn’t lay THAT out in the earlier post, too. Having read them, I can say that it’s all CM’s reaction to what kikey was to this board, and I fully understand why those rules are in place and do respect them. My post above technically breaks them. So does this one. I just got sick of NOT being able to tell the community what’s going on. It’s my feeling (though who knows if I’m alone, other than you) that our “transition period” has been long enough. But it’s on CM to decide otherwise.

>banning any appearance of meta talk in other threads

When I say “say anything you want about us here”, I do mean that. Kikey’s /polmeta/ was a literal joke. It served no purpose and was never addressed. This thread’s the real deal. If you want to draw up some more rules, we’ll literally pass them on to CM and see what he says.

>rule fucking 5

Exactly. Again, that’s CM’s purview. Sorry if that has been unclear so far.

> neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeever utilize these tactics that we now have every reason to think they're aware of and utilize, right?

So simply because you know how jews behave, you clearly MUST also act like a jew? That knowledge intrinsically begets the behavior? Anon, please.

>>11964976

>rule 5

>No shilling for jews. No promotion of jews as ‘good’ or ‘acceptable.’ No advertising their content.

It’s a good rule. You would have to make sure to define “their content”, however. It doesn’t need to be legalese or unnecessarily verbose. Say that we knew, officially, that “their content” implies, for example, “any e-celebrity that does not explicitly denounce judaism as a concept, jews as a whole, or jewish behavior as a set of behaviors.” That would quickly and easily cover virtually every e-celeb thread as “content that isn’t allowed.” See? We wouldn’t need a list of names, just a rule for behavior and its support. It’s a good start. I also like your reasoning. I personally think that text should be official. It reads a bit like what Hitler said about how “the individual” must be in consonance with society.


4ad1aa  No.11965547

>>11965268

Yawn. Sorry, torpedo, but it’s not going to work on us.


a8a1d4  No.11965655

>>11964967

Kay, I'll bite

>Basically, this is a containment thread,

of course. Do you want "THIS IS ALLOWE D TO STAY UP BUT X WAS LOCKED" everywhere? That just pisses everyone off.

>99% of the population isn't going to even bother trying to read this clusterfuck of a thread

Noone's supposed to, it's cycling for that reason. Only the most recent posts are important.

>The only value in a thread like this would be if you were required to respond to us at a given interval

Well he wrote that CM specifically instructed them not to. Write him that that needs to change. I agree that it's a stupid rule for mods to never communicate. And mods can't see who's behind a proxy either.

>No they weren't. They were your sycophants and you found that 'good'.

People not constantly crying about how any random mod is kikey was bad? Just because people disagree with you doesn't make it bad.

>Which you will and do ignore outright.

Not replying =/= not reading and considering. I've personally seen someone write a report for a thread here actual reports are short and the requested action was taken. Yes I know it's just one example.

>The rules are shit, designed specifically to facilitate shilling. We have no idea who any of chucklefucks are

Again, that not up to the mods who are, as polvol2 wrote, extremely restricted. We would need CM to change them and see what the mods do. Of course they are shit, hardly anyone disagrees. The problem is finding the point where it doesn't become kampfy/pol/ yet and imo that is essentially giving us a regular BO tat we trust isn't a fucking retard, but acts on his own. Fell free to suggest something. And if you think anyone will dox themselves you're a fucking retard.

>Which you still espouse completely.

Again, they're forced to.

>we have ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to trust that they have OUR best interest or the board's best interest at heart.

Will never happen. What do you want, a voice message swearing on whatever holy object that they want to help us? Just by their moderation there will ALWAYS be someone bitching, if not downright trying to craft a narrative.

Take the sam hyde video about adult swim for instance, there have been multiple bans saying that should go to the existing thread about adult swim. But no, it gets reposted and the crying that the topic is being censored goes on and on. We had the same thing before with the guy posting touching_wall,jpg and shopped a dick onto the wall. Everyone told him to fuck off, he got dozens of bans stating gay porn as the reason, several bans said he just needs to stop posting dicks. But no, be keeps on doing it crying that you can't criticize trump. Willing to bet it's the same faggot and he's not from here.

In fact, do read the board log. Not all right now, just the updates. Read the ban messages, actively report and see what action is taken. It tells you a great deal.

If not, do give examples on where the mods work against /pol/ that aren't explained with rule #2 for mods.

>You do the exact same thing.

Where are they mocking? From the messages I read they just eventually give up on ban evaders. kikey used to give a public ban message among the lines of "OP IS A COCKSUCKIG FAGGOT" and post their post history.

>Its still destroying 8/pol/, in fact, it may well be worse, […]

Board culture didn't form because someone banned some opinions. CM said in the OP that it's upon us to keep things in check, including the shilling aspect. I fully agree that the rules need some additions (leftist shit and people posting about 8gag/pol can fuck off, that'd be a big improvement already) but again and again, the mods evidently can't do shit about them so it's pointless to use this against them.


a8a1d4  No.11965658

>you're basically saying here "we've taken a soft hand on demoralization shilling and other assorted emotional-response trigger shilling techniques", and why the fuck would you do that?

I think he's saying that they're removing some of it instead of keeping it up under the "opinion" rule. In theory, that stuff should fly under the current rules.

>What? Did you actually just try to pull a "Hitler likes water, do you like water?" on me you son of a bitch?

He's saying that banning everything is sight is stupid and some shitposting is fine. Remember, they can see an IPs post history so they can tell when someone is just throwing out a shitpost or not. Hence all the "all posts are shitposts" bans.

Also bans are fucking useless, there is no difference between 10min and permanent ones. You get to write a ban message and they need a moment to switch the VPN/reset the router.

>Good. I don't know why you'd think that amounts to something even worthy of stating

Everyone complains about cancer running free and he told you why they're not doing anything. Yes, it shouldn't need stating, it's been in the largely only pinned OP for months, but seemingly it does.

>Thats a strawman - its one thing to delete everything you don't like to see, its another to NOT delete TONS of things that are very obviously put there simply BECAUSE the people who browse /pol/ won't like to see it.

Been over this, shit rules by CM, can't blame mods

>And does that, perhaps, lead to you moderators, jumping around various IPs, claiming to be a bunch of users, and stirring up frake shit about good moderation? I'm 99% certain it does, because I've seen what amounts to proof of such in this very thread.

<Everyone who disagrees with me is a shill

So can anyone being against the moderation. In the end, no one knows and even if everyone including me is actually one of the mods, what exactly does it change about the points being made?

>No one can reply? What the fuck sort of fucked up ruleset behind the scenes do you have in place?

<"Finally, you haven't seen mods talk about this shit much… for a reason. I understand fully why CM wanted it this way"

This says CM told them to not write shit. The guy even fucking agrees that it's a shit rule.

>especially now that this thread is a revolving 700+ post thread that most people can't be assed to sort through.

Cycling. We're likely well over 3000 by now, most deleted. As I said, the older posts are largely irrelevant.

>You haven't told us shit in this post, except that you think anyone with a brain trusts you.

he told you exactly why things are as they are. What do you want? How to you want this trust to build?

>Rule fucking 5. What's the deal? How do we even get a fucking response out of you on these topics when you, apparently, arent 'allowed' to converse with us?

Just how obvious does it have to be that the only one making rules is the site administrator?

The last one who pissed off CM was kikey so i doubt they'll go against him and make their own rules.


a8a1d4  No.11965660

>Kikey never did leave, and I wouldn't be surprised if you're him.

Ah yes, of course. He just magically managed to control himself after a spergout spanning years and him banning the admit, cracking his beloved tripcode and shitposting with it where all just a ruse set up to make some people think he was booted but wasn't, a ruse done for entirely no reason. I never get that shit. Plus, not it's polvol2 who's kikey? It was polvol1 before that with some undelyable proof, initially it was polvol3, same situation.

>The other day I got banned, for FUCKING 3 DAYS

So you're admitting ban evasion. Good job.

>for a few posts in a thread, requesting you fucks no longer make shill threads and posting the board log link… And guess what? You let that shill thread sit for about 20 fucking hours, then you bumplocked it, banned nobody BUT ME - despite the thread being full of anti-White bait posting, the thread ITSELF being anti-white baitposting - AND deleted all my posts… Not just those 4-5 in the thread, ALL MY FUCKING POSTS, there being far more than enough for you to have been able to tell that was a bad fucking call on your behalf, burning a field of good content because of a few bugs (which you likely introduced indirectly).

I can't say anything here because if they deleted everything they went by your post history. Since that is gone now too we'll never know and I sure as hell am not taking your word on it alone. But as I read the board log and most "deleted all posts by IP" come right after bans such as "mass spam everywhere" I guess you went and shat everything up because you didn't like posting it here. Hey, my word against yours.

>YOU DONT SAY.

>And I'm sure the moderators neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeever utilize these tactics that we now have every reason to think they're aware of and utilize, right? Of coursh.

He's being neutral, as he should be. And why would they need to, they can actually ban people when they see them doing shit instead of trying to be jews about it.

>Well then, LETS ADJUST THAT, shall we?

not their thing, cm, ect.

>Here's a suggest. You're accountable? Okay, tell me whats up with this rule change suggestion.

>Which means you faggots aren't engage the population.

He told you he's not allowed to. The rule is good and we can discuss it here, but ultimately, since CM only made a single post here in months and that was when 4chan was down, we'll need to tell him directly. I doubt that he's reading this thread.

>AS A MODERATOR (not via a fucking proxy or tor)

I disagree. Even if they don't post here or in any other thread, them not using proxy/tor still says something about them, even if it's "I didn't post here as a normal user". They should only ever use those to flat out state "we're only posting this as neutral mods and nothing else, if I'm not a (1) I'm just sharing this VPN".

And if not, as mentioned anyone can change their IP within minutes. You did so yourself when ban evading. So no point.

Remember, they're presumably regular users that got recruited by CM. They still post as such here.


000000  No.11965751

>>11965547

Who is (((us)))? Because you're essentially the only retard on this entire board who is pro-kikestianity.

And shouldn't you be wearing your little (((hall monitor))) badge, faggot?


01464a  No.11966093

>>11965751

Judaism and Christianity are fundamentally different.

>Christianity does not stand opposed to the jew

Atheism does not stand opposed to the Jew


d6052a  No.11967541

>>11964874

This is absolutely wrong. Anyone who looks into the JIDF knows they protect christianity online. That's always perplexed people. Care to wonder why?

>>11965547

Hey mod, could you try answering him honestly instead of disregarding what he's saying because he is using TOR, something you were using here to try and TORpost >>11961833 ?

Is the reason why you won't is because you can't give a legitimate response? Because you can't risk proper discussion or you'd otherwise be exposed for being wrong? You basically sunk to the level of JIDF. Congratulations.

This is one of our moderators. Anyone feeling their almonds activated?


cf112d  No.11968202

>>11965547

t.

REPORTED FOR INTL


4ad1aa  No.11968429

>>11967541

>Anyone who looks into the JIDF knows they protect christianity online.

Anon, please.

>disregarding what he’s saying because he is using TOR

Sorry, I should’ve been more clear. Not because he’s using tor, but because he’s ban evading FROM tor. Would you were that we give the time of day to someone who whines about, say, his thread in support of homosexuality being deleted as shilling?

>because you can’t give a legitimate response?

Not at all. There is simply prerequisite knowledge required to post here. Everyone knows that. What do we say, anon? Lurk more. We don’t have to retread the same ground every single motherfucking day. We can’t make any progress like that. Why should we put up with the same spam threads every single day? We have >>>/polarchive/ to handle that.

>Because you can’t risk proper discussion or you’d otherwise be exposed for being wrong?

If you saw a thread where OP asks for proof that the holocaust didn’t happen, and then the thread got deleted, would you think that moderators believe it happened, or would you think that the OP should have lurked more instead of asking something he should have already known before posting?


d6052a  No.11970074

>>11968429

>>Anyone who looks into the JIDF knows they protect christianity online.

>Anon, please.

Sorry, was that you dodging the point?

>Sorry, I should’ve been more clear. Not because he’s using tor, but because he’s ban evading FROM tor.

How do you know this? Because right now it seems like you're simply evading the points raised and you want to disregard them based off of implied faults. The other person in this thread on your side subjected all points to the contrary as spam threads when it's way closer to being the opposite case than anything else.

>Would you were that we give the time of day to someone who whines about, say, his thread in support of homosexuality being deleted as shilling?

But that isn't the case here. The case is your dismissive attitude and baseless assumptions in regards to a side of an issue. You can wave a hypothetical context around but that is irrelevant because it centers around a different topic with the outcome you want.

>Not at all. There is simply prerequisite knowledge required to post here. Everyone knows that. What do we say, anon? Lurk more. We don’t have to retread the same ground every single motherfucking day. We can’t make any progress like that. Why should we put up with the same spam threads every single day? We have >>>/polarchive/ to handle that.

We still have warranted & important holocaust exposing threads every other week even though the first thread on /polarchive/ is a holocaust exposing thread. See my point? You're trying to dismiss this issue as if it's already answered, but it isn't. Holocaust exposing is the bread & butter of /pol/, but your side on christianity isn't.

But now that you bring up /polarchive/, I feel the need to point this out. Even though it's a wonderful board, how did the pro-christianity thread on there get to the top of the first page even though its last time-stamped post is 10/07/16 with 13 posts? Even the Sweden thread below it is more recently bumped with last post being from yesterday. Are you also the admin of /polarchive/? How would you handle someone starting a thread on Redpills on Christianity being Jewish Subversion? Would you delete on sight or redirect to >>>/polpolarchive/ and consider the "discussion" invalid and a case of lurk moar?

>If you saw a thread where OP asks for proof that the holocaust didn’t happen, and then the thread got deleted, would you think that moderators believe it happened, or would you think that the OP should have lurked more instead of asking something he should have already known before posting?

Again, you're trying to use a loaded hypothetical as a basis for an argument where it doesn't apply. You're implying the christian question has already been answered when it hasn't. For a topic as important and thoroughly ingrained in both jewish and european history and ironically sparse on /polarchive/ and biased towards one side, it's clear that this discussion isn't remotely far from over and you wish it to be over and be pro-christian as de facto per this board.

We deserve better mods if this is the best you can come up with. Please don't nuke /polarchive/ as retaliation. You're clearly not suited for this.


e1cf79  No.11970300

>>11970074

>incinuating the kikes support Christianity

Kike is short for kikel, the yid word for Circle. Illiterate immigrant kikes couldnt sign their name, amd refused to make an x because it looked too much like a cross.

Kikes are responsible for killing the Christmas season

Kikes spread degenerate anti Christian values and press for atheism

Kikes killed Russian Christians by the millions.

You are full of shit.


4ad1aa  No.11970396

File: 4758fa93aeaec46⋯.jpg (180.42 KB, 1242x1516, 621:758, the image of which I'm rem….jpg)

>>11970074

>Sorry, was that you dodging the point?

Ignoring the lie. “That which is presented without evidence…” etc.

>How do you know this?

I’m reminded of an image.

>You’re trying to dismiss this issue as if it’s already answered, but it isn't.

Of course it is, and so is the holocaust. Are you seriously suggesting the jewish claims of the holocaust are so much as up for debate?

>Even though it’s a wonderful board, how did the pro-christianity thread on there get to the top of the first page even though its last time-stamped post is 10/07/16 with 13 posts?

I went to go link it directly (to make sure it was even there), but the thread was still 404’d from the April 1 hack of… god, two years ago now, huh? The fix requires a simple post edit or thread post from mod tools, so I did that and then deleted the post in question. I have no idea why the thread didn’t go back to its regular position afterward, though it should have. Probably has to do with the way the hack fucked up the site. Please feel free to add anything to relevant threads (or create one if you don’t see a topic) over there.

>How would you handle someone starting a thread on Redpills on Christianity being Jewish Subversion?

If it’s fact, it stays up. /polarchive/ is a place to aggregate what we know to be objectively true. I would love for it to be used so we don’t have to keep dealing with the same shills HERE, every fucking day.

>Christianity being Jewish Subversion

I’ll repeat to start a new topic, mentioning that this is a lie. Content on the jewish subversion OF Christianity, on the other hand, would be well appreciated. There’s absolutely no denying the factuality of that.

>You’re implying the christian question has already been answered when it hasn’t.

Of course it has. Have you read the new testament? I’m sure you already know that jews aren’t allowed to do that, so why might THAT be?

>ironically sparse on /polarchive/

Please add anything truthful that you find, and on any topic. I find myself running to /polarchive/ thinking, “Don't we have a thread on… no we don’t…” more often than I’d like.

>biased towards one side

Truth inherently ignores all “sides” but its own. There’s nothing true about the jewish holocaust narrative. You’d call that “biased to one side” if (since) we only have /pol/ack content there.

>We deserve better mods if this is the best you can come up with. You’re clearly not suited for this.

You’re clearly unacquainted with Christianity. That’s all there is to this. It’s not something to be angry about and not something to hold grudges over. You don’t have to become a Christian, and surely you ‘'shouldn’t'' become a zionist-that-calls-himself-christian (which, buried in all of this, IS your primary point of concern–the subversion OF Christianity). But you should go at least skim the New Testament (hell, just hit the common pro-Christian copy pastas we see here) and see just what Jesus said about the jews. Plenty of non-Christians see the value in Christianity (against other religions or secular degeneracy, say), and there are even non-Christian /pol/acks who well know the value of Christianity in fighting the jew, specifically.

>Please don’t nuke /polarchive/ as retaliation.

I BO’d /polarchive/ months ago to protect it from imkikey. I scooped it up out of sheer terror that he would get it (since it was on the claims board) and WIPE it and replace it with pictures of the MSNBC dyke whose name I won’t even bother repeating, like he had originally squatted /spaceelevator/. Don’t worry.


122210  No.11970408

Fucking ban that wandering anti-American kike shill for the love of god. Nobody buys that he's actually a euro.


122210  No.11970456

https://sys.8ch.net/log.php?page=1&board=pol

>vol2 revokes ban vol3 enacted for "low quality bait"

Seems to be too many cooks in the kitchen.


945760  No.11971491

File: 72add11ffcde2dd⋯.jpg (409.48 KB, 1450x966, 725:483, Donald Trump Chabad Lubavi….jpg)

File: 70fe7426fb40928⋯.jpg (639.19 KB, 2000x2163, 2000:2163, Donald Trump M.I.C. S.O.C.….jpg)

File: 0f27cba03a10073⋯.jpg (753.69 KB, 2048x1364, 512:341, Donald Trump U.S. Military….jpg)

TRUST THE PLAN


43e247  No.11971536

why is it impossible make a new thread for fucks sake


bd5007  No.11971943

d6052a here, flushed DNS earlier

>>11970300

>Kike is short for kikel, the yid word for Circle. Illiterate immigrant kikes couldnt sign their name, amd refused to make an x because it looked too much like a cross.

Wow, those specific kikes chose to do that in that way. I wonder why all kikes don't blank out an X like they do the o in God: G_d? Maybe it's because that point is invalid and asinine to use.

>Kikes are responsible for killing the Christmas season

Last time I checked people still celebrate christmas. Or perhaps you mean your specific version of the christmas season? By the way, whatever happened to yuletide? I've noticed in the past the yuletide-christmas topic is quite the conundrum on /christian/.

>Kikes spread degenerate anti Christian values and press for atheism

Kikes own both sides, the play both sides. They push for one and frame the conflict as one or the other so that you fall into either trap. See: False Dichotomy

>Kikes killed Russian Christians by the millions.

Were they russian before they were christian or were they christian before they were russian? Choose wisely.

>You are full of shit.

The irony is that you believe those points are valid enough on their own.


bd5007  No.11971947

1/2

>>11970396

>Ignoring the lie. “That which is presented without evidence…” etc.

You're illustrating how little you're aware of JIDF activities. Their involvement in christian discussion has always baffled people especially when people remind otherd that jews don't play both sides and then pretend they don't on certain topics. You're welcome to claim subversion as an excuse but that doesn't automatically disqualify the fact that the JIDF protects christianity.

>I’m reminded of an image.

You're further illustrating your bias and what you feel is allowed on this board.

>Of course it is, and so is the holocaust. Are you seriously suggesting the jewish claims of the holocaust are so much as up for debate?

Are you really this desperate that you have to twist my words? You're selectively quoting what I'm saying to frame your response directed to one thing and remove context. This is what I wrote:

We still have warranted & important holocaust exposing threads every other week even though the first thread on /polarchive/ is a holocaust exposing thread. See my point? You're trying to dismiss this issue as if it's already answered, but it isn't. Holocaust exposing is the bread & butter of /pol/, but your side on christianity isn't.

I underlined the most important part that you intentionally omitted a response to. You're overtly trying to cover up for the fact that your personal bias, being pro-christianity, is the answer to the christian question. You are so desperate that you have to twist my words and frame the situation as if I would entertain jewish myths on the holocaust taken as fact and then sidestep how you believe the christian question is answered by your pro-christian bias.

>I went to go link it directly (to make sure it was even there), but the thread was still 404’d from the April 1 hack of… god, two years ago now, huh? The fix requires a simple post edit or thread post from mod tools, so I did that and then deleted the post in question. I have no idea why the thread didn’t go back to its regular position afterward, though it should have.

It just so happened to be there that way when you linked the board. Pure coincidence. I believe every time.

>Probably has to do with the way the hack fucked up the site.

The way it fucked up a long time ago?

>Please feel free to add anything to relevant threads (or create one if you don’t see a topic) over there.

Except:

>If it’s fact, it stays up.

"Facts" that you approve.

>/polarchive/ is a place to aggregate what we know to be objectively true. I would love for it to be used so we don’t have to keep dealing with the same shills HERE, every fucking day.

Which shills are those? I'm curious as to how you would describe them after posturing to be moderate on the christian question but in reality only accept your beliefs.

>>Christianity being Jewish Subversion

>I’ll repeat to start a new topic, mentioning that this is a lie.

See, this is how you are outing yourself as ill equipped to moderate. Not just on this issue. You yourself are unfit to moderate this board. You automatically dismiss this topic. Combined with your bias, your dismissive attitude, your faux-moderate stance, complete with dishonesty in your replies - this is wholly detrimental to this board and limits the scope of what /pol/ is allowed to question.

>Content on the jewish subversion OF Christianity, on the other hand, would be well appreciated. There’s absolutely no denying the factuality of that.

And here we have it. You by your own admission will not allow people to question if christianity was jewish subversion all along, let people present their evidence for or against it and develop their own conclusions, but you will allow a tangentially related topic that as a prerequisite insists that the nature of christianity didn't come from from jewish influence but was eventually subverted later to be used by jews. Those are two different things. One skips past the other. You will not allow the discussion of the former so you can force everyone to accept a narrative that is in line with your own belief that you want others to take as fact.

>Of course it has. Have you read the new testament? I’m sure you already know that jews aren’t allowed to do that, so why might THAT be?

The way you wrote your response equates your personal bias towards pro-christianity as embodied by the new testament itself. That surely isn't what you meant but I couldn't help but point that out. Aside from that, you're stepping into delusional territory if you seriously believe the new testament by default magically bestows and proves christianity isn't jewish subversion and was later subverted by jews. That is how far the leap in logic was illustrated by your response. The new testament doesn't magically win the discussion. Reading it from an objective lens, it is moreso anti-roman propaganda than anything else.


bd5007  No.11971948

>>11970396

2/2

>>ironically sparse on /polarchive/

>Please add anything truthful that you find, and on any topic.

Except what you don't like.

>I find myself running to /polarchive/ thinking, “Don't we have a thread on… no we don’t…” more often than I’d like.

I wonder if it's because other /pol/lacks got a glimpse at how biased you were and steered clear.

>>biased towards one side

>Truth inherently ignores all “sides” but its own.

Your personal bias does not qualify as truth.

>There’s nothing true about the jewish holocaust narrative. You’d call that “biased to one side” if (since) we only have /pol/ack content there.

Citing your own twist of my words, or indulging in your delusion? I'm not sure at this point.

>You’re clearly unacquainted with Christianity.

You like many others always make this same determination, that a critic of christianity that chooses to examine it to determine if it is jewish subversion from its inception, isn't "acquainted" with christianity simply because they don't automatically agree with you.

>That’s all there is to this.

By your own admission that is your deliberate intent to be shortsighted.

>It’s not something to be angry about and not something to hold grudges over. You don’t have to become a Christian, and surely you ‘'shouldn’t'' become a zionist-that-calls-himself-christian (which, buried in all of this, IS your primary point of concern–the subversion OF Christianity). But you should go at least skim the New Testament (hell, just hit the common pro-Christian copy pastas we see here) and see just what Jesus said about the jews.

Protip: Jesus only didn't like the saduccees and pharisees. Two sects of jewish religions, a real enemy of the jews who came to fulfill their prophecies? Those pro-christian copypastas and even the dishonest attempts to use hitler's words are far removed from their original context, are borne from interpretation to suit your personal views, and are thus invalid. Even minor attempts to critique them are met with hostility. This is why open discussion is needed and allowed, not a narrow field that is one-sided like you would like.

>Plenty of non-Christians see the value in Christianity (against other religions or secular degeneracy, say), and there are even non-Christian /pol/acks who well know the value of Christianity in fighting the jew, specifically.

That doesn't automatically make christianity inherently good. Even by that sentiment alone, that is the same as taking christianity as a lesser of evils. It doesn't make it good.

>I BO’d /polarchive/ months ago to protect it from imkikey. I scooped it up out of sheer terror that he would get it (since it was on the claims board) and WIPE it and replace it with pictures of the MSNBC dyke whose name I won’t even bother repeating, like he had originally squatted /spaceelevator/. Don’t worry.

So someone who is delusional and openly biased and dishonest to the point of naming your own personal beliefs as truth claimed /polarchive/ to protect it from kikey. This is what is known as irony.


bd5007  No.11971981

>>11971947

>Their involvement in christian discussion has always baffled people especially when people remind otherd that jews don't play both sides and then pretend they don't on certain topics. You're welcome to claim subversion as an excuse but that doesn't automatically disqualify the fact that the JIDF protects christianity.

Meant to say:

Their involvement in christian discussion has always baffled people especially when people remind others that jews play both sides and then pretend they don't on certain topics. You're welcome to claim subversion as an excuse but that doesn't automatically disqualify the fact that the JIDF protects christianity.

> You're overtly trying to cover up for the fact that your personal bias, being pro-christianity, is the answer to the christian question.

Meant to say:

You're overtly trying to cover up for the fact that you want your personal bias, being pro-christianity, to be the answer to the christian question.

Getting my negatives backwards tonight. See you tomorrow around noon, pro-christian "moderator." And feel free to take typos and other errors out of context if you have to.


6843b6  No.11972699

File: b43a9e5424c623c⋯.jpg (13.21 KB, 403x348, 403:348, 965.jpg)

>>11847248

The commies have proven again and again that they will not play by the rules they make everyone else follow.

No amount of "stahp the curcule jurk" concern trolling will convince me that we can ever afford to give these faggots an inch. At this point in my life, I've seen far too much ground lost because we keep playing by the rules while they just run circles around us as we yell "cheaters", only to have the media back them up, every single time.

8chan pol is absolutely much more autistic and much more prone to purity spiraling retardation than 4cuck. It's so bad sometimes that I don't wonder if this board isn't just infested with larping leftypol users. However, it has its uses and I'd rather see it stay like it is than open the gates to the very people who have consistently destroyed nations, destroyed promising tech, destroyed valuable culture, and want to see me and my children dead.

I'll side with the autistic 8chan guys on this before I ever cede another inch to the commies.


cf112d  No.11972712

>>11972699

>purity spiraling

>pinokike meme

>>>/trs/


6843b6  No.11972766

>>11970396

>Of course it has. Have you read the new testament? I’m sure you already know that jews aren’t allowed to do that, so why might THAT be?

Jews aren't allowed to write "God" either. Their stupid rabbinic religion is full of all manner of autistic retardation. This proves nothing. They just know that the average Christian views Jews favorably and that the average Christian supports them.

>You’re clearly unacquainted with Christianity. That’s all there is to this. It’s not something to be angry about and not something to hold grudges over. You don’t have to become a Christian, and surely you ‘'shouldn’t'' become a zionist-that-calls-himself-christian (which, buried in all of this, IS your primary point of concern–the subversion OF Christianity). But you should go at least skim the New Testament (hell, just hit the common pro-Christian copy pastas we see here) and see just what Jesus said about the jews. Plenty of non-Christians see the value in Christianity (against other religions or secular degeneracy, say), and there are even non-Christian /pol/acks who well know the value of Christianity in fighting the jew, specifically.

Christianity is the only religion which has allowed kikes to gain control. No other place on earth is as kiked as the Christian nations of the world. That fact alone speaks volumes.

Your Xtian bias is just filthy. You really REALLY should not be a mod here. No wonder all the anti Christian threads get pruned and/or nuked.

Also, you'd be surprised at how many here have actually read the Bible. I actually reread the gospels recently, specifically trying to glean what Christ wants from his followers, no amount of apologism can convince me that it's not a religion of death, one where its followers are encouraged to give up on this life and to look forward to death.

There's always value in old historical stories and texts, but that doesn't mean one supports them as a way to live their life, let alone as a system of existence. Hell, even Garfield comics have value sometimes, but that doesn't mean shit. You take the shit that makes sense and throw the rest out, you don't take those rare instances of value and accept everything else because Christ had the bright idea that you should pull the plank from your own eye before helping your neighbor remove a splinter from theirs.


6843b6  No.11972802

>>11972712

I've never visited TRS you stupid faggot. That kike lover can be strung up like the rest of them for all I care.


4ad1aa  No.11973532

File: 1e395ab1e09cceb⋯.png (14.69 KB, 142x234, 71:117, Screen Shot 2018-08-07 at ….png)

File: b3bcf65a823c26e⋯.png (30 KB, 611x213, 611:213, marxism.PNG)

>>11971536

Are you getting a site error or a 503? Or something else?

>>11971943

>Maybe it’s because that point is invalid and asinine to use.

They literally have their own plus sign for math because they’re terrified of drawing a cross.

>the JIDF protects christianity.

Abject nonsense. They protect their subversion of Christian doctrine, not the doctrine itself.

>You’re further illustrating your bias

With that image? Hardly.

>you intentionally omitted a response to

Not at all. Indeed, I’ll respond now: it is. Certainly not as much as the holocaust, which is our cornerstone. But to suggest that Christianity is not an enemy of the jew is laughable to the point of shilling. And we’re not doing an “enemy of enemy is friend” thing here, either. Christianity is a moral code that has shaped Western civilization (otherwise known as civilization) for millennia. What it calls people to do socially and behaviorally is what jews have undone, first and foremost, in their subversion. This is, of course, not at all to say that other ideological bases don’t have similar social and behavioral codes. It’s to say that jews subverted Christianity for a reason.

>It just so happened to be there that way when you linked the board.

Not sure what was confusing. I told you why it was there.

>”Facts” that you approve.

ANYthing on /polarchive/ that isn’t fact, please report. Since the report is limited to 100 characters, also post why it isn’t fact in the thread, linking to the post.

>Which shills are those?

You’re kidding, right? Errant leftypol raids on any topic, shitposting niggers who hate whites, the fag that uses tor to post “white nationalism is white genocide,” and more. Hopefully your lack of belief in their existence is simply testament to the mods’ ability to get rid of them with expediency… and not just you posting subversion for its own sake.

>posturing to be moderate on the christian question but in reality only accept your beliefs.

/pol/ stands for truth. “Be moderate” is not what truth is. Your mischaracterization tells me you’ve not read most of the above.

>you’re unfit

>i say so

>watch as I refuse to prove any of my claims because my feelings got hurt

Anon.

>You automatically dismiss this topic.

No. I “dismiss” it in the same way that I dismiss someone whining about the holocaust. If you were posting in exactly the same way, but you were whining that “the moderation is unfit because they don’t allow threads where people post in favor of the holocaust happening,” I’d say the same thing. There’s a reason I keep going back to this example, and it’s a reason you’ve failed to understand about three or four times now. Truth isn’t a matter of opinion or belief. We know what christianity is. We know what it has done for civilization. We know that jews subvert christianity, because they don’t like what it is. We know the ways in which jews subvert christianity. We know what behaviors, proffered by “christians” are actually jewish subversion. And so if we, here, stand opposed to jews and jewish behavior… why would we entertain that subversion? Imagine someone coming here and saying, “Hollywood isn’t jewish. Look at all the goy writers and producers and even directors. There’s no jewish subversion of media; it’s just that way naturally.”

CTND


4ad1aa  No.11973539

>>11973532

CTND

>You by your own admission will not allow people to question if christianity was jewish subversion all along

Question it all you like. The question is just answered. Are you fucking nuts? Nowhere did I say you can’t question things. Where would we be otherwise? “Is two plus two four?” “Yes, and here’s why.” “Yeah, but is it really four?” “Sure, here’s another way to look at it.” “No, seriously, is it four?” Why should /pol/ retread old ground? Every. fucking. day. Don’t tell me you didn’t see it under kikey; we still see it now, for heaven’s sake. We’re so used to it now that people often don’t even report it because they don’t figure it will be taken care of.

>That is how far the leap in logic was illustrated by your response.

It’s not, but hey. If you want to believe something that jews aren’t allowed to read is jewish, go right ahead. If you want to believe that someone the jews say is boiling in hell in his own shit is pro-jewish, go right ahead. You’re just wrong.

>The new testament doesn’t magically win the discussion.

Thanks for asserting something that no one questioned. It was one example. You’ve surely seen /pol/’s aggregation of jewish documents that espouse anti-christian beliefs before; feel free to pick any of those, too.

>>11971948

>I wonder if it’s because other /pol/lacks got a glimpse at how biased you were and steered clear.

Probably not, since we’ve never had an official link to the board anywhere on /pol/ and kikey didn’t have control over it, so few people even know it exists. Hell, the original BO abandoned it for long enough that it went up on claims. Then again, he probably left around the time that kikey took power and started wiping anything he didn’t like.

>I’m not sure at this point.

Literacy is helpful to comprehension. If the analogy was faulty, please explain how.

>that a critic of christianity that chooses to examine it to determine if it is jewish subversion from its inception, isn’t “acquainted" with christianity simply because they don't automatically agree with you

No, I’ve not made this determination. Actual study of Christianity shows that it is not subversion in and of itself, just as actual study of the holocaust shows that the narrative is not true. We want people to study both. Truth doesn’t fear investigation. There is nothing covered that shall not be revealed. I’ll go ahead and use the analogy again. “a critic of [holocaust denial] that chooses to examine it to determine if it is [covering up a real genocide] from its inception, isn’t “acquainted” with [holocaust denial] simply because they don’t automatically agree with [/pol/].

I really don’t like procedural argumentative bullshit like this, but I acknowledge that’s a personal preference borne of my life’s recent history and I’ll keep engaging you in this regard if you like. I’d just rather people post citations if they have them. If you can’t cite your shit, why should it be entertained? That’s a pretty /pol/ish belief.

>Those pro-christian copypastas and even the dishonest attempts to use hitler’s words are far removed from their original context,

I repeat my statement re: /polarchive/.

>That doesn’t automatically make christianity inherently good.

I don’t recall saying that.

>delusional and openly biased and dishonest

>This is what is known as irony.

It’s not, since you’re just wrong in this instance.

>naming your own personal beliefs as truth

<“You only say ‘the truth is that holocaust didn’t happen’ because you don’t believe the holocaust happened!”

Try again, but this time read what has been written.

CTND


4ad1aa  No.11973540

>>11973539

CTND

>>11971981

Thanks for the clarifications, but I probably got your gist anyway.

>jews play both sides and then pretend they don’t on certain topics.

Absolutely correct in both halves of the statement.

>the JIDF protects christianity.

Absolutely wrong. They protect their subversion of Christianity and claim that it is true while denouncing anything that isn’t subverted.

>the fact that your personal bias… …is the answer

>the fact that you want your personal bias… …to be the answer

That’s a pretty big error, but I commend you for going back and clarifying. A lot of people wouldn’t. It’s still wrong–what I want is irrelevant; what IS is relevant.

>>11972699

>The commies have proven again and again that they will not play by the rules they make everyone else follow.

Absolutely true. I have a screencap from /tg/ on that very thing. See second image.

>prone to purity spiraling

This is not a thing. You’re using leftist phrases to describe right-wing thought. NEVER accept your enemies’ dialectic, anon. “Purity spiraling” is code for “telling the truth, always, and not ever telling lies.” Why would we NOT do that?

>I’ll side with the autistic 8chan guys on this before I ever cede another inch to the commies.

So… you now openly admit to supporting the very thing you just denounced (“purity spiraling”). That’s confusing.

>>11972766

>They just know that the average Christian views Jews favorably and that the average Christian supports them.

You can be a zionist or a Christian. You can’t be both. That’s the subversion we’ve been talking about before. Look up Cyrus Scofield for more. I don’t want to just do a data dump here and break the train.


b55796  No.11973553

>>11973540

Are you the moderator from end/pol/ who uses the handle "Adolf Hitler"? You have a very similar writing style and very similar false ideas.


4ad1aa  No.11973565

File: 98ef084e6067c6c⋯.png (292.34 KB, 721x1004, 721:1004, Shabbath 116a.png)

File: bbf13d575624781⋯.png (277.54 KB, 692x1072, 173:268, Sanhedrin 90a.png)

>>11973538

>Except for the millions of Christian Jews and millions of curious non-Christian Jews.

When you make up things that don’t exist, how is that a response? Never mind that the statement is codified at least twice in jewish law.

>>11973553

Nope. What’s false about what I’ve said? Prove me wrong and I’ll never say such lies again.


b55796  No.11973571

>>11973565

>What’s false about what I’ve said?

Pretty much every single thing you've said about Christianity.


cf112d  No.11973703

>>11973571

No, he is the butthurt Christian from the (now deleted) pierce thread.


cf112d  No.11973709

>>11973703

*its still in the catalog, on pg 10


000000  No.11975846


bd5007  No.11977947

1/4 - bd5007 here - I flush my DNS daily and so should you

>>11973532

>They literally have their own plus sign for math because they’re terrified of drawing a cross.

So that prevents them from using + signs and X's anywhere else? Again, asinine.

>Abject nonsense. They protect their subversion of Christian doctrine, not the doctrine itself.

There's two things at least wrong with that. The first being the implication that christianity wasn't jewish subversion to begin with, a topic you won't entertain. The second being a question of which christian doctrine you're referring to.

>>You’re further illustrating your bias

>With that image? Hardly.

The way you further illustrated your bias was by a complete show of how you treat detractors. You were using what happened to elon musk to evade and to not give a proper answer.

>>you intentionally omitted a response to

>Not at all. Indeed, I’ll respond now: it is.

Denial & admittance. Very nice.

>Certainly not as much as the holocaust, which is our cornerstone. But to suggest that Christianity is not an enemy of the jew is laughable to the point of shilling.

To not allow /pol/ to explore all possible forms of jewish influence which includes christianity is incriminating to the point of shilling.

>And we’re not doing an “enemy of enemy is friend” thing here, either. Christianity is a moral code that has shaped Western civilization (otherwise known as civilization) for millennia.

You're repeating another fallacy most christian posters exhibit which is to pretend that christianity provided a moral code to follow and pretend that without it whites would no possess morality.

>What it calls people to do socially and behaviorally is what jews have undone, first and foremost, in their subversion. This is, of course, not at all to say that other ideological bases don’t have similar social and behavioral codes. It’s to say that jews subverted Christianity for a reason.

I held off on asking because of the hole you were digging yourself into but I'll ask now. When and how, did jews subvert christianity? Since you repeatedly claimed to know the answer to the christian question, you should be able to directly answer this and in addition, be able to explain why you and many other christians on /pol/ cannot decide on a specific point in time when it started.

>>It just so happened to be there that way when you linked the board.

>Not sure what was confusing. I told you why it was there.

It's completely obvious that you bumped the thread when you linked it above as if it was evident that your biased take on the christian question was already set in stone. You're using /polarchive/ as your personal canon instead of what it should be used for.

>>”Facts” that you approve.

>ANYthing on /polarchive/ that isn’t fact, please report. Since the report is limited to 100 characters, also post why it isn’t fact in the thread, linking to the post.

Evading the point again. You're not even going to address why you're being accused of being biased.

>>Which shills are those?

>You’re kidding, right? Errant leftypol raids on any topic, shitposting niggers who hate whites, the fag that uses tor to post “white nationalism is white genocide,” and more. Hopefully your lack of belief in their existence is simply testament to the mods’ ability to get rid of them with expediency…

I didn't indicate I didn't believe in the existence of shills or such shills. But I thank you again for demonstrating how dishonest you are, for implying as you did. Your faux-shock & surprise is blatant.

> and not just you posting subversion for its own sake.

What do you mean by this? In between our exchanges you have demonstrated you only accept your side on the christian question but in reference to /polarchive/ you pretend to be moderate and accepting. See what happens when you go back and forth on your tones? It doesn't work. You can keep cutting pieces of my reply out to frame what I'm saying but you will eventually slip up and your bias is all that's left.


bd5007  No.11977950

2/4 - oh cool it kept my ID

>>11973532

>/pol/ stands for truth. “Be moderate” is not what truth is. Your mischaracterization tells me you’ve not read most of the above.

You've repeatedly said you will not accept discussion of christianity to determine if it is jewish subversion or not. You even equated it to how holohoax exposure is already set in stone.

>>you’re unfit

>>i say so

>>watch as I refuse to prove any of my claims because my feelings got hurt

>Anon.

Talking to yourself again? I suppose it is much easier than giving an honest response.

>>You automatically dismiss this topic.

>No. I “dismiss” it in the same way that I dismiss someone whining about the holocaust.

Again, equating the two so as to posture as if your side is automatically right.

>If you were posting in exactly the same way, but you were whining that “the moderation is unfit because they don’t allow threads where people post in favor of the holocaust happening,” I’d say the same thing.

Except that's not what we're talking about.

>There’s a reason I keep going back to this example, and it’s a reason you’ve failed to understand about three or four times now.

More precisely, you keep digging yourself into a bigger hole.

>Truth isn’t a matter of opinion or belief. We know what christianity is. We know what it has done for civilization. We know that jews subvert christianity, because they don’t like what it is. We know the ways in which jews subvert christianity. We know what behaviors, proffered by “christians” are actually jewish subversion. And so if we, here, stand opposed to jews and jewish behavior… why would we entertain that subversion? Imagine someone coming here and saying, “Hollywood isn’t jewish. Look at all the goy writers and producers and even directors. There’s no jewish subversion of media; it’s just that way naturally.”

Your delusion is as asinine as you believing jews won't write or type Xs when it's convenient as a defense of christianity. Moreso, everytime you include others as, "We," you really meant just yourself. You're pretending your manifesto there is the truth because you don't want /pol/ to explore christianity from an objective and redpilled perspective. That's the real problem here.


bd5007  No.11977958

3/5 - sadly the body is too long and gotta split posts again

>>11973539

>Question it all you like. The question is just answered.

So which is it?

>Are you fucking nuts? Nowhere did I say you can’t question things.

Things? I specifically said, "to question if christianity was jewisg subversion all along." Your previous reply was you equating it to questioning what /pol/ says about exposing the holocaust. Now you're pretending to soften up your tone and muddying up the context.

>Where would we be otherwise? “Is two plus two four?” “Yes, and here’s why.” “Yeah, but is it really four?” “Sure, here’s another way to look at it.” “No, seriously, is it four?” Why should /pol/ retread old ground? Every. fucking. day. Don’t tell me you didn’t see it under kikey; we still see it now, for heaven’s sake. We’re so used to it now that people often don’t even report it because they don’t figure it will be taken care of.

Pitiful. You were trying to have a point there but it reeks of desperation. You retread old ground to prime newfags.

>>That is how far the leap in logic was illustrated by your response.

>It’s not, but hey. If you want to believe something that jews aren’t allowed to read is jewish, go right ahead. If you want to believe that someone the jews say is boiling in hell in his own shit is pro-jewish, go right ahead. You’re just wrong.

I'm curious. Where did you hear that jews can't read the new testament? This is especially strange because jews wrote it.

>>The new testament doesn’t magically win the discussion.

>Thanks for asserting something that no one questioned. It was one example. You’ve surely seen /pol/’s aggregation of jewish documents that espouse anti-christian beliefs before; feel free to pick any of those, too.

Have you tried not using the new testament as a win-the-argument card? Because that's the reason why I mentioned that. Why would you do something you yourself are dismissive about?

>Probably not, since we’ve never had an official link to the board anywhere on /pol/ and kikey didn’t have control over it, so few people even know it exists. Hell, the original BO abandoned it for long enough that it went up on claims. Then again, he probably left around the time that kikey took power and started wiping anything he didn’t like.

We're talking about you, though.

>>I’m not sure at this point.

>Literacy is helpful to comprehension. If the analogy was faulty, please explain how.

You didn't provide an analogy. You're desperately backtracking after being caught equating questioning christianity as questioning holocaust exposure. Nice job.

>>that a critic of christianity that chooses to examine it to determine if it is jewish subversion from its inception, isn’t “acquainted" with christianity simply because they don't automatically agree with you

>No, I’ve not made this determination. Actual study of Christianity shows that it is not subversion in and of itself,

You keep going back and forth on this. You disapprove of "retreading old grounds," then say that questioning christianity is allowed but pointless, then saying it isn't because it's important that people believe jews "fear" it.

>just as actual study of the holocaust shows that the narrative is not true.

Well then there shouldn't be a problem if /pol/ has a dedicated thread to actually studying christianity to see if it was jewish subversion or not.

>We want people to study both. Truth doesn’t fear investigation.

Except you will only accept one answer, your answer to the christian question. You keep pretending to be open about it but you've repeatedly stated that it's as cemented and canon as exposing the holocaust.


bd5007  No.11977960

4/5, hopefully

>>11973539

> There is nothing covered that shall not be revealed. I’ll go ahead and use the analogy again. “a critic of [holocaust denial] that chooses to examine it to determine if it is [covering up a real genocide] from its inception, isn’t “acquainted” with [holocaust denial] simply because they don’t automatically agree with [/pol/].

Your original analogy was equating holocaust exposure to denying that christianity is jewish subversion. Nice backtrack.

>I really don’t like procedural argumentative bullshit like this, but I acknowledge that’s a personal preference borne of my life’s recent history and I’ll keep engaging you in this regard if you like. I’d just rather people post citations if they have them. If you can’t cite your shit, why should it be entertained? That’s a pretty /pol/ish belief.

So is exploring all possibilities of jewish subversion. Hey, wouldn't it be weird if christianity was actually jewish subversion since its inception? Can't question that on 8/pol/. polvol2 says not to.

>>Those pro-christian copypastas and even the dishonest attempts to use hitler’s words are far removed from their original context,

>I repeat my statement re: /polarchive/.

You just got done denying you plug anything as if it's self-evident. If you're going back to that that fast, you are absolutely desperate.

>>That doesn’t automatically make christianity inherently good.

>I don’t recall saying that.

You not only have, you believe it as you've repeatedly demonstrated.

>>delusional and openly biased and dishonest

>>This is what is known as irony.

>It’s not, since you’re just wrong in this instance.

This is coming from the guy that's openly evasive and cuts lines to frame responses to a misconstrued context.

>>naming your own personal beliefs as truth

><“You only say ‘the truth is that holocaust didn’t happen’ because you don’t believe the holocaust happened!”

>Try again, but this time read what has been written.

False equivalence, again. Want to know how holocaust exposure became a, "cornerstone" of /pol/ as you put it? Because despite all of the shills, people kept on questioning it and refuting the myths. You refuse to admit, even though your back and forth tone keeps letting it slip out, that you don't want people questioning christianity and you equate that to, "posting subversion."


bd5007  No.11977965

5/5, have a good night or good morning, whatever timezone you're in

>>11973540

>Thanks for the clarifications, but I probably got your gist anyway.

>>jews play both sides and then pretend they don’t on certain topics.

>Absolutely correct in both halves of the statement.

Okay. So you accept that but won't accept even the slightest possibility that JIDF defends christianity - and to play both sides they defend and attack it. Awaiting your denial.

>>the JIDF protects christianity.

>Absolutely wrong. They protect their subversion of Christianity and claim that it is true while denouncing anything that isn’t subverted.

I look forward to you explaining that in your followup response. Feel free to use an excuse akin to, "but this is meta, not a redpill thread," because it's likely you will.

>>the fact that your personal bias… …is the answer

>>the fact that you want your personal bias… …to be the answer

>That’s a pretty big error, but I commend you for going back and clarifying. A lot of people wouldn’t.

Negatives and double negatives are common after a long day at work.

>It’s still wrong–what I want is irrelevant; what IS is relevant.

Yeah. You've said it repeatedly. You acknowledge what /pol/ is but you are selective when it comes to christianity because you believe that proverbial book is closed and all is done and said. Thus, you don't want anyone analyzing it to confirm it for jewish subversion. If you know you are absolutely right, why are you afraid of /pol/ analyzing it to ensure it's not jewish subversion? /pol/ has a lot of smart guys who don't fall for jewish tricks. Surely they can help make sure you and others don't worship jews. That would be ironic if you did.


6843b6  No.11978909

>>11973540

>purity spirialing

Yeah, it's a thing. It's not a leftist critique either, it's a genuine term to describe a genuine activity that takes place. As for me not making sense or me contradicting myself, I just think you're shit at reading. You're the kind of autistic retardation that makes being here a chore. I feel like I'm at the old hobby shop I used to frequent as a teen when guys like you entirely fail to understand what I wrote and the intent behind it, while simultaneously making arguments that don't line up with the topic being discussed.

If I must spell it out for you, I'm talking about the purity spiraling faggots who insist everyone else isn't perfect enough. That everyone is a CIA agent or that if you're not 100% Bavarian phenotype you're not white.

>subversion of Christianity

Jesus you're a faggot. I hate that you're a fucking mod. Christianity IS subversion. At least Islam doesn't encourage its followers to surrender their violence and aggression.

Whites became a world power in spite of Christianity, not because of it.

Christians love to take credit for all the good shit whites have done, but it was a small miracle and a testament to whites being held back by Christianity that whites managed to conquer the world.

You know the nigger problem we have in the USA? We have that problem, unlike Islam countries exactly because Christianity told them castrating slaves is bad. Islam had no qualms about that however. Now, thanks to cucktianity we have a whole class of subhumans living in our country and they're being used by kikes (who most Christians tacitly support) against whites.

Regardless, I'll give you guys the credit that you're all vastly better than what we had before. So for now, I guess the only suggestion I can offer here is that you need to accept that you have an obvious bias with the Christian question. So given that, realize that you have this bias and fucking stop pruning and deleting anything that is remotely anti Christian. Otherwise you're as bad as the kikes you claim to hate.


6843b6  No.11978938

File: ea3d921d302e01f⋯.png (204.35 KB, 1018x763, 1018:763, 1525935298276.png)

>>11977965

Good work anon. I neither have the time, the patience, nor the energy at this time in my life to argue as effectively and as accurately as you have this entire thread.


a8a1d4  No.11978958

>>11978172

Cause we're not pedos?

>>11977965

>Okay. So you accept that but won't accept even the slightest possibility that JIDF defends christianity - and to play both sides they defend and attack it.

To be fair, this applies to anything. I think trump is a kikepuppet and those personality cult that has formed is the most dangerous thing to happen to /pol/, which is also largely the reason I support the current moderation over the less shilled-to-death coonfy/pol/. They don't ban you for saying that if you don't add dickpics to your posts.

Point being, no matter what side on whatever argument you take, the JIDF has, is or will take that same point.


ab7cd7  No.11980011

>>11848332

I always find it funny when random faggots act like they know someone else's ideology from a non-revealing post. You have (54) posts you dumb nigger. Take a break and kill yourself while you're out.


760333  No.11980856

>>11622450

Why did you fucking delete the project pelican thread? Are you really that much of a faggot? Or is it because that nigger Obama was in office when it was authorized and you somehow can't stop fantasizing about sucking and fucking that monkey cock?


b56f3c  No.11981300

Someones bot is going nuts


e56ddf  No.11981333

>>11962631

>>11962388

>moderator makes up lies that are disproven and moderates horribly inconsistently

We really are stuck with the same fucking crew as before, aren't we?

DAILY REMINDER

>>11953924 "SPAM 4CHAN" is considered a perfectly acceptable thread worthy of being left up and untouched but "/pol/ information being spread in public to a wide audience" is considered "eceleb" and must be banned.


4ad1aa  No.11981443

>>11978958

>no matter what side on whatever argument you take, the JIDF has, is or will take that same point.

Bingo. We shouldn't frame our beliefs as a mere counterpoint to our enemies' (claimed) beliefs. Truth is truth, no matter where it's from.

>>11977947

>Again, asinine.

So asinine, in fact, it's a wonder you think we'll fall for such a strawman.

>the implication that christianity wasn't jewish subversion to begin with, a topic you won't entertain

Have historically entertained, rejected as falsehood. You're claiming that /pol/ must be forced to entertain the idea that the holocaust happened. Every. single. day.

>You were using what happened to elon musk to evade and to not give a proper answer.

I gave the answer. I evaded nothing. Sorry if it was unclear.

>Denial & admittance.

<you denied by not denying

<you admitted by not admitting

See, these are the worst kind of trolls. The ones that pretend to be legit.

>To not allow /pol/ to explore all possible forms of jewish influence

This has nothing to do with allowance, any more than it has anything to do with "allowance" of pro-holocaust threads. You're either soft-trolling or you've been redpilled so long that you've forgotten how people GET redpilled–their own research. People aren't going to accept something that upends their entire worldview if it's shoved down their throat. They will, however, if they come to it on their own terms.

Is /pol/ a place for newfags? Raw, fresh newfags, that is–straight up bluepills. Should we want them posting here without having lurked? Should their questions be entertained, regardless of topic, every time they're asked? That's sort of the crux of your argument here.

>pretend that christianity provided a moral code to follow

Implying it doesn't?

>pretend that without it whites would no possess morality.

No, I said nor implied no such thing. I directly refuted that claim, in fact. See: >>11973532

<This is, of course, not at all to say that other ideological bases don’t have similar social and behavioral codes.

>When and how, did jews subvert christianity?

Repeatedly, through the years, and both procedurally and doctrinally. You've surely heard of Cyrus Scofield, as well as Vatican II. Those are the most relevant for the modern era. But many popes during the dark ages and renaissance were (((suspiciously))) lenient on the jews and heretical in their bulls.

>You're using /polarchive/ as your personal canon

You still have no evidence for this claim. Again: post fact on /polarchive/, in the sort of form you'd see an archive of things.

>You're not even going to address why you're being accused of being biased.

That's literally every post thus far.

>faux shock and surprise

A little effort, please. You're being pretty obvious.

>side

You keep talking about sides. I take it you reject the concept of objective truth, then?

>See what happens when you go back and forth on your tones? It doesn't work.

I'm just seeing bloviating from you. I'm not changing tone at all.


4ad1aa  No.11981507

>>11977950

>You've repeatedly said you will not accept discussion of christianity to determine if it is jewish subversion or not.

For the same reason that /pol/ has no obligation to accept discussion of the holocaust to claim that it happened.

You'll refuse to believe this, as you have everything else posted here, but one of the rule requests submitted to CM regarded whether /pol/ should accept religion threads here at all, in any form. Whether the rules should say, "yes, we acknowledge the subversion and hatred of non-jewish religions by jews, but the discussions of how said religions threaten the jews should be directed to their respective boards."

>I suppose it is much easier than giving an honest response.

"I don't like the responses, therefore you're not being honest" is pretty kosher.

>equating the two so as to posture as if your side is automatically right.

No, telling you to lurk more, as you've clearly not done.

>Except that's not what we're talking about.

It is, conceptually. You continue to fail to understand this.

>More precisely, you keep digging yourself into a bigger hole.

Five times now.

>Your delusion is as asinine

So you have no refutation to the statement?

>as you believing jews won't write or type Xs when it's convenient as a defense of christianity.

Except "when it's convenient" isn't ever in defense of Christianity; it's to subvert it. Or perhaps you think that jews don't lie habitually? Why can't you reconcile your claims with the contents of the Talmud?

>you don't want /pol/ to explore christianity from an objective and redpilled perspective

Nonsense.

>So which is it?

Both. Insert "You must have an IQ >110 to post here" joke here.

>Now you're pretending to soften up your tone and muddying up the context.

If you can't understand an analogy between merely two things, I don't think anyone can help you.

>You retread old ground to prime newfags.

You tell them to lurk more. If you retread at all, it's to link them off-board to where they can learn more. Why should we be forced to go around in circles when we're the only site on the fucking Internet where we can have discussions about our beliefs without being banned or censored? We should be improving ourselves. You're used to kikeypol. Hell, everyone is. The board was just reddit-where-you-can-hate-jews for so long that it's still ingrained in people.

>Where did you hear that jews can't read the new testament?

The Talmud. Read it sometime.

>Have you tried not using the new testament as a win-the-argument card?

Never did that, so sure. You sure you're not related to Robert Mueller?

>You're desperately backtracking after being caught equating questioning christianity as questioning holocaust exposure

1. Nope, not "backtracking."

2. Nope, wasn't "caught" doing something that I keep doing, reaffirming that I'm doing, and questioning why you don't comprehend. This is your problem, not anyone else's.

>You keep going back and forth on this.

Just become literate, anon. I genuinely don't understand what your problem is. You don't have anything in the way of an argument and refuse to substantiate your claims. Why?

>Well then there shouldn't be a problem if /pol/ has a dedicated thread to actually studying christianity to see if it was jewish subversion or not.

So why do you think /pol/ is obligated to retread old ground every single day? You've been asked this before.

>Except you will only accept one answer

Yeah, the truth. That's what /pol/ is. Go whine about the holocaust somewhere else. We have no obligation to have "the holocaust happened" threads here. You have other boards for that.


4ad1aa  No.11981555

>>11977960

>Your original analogy was equating holocaust exposure to denying that christianity is jewish subversion.

Yes, that's what I said. Again.

>Nice backtrack.

Become literate. I repeated what I said. I won't bother doing it a third time, because your inability to read has shown your disingenuousness.

>wouldn't it be weird if christianity was actually jewish subversion since its inception

It would, since none of our experiential or physical evidence points to that.

>can't

>says

Nah, try again.

>You not only have

It stands opposed to the jew. If the jew is inherently and universally bad, anything which stands opposed to it is either good OR…? (fun fact: false dichotomies are a jew's bread and butter)

>This is coming from the guy

"In this instance" means "about this topic." If that was hard to understand… why was it?

>Because despite all of the shills, people kept on questioning it and refuting the myths.

So why should we be forced to continue doing that when we know it factually did not happen?

>You refuse to admit

Because it's not true.

>your back and forth tone

Which isn't, you're just apparently incapable of understanding how two ideas can exist without conflict.

>>11977965

>So you accept that but won't accept even the slightest possibility that JIDF defends christianity

Only because it isn't true.

>and to play both sides they defend and attack it.

Jews attack Christianity and defend their subversion of Christianity.

>I look forward to you explaining that in your followup response.

Uh… what's to explain? What confuses you about that statement?

>you are selective when it comes to christianity

No, I'd delete a "the holocaust happened" thread, too. Those get just as many reports as the "oy vey goyim da christcucks are evil jooz!" threads. I'll keep asking until you answer: Why should we be forced to retread old ground every single day? Why is /pol/ not allowed to have prerequisite knowledge, such that /pol/'s discussions may be based upon that knowledge, such that the discussions need not reiterate said knowledge, such that discussions continually reach a higher order of thought (and subsequently increase the requisite knowledge base)?

>why are you afraid

Because this is a strawman borne either of malice or your lack of understanding of what you've been repeatedly told over the course of days.


4ad1aa  No.11981580

File: d46a1962c868f60⋯.gif (8.92 KB, 363x323, 363:323, DarkAges.gif)

>>11978909

>it's a genuine term to describe a genuine activity that takes place

So "always telling the truth" is bad, then? Not demanding adherence to a set of beliefs (and thereafter not compromising said beliefs) is bad, then?

>That everyone is a CIA agent or that if you're not 100% Bavarian phenotype you're not white.

So you're trying to equate the reducto ad absurdum fallacy to the act of not compromising on fundamental beliefs? "Purity spiraling" is what the jews accuse a person of doing when they do the latter. Your example quoted above is simply the former.

>Christianity IS subversion.

Read the New Testament.

>whites being held back by Christianity

Is this one of your images, then?

>We have that problem, unlike Islam countries exactly because Christianity told them castrating slaves is bad.

Ignoring completely the assassination of Abraham Lincoln and the rise of the radical republicans who, instead of deporting all nonwhites, decided to give them "freedom" and let them stay here. And ignoring the jews who brought them here in the first place.

>Otherwise you're as bad as the kikes you claim to hate.

"You're as bad as jews if you delete jewish spam", huh?


ad211d  No.11981660

>>11981580

Fuck that graph and fuck you. What even is the vertical axis' unit of measure?


e56ddf  No.11981804

>flood of botspam both in reply and new thread forms appears

>moderation once again is faster to bumplock legitimate threads with shit excuses than they are to clean up ACTUAL problems

It's like we never had a vol/BO change after all.


122210  No.11981822

Why is nothing being done about the low effort slide threads littering the front page, that somehow seem to appear as soon as one of the adult swim pedo threads gets bumped?

You dont want to be complicit in such jewry do you?


ad211d  No.11981831

>>11981822

Why do you autists assume that you're entitled to spam other threads just because your pet topic isn't directly below the sticky?

This is a board. People can have more than one conversation at a time.


e56ddf  No.11981906

>>11981831

>obvious spam/slide threads are good goy, stop complaining!