[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / feel9k / fur / leftpol / mde / s8s / sw ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
Winner of the 75nd Attention-Hungry Games
/caco/ - Azarath Metrion Zinthos

March 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: e2356b7db6ab2c8⋯.jpg (17.25 KB, 650x284, 325:142, fn_f2000_1.jpg)

03dd73  No.11721699

Ever since gamergate started I've been seeing the misuse of the words "entitlement" and "toxic" as well. Each one with a specific accursed role, entitlement being used to disparrage consumer rights, and toxic being used to shame people for natural behaviors such as racial realism, and a firm belief in gender roles. Aside from creating artistic content to defy this and promoting artistic content that coincides with our ideals how do we fight this?

In my opinion though the biggest offender plus issue here is "entitlement" because entitlement means YOU ARE entitled to something due to a specific action, not that you have a false sense of self-worth.

48237e  No.11721905

File: 2f476e0a35889ac⋯.jpg (147.25 KB, 1274x1024, 637:512, 2f476e0a35889ac988c8ddebb0….jpg)


It's not so bad if you consider it as a way to instantly confirm the bias of the speaker/writer. Off the top of my head there are a few "key words" you can remember





Power Structures





This list is in no way exhaustive or complete, but you get the idea.

6b9772  No.11721911


Slippery Slope is another one

f18851  No.11721917

File: b62e348c0d14b71⋯.png (22.21 KB, 559x289, 559:289, Discrimination.png)

File: 30c7cc89af9027d⋯.jpg (118.23 KB, 739x562, 739:562, Bigot.JPG)

File: 6d05ca1263e3f8b⋯.jpg (60.16 KB, 1117x150, 1117:150, Nation.JPG)

File: 3c3f84b3af4cc5f⋯.jpg (68.51 KB, 1117x187, 1117:187, State.JPG)


>how do we fight this?

Avoid using the terms and language of the leftists

Admonish everyone who uses that language whenever they do

Create and use a different lexicon of common language

In more detail, you avoid using their language because the way you speak influences the way you think, and vice-versa. Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, and read Less Than Words Can Say for more on that phenomena. In a nutshell if you use their language its precepts and gestalt will creep into your own mind and poison it just as it poisons the minds of others. So don't ever say 'toxic' or 'problematic' or whatever else save to admonish and laugh at them. Plus you'll sound more impressive anyway.

Admonishing others for actually using that language in normal conversation is critical too. Leftists do this constantly, and what they are doing is attaching a sense of guilt to a word to make you stop using it, but more perniciously they are attaching guilt to the concept of those words. In the Northern Midwest, many people say 'guys' as a collective term for everyone in the general vicinity, but an intersectionalist will proclaim that to be 'gendered-language' that hurts tranny feelings and therefore you should say something different. This poisons all the positive feelings and associations associated with 'guys' as the socially-aware and cautious mind tries to reconcile a supposed social rejection with the in truth wholly acceptable word. It's extremely damaging in a subtle way to a people's way of life, and the counter is to make anyone who seriously says Leftist terminology, especially by mistake, feel like the moronic faggot they are being when they use that language. It's very important to do that because if people cannot use those terms, the ideas behind them begin to wither away. Leftists know this, therefore the rest of you ought to know it too.

Finally those on /pol/ need to utilize better words to convey ideas than those supplied by others. This doesn't mean making a secret clubhouse language though that is already done through inside jokes and memes, which is great for identifying fellow /pol/acks and therefore useful for RL associations, but utilizing and reclaiming terms that will carry notions and ideas in them by their very use. These terms can either be old words that have lost much of their use and social connotation Like the insult 'cuck', terms that have a useful connotation that can be loaded with more ideas and accentuation such as Nationalism, or even reclaiming words that are corrupted either from opposition or had a bad social connotation 'Fake News' is a great example of taking a weaponized word and turning it on your opposition. This specific lexicon building requires a good knowledge of the language and perhaps others, the creativity to find perfect words that just resonate with the idea they are trying to convey, and a testing ground for those terms like /pol/ to see if they are catchy enough. Without your own shared lexicon your ideas will be at the mercy of some other group's ideas, which will stifle your attempts to build your own framework as you try to build it out of the materials of the opposition.

"By curtailing frivolous and "fighting" words, the Party seeks to narrow the range of thought altogether, such that eventually, thoughtcrime will be literally impossible." -George Orwell, 1984

7a44b6  No.11721924


48237e  No.11721969

File: 90983d5d7d0a69d⋯.jpg (128.76 KB, 700x700, 1:1, 1520213448221.jpg)


Fun fact, slippery slope has been completely right about the entire path of the degeneration of the family values in America.

>Allowing blacks to marry whites

<If we let blacks marry whites, what's next letting gays get married?

>Allowing gays to marry

<If we let gays get married what's next, letting them adopt children..

Now we're dealing with transsexual children being celebrated.

There's more that it's been right with respect to, but it isn't always a fallacy.

03dd73  No.11722000


>Avoid using the terms and language of the leftists

As Orwell said though we can't let them hijack language, once they completely do, because by god they're trying, even talking about the color brown might be considered hateful. Maybe it's not so much avoiding these words, but refusing to use modern interpretations of them at all costs instead? But I guess that would mean engaging in sophistry and semantics if the faggot is belligerent enough to do so…

I honestly feel that due to Corporate PC culture intertwining so much with the government thanks to kikes we're reaching a crossroads with how we use language as a whole.

695716  No.11722073



George called out SJWs before it became a thing.

66fdec  No.11722083


>Women in the army

Why would you post this? Pretty ironic.

117097  No.11722113





f18851  No.11722130

File: 99c572a9918fc40⋯.jpg (75.93 KB, 603x582, 201:194, Pre and Post Modernism.jpg)

File: fb4ede6a994ae7c⋯.png (17.72 KB, 744x167, 744:167, Problematic.PNG)


>Maybe it's not so much avoiding these words, but refusing to use modern interpretations of them at all costs instead?

You either have to reclaim it in the minds of the masses with a more powerful idea, or you have to use a different word to bypass the ideas associated with it. Take 'problematic' for example. Problematic screams SJW faggotry due to the associations with it, and if you use it and say later, "I'm using it in its original Greek definition, not this modern way!" the people you communicated with still pinged the modern ideas of it and now attached them to you and whatever you were talking about. You lose the moment you utter it seriously.

You have to undermine those associations or twist them to your advantage if you want to reclaim that word, but frankly it's a piss-poor word anyway. It is grammatically weak, instead of saying this is a problem the thing is in itself the essence of a ideological problem. That subtle distinction is very important, because something being just a problem can be solved to that it no longer is a problem, but a 'problematic' thing, adjective-wise, cannot be solved because the nature of the thing is described to be a problem. So when I say your idea is problematic, I am saying your idea is irreconcilably bad and cannot be solved, only attacked and suppressed.

When a word has too much baggage, it's useful just to find something else for it. Edward Bernays wrote Propaganda in the 1920's in an attempt to reclaim the word's neutral if not positive associations after during WWI the term came to have sinister connotations. He failed, and instead restarted with a new term Public Relations to create his positive spin on Propaganda rather than try to fight against the tide of emotion and history with the former word.


Good summation. To be entitled to something requires that you have a right to something in the first place, a notion that Marxists find a root cause of all world evils. Because the possessions of all people just come about through random chance rather than valid merit in their minds, therefore you cannot legitimately lay claim to anything "You don't own nothing, goyim". Therefore they use Entitlement to tickle a notion of unfairness in the minds of most where it takes hold while pushing this idea of you not being able to own anything in the background.


I'd say all four pictures are indicative of slippery slopes. Women shouldn't be in combat unless you are dragging the bottom of the barrel of your fighters, or that particular woman has a rare aptitude for combat.

7fb141  No.11722141



Add equitable vs equal. The Constitution says all men are created equal, so of course the gibsmedat niggerfaggots need to go beyond equality of opportunity with """equality""" of outcome ie equity.

7fb141  No.11722149

File: 08d2944aa6eb597⋯.gif (86.89 KB, 350x198, 175:99, db517f366a67e7701cf6c58106….gif)


>s-shut it down

>don't discuss & circumvent our kike tactics goys

66fdec  No.11722155


>or that particular woman has a rare aptitude for combat.

This is the definition of slippery slope.

2783a2  No.11722183


jews can't into confucius


03dd73  No.11722185

03dd73  No.11722187


Did not meant to post that, I was just reading the post.

7fb141  No.11722207

File: a154a2d2cbff0d6⋯.png (147.85 KB, 1035x763, 1035:763, a154a2d2cbff0d6ea32a89ca02….png)


Think back to the language win of pro-life vs pro-choice. That set back the child sacrificing leftists 30+ years, because who's not pro life? Like >>11721917 says we have to refuse to use language that give leftists the upperhand, and reframe the issues with new and better language that give us the upperhand.

f18851  No.11722261

File: 7a7008a3f191456⋯.jpg (194.64 KB, 1117x613, 1117:613, Extermination.JPG)


>Think back to the language win of pro-life vs pro-choice.

That's a great example. I think part of the problem on /pol/ when it comes to constructing a lexicon is that /pol/acks tend to go for either abrasive terms to let out their extreme displeasure at certain ideas nigger faggot comes to mind or cling to terms that were great in different times in different contexts like the German use of propaganda itself, or a prior anon's use of historical extermination. Words are tools, and so while pejoratives are great for letting off steam and talking among the likeminded they tend to be offputting and too aggressive in the minds of the uninitiated.

The pro-life to counter pro-choice is brilliant in that it is a positive notion advocating for something of higher value than the opposition. The phrase itself justifies itself in a neat little idea package, and those are the kinds of tactical words /pol/ needs to package its ideas into for mass consumption. Not just the alarmist language of genocide or replacement which are good for what they do, but also positive terms to promote the ideas /pol/ and to counteract the corrupted notions of the Marxists.

7fb141  No.11722410


>Words are tools, and so while pejoratives are great for letting off steam and talking among the likeminded

One more good use of attack words is to defame, demoralize, and destroy the opposition. Agreed though that they aren't effective for pursuading normalfags.

>The pro-life to counter pro-choice is brilliant in that it is a positive notion advocating for something of higher value than the opposition. The phrase itself justifies itself in a neat little idea package, and those are the kinds of tactical words /pol/ needs to package its ideas into for mass consumption

Exactly right. The leftist commies attempt to portray what they are not, being self-inconsistent deranged liars, and ethical (because "moral" is a bad word to them) high-ground is what they always try to get. They know we have virtue so they try word games to try to steal it, because they know virtue appeals to the masses. There is a difference between attack and virtue language, with different applications, and we must master both.

09087b  No.11722442


Manslaughter = people-slaughter

Manipulation = peopulation

Lets take the negative words & change them as well

0f6582  No.11722591


Using softer language is extremely effective. You can get a lot of normalfags, especially women, to agree to virtually any NS policy in 15 minutes or less when you avoid using overly harsh language. The structure of what you say matters a lot, too. Not only can you sidestep the word "racist" by pointing out that it's just "anti-white" (probably the biggest win of all time for us), but using phrases and sentences to equivocate various things is effective (because muh equality). It's even more effective with those more desperate for it (i.e. cuckservatives). Equivocation can be combined with said sidestep at the same time, like Horus's classic "you're just saying that because I'm White. Anti-racism is just anti-white." Note the equivocation. Only people of higher worth want things segregated at this time. Lumpenprole do not.

It requires far too much discipline for the average idiot to separate ideas (which /pol/lacks are huge on, I have noticed).

Another good equivocation was the Trump phrase: "the Clintons are criminals." That's about as simple as it gets. A = B. And as we know, everyone tended to agree, and he won by a landslide. The enemy does it, too: "Richard Spencer is a rayciss literal not see!"

Another good note about language: conflicting ideas are armor piercers and good for knocking down the first layer of psychological defenses (i.e. hardened target). Example: "The Jews have literal Nazi Nuremberg Laws…in THEIR country." Notice how I would never use the N-word in any other context. That is a higher stakes, bolder move. The idea is to always put the opponent on the back foot if they are hostile. You should also set ideas up that way, even if you don't say any contradictions. This way, any opposition has to always wade upstream through a tangle of bullshit to argue with you–like they have to justify ethnonationalism and make the case for Hitler, or they have to look like a weak bitch who got told. Win/win.

831b2d  No.11722604

Spoken and written language are for supreme normalniggers. Why not develop your telepathy instead?

a72690  No.11722622

File: 4e0e00c7e05974f⋯.jpg (27.79 KB, 374x351, 374:351, 1341606599870.jpg)

English is basically pozzed at this point. Trying to argue the definition of words goes nowhere because (((leftists))) are so deeply embedded into academia that they inevitably invoke the "language is, like, subjective, man!" clause when confronted. Then they go and change definitions of words in dictionaries/etc to be able to come back and say "SEE ACTUALLY YOU'RE WRONG", completely reversing on the "language is subjective" standpoint. Best example would be "racism", although that was a made up word by trotsky anyway, it keeps shifting its goalposts.

The future of the English language is some garbage "fluid" structure that essentially relies on a sort of "wiki" style of dictionary, where anyone can add, edit, and make shit out of their ass. Thus, any semblance of structure and stability is lost, people retreat to their own small tribes of non-heritage, and phrases like "gibs me dat" are treated as acceptable and normal.

The only solution is to invent our own fucking language at this point.

a72690  No.11722646


Although, the next best thing would probably be just to make our own dictionary instead, giving a big "fuck you" to leftists and allowing us to have a language that isn't permanently fucked with "newspeak".

sage for samefag

22df34  No.11722838

>this bullshit again

Fuck off with your slides, kike.

f18851  No.11722914

File: 3d4be7fa50a0329⋯.jpg (69.37 KB, 1115x189, 1115:189, Agony.JPG)

File: b47c0c53b5070a7⋯.jpg (73.79 KB, 1111x222, 1111:222, Envy.JPG)

File: d0972b57d6cac3a⋯.jpg (35.85 KB, 1115x93, 1115:93, Jealousy.JPG)


The coupling strategy seems like it would be powerful. Basically introducing a desired concept with one that they cannot refute without tearing themselves down. There is potential for an entire workshop on debunking common arguments and sentiments using actual historical analogues that way. Cool idea along with the rest.


What you are describing are living languages in general. This has always been the case, because a living language has the connotations and meanings of its words shifting with colloquial understandings of them. One of the nastiest and dangerous things that Marxists do today is that they rely on their fake definitions and their target's unwitting acceptance of the colloquial definition.

Case in point: "We can agree that racism is bad, right?" Now to the average person, racism is being unjustly prejudicial towards someone else merely because of their race. This is bad to them because they've been drilled to think it is bad since they were children at this point and thus say, "Yeah, racism is bad." But they are doing two things: assuming that both people are talking about the same thing definition-wise, and assuming the person they are talking to is honest. Both of these are wrong assumptions when dealing with the Marxist. That person only asks the question in order to employ consistency on their target while purposefully switching out the colloquial, commonly-accept definition of the common word with their blighted Marxist-filth definitions. The moment you let them define the word for you and take a stance on it, you've lost. They'll berate you for being inconsistent if you try to say it isn't what you mean or that it is illogical because you've already agreed in an extremely (((tricky))) manner to their premise.

There's a reason why formal debates always begin with a funny ritual of saying that they will pull their definitions of words from some fixed source, because this bullshit is important. The way you counteract the garden-variety Marxist is just to ask them up front what they mean by that word. This often will set them off immediately because they are not used to people playing outside of their framework. In fact, most of them have not been trained to anticipate it. They first will say, "Of course you know what racism means! Don't play dumb," or, when you persist, try to slip on to the rest of their argument. If you keep questioning their definitions and immediately hammering how retarded they are and never, ever agreeing to any definition but what you can draw from OLD dictionaries since you're worried about corruptions in the language, you will have neutered one of the most potent weapons of these demoralized fuckers. If you get one that is smart enough to recover from it to actually get into their ideological frameworks, you'll have free rein to rip down their many flawed assumptions without them pulling a consistency compliance trap on you.

The only reason why a language gets turned into Newspeak is because the virtuous allow themselves and the common folk around them to use that flawed language. Teach yourself and them not to use it and instead use proper language and you un-poz the language. Get out of this mindset of retreat - it's defeatist bullshit and won't work anyway.

3f6e2e  No.11722968

The use of the altered language is not so much to attack you, and more to control their own mind. The things they say must be warped beyond recognition for them to be palatable to their own mind, otherwise their mind would reject the obvious nonsense they speak. This is also why they repeat themselves when confronted by their absurdities.

It's difficult to believe that everybody on campus is in danger of imminent rape. It's easy to believe the persistent problem of rape culture being prevalent on campus is caused by toxic masculinity deeply ingrained in western culture, and you sound smart while saying it. They reason it's easier to believe is because "the persistent problem of rape culture being prevalent on campus is caused by toxic masculinity deeply ingrained in western culture" is to be understood as "we're all going to get raped", but when challenged (by reality) will morph back into the actual words and so escape scrutiny. This use of language enables people to hold believes that are blatantly false.

857fcf  No.11723003

Don't teach your enemy to stop making mistakes. If you force them to not use the language then you make them harder not to identify. Let them continue to use it and then destroy them for doing so when it benefits you.

If you're arguing with one then make them define terms like problematic. Force them to explain things they cannot and they look stupid.

48237e  No.11723037

File: 3ad8d0dfbfc6e99⋯.jpg (212.99 KB, 1000x630, 100:63, 1528545971318.jpg)


Those women are fighting for their people. Not for attention. I would bet they are all right wing as well.

The picture was posted more to emphasize the stupidity of American's use of labels and language versus what real action and commitment looks like.

I also like posting pictures, pic unrelated.

a72690  No.11723054


I always ask people I'm arguing with what they mean by certain words they use, especially if they're the crux of their argument (again, using racism as an example). They almost always come up empty handed, or they become obsessed with arguing the semantics if I don't agree with their definition, and they refuse to move forward with conversation as a result. Usually this ends up in some kind of chimpout. Of course, I'm always sure to do this with onlookers, as it's pointless to do so one-on-one.

>Get out of this mindset of retreat - it's defeatist bullshit and won't work anyway.

Good point, the only way out of this hell is to plunge directly into it rather than try to run away from it.

Related to the subject at hand, I feel as though imageboard culture is responsible for some of the most prominent memes (which are the base form of language, anyway), not the least of which are particular words or phrases. Stuff like







all existing words that were radically changed in the minds of the masses, without them even knowing where it came from. Some of these were even intentional - others came about more naturally, but all the same, they're important weapons in the Meme Wars™. I mean, fuck, I've heard "cuck" used on regular TV.

857fcf  No.11723072


Those women are at a photo shoot where they larp as soldiers for the pictures to be taken.

Talk to people who have served with women. They're not soldiers, they're a ball and chain around another soldiers leg. All they do is cause problems and that's if they haven't got knocked up in boot camp.


4chan had defined online culture since it's inception. Even the term meme comes mostly from 4chan spreading it. It's debatable today how much image boards influence but they're still influencers to a degree.

19a73e  No.11723083



If you've studied NLP, you'll know certain words, like 'toxic' and 'clear' are actually a form of mind hack, to ready your brain to accept the marxist propaganda without question.

31f005  No.11723102


Youre right about their hold on academia. That's why these threads are so good. Regaining control of the language is very important especially at a time when just saying black or jew can cause reprimand. I think the academic word factory is extremely weak though. They have done a lot of their work in the dark, but their bullshit doesn't stand up long in the light.

19a73e  No.11723228


"My race is taught that masculinity means caring for intoxicated people. Others weren't, so what you call rape culture, which doesn't really exist, is actually intoxication culture. Let's talk about how alcohol is so ingrained in our culture."

t. has used this

6dd7ef  No.11725001

File: c9883a1dbde55e2⋯.png (14.4 KB, 439x494, 439:494, cognition.png)


I will just copy pasta my attempt at making a thread about this 2 weeks ago.

I'll engage the thread when I get back from the Opera tonight.

I've been doing research on memes and linguistics along with their psychology. I wish to advance here a framework with which we can "formalize" and begin consciously designing our operations against the judaic left and chandala untermensch.

First it is important to hold that language is a meme in the Dawkian sense, but a very superficial one used to exchange meaning and information. Although memes get their point across through the use of language, it is exactly that: a transfer medium. A meme works when it taps some subconscious circuit in the recipient that invokes a response of affirmation. The recipient must find truthfulness in the transmitted information for it to gain "meme" status. Otherwise it is just noise.

I have two things to propose here: creating our own language to help fight back against newspeak and the pathologization of everything healthy and good in the world it brings, and figuring out what deep subconscious resorts exist in the average White and tapping into those to activate the White racial collective subconscious by memeing it into an elevated state of alert.

For a while now traditional terms have been getting destroyed or replaced with their antithesis, I will name the family (with its disgusting variant "alternative family") as one of the terms under assault, and "immigration" as one of the terms that are an antithesis. The way in which modern politicians speak of "immigration" as something to be "limited" or "expanded" would be translated into a 2000 year old language, roughly given here in English, as "I wish to knowingly have our country's racial makeup undermined by bringing foreign invaders in with an annual quota". While cumbersome this is the "next step" in racial consciousness, naming the farce for what it is. Unfortunately the term "anti-immigrant", in context to a political figure or party, is shorter than the full sentence "this party's policy is to achieve the security of the native race", but whatever gain is made in its brevity is lost in how it pathologizes being against the invasion of your country. Anti is a prefix associated with negativity in people's minds and we must move away from it, consider the same thing with "homophobia". Ignoring the jewish meme "hurr you're scared of gays cuz you secretly love them lol", we need to advance our own term that disparages the "homonormative narrative" and establishes our own in its place. "Degenerate" is too general now and has lost its meaning in English, we need something that carries the same weight as "Entartet" does in German. Philosodomite might be a good start.

Another thing of note: Whites must be made aware that "humanity" ends where the White race ends. A lot of naive Whites expand humanity in a universal sense to every 10 toed nigger on the planet, and that is wrong. They do not see us as members of an abstract humanity, they see us (at best) as an enemy to be feared and left alone, or (at worst) as easy pickings to rape and pillage. The universality of words like "humanity", "individuality", "identity", etc must be destroyed. We must employ anti-semantic speech (i.e. being so clear and consciously reiterating ourselves twice over) in order to keep jews out.

6dd7ef  No.11725002



A note from biology: at the end of the day, making babies is what matters and not what a bunch of racial foreigners (jews or niggers) call you. The language game (inferior to the meme game both in importance and weight it carries) is here to manipulate worldviews, both by awareing Whites and scaring kikes.

The second part is probably more difficult because it is difficult to articulate that which we understand to be true on a deep level. A good approximation would be to describe my feelings reading esotericism, the first 100 pages of Evola don't make any fucking sense, but after the first 1000 you'll come around to what is going on in his head. Unfortunately our best means of distributing knowledge to just hammer someone with a worldview until they "get it". There are intermediate steps to take of course, but the brain likes to "click" as it comes to a new conclusion and shows basically no progress before the click as it just busily assimilates information and tries to make sense of it. Whites are susceptible to memeing by empiricism, as that is what helped us survive the winter, so the appeal to parsimony, i.e. that the simplest explanation is the best, is a valid approach here. Why bother with 5000 pages of frankfurt school nonsense when 10 pages of Darwinism and applied laws of nature provide a superior account of racial divergent evolution?

Sorry for the longpost but its something that has been bothering me for weeks now and I needed to bring it to word, I can flesh out whatever point you like and I feel like the board is ready for discussing and conjuring Aryan magic now that kampfy got gassed.

265ef7  No.11725034


The term meme may have been popularised in popculture by 4chan, but it was in no way invented there. The term was coined by Richard Dawkins, he meant the word meme to rhyme with gene.

64a146  No.11725059

everyone needs to read baudrillard

555b78  No.11725142





555b78  No.11725143


teach your kids

6b7e06  No.11733575


Have a (you) for this incredible effortpost.

also bumping thread

d9bc56  No.11733616


>The only solution is to invent our own fucking language at this point.

That's so fucking stupid I really don't know where to begin

Please think before you post

c23f47  No.11733800


There's not much we can do to help serious cases of cuckoldery, they're too dependant on the System to want any change. When the System collapses they'll either adapt to become racists, or die in a sea of rioting niggers. I use "toxic" to refer to sodomites because of their toxic AIDS

0f56cf  No.11733848

File: 0e4c60f335c6473⋯.webm (11.1 MB, 480x360, 4:3, FIMIF_SAS_DAD.webm)


whats with the boat, OP?

d9bc56  No.11733967


>The term meme may have been popularised in popculture by 4chan

that's exactly what he said mate

0c5be3  No.11734064


Why euros like bullpups so damn much ?

88da9b  No.11734432

File: c283516f696fa01⋯.jpg (10.47 KB, 217x208, 217:208, 9fefd7bab32b700d5658e74bed….jpg)



Thanks for the engagement and thoughts. It honestly may not be entirely necessary to spend much time dissecting the technical aspects of why memes work so much as just observing what ones have worked on various levels and what psychological angles are the most effective at that. There are a few common themes observed about most 'viral' memes:

>Emotionally active, usually humorous

>Simple conceptually

>Useful for expression

>Open to spontaneous modification

>Visually distinct

>Easily transmittable

So language works the same way. Most words have some kind of emotional tone to it [spoiler]probably related to the idea of masculine/feminine words in Romantic languages[spoiler], have a linguistic charm to them, can be easily transmitted without losing or warping meaning too much, and they have a utility. Take the relatively new insults of "Cuck" and "Soyboy". They caught on precisely because it encapsulated ideas of repulsive non-masculine behavior, appearance, and morality in a simple, short, almost onomatopoeic terms. They're perfect for insults because they're satisfying to say yet encapsulate a complex idea into a memorable, 'fitting' term. They were born just as all great memes are, in a soup of blunt communication and emotions and the true test of how many people shared the terms.

Anyway, I hate getting stuck in abstractions. Lets take some of these word lists >>11721905 and >>11723054 have provided us and study these words in particular:

Leftist Terminology





>Power Structures







/pol/ack Terminology










Dissecting these like a linguist would, Leftist language is complex, multi-syllabic, referential to particular theories, and often adjective/adverbs. This gives it an air of intellectual superiority and the grammatical properties allow the user to attach those ideas to literally everything, which is exactly what it is designed to do. The overwrought nature of these words appeal to those who fancy themselves smart, and more importantly to appear smart to those they communicate with. This is further heightened by the grammatical nature of it that lets them attach different ideas together grammatically even if they don't make sense in reality. That serves the function of being able to label anything for denigration and destruction while appearing to have the authority of elevated intellect, which Leftists do constantly.

Contrast that with the /pol/ack language which is much simpler, generally negative, symbolic, and has a distinct auditory sharpness. This is great for quick communications of complex ideas and insults, which is exactly what you would expect to see develop on a visually restricted board full of anonymous faggotry. The complex ideas born of many observations and debate are tightly packaged by the /pol/ack into an almost poetic term because of the pressure to communicate fast. Superficially the language is low-minded, and often is picked up by morons because of the graspable nature of it and the high utility it provides for communications.

The language of the Leftist is an intellectual model from big ol' books from big-brained (((theorists))) and other legitimately intelligent people who rely on their listener's intellect to communicate. That naturally cuts down the audience to a smaller number, and mainly those of a moderately elevated intellect that think themselves smarter than they really are. However the /pol/ack's language is a traditional model that remains accessible to everyone while providing deeper insights to those who are capable and willing to explore it. I think that's the key model that should guide the development of the /pol/ish lexicon: Simple words to communicate easily observable truths and expose the bullshit constructions of all ideologies that prop up falsehoods.

This thread needs more /pol/ terms aside from just the insults. They constitute great tools for debate and dismissal, but it is difficult to build a positive notion with such caustic terms. One particularly powerful idea to encapsulate would be that notion of marrying the idea of nation with the idea of family, as it remains a powerful emotional and truthful argument against almost every (((effort))) against society today, from why to reject multiculturalism to cuckish tolerance.

4a1e93  No.11734492

File: 369d9bdca44e4eb⋯.jpeg (38.88 KB, 1024x1011, 1024:1011, 369d9bdca44e4ebdf537284c9….jpeg)


You forgot Kike.

88da9b  No.11734563

File: 1f1e8b019f915cd⋯.jpg (345.51 KB, 2121x1353, 707:451, 72140d1207d685d5a16b675894….jpg)


Jeez, good catch. A /pol/ without Kike in the vocabulary is not a /pol/ at all!

7fb141  No.11734691

The establishment but especially satanist leftists abduct children, keep them in cages, rape, and torture them to death. So what do they do in classic projection form? Say anything short of open borders is locking children in cages. They murder babies with abortion, so what do they do? Say anything short of open borders is ripping children from families. Note their inversion projection, but also the graphic language they use. They are used to emotionally traumatizing children they torture to death, so they get off on it.

6b7e06  No.11735489


>almost onomatopoeic terms

Ooga booga is another great example.

Anyway, you didn't happen to have taken a literature course? Where did you learn this stuff?

>grammatical properties allow the user to attach those ideas to literally everything

niggerish, niggerized, gay, faggy, cucky, and degenerate all work for us in that same way. I see what you're saying, its a bullshit word they can shoehorn in everywhere, so we need an analog. I propose "judaicized" to fulfill that role from our side. I've been seeing the term "negro-ization" also beginning to take hold. Unfortunately the left played the language game first, allowing them to hijack terms so we have to resort to neologisms ("ethnostate" is probably the best example here), and as you said, when you speak your own language the language inform the thoughts. We have to build those words that someone would snap at and say "that's exactly what I was looking for!" when referring to rooted concepts of manhood and womanhood or the racial nation.

>This thread needs more /pol/ terms aside from just the insults.

>marrying nation and family

We have to either reclaim "nation" and "family" or replace it. Nation has been superseded in a sense by "ethnostate", and for family or marriage we have to create a new term that captures the original concept: the nuclear, married for life, union of a man and a woman in service of their children and race. The building blocks of a nation you could say. In German I could conjure up the compound word *Volkseinheiten* which translates to "people-units" in this context. Maybe we should just excavate old French words for this sort of stuff, but just find something to contain the whole paragraph I've wasted here as a word in itself.

Some other terms in dire need of replacement are "migrant", "activist" or "professor".

For "migrant" I would propose invader (also as a replacement for "refugee"), and when we are talking about Whites moving, especially White South Africans that genuinely need refuge in the West, we call them "White brothers". The language needs to go back to us vs. them. We Whites against them niggers. "Activist" can be replaced by agent provocateur, subversive, or outright domestic terrorist depending on the context. If you wish to use these words, do it the way the Germans were in the 1930s when they started the organized re-Germanization of their language (where they gassed all Anglicisms and foreign words).

"These domestic terrorists (left wing 'activists') sighted at the Unite The Right rally…"

In German it would be:

>…an Hand der Erbkörperchen (Chromosome) erkennen wir dass dieses Wesen…

Where "Erbkörperchen" is a true German word for "chromosome", and in the () the author was guiding the reader towards what the 'old' (foreign) word was for that same concept. This was especially big in biology where a lot of stuff was borrowed and foreign.

Aggressively assert your worldview through your language. It forces the opposing party to be above an intelligence threshold necessary to actually hear and understand your terms. The inevitable IQ100 mass on our side will also be protected from pseudointellectuals in debates in their social circles, because those pseudointellectuals will not be able to handle our language and thus even though at an intellectual disadvantage, our supporter will find his viewpoint untouched and "undenied" in his social circle by parroting the loaded language we broadcast.

9fd06f  No.11735566



next you'll be telling me that wordfiltering nigger would be a bad idea

510507  No.11735571


Slippery slope isn't even a fallacy.

If something has a simillar beginning to something else, it likely has a similar outcome.

If you perform the same action twice you're bound to get the same reaction twice.

cd4d7e  No.11735731

My least favorite is that any left-wing heavy journalist will use the word "slam" even though no physical contact took place. An exchange of words is just that.

Another is when an alien fugitive is caught in my country, the media refers to them as an immigrant. That's a load of bullshit. Immigrants are people with legal status welcomed here. Illegal aliens are not immigrants.

Another one is using racism, where they intend to use discriminatory. Yes Muslims are discriminated against. We don't want rape, honor killings, or shariah law. However Islam is not a race of people. There are brown muslims, nigger muslims, and gook muslims. At least use words as intended. You don't need to dumb down the literate population.

Pathetic doesn't mean an ineffective argument. It means an appeal to emotion, rather than an appeal to reason, logic. Most of time when someone calls something pathetic, they themselves are making an appeal to emotion, often times directed to a logical statement they disagree with.

I'm not sure if it's demographic replacement lowering the IQ of journalists, or if they're intentionally misusing words.

88da9b  No.11735799

File: aca17b00de77646⋯.jpg (455.14 KB, 2000x997, 2000:997, The Stranger Rudyard Kipli….jpg)


>Where did you learn this stuff?

I'm a lurker on /pol/. There's lots of smart people here when you cut through the bullshit. Also reading on Sapir Whorf Hypothesis applications in 'Less Than Words Can Say' helps to clarify some examples of how grammar and sentence structure affects how people think. It's why it is vital NOT to use the Left's language when you communicate.

>niggerish, niggerized, gay, faggy, cucky, and degenerate all work for us in that same way.

Can't forget Semetic! But notice that the most common forms of the /pol/ language references an individual or group rather than an idea. The Leftist language can attach and decay ideas themselves, while the best the general lexicon here just describes the general nature of something in our opinion or references the speaker "OP is a faggot" or "This is a shit post". When going after an idea anons will keep the idea intact and describe why it is shit, instead of corrupting the idea itself like the Left does through a variety of ways. That should be turned in on itself to confuse and disable their use of language as one angle of attack, as is in fact what Leftists do to each other all the time.

>Nation has been superseded in a sense by "ethnostate"

Nation is a great word however with excellent foundations, and restoring it to its original meaning from the Latin 'natio' meaning a tribe or race would simply be a matter of tweaking one aspect of it rather than explaining what a new word is. Both can work though. New words have an advantage of being blank slates, but that means anyone can write in the emotional baggage to it.

>In German I could conjure up the compound word *Volkseinheiten* which translates to "people-units" in this context.

German is an excellent language for marrying concepts together. So is Latin, which I should train better in. Lucky for us English is an amalgamation of those two languages mainly.

>just find something to contain the whole paragraph I've wasted here as a word in itself.

That's the trick of it! /pol/'s hivemind and testing ground is the place to discover it though.

>Some other terms in dire need of replacement are "migrant", "activist" or "professor".

Proper insults to encapsulate them would be right up the alley of /pol/ I imagine. Remember rapeugees was a useful insult born on /pol/. I like the idea of getting those words which are used by the Left to twist certain ideas into a positive light and make them a subject of mockery.

>Aggressively assert your worldview through your language. It forces the opposing party to be above an intelligence threshold necessary to actually hear and understand your terms.

That's the way to do it. The terms shouldn't be arcane, but concepts like the Hedgehog Model. Simple terms that are defended from basically all threats and vectors of attack. The truth is always simple, and that's /pol/'s bread and butter. Notice that Leftists, when exasperated, demand that you read big 'ol books and that you'll understand then, or lamanet how 'uneducated' you are for not agreeing with them. That is their weakness. Their lies require a great confounding of thought to work, while truth requires just the right kind of illumination.


>next you'll be telling me that wordfiltering nigger would be a bad idea

It would be positively apocalyptic to certain Turkish individuals.


>the media refers to them as an immigrant. That's a load of bullshit.

Bullshit by design. A rose by any other name really wouldn't smell as sweet. The name in part becomes the thing, and vice-versa. That's why language is vital. As for wondering why they use those terms, they are crafted by public relations and marketing experts to have the preferred kind of responses. It isn't your imagination, they really are using manipulative language to change the way people perceive information.

As a side note, /pol/ should strive to make things of beauty too with language. Poetry today is rotten to the core and shit-tier, and it is a myth to believe that poets would only ever be political leftists. /pol/ has plenty who are or could be poets of higher caliber than what are available today. Doesn't have to be mushy either. The roman poet Martial (Marcus Valerius Martialis) wrote satire and insults that have survived for two millennia. I am reminded of "coughing fits, pants of shit" and other delightful turns of phrase…

6508af  No.11738461

File: a2df95b9547c098⋯.png (12.62 KB, 155x203, 155:203, ClipboardImage.png)


is pic related another good word candidate?

Coopting their language tricks against them?

>Can't forget Semetic!

No question. Do you have anything to say on the spellings semitic vs semetic? Which one is more explicitly anti-jew?

>can attach and decay ideas themselves

You're right that our diction is rather offensive and aggressive, designed to assault and tear down quickly instead of slowly corrupt from within, however that is the nature of our response: the creeping anti-white activity of the left has finally come to a head where we have to grab our bugspray daily to repel another attack. We are stuck fighting symptoms, or the push of the ants instead of burning the ant hill itself, instead of the root causes. I'm not convinced that we can conjure up language that will counter-corrupt them, this is more effectively done through false flag d&c exploiting their virtue signalling and ideological puritanism. I think its better to do this on both fronts: fan the flames of their infighting while advancing our new language to re-present (as in, present a second time) our traditional worldview with our new words for the nation (ethnostate) or family (Volkseinheit). We have to offer a tangible alternative and stop being on the run playing their word games.

>but that means anyone can write in the emotional baggage to it.

Words represent memes, and if the meme is powerful enough the emotional baggage doesn't matter. The last thing the NSDAP cared about in 1932 when it all came to a head is what the jewish press was lying about. They had their own propaganda machine just like we need our own propaganda machine.

>testing ground

Don't suppose you ever heard of "anti-fragility"?

>twist certain ideas into a positive light and make them a subject of mockery.

Wasn't this accomplished on accident when we got the MSM to explain what "cucks" are on TV?

>Notice that Leftists, when exasperated, demand that you read big 'ol books and that you'll understand then,

lmao 800 pages of jewish obfuscation to learn precisely nothing. However, you can use a "gotcha" trick here and just say "how come you can't explain the book in a concise, pertinent way relevant to this discussion on your own? I think you haven't understood the book at all". Schopenhauer teaches these tricks in his "The Art of Controversy" (which everyone should read). When someone calls you dumb, call them dumb back.

>while truth requires just the right kind of illumination.

Holding a flashlight up sure is easier than reading some wordy jewy book.

88da9b  No.11739787

File: 80a078b3d7a5a92⋯.png (674.78 KB, 627x749, 627:749, Hopeful Gondola.png)


>is pic related another good word candidate?

Goysplain would have been more clever. In fact I think the dissemination of the word 'Goy' is useful because to the non-Jew it impresses the idea that they view you as an ugly-sounding cattle-like 'thing', which is in fact how they view you for the most part. That's important for non-Jews to know. As for using their tricks against them, it's enough to use their methologies to wrap into their own ideas. Example is girlsplain, or heterophobic, or the like simply to make them either abandon the language or attack the underpinnings of it. Remember that their use of adjective-like language means you too can attach the negative shit to everything they hold dear and use the exact same arguments to decay it. Do that simply to confuse them, then stick to the /pol/ack lexicon that reestablishes a simple reality that is immediately more appealing than the muddle mess you've left them to contend with.

>Do you have anything to say on the spellings semitic vs semetic? Which one is more explicitly anti-jew?

Oh, I mispelled it I guess. Go with Semitic since it's spelled right so no one accuses you of being illiterate. The Leftist ideology wants to prove, even in minor ways, that you are unintelligent and uneducated in order to justify their bullshit. Don't give them a chance to do it and it really bothers them.

>fan the flames of their infighting while advancing our new language to re-present (as in, present a second time) our traditional worldview with our new words for the nation (ethnostate) or family (Volkseinheit)

That's probably the way to do it. Throw a few wrenches into their works, and as they try to repair their systems offer up the simpler, more realistic and appealing language with its attendant ideas to appeal by comparison. Make them spend more time defending their bullshit than it takes you to critique it. That is the strength of the language developed on /pol/ anyway.

>They had their own propaganda machine just like we need our own propaganda machine

/pol/ is an excellent laboratory and distribution hub for that.

>Don't suppose you ever heard of "anti-fragility"?

I hadn't, however looking into it as the building of robustness through the exposure to stressors is what one will observe in nature constantly. So in the biological sense I am extremely well acquainted with the concept. Struggle is not an enemy, but a means by which you become stronger. The word 'Agony' comes from the pain you feel in the pursuit of a goal in competition, and without agony people become weak and listless. This is the main refutation as to why the goal of society is not to eliminate all forms of pain. In fact, it should encourage many forms of agony to keep its populace spiraling upwards towards great accomplishments. /pol/'s success and being a hurtbox are inextricably linked.

>Wasn't this accomplished on accident when we got the MSM to explain what "cucks" are on TV?

It's amusing, isn't it? And that amusement is useful because it makes your enemies look like fools and discredits them. This whole process of inflicting mockery on your foes should be one of the most delightful things anyone here can do. The goal may be serious, but the efforts are just fun. If you want to get esoteric with it, the power of mass laughter is in many ways more potent than the power of pain and torture.

>Holding a flashlight up sure is easier than reading some wordy jewy book.

Or any book for that matter. That's the power of truth, because a truth properly conveyed just makes sense. The effort which the Leftist 'educated' drone goes through to read bullshit reinforces their sense of superiority and confirms to them the validity of those ideas in the same way that hazing makes the organization more valuable independent of the actual merit of that organization. It's massages their egos by telling them, "Only SMART people can understand the intricacies of this material!" and /pol/ has found plenty of mockery for the concept in how exasperatingly stupid and self-aggrandizing the Reddit fans of Rick and Morty are in trying to say how smart a show that relies on gross-out and non-sequitur humor is.

d6100a  No.11757829

Just use the words in their meaning.

Polluted water? Call it toxic.

138eb4  No.11768316


>is pic related another good word candidate?

Kiked mods didn't think so.

138eb4  No.11768319


Or "attack."

"Trump attacked soyboys on Twitter calling them diseased faggots…"

138eb4  No.11768342

File: f32d7fd04ae5a1a⋯.jpg (9.86 KB, 192x263, 192:263, index.jpg)


I'm rearing "reunification" a lot in the media. They're talking about spiclets, but I keep thinking pic related.

d60578  No.11768422


You missed a key one

"offensive" , "dont offend me"

this has a key connotation to colonialism and rules of engagement

Basically there are a few key things going on in this control of language that stem from the actions of where we are now.

here are some ideas to mull through your head and take into account the list provided by the poster I replied to

-modern civilization has decided colonizing is bad , this actually came from the colonizers (Britian) , only when pushed by America and India but still up held as the final place to colonize others … maybe manifest destiny is the last

-to hurt without provacation is criminal , this is actually very old world and is a basic law of nature

-words are powerful , pen mightier than the sword … this is very new in its true maturing, you could maybe caveat … the tweet is mighter than the nuclear weapon

-hate crimes, an action is more powerful if surrounded by particular words, words can make an action more effective

What we have here is an unfair guilt trip. A guilt trip that comes from a particular interpretation of the past. One without historical empathy or any kind of depth.

Particular words by particular people have particular power that goes against the rules of engagement and natural law. This is the meme at its core.

Any takers on how to counter act? Its unfair and at the core we should be able to fight back with the idea that "whats good for the goose is good for the gander". Basically hate speech can be applied against whites too. I think theres a better argument though.

-self expression, while it can hurt someones feelings is not an attack. Some one being offended by a word is like someone being hurt by punching a pillow. If there are such things as hate crimes , then do we outlaw voodoo? Is pricking a doll with a needle some kind of self expression that adds damage to the crime?



Slippery Slope is the phrase to describe possible outcomes of actions, it only confirms that the writer is a cautious one that wants their readers to think and consider other possibilities. I guess that is a bias. The kind of bias that hopes for a better world.

36f284  No.11770837

File: 12be5a8394e6f48⋯.jpg (1.7 MB, 2400x2000, 6:5, BlizzardExploitsPopularity.jpg)

8537af  No.11773096

File: 96354d42f5d03bf⋯.jpeg (68.79 KB, 1242x262, 621:131, 5573EDFA-C528-43FC-AD0F-C….jpeg)



This essay sums it up. Bastardized language turns humans into subhumans.

Also lol at google encouraging muh consumerist diction by calling proper English privileged.


8f43d8  No.11773104


who the fuck takes the time to make these? how much do they make, 20$ each? fucking retards

877b3c  No.11773108


Faggots, you can't reclaim language of the kikes define it in the (((media))). Gas the kikes, reclaim the language.

8ff94d  No.11788127


Don't forget "Weaponized"

db9ec8  No.11790606

File: eb1bbe3e66ca9c6⋯.png (24.5 KB, 757x183, 757:183, Origin and meaning of immi….png)

File: ee063de09d442e9⋯.png (13.86 KB, 740x128, 185:32, Origin and meaning of migr….png)

File: 518835b37b40631⋯.png (22.5 KB, 779x325, 779:325, colony.png)


>For "migrant" I would propose invader

I don't think this is necessary. The original meaning of migrant is simply one who moves from place to place, either within a country or to a new one. A refugee, an immigrant, a colonist, and a settler are all migrants. Moving to the town 10 miles away is a migration. In the context of the (former) colonies (USA, Canada, Australia, NZ) we have to make the distinction that the founders were not immigrants. Immigrate took on the meaning of moving from one country to another, thus foreigners going to a new country are called immigrants.

In the US context, the founders were not immigrants, because there was no new country to which they could immigrate. A colony was not a new country, it was a territorial extension of the home country. So British colonists were not becoming members of the Cherokee nation, they were British citizens living on British land. This deals with sovereignty and what happens in the act. In the US the colonists became revolutionaries who established a new nation-state, never once was this core population composed of "immigrants." After 1776, those who came to America and became citizens were indeed immigrants but the kind we have historically been willing to accept.

Then there is the issue that if "diversity is our strength" and "multiculturalism is good because it promotes diversity" but diversity only emerges through separation and if you put everyone together you destroy variety and then create monoculture. But they don't seem keen on thinking that far ahead.

b3ccc4  No.11793695


This is absolutely a problem op. Toxic is a very good one to point out, it's use as an excuse to crack down on literally anything problematic is growing. I like to point out and question these whenever i can. It gets people thinking, even though it generally is negatively received

34f85c  No.11800607

New language starts a new civilization.

Replace the existing glyphs/runes/spells.

Create a language that roots from love.

Create stories written in such language - even songs.

eec506  No.11811199


>play PUBG

are you out of your goddamn mind

PUBG is the worst fucking thing to happen to video games since


well the last fucking awful thing to happen to video games. Firewatch maybe.

c72e2b  No.11811680


manual = personual

management = personagement

manufacture = personfacture

mandatory = persondatory

manifest = personfest

maniac = personiac

mandible = persondible

mango = persongo

manure = personure

mandate = persondate

717bc9  No.11811828


I think a racist plan would be to toxicly use the terms in an entitledly meaningless way so they lose all force. Just make memes and copypastas using the words in increasingly bizarre ways and flood discourse with it.

Only slaves aren't entitled to anything btw. Not feeling entitled to stuff you are entitled to (like a product/service you paid for actually working as promised) is slave morality.

d07ca5  No.11811970





X - phobic (for various X)



hate-X (rally, group, march etc…)

violent speech

X - survivor (for various X)

online hate

normalize (when used in social context)

normalization (wuisc)

regressive (wuisc)

traditional (when used negatively)




X sympathizer (when used negatively)

"how dare you"


claiming to be an 'ally' of some other ethnicity.

"I would like to begin by acknowledging " historical 'crime' X.

Safe (when used wrt feelings, ala safe space)




dog whistling

X rhetoric (where X is hateful, sexist, racist etc…)



far right

socialist (when referring to communist)


undocumented immigrant

populism, populist

undemocratic (when they mean illiberal)

democratic values


jewish people (instead of jews or kikes)

activists (when referring to terrorists)

far right terrorists (when referring to activists)


And I won't even get into all the crazy sexuality related stuff since it would fill a dictionary.

d07ca5  No.11811972



sexual violence

To conflate even the mildest harassment (or unwanted attention) with rape.

afe2ec  No.11812033


communist word salad shit 4 years of hearing it has me programmed to get triggered hearing it but my response is the opposite of the others who get triggered; i do not feel guilt and emotion and tears and compete to be the most outraged which is what the programming is intended to cause, instead i get angry violent defensive hostile no longer wish to parlay words and want instead to physically destroy communists. I had on two occasions to be escorted off the grounds for my tirades and the cops refused to arrest either me or to enforce the communist control act by rounding up those instructors despite the clear evidence that they are subversives and such is illegal

cda196  No.11812103

just use their own words and insults against them. it's really that simple. you have to understand that lot of leftists project their insecurities onto other people. redirecting their insults back towards them will cause the greatest and deepest pain. of course it's really just simple "no u" playground bullshit, but we're dealing with people that have the minds of children here and it's effective. we can see that leftists already attempt this by trying to co-pt the word "cuck" and "snowflake" and it's completely ineffectual, but the same tactic will work on them i guarantee it

e75c50  No.11812214


Came here to say populism.

Democracy is populism. A popularity contest for the popular vote of the populace.

When its a democracy thats not acceptable to the left, they call it populism.

"Apologist" is in there with sympathiser.

e75c50  No.11812233

File: 53987eea1739ba2⋯.jpeg (46.12 KB, 739x415, 739:415, images (2).jpeg)

The biggest one for me:

When brown people go to a white country they call it diversity, multiculturalism and cultural enrichment.

White white people go to a brown country they call it colonialism, imperialism, invasion.

d429e8  No.11812490

Another one to add to the list is using the word "males" instead of "men."

"Male" can refer to any member of the animal, but only "man" can refer to humans. Using "male" instead of "man" is a subtle form of dehumanization. Not to mention makes you look and sound weak as hell when you refer to yourself a "male" instead of "man."

ecc36d  No.11816185


>ethnostate superseding nation as a more powerful word

Yeah no. Reclaiming the word Nation wholeheartedly and earnestly means much more than ethnostate.

When a normie thinks "ethnostate", their mind immediately drifts to ebil nazis. When a non-pozzed normie thinks "nation" they think of a country, a flag, an idea that symbolizes what they view as the purpose of the place in which they live.

If we reclaimed "nation" and had a more defined perspective of what that word meant, in relation to the US flag for example, it would do much more in the long run, and be far more appealing to the average person.

Remember that the US flag represents ideas with very different definitions based upon your perspective, which is why you have reformist leftists saying "I love this country for what it can be, improved from our flawed foundations" and conservative right-of-center folks saying "I love this country for what it was founded on and still holds dear to this day".

ecc36d  No.11816191


*the idea and the people which form it

ecc36d  No.11816227


>play BattlePozzed V

My goodness, the person who made this is retarded. Sage for pissposting

ecc36d  No.11816251


A Republic is better because it can more easily withstand an uneducated mob of voters. There's a reason the U.S. resisted being pozzed into calling itself a "democracy" for so long.

I may be talking out of my fucking ass, for I know nothing, but I'm pretty damn sure there is a strong difference between the founder's american republic and the "democracy" we call ourselves now.

“Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

“A Republic, if you can keep it.”

-Benjamin Franklin, when asked by a woman what government they would now have after leaving Independence Hall.

c90541  No.11816366

File: c5943cb4d21c016⋯.jpeg (362.27 KB, 878x2021, 878:2021, image.jpeg)


That meme is really aimed at normalfags to take the piss out of American feminists (aka marxists). Don't take it to heart.

>>11721699 (checked)

Language is a sneaky tool the left has used to push their bad ideas on to polite society. Because if they really called their ideas by their proper names it would trigger disgust in the average person. Controlling the language is like using lube before sticking it in. Some recent examples:

>Gay marriage

Ewww buttsex, diseases and child abuse

<Marriage equality

Oh, well who doesn't believe in equality?

>Abortion / anti-abortion

Dead babies

<Pro-Choice / Pro-Life

Oh, well women do have the right to choose what they do with their bodies r-right

These are only a couple of examples but they do it with everything. A shitty jewish idea is introduced and the public recoils in disgust. They come back some time later with the same idea under a different name to trick the masses.

pic unrelated

b8de5f  No.11857522

Save the fucking catalog this is their counter-attack after taking a break for a week or two to strategize. We need to fucking save the important threads. Browse pages 10-25 and BUMP BUMP BUMP keep that finger fucking tapping until every damned thread is raised out of this piss flood.

Save the fucking catalog this is their counter-attack after taking a break for a week or two to strategize. We need to fucking save the important threads. Browse pages 10-25 and BUMP BUMP BUMP keep that finger fucking tapping until every damned thread is raised out of this piss flood.

7e5439  No.11866210


Chairman Mao described these as 'magic words'. By using such words you control dialogue thought, narrative ect…

The best way to fight the lefts 'magic words' is by inventing and using our on. Pozz, and its context is very effective. Some right wing 'magic words' of the top of my head:





The more of OUR language we use and the less of THEIR language we use the better.

4a147c  No.11866683



I remember when I was seven, I told a niglet that he was using the word "racist" incorrectly. The situation started out on the school bus, and the monkey was claiming that something or other was racist. I informed him that the event would better be defined as prejudice, which is a bad opinion of another based on some factor, and is often the basis of treating a person poorly, while racism is merely the belief that one race is superior to another, without necessarily thinking or treating the allegedly inferior poorly because of it. Needless to say, the ape's one and only response was "You're a racist! Racist! You're a racist!" and so on. I eventually gave up, knowing even at that age the animal's limited mental capacity, despite growing up in LAUSD's brainwashing facilities.

27fcc6  No.11889977


>oy vey fellow goyim, games are so bad these days

>Play these totally kosher games!

c461cc  No.11890110

>>11722622 (checked)

>The only solution is to invent our own fucking language at this point.

Probably true.

62ca5a  No.11890185

File: ae8dfca4103135b⋯.pdf (8.47 MB, Madan Sarup-An Introductor….pdf)


>that pic

sorry but whoever made that is a peterson-tier brainlet.

here, I havea copy of this book personally, but just for you I I found a free pdf of it , really easy to read, free of normie bias

tl;dr its complicated, some of em are pretty redpilled, all of em are anti-marxist and anti-modern to an extent, they dindu nuffin, its the burger progressive academics who ruined it ALL

3e98f9  No.11890223

Weak as it may sound at first, I wouldn't mind a few willing white males terming any critique of white ppl or males as "racist", "sexist" or generally "problematic", and any time the SJW starts talking SJW talk simply reiterate how "triggered" they are by how "offensive" or "problematic" the SJW"s "racist" or "sexist" or "toxic" or "insensitive" ideas are.

Nice thing about this is that it simply mirrors their BS, while also having more reason and data behind it, generally speaking, if one cares to research or think about it.

62ca5a  No.11890257


ca62a5  No.11891922

File: a8d793c1fabb48c⋯.jpg (510.63 KB, 1280x738, 640:369, germanic freedom.jpg)

Terms like "ethnic", "ethnicity", "ethno-" are misleadingly used in place of "racial", "race", etc. Probably an result of the obsession with "racism" being such fucking heresy to them that even pointing out racial differences or simply stating that a person is of a different race is met with a knee-jerk accusation of "racism". They are too scared to even acknowledge the existence of race and substitute the words like "ethnicity" in. God forbid you point out that an all white community can also be "ethnically diverse" since ethnicity is a subset of race.

"Immigrant" is another I have seen subverted.

>We are a nation of immigrants

A nation of white immigrants. Like another anon suggested it would be better to be specific. Terms like "non-white immigrant", "invaders", and "non-whites" remove their ability to use lines like the one mentioned. Immigration is not the probem, shitskins in our land is.

"Multi-culturalism" instead of "multi-racialism". Multiculturalism is awful but the biggest threat is multiracialism. Cultures change overtime and absorb fragments from others they interact with naturally without drowning the gene pool with shit.

"Beautiful" is applied to everything hideous and degenerate. True beauty is degraded as being "oppressive", "patriarchal", "fascist", "old fashioned" and goodness knows what else.

"Freedom". Pic related.

f425fc  No.11892058

So far this is a very good thread. Really enjoying the read.

What I would add is that we should put a focus on morality more so than we already have. One of the main deficiencies of the Leftist is that they want to promote this idea of a 'grey' world, whereas we see things rather more 'black and white'. When there is no good or evil and everything is equal, 'shame' becomes a bad thing. But when there is good and evil, 'shame' becomes the most caring way of actually instilling morality - the alternatives being based in violence (which is what the Leftist does with their 'punishments for wrong-think' - be it social exclusion, authoritarian imprisonment or mob retribution). If we constantly portray them as evil (and it's pretty easy - I mean all those 'pro-choice' types can easily be characterised as evil people conducting child sacrifice and characterised in a Biblical 'Moloch-worshiping' way, Sodomites can be shown to be family-destroying, liberty-denying, selfish and disease-spreading - not to mention they have huge levels of pedophilia; and niggers, muslims and spics are so overly represented in criminal activities that they are perhaps even easier to colour as genuinely 'evil'). They call us white men evil, but why? We are comparatively peaceful, we want to talk and debate (as opposed to censor and shut down), we offer redemption (as opposed to enforced penance and guilt) to those who change their minds, we stand for the truth and for justice. We are objectively the 'good guys', and all they have to fight that is some deluded notion that 'hatred is bad' - NOT IF WE HATE EVIL.

The enemy is doing everything they can to get rid of the concept of morality. We would be fools to let them.

92f45f  No.11892579


>The enemy is doing everything they can to get rid of the concept of morality. We would be fools to let them.


c461cc  No.11893903

I think there are other terms we can use as well.

racism = race realism (thanks OP)

sexism = gender realism

homophobia/transphobia = biological realism

Islamophobia = cultural realism

Anti-Semitism = tribal realism

etc, etc

It all fits under the topic of realism, which is a good catch all word and also a nice easy hashtag #realism.

f425fc  No.11894110


This is actually a great idea. It would also be a good idea to start referring to methods used to combat blacks and muds as 'protecting our women and children'. We are not lying by doing; but the enemy constantly try to portray it as if we are 'hateful' and as if our primary goal is hurting others as opposed to saving our own (which is mad considering that we are all firstly concerned with protecting our own nations and neighbourhoods - we are not about to go out to Africa or the Middle East and start purging those who look different to us - its about defending our people in our homes). Always frame our actions in reference to how we're protecting our women and children and we become very hard to criticise. And as the quoted Anon said, always refer to offensive things as the 'truth' or 'reality/realism/etc'.

c5375e  No.11903213


ca62a5  No.11903760

Any sex act other than actual sex (penis in vagina) = mutual masturbation/ or <type of act> masturbation

"bbc" = shitdick

A proclivity towards Anal/eating ass/ass to mouth = scat fetish

Any non-whites with a citizenship = <country> citizen. For example a chinese male with a U.S. citizenship is not an American but an American citizen/U.S. citizen. This shifts the overton window in a direction where it becomes acceptable to ask the question: "Should we continue to allow <race> citizenship?". In general whites shouldn't need qualifiers like "White American", "White man/ White woman/ White people", non-whites should. Don't use qualifiers when referring to something that should be normal. Don't say "White American", "White man/ White woman/ White people". Instead say "American", "man/woman/people" etc when referring to whites and adding appropriate qualifiers when referring to non-whites or abnormal things. The first substitution I suggested in this post is an extension of this. "Oral sex" becomes "oral masturbation", "anal sex" becomes "anal masturbation" and so on.

However this rule might not be perfect since an exception to this might be found in something like the fourteen words: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.". Using the qualifier here means non-whites can't use the phase verbatim without demanding a future for our children. Another exception is something like


>A nation of white immigrants

I trust you are intelligent enough to decide when it is appropriate to specify or not specify whiteness.

d49207  No.11905583

English were meant to be a troll language

Maybe try learning pure Latin or Sanskrit

d49207  No.11905587



more like exhibitionist

c461cc  No.11909586

hate speech = truth speech

hate speech = hate facts (for trolling use only)

the movement against social justice = meritocracy

a85466  No.11909622

File: 9a88b1ce4a56ee2⋯.png (13.34 KB, 503x404, 503:404, murdoch.PNG)


I've got more for the list.



Status Quo

tacitly emboldening the status quo

a85466  No.11909749


What the fuck is this bot doing on every board?

b38fda  No.11931459

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


>"Words can kill."

>"Time and again, the country was ruled by a foreign tongue. When he was a young boy, he lost his native language—the bedrock for any developing child."

>"Since ancient times, every civilization's ruler has had the same idea. When people unite, under one will, they become stronger than the sum of their parts. And what do rulers use to bring people together? Language."

>"This world will become one. I have found the way. Race, tribal affiliations, national borders—even our faces will be irrelevant. The world that The Boss envisioned will finally become a reality, and it will make mankind whole again."

>"America is a country of liberty. A meeting of immigrants. Instead of simply assimilating, they live alongside others. So the Major sought a system that used information—words—to control the subconscious."

>"In his eyes, the greatest symbiotic parasite the world has ever known isn't microbial—it's linguistic. Words are what keep civilization—our world—alive. Free the world—not by taking men's lives—but by taking their tongues."

"With this, I rid the world of infestation. Sans lingua franca. It shall be torn asunder, and then it shall be free."

It's truly insane how prescient the predictions that Kojima makes in his games are. He basically called out memetic warfare in 2001 with MGS2, before 4chan even existed. Now his latest game calls out the power of language manipulation. He's basically the Japanese of GLR. Japs don't even really see kikes on their island, so that's the closest they can get.

c452b2  No.11957549

File: 4136781dde0515b⋯.jpeg (40.41 KB, 800x577, 800:577, 786786786786786787888ld.jpeg)

Ignore the spineless as they attempt to linguistically squirm away from the truth. Kill them with the truth. Disperse their fucking atoms with the truth.

You can say:

>What is your definition of that?

>What do you mean by that?

Force them to face the truth of their double standards and illogic.

bcb061  No.11963182


>A nation of white immigrants

The US existed for almost 200 years before it became an independent nation, and the vast majority of that time was as a British Colony in British America. Everyone who is an ethnic white and resides in the US is just as much of an American as a nigger, considering the vast majority of Irish that were brought over before independence were literally indentured servants and slaves of Scotch Irish. The meme of AMERICA THE LAND OF IMMIGRANTS has always been a tool of Jewish subversion, and trying to normalize outsiders.

c72e2b  No.11963247


The second one has nothing to do with men.

That's from Latin manus, which means hand.

Like mano in Spanish and Italian. The first one is from Germanic Mann, cognate of Sanskirt Manu.

Manus and words like manipulate, manufacture , manual, derive from PIE *méh₂-r ~ *mh₂-én-, meaning "hand".

Meanwhile, man derives from PIE *mon-

meaning "human being."

There is an English cognate of manus, but it's not man. Believe it or not, it's mound. The meaning has changed drastically over the centuries.

27fcc6  No.11963252

We need a reference book of disingenuous jewish definitions.

86b43b  No.12007851

File: 40ae2e28018cf0c⋯.webm (3.87 MB, 853x480, 853:480, Gondola_and_the_Ancestral….webm)

91f6ff  No.12008257


theres many

53731a  No.12008326




60c076  No.12008817



I have to go to work, so I'm just going to leave this here and hope it's picked up on. No time to write, hopefully anons will see the potential.


ca62a5  No.12009101

File: 0efa958f1f8b3e3⋯.png (127.5 KB, 745x848, 745:848, Religion and the Left.png)












>Hate speech

The adherent of "The Politically Correct Dogma" uses these words to label things as heresy, blasphemy, and sin. However many adherents are unaware that their religion is in fact a religion. Pointing out (perhaps in a tongue and cheek kind of way) that such things hold the position of heresies to them may help them realize that they in fact submit to the "official state religion" of "The Politically Correct Dogma". When an adherent labels something as "racism", for example, mocking them by crying "Heresy!" or "Blasphemy! That is blasphemy! You can't say that!" will undermine their efforts by making the adherent look like a sheep. "Progressives" love mocking religion (Christianity mostly), putting their own form of mockery back on them will upset them greatly.

Another thought is that if recognition of "The Politically Correct Dogma" is memed hard enough, one could advocate for the separation of church and state (just as "progressives" have done) in an effort to combat the subversion that has been rotting away in the government. I doubt it would go very far but it may get us some laughs.

0d6a96  No.12033139

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

This is the best video on language and it's manipulation that I know of. Everyone should watch.

e21d7a  No.12033168

All of it is 1984 tier reverse psychology.

People using the word "toxic" are the toxins themselves, people using "hate group" are precisely hate groups, and so on.

Trump was a genius for turning "fake news" against the fake news themselves during the infancy of the expression.

89f18e  No.12033761


>rainbow six siege

you can't even say nigger or faggot in the chat, they ban people for being 'toxic'

faggot-tier bluepilled game

89f18e  No.12033784


as some leftists have noticed, 'migrant' is primarily used now for animals

it is a very applicable term, many of /ourguys/ use that and 'invader'

f6be8a  No.12034343


More keywords:

>Virtue signalling




Also, there is a clear difference to the very use of language between a /pol/ack and an SJW. Even if 10 years passed and the topics of discussion changed completely one would still be able to recognize this specific style of writing/thought without knowing the keywords.

>They constitute great tools for debate and dismissal, but it is difficult to build a positive notion with such caustic terms.

There is no reason to use these words to build a positive notion. Rather, they provide the space necessary to create a much more detailed positive analysis, which is then funneled into the mainstream. I think that the /pol/acks' keywords you mentioned, although multi leveled, are primarily targeted for internal and at most online use. The Leftist terminology you provided can be seen in various irl leftist propaganda. I also think that the fact one cannot pinpoint exact keywords for the emerging right is actually a positive, since it makes it that much harder to attack it.

bf283a  No.12034568



I think English is lost. It's a mercantile language now. Every kind of subhuman, brown, yellow or red butchers it constantly to get by. I don't think it can be reclaimed. I think a more worthwhile use of energy is learning European languages. Imagine the look on the kikes, chinks and spics faces when they walk around and everyone is speaking German, Gaelic, Greek or Norweigen and they feel like the outsiders they should. French is probably lost too

f18851  No.12042115

File: a267e1c8fc7e0c4⋯.jpg (45.53 KB, 747x226, 747:226, Virtue.JPG)

File: 8a471f86e767b03⋯.jpg (74.34 KB, 749x351, 749:351, Hypocrisy.JPG)


>What I would add is that we should put a focus on morality more so than we already have.

I agree, along with an upgraded understanding of virtue itself, pic related. Virtue is not just 'being', but requires action in order to come about. And not just any action, but effective action. A man cannot be virtuous, cannot even be a man in his true self, if he is not effective in his ethical actions. This understanding should blast out of the water bullshit notions that being passive allows you to be a good person, or tolerating evil makes you good, or other bullshit notions that paralyze the potentially good man from doing what is effective and virtuous to bring about a virtuous result. If you are not effective, you cannot be virtuous.



I like that too. An objection to realism is to reject reality, which can only be done if what you assert is untrue. If it is true, and they reject it, that only exposes them as being literally unrealistic, blind, or otherwise deranged. For simple facts and notions that are obvious ("Race exists." "There are only men and women." "Islam is not compatible with Western values.") it would be particularly strong given it takes less time to throw out and back up those assertions than the opposition - who now rejects reality itself as per your use of your term - can deal with. A good one to put into the linguistic toolkit.


>Any non-whites with a citizenship = <country> citizen.

Maybe even a step beyond that is 'resident' to capture literal non-citizens in that.


>Maybe try learning pure Latin or Sanskrit

Latin regiments your mind, and for analytical sorts it is actually pretty easy to learn. The grammar also helps your understanding of English. Latin is also interesting in that once you know the rules, you know what a word is doing in a sentence exactly even if you don't know what that word is. I don't know about Sanskrit, but I'm sure it has its own useful properties.


That method of asking for their definitions and meanings really fucks with Marxists. They rely on you just assuming the meaning of things like "freedom" or "equality" or "racism" that they have intentionally swapped out the meanings for so as to trap the unwitting in compliance traps. Asking for what they mean and define things as allows you to dismantle them piece by piece, and most of them get extremely unsettled by it.


>We need a reference book of disingenuous jewish definitions.

A book would become outdated within a year of its publishing. The tactic of switching up words to hide the same definitions and obfuscate intentions and meanings is happening constantly in (((controlled discourse))). You'd need something closer to a wiki to handle it, and discussions to warn others when a new term is birthed.



I like that. I'm still of the opinion that goy and goyim should be brought to the attention of every non-Jew possible, as it is one of the few words in their lexicon that they cannot change in the above manner without losing perspective on their tribal affiliation. 'Goy' is naturally insulting, especially when you learn the full extent of how the 'Goyim' are perceived by the (((chosen))).


Looks and sounds cool. Thanks for the share.




This is important stuff, thanks for your research. Words in living languages evolve, and it is important to know that they didn't always mean or connote the same things they do now.


>I think English is lost.

I dislike this defeatist sentiment. It's the same useless blackpill that promotes retreating to nicer places and constantly back up and compromise and give in. The only purpose of it is to justify not taking action to fight against a threat to your people, and it is pathetic hypocrisy as per the word's original meaning. That sentiment should be beneath those of /pol/, and you too. You don't ban the words as >>12037253 suggests, but change peoples' lexicons of words they use and respond to. That is a cultural effort that no authority can make come about by clumsy and unenforceable laws. Living languages have to be cultivated like gardens, not just commanded to grow or die.

f18851  No.12042331

File: bf8da92f0d1c516⋯.jpg (87.59 KB, 755x488, 755:488, Degenerate.JPG)

Damn, not meaning to double-post unnecessarily, but speaking of /pol/ack language the etymology of Degenerate literally means to be inferior to one's ancestors, becoming unlike one's own kind. It's from the combination of de - genus, or "away from descent or birth".

So, Degeneracy is whatever quality that inherently falls away from what your 'kind' ought to be acting like, and what would physically, mentally, and spiritually make one lesser than their ancestors. I don't know of a good Latin word for it yet, but what /pol/ is constantly advocating for is either Ad (towards) or Pro (forward from) generacy, to either approach being like one's ancestors or, hopefully, to move beyond their already high mark. I like Progeneracy myself. But they require both a recognition of your ancestry and a rejection of Degeneracy in yourself and others that would diminish your people, and that involves all the virtues and considerations that interests the conversationalists on /pol/.

>So go be /pol/generate.

566f38  No.12045072




i like this concept. could even use the term regenerate (noun form -ate opposed to verb format 'to regenerate') to express the idea of rising up from a previously degenerated state.

b4e077  No.12046430

File: 59bb1b4b8c868bc⋯.jpg (90.2 KB, 499x499, 1:1, 59bb1b4b8c868bc7f091db98df….jpg)


I agree with your sentiment and apologize for being a blackpilled faggot. It's true, we must tend to the garden of our vocabularies. I just despair with seeing how non-whites infantilize, degrade and over simplify the language. It just feels as if all cultural context and significance has been removed from it. I'm going to hedge and teach my children multiple languages though.


You're telling me these fucking kikes invented and utilized these words in an inflammatory way themselves? I'm not surprised but I'm glad I am now aware and will do my part to spread that awareness

658765  No.12048678

File: 5c13a962aaad375⋯.jpg (48.08 KB, 600x518, 300:259, thatword.jpg)


>As Orwell said though we can't let them hijack language

And speaking of hijacking

In MSM and among the PC

>steal = hijack = steal

if a white guy does it

>literally = not really = literally

I literally died when that literal Nazi spoke to me said the antifa after talking to Olivier Faure

>racist = white male = racist

'institutionalized' and 'power structure' and other nonsense reasons. And noting to do with simply hating someone for the racial difference. To many non-whites would be racist if they stuck to the actual meaning.

>equality = equity = equality

OK, there may not actually be any sinister 'New Speak' agenda behind this. This may just be because liberal arts majors tend to make it through college with the vocabulary of a brain damaged chipmunk.

English is currently the Grand Master Lingua Franca. A well earned position, that can all to easily be lost if enough people give in to a mix of PC 'peoplekind' crap, ebonics and New Speak. Turning the language into so much unintelligible gibberish.

[pic] related to topic, not posted as a reply.

bcce91  No.12050282


>marrying the idea of nation with the idea of family


c5b86d  No.12050529


Csgo is the only based game on the list faggot

88da9b  No.12053395

File: e9e17ad80aaa328⋯.jpg (259.65 KB, 1280x804, 320:201, Wild Hunt.jpg)


>I'm going to hedge and teach my children multiple languages though.

It's a great idea, especially to teach them young. Start with the languages that have spawned excellent civilizations, like Latin and Greek. I imagine that if Americans taught students today as much Latin and German as we did such a lackluster language of Spanish, we'd have a far more creative and rational population.

As for the others infantilizing the language, you just use an expanded vocabulary to differentiate from them. For example, say fuck and shit for emphasis less. Find more evocative words to express yourself, and you'll immediately differentiate from many others and, more importantly, give more weight to when you choose to use curses.



It worked once before, and in English the term is basically unused right now with mild positive associations. It would be good to develop it into that full married meaning rather than just meaning any old group of people. Terms like folklore and folk hero help to show how they are refering to different groups Paul Bunyan folklore is very distinct from John Henry in their origins and meanings, true expressions of the aspirations, values, and concerns of the folk they come from.

b4e077  No.12066628


I actually am starting with Greek, and learning the sounds/alphabet from German. That "ou" or "ooh" sound isn't in the English alphabet and it's important for them to hear that early so they can say the sound later. I tend to speak with a strong and varied vocabulary naturally. I love those word jumble games like text twist because you learn so many words.

I concur about folk. There's a reason all the degenerate democrats keep trying to adopt the word when speaking to their supporters.

471082  No.12066862


>Democracy is populism.

Not at all. Democracy means that not a tiny group reigns. The block wich was the lower tier should "reign", but power is power in consent. There are groups who can't participate and groups who always participate (like bankers) and they both have to be included, reigned in and not burned by that process. This is democracy.

Populism is either muh majority, i.e. ignorance of the needs of a minority (cuck off Americans, a minority can also be somebody who speaks another language within your country since forever, like Rumantsch) ignorance (or concealment/secretly funded) of those who always participate in power structures or the legitimate its-high-times-ignoring of former ideas to introduce new ideas which harm leechers of the former system. And they scream populism.

979445  No.12067012

Solution; list the terms that have been hijacked and misuse them even further. Sound really informed about any given subject, but use the term incorrectly or even better, in opposition to its euphemistic use by the Left.

-At a time when definitions have been hijacked and replaced with euphemisms, the gloves are off. There are no rules, but for the rules for radicals; thus, there is no stopping anyone from making a euphemism for a euphemism.

-It drives home the point they themselves make, hanging onto and preserving Hebrew. In any Latin/Germanic language today, there is 'Translation'. In Hebrew, there is only 'Transliteration'.

d0beeb  No.12070361


>Everyone who is an ethnic white and resides in the US is just as much of an American as a nigger

The Brits were open to assimilating French and Dutch colonists when they acquired their land. The Dutch had assimilated earlier Swedish colonists, the French had done the same with Spaniards.

White people can assimilate other types of White people within 2-3 generations.

>the vast majority of Irish that were brought over before independence were literally indentured servants and slaves

No Whites living in what is now the United States were ever legally designated as slaves.

>The meme of AMERICA THE LAND OF IMMIGRANTS has always been a tool of Jewish subversion, and trying to normalize outsiders.

True but that doesn't mean you should support the opposite extreme: isolation and stagnation.

Taking a bit of new blood from time to time is good for a nation.

d0856b  No.12070372

File: 0ad9cc73a835b64⋯.jpg (108.09 KB, 600x793, 600:793, 1478838823903.jpg)


you forgot Implicit

498c46  No.12070432

Going to ask this here: what's up with leftists using the word "bodies"? As in "black bodies", "female bodies", "queer bodies," etc. Sounds like it comes from postmodernism or critical theory. When did it become common parlance?

33c86d  No.12070895

"toxicity" is only really a thing when people who don't get along are forced to do things together

It's what you get with modern video games with no server list

81c2a9  No.12070899

Demand people define their terms. and then call them faggots when they present their cocksucking definitions.

b8101c  No.12074493


what bugs me the most is when people use "they/them" for singular subjects. "everyone", "anyone", "nobody", etc. are all singular. they should be used with "he/him/his". and words like "child" and others without a specified gender default to masculine in the singular, but everyone has subjected himself to the mind virus.

and "there's" being used for plural objects. the proper contraction is "there're" but everyone is such a nigger now that nobody can conjugate a fucking verb.

3f71bc  No.12074830

File: 3a905f26d613eb3⋯.jpg (1.68 MB, 1256x2355, 8:15, 1408122716302.jpg)

>>12070899 checked

>demand definitions


315cdb  No.12075079



It has been proven that given someone inch doesn't stop them asking for another inch

31f005  No.12076964

Does anyone know more examples of hebrew/jewish code or language being interjected into our language. On the left and the right.

>The charge is credible because "Christian"

Gnosticism was the attempt to Christianize pagan

spirituality, even to the point of adopting some

form of androgyny. Hippolytus (AD 170 236)

reports that one particular gnostic sect, the

Naasenes, who worshipped the Serpent

(Naas in Hebrew) of Genesis, attended the

secret ceremonies of the mysteries of the Great

Mother in order "to understand the ‘universal

mystery.' "

Is this an example of interjecting judaism into National Socialism: Nazis?

Obviously as words are expropriated into other languages or disguised, they drop certain consonants/vowels or add onto the word stem to better suit the idiosyncrasies of the language.

f425fc  No.12077004


I think you're trying to make an attack on Christianity which is retarded, but if you want examples of Biblical influences on European languages then:

Sodomy (faggotry, after the city of Sodom that was destroyed for sexual immorality)

Jezebel (a power-hungry woman, after the evil queen)

Good Samaritan (kindly stranger, from Jesus' parable)

Judas (traitor, the one who betrayed Jesus)

Crusade (to take up my cross, referencing Jesus doing something/suffering for the good of others)

Zealot (extremist, passionate; after a Hebrew sect known for their extreme methods)

… and many, many more. We use Biblically inspired words and phrases to explain or expand upon a whole range of subjects. To attempt to undo this now would ruin all of our best literature. For good or ill, Christianity is a part of us - though equally we are a part of Christianity. There is no Protestantism without Germanics, there is no Catholicism without Latins, no Orthodoxy without the Greeks; the various creeds and doctrines are all undeniably influenced by the nations in which they were formed - the early Hellenic ideas were massively influenced by Plato, and to a lesser degree Stoicism. Just War and later ideas are rife with Italian idealism, and the puritanical strains are resemblant of Germanics.

f18851  No.12083761

File: a35331b3a3fbb9b⋯.jpg (55.88 KB, 600x450, 4:3, Leftist Confusion.jpg)


>what's up with leftists using the word "bodies"?

Good question. I can only speculate based on the usages I've heard, but it serves three things in my mind:

>Sexual connotation, usually perverted in either ugliness apologetics or weirdly paired with 'objectification' when talking about people like mere physical vessels

>Death connotation, talking about abuse or harm or pain or death on X bodies, as 'body' can also have that English connotation of a dead being

>Dehumanization, which is the odd one since a 'body' is not a 'person' yet they refer to it as such. Reminds me of the earlier usages of 'male/female' instead of 'man/woman' to dehumanize people.

I suppose it is a form of collectivizing the individual into 'bodies' so as to imply that harm against a black person is actually harm against THE black body, therefore all black bodies have been wronged. It's high disrespectful to the human condition in my opinion, as is all of Marxist language manipulation.


>Demand people define their terms. and then call them faggots when they present their cocksucking definitions.

Always. Never forget this, and never assume that the definitions for buzzwords are being understand by all parties as the same thing. Not anymore. With outright Marxists definitely make them stumble over themselves, but with innocent normies walk them through why their definitions might be mixed up.

Perfect example: Racism. No normie wants to be it, but everyone has a different flawed definition in their head as to what it is. The general definition requires the 'racist' to believe themselves superior to other races and to unjustly treat those of that perceived lesser race. A person who prefers their own people's company and is uncomfortable around other races is not a racist by definition. But the term has come to be used as a universal power word against white people even noticing race differences and acting accordingly. It's an obvious example, but important to explore since it infects a lot of minds of people who sheepishly ask, "Isn't that racist?" when you talk of anything positive about white people or negative about non-white people.


>what bugs me the most is when people use "they/them" for singular subjects.

I think it could be insidious, a sort of mental trick to collectivize the individual. It has always been bad grammar to assign the plural to the singular being, and the way you treat a collection of anything differs from how you'd treat an individual of something.

736054  No.12083781


One trick I've found is to use the word "Inheritence", "disarmament" and "opponent"

The difference, race/culture excepted, is that immigrants are expressly being given the inheritence of the native population. Not through force - they are being given YOUR inheritence, by your government. Much like an inheritence tax - it's like demanding someone explain why they stole your nan's will and dumped it in a nursery. You're not depriving the children of money, you're reclaiming your property.

Disarmament, not gun control. They are not trying to contain the use of weaponry, they are attempting to disarm them.

Opposition rather than a political ideal. It removes all connotations and "education" from it - right wing past, left wing future is the essence of the current educational system. No evidence for it, mind. These are people who dismiss the fact that our ideals come from the ancient Romans, particularly "control of language" in this case. Time is not strictly "EVIL RIGHT WING" to "lefty utopia" and things can get worse, or better, no matter what. Never underestimate the ability to fuck things up. They're not left wing or right wing - they have elements of both, and the terms are ambigiuous.

So in this case, the "left wants gun control" is literally "Your opposition seeks to disarm you"

2fb83e  No.12083789

I wish I could use the words diversity and liberal without the current connotation that they hold.

d1d770  No.12083887




f18851  No.12101787

File: 5b99e7e5c1e292f⋯.jpg (36.66 KB, 741x222, 247:74, Entitle.JPG)

File: a9960a4adebd878⋯.jpg (72.74 KB, 738x358, 369:179, Kin.JPG)

File: b3a6f978cbbb459⋯.jpg (76.48 KB, 744x353, 744:353, Sex.JPG)





Great word choices, and methods of explanation to back them up. I like Inheritance because it brings back images of the family, which I think is key in spreading redpills on race and nation. Disarmament evokes a sort of gun-seizure and seems pretty good for illustrating the consequences of such policies. Opposition is always a good one since it often is said as, "Our opposition," to involve the listener in those that oppose them, not just yourself.

>So in this case, the "left wants gun control" is literally "Your opposition seeks to disarm you"

That really is the key: Use this kind of language, and compel others to use it as well. All this language-talk does nothing if it isn't used, most importantly that those reading here use it. That is vital - the words we use determines how we and those around us think, and as previous posts have said it is extremely vital not to use the language of your enemies in anything but derision, mockery, or to turn it back on themselves. Thanks for your insights.


>I wish I could use the words diversity and liberal without the current connotation that they hold.

Sadly you'll have to wait until the zeitgeist has changed opinions on those terms, which might not be for awhile. If all goes well those terms will take on an extremely negative connotation that reflects on those who use it, and only after those actors are pacified or move onto new language can those terms be exhumed. But it would be useful to dissect what people see as valuable in 'Diversity' and 'Liberal', what images they evoke, and find new words to express those ideas rather than feed into the power of those hostage words as of right now.

I've been digging around in more etymologies and now going to old dictionaries to dredge up meanings of words we've lost touch with. Briefly here's the fun parts:

>Entitle: To bestow title (ownership) unto someone or something, the older meaning giving a name to a chapter in a book. One cannot be 'entitled' by themselves, it requires an agent to entitle them.

>Kin: Many multiple European languages attach it to meaning family, race, sex, and birth. It's extremely close to 'Folk' in our current understanding, obviously, but particularly close to the words Child and Kind. Again, a great familial-race word.

>Sex: Derived from Latin secare, from which we get section and implies 'sex' means a binary division of a race into males and females, not a kaleidoscope of designations.

14c978  No.12127384


I do.


>as in "divided"


>as in "liberty"

ffef02  No.12149214


I would like to see people stop using the inverted meaning of "based." To be based is to be vulgar, unrefined, carnal, and morally bankrupt.

bd1434  No.12149470

Don't forget to use the masculine and feminine variations of words to further trigger the social engineers.

7faafc  No.12149816

File: 3060e311cf231ed⋯.png (758.29 KB, 940x610, 94:61, Screenshot_2018-09-13 Meta….png)

File: 6bae8443b174785⋯.png (506.48 KB, 955x1077, 955:1077, spooked night megu 1512518….png)


>English is basically pozzed

Sheeit, we're in Metal Gear Solid V except there isn't a Skull face to try and save us.

>Cypher/Google, Wikipedia, Facebook


Why are Nips always right?

3f71bc  No.12151032

File: 0a598534ab79120⋯.jpg (105.1 KB, 400x345, 80:69, 19789999.jpg)

File: 6edf463820045cf⋯.jpg (39.19 KB, 500x471, 500:471, 1320217379746.jpg)

File: a885461d7179c62⋯.png (37.46 KB, 800x600, 4:3, ALOT2.png)

File: 23b7ccd1bf5586d⋯.jpg (260.17 KB, 700x1408, 175:352, 1394912832661.jpg)

f18851  No.12151297

File: 38ab6cd30db7024⋯.jpg (126.91 KB, 742x590, 371:295, Diversity.JPG)

File: 180b0b5e659c05f⋯.jpg (62.03 KB, 741x295, 741:295, Identity.JPG)

File: 3ce4c981cc6940d⋯.jpg (52.14 KB, 747x249, 3:1, Isolation.JPG)

File: 7b5fbabd239995f⋯.jpg (38.69 KB, 746x192, 373:96, Dissonance.JPG)

File: 7eb649790512e19⋯.jpg (51.56 KB, 742x234, 371:117, Harmony.JPG)

A few new etymological discoveries that might help in understanding the processes involved in the dialect of the Marxist zombies.

The two biggest words in the SJW lexicon are 'Identity' and 'Diversity'. They are truly their biggest weapons and framing devices, and maybe it has to do with the following:

>Identity: Sameness with something else, like a person or an idea

>Diversity: Difference and dissimilitude, so literally unlikeness with other things.

The key seems to be how these two terms are used, particular to what subjects they are applied to:

>Diversity is used as a vague goal state and pushed almost exclusively upon populations and institutions they label 'problematic'.

>Identity is used only for the individual's conception of themselves as to what generic group they belong to, groups that are just variations of oppressed and oppressor contexts. They sometimes foist these on people ("Nazi" "White Male") or, more often, ask people to 'self-identify' ("What's your sexual identity?") to get immediate buy-in to that mental framework.

Viewers here will see the problem pretty quick: Disparity and dissimilarity in an institution or society quickly breaks down social norms, culture, and security by introducing people who are so dissimilar to it that the system cannot hold. Apply this to everything from hobby groups to nations to see the same phenomena happening again and again.

This doesn't remove the human impulse to seek out likeness however, but that is where Identity comes in. Identity is used specifically only to refer to individuals, completely 'internally defined' to absurd degrees, in order to collect the dazed and confused from the Diversification process in society into pre-determined 'victim' groups to then be weaponized on behalf of the Marxist.

That's the offensive uses of those words. To shore up their own institutions however, they apply them in reverse: They Diversify individuals in order to befuddle them further (divided against themselves), and Identify these helplessly confused people into a singular, attractive unity of Intersectionality, which becomes impossible to avoid when the person 'Identity' became infinite uncomfortable fragments. This is Collectivization, the process of breaking down the individual until only their part in the collective makes any sense. The instability of the individuals spreads like a plague, and the vectors are the language.

If we were to give these two words more accurate names as to what they really are doing, they would be something like Dissonance and Isolation.

Taking these notions and their opposites, the reverse to this kind of thinking would be to discover the likeness outside of yourself rather than from inward speculation and to seek unification within oneself of our various parts. It happens that we have those words buried in our language already:

>Regenerate: To rediscover and regrow that which you and your social environment is born from.

>Harmonize: To bind a concord of similar things into a single, pleasing entity.

Diversity, divisiveness, is the opposite of Regeneration. Cutting something up or mixing it up is followed in a living system by the process of reorganizing and reconnecting of its healthy parts. Likewise Identification, isolation, is the opposite of Harmonization. Instead of setting everything apart from one another, it sets each similar piece in such a way as to create a different, greater whole than the mere sum of its parts (In biology and other sciences this is called emergence, and in music resonance).

These words and the kind of thinking they inspire are soulful, life-affirming, and absolutely anathema to the Marxist program. This thinking inoculates and strengthens a person and society by grounding them in observable truths and notions we often associate with beauty and life - naturally opposed to the disunity-decay that Marxist language elicits. A person who has Regenerated and Harmonized naturally recognizes how unpleasant the Marxist ideas are, as if the words are disharmonious notes in music. It doesn't belong in the song - even if they can't put their finger on exactly what is wrong with the bad note itself. They just know it is wrong.

They just lack the right words to express the idea they already have.

I'd advocate exploring these kinds of antidote words now, and consider moving away from this framework of 'Identity Politics'. That is the crutch word that those on /pol/ have reached for to try to describe the life-affirming and soulful notions that other words, better words, describe.

5ae604  No.12151310

I think even Marx would hate these people

Makes off topic posts, gets sexually assaulted by illegals per 8ch mods coordination.

5ae604  No.12151317

I am not chasing you down woman.

38ef68  No.12151318




As in "unchanging", not "same as others". An identity inherently differentiates one from another.


>divert or divide

>to separate

I think these marxist niggers just don't know how to use words. As most liars, they make shit up on the spot, it's not all planned out.

38ef68  No.12151320


Did you post about subies in the other thread ?

f18851  No.12151354


>I think these marxist niggers just don't know how to use words. As most liars, they make shit up on the spot, it's not all planned out.

I assure you most of them don't know what they hell they are saying. They speak as most people do, like animalistic grunts to express emotions and vague thoughts. But their lexicon doesn't require much actual thought to transmit the frameworks they operate under to others. Most lexicons don't require much from their hosts to work them in their favor. You have to remember that these lexicons are created by 'scholars' who have various amounts of propagandist skill and knowledge, and these words interact with a person's psyche whether they know it or not. Most of the time, they don't. Blind trial and error can evolve terms to be taken advantage of by the opportunist. But the fact that most people think 'diversity' is a good word and how its definition has changed is the result of intentional, directed processes. Ultimately it doesn't matter where the parasite comes from, just knowing what the antidote to it is enough for the average person I think.

3e98f9  No.12154610

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

3e98f9  No.12154614

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

3e98f9  No.12154616

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

f18851  No.12157384

File: 135c78edb78406e⋯.jpg (73 KB, 972x500, 243:125, d6839145996b265e0324295db5….jpg)


To summarize that one, here are the three responses currently available to the accusation of being 'racist':

>"I am not racist, and here is why…"

>"I am totally racist and proud of it!"

>"Define what it means to be 'racist'."

I think he covered the problems of the first two well, that they accept the framework that is designed for you to lose in, and the third I have personally proven in my own experiences is good to discombobulating the rhetorical trick of it as long as people are willing to discuss. The problem with the third option though is that to the unthinking audience and even your opponent you just sound like you're playing stupid. I think there is a fourth option, which is reframing directly in some manner or another. Something like the following when the racist accusation is used:

>"Why are you anti-white?"

If they sputter and try to say they're not or loudly proclaim they loathe white people, they've just fallen into the same trap they tried to lay out to you and you can have your way with them while at the same time dismantling their 'racist' power word. Most of these people know only a few magic words but not how they work. In Molyneux's DnD wizard metaphor in >>12154614, it is like someone was given a scroll to cast one spell that always seems to work but they have no idea why or how it works and have nothing else to use if it doesn't. Hopefully threads with topics like this inform anons on how the magic actually works so that you can go out and hand out the magic words to those who want to throw something back at the enemies of the Western man.

b362d6  No.12157470

File: 360f6f558a29593⋯.gif (2.06 MB, 300x258, 50:43, whiteDogRises.gif)


To accusation of racism, I reply, "I don't go in for -isms, if anything I am a racer, and life is a race, if only an endurance race."

f18851  No.12183551

File: ebbf1cef695da0d⋯.jpg (61.65 KB, 746x305, 746:305, Patriot.JPG)

Patriot is a reference to one's fatherland, and actually classically meant a somewhat negative thing of disparaging those who had ONLY tribal connections to bind them rather than a political body (State essentially). Funny how the wheel has turned on that one where now everyone has a State and the West can't remember its fathers.

780359  No.12184238


The Slippery Slope is an axiom.

f18851  No.12185255


>The Slippery Slope is an axiom.

Actually no, it is a logic device to describe consequences that is often automatically assumed to be false given the (((decay))) of the term. Ironically your assertion that it is an axiom is the reason why 'slippery slope' is used in the same way as 'conspiracy theory'.

A slippery slope is only a fallacy if the consequences described do not logically follow, but that's like saying a conspiracy theory is true if there actually is a conspiracy. The listener rejects your premise before you even state it if you get these terms used on you. In the mind of the listener, given the connotation the phrase has picked up by (((various sources))), the term is used simply as a way to dismiss an argument while sounding like an intelligent authority, which is part of its emotional appeal to the (((pseudo-intellects))) of the West. Branding the device as a self-evident truth led to this intentional misunderstanding. It absolutely requires an argument of evidence to prove or disprove.

a7dd93  No.12187679


>RS: siege - has "hate speech" filters

>LoL - has "hate speech" filters

>BF5 is self-explanatory

Stop sharing this faggotry; embarassing

c9f18b  No.12187788


Oh my fuck, how did we miss these numerals.

7bbea7  No.12187980

b8b54c  No.12197064


Kipling was a freemason

5e3929  No.12197488


>someone has good idea

>kikes said hes a kike

>therefore good idea disregarded

welcome newfag

we judge ideas here on their merit not on who says them

2783a2  No.12197491


Steal Chinese ideograms. They have no set relationship to pronunciation, which is why Japan uses them too – see the same symbol, think of the same thing, pronounce it in whatever language you actually speak.

正名 is the rectification of names. Words should mean what they mean, and English writing is pozzed.

2d3dbf  No.12199546


Just saiyan m8, also checked for truth.

7f2d4e  No.12199569

File: 4358f8b34472207⋯.png (19 KB, 330x324, 55:54, blue check with tranparent….png)



Not this type.

But, after we own Twitter, thus shall it be written.

ca954e  No.12202998


>after we own Twitter

But how? I've tried a bit of "activism" on there in the past and found out anything that challenges the mainstream narratives or can be considered wrongthink in any way will be shut down quickly. Perhaps presenting it in a humorous way might work, but I have doubts still

5e3929  No.12203818


So create your own social media?

5e1c7e  No.12203859

One word on the upswing is "IQ". I see it cropping up a lot lately. Both in the alternative media regarding group averages, but also in commercial America it's been coming up in a lot of company and product names lately.

15da10  No.12204327

Common decency as a euphamism for political correctness seems to be the one I am seeing most right now.

15da10  No.12204336


Sega removed a menacing rapey tranny from Yakuza 3's re release to appease SJWs. This was at the source in Japan.

78b128  No.12204357

File: c4554a25409bc18⋯.png (187.99 KB, 529x385, 529:385, lr3.png)

Bumping. Glad to see this topic up again. There was a really good thread a while ago about the subversion of language that touched on this subject. https://archive.is/ha7bk

There's also an /8diamonds/ thread still up about the subject, mainly contains the focal points from the archive >>>/8diamonds/2892

>One of the most interesting points from the thread was about a study done with the Pirahã people and their language.

>Regarding the difference in strength in spatial mapping, most human infants possess the ability to perform spatial mapping in different representations. As they start learning, their language determines which representation takes dominance. For instance, when describing the differences in the pitch of sounds, we use High or Low in English. In Farsi, however, they use their word for Thin to describe a High pitch, and Thick to describe a Low pitch. Where we mentally measure pitch in terms of length, Farsi measures them in volume.

>A more radical example of this difference lies between English and the Pirahã language. The third image briefly goes over an experiment involving a can full of nuts being emptied out one at a time. In English, we're able to verbally express an exact amount of a large quantity. 77. 96. 1,249. In the Pirahã language, only 1 and 2 are verbally expressed as exact quantities. Anything we would measure as 3 or >3 is referred to as "Many" in their language. The experiment showed that the Pirahã were unable to mentally represent exact quantities greater than three, as in, they were unable to determine the numerical difference between having four of something or five of something. It was believed that this occurred because their langue's counting system was nonexistent past the count of three. Their lack of vocabulary to express exact number quantities is responsible for their failure to complete tasks requiring that skill, challenging the notion that the ability to do so is a universal trait among humans. (Which was explained away via cultural relativism. 'The Pirahã don't NEED an exact numerical system to function in their society' etc)

>Differences in mental representation of numbers, motion, speed, shapes, and various abstract concepts, both slight and radical exist between languages that express them differently, or not at all.

5e73e0  No.12205553

File: 11aa23f37c643e4⋯.jpg (48.73 KB, 860x484, 215:121, image-481311-860_poster_16….jpg)

File: 2ddcd89e226c9c0⋯.gif (959.12 KB, 500x375, 4:3, giphy.gif)

File: 32bed639e53db76⋯.jpeg (60.88 KB, 639x479, 639:479, 00013c6d_medium.jpeg)


>Russian Feminist

Don't really care about the other countries enough to look it up.

08c244  No.12205699

File: fdcb697c02c24ae⋯.gif (102.5 KB, 200x180, 10:9, mlp_Action_hank_vs_pinky_p….gif)

Like a True Frog in shitty water, I hear a SJW's voice rattling round in my head when I brainstorm counters, cause that is the only pitiful opposition presented… all the rest is censored out of my sense range!

44fe9d  No.12205957


Im an american and I think Putin is the motherfuckin man. I wanna see him 1v1 that pussy jew netanyahoo.

63b6d7  No.12210668



>not okay

Are some others.

71727e  No.12213842


Really, most things that overreact to the 'importance' of something are how lemmings enjoy talking about things.

Stuff like "there are no words to say how much I love this" in response to dumb product statements.

3f71bc  No.12248225

File: 63c203dd02e4f77⋯.jpg (66.78 KB, 669x439, 669:439, 60d33b15e1c5f21ea346873a9f….jpg)

6957fc  No.12248514


So fucking what? War is war and the losers will be crushed mercilessely, you weak faggot.

f6c496  No.12248519

Meh. Whatevers

82a439  No.12257723


Great post. Good post.

ca62a5  No.12266520

a couple anti-white terms I have noticed are:

>generic white male

>generic/basic white girl

f18851  No.12295889

File: 30e0c1786fab69a⋯.jpg (125.26 KB, 741x629, 741:629, Kind.JPG)


Inherently connected to one's family, race, kind. To be kind to someone is to treat them like a relative. Reminds me of mercy and how it is not supposed to be indiscriminate.

1de781  No.12296045

One word I see getting thrown around a lot is "antisemitism" which bothers me since it's a buzzword used to describe acts of hatred towards Jews when Jews aren't the only Semitic tribe in existence. Why not just say it as it is and call it "anti-jewish"?

Then you have others from the Semitic tribes that people make example of and acts of hatred towards them are called "Islamophobic". Why not antisemitic as well? Why do the Jews have exclusive rights to that term?

a6f9cc  No.12304622


>However Islam is not a race of people.

The leftists "intellectuals" think of this as "racialized" as defined by being a distinct out-group in whatever country they are in, not "race" as in skin color. Therefore, Islam is considered a "race" because the host country they are invading isn't them.

f18851  No.12306220

File: 4c5e08c1b3ff8b8⋯.jpg (68 KB, 740x333, 20:9, Victim.JPG)



>Why not just say it as it is and call it "anti-jewish"?

It's a good question. The whole modus operandi of Jews is generally to blend in and go unnoticed. The very word 'Jew' is almost considered like an offensive epithet by Jews and Jewish-trained goyim because it identifies them. I imagine that Antisemetic may be chosen over Anti-jewish to distance the 'bad label' from pointing out there is a Jew involved. That or they didn't want to put an i next to a j or some less interesting reason like that.


It's a bit archaic, but victims are originally sacrifices to deities. It's weirdly inverted in its sense anymore given that most sacrificial victims had to be sanctified in order to be offered up successfully, while now victim has the inverse sense of having been sullied by misfortune or injustice. Today's victim praise culture is like a worship of the sullying of sanctity, either by the process of improving chances for despoiling or elevating the state of having been ruined. What kind of god would be accepting such human sacrifices? Those who are into mythological and occult studies might get a kick out of that thought I suppose…

5a6bd3  No.12306249


(((estructuring land ownership)))

Meaning CCCP stealing of land in South Africa.


Say "restructuring citizenship", to refer to deporting beaners and niggers, for being beaners and niggers, even if they are presently "citizens".

000000  No.12335667


fc715a  No.12335673

let's just make our own language



7411fc  No.12335692


There are millions of books in English before the pozz took hold. Study them and preserve them. Creating a new language will limit how much we know of what our ancestors have left us.

000000  No.12363665


Preserving meaning by preserving existing languages is paramount.


German for me.

f18851  No.12378857

File: 34de40b35194c5c⋯.jpg (39.81 KB, 734x174, 367:87, Arrogant.JPG)

File: b23f63b3721bd22⋯.jpg (71 KB, 740x311, 740:311, Insolence.JPG)


I'm convinced that a thorough understanding of Latin and perhaps German is a recipe for regimented yet creative minds. Plus knowing both of them almost guarantees that your understanding of English improves as well.


Basically to "Ask to or for oneself", as if reaching out your hand and requesting something. To do that is to already assume you're entitled to that thing, so it is a sort of presumption and gives rise to the idea of insolence and assumption. Lots of that today.


It's literally the opposite of what you are accustomed to, live with, or expect given your circumstances. In a word it is 'strangeness'. By definition foreigners who practice strange things in your society are insolent compared to you.

000000  No.12413193

This is an important topic, I'm of the opinion that language is one of the main ways we're being controlled. I don't think one can think without a language, at least it will be very hard to communicate with one another without it.

Google Ngrams

You can check the popularity of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5-ngrams over the last few hundred years (most interesting is ~1750s to now) here:


Or for those who want to do some data science, here are the Google Ngram datasets:


A few interesting things I've come across:

- sex was altered to also mean intercourse in the 1900s (used to mean simply male or female), gender was altered and popularized to mean non-biological sex

- possession was replaced by ownership, not sure why

- man has been replaced by male, woman has been replaced by female

- banking, bankers, and bank was increasing in popularity and peaked in 1933 when it quickly dropped off to a point a few decades before 1933, again not sure why

- accelerating, increasingly have been increasing significantly

- mankind, manhood have been decreased in popularity significantly

- stressful, stressed barely existed before the 1950s

- normal, normality have been increasing significantly since the 1830s

- problem, problematic have been increasing significantly since the 1830s

- pizza barely existed before the 1945

And a lot more, will post when I find it (again.)

30704a  No.12413244


> I'm of the opinion that language is one of the main ways we're being controlled

It is especially when the direct reversal of the meaning is employed. Awful used to mean full of awe (and only that).

Not "bad meaning bad, but bad meaning good" to quote Rick Rubin's golems RunDMC.

There are thousands of examples, but simply altering you brain to accept new and opposite meaning to a word (sound, waveform) is a pathway to getting you to accept "other" things.

000000  No.12413282


It's quite easy to make people stop using a certain word and being accepting of accepting a new word by simply attaching a different potential meaning to a word and popularizing that usage, for example:

Gay used to mean:

> Happy, joyful, and lively.

> Festive, bright, or colourful.

Then it meant:

>Sexually promiscuous (of either gender).

Now it means:


Sex used to mean:

>A category into which sexually-reproducing organisms are divided on the basis of their reproductive roles in their species.

Then it could also mean:

> Sexual activity, usually sexual intercourse unless preceded by a modifier.

> Genitalia: a penis or vagina.

Discrimination used to mean:

>Discernment, the act of discriminating, discerning, distinguishing, noting or perceiving differences between things, with intent to understand rightly and make correct decisions.

>The act of recognizing the 'good' and 'bad' in situations and choosing good.

>The quality of being discriminating, acute discernment, specifically in a learning situation; as to show great discrimination in the choice of means.

Now it could mean:

>The setting apart of a person or group of people in a negative way, as in being discriminated against.

>(sometimes discrimination against) Distinct treatment of an individual or group to their disadvantage; treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit; partiality; prejudice; bigotry.

f18851  No.12413386

File: aa8c573aca7952b⋯.jpg (42.25 KB, 734x183, 734:183, Privilege.JPG)

File: fef165bd472c417⋯.jpg (101.29 KB, 752x564, 4:3, Private.JPG)

File: dda28f02f1bb681⋯.jpg (408.17 KB, 1928x1348, 482:337, It was a Privilege.jpg)


Privilege means a sort of grant, commission, or advantage given to a particular person. The word itself is the combination between privus (an individual or someone outside of the government) and lex (law). It is a distinct idea from communis (community) and publicus (public), and this distinction sets people apart from one another and the groups they belong to. Like all forms of distinction and discernment, this is (((problematic))).

Privileges can come from people, or nature, or society itself. The way it is used today is to argue that any good that comes to you as a white person, whether due to society or the law or nature itself, is unfair as those benefits are not afforded to everyone automatically. Privilege as "private law" is a result of distinguishing between individuals in anything that can serve to distinguish them from one another. Families distinguish between their children and other children based only on the individuals themselves outside of merit or equality. You make friends and enemies based in large part on the individual and how they differ from others. Businesses distinguish between individuals based on who can conduct the best work. Healthy societies naturally treat their own members differently than it treats outsiders because they are built to grant privileges to its builders and their progeny.

But modern (((liberal notions))) of "noble equality" (an oxymoron) and the absolute sameness of all humans requires the disintegration of privilege in all forms in order to potentially be true and solve the cognitive dissonance and associated guilt. This is done consistent with the idea to break down the hierarchy and personal systems of individuals and societies, and inconsistently in affirmative action and other governmental policies in the vain attempt to make up the immutable differences.

An interesting note is that a privilege is often linked with the idea of responsibility or some kind of obligation without specific recipient in a noble or gentleman culture the Herrenvolk is the Gentleman People for instance. In the healthy sense, this means people directing their advantageous positions to help those who deserve assistance (friends and competitors within your kin - kindness), but of course this civic sense is hijacked to serve outsiders and parasites who are justified as deserving because they are distinct and pathetic. In any case the phrases like "It was my privilege" or "at your service" seem to assure the listener that their actions do not obligate them to repayment because it is the result either of their prior personal advantage or the nature of their relationship to help unbidden. This is a means of building up social capital since it builds on a greater sense of goodwill beyond the individual who has a certain privileges to utilize for their people.

000000  No.12413422



382f1c  No.12413465


>Pizza (popularized in the 1970s)


382f1c  No.12413483

what happened in 1962? https://books.google.com/ngrams/interactive_chart?content=hitler&direct_url=t1%3B%2Chitler%3B%2Cc0

94d952  No.12413624

File: b0c9a680d75f576⋯.pdf (73.77 KB, Marxist Lexicon.pdf)

File: c33a29e2fddfce5⋯.jpg (46.34 KB, 615x250, 123:50, SarahAndersenYouAreRacist.jpg)

I've been working on a list casually. Might flesh out. Some definitions from stuff like zerothposition sjw terminology. Mostly just my own list for reference and to maybe do something with in future for book or novel.

f18851  No.12434504

File: b64eda8fd0e2cd9⋯.jpg (27.6 KB, 740x150, 74:15, Include.JPG)

File: 7b63bc84bcc8ed1⋯.mp4 (5.35 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, Degradation of a Fanbase.mp4)


It's good to list their favorite language. Identifies what you want to avoid speaking yourself and what to criticize when you hear it.


Include is "to shut in", from includere. To include something is to confine it within a certain set of boundaries, which leads to the modern understanding of those boundaries being like definition or membership within a group.

Ironically the whole idea of dissolving borders and a hatred of being defined outside of their own absurd notions is paradoxically put up against their obsession with inclusion and redefining everything they invade. They do not like to conform to the groups they invade, and invariably begin a process of dissolving the boundaries they first sought to be included in with their own nonsense until the group completely dissolves. It is literally a viral process.

Inclusion means to be confined within specific boundaries, meaning that those boundaries should be defining the things or people who seek to fit inside of it and not be defined by those people. Allowing the prisoners to define the walls of the prison is as absurd as allowing someone who seeks 'inclusion' to redefine what the group is. The confinement idea also can show that being confined to this particular definition is not necessarily desirable and that people can benefit from definitions that they are excluded from.

96a696  No.12434861

Another call sign of the Leftist-



>"Racial realism"

I would suggest the use of something like-

>White (European) Agency

>Group Agency

>Collective Identity

or even >Ethnic or Racial Agency

The addition of words or terms is not so much a problem as their marginalization, deletion or replacement by inferior ones.


>'Solve' means "break apart" not "fix".

This is an interesting example. That's why you don't "solve housing", you instead solve the housing *problem*. The lazy use of this word can in the future change it's meaning leaving an empty hole where the other meaning was or ambiguity.

The lazy use of the word "conspiracy" instead of "conspiracy theory" is another example of a word morphing and thus leaving a void or ambiguity.

Many or the new terms and uses the Left introduce can be useful to all if employed correctly.

>Toxic Feminism (Misandry)

>Womperson (ridiculousness exposed)

>The Sex Gap

I agree with the poster(s) who mentioned the importance of love. Love for truth, for your people, even for people in general and the world we were given is key to clear thinking whereas hate blinds and confounds when it alone dominates. Hate has a place but Love must be the primary motivator.

96a696  No.12434979


>do we fight this?

One thing that can be done is to develop new words which are accurate and handy thus fighting off the tendency to lazily misses other words. One example might be inventing a term for "conspiracy theory" which is short and concise thus avoiding the tendency by even those on the Right of lazy misuse of "conspiracy" in its place. For instance perhaps



or >Constheoracy

Thus leaving the word "conspiracy" untainted with its original, rightful meaning. An actual collusion by two or more, instead of the mere speculation of such.

Some of the words developed, popularized or repurposed by /pol/ and the Right have already achieved this.

79a1b3  No.12435064

File: baf6aafd7ac3ab9⋯.jpeg (1.08 MB, 1024x768, 4:3, baf6aafd7ac3ab976f8697d58….jpeg)


I feel like troll is a phrase used by leftists these days more than /pol/acks.

You should change out Troll with Autist is would be a better fit.

Also don't forget kike and yid like >>11734492 said.

Otherwise, great job with the etymological breakdown.

96a696  No.12435383


>'Solve' means "break apart" not "fix".

You solve (break apart) a problem

You dissolve (unify) two liquids

Has the meaning has been flipped in common use?

e5de6b  No.12438378

> 223 replies

Oh, I'm checking that.

Here's an idea: Let's start calling illegal immigrants "assault immigrants". :^)

f18851  No.12438614

File: 21c7b60d3b9b0e7⋯.jpg (52.65 KB, 752x272, 47:17, Normal.JPG)

File: 01489b5ff9864e8⋯.jpg (85.01 KB, 739x519, 739:519, Rule.JPG)


So there's an interesting pairing between Normal and Rule. Essentially they are both references to carpenter squares, rulers, and other tools of precise measurement and demarcation. The Romans were particularly well-known for engineering, and even their language reflects the sort of measured, practical approach they brought to their physical construction.

As a result, Rules and Rulers are those things that guide the action towards the creation of a proper result. What is Normal is what that follows the Rule, whether that Rule is created by some Ruler authority or defined by the system you're in or, like the previous Inclusion, a results of the boundaries that define the group. That which is not Normal are those things that don't follow the Rule that stray from it and, whether resulting in happy accidents or unpleasant scribbles, are Abnormal (away from conformity with the rule). Generally speaking, most abnormalities - especially when it comes to engineering or complex systems - are bad and hence why the Rules were created to begin with to identify and reduce incidences of Abnormality.

That image of the craftsman or engineer drawing out a straight line to construct a wonder is the literal action from which we derive the abstract notions of the Rules and the Normal.


>I feel like troll is a phrase used by leftists these days more than /pol/acks.

Funny enough most people believe Troll means the repugnant creature and not the fishing technique that actually describes what a Troll does. Autist is not actually a substitute for what Troll defines. Trolling is an action of acting in such a way as to generate responses, whereas an Autist is the result of a mental condition and describes no particular action associated with it. But you are correct that /pol/ language uses Autist quite a bit, usually as either a pure insult or in a mild self-deprecating way like Faggot was. No need to throw away any of the tools if they still have their uses.


>Dissolve and Solve

Got you covered. The Latin solvere has a meaning like untying or loosening something, whereas the prefix dis- means apart. To solve something is to metaphorically untie a knot or loosen up the soil (think Gordian knot or hard ground or other puzzle-like things) while Dissolve is to break it apart into component pieces with an emphasis on the "apart". But those two meanings are so similar that they get confused easily since they are saying nearly the same thing.

96a696  No.12442970


Interesting. Great etymology.



It seems obvious why they are substituting normative. It has a different connotation. Example-

>A man and a woman together is NORMAL

>A man and a woman together is NORMATIVE

Normative weakens the meaning changing the connotation to connote conformity - something the rebel in us instinctively wants to reject or question.

88da9b  No.12449255


By saying "normative" instead of normal, it is literally collectivizing and abstracting the concept, making it vulnerable to deception and manipulation. It's the same kind of trick used with calling black people getting hurt as "harm to black bodies". They have to make things abstract and conceptual because in that realm is the only one that Communism makes sense, because reality is shunted aside.

88da9b  No.12473562

File: 7c1006a7de15d7c⋯.png (31.22 KB, 735x279, 245:93, Problem.PNG)

File: c02f97f2fb7fd2f⋯.png (17.72 KB, 741x174, 247:58, Corrode.PNG)



A problem is a difficult something (question, task, etc) which is proposed or put forward. Anything could be a problem, regardless of whether it actually creates a difficulty or even exists.

Because Marxist Dialectics rely on creating problems where they don't exist (the comparison between theses and antitheses without reference to reality at any point), it can turn anything into a problem that needs a synthesis, which they use to propose whatever it is they want. A problem implies that it could be solved and should be solved, which leads to the effective usage of Problematic to label literally anything as a problem.

In the prior discussions about solution and dissolution, something that is called a problem requires, in our minds, an untying or dissolving in order to set things right, just, and understood. This is what makes the Marxist Dialectic literally corrosive, which is to destroy something by taking away small pieces of it at a time, as if by gnawing. Traditional ideas that are not understood or revered are particularly vulnerable to the process if exposed to it.

Refusing to acknowledge the subject as a problem prevents them from putting it into the Dialectic as an antithesis and prevents them from abstracting the matter out to semantics and other linguistic trickery. This is done simply by sticking as close to reality as possible an saying simple observations and reasoning from it. The simpler the better given it presents less parts for them to corrode. A perfect example is the Robert Frost poem Mending Wall in the line, "Good fences make good neighbors". Another line I rather like from a different source is, "The Truth is always simple." By remaining as close as possible to realities and keeping your conclusions likewise simple, most of their efforts will be frustrated.

Remember that those who engage in these kinds of Dialectics are not trying to arrive at greater knowledge, but befuddle you into accepting their preconceived conclusion. They are not honest actors and must not be treated as such.

[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / feel9k / fur / leftpol / mde / s8s / sw ]