[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / fast / mde / scat / tacos / vg / vichan ]

/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Politics, news, happenings, current events
Winner of the 68rd Attention-Hungry Games
/d/ - Home of Headswap and Detachable Girl Threads

January 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Comment *
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

<The 8chan Global Rule>
[ The Gentleperson's Guide to Forum Spies | Global Volunteers | Dost Test | FAQ ]

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

45dd08  No.12102373

Constantine the GAReat

21 October 335

>If a Jew has bought and circumcised a Christian slave or one belonging to any other religious community, he may under no circumstances keep the circumcised person in slavery; rather, whoever suffers such a thing shall obtain the privilege of freedom.

9 March 336

>Some time ago a most salutary sanction of our constitution was promulgated, which we now make doubly noteworthy by the repetition of our law. If any Jew has acquired a Christian slave or one belonging to some other religious community, and has not shrunk from circumcising him, let the circumcised person, according to this decree, attain his freedom and enjoy its privileges. It is not right that a Jew who has circumcised a slave of this kind should keep him in slavery

13 August 339

>If any Jew should suppose that he should purchase the slave of another sec or people, such slave shall be immediately vindicated to the fisc. If the Jew should purchase a slave and circumcise him, he shall be penalized not only with the loss of the slave, but he shall also be visited with capital punishment.


>https://books.google.ca/books?id=BXuxAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA37 (Jews and Christians in the Holy Land, 1999, Gunter Steinberger)

>https://books.google.ca/books?id=tdKCAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA185 (History of the Jews in the Greco-Roman World, 2003, Peter Shafer)

This guy was amazing, and raising awareness of him will support a trifecta of also raising awareness that:

>Jews kept slaves in the modern era

>Jews gave forced circumcisions to the non-consenting

>Christians didn't just protect other Christians from Jewish slavery/mutilation, but members of ANY religious community.

I'm not a theist or anything but despite that I can really fucking appreciate this guy and the Christian spirit. He's inspirational. He should get a national holiday. Are there any downsides I'm overlooking to celebrating him?

ef200f  No.12102387

File: 18826ecbd01df33⋯.jpg (71.06 KB, 600x400, 3:2, burg arras.jpg)

Constantine was a good man. He gifted castle Arras in Germany to my family long ago.

f78d44  No.12102403

File: 7fc3dfcb841279d⋯.jpg (86.19 KB, 663x677, 663:677, jesus_christ_basil_ii__con….jpg)

File: 36aece964727332⋯.jpg (404.08 KB, 1500x730, 150:73, image00853.jpg)

He made some of the first Christian money.

21f0fd  No.12102410


Cool fact, but these are some funny faces.

f78d44  No.12102420

File: a17d41b93441794⋯.jpg (615.93 KB, 897x1000, 897:1000, Pentecost_13th-c-missal_Ea….jpg)


The faces of the ancient clergymen in the illuminated missals are charged with earnest belief.

a1cdcc  No.12102423

Modern christians only care about larping as jews.

45dd08  No.12102427


Perhaps the majority, but I wouldn't say that applies to all moderns. Man, I bet the Jews engineered the fall of the Roman empire because they were pissed about not getting to slice up their slave dicks and drink the blood anymore.

36269b  No.12102437


Can confirm


It sure does

Every last sect including judaism lite aka mormonism

c45520  No.12102454


Damn, unironically based. Neat fact, thanks OP.


Mormonism isn't Judaism lite, it's more like the coopted nepotism from the Jews and created their own rival sect. Nothing wrong with taking the Jews tricks and using it yourself, in fact we should be doing that more often.

21f0fd  No.12102469


>Nothing wrong with taking the Jews tricks and using it yourself

Aside from becoming a cancerous "white sharia" fag.

320cd1  No.12102470

Do not forget how Emperor Constantine suppressed anything that challenged Christian Orthodoxy (Not the current Orthodox Church - Biblical Scripture in general) including non-Christian places of worship, as well as the works of heathen writers, and even those of other Christian denominations (Sectarian disputes are integral to Abrahamism). Not to mention how he authorized the destruction of 'pagan' temples - their vandalism and desecration by building Churches grew widespread.

36269b  No.12102471


In their baptismal fonts they have 12 golden bulls symbolizing the twelve tribes of pissrael and their garb and religious rituals inside the temple is 100% Masonic and 100% semitic. Moloch worship. Ritual canibalism. Kike worship.

82520c  No.12102483

Think they’re still butthurt over this?

I assumed there’d be a Constantine mini-series like Rome and Spartacus considering he killed his wife and his son plus they could take shots at Christianity as usual along with a bunch of gratuitous sex and violence

0a2bd8  No.12102484

Constantine & Charlesmagne were both controversial figures due to Christianity.

ecd354  No.12102486


Run out back and get me a picture of that canyon

53390b  No.12102487

File: e6c975b006fa6e5⋯.jpg (239.17 KB, 736x899, 736:899, 2da4c4a3354804d7522cfc6f5f….jpg)

"Christians were Jewish slaves! The half-pagan Emporer Cuckanstien said leave their dicks alone!"


ecd354  No.12102495


And here I thought all he did was fight the devil himself and save humanity. I hardly knew he fought for the foreskin of slaves across his great nation!

ecd354  No.12102504


ID+ filtering you pharisee

f78d44  No.12102513


The Jews probably influenced his son's successor Julian The Apostate, who tried to rebuild the Temple for the Jews, he probably only did that because the Jews had turned the Empire into a bablyon hell hole and he thought putting them back in their place would make things OK, but with Jews you lose, anyway he couldn't get the Temple rebuilt anyway.

320cd1  No.12102516


No. (((They're))) not. Honorable men like Seneca the Younger and Cicero are the anti-Semites that the Jews still hold grudges against - not someone who kickstarted the destruction of pre-Christian Rome.

53390b  No.12102517

File: d9beff13de9b8fb⋯.jpg (466.13 KB, 1044x991, 1044:991, 2342q42244.jpg)


>ID+ filtering you pharisee

Good, slave.

6c0dfd  No.12102551

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


>Mormonism isn't Judaism lite

Have you read the Book of Mormon?? It's Judaism 2.0! Its about a lost tribe of Israel going to the Americas via underwater wooden subs, across the pacific. Where they wrote their story on gold colored tablets where Joseph Smith found them and translated them using a rock in a hat….

It's a false religion, Joseph Smith was a con artist that had to skip states to keep from being jailed.

82520c  No.12102562


“Kickstarted” He saved the establishment of the decaying corrupt empire by moving it to Byzantium closer to the wealthier provinces and more defensible then Rome . Constantinople would last another 1200 years

320cd1  No.12102582


He burnt a dying corpse of an empire that followed its native faiths, and built an empire of Abrahamism out of its bones and on its ashes - and needlessly hurt and killed loyal followers of native faiths in the process.

a6b381  No.12102592


You're praising him for letting them keep non-jews as slaves at all.

That's pathetic.

82520c  No.12102670


He reunited a empire that’s been racked with constant civil war , brought a common faith that would unite all of Europe (albeit periodically) and built a nation that not only withstood the endless onslaught of barbarians but was the only beacon of light during the Dark Ages

80a6be  No.12102699


A traitor. Julian the Apostate is far more praise-worthy; he tried to turn back the tides and save the skinking ship of Hellenism and his main flaw was being too tolerant of Abrahamism.

9f3d80  No.12102703

File: d24e598e1556421⋯.gif (1.37 MB, 620x400, 31:20, shut-it-down-gif-11.gif)


The thing that makes it judasim is the whole banking fraud/sexual perversion business. JS was just another mohamed who wanted a crack at the jewry business.

d00bee  No.12102707

File: 9f4ead065cf3fda⋯.jpg (8.79 KB, 188x268, 47:67, Hadrian in military gear.jpg)

bump for Constantine.

But he wasn't the first Roman emperor to take the jews to task for their relentless fixation on mutilating dicks. A surviving edict from the emperor Hadrian documents him taking legal action against all such cutting kikery, with the exception being for themselves. In other words, Hadrian's law said if the jews want to slice and dice the dickheads of their own sons, that's OK… But the jews have to leave everybody else - their slaves included - the fuck alone.

The jews - perverse even way back then - hated Hadrian for that law.

6c4cea  No.12102734


>only killing jews in this instance.

half measure.

000000  No.12102760



LOL, this thread is so lowkey christcuck. Christianity is shit. Romans were persecuting jews long before Christianity, and judaism was corrupting Rome long before Rome was Christian. the only constant is that jews always try to subvert Europeans, be they christcucks, atheists, or even pagans. Jews just fucking hate Europeans. That's all there is to it.

320cd1  No.12102769


>Christianity united Europe

The 30 Years' War would like a word with you.

52395f  No.12102772


>Something that happened 1300 years later

991907  No.12102789

File: f786f45b3b4975e⋯.gif (1.96 MB, 500x200, 5:2, notconstantine.gif)



Glad you remembered.


45dd08  No.12102811

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

The interesting thing about the date of the edits is even though he would auto-free slaves who were circumcised in 335, this was so fucking ineffective that he had to up the punishment to execution of slave-circumcisers in 339.

4 years of depriving Jews of their property wasn't enough to stop them. Jews were willing to lose the cost of a slave if it meant forcibly circumcising them. Jews were basically using their wealth to try and force non-Jews into Jewish society. Once mutilated, they were so traumatized and outcast that they figured they had nowhere else to turn and were subjugated by their Jewish abusers even after being freed.

Jews has the perspective "I'm still expanding the Jewish ranks, and I can always buy new slaves" so Constantine's death penalty was the perfect counter, because even if they managed to turn their slave to Judaism through this sexual assault, it would not increase the amount of Jews so long as the mutilator was tried in court after the 1st victim but before they could abuse a 2nd.

Of course, the problem there is, you'd probably have Jews buying dozens of slave and mass-circumcising them simultaneously. This is why Constantine also made it illegal for Jews to purchase non-Jewish slaves. They could be immediately rescued by the government.


I dun goofed guys, Constantine died in 337, it was one of his three sons (Constantius II) who made the change in 339 to further increased inhibition of Jewish slave-abuse by preventing them from owning non-Christian slaves and executing those who circumcised them.

He was born 3 August 317 so when his dad died in 22 May 337 he was only 19 years old. Considering he passed this law on 13 August 339, it took him under 3 months to accomplish it.

This is pretty impressive considering he was probably grieving, and it was complicated sharing powers with his older bro Constantine II and younger bro Constans.


Fair point, that's the sort of fair perspective I've posted this to inquire about. That said, do you have any non-Jewish sources for these claims? It occurs to me that with Jewish involvement in our Academia that his antagonizing the Jews could've led to him being falsely blamed for things he didn't have a hand in, similar to Hitler.

For example: what if some of the destruction of pagan temples was done by Jews and then blamed on the Roman government? Just a thought.

The wiping out of Greco-Roman religion bothers me just like the wiping out of the Norse religion, I love the sex and violence and polytheistic anthropomorphisms in those things. So to whatever degree Constantine was involved in it, being aware will temper my admiration for his persecution of Jewish slave-mutilators and humanize him as a flawed human being.


>I assumed there’d be a Constantine mini-series like Rome and Spartacus

Perhaps the March 2018 launch of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine:_City_of_Demons could help generate some interest?


I think the mistake that Constantine made, and one later repeated by the Spanish, is the acceptance of Jews who allegedly converted to Christianity. This led Rome and Spain to be infested with Crypto-Jews, instead of fully expelling them.


Jews are not the tribe of Israel. Despite the post-WW2 naming their pseudonation "Israel" they are descendents of the tribe of Judea, ie the Pharisees.


Fair point, he became emperor in 324 so it took 11 years for him to fucking DO something. I have no idea how busy he was.

The actual hero, upon further analysis, is CONSTANTIUS THE SECOND

My apologies for the mistake folks, similar names and I didn't notice the transition there.

750db2  No.12102830


>Not to mention how he authorized the destruction of 'pagan' temples - their vandalism and desecration by building Churches grew widespread.

Already answered and most destruction came from temples under Kitos war and i am not talking about human sacrifices, seriously, if your brother was tortured or killed there you wouldnt give a fuck about that place being an archaeological site in the future.

000000  No.12102857

The jews are always slavers, they are still slavers. It is only whites who free people from their slavery and that is what they fear most.

320cd1  No.12102888


>sex and violence and anthropomorphisms

Do you actually believe Europe was a continent of savages before your specific brand of (((YHWH))) worship arrived?

Not to be disrespectful, this is just something that needs to be asked.


I implore you to look into it yourself and bring back your findings on the subject.

Here is a link I've found, but I won't write up about it since I need to sleep.



Let's not forget all the early Christian sects that were denounced as heresy and subsequently persecuted. Gnosticism, Arianism, Docetism, etc. were all subject to sectarian violence which is a hallmark of Abrahamic faiths. Divide up the believers and get them to murder eachother over interpretations and baseless accusations - that is the way of the worship of (((YHWH))).

320cd1  No.12102907


>Kitos War

I'm not talking about the destruction of Jewish temples, those don't even count as 'pagan' anyway since they were devoted to (((YHWH))). I'm specifically talking about the destruction of pre-Christian Hellenistic temples.

c9c8d5  No.12102919


>Every last sect including judaism lite

Notice how he sneakily tries to weasel in 'muh kike on a stick' even though the OP BTFO out his Something Awful meme.

45dd08  No.12102926

File: 49dad4414da3dfe⋯.jpg (171.36 KB, 1198x1457, 1198:1457, triple.jpg)

Guys I have been reading some more





It seems like Jewish objectors about Jesus being messiah according to THEIR doctrine may be right. So if he was not the Jewish messiah, what is the real religion he was the messiah for? Was he a better 3-D chess player than Trump and and co-optied their religion, dividing their followers and and supplementing them with non-Jews to disrupt Jewish dominance?

Much like Trump paying tribute to the wall, letting Jews in his administration, pretending friendship with Israel by moving embassy, while Jesus did not sway ALL the Jews, it seems like he did recruit a large number of them to follow him, and did an impressive amount of damage to the pseudoIsraeli PHARISEE sons of Judea.

The actual Jewish Messiah is supposed to be a son from the paternal line of David. Jesus' stepdad Joseph (the husband of Virgin Mary) supposedly fit that bill, but whoever Jesus dad was (Zeus? Odin? Hercules? Thor? Marduk? Gilgamesh? The Doctor? Tesla?) c-c-c-combo broke that by cucking Joseph: he deflowered his virgin bride and then had Joseph feed and clothe him. By the time Joseph actually had a son with Mary (Jesus' half-brother James) Jesus' real dad had already infected Mary with his DNA so that subsequent children would be genetic chimeras of Jesus' dad and later sperm contributors.

I am interested in the possibility of exploring non-Abrahamic Christianity, the worship of Jesus but as a non-Jewish messiah who simply played amazing mind games and memetically disrupted the Jewish religion and stole their shit. Does this offend/interest anyone? What problems would this pose in re-interpreting Christian faith?



No not really, I don't think that's what Greco-Roman or Norse religion was all about, just regurgitating Abrahamic-prejudiced stereotypes so as to not alienate the christfags with my fanboy fascinations. I actually know very little about them outside their stats in Pantheons of the Megaverse.

But since we are now talking about Constantius II and not Constantine I, could you tell me the worst he did in relation to the pagans?

c9c8d5  No.12102932


>Christianity is shit

Europe would already have been Islamized without it, faggot fedora.

c9c8d5  No.12102934


>co-optied their religion

Jesus went against the Pharisees teachings, so no.

320cd1  No.12102947


Last post before I hit the hay.

Islam wouldn't exist without Christian scripture. Not only that, but Christian Byzantium and its wars with Zoroastrian Persia weakened both to the point where they were both vulnerable to Islamic conquest.

ecd354  No.12102948

File: 39c3146deb6e7a4⋯.png (1.87 MB, 876x7073, 876:7073, Jew-Does-not-exist.png)




Pharisees = modern day jew

If you're trying to say that Jesus followed a religion, the pharisee is pouring out of you like saliva out of a retard.

Jesus is the Christ. He IS the religion.

He would have dragged trump into the street and beat him like a dog if he could see that traitor wearing the satan hat and standing with the imposter tribe.

If you're trying to D&C, here's your chance. No Christian that knows the truth will stand for that shit. To Christians, trump just bowed to the devil. He's done.

d36b71  No.12102956

>freed the slaves

>this is /pol/

000000  No.12102963


>if our jewish bullshit had not conquered Europe then this other jewish bullshit would have conquered Europe

Cool fuckin story faggot. You are wrong, but even if you were right Christianity would still be shit.

000000  No.12102966

Great Constantine's fault was that he was unable to kill the number of Jews that Emperor Hadrian had (over 4 BILLION according to the Talmud).

fe1f55  No.12102974

File: 0bd85dc978e2794⋯.jpg (570.68 KB, 1536x2048, 3:4, real life jidf.jpg)


this is (((polvol)))pol

same christkike shit every day

45dd08  No.12102989

File: 521f980fa1ba5d7⋯.png (136.29 KB, 800x995, 160:199, AD122.png)


>went against the Pharisees teachings, so no.


>If you're trying to say that Jesus followed a religion, the pharisee is pouring out of you like saliva out of a retard. Jesus is the Christ. He IS the religion

What you guys are saying is basically what I'm trying to say. I don't think he was following the Jews/Pharisees, but that he was crafty in how he rejected them so as to convert their followers who were hoping for a Jewish Messiah without them actually wising up that they were following a different religion's messiah.


checking Hadrian the WALL king

You sure the Talmud didn't say SIX billion? Jews are prone to exaggerating the numbers of their dead by several decimal points. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bar_Kokhba_revolt only says 580,000 dead Jews and is the only Jewish-Roman war to have occurred during his reign, so where would the additional 4,999,420,000 come from?

087cfc  No.12103043


you can have a slave without mistreating it anon. why beat up a workhorse that you paid for? because you're a sadistic jew

750db2  No.12103065


Thats the point, check the zones attacked by jews.


Tel Aviv poster detected.


Debunked meme posted again, nice try schlomo.


>Islam wouldn't exist without Christian scripture.

Of course, islam was a weapon created by them to fight christianity, all "gospels" supporting islamic views can be dated between the Kitos war and talmud creation, of course you dont have memes about that, christianity is strong enough to endure barbarii and teach them to behave like decent human beings.


Its curious how Jesus received all roman attacks without retaliation, but he expelled merchants from the Temple.



>i lose and i have no argument, therefore i would gonna tip my hat

Atheists every time they lose the argument, people like you killed europe, you are the cancer ruining the world.


Serious question, why jews are so obsessed with the number of the beast?

b32e80  No.12103070


>he seriously believes the christkike D&C and well proven lie

>he hates kikes but believes everything they tell him to

Why anon? Is that you in the picture?

b32e80  No.12103077


>Abrahamic faiths.

>Christianity is a jewish religion

despite it existing for nearly 2000 years before the cult of Satan became organized enough to be considered a religion.

despite that being proven wrong innumerable times on /pol/ alone.

b32e80  No.12103080



Fuck off nigger.

ecd354  No.12103096


> without retaliation, but he expelled merchants from the Temple.

Hanging from a cross is "without retaliation" to you?

He was framed by the merchants, stood before pontious pilate and was crucified. The merchants told the romans that jesus was informing them not to pay their taxes, when he stood trial he stated, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesars and God that which is God's" meaning, the merchants lied about him telling the Judeans not the pay the Roman Empire.

45dd08  No.12103109


>most destruction came from temples under Kitos war


> I'm specifically talking about the destruction of pre-Christian Hellenistic temples.


> check the zones attacked by jews.

750db2 are you referring to something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitos_War#Cyrenaica ?

>In Cyrenaica, the rebels were led by one Lukuas or Andreas, who called himself "king" (according to Eusebius of Caesarea). His group destroyed many temples, including those to Hecate, Jupiter, Apollo, Artemis, and Isis

Did the Jews take over these locations? Were so many polytheist temples destroyed that 'pagan temple' could've been code-speak for "Jewish temple" ?

>Debunked meme posted again, nice try schlomo.

I came up with the proposal on my own, but I don't expect I'd be the first, so could you please link me to the debunk so I can get more educated about Jesus? I'm not sure which aspect of my post you're referring to. I'm not really trying anything except ideas on how to decouple the merits of Jesus from the Jewish ties thrust upon us.

>Its curious how Jesus received all roman attacks without retaliation, but he expelled merchants from the Temple.

We know Zeus went around deflowering virgins all the time so imagining Jesus = Jupiterson Heraklesbro GMH


pretty sure when the poster you're replying to wrote "received all Roman attacks without retaliation" he is referring to Jesus not retaliating against the Romans, not that them crucifying was not retaliation against what Jesus did (although I doubt it was, wasn't this basically Jewish influence on the Roman government which did it?) ie whay you mention about the merchants. This was the Jews retaliating against Jesus, not the Romans retaliating against them.

Jesus didn't retaliate against Romans probably because they treated him decently except for the end, and even then he probably saw the Jewish hand at play there.

cb7ee8  No.12103153

File: 9ccdcafcd3a6171⋯.jpg (200.95 KB, 800x537, 800:537, constantine army.jpg)

File: c1f7dc74375bb22⋯.jpg (12.66 KB, 220x284, 55:71, you didnt listen.jpg)

File: 5dfb071eb2e9263⋯.jpg (98.72 KB, 780x438, 130:73, history repeating.jpg)

Thanks Constantine!

45dd08  No.12103171


why is the nose always the first to go? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Busts_of_Constantius_II

it's like the Jewish-stoked mobs are pitted against attractive noses

d1465a  No.12103225

File: fa758ae22528c2c⋯.jpg (410.54 KB, 783x1149, 261:383, Antiokhos_IV.jpg)


So you're saying that Constantine didn't ban the jewish religion outright like he did with every other belief system in the Roman Empire? Wouldn't he have known the jews killed Christ? Were the jews such a useful group of people that they couldn't have been banned from the empire or forced to convert? Why did (((they))) get a special place in his empire?

"Under Constantine the Great Jewish clergy were given the same exemptions as Christian clergy."

Cucked from the start. The only enemy of jews are those in favor of their physical destruction such as Antiochus IV. But just like Constantine he cucked out, thinking there were "good jews" and paid it with his empire.

>>"But the all-seeing Lord, the God of Israel, struck him with an incurable and invisible blow. As soon as he stopped speaking he was seized with a pain in his bowels, for which there was no relief, and with sharp internal tortures" -2 Maccabees

750db2  No.12103274


> so could you please link me to the debunk so I can get more educated about Jesus?

Sometimes you sound like a meme supporter of a roman emperor creating all of this, but islam was that creation, just check dates of books, maybe i am wrong because ids arent that accurate.

>750db2 are you referring to something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitos_War#Cyrenaica ?

Yes and no, like the holofun is overrated i have no reason to think that the massacre there wasnt underrated, remember that islam is related to talmud if we check dates and christians have a custom of not destroying, but recycling temples, also check how every source of data is being destroyed, from "terrorists" destroying statues to huehue monkeys fires and Sweden Yes! melting proofs.


The only legit Ben Garrison meme talking about jews have the nose destroyed…

0a2bd8  No.12103278

>Jesus didn't fight back when romans capture him

>Jesus flogged jews

This isn't hard to excuse, in fact, it makes Jesus look even worse, the money lenders are a bunch of old ass jews with no weapons, while the romans wear iron sword and shield, of course pussy Jesus just gives up.

026360  No.12103603


Almost solely a protestant issue. Catholics have their own problems.

026360  No.12103607


Property rights couldn't be violated arbitrarily.

026360  No.12103612


>oy vey, going against jews is evil

>look, he didn't even practice violence on the goyim!

Stay mad forever, kike.

c0fa71  No.12103616

File: 08286708e355974⋯.jpg (35.25 KB, 555x371, 555:371, nath4.jpg)

>Oi Veh dis antisemitic shmuck stopped us from cutting our slaves dicks off

>We demand reparations from not only Italy but the Catholic Church!

>Hollywood should immediately begin a "Shindlers List" about the evils of Constantine and the Christian persecutions

>Oi my gal bladder is becoming agitated

>howls in hebrew

5f7845  No.12103624


A jew converted to christianity, holding christ on a stick. Protesting against kikes. The absolute timeline we are in…

bf2802  No.12103644


Yeah, that's exactly what I meant. Instead of being like evangelical Christians and saying "the Jews are the chosen ones, were just the goyim and we need to give our live to serve the Jews" Mormons just say "nope, we're the real Jews." And reap all the benefits of treating themself as such. They don't cuck out and say they're not God's chosen people.


Lol imagine still being butthurt about Jesus whipping your fellow money lenders 2000 years later.

d8e6bf  No.12103676

File: 0be68749b13c3f4⋯.mp4 (4.03 MB, 1484x1272, 7:6, caesar-wept.mp4)


At a certain point Rome really wasnt even Rome anymore and if you were the emperor its because the place was so fucked up youre the jackass who got the job, and you likely only fucked it up worse. Constantine was clearly one of those asshole emperors in a declining time who converted the whole empire to Christianity trying to hold it together, due to its failings, not because it was a good religion. Im not anti-Christian in general but Constantine a shit.

d18e46  No.12103679

>let's free shitskin cuz they had their pee pee cut.

>But see how we BTFO the jews come fuck my daughter lamarcus.

Christianity sucked ass and still suck ass.

d8e6bf  No.12103681

File: 24982ca3523cf6d⋯.jpg (116.89 KB, 1224x932, 306:233, constantine.JPG)

File: 3e40f1bd28f69c4⋯.jpg (105.25 KB, 1240x857, 1240:857, directly-after-constantine.JPG)




d8e6bf  No.12103691

Big improvement, thanks constantine and your lineage for breaking up the empire and causing this to happen by the time it reached the third constantine.

d8e6bf  No.12103692

File: 7cdfd2012d7e009⋯.jpg (93.52 KB, 1233x772, 1233:772, constantine3.JPG)

1ec358  No.12103705

File: 41206dfd096a2b4⋯.jpg (119.81 KB, 615x600, 41:40, Stanze_Vaticane_-_Raffaell….jpg)



4a6bd5  No.12103902


>like he did with every other belief system in the Roman Empire?

Constantine didn't ban paganism, he just legalized Christianity.

026360  No.12103917


>let's free shitskin cuz they had their pee pee cut.

Low energy kikelet protecting his own suffering.

For the record, black men aren't the only slaves, and were quite rare in Roman Empire.

026360  No.12104091

Jews are trying to bury yet another anti-circumcision thread? Hah, your shame is for all to see.

708936  No.12104120


Proofs ?

3771b2  No.12104165


>Constantine didn't ban paganism

No, he just banned the practice of 'paganism' (This is a slur word and you ought to know that by now. It has the same meaning to Christians as the word 'goyim' does to Jews - and both are cancerous Abrahamic concepts)

17f8f8  No.12104305

File: 6ff7734b7bf7e2d⋯.png (188.72 KB, 398x307, 398:307, (((you))).png)


Interesting thread once again made shitty by fairy fucking, uneducated pagans/ cosplayers, (I mean fucking come on >>12102487 it's this kind of shit that get your friends/ family to laugh at you)… Congratulations mates your rocket science on the subject is about up to slate.com "157 things you didn't know about…" Your rabbi must be proud

c53627  No.12104403


It's a shame. I think the board as a whole was getting wise to it a few months back and they then stage an invasion by "/christian/" that got everyone even more confused. The saddest thing is the complaints in this thread aren't even real nor do they apply to Constantine. He was very tolerant of pagans and actually knew relatively little about Christianity, although judging from his letters his faith was real and wanted to learn more. It also backs up the image of jews that we know to be true today, and shows that it has been a thing for a long time - Biblical scripture shows the same thing, but when we have extra sources its even better.


If you look into the actual ancestry of Jesus and the related prophecies its pretty incredible. If I remember correctly Jesus has to be of the blood of David, and from the family of Solomon; and he is related by blood to David through Mary whose line goes through Nathan, whilst he is related by family to Solomon through Joseph; and the thing is that it the royal bloodline of Solomon is corrupted due to Jehoiachim who God cursed with 'none of your blood shall ever be King'; making it nearly impossible for the Messiah to be born unless he came through one of David's other sons, but he simultaneously has to be of Solomon's 'family'. The genealogy stuff is actually a ton more confusing and, in my opinion, seriously convincing argument for Jesus when you look into it. If Joseph were his blood parent he would actually be unable to the Messiah due to Jehoiachim's curse, and yet if he was not his adopted son he could not be of the family of Solomon.


Jews started the war between the Sassanid and Roman Empire. They reached out to the Sassanids and asked them to take Jerusalem, they opened the gates when the army arrived and to the Sassanids shock and horror; paid obscene amounts so that they (the jews) could personally torture and execute the Christians from Jerusalem. They enslaved the rest and took lots of loot, as well as the true cross of Christ (which was the symbol of Rome) back to Ctesiphon. Losing the symbol of Rome at the time unsurprisingly forced Heraclius to start a war to reclaim it or else essentially accept the fact that his Empire was defeated. After the two sides had largely annihilated each other with the Romans eventually winning, Mohamed came out of his desert with his horde and found both Empires bankrupt and with much of their armies dead; so when you see those 'impressive' early victories of the muslims, remember it is because they were fighting largely untrained young boys and elderly men, many of whom were not well armed (afterall it was incredibly difficult and expensive for Heraclius to arm his forces for the war against the Sassanids and they had to melt down a lot of artifacts and relics just to afford it). So yeah, the jews started the war between the East and West that allowed for the muds to gain a foothold in the world; and that's not even talking about how they then helped the muds in myriad ways.

7007e6  No.12104436


What does Christianity have to do with it?

447643  No.12104795


Extending serfdom for another millenia, what an achievement! I guess you would say the same if Hillary Clinton had "propelled the USA into greatness".

754aef  No.12104873


Christians would bicker about their cult even when a battle would be beginning.

c53627  No.12104911


What you are disingenuously referring to is the Germanic desire for purity in all things. It doesn't matter if its Christianity, Fascism, National Socialism, Democracy, Communism, or ANYTHING - Germanics pursue purity in all things. They detest corruption and hypocrites more than anything. Unsurprisingly in Germanic nations this meant that Christianity became Protestantism, which in turn for many became even more 'pure' and formed the Puritans and myriad other Puritanical sects like the Amish, Mennonites or Anabaptists. Look at how the Leftists eat one-another over perceived hypocrisy. Look at how people here, and in the mainstream media criticise politicians or historical figures. Look at how we talk about National Socialism and Fascism.

It doesn't matter what it is, Germanics will endeavour to find its most pure form. They will oppose anything they consider to be corrupting, and any individual they believe to be a hypocrite. It is a defining feature of our people.

6c0dfd  No.12104947


>Jews are not the tribe of Israel.

That's a tad wrong, you contradicted yourself.

Abraham -> Issac -> Jacobwhose name is changed to Israel -> twelve sons one of whom is Judah

Jews are Israelites, but not all Israelites are jews. BUT this also means they ARE NOT the chosen people because the Abrahamic blessing was passed onto Joseph, Judah's brother. Now modern day jews are related the the Khazars and Ottoman Turks, and they may call their state "Israel", but this is part of their con.

They do have a claim to a "piece" of Palestine, but it'd only be 1/12th, not the whole area, mainly the kingdom of Judea, which would be a middle portion just below Jerusalem.

c53627  No.12104965



2 Kings 17:7-20

Malachi 3-4

Mark 12:1-12

All of Israel is disinherited in 2 Kings. Malachi (the last book of the Old Testament) gives those dwelling in Judea a final chance to repent. Mark 12 is Jesus pronouncing judgement upon Judea in a parable where He says that they are disinherited and replaced with a new people because they rejected Him.

None of Israel's descendants matter anymore. They are all disinherited and only those who followed Christ are saved. The geographical once-home of those people, even if it does belong to their blood ancestors (which as you point out with the Khazar and Ottoman stuff is unlikely), also does not belong to them anymore by their own Holy Book and God's decree - so they are not even entitled to that 1/12th.

52395f  No.12104980


Constantine also fought a civil war to unite the empire. What's your point?

99dbdd  No.12104982




026360  No.12104992



Romans aren't known for their hatred, but their law. Kikes are the angry ones, with numerous failed uprisings and a spiritual binding.

>What does Christianity have to do with it?

He made Christianity legal and he was a Christian himself, applied the Christian ban on circumcision on the slaves of jews. This meant that jews could cut and harm themselves all they pleased, but it wasn't profitable for them to harm others. Imagine the terror those poor jews went through.

026360  No.12104994



Swedes were pretty insignificant, but those around them were better off without Sweden being a thing.

cacced  No.12105002


>muh white sharia bad

The main thing wrong with "white sharia" is the retarded name, just use pater familias.

99dbdd  No.12105010


People in these threads always consider all non meds as snowniggers.


And the beekeeper suits manlets like sperglin probably want to put women in.

d2b3a8  No.12105023

File: 96e28f4e7016e6a⋯.png (470.82 KB, 900x714, 150:119, 96e28f4e7016e6af3056b90bb7….png)


If /pol/acks care, then why do we sit by where this man's namesake, Constantinople, sits in the hands of fucking turkroaches?

cacced  No.12105028


>And the beekeeper suits

I dislike hijabs and burkas as they aren't from our culture but women should be dressing more modestly instead of like a bunch of sluts. There's plenty of more modest western clothing designs than is the popular fashion now.

026360  No.12105124


Because, anon, there are unfortunately more pressing matters, such as our own survival and the destruction of our oldest institution and sacrament, marriage.

The jew must pay.

59a574  No.12105167


When you say "Constantine the GAReat" is that some sort of typo or are you making a reference to the Roman condiment known as "garum?" (Garum was a sort of fermented fish paste that was popular in Roman society)

Regardless, all abrahamic religions are poison.

They are all the rotten fruit of the poison tree that is "judaism" or "jewish history" or "jewish people" or "jewish culture" or however you want to put it.

Christianity has some good points, but it is a slave religion that promotes obedience and "civic nationalism."

It is good mixed with poison.

The rest (judaism, islum, freemasonry, marxism, luciferianism, satanism, holocaustianity, others) are all UTTER SHIT.

Reject the jewish mind virus.

Escape the plantation.

Just say NO to abrahamism.



Towards the end, Rome was a CivNat shithole held together by slaves and foreign mercenaries.

It was not worth saving. The Byzantines managed to hold on for another thousand years by leaning on the powerful and extensive Greek people in the Eastern Mediterranean. Of course, the same bullshit carried on and the Greeks were gradually ground away.

The Romans fell into the "CivNat" trap and allowed their ACTUAL DEMOGRAPHIC PEOPLE to dwindle and be bred out of existence.

Thus they fell to ruin since CivNat is retarded shit and a "diverse" country has nothing "real" to hold it together.

All White peoples need to LEARN from this.

Embrace Volkism.


Circumcision before the age of majority (usually 18 years) should be UTTERLY banned unless there is some CRITICAL medically relevant reason for it (deformity perhaps),

It is a hideous and vile practice.

If 18 year old idiots want to get themselves cut, then go ahead.


That "ancestry of Jesus" narrative just sounds like bad fiction to me now.

Strange how it all looks so silly once you leave the plantation.

Totally agree about the jews being monsters, however.


No. Christians and jews are killing Europe.

Who was that one guy kissing muslum nigger feet……..

Oh yeah. The Pope.

>>muh not real Pope!!!!!!!

Whatever. There are plenty of Christian "charities" of numerous denominations that are HEAVILY involved in importing shitholers into White countries.

After all, we are ALL God's children, right?




"White sharia" is exactly as retarded as ANY form of "sharia."

That is to say that it is UTTER BULLSHIT.

Feminism must be reigned in, but via a return to WHITE tradition, not desert shitholer bullshit.

cacced  No.12105219


>desert shitholer bullshit

Sharia is not much different from various western policies that served the same role, the kneejerk reaction against such policies is due to it being conflated as purely a muslim thing due to historical ignorance and remnants of several decades of jewish propaganda. I mentioned pater familias to remind people that a structured system to keep women in line is not foreign to western culture as many falsely believe.

99b563  No.12105279


Well, looks like we have a new Wolfsschanze.

99b563  No.12105308

File: 14c8b835c107853⋯.jpg (66.57 KB, 506x506, 1:1, death.jpg)


Minting coins with a manual hammer press, and a die that had to be hand-carved doesn't lend itself to accuracy, so I applaud their efforts, given what tools they had at their disposal.

53f06c  No.12106056

File: ea4356c06daf4dd⋯.jpeg (97.56 KB, 770x834, 385:417, 5a443fe1ed72f.jpeg)

If anyone's interested in watching Keanu Reeve's 'Constantine' movie, it's torrentable on yts.am

It's reallllly good if you substitute the demons for Jude. Awesome movie nonetheless, but knowing he's blowing the fuck out kike ideology is pretty good. One of my top non-kiked movies of all time.

5dfb58  No.12106176


2000 years ago or so Christianity was just another sect of Judaism and nothing more. It's only fitting that nowadays a lot of influential Christian preachers (Brother Nathaniel, Pastor Anderson) are Jews themselves. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

4aee5c  No.12106286

Constantine was a piece of shit.

097902  No.12106874


you try minting some coins by hand with no tutorials.

168c1c  No.12107328


Sometimes I wonder if that's what your rabbi teaches you filth.

Christianity marked the death of Judaism. Old vs New. Out with the Old in with the New.

“Behold, your house is being left to you desolate!” Matthew 23:38


You serve a false God pharisee.

a1cdcc  No.12107343


we wuz da real jews n shit

80a6be  No.12107509


It is an objective fact that Jesus was a Jewish schismatic.

000000  No.12107556


The word of God says so, Babylonian Satanist.

750db2  No.12107675


OY VEY!! the post.




*tips fedora*


He basically allowed the world to go beyond the big filter


I know that atheists just love to tip their hats, but going against all knowledge discovered by Europe in the last 500 years is just too much.


Thanks for the info, seriously, this board its filled with paid shills and fedoras.


You wish they have ottoman/tatar blood, most of the jew rulers are german mostly, this is why they cant create a race killing virus (remember bio weapons experiments from WWII).




Thats pretty accurate, just check what happened with snowniggers once they dumped christianity, the difference is that now muslims dont have to work for buying blondies.


d2b3a8  No.12108787


>our own survival

You realize that this would be the rebirth of an empire that would halt half the flow of shitskins into europa, yes?

45dd08  No.12108959


>"Under Constantine the Great Jewish clergy were given the same exemptions as Christian clergy."

I can see you nabbed that off https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great_and_Judaism

There's no actual source for it though

WTF is "Cameron, 107" ?

Also read the entire thread, I'm the OP and we've moved on from Constantine II, the actual guy who passed the order was his son

Constantius II


>you sound like a meme supporter of a roman emperor creating all of this, but islam was that creation

You're going to have to explain your ideas more clearly, are you saying Islam is related to Zeus?


> money lenders are a bunch of old ass jews with no weapons

Source? All the paintings I see of 'Cleansing of the Temple' the moneylenders look young and fit and probably had hidden knives.


Are you complaining about the empire being split up after Constantine I died? That's because he had 3 young sons in early 20s who initially agreed to share power, which is pretty fucking responsible.

Of course, eventually the youngest/oldest went to war and winner of that got killed by usurper, so Constantius who was chilling down in Egypt came up and kicked ass and then handed empire over to an Apostate upon his deathbed like a boss. Probably realized Jews were infiltrating them too.


In defense of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_(emperor) he tricked the Jews into paying for the temple then had his man spend the money building it on top of a fucking VOLCANO so he was probably trying to trick the Jews into a deathtrap but it blew too soon.


> knew relatively little about Christianity, although judging from his letters his faith was real and wanted to learn more

He probably thought Zeus was Jesus' dad and respected him as evidence of jew-cucking.

> Jesus has to be of the blood of David, and from the family of Solomon; and he is related by blood to David through Mary whose line goes through Nathan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary,_mother_of_Jesus#Genealogy refers to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luke_3 to support https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_(son_of_David)#New_Testament

John's justification is fucking convoluted though:

>One ought also to observe this, that the law was that when a man died without seed, this man's brother should take to wife the wife of the dead man and raise up seed to his brother

>on the death of Mathan, Melchi, of the tribe of Nathan, the son of Levi and brother of Panther, married the wife of Mathan, Jacob's mother, of whom he begat Heli.

>Therefore Jacob and Heli became brothers on tile mother's side, Jacob being of the tribe of Solomon and Heli of the tribe of Nathan.

>Then Heli of the tribe of Nathan died without any children, and Jacob his brother, of the tribe of Solomon, took his wife and raised up seed to his brother and begat Joseph.

>Joseph, therefore, is by nature the son of Jacob, of the line of Solomon, but by law he is the son of Heli of the line of Nathan.

45dd08  No.12108960

I'm still not sure what that has to do with Davidian ancestry of Mary TBH. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus#Maternal_ancestry_in_Luke implies that John is saying Luke dun goofed and it was Matthew's patrilineage which was the accurate one.

Next section has quote from rabbi Elijah via prince Adronicus:

>Why do Christians extol Mary so highly, calling her nobler than the Cherubim, incomparably greater than the Seraphim, raised above the heavens, purer than the very rays of the sun?

>For she was a woman, of the race of David, born to Anne her mother and Joachim her father, who was son of Panther.

>Panther and Melchi were brothers, sons of Levi, of the stock of Nathan, whose father was David of the tribe of Judah.

So basically Mary's dad's dad is PANTHER? The divergence section phrases it:

>Levi begat Melchi and Panther: Panther begat Barpanther, so called. This Barpanther begat Joachim: Joachim begat the holy Mother of God.

This has an added intermediate generation.. Both agree that Mary's dad is JOACHIM but this says Joachim's dad was BARpanther, son of Panther.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi has no mention of Melchi or Panther though. ???


>jews could cut and harm themselves all they pleased, but it wasn't profitable for them to harm others. Imagine the terror those poor jews went through

Not enough, because obviously they were still doing it despite losing their profits (automatically freed slaves) which is why after Constantine I died his son Constantius II had to up the ante and execute the Jews who kept circumcizing their slaves so they would stop. They were obviously buying up slaves solely for the purpose of circumcising them. Mutilating the dicks of the non-consenting and feeding on their blood is one of Jews' primary drives, more important to them than money. Money is simply a means to this end.


>When you say "Constantine the GAReat" is that some sort of typo or are you making a reference to the Roman condiment known as "garum?" (Garum was a sort of fermented fish paste that was popular in Roman society)

It's a reference to the "GAR for Archer" meme. It's a term of appreciation.

>If 18 year old idiots want to get themselves cut, then go ahead.

The minimum age should actually be whatever minimum age we have highest for other stuff. In the US you need to be 21 to drink so that would be more reasonable than 18 for elective surgeries. This applies to trannies as well. An extra 3 years for the brain to mature before allowing irreversible mutilations is very reasonable.

3c6cf1  No.12109021


It's a literally fact that he was a Christian who called the Jews, literally, the "Synagogue of Satan"

857f0f  No.12109198


I guess when jesus called out the pharisees and sadduccees those weren't sects of judaism. Your disinformation isn't working.

99dbdd  No.12109201





Christcuckery in a nutshell.

99dbdd  No.12109207


It is the equivalent of saying "only Zionist jews are a problem". Jesus had no problems with jews who converted.

59a574  No.12109229


First of all, the fact that so many of you "christians" apparently believe that anyone who rejects abrahamism is automatically a "fedora tipping" atheist is telling.

Most "abrahamists" can only see the plantation. They think that outside is only crazy people and fedoras. Typical.

Also, White achievements and White greatness are due to WHITE PEOPLE, not "christianity."

Seondly, the idea that a "fall of christianity" is the cause of modern "leftism, globalism, kikeism, multicult" and so forth is ridiculous. Numerous christian groups have been HEAVILY involved in the destruction of traditional White society and the importation of shitholers into White countries.

Of course, christianity and it's universalist values are NEVER to blame, right cuck?


Exactly which christian denomination of significant size is explicitly pro-White and supportive of White Nationalism?

Certainly not "catholicism" with it's nigger-foot-kissing pope.

e9cdc7  No.12109386


>Christianity has some good points, but it is a slave religion that promotes obedience and "civic nationalism."

This. Even if you dismiss the arguments about its jewish origins and influences, the religion is still inherently cucked because of subservience to God The Constitution! instead of your people, and its egalitarian views on souls and converts.

Being against Christianity is one of the largest redpill hurdles one is able to do. It's been instilled from birth, and even when one starts to doubt parts of the status quo that is told to them, people still cling on to it as a form of kosher values because it is an anchor to the normalsphere that most people have heard of. Everything about your modern life from birth has been kiked.

45dd08  No.12109411

Christfags, I've been digging into the Gospel about this lineage BS, how do you resolve this discrepency between Luke and Matthew seen in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zerubbabel#Zerubbabel_in_the_New_Testament and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genealogy_of_Jesus#Zerubbabel_son_of_Shealtiel ?

I have trouble telling the 4 bros apart so can someone educate me on who is more reliable here? In most cases they seem to be emphasizing the lineage of (Saint) Joseph (Mary's cucked husband) so why exactly does this even matter if they're saying he didn't plant his seed in her and was only Jesus' stepdad? It's like they knew everyone would just assume Joseph ejaculated in Mary to create Jesus and did it as some kind of pre-defense. Why would biological lineage of non-biological dad matter?


>2 Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;

>3 And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;

>4 And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;

>5 And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;

>6 And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;

>7 And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;

>8 And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;

>9 And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;

>10 And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;

>11 And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:

>12 And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat ==Zorobabel==;

>13 And ==Zorobabel== begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;

>14 And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;

>15 And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;

>16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.


>23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,

>24 Which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi, which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Janna, which was the son of Joseph,

>25 Which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Amos, which was the son of Naum, which was the son of Esli, which was the son of Nagge,

>26 Which was the son of Maath, which was the son of Mattathias, which was the son of Semei, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Juda,

>27 Which was the son of Joanna, which was the son of Rhesa, which was the son of ==Zorobabel==, which was the son of Salathiel, which was the son of Neri,

>28 Which was the son of Melchi, which was the son of Addi, which was the son of Cosam, which was the son of Elmodam, which was the son of Er,

>29 Which was the son of Jose, which was the son of Eliezer, which was the son of Jorim, which was the son of Matthat, which was the son of Levi,

>30 Which was the son of Simeon, which was the son of Juda, which was the son of Joseph, which was the son of Jonan, which was the son of Eliakim,

>31 Which was the son of Melea, which was the son of Menan, which was the son of Mattatha, which was the son of Nathan, which was the son of David,

>32 Which was the son of Jesse, which was the son of Obed, which was the son of Booz, which was the son of Salmon, which was the son of Naasson,

>33 Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,

>34 Which was the son of Jacob, which was the son of Isaac, which was the son of Abraham, which was the son of Thara, which was the son of Nachor,

>35 Which was the son of Saruch, which was the son of Ragau, which was the son of Phalec, which was the son of Heber, which was the son of Sala,

>36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,

>37 Which was the son of Mathusala, which was the son of Enoch, which was the son of Jared, which was the son of Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan,

>38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

I swear I'm gonna make a fucking Excel spreadsheet to compare this shit some day.

80a6be  No.12109709


And? Accusing others of being affiliated with the devil is par for the course in virtually all abrahamic schisms. It doesn't change the fact that Jesus was explicitly a Jew by birth and raised in the Jewish religious tradition - from whence he split. Christianity is an extremely successful Jewish heresy as practiced by gentiles and no amount of wishful thinking or mental gymnastics can get you around that.

a1cdcc  No.12109751


>Why would biological lineage of non-biological dad matter?

because christianity is a sect of judaism for gentiles, the ones who care about it are jews. The nly answer you're ever going to get is "we wuz da real jews" or "we jews now" and at the same time, you're going to be told "there's no such thing as jews any more"

79f533  No.12109823


Does it really take a jew to understand concepts?

c53627  No.12110018


It's generally accepted that Luke's genealogy details the ancestry of Mary, which as said before goes through Nathan making her a blood relation of David without being part of the accursed direct lineage of Solomon (which is cursed at "Jechonias" as quoted in your part (Jeremiah 22:30 Thus saith the Lord, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah. ) - his curse was that his blood would never be King, making it impossible for Joseph to be the blood relation of Jesus - although he is still needed for Solomon).

a1cdcc  No.12110092


go pray to yahweh about it.

9f3d80  No.12110103


Joseph was the rightful heir to the Throne of David, but his blood was cursed so that neither he nor his descendants could sit on it. However, if he adopts a son, (he did) that son is both first in his household and free of the tainted blood, and thus is eligible. Doubly so if that child is a grandchild of David by his mother's lineage, which he is.

This follows an established legal pattern:

Exodus 2:10; Moses was adopted by Pharaoh’s daughter, receiving all the rights, privileges and duties of a biological son, being educated as a prince.

1 Kings 11:20; Genubath was brought up by the queen, and was said to be among the sons of Pharaoh.

7139bb  No.12110134

Cicero spoke out against (((them))) as well.

7139bb  No.12110150


Steven Anderson is a Jew? Proof?

ec39d2  No.12110165

Rome was one of the biggest achievement (if not the best) of mankind. I hope that once the jew problem, the shitskinning problem is resolved, we can ever aspire to something at least as great as Rome, Sparta and The 3rd Reich.


You just doxed yourself (if you did not lie, internet…)

dc985c  No.12118334

Yeah yeah the cristucks are totally based, and they totally did something real to fight the jews i buy your stuff (((OP))).

85d077  No.12118372


>Jews were basically using their wealth to try and force non-Jews into Jewish society.

jews. gonna. jew.

e30c62  No.12118399


Sparta was fairly shit tier.

It wasn't the strongest or most developed city state.

It's entire citizenry were soldiers while all industry and crafts were relegated to slaves and women.

Not exactly an ideal situation.

750db2  No.12118655




3As I urged you on my departure to Macedonia, you should stay on at Ephesus to instruct certain men not to teach false doctrines 4or devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies, which promote speculation rather than the stewardship of God’s work, which is by faith. 5The goal of our instruction is the love that comes from a pure heart, a clear conscience, and a sincere faith



/intl/ memes in a nutshell.



>everything i dont like is abrahamist

Check culture, history, etc, if you arent a pajeet then you are just another troll or irrelevant.

>white men is magicall

No, again, read about history, the history of white man is rise & fall every century untill christianity came, if it wasnt by christianity germans would be a bunch of inbreed shitskins and America would be a legend.

>christianity destroyed civilization

No, exactly the opposite, if you check how many civilizations had fallen then you will notice that the "great filter" is real and that christianity can push people beyond that.

Stop the disinfo please and go back to stormfront, stay there and never go back please.


>jewish heresy

Tel Aviv ip detected, christianism is so orthodox that pharisee were forced to create a new book called talmud.


Dubs confirm, Sparta was destroyed by a bunch of pedophiles and surpassed in every other sense by a bunch of flamboyant faggots, they were so fucking stupid that they werent capable of moving outside their city.

5964b1  No.12118685

File: e00311431375df2⋯.jpg (135.99 KB, 853x861, 853:861, anderson.jpg)


Watch "Marching To Zion". He admits to having Jewish parents, Jewish friends and relatives. He's another Jew who simply converted to Christianity to keep Whites in the dark. He's views on race are kosher as fuck.

c53627  No.12118740


>endless genealogies

This was a specific complaint leveled at the people in Ephesus. You are supposed to be interested in Christ's genealogy as it is a proof that He is who He says He is. I imagine the people in Ephesus were missing the point of Christianity and instead trying to trace their lineages back to the tribes of Israel (afterall a lot of people in the region would have blood from some of the tribes that were conquered and then consumed by Assyria).


What it actually says is that his grandmother has Ashkenazi blood. His parents are not jewish, his friends are not jewish, and there is no evidence to suggest that his Ashkenazi grandmother was actually jewish either. It is also entirely possible that it was thrown in as a typical 'trick' where they try to convince us all that we are part nigger, spic, chong and yid in an effort to 'combat racism'.

You can be against him marrying to people of a different race but spreading lies and distortions helps no one.

fb6a6d  No.12118775

File: a070c4290db72b5⋯.webm (4.81 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, Anderson DNA-Test.webm)

File: aba392cc25df62a⋯.webm (880.37 KB, 640x360, 16:9, wholeburntoffering.webm)


Have a video of his DNA-test, kike isn't even in his top 50 and some burned offering as a bonus.

fb6a6d  No.12118781


Yeah, just look at how much better things are now that Christianity has lost most of its influence.

How all those multicultural hellholes in Europe turned into proper white nations and all that.


443e5f  No.12118866

File: e72d2530ec03aed⋯.jpg (137.86 KB, 603x758, 603:758, 0d7d5d_34641fd9dea34969a05….jpg)


A good argument that I've heard is that even though these kosher nationalist claim that Jews are based for bringing up how Jews fight Islam,they completely ignore/don't bring up the Jew's role in the Islamization of Europe.

Funny, what exactly makes a jew based? "Based jew". What's a normal jew, or "non-based" then? rhetorical questions.

It's rather interesting to see these people who love how so many Jews are "based" for being anti-islam, but they suddenly want to murder you and your parents for stating the Jewish role in turning Europe and American non-white.

c53627  No.12118897


Anderson is anti-jew. You cannot call him 'kosher'. /pol/ is not happy about his views on races outside of jews as he sees it as irrelevant, but the guy is from a religious perspective very anti-jew and anti-muslim. It's only our version of 'virtue signallers' who hate him (and shills), as even if we disagree on a few points - he has a lot of ideas that we agree with, and can definitely be used to wake people up to certain truths. He made a whole video debunking the holocaust and has been banned from half of Europe.

4b0e8b  No.12118969

>muh constantine

Mongolians banned circumcision to jews and muslims and also halal/kosher food.


dbb477  No.12119097

>make a law that creates incentive to get your slave baby circumsized

>jews now have people coming to their doors begging for their services so their sons and daughters can move up in class

>trade their services while also gaining favor from the bottom rungs of society in due of "debt"

>few generations of this and you have grown men with freedoms in society who have their origin stories tied with the liberation from the jew, the then most hated thing in society

Its literally a cycle where once youre nearing the end of your epic in expelling parasites you have a new breed of fresh minds coming into the world only viewing the ass end of the tragedy, and so comes the traitors in our midst who believe it unjust, and especially when theyre under the psychology that if not for their mother letting the jew snip their skins at birth then they would be nothing but slaves in a world that has birth rights. It fucking mirrors our current crisis

9757dc  No.12119113


He still promotes White genocide by bashing racial pride and marring White women to niggers. 1000 priests like him and even the most racially homogeneous society would be transformed into a miscegenation orgy with godly Christian niggers and their mongrel offspring running around. No Jews needed at all. Christians do Jews work for free. They simply use different talking points to justify it. Christians will make sure White race dies off, sacrificed on the altar of faith.

60aca1  No.12119124


They killed people who slaughtered animals in the Kosher/Halal way. It was demanded that livestock be slaughtered the Mongol way (which is far more humane in that you crush the heart with your hand instead of just letting them painfully bleed out like the sandniggers/kikes do)

c53627  No.12119178


That's some ridiculous conclusion you've come to. He is not PRO- miscegenation, he does not go out of his way to marry whites to blacks, he simply marries people who come to him. He is not trying to cause everyone to become mixed - he just personally doesn't care. And that is certainly something you can object to, but to extrapolate from this that he wants to 'genocide whites' is ridiculous.

He might be wrong on somethings in your eyes, but he is not trying to destroy your people and much of what he does serves to protect your people. The idea that you have to agree with someone 100% on absolutely everything is a retarded 'progressive' concept. I can guarantee you that there are very few if any people on /pol/ who agree with one-another on EVERYTHING, and that's good. We agree on the core things.

Pastor Anderson clearly agrees with a lot of our core beliefs. He is radically opposed to judaism, islam, atheism, communism, homosexuality, transgenders, the nation of Israel, abortion, fornication, usury and he has openly spoken out debunking the holocaust. He is not a /pol/ack, but he is a very useful asset for us.

99dbdd  No.12119219


That happens to a people whenever their religion dies. See the last days of pagan rome; degeneracy, freeing the slaves, etc. Christianity isnt that unique in this respect. In a couple hundred years, when islam starts its death spiral, the same thing will happen to them.

99dbdd  No.12119227


>christian pilpul

>defending some faggot pastor this hard

60aca1  No.12119231


>radically opposed to… atheism

That makes him wrong in this one regard. Our atheist brothers deserve respect.

c53627  No.12119241


Who'da thunk it? People on /pol/ defending a holocaust denier?! What-ever is the world coming to? …


Not rising to it because I think we have derailed enough. If you really think atheism is a good thing then I suggest you look into how it came about in the West.

9757dc  No.12119243


>he simply marries people who come to him

>he just personally doesn't care

That's precisely the problem right there. Miscegenation is the greatest sin against nature itself and a weapon used by Jews and their shabbos goys to kill the White race. Christians don't understand that and see no problem with niggers marring Whites. A Christian preacher marring a White woman to a nog and claiming "we are all of one blood" and "we're all mixed" is equally as bad as a Jew stating "there's only one race, the human race" or that the "White people don't really exist". It's a genocide and pastor Anderson willingly takes part in it proving once again how Jewish Christianity really is. When even the most based of Christians is just another civnat in all but name with some harder stance on Jews then Christianity has no place in White society at all. Anderson opposes Jews for all the wrong reasons because kikes don't want to mix with based niggers and as he puts it "the Jews are ones who pride themselves in their race and think they are purely Jewish" / "My philosophy is nothing like theirs". He dislikes Jews because Yids put their own well-being above all else, have no problem with their own racial pride and don't want to mix with niggers. All the thing good Christian like him finds abhorrent. What a great role model to follow.

60aca1  No.12119273


atheism has always been around since the days of the ancient Greeks, bro. Probably long before too. There have always been people who are satisfied with what their senses tell them, and need nothing more.

99dbdd  No.12119287


bbbut what if the black is BASED and of the faith? ;^)

c53627  No.12119391


I don't like miscegenation but it is not the greatest threat to our survival. Demographic replacement and the inevitable war that comes after is the biggest threat by a long way. Very few people race-mix. I see exposing the lies of the jews, particularly the holocaust, as one of the best things anyone can do for our side because it all begins to unravel after that; and then immigration, miscegenation and everything else gets confronted. Think about your own red-pilling; it began with something important to you, and then you realised how all these other things were affected and slowly but surely you realised more or less everything was wrong. You need to push that first domino for the rest to come tumbling down though; and there is no better domino that than the holocaust.


Has it though? The greatest of the Greeks believed in monotheism; Aristotle, Plato, Antisthenes. Most humans today are extremely superstitious with all sorts of rituals that they do; in an era where the belief in gods was the status quo, do you really think there were many people who would doubt them as a whole? They might not have been pious but I doubt there were many people who were what we would today call atheists.

99dbdd  No.12119463


>barely anyone racemixes

1/6 of all births are mixed race in america.

9757dc  No.12119535

File: 440c55a603000e9⋯.jpg (93.53 KB, 420x369, 140:123, 1234.jpg)


Shying away from the race question is dangerous at best and traitorous at worst. The rate of interracial marriages is going up and I don't see Christians preaching against it. They accept it, they encourage it, they rationalize it and normalize it. It is a huge problem and if not swiftly dealt with then the US has no future. The White race will die out, mixed into extinction but Christianity will still survive among spics, mutts and nogs.

60aca1  No.12119572


So atheism wasn't around just because most people weren't atheist? Do you know how retarded you sound?

c53627  No.12119628


THIS is pilpul by the way. You direct the conversation away from all the positives of Paster Anderson by focusing on the one thing and then making the conversation about that instead. Classic jewish tactics. I have never said anything about condoning race-mixing; what I have said is that Anderson is a great asset for us because he destroys jews from a religious perspective and even goes so far as to debunk the holocaust. That's huge. That's what I'm focusing on. You can keep picking on other issues and blowing them up so as to make it appear as if he is only bad - but we know your tricks my hook-nosed friend.


What are you on? The fact that a few people were atheists means nothing at all unless they had some good reasoning. You said that we had 'atheist brothers' and I told you took look at how atheism started up in the West (it was at the behest of jews), and now you're saying that you think that might have been some Greeks who were atheists? Even if they were it matters not because they never did anything; all the greatest warriors, poets, artists, politicians and philosophers believed in God/s. What does this even have to do with anything? - You brought it up because I said Anderson opposes atheism and implied that it was a good thing. Judging by the fact that the majority of atheists today are willing jew servants; I stand by that assessment. Again I am thinking this is pilpul as you try to bring up some debate about atheism in ancient Greece as if that is relevant to anything.

60aca1  No.12119669


>atheism was started up in the West at the behest of Jews

>despite the fact that it was around in the West before Jews were everywhere

Retard. It is relevant that there existed atheists in ancient greece or even before than as it refutes your bullshit assertion that it was cooked up recently by Jews.

>The majority of atheists today are willing Jew servants

The majority of people in general are willing Jew servants, regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof.

d83a41  No.12119784

File: dcebfb09a5e08f9⋯.jpg (14.82 KB, 283x178, 283:178, 650d55536c46d4d6246975c0a4….jpg)

File: d56e32245cc010e⋯.png (257.44 KB, 720x1280, 9:16, android apphurt.png)



>believing in a jewish religion


>being this butthurt


c53627  No.12119867


Pilpul. This leads the discussion into: What started 'atheism' in Greece? But then we haven't actually ascertained that 'atheism' as perceived by people today ever existed in Greece. Why should we even care about atheism? … You are using a throw-away comment about something that Pastor Anderson opposes, which the vast majority of /pol/ opposes, as a means of derailing the thread and turning it into a harmless thread about atheism in ancient greece as opposed to attacking jews, exposing them with assets like Anderson and waking our people up.

You are at best an idiot, but I'm near certain you are a jew. Be gone from here.

58498b  No.12120059


based post

60aca1  No.12120150


You are the one who wrongfully mentioned Pastor Anderson's opposition to atheism and framed it as a good thing. This is untenable.

>which the vast majority of /pol/ opposes

Wrong. The majority of imageboard users in general have historically been atheist/irreligious for years. And that includes /pol/.

bb829e  No.12120183


>Christians didn't just protect other Christians from Jewish slavery/mutilation

that's not because he was a christian, but because he was a good man despite being a Christian.

he's the exception that proves the cuck rule.

682d94  No.12120637


this post screams teenager

[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / fast / mde / scat / tacos / vg / vichan ]