[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abc / agatha2 / arepa / christ / fast / hispint / tacos / tenda ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
September 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: c6a43d1a2022742⋯.png (692.75 KB, 485x726, 485:726, Christianity in the Third ….png)

098893  No.11987669

Today I am publishing this audio book. I hope it helps make this book more accessible to people. Public domain, CC0 fallback. Share this truth with whomever you can and however you can. I've also included a PDF copy of the book in case you need the text. Please upload my audio to other sites as well.

I had to split the upload into two parts due to upload limit.

>https://my.mixtape.moe/vuhgbe.zip

>https://my.mixtape.moe/cqlxfo.zip

Archived copy of the book for redundancy

>https://archive.org/details/positive-christianity-in-the-third-reich-by-cajus-fabricius

If after listening to this book you're looking for a place to start getting serious, I can recommend

>https://founders.org/library/1689-confession/

>https://reformed.org/documents/wcf_with_proofs/

Reminder to anti-Christian propagandists that

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalism#Premillenialist_dispensationalism

didn't exist until the 1800s and is not representative of a healthy Christian faith. I look forward to your high quality posts about worshiping a Jew on a stick.

Further reading

>https://archive.org/details/TheJewsAndTheirLies1543En1948

If there are any other books from the Third Reich era which are in the same vein and need to be recorded, please link them and I will look them over.

436440  No.11987679

>>11987669

>I look forward to your high quality posts about worshiping a Jew on a stick.

KIKE ON A STICK


ab25e2  No.11987686

>>11987669

Hi, paid shill. Try again.


423488  No.11987694

>>11987686

>>11987679

What shift is it in Tel Aviv? This actually some interesting shit so quit the fucking LARPagan shitposting.


919c74  No.11987709

>>11987669

>If there are any other books from the Third Reich era which are in the same vein and need to be recorded, please link them and I will look them over.

I have scans of a short booklet called "The German Church Situation" by Gerald B. Winrod that I can post.

https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Gerald_B._Winrod


098893  No.11987710

File: 905b60a5fc8aaa0⋯.png (366.07 KB, 536x940, 134:235, come_now.png)

>>11987686

>>11987679

Thank you, I love you too. Also I forgot to mention that the book was published in Berlin in 1937 by a member of the NSDAP.


41d573  No.11987739

File: eca53f2d7e32b92⋯.png (149.61 KB, 417x500, 417:500, 4be29283b5425dd5b7d569928a….png)

Thank you OP for your post and research. Ignore the retards


366605  No.11987760

Positive Christianity is one of the best creations of the National Socialists. It returns Christianity to Lutheran policies on seeing Jews as devil-worshipping liars. It adds in components of racial identity. It's a great way to build nationalist nations. People need a God, so give them God coupled with nationalism.

Thank you for providing this material.


869b4a  No.11987762

>>11987709

>I have scans of a short booklet called "The German Church Situation" by Gerald B. Winrod that I can post.

That sounds quite interesting. Yes please.

>>11987739

>Ignore the retards

You're welcome. They're typically mostly bots anyway. Bot spam isn't a meme.


e299f9  No.11987764

File: 62f70cddd38c565⋯.jpg (66.96 KB, 628x773, 628:773, 1.jpg)

File: 1df773358ae4eab⋯.png (330.28 KB, 600x1000, 3:5, 2.png)

File: ab705ab8719a346⋯.jpg (30.85 KB, 453x642, 151:214, 3.jpg)

>>11987669

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program

We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler

Article 24 of Hitler's National Socialist Programme of 1920 had endorsed what it termed "Positive Christianity", but placed religion below party ideology by adding the caveat that it must not offend "the moral sense of the German race".[138]

In Jan. 1934, Hitler angered the churches by appointing the neo-pagan Alfred Rosenberg as official Nazi ideologist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg

Alfred Ernst Rosenberg (German: [ˈʀoːzənbɛɐk] (About this sound listen); 12 January 1893 – 16 October 1946) was a German[1] theorist and an influential ideologue of the Nazi Party. Rosenberg was first introduced to Adolf Hitler by Dietrich Eckart and later held several important posts in the Nazi government.

The author of a seminal work of Nazi ideology, The Myth of the Twentieth Century (1930), Rosenberg is considered one of the main authors of key National Socialist ideological creeds, including its racial theory, persecution of the Jews, Lebensraum, abrogation of the Treaty of Versailles, and opposition to degenerate modern art. Unlike most other Nazi leaders, he is known for his rejection of and hatred for Christianity,[2] having played an important role in the development of German Nationalist Positive Christianity.[3]

In January 1934 Hitler had appointed Rosenberg as the cultural and educational leader of the Reich.[35][36] The Sanctum Officium in Rome recommended that Rosenberg's Myth of the Twentieth Century be put on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum (list of books forbidden by the Catholic Church) for scorning and rejecting "all dogmas of the Catholic Church, indeed the very fundamentals of the Christian religion".[37]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_the_Twentieth_Century

Hitler awarded the first State Prize for Art and Science to the author of The Myth of the Twentieth Century. The official document accompanying the prize "expressly praises Rosenberg as a 'person who has, in a scientific and penetrating manner, laid the firm foundation for an understanding of the ideological bases of National Socialism.'"[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Germany

On 22 March 1942, the German Bishops issued a pastoral letter on "The Struggle against Christianity and the Church".[69] The letter … accused the Reich Government of "unjust oppression and hated struggle against Christianity and the Church"

The letter outlined serial breaches of the 1933 Concordat, reiterated complaints of the suffocation of Catholic schooling, presses and hospitals and said that the "Catholic faith has been restricted to such a degree that it has disappeared almost entirely from public life" and even worship within churches in Germany "is frequently restricted or oppressed", while in the conquered territories (and even in the Old Reich), churches had been "closed by force and even used for profane purposes". The freedom of speech of clergymen had been suppressed and priests were being "watched constantly" and punished for fulfilling "priestly duties" and incarcerated in Concentration camps without legal process. Religious orders had been expelled from schools, and their properties seized, while seminaries had been confiscated "to deprive the Catholic priesthood of successors".[70] The bishops denounced the Nazi euthanasia program


869b4a  No.11987767

>>11987762

Oh… It changed my ID. Interesting.


63b93c  No.11987772

>deleted by polvol2 in 3.2.1…


e299f9  No.11987781

File: 47be55f776d08d8⋯.jpg (223.98 KB, 1500x1151, 1500:1151, 1.jpg)

File: d952d9fbe952661⋯.jpg (61.91 KB, 1068x496, 267:124, 2.jpg)

File: 11b700a31d18c30⋯.jpg (588.15 KB, 1191x1410, 397:470, 3.jpg)

File: 377da450bd18538⋯.jpg (35.72 KB, 714x430, 357:215, 4.jpg)

File: 0f7819d7b5b5117⋯.png (450.91 KB, 664x664, 1:1, 5.png)

>>11987669

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XI_and_Germany

As the extreme nature of Nazi racial antisemitism became obvious, and as Mussolini in the late 1930s began imitating Hitler's anti-Jewish race laws in Italy, Pius XI was perturbed. In the 1930s, he urged Mussolini to ask Hitler to restrain the anti-Semitic actions taking place in Germany.[48] When the newly installed Nazi Government began to instigate its program of antisemitism, Pope Pius ordered the Papal Nuncio in Berlin, Cesare Orsenigo, to "look into whether and how it may be possible to become involved" in their aid. Orsenigo proved a poor instrument in this regard, concerned more with the anti-church policies of the Nazis and how these might effect German Catholics, than with taking action to help German Jews.[49]

Following the Anschluss and the extension of antisemitic laws in Germany, Jewish refugees sought sanctuary outside the Reich. In Rome, Pius XI told a group of Belgian pilgrims on 6 September 1938, that it was not possible for Christians to participate in anti-Semitism:"[54] "Mark well that in the Catholic Mass, Abraham is our Patriarch and forefather. Anti-Semitism is incompatible with the lofty thought which that fact expresses. It is a movement with which we Christians can have nothing to do. No, no, I say to you it is impossible for a Christian to take part in anti-Semitism. It is inadmissible. Through Christ and in Christ we are the spiritual progeny of Abraham. Spiritually, we [Christians] are all Semites"[55]

On 11 November 1938, following Kristallnacht, Pope Pius XI joined Western leaders in condemning the pogrom. In response, the Nazis organised mass demonstrations against Catholics and Jews in Munich, and the Bavarian Gauleiter Adolf Wagner declared before 5,000 protesters: "Every utterance the Pope makes in Rome is an incitement of the Jews throughout the world to agitate against Germany".[56] On 21 November, in an address to the world's Catholics, the Pope rejected the Nazi claim of racial superiority, and insisted instead that there was only a single human race. Robert Ley, the Nazi Minister of Labour declared the following day in Vienna: "No compassion will be tolerated for the Jews. We deny the Pope's statement that there is but one human race. The Jews are parasites."


e299f9  No.11987784

File: a62e5fa57a28332⋯.jpg (122.01 KB, 679x480, 679:480, 1.jpg)

File: 44e5ebf9cb053ad⋯.jpg (93.13 KB, 1024x645, 1024:645, 2.jpg)

File: e485a4dc61b3a44⋯.jpg (187.28 KB, 960x684, 80:57, 3.jpg)

File: 110206126cb1541⋯.jpg (62.37 KB, 620x604, 155:151, 4.jpg)

>>11987669

care to explain this?

http://biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God. For I tell you that Christ has become a servant of the Jews on behalf of God’s truth, so that the promises made to the patriarchs might be confirmed and, moreover, that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy. As it is written:

“Therefore I will praise you among the Gentiles;

I will sing the praises of your name.”

Again, it says,

“Rejoice, you Gentiles, with his people.”

And again,

“Praise the Lord, all you Gentiles;

let all the peoples extol him.”

And again, Isaiah says,

“The Root of Jesse will spring up,

one who will arise to rule over the nations;

in him the Gentiles will hope.”

http://biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.


e299f9  No.11987796

File: b9a971944e8399a⋯.jpg (374.98 KB, 567x760, 567:760, 1.jpg)

File: c5cbe623a934d19⋯.jpg (413.49 KB, 535x760, 107:152, 2.jpg)

File: 30b1e0025e5d347⋯.jpg (448.65 KB, 506x760, 253:380, 3.jpg)

File: be547072458aeea⋯.jpg (364.66 KB, 565x760, 113:152, 4.jpg)

File: e5e5379cf4ffcb4⋯.jpg (367.51 KB, 760x482, 380:241, 5.jpg)

>>11987669

the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of race, sexual dichotomy, intelligence, physical health, aptitude, "virtue morality", and everything else that is not jesus christ/trinity.

europe largely did pretty well because europeans largely ignored those poisonous & evil christian ideas in favor of native european ideas, but advances in technology like the printing press resulted in the broader dissemination of these evil christian ideas, and that - combined with the disastrous results of World War II (reminder: Hitler persecuted Christianity) - led to present-day "late stage" christianity in society where racism is a sin and christian priests marry interracial couples in christian churches.

among other things, interracial cuckoldry is evil and your christian faith cannot change that.


0e48dd  No.11987833

>>11987669

Christianity neither supports nor condemns a white nationalist society. It has nothing to do with worldly functions. It's simply about the life, death, and resurrection of Christ. It shouldn't be used in conjunction with white nationalism/ National Socialism or any other political ideology.

It is true, however, that western Europe was vastly more racially homogenous when Christianity still had a strong foothold on Europe. There is a correlation between irreligion and the "cuckedness" of a nation. The most irreligious nations tend to be the most cucked in terms of politics and demographics.


0c8e27  No.11987842

>>11987764

>Imply all sane people don't recognize the kikery of the Roman Catholics

Thanks for the sperg-out, schlomo


65c17d  No.11987845

>>11987669

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89liphas_L%C3%A9vi

Read about this catholic communist and then tell me that catholicism isn't just communism in disguise.


0e3182  No.11987847

File: 1d54874ac50c721⋯.jpg (412.19 KB, 629x1025, 629:1025, cvrorig.jpg)

File: 6fba7b459be6f90⋯.jpg (210.49 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, img_0510.jpg)

File: 8b92e6124ad19c6⋯.jpg (163.73 KB, 766x1024, 383:512, img_0512.jpg)

File: 053c209b3ace863⋯.jpg (45.5 KB, 300x232, 75:58, img_0774-001.jpg)

File: a42766b0e23f304⋯.jpg (40.66 KB, 300x182, 150:91, img_0799-001.jpg)

Good thread, OP.

>>11987679

>>11987686

>>11987711

Negated.


0fe513  No.11987850

I’m gonna be honest

Christianity Centers your heritage and history on dessert dwellers about 2-3k years ago

Then frames the more recent centuries on the growing cult of Christ.

Most of Europe wasn’t even Christian by country 1000 years ago, and nearly all non kings didn’t practice it for many centuries after until various heresy hunts started.

I can’t say I support being or acting Christian in this day and age as anything more than a crypto trick to get ahead in some Christian communities.

Kids should learn reason and logic at home instead of Semitic fairytales. Aka Greek ancient culture as a frame, your national culture as a centre.


0c8e27  No.11987882

File: 405fd34511e8dfe⋯.jpg (19.78 KB, 528x390, 88:65, hellflag.jpg)

>>11987850

Wew, you hooknose fucks are working hard as usual. Spreading that same old narcissistic lie that the Old Testament is about jews.

Adam and Eve? Not jews. Noah and his family? Not jews. Job? Not a jew. Ruth? Not a jew. Who is the highest, most powerful priest mentioned in the Old Testament? The one over even Abraham, the father of all Hebrews? Was it Aaron, Moses' brother?

Nope, it was Melchizedek, the gentile Priest King of Salem.

Time to deal with a sad, sad fact, kikes

THE BIBLE ISN'T FOR YOU, IT'S TO WARN US ABOUT HOW DEGENERATE YOU SATANIC FUCKTARDS ARE


320fcf  No.11987886

File: e11617f8b67a178⋯.jpg (4.66 MB, 1960x8280, 49:207, National Socialism and Chr….jpg)

>>11987669

You do realize 'Positive Christianity' was just a ruse, right?


000000  No.11987909

>>11987882

>reads the OT

>wants to be related genetically to any of the people described therein

whatever you wish, fag.


869b4a  No.11987911

File: b062d4fd301afb6⋯.mp4 (5.52 MB, 320x240, 4:3, Israel, Jews, Zionists Sem….mp4)

>>11987764

>second picture

>>11987781

>>11987845

I (OP) am not Roman Catholic and neither was the author. Tailor your attacks accordingly.

>In Jan. 1934, Hitler angered the churches by appointing the neo-pagan Alfred Rosenberg as official Nazi ideologist.

>Rosenberg is considered one of the main authors of key National Socialist ideological creeds

Of course Wikipedia, which is edited by Israelis, video related, is going to try to paint the NSDAP as non-Christian. That's the whole issue that this book is dealing with… The Jewish and Marxist propaganda, which you're regurgitating, is intended to make other nations turn against National Socialism. You're quoting Israelis, I'm quoting a member of the NSDAP >>11987710

>>11987760

>People need a God, so give them God coupled with nationalism.

The Christianity of National Socialism is not a superficial one. The Christian worldview is the basis of the Nationalism found in National Socialism.

>>11987784

>care to explain this?

You're engaging in eisegetical cherry picking. Read Romans from start to finish in one sitting and it will make more sense. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

>>11987796

>the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of…

The author talks about you. Perhaps you may wish to hear his arguments.

>(reminder: Hitler persecuted Christianity)

No, he went after a bunch of traitorous Priests which were almost entirely from the territory that Germany reclaimed from Poland. The territory that had been occupied by communists, surprise surprise.

>interracial cuckoldry is evil

Golly, you don't say?

>>11987833

>Christianity neither supports nor condemns a white nationalist society

It is God who defines the nations. They are his conceptions, not the arbitrary inventions of man. This has to do with the God ordained order of things.

>>11987850

>Kids should learn reason and logic at home instead of Semitic fairytales

Who exactly do you suppose has been the primary force promoting the education of logic and reason for the past few thousand years…? In my little church we teach children biblical Greek.

>>11987882

>The one over even Abraham, the father of all Hebrews?

Remember that Abraham was declared righteous by God for his faith before he was circumcised.


320fcf  No.11987951

File: 9f61b5f5d84f555⋯.jpg (487.06 KB, 1068x1744, 267:436, Christianity - Quiet Down ….jpg)

File: 2f9e9c14114010e⋯.jpg (247.9 KB, 1429x997, 1429:997, The 'Accomplishments' of C….jpg)

>>11987886

>>11987911

>Hitler Youth leader handbook describes Christian churches as universality anti-racialist organizations on-par with Marxism and Freemasonry

<ITS JUST WIKIJEW LYING TO YOU!

You death-cultists Jew-worshippers never change.


320fcf  No.11987986

File: 5c5ddd216ba45a0⋯.png (891.24 KB, 988x1181, 988:1181, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 5c5ddd216ba45a0⋯.png (891.24 KB, 988x1181, 988:1181, ClipboardImage.png)

File: 50e81d0797830a9⋯.png (596.56 KB, 949x1219, 949:1219, ClipboardImage.png)

>>11987911

>Read Romans from start to finish in one sitting and it will make more sense. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

This is nothing more than the equivalent of Mike Enoch screeching "MUH CONTEXT" over and over whenever his Jewishness is revealed.

>Who exactly do you suppose has been the primary force promoting the education of logic and reason for the past few thousand years…?

Well considering Christianity didn't exist prior to like a 2,000 years ago and wasn't heavily practised by the European folk until like 1,000 years ago, that sounds like bullshit from someone who wants us to forget that the Romans and Greeks were doing that shit better and before.

Protip: Cajus Fabricius left the National Socialist party in 1940 and wound up in a concentration camp.

Pics related.


e299f9  No.11987995

>>11987833

>Christianity neither supports nor condemns a white nationalist society. It has nothing to do with worldly functions. It's simply about the life, death, and resurrection of Christ.

see >>11987796

the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of race, sexual dichotomy, intelligence, physical health, aptitude, "virtue morality", and everything else that is not jesus christ/trinity.

>>11987833

>It is true, however, that western Europe was vastly more racially homogenous when Christianity still had a strong foothold on Europe.

are you sure about that? how many jews were in Western Europe before christianity?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_Europe

the Jewish diaspora reached Europe in the Roman Empire period, the Jewish community in Italy dating to around AD 70 and records of Jews settling Central Europe (Gaul) from the 5th century


320fcf  No.11988005

>>11987995

Daily Reminder that the last Pagan Emperor of Rome - Julian - attempted to drive the Jews back to the Levant and to use them as fodder for combating the Persians.

He offered - more like demanded - they rebuild the temple at Jerusalem and get the fuck out of Europe, as he viewed them as a hostile factor and one which was associated with the rise of Christendom in European lands, which he - having been raised as a Christian, and having rejected that Semitic cult - found distasteful.

Then he was a replaced by a Christian who 'persecuted' the Jews… by letting them stay in European lands.


ab25e2  No.11988036

>>11987995

Nope, try again, paid jewish shill.


869b4a  No.11988037

>>11987951

>Hitler Youth leader handbook

Got a source for that?

>>11987986

>Pics related.

The wording in those pics make it very clear that this is being written by a source hostile to National Socialism. I have to wonder why you're referencing such a source. It's convenient that you didn't identify who they are either.


e299f9  No.11988046

File: 4e184213d0b3c64⋯.png (606.15 KB, 800x600, 4:3, 1.png)

File: 3c45f16be5fc902⋯.jpg (605.46 KB, 864x2780, 216:695, 2.jpg)

File: 0782cdf3fb279da⋯.jpg (557.77 KB, 1756x1804, 439:451, 3.jpg)

>>11987911

credit for the following text goes to the other poster(s) that wrote it:

>It's hard to believe that people on /pol/ still believe in a semitic faith

Some are obviously JIDF. Some. The rest are mentally deranged semitic worshipers. Each of them have their own headcanon that revolves around denying objective incriminating flaws with christianity. There's no consistency with any of them. They get proven wrong and called out, then they show up in a new thread to recycle the same old points.

Here's some off the top of my head:

> the jews in the bible were good jews!

> wait, they weren't even jews, they were white!

> the old testament proves the based jews were white!

> the old testament is jewish and you don't need it, also read the KJV version only

> the greek original bible doesn't matter either, but read the KJV and dead sea scrolls

> don't believe people who bring up the plagiarism in the old testament, they are pagan LARPers

> the plagiarism in the old testament proves the old testament is jewish, but the new testament is okay

> carbon dating isn't perfect so it's okay that saul of tarsus' letters are older than the books of the old testament

> [placeholder for pathetic attempt to explain why saul of tarsus is explicitly mentioning the plan to convert gentiles to christianity]

> christianity was perfect up until vatican II

> [placeholder for pathetic attempt to explain why the vatican helped the rothchilds become rich]

Bonus: look up testimony on how it used to be customary to kiss the pope's feet if you visited, but never for the rothchilds

> christianity was perfect up until (or after) luther/protestantism

> christianity was perfect up until the council of nicea

> christianity was perfect up until saul of tarsus showed up

> christianity was perfect when it was just gnostic cults

> true christianity has never been tried

> any flavor of christianity is okay as long as it's not ___, also it's good paganism is dead

> killing pagans and supporting would-be rulers with weapons and money who would convert the populace to christianity was okay

^This is not an exaggeration. A semite worshiper has said this on /pol/, with no irony or sarcasm. For that matter, everything I'm listing has been said multiple times across tons of pointless threads

> [placeholder for pathetic attempt to excuse the (((holy roman empire))) in pagan genocides and burning of libraries]

> my specific interpretation of _ means _, therefore christianity is anti-jewish

> [insert revelations re-interpretation, even though it's literally just a jew's pathetic attempt to talk bad about rome and wish for its destruction]

^ The reference to babylon is explicitly a callback to when jews were kvetching about babylon in the old testament - jews saw rome as the new babylon

> christianity will save the white race

> the KJV will (literally) save whites

> jews hate christianity, therefore christianity is good for whites - also the jews in the bible were actually white, but it's okay if they weren't because they were good jews

> jesus whipped jews in a temple, therefore he wasn't jewish and jews hate jesus

> [placeholder for pathetic attempt to disprove that (((jesus))) literally and only hated the pharisees and thus christianity is originally just jew infighting and saul of tarsus saw it as an attempt to make a cult to control whites aka gentiles]

> christianity is literally the reason why whites advanced beyond mud huts

> christianity is literally responsible for all of whites' accomplishments

> my favorite non-christian fiction is actually referencing christianity, and the author owes his his genius to jesus

Note: All placeholders represent major flaws that no semite worshiper has ever answered, because they can't.

Note 2: I am very sure I missed many pointless semitic worship recycled delusions, but if you think this list is long, an exhaustive list would be way longer.

For good measure, because of a definitive lack of actual historical evidence, it's far more likely that saul of tarsus invented the jesus story. Every non-biblical historian mentioning jesus only mentions him because they were noting their observations of christians, who were observed as odd characters. There are two exceptions. One was a gentile historian that worked with the early christians. Archeologists have learned over time that all of his work is fraudulent. Most damning is that his source was a jewish historian. I reiterate: there is an actual and verifiable case that (((jesus))) is not just a fictional invention, but his story was invented precisely when saul of tarsus was sending letters, and this easily explains why some of saul's references to (later) new testament details do not match up.

>Anyone here gonna respond to this guy?

Why would they? Christcucks never argue in good faith. If you read his post, you read every christian thread on /pol/.


0c8e27  No.11988050

File: 5a02ca98b741c46⋯.jpg (19.31 KB, 424x351, 424:351, torball02.jpg)

>>11987909

ID: 000000


e299f9  No.11988072

File: cf4a2e862dc46ef⋯.jpg (179.43 KB, 690x612, 115:102, 1.jpg)

File: 2da97956e8e12ca⋯.jpg (322.59 KB, 555x650, 111:130, 2.jpg)

File: 613c5af5dbcd6d3⋯.jpg (157.89 KB, 368x661, 368:661, 3.jpg)

>>11987911

>The Christian worldview is the basis of the Nationalism found in National Socialism.

>It is God who defines the nations. They are his conceptions, not the arbitrary inventions of man. This has to do with the God ordained order of things.

>Remember that Abraham was declared righteous by God for his faith before he was circumcised.

credit for the following text goes to the other poster(s) that wrote it:

"True christianity" as you call it has never existed. Christiantiy has always put its jewish dogma before truth. It has to because if christianity put truth before dogma it would dissolve itself. Way back in nazi germany far smarter people than you and I came to the conclusion that christiantiy has to go if the germanic peoples are to survive. Do you understand why? I do. It is because christianity is filled with jewish thinking. I could make a long thread how the bible and christianity is filled with fucked up middle eastern greasebag thinking but it would be like (chuckle) preaching to the choir here on /pol/. We know and we understand. You do not. You do not belong here nor in an germanic ethnostate because even if your physical shape is that of an european your soul is that of a jew. Enjoy your christian future with your black and brown brothers in faith.


bc1893  No.11988082

>>11987669

Oh gee, I cannot wait for a foreigner from a nation that wasn't only the enemy of mine, but also produces and consumes the most anti good things from ww2 and is also vastly vastly Christian and invested and amiable toward it despite extreme heresy and unchristian genital mutilation.


320fcf  No.11988122

File: f9a16587ed2bd48⋯.png (21.84 KB, 331x256, 331:256, ClipboardImage.png)

>>11987986

Kek, he also spoke at Nuremburg about the National Socialists wanting to destroy the Church (it appears he claims this was because the Church was allying itself with enemies of the National Socialist regime - deluded to the very end).

>http://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_Vol-XLII.pdf

>Ctrl + F: Cajus Fabricius

>>11988037

Its linked in the image lad.

Its almost like you didn't even bother to read it.

>>11987886

>>11988037

>The wording in those pics make it very clear that this is being written by a source hostile to National Socialism.

And?

>I have to wonder why you're referencing such a source.

Because there's no reason to doubt it in this context and its supported by evidence from elsewhere?

>It's convenient that you didn't identify who they are either.

Its not at all surprising that you expect to be spoonfed.

All I did was Jewgle 'cajus fabricius "1940"' - because I saw that he left the NatSoc party in 1940 and the result was forthcoming, 3rd result.

>https://books.google.com/books?id=RyiCgoA-IYwC&pg=PA60&lpg=PA60&dq=cajus+fabricius+%221940%22&source=bl&ots=xVJO-Gbtuo&sig=77_wsnFhrB05n93Njw2jSM9cKaU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj7jY6u_OLcAhUFMt8KHZ8pDoYQ6AEwCXoECAcQAQ#v=onepage&q=cajus%20fabricius%20%221940%22&f=false

To be fair, I wouldn't trust this John Conway character as far as I can throw him in most cases, but I see nothing to suggest falsehood in his statements in this capacity, and it appears his claims are bolstered by Fabricius' testimony at Nuremburg (which it took me awhile to translate out, but it seems pretty clear he acknowledges an uptick in anti-Christian sentiment within the National Socialist party following promotion of 'Positive Christianity', supporting the view that PC was just a ploy to get Christians to support the movement and move away from the Church).


320fcf  No.11988126

>>11988053

That's a pitiful response to a powerful post.


6dd31f  No.11988137

File: 7e5d2d797bd5112⋯.gif (3.77 MB, 700x700, 1:1, 97b3632b471c29d9dae73b1f41….gif)

File: a986376cfaae47d⋯.png (90.77 KB, 961x696, 961:696, revisionist history faggot.png)

>>11987911

>I (OP) am not Roman Catholic and neither was the author.

It was already suspicious before since the topic is about that book, but you outed yourself as the faggot who was obsessed with trying to alter the context of Positive Christianity in the Christians in Haiti thread.

Thread archive: http://archive.fo/bTsWh#selection-31633.0-31633.37

>First of all, I'm not Roman Catholic.

Almost verbatim. This is going in someone's cringe compilation.

Second image related but there's plenty more in the archived thread. tl;dr for those who only read tl;dr:

This faggot changes IDs multiple times throughout the thread. He was so stumped on Positive Christianity that he dug up the book he posted in the OP of this thread, looked for a passage to throw blame away from christians, and lied about its context in a dishonest attempt to revise history. Then when no one accepted his lies, he accused everyone of being bots. He has an obsession with bots as seen here: >>11987762

Before he broke down and resorted to, ''you're all bots!!1" he constantly made it a habit of deliberately and falsely accusing his opposition of things by lying about what they said. Revisionist history fags are the worst.


e858eb  No.11988144

OP..I am actually really looking forward to reading through your OP and listening to your audio book. This is the reason why I come visit /pol/…to learn. It is nice to see someone post something worth considering rather than the shit slides that have become a non-stop onslaught here.


6dd31f  No.11988148

>>11988144

If you really want to learn you should followup with the author's history and who OP really is because even during the reign of NSDAP it became outdated. Read the thread to know more.


e299f9  No.11988151

>>11987911

>the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of…

>The author talks about you. Perhaps you may wish to hear his arguments.

I am the author of that text. You are not referencing two different people. Stop acting like a schizophrenic.

Also, did you manage to complete reading that entire sentence?

reposted in case you missed it earlier: the christian idea of salvation through jesus christ alone simultaneously denies the importance of race, sexual dichotomy, intelligence, physical health, aptitude, "virtue morality", and everything else that is not jesus christ/trinity.

>>11987911

>he went after a bunch of traitorous Priests which were almost entirely from the territory that Germany reclaimed from Poland. The territory that had been occupied by communists

care to explain this? >>11987764

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Germany

On 22 March 1942, the German Bishops issued a pastoral letter on "The Struggle against Christianity and the Church".[69] The letter … accused the Reich Government of "unjust oppression and hated struggle against Christianity and the Church"

>>11987911

>Who exactly do you suppose has been the primary force promoting the education of logic and reason for the past few thousand years…? In my little church we teach children biblical Greek.

I'll give you a hint: logic is older than the jewish bible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos

Logos (UK: /ˈloʊɡɒs, ˈlɒɡɒs/, US: /ˈloʊɡoʊs/; Ancient Greek: λόγος, translit. lógos; from λέγω, légō, lit. 'I say') is a term in Western philosophy, psychology, rhetoric, and religion derived from a Greek word variously meaning "ground", "plea", "opinion", "expectation", "word", "speech", "account", "reason", "proportion", and "discourse",[1][2] but it became a technical term in philosophy beginning with Heraclitus (c.  535 – c.  475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge.[3] Logos is the logic behind an argument.[4] Logos tries to persuade an audience using logical arguments and supportive evidence. Logos is a persuasive technique often used in writing and rhetoric.

Ancient Greek philosophers used the term in different ways. The sophists used the term to mean discourse; Aristotle applied the term to refer to "reasoned discourse"[5] or "the argument" in the field of rhetoric, and considered it one of the three modes of persuasion alongside ethos and pathos.[6] Stoic philosophers identified the term with the divine animating principle pervading the Universe.


320fcf  No.11988155

>>11988148

What I'd really like to find is what got the guy in trouble, this "Inner Re-armament" thing that got him tossed in a camp.

Anyone able to find a link to a translation?


5b231e  No.11988160

File: 980e140213400ce⋯.jpeg (47.68 KB, 600x623, 600:623, what are you doing.jpeg)

>>11987781

>>11987764

>>11988151

>all these jewpedia links


e858eb  No.11988162

>>11987796

Why do you post these shitty images; I literally have to hide them because they are so revolting! I hate porn, but these leave me with a visceral feeling of disgust.


320fcf  No.11988165

>>11988160

To be fair, Jewpedia is a fine source if you go into it knowing its largely controlled by Zionists, meaning you need to pay attention to the sources cited and be wary of statements clearly indicative of author bias.


320fcf  No.11988171

File: df0dd9e8ff6bb91⋯.jpg (106.94 KB, 724x1040, 181:260, African Church Family.JPG)

File: d7dd91f81ac5877⋯.jpg (259.98 KB, 2465x814, 2465:814, Find a nice Christian girl.JPG)

File: 30dcadaeb89622b⋯.jpg (195.31 KB, 2051x1070, 2051:1070, American Christianity in O….JPG)

File: 484829d76e86472⋯.png (41.44 KB, 560x323, 560:323, Christianity - Demographic….png)

>>11988162

That's very unChristian of you.


5b231e  No.11988172

>>11988165

I mean yeah, I use it for a large variety of non-political topics.


e858eb  No.11988176

>>11988171

Revolting. You can't be a follower of christ and a 'christian' at the same time.


320fcf  No.11988201

>>11988172

I use it for political topics too - its great for identifying your enemies narratives and the flaws therein. I would know so much less about the holohoax being a hoax if it weren't for wikiJews articles and sources cited.

>>11988176

I don't see the appeal in being a follower of Christ to be honest.

All bantz aside, I see Jesus as one of the most Jewish figures in history - he's a subversive rabbi who went about attempting to subvert the Jewish hegemony (his own peoples hegemony) in order to gain himself more personaly power, all the while claiming himself the sole earthly embodiment of the sole divinity in all of existence, as the product of what can only be described as 'divine cuckoldry'.

And whats more, as addressed in a previous post, his ideals were awful, amounted to a fucking anti-materialist death cult, claiming this life was basically just a test to see if you were worthy of the 'real life' in Heaven after you die, which is extremely unappealing to me conceptually… Frankly, the only thing I can see having made Christianity appealing initially was that exact aspect, coupled with all the talk of 'equality before God' and such, which I can totally see appealing to the lowest common denominator, just as we see with progressive-liberals making the same sort of talking points today and appealing to the same dregs.

He reminds me of Martin Luther King in a lot of respects, now that I think of it.


6dd31f  No.11988215

>>11988155

It sounds juicy, and directly contradicts OP's attempt to paint Cajus Fabricius as a neutral observer of Positive Christianity. Even the part as seen in the archived thread, Cajus Fabricius was noticing that other christians were complaining about the rise of heathenism/paganism. Considering that Cajus Fabricius eventually reached the same conclusion a few years after that book came out, Inner Re-armament reiterating that same conclusion, it would be the antithesis to the book OP posted and from the same author.


320fcf  No.11988217

>>11988201

On top of that, I just want to say, I don't dislike Christians themselves, I can respect that they're trying to carry on what they interpret to be a traditional manner within their tribe… But Christianity itself is poison, and I can't help but look at Christians much the same way I look at cuckservative civnat-espousing GOP supporters in the US: they've tied themselves to a wagon that is slowly sinking into the mud, and they keep telling themselves that this was some sort of mistake and they just need to find a way to get the wagon out of the mud and everything will be fine, but they continually fail to realize that the men driving the wagon, motivated by the words of Jesus Christ, without any maligning of his words, drove that cart into the mud on purpose and keep it there on purpose as well.


320fcf  No.11988229

>>11988215

>It sounds juicy, and directly contradicts OP's attempt to paint Cajus Fabricius as a neutral observer of Positive Christianity.

I wouldn't necessarily go that far, but I would love to see what the contents represent.

>Even the part as seen in the archived thread, Cajus Fabricius was noticing that other christians were complaining about the rise of heathenism/paganism. Considering that Cajus Fabricius eventually reached the same conclusion a few years after that book came out, Inner Re-armament reiterating that same conclusion, it would be the antithesis to the book OP posted and from the same author.

Okay yeah, I can't really argue with that.

The Nuremburg stuff also seems to support that conclusion, that he looked around and realized this was going on and tried to support a reinvigoration of Christendom in NatSoc Germany and internalized the interpretation that the opposition to Christendom in Germany at the time came about as the result of the Church(s) aligning themselves with Communists and the like, and wound up in a concentration camp as a perceived subversive.


e858eb  No.11988237

>>11988201

Jesus wasn't jewish. Do you really think that 'good fruit' comes from 'bad' trees. The jews declared he wasn't jewish, he declared he wasn't jewish…the romans didn't think he was jewish. Nobody thinks he is jewish except you and the majority of misled christianity.


5d8003  No.11988240

>>11988201

From an secular point of view, the redemption archetype is incredibly important for civilization to exist in order to build and maintain it as well to become aware one's dark side. To forgive debts, including blood debts and to stop endless cycles of debauchery.

The Heavenly All-Father: Justice

The Son: Redemption

The Spirit: Knowledge

These three gods have been with Whites since recorded history, they're even in Odinism.


5d8003  No.11988247

>>11988240

to build trust*


e299f9  No.11988250

>>11987784

>http://biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

>For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.

>>11987911

>You're engaging in eisegetical cherry picking.

>Read Romans from start to finish in one sitting and it will make more sense.

>It doesn't mean what you think it means.

What do you think "For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings." means?


320fcf  No.11988252

>>11988237

>Jesus wasn't jewish.

Yeah, he was.

>Do you really think that 'good fruit' comes from 'bad' trees.

That implies you think I think Jesus was 'good fruit', which I don't, as I've already expressed in the very comment to which you were replying.

I don't know how else I'm supposed to interpret your commentary in light of this fact, aside from suggesting you didn't read anything I had to say and are just spewing your cult rhetoric as is so common of your kind.

>The jews declared he wasn't jewish,

Proof? Also, I don't actually care, because Jews can't 'declare' someone non-Jewish - and why WOULD they unless he was Jewish to start? That's like a bunch of Whites declaring a nigger non-White, it makes no sense.

>he declared he wasn't jewish

Proof? See above.

>the romans didn't think he was jewish.

Proof? See above.

>Nobody thinks he is jewish except you and the majority of misled christianity.

Nah m8, everyone thinks he's Jewish, and so did Hitler.


320fcf  No.11988258

>>11988240

>From an secular point of view, the redemption archetype is incredibly important for civilization to exist in order to build and maintain it as well to become aware one's dark side. To forgive debts, including blood debts and to stop endless cycles of debauchery.

We already had such insight in our own ideology, there was no need of it from Christianity.

>These three gods have been with Whites since recorded history, they're even in Odinism.

<Christianity is secretly based European paganism!

Nah m8, Europeans - like most people who adopt Christianity in the wake of their native faiths being trampled by the Jew-worshippers - certainly added aspects of their faith onto this one, but Christianity being meaningfully associative with Odinism is just kind of a sad cop-out.

Whatever, if you want to believe that tripe, that's on you.


320fcf  No.11988264

>>11988250

>trying to argue scriptural interpretation with a cultist

Come on now Anon, you know you're just going to get some long-winded rant about 'context' and urging you to 'read the whole section' or some other tripe as they always wheel out when it comes down to being faced with promotion of blatantly-undesirable behaviors within Biblical works.


ad8810  No.11988277

>multiple pro or against religion threads pop up on multiple sites on the same day after weeks of no religious D&C

>they all have plenty of (1)s

Keep track, Anons. They rotate their topics.


e299f9  No.11988293

>>11988277

>"muh religious D&C"

do you think hitler expelling jews from germany was "religious D&C"?


320fcf  No.11988295

>>11988277

Anon, there's a religion thread on /pol/ basically every day.


ad8810  No.11988308

>>11988293

>>11988295

I'm just keeping aware of patterns. Religious D&C comes and goes in extremely distinct waves, and we've had a lull for a couple weeks. Suddenly multiple imageboards start getting threads about it. I browse halfchan on my phone on the shitter and it's particularly bad over there; I saw a thread in the past 12 hours which was no more articulate than "paganism is dumb" stretched into a paragraph.


919c74  No.11988323

File: 4562b4f5b4c9558⋯.jpg (497.98 KB, 664x1415, 664:1415, German Church 1.jpg)

File: 1993c31c1beb2e0⋯.jpg (1.93 MB, 2592x1408, 81:44, German Church 2.jpg)

File: db218975921e9e8⋯.jpg (1.89 MB, 2592x1392, 54:29, German Church 3.jpg)

File: 7951f1439a86db5⋯.jpg (1.91 MB, 2600x1400, 13:7, German Church 4.jpg)

File: bef9ba69ad0618b⋯.jpg (1.37 MB, 1968x1384, 246:173, German Church 5.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988344

>>11988323

Nice, might as well post the scans I have, they are in german, untranslated.


0e3182  No.11988352

File: 32bfff9c730a3fe⋯.jpg (2.63 MB, 1912x3115, 1912:3115, 1.jpg)

File: 8eb38cf297421ca⋯.jpg (215.74 KB, 800x618, 400:309, 2.jpg)

File: 0ecf57ae3b13283⋯.jpg (191.09 KB, 800x484, 200:121, 3.jpg)

File: b8a9bb775a3e59e⋯.jpg (249.17 KB, 578x800, 289:400, 4.jpg)

File: a936a1fa7bafaa1⋯.jpg (255.02 KB, 577x800, 577:800, 5.jpg)

War Jesus Jude?

Artur Dinter 1934

Pages 29 and 30 are missing!


0e3182  No.11988356

File: 912540d79567b2d⋯.jpg (315.94 KB, 576x800, 18:25, 7.jpg)

File: 1844e4e277faa67⋯.jpg (279.76 KB, 495x800, 99:160, 8.jpg)

File: 4e54bad1f3493f8⋯.jpg (292.45 KB, 505x800, 101:160, 9.jpg)

File: 042afeaa4bd6083⋯.jpg (286.56 KB, 509x800, 509:800, 10.jpg)

File: 822dcc6d795cda2⋯.jpg (280.42 KB, 496x800, 31:50, 11.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988357

File: 2d3f91c9c209fbd⋯.jpg (285.67 KB, 491x800, 491:800, 12.jpg)

File: ac90713d64405c0⋯.jpg (286.13 KB, 503x800, 503:800, 13.jpg)

File: 31edf67c242fed8⋯.jpg (298.9 KB, 502x800, 251:400, 14.jpg)

File: 1243e35023df670⋯.jpg (282.57 KB, 486x800, 243:400, 15.jpg)

File: 3e77b9c34f3c923⋯.jpg (289.59 KB, 517x800, 517:800, 16.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988359

File: fa6a3f2c7c43396⋯.jpg (291.4 KB, 498x800, 249:400, 17.jpg)

File: 4d472f418d89d7e⋯.jpg (285.37 KB, 515x800, 103:160, 18.jpg)

File: e9c2f419065508a⋯.jpg (281.96 KB, 491x800, 491:800, 19.jpg)

File: d8bdc714eba85ee⋯.jpg (287.35 KB, 502x800, 251:400, 20.jpg)

File: be0cb7f104132b4⋯.jpg (286.28 KB, 498x800, 249:400, 21.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988363

File: 884034fa8112b13⋯.jpg (283.36 KB, 506x800, 253:400, 22.jpg)

File: 62b4b508b9a3e2e⋯.jpg (281.86 KB, 501x800, 501:800, 23.jpg)

File: 8272f846c60db7e⋯.jpg (153.73 KB, 486x786, 81:131, 24.jpg)

File: 92e0ba354b9203b⋯.jpg (280.99 KB, 489x800, 489:800, 25.jpg)

File: 884a775214915a9⋯.jpg (279.72 KB, 502x800, 251:400, 26.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988368

File: 8313e64a065c8fd⋯.jpg (281.73 KB, 496x800, 31:50, 27.jpg)

File: 2afd219e53baad9⋯.jpg (293.94 KB, 511x800, 511:800, 28.jpg)

File: f3f467e99ca881e⋯.jpg (3.02 MB, 1936x3097, 1936:3097, 31.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988377

File: 98856942d99402e⋯.jpg (422.48 KB, 1197x1600, 1197:1600, 3.jpg)

File: 4aa4f0e003314d6⋯.jpg (511.7 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 4.jpg)

File: 04896185e5c32b3⋯.jpg (629.26 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 5.jpg)

File: 6784731f8d8f15c⋯.jpg (596.93 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 6.jpg)

File: a7de5e99cbb0568⋯.jpg (598.57 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 7.jpg)

Was Jesus a Jew?

Jesus in light of the Racial Question

1934


0e3182  No.11988378

File: dcc172373a8ec19⋯.jpg (583.82 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 8.jpg)

File: 8bc2aadc4bc8d6e⋯.jpg (601.82 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 9.jpg)

File: f85d8d3a1db4fba⋯.jpg (593.51 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 10.jpg)

File: 49524f0ef695519⋯.jpg (594.11 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 11.jpg)

File: 586520eacb50fa3⋯.jpg (598.25 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 12.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988381

File: 09e9f20062d8a2a⋯.jpg (592.36 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 13.jpg)

File: a7d6aadddcd96ae⋯.jpg (608.97 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 14.jpg)

File: 31aaa153ed0a51b⋯.jpg (601.31 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 15.jpg)

File: d28853e4d1d691c⋯.jpg (602.39 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 16.jpg)

File: 870d43e6ee007a0⋯.jpg (577.03 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 17.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988382

File: 034a1595bde4052⋯.jpg (588.56 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 18.jpg)

File: bad087fb8f84bb2⋯.jpg (582.95 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 19.jpg)

File: 51da698b7affaa7⋯.jpg (594.73 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 20.jpg)

File: 301471e8f387729⋯.jpg (603.19 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 21.jpg)

File: 5667c183f971940⋯.jpg (560.98 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 22.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988384

File: d57aceeea7e2c36⋯.jpg (592.53 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 23.jpg)

File: 95c755e060af538⋯.jpg (577.44 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 24.jpg)

File: 6450c1e341f781d⋯.jpg (598.58 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 25.jpg)

File: ff53314fdd611b0⋯.jpg (588.83 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 26.jpg)

File: a1b27a0de18578d⋯.jpg (572.15 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 27.jpg)


0e3182  No.11988385

File: c0a6705b8fcd7ee⋯.jpg (509.19 KB, 1200x1600, 3:4, 28.jpg)

FIN


e299f9  No.11988415

>>11988323

>The German Church Situation

>By Gerald B. Winrod, D. D.

>D. D.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_of_Divinity

In the United States, the degree is generally conferred honoris causa by a church-related college, seminary, or university to recognize the recipient's ministry-orientated accomplishments.[4] For example, Martin Luther King (who received a PhD in systematic theology from Boston University in 1955) subsequently received honorary Doctor of Divinity degrees from the Chicago Theological Seminary (1957), Boston University (1959), Wesleyan College (1964), and Springfield College (1964).[5] Billy Graham (who received honorary Doctor of Divinity degrees from The King's College and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) was regularly addressed as "Dr. Graham", though his highest earned degree was a Bachelor of Arts degree in anthropology from Wheaton College.[6][7]

Under federal law, a 1974 judgement accepted expert opinion that an Honorary Doctor of Divinity is a strictly religious title with no academic standing.

In a 1976 interview with Morley Safer of the TV newsmagazine 60 Minutes, Universal Life Church founder Kirby J. Hensley professed that the church's honorary Doctor of Divinity degree was "…just a little piece of paper. And it ain't worth anything, you know, under God's mighty green Earth—you know what I mean?—as far as value."[10] In 2006, Universal Life Church minister Kevin Andrews advised potential degree recipients not to misrepresent the title as an educational achievement to employers, recommending instead that it would be appropriate to list such credentials "under the heading of Titles, Awards, or Other Achievements" on curricula vitae.[11]


e858eb  No.11988445

>>11988252

They are wrong (16) but you do like to talk…I have covered this before and I honestly don't really care all that much what other people think (you have already made up you are spewing such ignorant claptrap, and I don't mean that as an insult…it is just the most basic bitch propaganda that glosses over the entire struggle for power that I have come to expect from basically what amounts to a shill trying to obfuscate history with even more shilling [it actually qualifies as worse shilling than the typical jewish shilling]). He was the grandson of Herod via Herod's first wife Dolores, not a jew. This was a struggle between two powerful regent households of Judea for control of the region. Again, just because someone is 'king of the jews' doesn't make him a jew…for the reverse see the 'queen of england' who is a jew foreigner ruling over Brits. Anyway…talking with you is a complete waste of my time because you are too deep in the shill propaganda. B O R I N G!


63b93c  No.11988482

>>11988036

>anyone who thinks that Christianity aint the best thing since sliced bread is a paid shill

T. Yawn/REPORTED FOR INTL faggot


783ef3  No.11988487

>>11987669

another day, another shitty (((christianity))) thread


63b93c  No.11988507

>>11988445

>hes king of the jews

>he isn't a jew

This is your brain on CI


e858eb  No.11988533

>>11988507

I have spent years researching and reading on the politics and internal struggles of that era around Rome and dealing the the Jewish international bankers overthrowing of the Roman Empire and by extension Europe.

You are so hopelessly ignorant that you think my research is based in CI; not much else to say about this issue to you.


84f952  No.11988554

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

I'll just leave this here


63b93c  No.11988567

>>11988533

>act like a cancerous faggot

>get butthurt when you get treated like one

yeah…


0c8e27  No.11988580

File: f64d35452966b87⋯.png (180.48 KB, 450x600, 3:4, Ugly-05.png)

>>11988487

It's the easiest way to filter jews. You fucktards can't resist kvetching about the homeless guy who warned gentiles about your infinite faggotry and cursed you to hell forever.


63b93c  No.11988584

>>11988580

Yeah, Uncle Adolf was pretty cool.


0c8e27  No.11988599

>>11988584

> Told he was getting filtered for being a snipdick

< Replies

I take it back, you're not a jew. An IQ65 bumblefuck of this caliber is clearly a nigger with some jew ancestry.


63b93c  No.11988602

>>11988599

>cant read ids

>doesn't get sarcasm

German/Dutch mutt btw


783ef3  No.11988603

>>11988580

>he homeless guy who warned gentiles

at least you admit that rabbi yeshua was a kike

now commit suicide for worshipping a foreskin eating satanic deity


e858eb  No.11988614


783ef3  No.11988617

>>11988614

keep worshipping molech you satanic faggot


63b93c  No.11988632

>>11988620

T. Yawn/REPORTED FOR INTL


e858eb  No.11988677

File: dff3c2d8b268377⋯.jpg (158.58 KB, 850x446, 425:223, hitler quote mein kampf.jpg)

If any of you JEW FAGGOTS answer me, I will filter you.

>>11987669

OP help me out here, do you consider yourself to be a National Socialist Christian? I am listening to the book and considering it. I am on part 1; recording three.

What are the benefits in your mind of having a church tradition if the churches history in Europe has been one of absolute brutality towards the European people (100 million Ethnic Europeans murdered during the Roman States/International banking/Jew/Semitic/Homosexual Occult Theocracy occupation of Europe)? How do you think this has helped Europeans? Is it really just as simple as a eugenics program where these people need to be tortured to death and slaughtered to achieve a certain 'product' (this is a serious question on my part and I feel one worth considering)? We have advanced much from who we were in Roman times and this gives me a pause to consider the ideology of evolutionary pressure (be it artificial) upon the whole nation as opposed to something like the Jew PARASITE ideology that is void of growth, creativity or evolutionary advancement.

I am sort of stuck here, but I am interested in your opinion since this issue seems important to you…It is a bit like looking at a man eating lion and thinking that it would be cool to bring it home with you and keep it around your kids or grandkids because should they become injured (broken arm, sprained ankle) at some point they are fair game for the lion due to inherent weakness.


9302a0  No.11988684

Understands it all, has to deal with more than just shitposters on an image board because of stuff other than just

lol Dutch/German mutt.


9302a0  No.11988694

Still doesn’t get it. Lays out weak traps in efforts to fish. Doesn’t find the irony in calling me low intelligence. Has shitposters chasing him across the country.

Has degenerates suggesting I am interested in men. Wearing this shirt because it keeps the demons out of my ass.


63b93c  No.11988695

>>11988684

>incoherence

>>11988685

>doesn't deny being that obnoxious faggot.

Christianity is crap. It is literally judaism for goyim.


63b93c  No.11988701

>>11988694

Oh, it is a bot

10001 001001 010110 1010101010 010101010

00101


ab25e2  No.11988703

>>11988695

>you have to reply to my loaded questions because I say so

I don’t have to reply people who rape children, no.


63b93c  No.11988711

>>11988703

You are probably mega upset that you cant report me for /intl/, right?


9e1816  No.11988721

File: f16c69ae0306104⋯.png (44.1 KB, 1186x1374, 593:687, tr4jweq.png)

If Christianity is a White only religion then why most of its followers are non-White? Why a large portion of Apefrica is Christian if Christianity is for White people only?


ab25e2  No.11988725

>>11988711

>can’t

lol

>upset

Project harder, child rapist.


000000  No.11988731

>>11988721

simple. Because those based Christians in Africa will be your new rulers in the new world. After all, just read Revelations. If you fulfill certain conditions, you get crowns, possessions, names, etc. (surprised such things matter in a supposed Heaven, but you get the point).


63b93c  No.11988735

>>11988725

No wrongthink bans allowed.

Also, I don't have a drop of kike in me, I just see that Christianity is too far gone to be saved, and white people cant share a religion with nonwhites. Stay mad.


e299f9  No.11988736

>>11988533

>the Jewish international bankers overthrowing of the Roman Empire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I

Theodosius I (Latin: Flavius Theodosius Augustus;[1] Greek: Θεοδόσιος Αʹ; 11 January 347 – 17 January 395), also known as Theodosius the Great, was Roman Emperor from AD 379 to AD 395, as the last emperor to rule over both the eastern and the western halves of the Roman Empire.

Between 389–392 he promulgated the "Theodosian decrees"[37] (instituting a major change in his religious policies),[38]:116 which removed non-Nicene Christians from church office and abolished the last remaining expressions of Roman religion by making its holidays into workdays, …, closed Roman temples, confiscated temple endowments and disbanded the Vestal Virgins.[39]

Theodosius refused to restore the Altar of Victory in the Senate House, as asked by non-Christian senators.

In 392 he became sole emperor (the last one to claim sole and effective rule over an empire including the western provinces). From this moment till the end of his reign in 395, while non-Christians continued to request toleration,[40][41] he ordered, authorized, or at least failed to punish, the closure or destruction of many temples, holy sites, images and objects of piety throughout the empire.[42][43][44][45][46][47]

He is likely to have disbanded the ancient Olympic Games, whose last record of celebration was in 393, though archeological evidence indicates that some games were still held after this date.[50]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honorius_(emperor)

Honorius (Latin: Flavius Honorius Augustus; 9 September 384 – 15 August 423) was Western Roman Emperor from 393 to 423. He was the younger son of emperor Theodosius I and his first wife Aelia Flaccilla, and brother of Arcadius, who was the Eastern Emperor from 395 until his death in 408. During his reign, Rome was sacked for the first time in almost 800 years.[1]


000000  No.11988741

>>11987669

>christian shilling again

Yeah, yeah we know. Hitler tried to bring Catholics and Protestants into National Socialism. Catholics rejected it which disappointed Hitler, but Protestants were receptive to it until Hitler suggested that they should get rid of the Old Testament since it was basically a kike text. At that point Hitler realized that Christians couldn't be trusted to protect and preserve the Volk since they would always chose their Semitic faith over their own people.

>>11987686

>>11987711

>>11988036

>>11988041

>>11988053

>>11988620

>>11988685

>>11988703

>>11988725

9 posts of garbage. Someone's titties are twisted.


6f26a4  No.11988746

>>11988721

>why are most of it's followers nonwhite

Those aren't Christians.

Those are negroids larping as Christian with kike plants in Catholicism positions of power supporting them.


000000  No.11988755

>>11988746

>Whites adopt Semitic religion

>This is not larping

>White Christians spread Christianity to muds

>The muds are larping

Ooooookay.


869b4a  No.11988757

>it would be like (chuckle) preaching to the choir here on /pol/.

>We know and we understand. You do not.

WE WUZ KANGS

>You do not belong here nor in an germanic ethnostate because

Because I narrated a book that disagrees with you that was written by an actual National Socialist, of which you are not.

>Enjoy your christian future with your black and brown brothers in faith.

QUICK, CONFLATE CHRISTIANITY WITH MULTICULTURALISM!

>>11988126

>That's a pitiful response to a powerful post.

To whom would it be considered powerful? It certainly wouldn't be meaningful to any so-called "christcucks", but then that's not who the post was for, now was it?

>>11988122

Your true source appears to be copypasta from

https://appeasement.blog/downplaying-nazi-crimes/

That page references as source for its claim regarding Fabricius as

>John S. Conway (2001), “The Nazi Persecution of the Churches, 1933-45,” Regent College Publishing, Vancouver.

For future reference, please give me the name of the book instead of a google link.

>To be fair, I wouldn't trust this John Conway character as far as I can throw him in most cases, but I see nothing to suggest falsehood in his statements in this capacity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_S._Conway_(historian)

You… See nothing to suggest… Falsehood…

>He was the founding member of the Scholars' Conference on the German Church and the Holocaust

So he was a founding member of an organization that pushes the Holocaust narrative, but you're going to take him at face value? And I'm still waiting on the source of the text in the images in >>11987986

>Fabricius' testimony at Nuremburg

Nuremburg, where testimonies were obtained by torture? You consider this credible?

>which it took me awhile to translate out

Oh, so you speak German. Good. Please share with us your rough translation, as well as the text you were working from.

>supporting the view that PC was just a ploy to get Christians to support the movement and move away from the Church

Except if you actually listened to the book, you'd know that there was no attempt made to establish a state church, unlike what the Jewish propaganda claims on nearly every mainstream website I've looked at regarding Positive Christianity. That raises the question, if there was no state church, then what exactly were people being drawn to? The abstract blob of paganism? Is that what motivated German soldiers as they marched into Allied fire?

>>11988137

>Revisionist history fags are the worst.

You must hate CODOH.

https://codoh.com/

>>11988151

>care to explain this?

>On 22 March 1942, the German Bishops issued a pastoral letter on "The Struggle against Christianity and the Church".[69] The letter … accused the Reich Government of "unjust oppression and hated struggle against Christianity and the Church"

>German Bishops

The answer is in your reference.

>I am the author of that text.

I was referring to the book that I narrated. You know that already though. You are exemplary of Hitler's words:

>The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again.


869b4a  No.11988758

>>11988162

>Why do you post these shitty images;

>these leave me with a visceral feeling of disgust.

That's the point.

>>11988215

>OP's attempt to paint Cajus Fabricius as a neutral observer of Positive Christianity.

I did no such thing. He's emphatically pro-Positive Christianity and pro-National Socialism. That's not neutral.

>Cajus Fabricius was noticing that other christians were complaining about the rise of heathenism/paganism

Yeah, no. You're misrepresenting the author. He recognized that there were a few aristocratic types promoting various pagan "folk-religions" to become the new German religion, but he doesn't even begin to imply that they're a significant force. To the contrary:

>And if there should still be a few individuals in Germany today, who with regard to this point prefer to swim in the old channel of the last era, scoffing at priests and devout people after the manner of Marxist free-thinkers, looking askance at anyone professing to be a Christian, even preventing him perhaps from attending public worship, and looking upon-the clergy of a Christian Church as second-rate citizens, then it is a sign that such people have not yet grasped the significance of the new era and are rather to be considered as a grave menace to the peace and inner strength of the German Volk.

>These facts require constant reiteration in the full light of publicity, not only for the sake of the matter itself, but also because we know that in other countries the enemies of new Germany are busily engaged in spreading slanderous reports as to how Germany is in the thralldom of paganism, and that Christians are being persecuted by the State for their Faith's sake.

Both of these quotes are from Part 1, II. (Chapters 2 and 3 respectively.)

>>11988277

>religious D&C

You think I took the time to record an audio book just to make a D&C thread? If I were getting paid, that would be an awful return on investment.


869b4a  No.11988764

>>11988757

Whoops… First thing I was replying to >>11988072


0c8e27  No.11988769

>>11988721

Christianity is an IQ 100+ exclusive religion, which leaves out the majority of people, but especially non-whites. For example, you think Protestantism and Catholicism are Christianity despite having no resemblance to the source material. So IQ-wise, because you demonstrate a lack of basic logic skills and literacy, you are practically a nigger and would therefore have no place in Christianity.


63b93c  No.11988779

>Protestantism and Catholicism are Christianity

What is Christianity then? This always descends into the circular "not real Christianity" horseshit

don't know if you filtered me or not.


63b93c  No.11988780

>>11988779

*aren't christianity


9e1816  No.11988782

File: 4edff1195629b62⋯.jpg (141.36 KB, 600x560, 15:14, true christianity.jpg)

>>11988746

They very much are, at least to the vast majority of churches out there. I guess real Christianity has never been tried either.


000000  No.11988786

>>11987842

>>11987882

>>11988050

>>11988580

>>11988599

>>11988769

This is what high IQ chirstposting looks like.

>>11988779

Whatever is floating around in his high IQ brain that he can't articulate or demonstrate as existing in the world.


000000  No.11988793

>>11988769

>Christianity

>pure appeal to authority religion

>OT is 1001 Tales of Arabian Nights Part 2

>NT is Aesop's Fables in a new form

Indeed. 100+ IQ only. After all, a religion created by a group whose IQ is around 80-90 IQ on average must have a requirement of 100+ IQ.


bf21ef  No.11988798

>>11988746

>Those are negroids larping as Christian with kike plants in Catholicism positions of power supporting them.

And protestants

And evangelicals

And baptists

And episcopalians

And orthodox

And pentecostals

And anglicans

wew its like all christian denominations want non-whites to replace the white people who propped up their churches for over 1000 years, fought their wars, built up their institutions and filled their coffers and are now just replacing them just like the politicians of modern days as if their goals are the same or something


e858eb  No.11988805

>>11988758

> He recognized that there were a few aristocratic types promoting various pagan "folk-religions" to become the new German religion, but he doesn't even begin to imply that they're a significant force.

Do you think that religion can be imprinted on a people or must it be compatible with their existing culture/value construct to be viable?

Have you considered that there is no way for a 'foreign' religion to occupy a people unless it is compatible with their DNA/Brain structure/culture?

Perhaps this is the real reason for genociding the European peoples, no matter how often they try to imprint their filth, it simply doesn't take…thus we are incompatible with their jew world order on a genetic basis. Just curious. This is one of the arguments that I use in reverse when it comes to the ETHNO-GLOBE or the genocide of all jew manufactured (part nigger races) as well as other races that are not compatible with European culture. It is the only way out of continuous conflict and predation for our people.


63b93c  No.11988822

>>11988812

>>11988816

>>11988819

>so butthurt he tripleposts

STAY MAD


5d8003  No.11988835

>>11988554

9/11

That guy has a pretty high power level, with the passing down of the blessings and the two creation stories. The Noah story is the reason Whites are refereed to as Caucasians.

>>11988779

Mormonism. Only ones that know Whites are real chosen ones, America is holy land and that the jews did in fact murder Jesus.

All other creeds are abominations that cast their pearls before swine.


000000  No.11988838

>>11988835

>mormonism

I've seen non-whie mormons in my travels, so pray tell why it's still believed to be a white religion.


63b93c  No.11988850

>>11988835

Mormonism is one of the few denominations that will stay mostly white. (the polygamy is also good for our birthrates) but

>>11988838

has a point, they are starting to convert mestizos en masse, and intermarriage will probably follow. The Mormon church needs to do something about this soon, or it will be facing the same problems the other denominations do.


869b4a  No.11988855

>>11988741

>Hitler suggested that they should get rid of the Old Testament

Source. The author doesn't appear to support your claim.

>But in passing another misconception must be removed. This refers to the relationship between Christianity and Judaism. Long before the rise of National Socialism there were certain national, literary circles amongst the Intelligentsia of the upper middle classes of pre-war days, who, for the sake of their German nationality believed it necessary to reject Christianity as being historically connected with Judaism. On the appearance of National Socialism and its attacks on the Jewish supremacy in our Volk, these Intelligentsia thought the moment had arrived for a similar attack on Christianity.

>>11988215

Oh and I found the specific passage I was looking for. From Part 2, III ch.1:

>A philosophy little suited to the heroic spirit is the shallow optimism found in free-thinkers. This has not grown out of the heroic battle of life, but has had its being in the quiet rooms of learned men, and is suited to contented, comfortable citizens who perform their daily round of duties, and move along in the old rut without any great exertion on their part.

When he talks about "free-thinkers", he's loosely referencing both pagans and atheists… Those with liberalistic attitudes towards religion.

>>11988805

>Do you think that religion can be imprinted on a people or must it be compatible with their existing culture/value construct to be viable?

You didn't think through that argument very well. Take a look at the statistics for religion by country. The whiter the country, the more Christian it is. As Europeans decline, so too does Christianity. Direct correlation.


0c8e27  No.11988860

>>11988779

>Hurr durr how do written documents with a precise pattern for acceptable and unacceptable behavior that can be easily used to compare denominations supposed to work?

I know that niggers get confused by things like archetypes and written criteria, but this is beyond stupid.


e858eb  No.11988866

>>11988838

It is not…that is what UTTERLY turns me off about mormonism…they are as multicult as all the rest, it is ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING. None of them have the proper understanding or wisdom to see that they only way to have paradise on earth is for the complete purging of all other races and the institution of an ETHNO-GLOBE. Europeans are the most beautiful thing this earth has ever produced or ever will. But right, by culture, values and morality it should belong to us alone and no one else.


63b93c  No.11988868

>>11988860

Tell me what Real Christianity (tm) is please.

Tell me why Protestantism and Catholicism are not Christianity.


11c5c4  No.11988883

>>11988850

The Mormon church will NEVER turn away converts. The only thing they'll address in terms of demographics is how to get more dark skins. You're delusional to think otherwise.


bf21ef  No.11988900

>>11988850

mormonism is already an increasingly non-white religion and they keep sending nice white girls to africa to get raped and come back with mulattoes but that's hush hush.


e858eb  No.11988903

>>11988855

>You didn't think through that argument very well

Err, technically it was a question about your opinion…

"There shall be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity."-Rabbi Efrati

My question was about the SOURCE of Christianity and its derivative religions. Is it possible that as the jews are seeking to miscegenate/rape and genocide Europeans is there a possibility that the source of Christianity is within the European/White race's brain as opposed to an outside influence…thus 'judaism' could never be the SOURCE of Christianity…that this was in fact a historic fallacy. Anyway it wasn't a super important though, just a little mind fart.


9e1816  No.11988905

File: 90740b63cf272dd⋯.jpg (61.63 KB, 816x531, 272:177, 2015.jpg)

>>11988855

>As Europeans decline, so too does Christianity.

I don't think so. Christianity is one of the fastest growing religions in the world after all. Hell, in the 1900s most of Africa was non-Christian and now it's almost completely converted. Christianity is rapidly gaining power for itself all around the world, aside from Europe that is which was converted years ago. Christianity is doing fine, it's just Europeans who are in severe decline. Christianity can, is and will exist without Europeans, but Europe without Whites is no Europe at all, and no, based Christian niggers, gooks and spics aren't a substitute for ethnic Europeans no matter how godly they are.


63b93c  No.11988909

I'm waiting, Mr. theological scholar.

>>11988868

>>11988860


e858eb  No.11988916

>>11988905

So you are going with the brain can be plastically molded to any morality/culture that can be conceived and it was just luck of the draw that landed Christianity in Europe's lap?


869b4a  No.11988922

>>11988323

Very nice! A cursory glance indicates that this is reporting on exactly the type of propaganda that Fabricius was talking about in the book. Thank you for sharing. I shall read through it and if it's as good as I suspect it to be, I'll record this as well.

>>11988415

>Under federal law, a 1974 judgement accepted expert opinion that an Honorary Doctor of Divinity is a strictly religious title with no academic standing.

It's not a theological publication, so what's your point? The journalistic value is what matters here.


63b93c  No.11988943

>>11988855

>The whiter the country, the more Christian it is. As Europeans decline, so too does Christianity.

I have read that Christianity is on the RISE in America, thanks to all of the Christian Mestizos coming here. In Europe it is different, because most of their immigrants are muslim.


9e1816  No.11988960

>>11988916

What's our point exactly? Christianity eventually landed in Afirca as well and Apefrica is full of niggers isn't it? It just took it more time due how hostile and inhabitable Africa really is, especially thanks to Negroes living there. Hell, the second country to officially adopt Christianity was black as coal Ethiopia in 330. The first one being suspiciously brown Armenia. They even accomplished it before Rome did. Are you going to WE WUZ as ancient Ethiopians and pretend they were White as well just like your based Jews you love so much? Lithuania was only Christianized in 1382. That's more than 1000 years later after those based Christian niggers in Ethiopia. Are Ethiopians more White than Lithuanians just because they adopted Christianity faster? I guess Christianity was tailor made to accommodate those based Christian nogs in Ethiopia with their special godly brains.


e858eb  No.11988985

File: 110ca6940bfb5c3⋯.jpg (112.64 KB, 1243x859, 1243:859, african flying car why are….jpg)

>>11988960

>just like your based Jews you love so much

What? I am asking questions about the origin of Christianity. I don't think niggers have a soul because they are 1/2 animal (80% of their alleles match chimp alleles) and since jews are their [part animal] offspring they don't have a soul either. I guess I was questioning the idea that 'christianity' came from anything other than the European brain and that it was actually as old as Europeans were and questioning the fact that any other culture could know Christianity…I don't think they can, no matter how they try. It is like expecting them to create something that is not a copy, like the chinky bugs or the niggers…the niggers GIVEN ALL THE BOOKS AND SCHOOLING have absolutely no idea how to recreate a airplane…I'm not talking about INVENTING AN AIRPLANE I am talking about recreating it FROM A BOOK. But you seem to think that these same people have some comprehension of ?christianity?? IDK I am simply having a WTF moment there dude.


2d5b6e  No.11988988

File: 3b1578ab7b61274⋯.jpeg (5.14 KB, 339x149, 339:149, 2018-07-15-20-25-12--1841….jpeg)

>>11988602

Anon said he was filtering kikes, which means you too, you hooknose idiot. Fuck, you retards really are niggerjews. Here's a protip; I'm filtering you dumbshits too, so I'm sure you'll all reply kek


63b93c  No.11988998

>Christianity is so based and strong and redpilled

>but it cant withstand some fucking NEETS on a imageboard criticizing it

kek


2d5b6e  No.11989006

File: cb8bca06191aa4e⋯.jpg (29.98 KB, 397x393, 397:393, 95d72dfa43cdfe94067323e439….jpg)

>>11988909

>Gets told there is a written pattern he can use to compare protestant and catholic religions

<Do all the work for me because nigguhs ain't be reading books n shit nigguh muh fuggah bix nood


ea4f1b  No.11989012

No bloodshed.


63b93c  No.11989020

>>11989006

>anon

>>11988860

>says there is proof for those denominations being heretical

>doesnt provide proof

Who is supposed to be a nigger again?


5d8003  No.11989025

>>11988866

No exoteric missionary religion is pure any race. The only way you can have a racial pure religion is make it esoteric and bloodline only; like Judaism. I think most anons here would love White Talmudism written in Futhark runes.


000000  No.11989036

>>11989025

>talmud

>something that can be appended to continually

>also, fuck 3 and a day year old kids

I get what you're trying to say, but no.


bf21ef  No.11989039

>>11988905

Christianity is growing, expanding and doing so at the cost of europe and europeans, that's how I see it.


9e1816  No.11989058

>>11988985

The origins of Christianity are Jewish as fuck. Jesus Christ was a rabbinic scholar who came into conflict with prominent Jewish religious groups, namely the Pharisees and Sadducees over the differences in interpretation of the Mosaic Law. His earlier followers were all Jews. Most of whom were preaching radical anti-Roman rhetoric as they were still butthurt that gentiles, in that case Romans were occupying their homeland of Judea. Before another mystery meat individual hailing from Armenian Anatolian this time around, Shaul of Tarsus took this religion for a spin, Christianity was almost universally followed by Jews only. He did something that no Jew dared to do before. He opened up and started preaching to gentiles en mass. That was a big no-no for the Jews. They didn't want to share their faith with the gentiles and thus the split between Paulician Christianity and Judaism came to be. Hell, Christianity uses the Original Testament as its backbone to set up the story of Christ later on but the OT was written by ethnic Hebrews and consists of their account detailing their adventures centuries prior. It's kosher as fuck. Without OT there can be no NT and it's just Jewish fairytales.


e858eb  No.11989082

>>11989058

Did you switch IP's because I filtered you? Nice. I can fix that.

I already explained to you why that was incorrect. Just repeatedly hammering at a lie isn't going to make is 'so' in my head.


5d8003  No.11989110

File: 7f4086c29167533⋯.jpg (42.25 KB, 359x500, 359:500, hermanhersay.jpg)

>>11989082

The 'everyone in bible is Judah' is exactly what jews and Cuckinsanity zionists push as well. It's almost like these 'antisemites' are controlled opposition trying to legitimize something. Really makes you think.


e858eb  No.11989145

File: ab016803d94e8f2⋯.jpg (128.95 KB, 736x927, 736:927, lion headed god.jpg)

File: e40b4c8d98af33d⋯.jpg (50.43 KB, 743x746, 743:746, teth symbol.jpg)

File: 81500d28cfe0be5⋯.jpg (30.49 KB, 600x300, 2:1, tengri celtic cross.jpg)

File: 173f7d3c74c29de⋯.jpg (764.48 KB, 2215x3325, 443:665, tefillin mark of the beast.jpg)

>>11989110

It does actually. I have long maintained that when the jews longed to 'make mankind into their own image' that it was a program of dysgenics and mind control that they were following. So they desired to pollute all of humanity with their own 1/2 animal DNA via their black bloodlines.

The mind control came through the idea of 'judaism as parent religion' when it really has nothing to do with Christianity. And the eugenics was their constant incessant urge to mongrelize themselves and fuck everything in sight [its the 'black blood' that run in their veins] which is why they hate European women with such a passion…the least likely of all humanity to race mix or give into their monstrous animal breeding agenda.

So it seems that they would by claiming parentage over humanity and also via mind control with their 'religion' step up to a undeserved position of power among the nations, even though they are really nothing more than 1/2 animal soulless beasts.

I suppose there is a reason why the Teth or symbol of Christianity is the oldest symbol on the planet.

Gives new meaning to the 'mark of the beast' now doesn't it…lel


e299f9  No.11989164

>>11988922

>what's your point? The journalistic value is what matters here.

that author might be misrepresenting himself and/or the contents of his story.

that said, probably not, because plenty of journalists are honest, especially when they are personally invested in the story's subject matter. :^)


e299f9  No.11989241

>>11988757

>You are exemplary of Hitler's words

>The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again.

did you read your own posts?

did you notice how much content from others you "conveniently" did not reply to?

>>11988757

>if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry


e858eb  No.11989247

>>11989164

Why would you give me all that crap on the 'pro rape for European women OP' and then pretend to care about German values here? I really don't understand your motives or your trajectory. Do you?

> Mr :^)


e299f9  No.11989264

>>11989247

>Why would you give me all that crap on the 'pro rape for European women OP'

what are you talking about?


e299f9  No.11989277

>>11989145

>'judaism as parent religion' when it really has nothing to do with Christianity

care to explain this?

http://biblehub.com/niv/deuteronomy/6.htm

Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength. These commandments that I give you today are to be on your hearts. Impress them on your children. Talk about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up. Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads. Write them on the doorframes of your houses and on your gates.

When the Lord your God brings you into the land he swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to give you—a land with large, flourishing cities you did not build, houses filled with all kinds of good things you did not provide, wells you did not dig, and vineyards and olive groves you did not plant—then when you eat and are satisfied, be careful that you do not forget the Lord, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shema_Yisrael

Shema Yisrael (or Sh'ma Yisrael; Hebrew: שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל‬; "Hear, [O] Israel") are the first two words of a section of the Torah, and is the title (better known as The Shema) of a prayer that serves as a centerpiece of the morning and evening Jewish prayer services. The first verse encapsulates the monotheistic essence of Judaism: "Hear, O Israel: the LORD our God, the LORD is one" (Hebrew: שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל יְהוָה אֱלֹהֵינוּ יְהוָה אֶחָֽד׃‬), found in Deuteronomy 6:4, sometimes alternatively translated as "The LORD is our God, the LORD is one." Observant Jews consider the Shema to be the most important part of the prayer service in Judaism, and its twice-daily recitation as a mitzvah (religious commandment). It is traditional for Jews to say the Shema as their last words, and for parents to teach their children to say it before they go to sleep at night.

The term "Shema" is used by extension to refer to the whole part of the daily prayers that commences with Shema Yisrael and comprises Deuteronomy 6:4–9, 11:13-21, and Numbers 15:37–41. These sections of the Torah are read in the weekly Torah portions Va'etchanan, Eikev, and Shlach, respectively.


5d8003  No.11989481

>>11989277 check'd

Is(is)-Ra-El(ohim) existed before they arrived, they basically took it over like Mexicans in LA.

Mosaic law was their religion, not Judaism. Which is a completely invented religion that gets a vast majority of it's traditions from desert pagans and Babylonian legal books. It's actually hilarious how fake Judaism is, all so they could practice usury under Charlemagne and slavery in Spain; it's was the satanism of it's day and just as theologically bankrupt.

>wikipedia

>(((revived herbrew)))

I'd only trust Greek– 'revived hebrew' isn't what it says it is; all the Hebrew artifacts seems talk about pagan religions, only readable by computers or appear out of place, strange. OT was written down in Greek along with the NT, writing it down was forbidden until Jesus came along apparently.

Modern Jews are basically Khazar and Babylonian merchants that took a larp too far so they could get out paying taxes and avoid imprisonment. Heck, the Seal of Solomon was given to them as the symbol for the Zionists movement by the Rothschilds.


000000  No.11989576

>>11988812

>>11988816

>>11988819

This is polvol2.


869b4a  No.11989629

>>11988757

>>11988122

>Fabricius' testimony at Nuremberg

I hope you don't mind, but I went ahead and chased that down. I still stand by what I said, that I would not consider Nuremberg testimony credible since every German there was under duress, but despite this I think there's something to be said for Dr. Fabricius's testimony.

>The people of Germany are and will remain Christian! National Socialism is based on Christian principles. The anti-Christian Freidenkerturn is opposed to National Socialism. B. On the part of the state the following rallies and imperial laws are available:

>1) Government statements of 1.2. and March 21, 1933: "The two great Christian denominations are the most important factors in preserving our popularity. The concern of the Regimg applies to the sincere cooperation between state and church. She sees in Christianity the inexhaustible discovery of the moral and moral life of our people "

>2) Reich Law regarding the establishment of the German Protestant Church of 11.7.1933,

>3) The Reich Concordat with the Roman Catholic Church of July 20, 1933.

>4) The emphasis on the positive Christianity in Hitler's speeches - especially in 1934 and his repeated appeal to the churches to make their moral forces in the people effective.

>5) The Speech of Hitler on January 30, 1939: The churches are not persecuted in Germany. "They receive the financial support they are entitled to. Every state-loyal servant of God" is under my personal protection. "

>6) The Fiihrer's command to all responsible state and party authorities to avoid anything that could worsen the relationship between church and state, Ca 1941

>7) The rating of the Foreign Office against the accusation of official paganism - 1.12.1941

Seems like he still affirms everything he wrote in the book. I will however grant you that, at least officially and for the purposes of Nuremberg, he does testify the following:

>in 1939 I was held in custody for two months because of my fight against Himmler, and in 1940 I was expelled from the party by Bouhler without a party-court procedure.

Clearly this did not put a hamper on his enthusiasm for the party though.

https://www.uni-marburg.de/icwc/dateien/ntvol42.pdf

His testimony starts on page 354


5a1bbb  No.11989638

>>11988960

>It just took more time

Lmao what? Excluding the cape, Christianity was virtually non-existent in SSA until the 19th century and now look at it. Niggers take to Abrahamism like flies to shit. Once SSA opened up they hopped that bandwagon in a hurry.


869b4a  No.11989663

>>11988122

>Kek, he also spoke at Nuremburg about the National Socialists wanting to destroy the Church

>it appears he claims this was because the Church was allying itself with enemies of the National Socialist regime

That's the "opposition party" which is mentioned both in the book and in his testimony at the trials.


6dd31f  No.11989780

>>11988855

>Source. The author doesn't appear to support your claim.

That's because the book was written in 1935 and Hitler did that later. Your book source is outdated. It predates when he got arrested.

You didn't even deny that you were that same fag from the archived thread. You have an agenda to exclusively and selectively use Cajus Fabricius' words to change the context of Positive Christianity.


000000  No.11989785


869b4a  No.11989828

>>11989780

>It predates when he got arrested.

What does him getting arrested have to do with your claim that Hitler suggested getting rid of the old testament? Cite your source. When and where did Hitler suggest this?


d91068  No.11989860

File: bd3bfe80bcf563b⋯.jpg (8.78 KB, 255x251, 255:251, Hitler likes this.jpg)


6dd31f  No.11989873

>>11989828

>What does him getting arrested have to do with your claim that Hitler suggested getting rid of the old testament?

You're deliberately trying to combine both contexts because you're a dishonest revisionist history faggot, which you didn't even deny. You selectively respond to some of the information added to the thread so you can ignore most of what conflicts with what you add. Right now you're responding to me only because I'm calling you out the hardest because of your established history as being dishonest. Cajus Fabricius was arrested after writing Inner Re-armament because he became one of those christians he was talking about in his book that was against what NSDAP stood for. That's why when he was let out he was banned from NSDAP activities. Your next move is to cite that he protested his removal from NSDAP removal because he believed he was doing something good for them to sidestep information presented.

>Cite your source. When and where did Hitler suggest this?

Everything Positive Christianity did Hitler approved. One of the core tennets of Positive Christianity was the removal of the Old Testament, therefore if you weren't intentionally ignoring that you would know this. Removing the old testament from the bible was done to focus on the rewrite of Jesus' story to make him explicitly aryan. This was done so that christians would relearn the Jesus' story as an Aryan versus Jew tale.


b83ee4  No.11989874

File: 5cd91f8ffb84285⋯.jpg (250.11 KB, 517x643, 517:643, 1929-01.jpg)

Listening now. You have a great voice for audiobooks, anon, I hope you decide to do more.


000000  No.11989878

>>11989828

>Nazis attempted to court Protestants into joining a "national church" which would become the "established church" of Germany. However, despite the willingness of Protestant churches to accept much of the Nazi program, many Protestants found that attempt by Nazi sympathizers in the "German Church" to remove the Old Testament was a "bridge too far." This attempt led to the formation of the Pastor's Emergency League by Wilhelm Niemoller and others. (The Holy Reich, p. 164.) The Pastors' Emergency League eventually became the "Confessing Church", which gradually took a more oppositional stance toward the Nazis. Eventually, Hitler gave up on the idea of integrating Protestantism into the Nazi state, although he expressed his disappointment to Niemoller by saying "inwardly stood closer to the Protestant Church" and that he had expected a different attitude from Protestant pastors than from Catholics. (Id., at p. 168.)


6dd31f  No.11989883

>>11989860

>>11989874

Read the thread. OP changed IDs and presents outdated information on Positive Christianity and a selective focus on the author to change the context of Positive Christianity on /pol/.


2be8c2  No.11989901

File: 942e6138ae2e706⋯.jpeg (12.53 KB, 225x225, 1:1, 942e6138ae2e706dae06c053d….jpeg)

>>11987669

>>Positive Christianity

You can smear as much lipstick on this kosher pig as you want and it is still a semitic.

You are a faggot and a shill. You are no better than jews and muslims. If you are white, you are a traitor.


d91068  No.11989937

File: 96506eb266ef1b7⋯.jpg (171.21 KB, 800x1233, 800:1233, natsoc anime girl.jpg)

>>11989883

>OP changed IDs and presents outdated information on Positive Christianity and a selective focus on the author to change the context of Positive Christianity on /pol/.

Noted.

I will research further anon.


e858eb  No.11989976

>>11989277

Do you really think I don't know the Shema? Why do you think I say the things I do about judaism. I know it well that judaism is the bastard child of Farsi (babylonian) Pharisee…Proto phoenician had no 'f' but it had a 'ph' so 'farsi' became 'phar'si' or Pharisee.

My point is that the Teth preexisted all known religions including the Babylonian religion and its bastardized homosexual cult. The Teth is the sign of the Celtic Cross and it is far older than Judaism. So what is the symbolism and history of the cross if it didn't originate with the jew infested Roman government. How old is the religion of Christianity and who is our patriarch? If Jesus was an archetype of our patriarch, who is our patriarch and why is Christ an archetype.

Let's take a little lie the jews tell. They tell the lie that Noah was the 'father of 3 sons' and that the 'three sons' become three peoples. The babylonians which predate judaism say that there were 4 exemplary couples from all of humanity that were preserved in the flood. The White, Red, Yellow and Black (not disgusting bantu but Khoisan black; more than likely the Khoisan are being genocided by their own rape mixing with chimpanzees). All other races are the result of disgusting race mixing. So you wouldn't think this lie would be that big of a deal but in a patriarchal society they weren't even present since their DISGUSTING MONGREL (part nigger) asses hadn't been conceived.

So what does the little LIE do to the people of the Earth whose structure of their brain is geared towards obedience their own patriarchy? It places them in a position of service as offspring to a MONGREL disgusting 1/2 human people. And it is all a lie. The jews aren't our people and they sure as shit aren't our 'patriarch' they are a disgusting mongrel 1/2 animal people with sub saharan african values who STOLE their 'holy scriptures' from Babylon where they were exiled BY THEIR OWN GOD who hated them and sold into captivity.

What are the jewish values according to the OT? Child sacrifice - african values, usury - (parasitism) african values, torture - african values, rape - african values, slavery - african values, genocide - african values, cannibalism and vampirism - african values, incest - african values, homosexuality - african values, circumcision - african values, pedophilia and child rape - african values, and I can prove all of these using the OT…these are all 'jewish values'…they have no correlation in European culture that was not 'brought there' as part of the roman/semitic (perversion) conquest of the European peoples, where all who would not 'be made in the image of semites' was torture and murdered and destroyed (african values again).

This ties back into my query about whether or not a 'religion' can be imposed upon a people (sure at sword point you jews can force yourself upon Europeans) but we will NEVER share your african values because our brains don't work this way…they literally don't process the way your brains process. Not only are you lower in the hierarchy of the patriarchy as bastard 1/2 humans but you are incapable of processing or even understanding our values or thoughts.

The idea that a nigger or shitskin or chinky bug could understand the delicate subtlety, refined morality and culture of the thinking of the European brain is laughable. We literally have NOTHING to do with you and you have absolutely NOTHING to do with us. We don't torture, we abolished slavery, we don't have usury, we don't appreciate homosexuality, we don't like pedophilia, we don't genocide (until now when we know that you are trash DNA)…on and on and on…we are absolutely NOTHING like you…there is NO WAY that any of our religion came out of yours because our brains on a fundamental level do not relate to you, your values, your culture or your ideas. YOU ARE 1/2 NIGGER FOREIGNERS IN OUR NATIONS.

Matthew 7

>21 Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of lawlessness.’…

I could give you more examples but I will stop there.


869b4a  No.11990112

>>11989873

>One of the core tennets of Positive Christianity was the removal of the Old Testament

>Removing the old testament from the bible was done to focus on the rewrite of Jesus' story to make him explicitly aryan.

Cite your source

if you would please. Something contemporaneous from Germany would be nice.

>you're a dishonest revisionist history faggot

So are you admitting that you dislike CODOH and think that the Holohoax happened? I'm going to ignore the rest of what you said because I strongly suspect that John S. Conway is embellishing the Nuremberg testimony given his strong pro-Holohoax disposition. Feel free to throw me a better source for the information if you have one.

>>11989874

Thank you! I'm planning on it.

>>11989878

>The Holy Reich

Author is

<Richard Steigmann-Gall (born 1965) is Associate Professor of History at Kent State University, and was the Director of the Jewish Studies Program from 2004 to 2010.

But wait, there's more.

>In a 2003 review of the book, historian John S. Conway wrote that Steigmann-Gall…

Noticing a pattern here? The co-founder of a pro-Holohoax narrative organization is doing a positive book review for a Director of the Jewish Studies? Hmmmm.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Steigmann-Gall

I can't say for certain, but based upon what I already know, I believe that Steigmann-Gall's book is playing the same sort of Jewish word games in the segment you cited as the prosecution did at the Nuremberg trials with regards to the phrase "final solution." Germany already had an "established German church."

>>11989883

>OP changed IDs

Yes I did. I even noted it >>11987767

Couldn't imagine why you're intent on trying to frame it as dishonesty.


5d8003  No.11990123

I need a redpill on why the Apocrypha was removed from the KJB in 1885. Wisdom of Solomon is a very interesting read, it actually explains a lot.


5ad8eb  No.11990156

OP just wants that heaven, okay?

Gotta have that heaven.

That sweet, sweet heaven Yahweh promised, okay?

Listen, guys, OP knows there's a lot of bullshit.

But he needs that heaven, okay?

Heaven is the most important thing.

OP just wants to have his heaven.

Let OP go to heaven, OK.

Guys, come on, man. Come on, maaaaan.

Don't bust his balls like that man.

Just a little bit of heaven, man.

Why do you have to be like this, man?

Heaven. Heaven. Got to go to heaven. Heaven.

So much betrayal and evil but the chance that Yahwehs promise of heaven will be fulfilled, maaaaan.

Come on, man billions of traitors, sure, but heaven, man.

Let OP go to heaven!

Let OP go to heaven!

Let OP go to heaven!

Heaven!

Yahweh!

Recovery of the soul!

Promised heaven!

Heaven!

Heaven!

Heaven, man, pllllleeeaaaaaaase!

Come on man, you want me to cry here, maaaaan?

Heaven!

Let OP go to heaven!

Heaven! Heaven! Heaven! Heaven!

Nothing else is important! Yahweh said so!

Pllllleeeaaaaaaase!

Heaven, ok?

Heaven!

OP wants to go to heaven…

Heaven…


869b4a  No.11990164

>>11990123

>I need a redpill on why the Apocrypha was removed from the KJB in 1885.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Trent#Canons_and_decrees

They've never been a part of the Protestant canon. Those books were only canonized by Rome in order to try to deal with the Protestant insistence upon Sola Scriptura, since it was generally viewed by Protestants that certain of Rome's doctrines didn't have a scriptural basis within the existing canon. I've never even seen a KJV that included the apocryphal books. I hope that helps.


6dd31f  No.11990185

>>11990112

>if you would please. Something contemporaneous from Germany would be nice.

Laughable. It's your obligation to prove that wrong - one of the main aspects to the Positive Christianity psyop. All you've provided is a book that you did an audiotape for. That's the scope of your research. You don't even accept anything that deviates it even though it's one guy's source.

>So are you admitting that you dislike CODOH and think that the Holohoax happened?

Look how fast you move to lying about what others say.

> I'm going to ignore the rest of what you said

You already ignore what other people say you dishonest faggot.

>>11990112

>Noticing a pattern here? The co-founder of a pro-Holohoax narrative organization is doing a positive book review for a Director of the Jewish Studies? Hmmmm.

Are you really that dishonest that you have to pin the holohoax on one organization and not all jews? Furthermore, this is actually more proof that jews defend christianity. That's an aspect that many christians on /pol/ deny. Jews will defend christianity to give christians a semblance of being persecuted so they have a common struggle against evil nazis.

>>11990112

>Couldn't imagine why you're intent on trying to frame it as dishonesty.

It's what you did in the last thread. It shows consistency.


4b8755  No.11990208

>>11989481

>Is(is)-Ra-El(ohim) existed before they arrived, they basically took it over like Mexicans in LA.

This anon knows what he speaks

>wasn't Israel the promised land to them meaning it was already existing

>They just migrated there with Gods help


869b4a  No.11990309

File: c667ed5f314a1b7⋯.jpeg (977.14 KB, 5616x3744, 3:2, c667ed5f314a1b7f94167f4d4….jpeg)

>>11990185

>It's your obligation to prove that wrong

no u

>Look how fast you move to lying about what others say.

You're not answering my question though. Why won't you define your position? Do you believe that the Holohoax happened? That's the only reason I can think of as to why you're hating on revisionists and insist on citing a "historian" that co-founded a Jewish propaganda organization.


6dd31f  No.11990379

>>11990309

Positive Christianity stumps you. That's why you're trying to pull a narrative out of nowhere to try and break apart the aspect that NSDAP knew the threat that christian traitors posed, how they first gave them a chance, and then ended their leniency when the christians would not give up use of the old testament. You reject the reality of it, and so you have to try and invent restrictions on what information is presented.

>You're not answering my question though. Why won't you define your position? Do you believe that the Holohoax happened? That's the only reason I can think of as to why you're hating on revisionists and insist on citing a "historian" that co-founded a Jewish propaganda organization.

You're only asking this based off of your deliberate misrepresentation of what I was saying. Those are not genuine questions but misdirection. I called you out as a revisionist history faggot because that's what you're doing - >>11988137

So you have to stretch that to include tangents and then accuse me of things, which is consistent with what you did in the Christians in Haiti thread. That's the only reason why you're asking "questions." It has nothing to do with what I said but because I correctly called you out for what you're doing and how I managed to find an archive of the last thread someone made.

If that archive wasn't here, people might believe you more, but it's proof of your real intent: scrub the context of Positive Christianity to nullify its proof of NSDAP's struggles against christian traitors. You tried before, failed, and you're here to try again. You even went as far as making an audiobook of an outdated book by a future christian traitor. Your dishonesty is shown throughout the depths you will go to revise history to alter the context of Positive Christianity.


cb249f  No.11990402

The NSDAP promoting Positive Christianity was to de-kikify Christianity and place it in a pro-white, pro-European framework. If Christianity is made to be that way again, I'll support it 100%. Until then, Christianity, barring some exceptions, can get fucked.


cb249f  No.11990418

>>11987833

The Czech Republic is largely irreligious and is still an overwhelmingly homogeneous nation. Same with Belarus.


cb249f  No.11990424

>>11987842

Can't say that I would oppose having Catholics like Léon Degrelle, though.


869b4a  No.11990430

File: 9ec7e9af4c66893⋯.jpg (35.1 KB, 323x267, 323:267, 1418048321284.jpg)

>>11990379

>the christians would not give up use of the old testament.

You've yet to substantiate the claim that Hitler made a move to remove the old testament.

>You're only asking this based off of your deliberate misrepresentation of what I was saying.

Do you believe that the Holohoax happened?

It's a simple question.


6dd31f  No.11990480

>>11990430

>You've yet to substantiate the claim that Hitler made a move to remove the old testament.

You've yet to substantiate that he didn't. More pressing is that you're setting up the trap to deny this on technicality if someone else did it within the NSDAP like Hans Kerrl or Rosenberg. Because you've limited the scope to only what you allow, anything not within it is cast into doubt - that's how deliberate and dishonest you are. That's why you keep restricting it to something Hitler himself had to do. Your wording gave away your dishonesty. Because removing the old testament is obligatory to Positive Christianity, you're using the jewish tactic of trying to call into question something that is given and de facto and limiting it to be that it's not true if Hitler himself didn't say it or was shown doing it. But the NSDAP did, so that's why you're relying on a jewish trick.

>Do you believe that the Holohoax happened?

>It's a simple question.

This is strangely similar to what polvol2 is doing in the meta thread. Do you really think anyone on /pol/ would promote the holohoax? I'm not and don't believe in jewish hoaxes. But you're trying to establish one by cutting the context of Positive Christianity to remove any element that proves that NSDAP struggled against christian traitors. You're done trying to prove your narrative because your audiobook was supposed to be the focal point in this thread and it's not.


000000  No.11990587

>>11990430

see this:

>>11989878

>inb4 he ignores it again

The book is called "The Holy Reich".


e299f9  No.11990620

>>11989481

>>11989976

>"jews in the jewish bible are actually white and BASED"

>"modern day jews and judaism aren't actually jewish, modern day jews are actually g-d damn babylonians and pagans!"

>"all people that use a cross worship a dead jewish rabbi as a god!"

>"people who don't worship a dead jewish rabbi as a god have nigger brains and can't possibly comprehend christianity, which is actually european and NOT jewish"

>>11988046

Some are obviously JIDF. Some. The rest are mentally deranged semitic worshipers. Each of them have their own headcanon that revolves around denying objective incriminating flaws with christianity. There's no consistency with any of them. They get proven wrong and called out, then they show up in a new thread to recycle the same old points.

Here's some off the top of my head:

> the jews in the bible were good jews!

> wait, they weren't even jews, they were white!

> the old testament proves the based jews were white!

> the old testament is jewish and you don't need it, also read the KJV version only

> the greek original bible doesn't matter either, but read the KJV and dead sea scrolls

> don't believe people who bring up the plagiarism in the old testament, they are pagan LARPers

> the plagiarism in the old testament proves the old testament is jewish, but the new testament is okay


a4fed4  No.11990685

>>11990620

I used to be one of them.

I even went to god damn seminary.

I got my bachelors in Theological Studies (Ministry).

Then I realised I was doing exactly what you greentexted.

I interviewed a fuckton of scholars and what not about my questions.

I realised that it was literally all Zogged to shit. Literally a controlled op in a way.

Now I don't know what the fuck I believe. I believe in a God but I really need some convincing.

Feel free to ask anything about what seminaries are actually like. I have a lot of cringe stories including being asked to apologise for being white to a black student to a literal nigger being held above all other students because he was trying his best…failing but trying


869b4a  No.11990711

File: c8119bae8e0ccf0⋯.png (504.84 KB, 787x857, 787:857, omg.png)

>>11990480

>You've yet to substantiate that he didn't.

All references that I'm finding to such a claim refer back to Richard Steigmann-Gall, the Kent State University Director of the Jewish Studies Program from 2004 to 2010.

>>11990480

>to remove any element that proves that NSDAP struggled against christian traitors.

I like how you're trying to reframe this. It's cute.

>>11990587

>inb4 he ignores it again

But Mr. Torpedo, I didn't ignore it the first time. >>11990112


000000  No.11990751

>>11990711

So if a jew says something positive or is involved in something in any way that makes it null and void? Didn't Hitler allow some half jews into the Reich?

Uh-oh!

Jews for Jesus?

Oh dear!


ba394e  No.11990779

>>11990685

Well since i suppose you no longer consider yourself a christian or at least don't believe it like you used to what form of spirituality are you planning on having a look at next if any?


869b4a  No.11990829

File: 9c1c0b6108274dc⋯.jpg (131.89 KB, 799x918, 47:54, 1287ec2ecd3b196715a06ca5cf….jpg)

>>11990751

So I should take the word of people regarding their stated enemy? Makes sense. It's not like they've already been caught lying about these people over 6,000,000 times before or anything.


000000  No.11990887

>>11990829

>Never trust a kike!

>Except when they're part of the Reich!

You're so full of shit it's coming out of your ears. You'll disregard historical research by a guy who is a jew, but you'll bend over backwards to attach your Semitic faith, which allowed jews to convert to it, to National Socialism which allowed jews to be part of it. Utterly inconsistent and cherry picking whatever will allow you to self-validate what you want to believe in the easiest way possible.

>Here's some jews who lied and are shitty people so I am justified in rejecting this information that refutes my beliefs because it was compiled by a jew!

>Well Hitler had good reasons for allowing jews to be officers in the Reich. No, no the Reich is good! I love Hitler and I love the Church!

>But there are no good jews.

>Jews are never part of good things!

>Jew converts that the Church accepted?

>…

You're all kinds of fucked up.


e299f9  No.11991237

>>11990685

>Now I don't know what the fuck I believe.

text from another post:

At this time, I suspect that many present-day problems that Europeans face stem from European spiritual disease/desolation, which is arguably the designed result of semitic ideologies (including Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Marxism, and Holocaustianity) that jews and their "shabbos goyim" attempted to spread throughout Europe via charlatanry, brainwashing, bribery, fear, and/or bloodshed.

Further, I suspect that Hitler attempted to create a better European spirituality, a spirituality that does not have the shortcomings of native European religions nor the shortcomings of foreign jew-concocted alternatives.

A term that Hitler frequently used in his book Mein Kampf is the word "Weltanshauung" which roughly means "world view".

From Mein Kampf:

Thus, when the Iron Chancellor surrendered the fate of his struggle against Marxism to the goodwill of the bourgeois Democracy, he was leaving the goat to take care of the garden. But this was only the logical result of failure to find a fundamentally new Weltanshauung which was diametrically opposed to Marxism and inspired by an ardent determination to sweep all before it. Thus the result of the Bismarckian campaign was a bitter disappointment.


e299f9  No.11991244

>>11990685

>Now I don't know what the fuck I believe.

text from another post:

Also from Mein Kampf:

In reality what distinguished Karl Marx from the millions who were affected in the same way was that, in a world already in a state of gradual decomposition, he used the unerring instinct of the prophetic genius to detect the essential poisons, so as to extract them and concentrate them, with the art of an alchemist, in a solution which would bring about the rapid destruction of the independent nations of the earth. All this was done in the service of his race.

Thus the Marxian doctrine is the concentrated extract of the mentality which underlies the general Weltanshauung to-day.

For this reason alone it is out of the question and even ridiculous to think that what is called our bourgeois world can put up any effective fight against Marxism, for this bourgeois world is permeated with all those same poisons, and its Weltanshauung in general differs from Marxism only in degree and in the character of the persons who hold it.

The bourgeois world is Marxist, but believes in the possibility of a certain group of people - that is to say, the bourgeoise - being able to dominate the world, while Marxism itself systematically aims at delivering the world into the hands of the Jews.

Over against all this, the völkisch Weltanshauung recognizes that the primordial racial elements are of the greatest significance for mankind.

In principle, the State is looked upon only as a means to an end and this end is the conservation of the racial characteristics of mankind.

The völkisch principle does not admit that one race is equal to another, but by recognising that they are different, separates mankind into races of superior and inferior quality.

On the basis of this recognition it feels bound, in conformity with the Eternal Will that dominates the universe, to postulate the victory of the better and stronger and the subordination of the inferior and weaker thus subscribing to Nature's fundamental aristocratic principle and it believes that this law holds good even down to the last individual organism.

It selects individual values from the mass and thus operates as an organising principle, whereas Marxism acts as a disintegrating solvent.

The völkisch belief holds that humanity must have its ideals, because ideals are a necessary condition of human existence itself.

But, on the other hand, it denies that an ethical ideal has the right to prevail if it endangers the existence of a race that is the champion of a higher ethical ideal, for in a world composed of mongrels and Negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealised future for humanity would be lost for ever.

On this planet of ours human culture and civilisation are indissolubly bound up with the presence of the Aryan. If he were to be exterminated or become extinct, then the dark shroud of a new barbaric era would enfold the earth.

To undermine the existence of human culture by exterminating its custodians would be an execrable crime in the eyes of those who subscribe to the völkisch Weltanshauung.

Whoever dares to raise his hand against the highest image of God, sins against the bountiful Creator of this marvel and contributes to the expulsion from Paradise.

Hence the völkisch Weltanshauung is in profound accord with Nature's most sacred will, because it restores the free play of the forces which, through reciprocal education, will produce a higher type, until finally the best portion of mankind will possess the earth and will be free to work in spheres which lie not only within, but without the limits of that earth.

We all feel that in the distant future man may be faced with problems which can be solved only by a superior race of human beings, which is master over all the other peoples and has at its disposal the means and resources of the whole world.


b24536  No.11991342

>>11990779

I've looked into several. Everything, I consulted with Paimon, I prayed at Temples to Nuwa. I went on a massive spiritual journey but I could never find anything that made me feel connected or 'real'.

Even now I'm just working my ass off constantly and don't drink/smoke/etc. I guess my religion right now is 'Pending' as I want to find the Truth, not just something comfortable because it makes me feel good.

>>11991237

>>11991244

Very nice Anon, Thank you.


d6b0bf  No.11991488

Guys, guys.

Heaven, okay l

Heaven.

A Christian is posting?

Just tl; dr: heaven.

Heaven.

All the fluff around it is Christian bureaucracy.

But the bottom line is heaven.

Heaven. Heaven. Heaven.

Gotta go to heaven.

Stop with all nonchristianity, because heaven.

Heaven, heaven, nothing else.

Heaven, heaven, nothing else.

Heaven, heaven, nothing else.

Mumbo jumbo blabla timewasting, just heaven.

Heaven, guys. Heaven.

Dog wants bone.

Christian wants heaven.

Dog shakes hand for bone.

Christian shakes frankincense for heaven.

Every breath a Christian takes is for heaven.

It's their only known solution to getting a soul (back).

We can blabla until the cows not only come home, but also die of old age.

Heaven, bro. Unless the blabla results in a way to heaven, it means exactly naught to OP and any other Christian.

By any means or long con or convoluted path you might indirectly take that, as OP hopes leaves you amiable toward Christianity and therefore toward heaven works for them.

Anything else goes in one ear and out the other.

Might as well talk to jews about not furthering jewish welfare.


783ef3  No.11991572

File: c0679c98088159c⋯.jpg (226.6 KB, 703x960, 703:960, pagangang vs semite snake.jpg)

>>11991488

heil hitler


6dd31f  No.11991811

>>11990711

>All references that I'm finding to such a claim refer back to Richard Steigmann-Gall, the Kent State University Director of the Jewish Studies Program from 2004 to 2010.

>that I'm finding

That's because you're intentionally trying not to find any other source showcasing how removing the old testament was a core element of Positive Christianity, arguably the part that christians saw as a line that had been crossed.

>I like how you're trying to reframe this. It's cute.

Thank you for an additional demonstration that your intentions are not genuine.


5717a7  No.11991986

https://chechar.wordpress.com/?s=All+Christians+are+Cucks&submit=Search

https://web.archive.org/web/20171229200732/http://www.renegadetribune.com/christians-cucks-7/


05fd83  No.11993103

File: 4b8938ca5a217fb⋯.gif (1.99 MB, 280x203, 40:29, e90e39355aee13b88eb09130b2….gif)

>>11990887

>Never trust a kike!

>Except when they're part of the Reich!

But Torpedo, you're making up that accusation.

>Here's some jews who lied and are shitty people so I am justified in rejecting this information that refutes my beliefs because it was compiled by a jew!

But Torpedo, you and the other guy are guilty of the same thing you're incorrectly accusing me of: relying on only one source for a claim. Richard Steigmann-Gall or John S. Conway, depending upon which claim we want to focus on.

>>11991237

>At this time, I suspect that many present-day problems that Europeans face stem from European spiritual disease/desolation, which is arguably the designed result of semitic ideologies (including Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Marxism, and Holocaustianity) that jews and their "shabbos goyim" attempted to spread throughout Europe via charlatanry, brainwashing, bribery, fear, and/or bloodshed.

I love how you guys (who I don't believe are actual pagans, though I may be wrong) talk about how weak, cucked, semitic, etc. Christianity is, and yet somehow such a weak religion promoted by such weak people managed to become predominant in Europe. If the crap you guys spew is to be believed, everyone was converted by the sword and none willingly. So if Christianity, so foolish and weak as it supposedly is, was able to do that, what does that say of your alleged pagan beliefs? Nevermind that you're trying to paint pagans as being functional Jews, claiming that Hitler and the Party were trying to deceive and subvert both the churches and the world. That's the Führer you wish to follow? The liar that you and the Jews make him out to be?

>>11991237

>I suspect that Hitler attempted to create a better European spirituality, a spirituality that does not have the shortcomings of native European religions

Wait a second… I thought the whole basis of your claim that Europe needs to return to paganism was that paganism was traditional? To invent something new is not traditional.

>>11991811

>That's because you're intentionally trying not to find any other source

<assertion>

Seeing as you clearly have more sources for this than what I was running into via a startpage search, please share them. A move of this magnitude, altering something fundamental to over 1,900 years of tradition, would surely have been catalogued by countless writers both within the Reich and abroad. Germany had a huge population. Perhaps there's some manner of conspiracy to hide all mention of this act? Spooky stuff.


fa534d  No.11993443

>>11990112

Saged

Is changing ID's some sort of issue? I move around a lot so my ID's are always changing. Honestly, I am uncertain why other peoples ID's seems so stagnant. Don't you people ever go anywhere or run an errand?


5338a2  No.11993521

>>11988250

>>11988250

That passage refers to religious people that reveal the trancendental knowledge in exchange for piggy backs across rivers and tendies etc…


05fd83  No.11993542

>>11993443

>Is changing ID's some sort of issue?

Generally every time you have to fill out another captcha you get another ID. IDs are not the same for every thread. Some people will intentionally change IDs within a thread to avoid filtering or to pretend to be multiple people in order to astroturf.


6dd31f  No.11993783

Let's see if captcha let me keep my ID. 1/2

>>11993103

> you and the other guy are guilty of the same thing you're incorrectly accusing me of: relying on only one source for a claim.

You've done a lot more than just rely on one source. You constantly minimize the importance of flaws in your narrative because you're trying to eliminate any guilt on the christians part with how the NSDAP struggled to assimilate them into NSDAP society. In doing so, you utilize many dishonest argumentative tricks to misdirect.

> Christianity is, and yet somehow such a weak religion promoted by such weak people managed to become predominant in Europe. If the crap you guys spew is to be believed, everyone was converted by the sword and none willingly.

False dilemma. Christianity is a tradition of traitors. Through the early cultists and later the catholic church relied on many tactics to spread christianity but mostly subversion. Different areas of Europe were converted every other century because you're dealing with different European cultures. When needed, they would rely on armies to forcibly convert new people who had to abide by the slave mentality that christianity instills, whether that be hired from the late "holy" roman empire or supporting a would-be monarch who would then gain the church's approval. They were mostly direct during the "holy" roman empire period but switched to indirect tactics by relying mainly on traitorous would-be monarchs.

Since you're still stumped on Positive Christianity it's obvious you will move onto a different aspect of Christianity's history and try to use FUD tactics there because you have no substance. By doing so you will reveal your long-term agenda. Go ahead and prove me right. It was already obvious before, by the way.

>Nevermind that you're trying to paint pagans as being functional Jews, claiming that Hitler and the Party were trying to deceive and subvert both the churches and the world.

Thank you again for demonstrating how your aim here is to be as dishonest as possible. Again, you're now moving away from Positive Christianity because you're stumped but I'll go ahead and call it now that your long-term goal is just to cast doubt on the truth of what the nature of christianity actually is. You saw the potential in Positive Christianity's truth and what it tells, so you started there, failed, and are trying to worm out of this.

The NSDAP did utilize deception, but you're stretching and generalizing the implications of that solely based on the use of deception. As many have stated before, including other threads that Positive Christianity is discussed in, the goals of the NSDAP through Positive Christianity was to give christians a chance to assimilate to NSDAP goals and by extension society. The voting records for what elected the NSDAP and ended the weimar republic indicated that christians would be NSDAP's greatest resistance.

>That's the Führer you wish to follow? The liar that you and the Jews make him out to be?

Again, I sincerely thank you for demonstrating how disingenuous you are. Dealing with christian subversion is an unprecedented task for any leader. Handling traitors that do not fully realize how they are traitors by allowing them to assimilate and choose which is more important, the reich or their religion, is the kindest way to handle them but still placing the reich's needs above all else. Hitler is famously kind and by extension so is the NSDAP for their collaborative effort to treat even the most traitorous elements of the reich with a way to redeem themselves. The implication that he is a liar came from you, and like other jews you will use his words and actions against him and do the same for anyone else in the NSDAP.


6dd31f  No.11993784

2/2

><assertion>

More like, hitting the nail on the head like with everything else pointed out that you're doing.

>Seeing as you clearly have more sources for this than what I was running into via a startpage search, please share them

You put more effort into this in the Christians in Haiti thread but you eventually ran into a wall there and started doubling down on your deliberate use of argumentative fallacies. Then because you were not anticipating being exposed as you were there, you began to do this a lot earlier and now this thread will just be about you and why no one will trust what you have to say on this topic.

>A move of this magnitude, altering something fundamental to over 1,900 years of tradition, would surely have been catalogued by countless writers both within the Reich and abroad.

You're trying to create a juxtaposition where you overstate the importance of christianity and thus reveal how you're trying to create a context where this is somehow unbelievable. In the process you're revealing how important christianity is for jewish use rather than for European. The context you're trying to create by pretending 1900 years was the life up until then for christianity in Europe as a whole ignores both the gradual century-by-century spread of christianity and the inevitable resistance to christianity.

>Germany had a huge population. Perhaps there's some manner of conspiracy to hide all mention of this act? Spooky stuff.

There isn't. The stories of actual instances of the NSDAP rooting out christian traitors was re-framed to be about the NSDAP persecuting christians is known as Kirchenkampf. Feel free to dismiss Kirchenkampf like you had before.

>>11993443

>Is changing ID's some sort of issue? I move around a lot so my ID's are always changing. Honestly, I am uncertain why other peoples ID's seems so stagnant. Don't you people ever go anywhere or run an errand?

If you're contributing to a thread a lot, it is suspicious to have a rapidly changing ID. If you were trying to convince people in a thread of something and suddenly your ID changed, it's all the more suspicious. The person you're replying to has a habit of changing his ID for whatever reason, and that's aside from his established history of being dishonest and having a revisionist history agenda.


bdb808  No.11993824

>>11987760

My ancestor Jefferson did something similar beforehand. As most of you know, the Founding Father of the US were very White and very pro-white, as this is natural. Great Thomas wrote many things–one of them was the Jefferson Bible. He was a proto-odinist, basically, so why do that?

He was following the Aryan instinct to seek objective truth. He had reasoned that he would take out the most contradictory (read: semitic) BS. Logically, the limit of that function, if repeated over and over, would at the end result in simply editing all of it out, because it is ultimately ALL semitic bullshit. That is the logical end, and any old hands who don't PR cuck inevitably drop all of it.

Some cling to their brainwashing harder than others. Religion is not any different as a topic.

>>11987764

At the time and place, in that particular situation, the advocacy of Positive Christianity (lol) was wise. One can see simply by looking around at pro-whites one hundred years later how difficult it is to get anyone fully redpilled, simply because they tend to hang onto their own weaknesses because they think it's "them." This problem is no different between a cuckservative and a bluehair. You're either pro-white or you're anti-white.

What is ultimately ridiculous about simpletons continuing to quote kikes (literally everywhere, not any one poster in particular) is that they will never think for themselves–they will never go back to ancestral thinking, and they will remain forever mired in the shekelgrabbers' terminology, accursed as it is.

>>11987772

No one cares. People who can't handle discussion can generally go fuck themselves.

>>11987796

The end result is our death, just as intended. [rubs hands]

>>11987911

Stop listening to kikes. Just look at that garbage. You think nations are based on a book? Holy shit, nigger, get help ASAP.

odinia.org


bdb808  No.11993910

>>11988237

>muh saying

>muh kikes said this or that

I N O P E R A B L E


000000  No.11994137

>>11993103

I'm making up that there were half jews in the Reich? Are you retarded? Serious question, do you have some kind of learning disorder? Do you understand the difference between a single source and a compilation of multiple sources that are used to describe something? For example: A person can give a first hand account of an event and that would be a single source, or one can compile multiple first hand accounts of an even which would also be a single source; however the two single sources are not equivalent. Do you understand? A personal account of something vs multiple accounts of something compiled into a single collection. Yes? No?


578ddc  No.11994489

File: fab5542e71ab016⋯.jpg (395.48 KB, 1919x1079, 1919:1079, 01 - 79k7yq3.jpg)

>>11987911 (check)

HAIL JESUS CHRIST

Hail his prophet, Adolf Hitler

SIEG HEIL


000000  No.11994576

>>11994489

>(1)

>trying to force the numbers for you agenda

You deserved to fail.


2ce626  No.11994894

>>11993783

>You constantly minimize the importance of flaws in your narrative

no u

>the slave mentality that christianity instills

Alright, let's hear what you've got to offer then. Proselytize me Cap'n.

>you're now moving away from Positive Christianity because you're stumped

I love how you keep reiterating the same assertions as though doing so will make them true. I've rejected your sources as Jewish and requested you provide me more, which you've yet to do because you don't have any other sources. Prove me wrong. I'd at least like to get to the bottom of when and where these idiotic claims originated, assuming that John S. Conway and his buddy Richard Steigmann-Gall aren't the inventors.

>The NSDAP did utilize deception, but you're stretching and generalizing the implications of that solely based on the use of deception.

>The implication that he is a liar came from you

If what you're saying about Hitler and the whole of the party were true, then that would mean that they were attempting to subvert the faith of an entire nation through bold faced lies, and to replace that faith with an even bigger lie. I'm not stretching anything. I'm merely pointing out the necessary implications of what you're saying.

>>11993784

>doubling down on your deliberate use of argumentative fallacies

I'm asking for more sources. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. That's not a logical fallacy. Why do you keep deflecting?

>>11993542

>>11993784

>You're trying to create a juxtaposition where you overstate the importance of christianity and thus reveal how you're trying to create a context where this is somehow unbelievable

If Donald Trump so much as mused in passing about the possibility that he didn't consider the old testament as significant as the new testament, there would be a torrent of articles written about how erroneous and egregious this is. Major church figures would be clamoring to council him on the importance of the old testament and they would be asking their congregational constituents to pray for God to grant him wisdom. Hostile newspapers, at home and abroad, would be writing articles accusing him of everything from apostasy to heresy. Do you really intend to tell me that Hitler would not have received the same treatment?

>The person you're replying to has a habit of changing his ID for whatever reason

I have 3 IDs in this thread so far. The one from when I posted this thread, the one I used for most of this thread yesterday, and the one I'm using now because it's a day later. 098893, 869b4a, and 6dd31f. I've made no attempt to hide or misrepresent this. >>11987767

I'll leave it to the search spiders indexing this thread to ascertain your motives.

>a revisionist history agenda

Revisionists are the ones that say the Holohoax didn't happen. If you don't believe it happened, then why are the only sources that are brought forth in this thread so far people that would tell us that it did happen? (John S. Conway and Richard Steigmann-Gall) And if they would lie about the Holohoax, what else would they lie about?


2ce626  No.11994898

>>11994894

>I have 3 IDs in this thread so far.

Just had to fill out another captcha, make that 4 IDs.


2ce626  No.11994927

>>11994137

>I'm making up that there were half jews in the Reich?

But Torpedo, I never claimed that.

>>11993824

>Great Thomas wrote many things–one of them was the Jefferson Bible. He was a proto-odinist

I'm pretty sure the "Jefferson Bible" was basically his abridged study bible, which he originally started as a project to aid in the work of converting some Indian tribe, but for whatever reason never ended up using it to that end. Also he was an ardent Unitarian.

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/98-01-02-2905

>>11993824

>You think nations are based on a book?

God is not a book.


000000  No.11994988

>>11994927

>ignores the rest of the post

>he's just deflecting at this point

That's why you're referred to as Christkikes.


a1ac2c  No.11997158

File: acf02b305386ce2⋯.gif (1.9 MB, 312x250, 156:125, m'lady.gif)

>>11994988

>That's why you're referred to as Christkikes.


54dbe3  No.11997191

I think people need to be reminded that

LARPPAGANS ARE TOTALLY IRRELEVANT

LARPPAGANS ARE TOTALLY IRRELEVANT

LARPPAGANS ARE TOTALLY IRRELEVANT

You fucking autists only exist here and on black metal youtube videos.


000000  No.11997217


5c2ecc  No.11997227

>>11997191

>larpagans are irrelevant

<still around despite a "full christian conquest"

>Christians shit their pants when even a fraction of their faith is disturbed because they know it's all a hoax that will fly away like a bird if it's not shilled every day.

Remember, if we erase all current religion and spirituality but keep the ability to be religious and spiritual, nobody will recite the "true word of god" verbatim, but people will dream up thundergods and death spirits at the drop of a hat.

People give a personality and life to inanimate objects "stupid phone" way way before recreating the alleged true Jehova heeb religion from scratch again 1:1 verbatim (which has to happen since its the truuuuth)


5bffe5  No.11997310

File: f9cc996b2a0f3cf⋯.jpg (36.83 KB, 680x483, 680:483, 1503173738064.jpg)

>>11997244

Well meme'd gentlefag.


5c2ecc  No.11997328

File: 58dc865271cee97⋯.jpg (82.68 KB, 678x678, 1:1, a_liar.jpg)

>>11997310

Thanks bro.

Did you know that a Christian life is the best life?

>yeah dude, totally

So, a Christian life is best life, but what if there was no heaven at the end and all you got was a Christian life you would also have as if there was a heaven at the end, only there is not.

<are you kidding me you asshole the whole point of Christianity is heaven, you think the life means anything? I already routinely fail nofap and I beg on my knees for forgiveness as do many others at >>>/christian/.

<you think the life is what matters? that's just marketing wank.

<you're always 100% right anon, we really only care about heaven.

Thanks for agreeing with me.


54dbe3  No.11998005

>>11997227

>still around

Where? /pol/ and the comment section of Thulean Perspective?


66fb46  No.11998305

>>11988160

>the JIDF spends huge amounts of time editing wikipedia in order to support the Church of Rome and help it dissociate itself from the NSDAP

lolwut?


5c2ecc  No.11999507

File: 34037bf986a8bcf⋯.webm (3.14 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, baganism_is_ded_guyse.webm)

>>11998005

>Where? /pol/ and the comment section of Thulean Perspective?

In countries that haven't cut off 30% of their culture and penis.


f05980  No.12002213

File: 3216813dd54dae4⋯.jpg (47.56 KB, 762x269, 762:269, 1942 AD New York Times on ….jpg)

File: cdb7f2c9647eebe⋯.jpg (137.32 KB, 362x757, 362:757, 1942 AD New York Times on ….jpg)

>>11987669

>>11988323

I've read through them now and I am very pleased with the contents. I'm in the process of recording them and will post them when I'm done. They've helped me to identify what I suspect may be another archaic example of fake news. Your author, Mr. Winrod, gives estimates of the demographics of the churches and also suggests that the "German Christians" denomination's beliefs took more after Ludendorf's brand of paganism (worship of Wotan/Odin) than what is suggested by those who bring up Alfred Rosenberg. This creates a dilemma with regards to the validity of the "30 point program" for the German church that Rosenberg is alleged to have authored, which would stand in stark contrast to any theological hybrid birthed by Ludendorf paganism.

Attempting to identify the origins of this document, or any copy of it which may exist, leads me back to a New York Times article from 1942 by Daniel T. Bringham. It was conveniently conveyed via phone interview. The bottom line of the article reads as follows:

>This program, already widely circulated among the party hierarchs, has been submitted to Reichsfuehrer Hitler for his action. The people themselves have not been informed nor will they be until the church is accepted

Now I'm forced to ask, how on earth would a Jew York Times reporter have gotten his grubby little hands on an internal Party document that was only available amongst Party leadership if such a document even existed? Particularly given the lügenpresse thing? It really gets the noggin joggin. Unless someone can give me an earlier source for this document than the aforementioned article, I'm forced to the conclude that it's more Bolshevik propaganda to turn the American people against their German brothers.


000000  No.12002260

>christians

>spew a lot of shit

>never can anwer a simple existential question

Can any Christian truly fathom living for an eternity? Not 1 year, not 100 years, not 1000 years, not 1 million years, not 1 billion years, not 1 trillion years–eternity.

You tell me how any of you could truly bear to exist that long.


63b93c  No.12002274

>>11999507

not

>jewish prison island

Changing up the vernacular I see.

I always see you in these religion threads, and nowhere else. Funny…..


f05980  No.12002466

>>12002260

>You tell me how any of you could truly bear to exist that long.

Sure. In orthodox Christian theology there's something called glorification. At the end of this universe both the damned and the redeemed will be resurrected as immortals and be sorted from one another, to be sent to their respective new abodes. The damnation thing I'm sure you're familiar with, but those who are redeemed are now glorified. Their new body and mind are no longer subject to the frailties and weaknesses of this life, whether physical or mental. Even their wants and needs will be corrected. Living in your current state as a fallen creature, yes living forever would be suffering. But living forever as the object of your Creator's mercy and kindness? I'd say that doesn't sound too bad at all.


000000  No.12002483

>>12002466

I get that the whole counter argument is centered around being made perfect (both in the heaven and hell case since you must be perfect to remain immortal. All that differs is your surroundings). However, I claim that even upon being made "perfect," after a sufficient amount of time it would be too much to bear. Imagine: you want to do x, y, z and related after death. Ok, you do that. That would at most take a finite amount of time. Same for anything else. After a finite amount of time (long time) you will have accomplished anything and everything you could ever desire. At that point, there is nothing left to do–what then?

That's why I would desire eternal rest, otherwise, what am I to do after I have accomplished all that I desired?

If I am to just assume that one can bear with having nothing to do for endless amounts of time due to being made perfect, I just couldn't believe it.


dbd1d7  No.12002583

File: 61270d1524eb7d4⋯.jpg (76.45 KB, 1342x318, 671:159, anti semitism circa early ….jpg)

>>11987669

>>after the 1800s is not representative of a healthy Christian faith

Try the 1400s, Christians let the jews into Europe and try as they can, are never able to kill any moderate amount of jews or make the jews leave permanently. Any Christian attack against the jews has usually been decried in its own time and the instigators of such an attack excommunicated and/or executed, worse than that however is the sons and daughters of these based White Christians are made to feel guilty that their forefathers hurt the poor innocent jews who just want peace and the whole world under the Abrahamic faith and so the jews are allowed back in and even given reparations.


f05980  No.12002584

>>12002483

>(both in the heaven and hell case since you must be perfect to remain immortal. All that differs is your surroundings)

You're reading into the meaning of perfect. God can maintain your body by his power without fixing the jacked up state of your mind and spirit. That is the difference.

>Imagine: you want to do x, y, z and related after death. Ok, you do that. That would at most take a finite amount of time. Same for anything else. After a finite amount of time (long time) you will have accomplished anything and everything you could ever desire. At that point, there is nothing left to do–what then?

You are speaking from the viewpoint of an already fallen creature. You can no more understand the perspective of a glorified state of being than your common Marxist can understand the perspective of a National Socialist. It is altogether alien. In fact, I understand where you're coming from.


f05980  No.12002705

>>12002583

>Try the 1400s

>screencap talking about the papacy

You remember several centuries ago when Protestants and Roman Catholics were killing each other in droves in Europe? Protestants don't recognize the papacy's authority or authenticity. So no, a pope is not a good representation of Christianity in my opinion.

>Christians let the jews into Europe

Betrayers and the naive let them into Europe. I've done enough reading on various Jewish expulsions to have a pretty decent idea of how these rats keep crawling back in.

>Any Christian attack against the jews has usually been decried in its own time

As would be any attack on Jews by Muslims, Buddhists, and even proper pagan groups. Jews infiltrate and subvert, that's what they do, and they'll try to find a way to flip it no matter who it is that's "persecuting" them. They are eternal victims. It's a core concept of their cultural identity.


786ad9  No.12005835

File: 42e3d62e12fe8fd⋯.jpg (178.88 KB, 1280x967, 1280:967, 42e3d62e12fe8fd32c3eeff7dc….jpg)

>>11988323

>>11987709

>I have scans of a short booklet called "The German Church Situation" by Gerald B. Winrod that I can post.

Alright, I've cooked up the audio! This will make an excellent companion for the first book. >>11987669

It fills in certain blanks and gives an American point of view.

https://my.mixtape.moe/zpemyd.zip

The full length is 21:13

By the way, for the benefit of anons who are learning, I would like to point out that at 11:03 or near the top of page 9 of the pamphlet, a very significant piece of information is given.

>The present conflict is inter-church in character. Nazi officials maintain the position of umpire except when some outspoken pastor openly criticizes the government.

This is distinct commentary on the "Church Struggle", known as the Kirchenkampf. Kirchenkampf is the go-to for anti-Christian shills that want to pretend the German government was persecuting Christians. Take note.

If anyone else has any good English language reporting or books that can offer more light on the situation of the churches in Germany during the Third Reich, please share them! I will gladly record more.


63b93c  No.12005883

>>12005835

>No state persecution of Christians=/= German govt was pro Christianity.

>Also- some Christian imagery=/= theocracy

The third reich's opinion on Christianity was pretty much "worship how you want, but if you try to be a subversive in the name of religion, you will be shut up" Which is the way society should be tbh.


786ad9  No.12005924

>>12005883

>German govt was pro Christianity

I challenge you to demonstrate that it wasn't. Everything that I just recorded says that it explicitly was. The burden of proof to the contrary is upon you.


63b93c  No.12006014

>>12005924

I'm not even going to bother, polvol2. In the face of evidence here and in the meta, your pro Christian bias shines through. But, I guess you can keep believing that a lapsed catholic (hitler) a neo-pagan (Himmler) and other top anti Christian NSDAP brass ran a theocracy, if it helps you sleep at night.

Joseph Goebbels - "There is there an insoluble opposition between the Christian and a heroic-German world view.

Goebbels again- "What does Christianity mean today? National Socialism is a religion, all we lack is a religious genius who is capable of uprooting outmoded religious practices, and putting new ones in their place."

Martin Bormann- "National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable"

So like I said, "worship however you want, but if you use religion as an excuse to be a subversive, you get a nice trip to the work camp."


786ad9  No.12006558

File: 6e5d95c51263ee3⋯.mp4 (144.87 KB, 720x504, 10:7, 6e5d95c51263ee3f0bd38b597e….mp4)

>>12006014

>polvol2

?

>in the meta

?

>your pro Christian bias shines through

I never tried to pretend like I didn't have a Christian bias. Will you acknowledge yours?

>NSDAP brass ran a theocracy

I never suggested that. However it is worth noting that the German Evangelical Church (Lutherans) had their salaries and property maintenance costs paid for with tax dollars, as is mentioned in my second recording. >>12005835 Also religious teaching was mandatory in German schools under the NSDAP.

>Joseph Goebbels - "There is there an insoluble opposition between the Christian and a heroic-German world view.

‘The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution of the Christian Churches.’ Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, 2001.

The original source for this quote is the documents provided by the Office of Strategic Services, the precursor to the modern CIA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Strategic_Services

>Goebbels again- "What does Christianity mean today? National Socialism is a religion, all we lack is a religious genius who is capable of uprooting outmoded religious practices, and putting new ones in their place."

The original source of this quote is the Joseph Goebbels diary entry for October 16, 1928.

This diary is of questionable origin and I do strongly suspect it to be tampered with, given that it seems to support the absurd Holohoax narrative. There's a very strong possibility that it's more Soviet/Jewish propaganda.

https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=3793

>Martin Bormann- "National Socialism and Christianity are irreconcilable"

The original source for this quote is William L. Shirer; The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich; Secker & Warburg; London; 1960; p. 240.

William L. Shirer was named as a communist influencer by the anti-communist tract Red Channels. He's number 115 on the list.

https://www.imdb.com/list/ls076989046/?sort=list_order,asc&mode=detail&page=2

But you don't need to take their word for it. His anti-German literature and Jewish wife speak for themselves.

Got any other quotes from anti-German sources that I can debunk? If I didn't know any better, I'd think you were simply uncritically grabbing quotes off of wikipedia and presenting them as credible.


63b93c  No.12010432

>>12006558

>literally pulling a "who me???"

ghey


27adae  No.12010516

File: 220f25e1fb8a842⋯.jpg (58.93 KB, 800x536, 100:67, go back.jpg)


63b93c  No.12014530

>>12010516

>(1) defending a mod

Kill yourself, polvol2 dicksucker.


b76d31  No.12020401

bump


607868  No.12024301

File: 3424a5c6f19a520⋯.jpg (991.12 KB, 952x1408, 119:176, General Offensive.jpg)

>>11987669

>Public domain, CC0 fallback. Share this truth with whomever you can and however you can. I've also included a PDF copy of the book in case you need the text. Please upload my audio to other sites as well.

That goes for both recordings, right?

I'll see what I can do to spread these around. Aside from the debate about what certain figures in the NSDAP did or didn't think about Christianity, the bigger issue is (obviously) that most of the people who supported National Socialism were Christians, and that Christians weren't turned into furniture or cleaning products, or persecuted in any way. Those facts can hopefully bring a few "judeo" Christians out of their trance.

>>12005835

>If anyone else has any good English language reporting or books that can offer more light on the situation of the churches in Germany during the Third Reich, please share them! I will gladly record more.

I have a lot of scans of English pro-NS/anti-jew material from that era that I snagged from a jewish org's archives. I think that's the only complete booklet about the Church situation, but I'll skim through the newspapers (most of which were overtly Christian w/ titles like "The Christian Defender") and see if I can find anything else related. Before I start digging, are there any other subjects you're interested in that I should keep an eye for it?


607868  No.12024529

File: aae980eb2b78eaf⋯.jpg (850.92 KB, 1600x2079, 1600:2079, 01.jpg)

File: e9f3d0ea37149c6⋯.jpg (2.43 MB, 3246x2145, 1082:715, 02.jpg)

File: a9122c9dffa1129⋯.jpg (2.19 MB, 3237x2173, 3237:2173, 03.jpg)

File: b1b488d8d83ac0e⋯.jpg (1.81 MB, 3229x2126, 3229:2126, 04.jpg)

File: d326cd112e2eee9⋯.jpg (997.48 KB, 1653x2131, 1653:2131, 05.jpg)

>>12024301

A few I found. Doubt there's anything you would want to record, but still interesting none the less.


607868  No.12024532

File: 13bfdc15c336d8b⋯.jpg (1.19 MB, 1632x2096, 102:131, 01.jpg)

File: 786a1844a21023f⋯.jpg (248.77 KB, 786x840, 131:140, 02.jpg)


607868  No.12024545

File: fdd4abd1684feb0⋯.jpg (742.92 KB, 1536x2256, 32:47, Pall 1.jpg)

File: 69bc87f0911d0c2⋯.jpg (2.38 MB, 3040x2320, 38:29, Pall 2.jpg)

File: bc8cf7d7054bfa6⋯.jpg (2.98 MB, 3036x2238, 506:373, Pall 3.jpg)

File: c167fbadbc8cae7⋯.jpg (3.06 MB, 3056x2272, 191:142, Pall 4.jpg)

File: ca93ec1a2d891e3⋯.png (3.41 MB, 1568x2272, 49:71, Pall 5.png)

>>12024532

It's just one of many issues covered in this one.


b1d2ce  No.12028676

>>12024301

>That goes for both recordings, right?

I can't speak to the copyright status of the pamphlet. It shouldn't still be copywritten, if it ever was in the first place, but it's hard to tell with stuff like that. But assuming that it's in the public domain, yes, the same goes for my recording as well and any further recordings I post in this thread.

>are there any other subjects you're interested in that I should keep an eye for it?

Reformers who speak to the Jewish question. I'm in the process of recording The Jews and Their Lies, but I'm sure there's other stuff out there.

>>12024545

This looks interesting. I'll look over this one. Thank you for looking into this stuff!


058b18  No.12028698

Christians have to find something Christian in something to care about it.


b1d2ce  No.12028741

>>12028676

>20:15:31

>>12028698

>20:20:31

5 minutes to the second. That's impressive timing.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / abc / agatha2 / arepa / christ / fast / hispint / tacos / tenda ]