[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / britfeel / caffe / femdom / firechan / flutter / had / marx / rolo ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
Winner of the 58rd Attention-Hungry Games
/8diamonds/ - Death can be a merciful thing

October 2018 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

File: 6e1b4b9021b421d⋯.jpg (213.17 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, maxresdefault (17).jpg)

73a73e  No.12060517

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccxVYborUcU

> Make mass transit free

> Poorfags happy for a year or two

> Mass transit infrastructure and vehicles are inadequately maintained and deteriorate

> Public mass transit replaced by Uber buses

> Uber buses get banned

> The city is abandoned by poorfags

> Detroit 2.0

> It wasn't real socialism

20b34d  No.12060526

>fasco-communist


6e6f42  No.12060530

>>12060517

It could work if the population in the city were human. Not with niggers around, though. Nothing can ever work if you have niggers.


49e422  No.12060532

>>12060517

Sage for total lack of comprehension of politics.


78f80e  No.12060544

>pay taxes

>city hires company to provide mass transit

>company charges passengers, city, and feds if possible

>passenger gets triple charged

Mass transit should be "free", especially in dense cities.


73a73e  No.12060565

>>12060544

The free market is always more efficient than government central planning. Mass transit should be 100% private and without any ties or entanglements with the state.


881ac7  No.12060568

Amtrack comes to mind


a42b1f  No.12060574

"""free"""

no one's gonna pay for it, everyone is gonna construct it, work for it, and operate it without payment. sure.


51e723  No.12060578

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>12060565

>pay taxes

>government builds roads and stuff

What's wrong with that? Or do think the free market will stop one group from monopolizing the transit system in a city? What would competition look like, in the mass transit market?


73a73e  No.12060601

>>12060578

Monopolies in the free market cannot send enforcers to extort the population like the state does. If a corporation becomes a monopoly, it does so because it is exceptionally good at satisfying the needs and wants of the people. It can remain a monopoly until it is disrupted by more efficient or innovative competitors. It is only meaningful to speak of monopolies in a leftist society, where monopolies can use the power of the state to suppress competition.


282c9f  No.12060609

>>12060517

you forget the biggest issue

>niggers use free transit to mess up white neighborhoods

It's why public transport is so shitty in St Louis; we don't want 'criminals' dindus to easily get to good neighborhoods.


51e723  No.12060626

>>12060601

But if they own the mass transit system, how can they be disrupted by a better competitor? What do competing mass transit companies look like? Do they have some kind of infrastructure sharing arrangement? How does it work?

Draw me a diagram or something, I'm obviously too retarded to understand. Explain it like you would to a child.


dbd7c8  No.12060633

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

This is what the liberals want.

This is what this central planner would have tax payers pay for so that niggers and other undesirables would ride for free.

according to lefties we need to give everyone taxpayer money due to automation, yet the same people also say that we should allow unskilled labor migration to continue along with paying unskilled people to breed.


75b3f5  No.12060666

File: 390d9a268bee23c⋯.png (945.14 KB, 1376x972, 344:243, 390d9a268bee23cdd5ceb2ce76….png)

>>12060601

>If a corporation becomes a monopoly, it does so because it is exceptionally good at satisfying the needs and wants of the people

Are people actually retarded enough to believe this? You can look no further than the game industry to see why monopolies and big corporations ruin everything.

>EA sues a company named origin until the legal burden puts them out of business so it wont interfere with their origin platform

>Creative did the same thing with a competitor for EAX who outperformed EAX, then when the company went out of business Creative bought up all their technology and shelved it

>EA buys out any company that gains traction then shuts them down

>PC games are completely tied down to console limitations, because console manufacturers pressure publishers to do so

>AA doesn't exist, because they will be completely overshadowed by AAA companies who spend more money on marketing than they do on the actual games

You guys are delusional as fucking communists.


712eca  No.12060684

>>12060565

>The free market is always more efficient than government central planning. Mass transit should be 100% private and without any ties or entanglements with the state.

–But the other guy is right, you know.

Consider the following:

1) mass transit is supposed to help poor people, ease road congestion and lower air pollution.

2) The cost of buying the machinery is paid for with tax money.

3) A lot of people think that the fares offset the cost, and they do. But usually not by much. And they run the buses/trains in circles anyway, even if nobody is on them. So it makes little sense to argue that the fares are really critical.

4) If govt wanted to encourage people to use mass transit, charging fares is the worst thing to do. And the fares hurt poor people the most, who are least likely to afford them.

If the govt wanted to track ridership, they could just scan your ID card or something. That would be a better way to track riders than asking for a wrinkled couple dollars.

And by the by–mass transit, like many government services, is not really supposed to turn a profit. It is supposed to lose money, or, at the very worst, break even.

The reason is that any "profit" collected by a government-run entity is basically pulling money out of the economy, and that isn't the point. The whole point of building it in the first place was to provide a less-expensive way for people to get around locally, and leave more money circulating in the economy for other things.


73a73e  No.12060687

>>12060626

It is quite simple, so no need for a diagram. In case of buses, the competitor would just buy and use their own buses. New York City had a quickly expanding network of competing subway systems until they were taken over by the city, and that is when the expansion stalled (imagine my shock!).

Nothing prevents competing mass transit companies from sharing infrastructure such as railroad lines. This works well in case of cable companies, for example, where the last mile of cable to your house is not redundant. However, it is not necessary to share mass transit–specific infrastructure for vigorous competition to exist or be possible because it is always possible to build new infrastructure.


10a975  No.12060691

>>12060626

Im not the guy you are replying to but say somebody builds a road from point A to point B, they charge a dollar for driving on it.

Then someone else builds a different road which they charge 50 cents.

Then people can choose which road to drive on.

Its not perfect but its better than the current system where big corporations take members of the government to dinner, buy them certain gifts, give them promises of jobs on the board of executives after they retire. And in return the government gives them a road contract. Which they end up winning over better companies who didnt have the right government connections.

And everyone has to pay for all that through taxes. But most of the taxes dont actually get spent on the roads they get wasted on expensive first class flights to Malibu to discuss climate change, or marble floors for government offices.

And the roads themselves collapse through lack of funding like that bridge in Italy.


37e13b  No.12060695

>>12060666

Quite spot on, Satan. Whenever anyone starts hearing libertarian arguments of a free market, point them towards the game industry as an example of any kind of competition and creativity being stifled by pseudo-monopolies. If they say they like those kind of games and console, they're probably just a normalfag with shit taste.


73a73e  No.12060707

>>12060666

>EA sues a company named origin until the legal burden puts them out of business so it wont interfere with their origin platform

IP rights don't exist in the free market, so EA would't be able to file these frivolous lawsuits.


51e723  No.12060717

>>12060687

>bus

But then they're dependent on the state funded transit system in order to function. That's not a free market solution.

>sharing infrastructure

But who owns it? What if they both want to use it at the same time? How are disputes settled? Who pays for the ongoing costs of said infrastructure?

>>12060691

We're talking about mass transit in an existing city. You're talking about laying down new roads in a fictional environment. That fine if you're designing a new city, but it's not a practical solution for moving people about, right now.


75b3f5  No.12060752

File: bc8de550fa0d19d⋯.jpg (58.46 KB, 800x450, 16:9, Hunt_Down_The_Freeman_cove….jpg)

>>12060707

>IP rights don't exist in the free market, so EA would't be able to file these frivolous lawsuits.

Can't wait for a world full of these.


10a975  No.12060771

>>12060717

>We're talking about mass transit in an existing city. You're talking about laying down new roads in a fictional environment. That fine if you're designing a new city, but it's not a practical solution for moving people about, right now.

When things get that overcrowded I would suggest making a new city.

I will never understand people who spend 3 or 4 hours per day commuting.


73a73e  No.12060777

>>12060684

>mass transit is supposed to help poor people, ease road congestion and lower air pollution.

No, that is fasco-communist gobbledygook. Mass transit is supposed to offer mass transit services to the people.

>The cost of buying the machinery is paid for with tax money.

Tax money is how the military ends up buying $100 hammers that are sold at Home Depot for $10. The point is not that something is paid for but how efficient is the transaction, whether it is proportionally responsive to demand, and what motivates the choices.

>A lot of people think that the fares offset the cost, and they do. But usually not by much.

Just because there is already a lot of extortion and inefficiency doesn't justify more of the same.

>If govt wanted to encourage people to use mass transit, charging fares is the worst thing to do.

The use of force to interfere in the economy and private choices is not encouragement but organized crime. People act according to their interests, and if they don't, then they cannot possibly elect a government to act in their interest.

>And by the by–mass transit, like many government services, is not really supposed to turn a profit.

The government cannot provide any services because it does not have anything to offer that was legitimately obtained.

>It is supposed to lose money, or, at the very worst, break even.

If an activity is losing money, then it does not contribute any value to the society. I realize that this can be hard for a leftist to understand, but consider a daily commute to the moon, which would lose a lot of money if artificially sustained by the state. That would be an enormous waste, but if not for the subsidy, nobody would think of moving to the moon and commuting daily to Earth in the first place.

>The reason is that any "profit" collected by a government-run entity is basically pulling money out of the economy

You are completely wrong. Taxes are pulling out money out of the economy, but profits are economic signals that (1) value is created and (2) there is a shortage of the respective goods or services, so more resources should be invested in this activity.


e67e63  No.12060789

File: 13c91db8f3b8b97⋯.jpg (171.51 KB, 600x428, 150:107, Demon Cruise.jpg)

>>12060666

Spot on Satan, spot on


51e723  No.12060791

>>12060766

What is the importance of 'profit' and 'value' to society? Seems pretty abstract.

>>12060771

>When things get that overcrowded I would suggest making a new city.

No problem. Keep it on your side of the country please.


10a975  No.12060794

>>12060791

>No problem. Keep it on your side of the country please.

I dont even think we are from the same country to begin with.


51e723  No.12060807

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>12060794

Try not to cluster too many of these cities on one side of your continent, it might flip over. Also, be wary of Mongols moving in.


2c5aca  No.12060830

File: d61a29274bcdae1⋯.webm (324.13 KB, 640x360, 16:9, You fucked up my face.webm)


73a73e  No.12060833

>>12060717

>But then they're dependent on the state funded transit system in order to function. That's not a free market solution.

There are plenty of bus companies that don't receive any state funding. For example, there are so-called Chinese buses that are cheaper than Greyhound, provide a better customer experience, and are faster than Greyhound buses. In other countries, there are plenty of bus companies that provide intra-city services, so it is known that city buses can be profitable in principle. Why completely private city buses are not widespread in the U.S. is a question of taxation and regulation.

>But who owns it? What if they both want to use it at the same time? How are disputes settled? Who pays for the ongoing costs of said infrastructure?

(1) Most infrastructure (roads and highways) would be owned by a third party. (2) If mass transit company A wants to use some infrastructure of mass transit company B, it can make an agreement to do so, similarly to how cell phone companies realize it makes economic sense to provide roaming services to each other. Sharing infrastructure between each other is not necessary for competing mass transit companies, so it is not really a concern. (3) Disputes are settled the same way any other dispute in the free market is settled: through negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or court proceedings. (4) Unlike government corporations, private companies have material incentives to keep their capital properly maintained and updated. The private mass transit companies will maintain their infrastructure from their revenues.

>We're talking about mass transit in an existing city.

In existing cities, the government mass transit systems just can't keep up. They are failing. This is what happens in every industry that is taken over by the state.


10a975  No.12060838

>>12060807

I would genuinely enjoy commuting if I lived there.


bcf17c  No.12060852

File: fabc9b0a0221e1c⋯.jpg (56.67 KB, 620x388, 155:97, China1_1432360i.jpg)

>>12060838

I wouldn't trust Chink buildings


e06b91  No.12060860

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

THREADLY REMINDER NOT TO SHILL FOR THE PETROL JEW.


518b28  No.12060869

>>12060766

>Tax money is how the military ends up buying $100 hammers that are sold at Home Depot for $10.

What happens is this:

>Ari is a government bureaucrat

>His friend Chiam runs a hammer factory

>Ari and Chiam collaborate on the tender specification that is presented to Gen. Shitlord in between martinis

>Oops! Thos Home Depot hammers use a type of steel not to spec. Luckily, Chiam's Hammers are the only one on the market that fits Ari's spec

Same thing is done for hiring. If you see a publicly announced job ad, it's there for show only.


fff9c1  No.12060882

I rode the bus for awhile.

It's as expensive as gas and car insurance.

It passed through the negro part of town, and I was the only white on the bus. Yeah, I know, you all would have killed them all with your left hand behind your back, but I was more of a sit down and put up with some bullshit rap music.

Didn't get robbed, but it happens all the time on the bus.

You'd have to pay me to do it again.

I can't wait for self driving cars that are so good that I can read a book on my commute.


15c55d  No.12060884

>>12060517

>free

For who? Ahhh, yes…


fff9c1  No.12060885

>>12060860

>Petrol Jews.

Yes, and here you are using JewTube telling us not to fall for the Petro Jew meme.


73a73e  No.12060887

>>12060791

>What is the importance of 'profit' and 'value' to society? Seems pretty abstract.

Actually, both are of direct relevance to every individual and, as a consequence, to the society.

Everything has some subjective value to every individual. These subjective values are different: for example, if a person prefers to eat apples over oranges, that means their subjective valuation of apples is higher in this context.

For every good or service there is a giant stack of subjective values that this good or service has in the eyes of an individual. One person might trade two oranges for one apple, while another would trade just one orange for an apple. Market prices are also subjective and reflect the statistics of subjective values.

Contribution of value to the society occurs when the society intersubjectively values the output of an economic activity more than its inputs.

Profits reflect the contribution of value, while losses represent the destruction of value. In the free market, profits indicate that there is a shortage in production of the good or service. Losses indicate that there is an overproduction of the good or service.


fff9c1  No.12060899

>>12060852

When I was in Engineering school, I noticed the Chinese, like the Iranians, cheated every chance they got.

I noticed in the IEEE journals, they just regurgitate someone else's paper.

I noticed in physics Grad school, the Chinese students not only cheated, but played the race card to get out of cheating and corruption that would have gotten a white man expelled.

yeah… your picture is the result. Non whites can cargo cult us, but they don't grasp the concept of principles and ethics.

Fucking baby eaters.


577f34  No.12060901

>>12060666

>corporation abuse laws made by government

>government gloss over glaring abuse

<BUT GUISE CORPORATIONS ARE LIKE REALLY BAD


7aeef6  No.12060908

File: fbb992478df0d11⋯.jpg (172.82 KB, 800x778, 400:389, flat,800x800,075,f.u1.jpg)

Most mass transit is essentially free. The average fare price in America is $2.50 however the average cost to actually transport that person is $8.00 add to the fact that all cities give away free passes to the elderly, handicapped and poor. Most of the operation exists to collect federal funding since, outside of NYC, public transportation is not an effective way to get people around cities built for cars.

t. I work in mass transit


a6a87b  No.12060909

Without the pork and deliberate inefficiency of the current government things would not be nearly as fucked as they are. Just look at the fucking railroads; the government said "we'll pay you however much it takes to get this done" and as a result of that the railroad companies deliberately started working as inefficiently as possible to stay on the government gravy train and our infrastructure is still fucked up a hundred and fifty goddamn years later. This kind of shit happens everywhere, all the fucking time, and is the reason America gets a worse return on its infrastructure spending than virtually anywhere else in the first world.


e06b91  No.12060934

>>12060885

I'm not going to webm an hour long video for you, twit.


d1b58f  No.12061027

socialism is not a bad idea in a pure ethnic nordic society


efcf0d  No.12061104

>fasco-communist

Nazbol pls leave


51e723  No.12061163

>>12060887

I don't think abstracts are important to society. They're certainly lower in importance than purely biological and ecological considerations.


bcf17c  No.12061171

>>12060899

Pajeets do the same, which is why you now have pajeet doctors in the West who don't wash their hands and reuse needles. Diversity is our strength.


5fec07  No.12061183

>>12060565

Interstate hwy system?


000000  No.12061204

Mass public transportation could never work in the USA because it's a shitskin magnet. It's better isolated at best in regions or highly ethnic homogeneous places like Japan and even in Japan I witnessed personally our own whites causing trouble and being outright embarrassments on the train system. You can look up the videos on jewtube if you don't believe me, they're not violent subhumans like niggers but fuck that shit is cringe why do they do what they do. Why can't people just act civilised in public anymore? Clown world.


75b3f5  No.12061232

File: 44f1afede3bd49b⋯.gif (352.1 KB, 256x256, 1:1, 44f1afede3bd49bb4d48a86313….gif)

>>12060901

>Muh laws

Doesn't address mega-corporations drowning out their competition with massive marketing budgets or flat out buying their competition out. Doesn't address corporations pressuring others to do what they want.

What are you going to do? Ban companies from buying others out? Put a cap on marketing budget? Force businesses to do business together?


e6e311  No.12061235

>pay taxes

>government officials use them for fat retirement funds and lavish lobster dinners

>give what's left to niggers

>charge people to use the trains they paid for


c24108  No.12061253

The cost of rail travel in the UK has gone up rapidly ever since it went private and taxes are every bit as high as ever, same with Royal Mail, how has the free market helped the public in any way there?


324f75  No.12061261

We need something like this, it's ridiculous to see tens of thousands of cars all lined up at the same destination. We just need to deal with the subhumans like the homeless and non-whites to make it usable for humans.


324f75  No.12061265

File: 38a48dc56796e4d⋯.webm (9.99 MB, 640x360, 16:9, Libertarian_Party_Cringe_….webm)

>>12060777

Filter and report libtards.


bcf17c  No.12061266

>>12061261

That's basically how things are in parts of Europe that aren't full of multikulti. Even rusted out Soviet buses and microscopic pajeet Tata buses in Ukraine are more pleasant than American public transportation for this reason.


7cdd53  No.12061388

>>12060517

Do they have any idea how much it costs to maintain public transportation in part n' parcel cities? They get trashed and vandalized to shit daily and require a tax payer funded army of maintenance workers to keep it clean.


e2e42d  No.12061446

>>12061204

A very large chunk of the "whites" in East Asia are jewish, so it seems, especially in Japan (ZOG armed forces notwithstanding).


6029c1  No.12061473

>>12060517

it could be done, and maybe have some good results, in a big city…if you do your homework and see if you can allocate the necessary money out of your budget and make sure vandals and loiterers are mercilessly buttraped when they do what they do.


6029c1  No.12061519

>>12061265

>dat ending

these people are unbelievable.


5acf5c  No.12061542

>>12060517

Honestly in florida we have the tri-rail and it costs like $7 per trip and it runs on time and everything is pretty well maintained. Making it free sounds retarded but having it be as expensive as amtrak is equally retarded.

Cars are important to maintain independence which is why banning them or similar is dumb. The problem is being 100% reliant on them is even dumber. One of America's biggest issues is urban sprawl and poor planning which is almost always a result of the reliance on cars that people have, in cities at least it makes a lot of sense to have buses and train that can eliminate traffic and planning cities around that would make getting around a lot easier plus be better on the environment.

The reason this will never work in the US is because of multi-culturalism making it entirely undesirable to actually use those transportation systems. That, combined with corporate control over everything (see national city lines for that) makes this impossible.


a65e6e  No.12061546

Here in Chicago the it's a paid system and the infrastructure is ancient and broken and every train car is full of bum piss or worse. Go watch some more (((Libertarian))) free market videos. Or lurk more and learn something. Seriously, I thought these retarded posts would end when school started back up?


3ce137  No.12061619

File: fe10b76b5ced2d9⋯.jpg (26.7 KB, 401x372, 401:372, 1439403645527.jpg)

>>12060517

Making mass transit free is bad idea there are already drug addicts and homeless begging for bus money at the stops, this will decrease ridership because there no mechanism stopping them from getting on the bus


494080  No.12061626

>>12060565

>Goldstein should own EVERYTHING!


f97bf7  No.12061633

File: be2a3c8c18b77e9⋯.mp4 (15.29 MB, 640x480, 4:3, free_train_rides.mp4)

>>12060517

send him this


2d8bd6  No.12061743

>>12060882

>I rode the bus for awhile.

>It's as expensive as gas and car insurance.

We're not talking about inter-city Greyhound.


449eb0  No.12061851

>>12060532

Haha you mad nigger?


ac6ea4  No.12061962

>>12060517

>>12061388

May be off-topic but I have an idea. In the future white-only ethnostate utopia we need a themed bus where a hologram of a pack of niggers get on the bus with you and take over part of it. Children will point and laugh at the hideous representation of a giant alpha turbonigger shouting nonsense while surrounded by betas grunting in response. Near the end of the presentation a 300 pound she-boon will spontaneously get up and twerk her enormous ass, providing much comedy for the entire family.


0c3bc7  No.12062012

File: f05d8e30bde38d9⋯.jpg (41.5 KB, 1252x1252, 1:1, sbb.jpg)

In other news, Switzerland's installed public transport system is mostly funded by taxes. Operational costs are covered by tickets. Construction of public transport access (stations, lines, rails) are covered by either the federal level on public credit (and never paid back, hello and thanks to foreign-fags who buy swiss bonds) or paid directly by Cantons (taxes, credits) or communes (mostly direct cash flow, in that road renovation includes adaption to public transit.) Yearly fare tickets are subsidized in some regions to lower costs, but also to ensure their renewal. Most who have one renew every year, thus securing cash flow for the whole system. The most fucked are business travelers and idiotic tourists who buy per "official" channels. They pay for each tiny piece of communal share of what is being subsidized, i.e. from Geneva to Zürich one way 200 Swiss Francs, while those with yearly tickets pay 11-something per day for the whole country.

Tickets keep the riff raff out. There are many very high earners commuting first class city to city (a one hour-ish commute). They would not accept a nigga quota of 20% - which this would mean in a few years - constantly ruining trains and buses and they would switch to cars, which would congest roads to a standstill. This is the first problem. Another is cash flow. Non-state income can give the system some leeway to postpone investment or vice versa, if nothing has to be fixed they can make provisions for years when the state can't invest, because a huge share of funding happens yearly by commuters. Free transport means the city will cut reinvestment exactly when it is mostly needed. They - especially leftist governments - always deny this, but when push comes to shove they all do this. I am not arguing Keynesian economics but the exact opposite. In a slump, those public transport provisions have a bigger buying power because labor is priced lower. When there is an upturn those investments pay off instantly, because commuters will use those lines - after all at first they are empty during the slump. Because it is financed with income, it isn't surtaxed with interests and because it flows into labor, it mostly remains for a while within the area where the transport is being built.

What bothers me the most: Every metropolitan system on this planet can do this. You can begin with buses which fucking travel on time and extent the system slowly and some day you have a London style tube. Well, any city with a population above IQ89…

>>12060609

Basically this. But you can lay trams in a manner which hinders them to even consider going there. Many Swiss cities have a curious transportation map. That was against workers quarters, but it will also serve against them. Look it up.

>>12061253

You pay for the rest. And gender studies majors in public offices.

>>12061266

I shat brick. http://www.tatamotors.co.ua/

>>12061962

No. What on Earth!!


fff9c1  No.12062013

>>12061743

>buses aren't mass transit.

Oy vey, Rabbi. Good job in making /pol/ look retarded.

>>12061962

Then they play their loud rape the white boi music, pull hair, and when you call 'em "niggers", they beat you to a holographic pulp and brag how they did a good thing.

Because that is what Negroes really do.


fff9c1  No.12062026

>>12062012

A swiss system would work if we had swiss people and not Negroes and Mesoamerican primitives, Anon.

What works in the parts of Europe that have not been colonized by Islam will not work in the United States.

Otherwise, yes, the Swiss system may be a good example.


bcf17c  No.12062095

>>12062026

It's funny, some libtards try to use Switzerland as an example that "muliculturalism works!". Yeah sorry but there's a vast difference in compatibility here in peoples. And even then in Switzerland it's common to see say German and French speaking groups in towns segregate themselves and live across a river or something.


73a73e  No.12062346

>>12061163

>I don't think abstracts are important to society. They're certainly lower in importance than purely biological and ecological considerations.

If you're selfish and don't know economics, you may not necessarily care that everybody gets what they want (through the free market). But you certainly care that you get what you want, including what you consider "purely biological" considerations, right? So getting what you want is kind of important if you're not hypocritical, and it happens that needs and wants of the people drive the society's socio-economic, scientific, and technological progress. I'm sure you enjoy your toilet, microwave, and air conditioner, right?


1c1e18  No.12062348

>fasco-communist

yet another civnat cuckold trying to promote fuckery here by associating fascism with communism

fuck off


73a73e  No.12062349

>>12061104

I am an anarcho-capitalist, not a Nazlbol. Sorry if it wasn't clear enough, but the fasco-communist I was referring to is the author of the YouTube video.


73a73e  No.12062356

>>12061183

The thing about private highways is that, on the one hand, there is that fasco-communist screeching about who will build the roads, and on the other, the government slow-walks, excessively scrutinizes, and tries to deny private companies the right to build highways.


73a73e  No.12062369

>>12061232

Can't buy a company out if its majority shareholders won't sell. If you don't want your company to be taken over, don't sell the majority of your shares to people you don't trust.


2bd4ef  No.12062377

>>12060901

>corporations lobby government for regulations that strangle out upcoming competitors

I'm sorry but there has to be some kind of balance, a completely free market is as trustworthy as a government with complete control

you put undue trust in the hands of either extreme with the assumption that they'll have your best interest at heart


49e422  No.12062380

>>12062349

>I am an anarcho-capitalist

So you’re mentally disabled.


fff9c1  No.12062413

>>12062349

>I am an anarcho-capitalist

Capitalism requires the government to protect the right of the individual to keep his property against theft.

Anarchy rejects the hierarchy of government.

Your claiming to belong to an oxymoron philosophy that contradicts itself.

Very edgy, but just too needed. It screams "I'm saying something stupid so you'll talk to me".


f947ab  No.12062442

>>12060517

OP is a faggot.

Nationalise mass transit companies, meaning that they get their money from taxes and not by tickets making them 'free'.

At the same time privatise the highways and streets.

This will mean that the people will stop driving cars and go on to use mass transit: trains and busses.

Without cars, oil demand goes down ruining the Saudis and the USA since the US-Dollar is only worth what the Saudis sell in oil.

(This will only work in Europe)


73a73e  No.12062620

>>12062348

Sorry, but people that try to disassociate the twin leftist ideologies are some of the few people that aren't making any arguments here. It's like if your a Sunni Muslim and you screech at the idea that Shia Muslims are Muslims too.


75b3f5  No.12062737

File: 4c96043aa2571bc⋯.jpg (114.08 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, 4c96043aa2571bc6df9651d910….jpg)

>>12062369

Good in theory, but nobody has put it to practice. Not even the fags behind DICE, who keep starting up new companies just to sell them to EA. And you didn't address

>Marketing

>Business Relation pressure

I didn't even mention the SJW lynchmob acting completely out of ideology, slowly infiltrating companies then taking them over until you have a fucking cult with tons of power labeling anyone who stands against them as Nazis and blacklisting them from events + other underhanded measures. Try starting a game studio. If you aren't able to manipulate SJWs (and they'll know you're not one of them), then you will be starved of any networking/exposure harder than Ron Paul in the 2012 election.


75b3f5  No.12062745

File: 26716caac4164e5⋯.jpg (153.46 KB, 792x612, 22:17, 2a187bbf764e9af500d4c1541f….jpg)

>>12062737

That wasn't even the picture I wanted to post.


fe1261  No.12066143

>>12061633

>>12060578

>>12060633

>>12060807

>>12060860

Stop linking to Jewtube you stupid cunts.


9a5080  No.12066306

>>12062442

its what the japs did and now half their traffic is trains

imagine that, only having enough cars that the roads can actually hold instead of flooding the streets with v8 mobility scooters so everyone can be free to sit in traffic everyday


282c9f  No.12066348

File: 9764bf4a5e3d4b9⋯.mp4 (2.96 MB, 206x360, 103:180, High_rise,_low_quality_bad….mp4)

>>12060852

I think they're making buildings out of compressed dirt.


7322bf  No.12066369

>>12066348

looks like a poor concrete mix meant to be used as a cold joint, cold joints should be avoided when dealing with structural designs, they will most likely patch it with some concrete filler and a spade, lazy bastards


78cadf  No.12066486

File: cee3b9195da6caa⋯.jpg (34.36 KB, 790x444, 395:222, 56f97bc5c3618844388b4596.jpg)

File: 5d02b667cc7bd0a⋯.jpg (37.84 KB, 468x322, 234:161, china_bridge2.jpg)

File: 4c83f06a74b495c⋯.jpg (59.9 KB, 400x266, 200:133, 0013729e45180ca4e8af01.jpg)

File: 99b8ac7e295126a⋯.jpg (29.38 KB, 381x484, 381:484, trash-bridge.jpg)

File: 57a3dbf891e4094⋯.jpg (27.26 KB, 530x352, 265:176, 57355__468x_shanghai-rubbi….jpg)

>>12066369

>he hasn't heard of chinese sand buildings

>he hasn't heard of chinese trash construction

These are not metaphors.

Actual high rises made of compressed sand with a thin skin of plaster or concrete.

Actual bridges and buildings made using actual trash including painted styrofoam for rock and garbage bags of paper for filler.

Portland cement is expensive, so how do you cut costs to maximize profits? Eliminate Portland cement!

Laissez-faire fags are unable to acknowledge that Chinese quality is their end game along with it's customary levels of corruption.

I would redump all my chink webms, but that would be boring.


6406ba  No.12066814

>muh capitalism

Get the fuck out of here, Republican.


2ad1a6  No.12066849

>>12060601

>monopoly

Stop right here, capitalism is all good and dandym until you get monopolies. A monopoly is the worst thing for a free market, it has no competition, thus no inventive to improve their products and you get stagnation in development, decrease in quality and unreasonable prices. Monopolies also usually have enough influence to meddle in politics, further decreasing consumer rights, safety standards and, in case of food producers, health standards. Capitalism is like freedom, you need rules and regulation, otherwise its just anarchy.

Therefore I am for government regulation of water, energy and transit infrastructure. It can be, and possibly should be privately owned, but it has to follow government regulation and oversight to prevent abuse to the detriment of the population.


7a0b88  No.12066891

>>12066486

Using some styrofoam concrete is actually a legit way of making insulating walls, it was invented in Serbia (or Bulgaria?) and works pretty well as long as you don't use it for structural members and make the wall with the same amount of concrete. For example, if a wall needs 1 ton of concrete, you add 5% styrofoam to it, and still use 1 tons of concrete to make it… it should be structurally sound. The walls will be thicker in volume, because styrofoam takes up space, but it shouldn't be weaker.

I think the Chinese heard about this method, and then just decided they could use 100% styrofoam to make a bridge.

That's insane.


5477be  No.12066954

>>12060517

Maybe my POV is too much shaped by living in krautland but nonetheless

> public transit

> private business, only involvement of state is owning a lot of shares of it

> ticket prices for all stretches tripled within a span of 10 years

> 80% of their revenue (not profit) is invested in setting up failed train networks in china that proved incapable of competing with what the chinese have to offer

> rest of revenue goes into real estate projects aimed only at selling 3rd/4th/5th holiday penthouse flats to richfags and the money made is not invested but goes straight into bonuses for the board

> giant fucking prices on everything

> mass transit infrastructure and vehicles inadequately maintained and deteriorate in spite of high prices

> public mass transit gets replaced by uber-ripoffs and buses in spite of high prices

I'd say make it free and crash the fucker with no survivors.


57ec8d  No.12067071

>>12066486

Kek, Leon Degrelle wrote about this during WW2 in Russia. This must be some commie shit


f97bf7  No.12093851

>>12066306

>>12062442

>privatise the highways and streets

>not understanding the interstate system is specifically built with straight sections every 5 miles to serve as shitty landing strips to fight the chinese.

you can't privatise it.


ed0c6d  No.12094252

>>12060517

Read about it - inadequate funding etc happens when they turn private.


a41506  No.12108167

>>12060517

>Make mass transit free

Gypsies move into the trains and have 16 children per woman, no room for passenger, try to get on and get your self a 9mm gypsy curse

>Make mass transit free

Niggers move into the trains, create drugdens. 20-25 'customers' on location per. drug dealer. Try to use it for transportation, get a .50 cal nigger reply - dual wielded.

>Make mass transit free

People only use it for the intended purpose, travel to and from work. Bring their kids for a trip in the park. And the city prospers and flourish.

(((One of these is true, happens every time. Right fellow white people?))). That'll teach those goyim rail road barons what happens if they keep Gods Chosen People out of a lucrative business*


d0d9da  No.12108501

>>12060578

>What's wrong with the government building roads?

Because it just lets politicians build roads to buy favors. Whether it's a small-time politician trying to get a few more vote sin his congressionalo distric by building/repaving a road that only 50 people use, or it's Gary Johnson building a massive highway out in the desert that no one uses just so he can give the contract bid to a construction company owned by his friends and pay for it all with taxes.

Roads cost a massive amount of money to maintain, and the only reason (poor) people drive so needlessly and frequently is that to them, it's free. THey don't have to pay for the service they sue, so they never stop using it, so we get more congested roads, less safe roads, and eventually just more roads to try and compensate. of course the over-building of roads causes great environmental damage and isolates/chokes out ecosystems.


a0785e  No.12108690

That would be fine. Just need to get rid of the subhumans, and maintain a homogeneous white population that cares about maintaining its living space and standards.


ed9910  No.12109544

>>12060517

Doesn't look that much different than all the rest of the communist programs. Look at the free starbucks bathroom policy…sure its free but nobody wants to use them anymore because there are homeless people all over them and in them now.


201219  No.12109597

>>12060530

this

For some fucking reason they only put the rail line in East Houston (nigville)!! Guess what its already dirty and none of them even pay for a ticket. So guess what soy commie faggot we do have free mass transit and its fucking intolerable because of the feral animals


a9dc15  No.12109609

>>12093851

>not understanding the interstate system is specifically built with straight sections every 5 miles to serve as shitty landing strips to fight the chinese.

That's weird, cause the Alaskan highway was built with the absence of straight sections specifically so Asiatic invaders couldn't use it as a shitty landing strip.


320219  No.12109801

>>12060517

>The city is abandoned by poorfags

>Detroit 2.0

How is that Detroit 2.0, those are the only people who didn't leave


a41506  No.12110614

>>12109801

I think anon ment

>poorfag workers

A class miles above poorfag welfare niggers




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / britfeel / caffe / femdom / firechan / flutter / had / marx / rolo ]