The "BEZOS Act" would tax corporations for every dollar that their low-wage workers receive in government assistance.
>Sen. Bernie Sanders' criticism of Amazon peaked Wednesday as he and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., introduced legislation to tax corporations for every dollar that their low-wage workers receive in government health-care benefits or food stamps.
>The bill, pointedly called the Stop Bad Employers by Zeroing Out Subsidies, or BEZOS, Act, is aimed at shaming companies like Amazon and Walmart, whose workers rely on public assistance.
>For months, Sanders has targeted Amazon, juxtaposing the wealth of CEO Jeff Bezos with reports that Amazon warehouse workers are paid less than industry averages and rely on food stamps.
>Bezos is the richest man in the world, with a net worth of more than $168 billion.
>"Our legislation gives large, profitable employers a choice: Pay workers a living wage or pay for the public assistance programs their low-wage employees are forced to depend upon," Sanders said of the proposed law.
>For example, if an Amazon worker received $2,000 in food stamps, Amazon would be taxed $2,000 to cover that cost.
>Amazon has previously called the Vermont independent's claims about working conditions in its fulfillment centers "inaccurate and misleading" and a spokesperson declined to further comment on the bill.
This is good from a quick glance. Why the fuck are these kikes like broken clocks?
>Sanders finally wants to do something not completely stupid.
Broken clocks are an amazing thing.
>socialist proposes a business tax on the taxes businesses pay
Did you take influence from the last poster, or are you shills?
Also, nice get
Or, you know, tax speculative instruments when they reach a certain amount to encourage they place assets in things that benefit on the societal level and not just the financial level. Say, when a company is valued at $1 trillion mandate that it may not use 1099 contractors to do daily tasks essential to it's valuation and all employees must make 120% AMI. This ensures that no employee of said ultra rich company may live in assisted housing, receive material assistance, or otherwise be a drain on taxpayers - also ensures that subsidized housing is given to those who need it. Generally 120% AMI is enough to live comfortably wherever provided you don't piss your cash away. It's not a final solution but it's a step in the right direction more so than hurr tax for welfare use.
also fuck the minimum wage, that's for high school kids; pay living wages for hourly employees and institute a maximum wage for executives who get billions in stock options
Bezos is using his money to cure aging. Bernie Sanders is a deathist cuck.
>calling a kike as a broken clock is a shill
This is a good thing. (((Bezos))) needs to be put in his place.
That's cool, even better would be removing personal income taxes and VAT on non-luxury items on top of that.
also property and land taxes. Your property taxes shouldn't sky rocket because libshits voted for crap stuff.
Jeff Bezos is a Jew?
No, but he might as well be given that he banned books that tell the truth about what didn't happen during WWII.
>Can only come up with a solution that involves stealing more money
You have to be right at least once for that to apply
kek approves of Bernie, in this case.
Or you could just get rid of payroll tax AND get rid of all the socialism shit.
>tax corporations for every dollar that their low-wage workers receive in government assistance
I could get behind this is the money raised wouldn't just be used as niggerspic breeding subsidization.
>The bill, pointedly called the Stop Bad Employers by Zeroing Out Subsidies, or BEZOS, Act
wouldn't that be the SBEZOS act?
Here's the thing, these multimillion dollar corporations invest millions into symbolic virtue signalling (look at @WokeCapital to see what I'm talking). Why can't they spend millions into helping their own employees earn a living?
I would rather have them pay their employees than have them waste money into the gayest shit imaginable. Fuck those corps.
So if McFatties doesn't pay their burger flippers $20 an hour, McFatties gets taxed for gibs?
jew wants to double dip. shocking
Those corporations kind of have to at this point. Since there is no middle class any more to pay it.
Its a Berniebro fucktard invasion!
WE SHOULD KEEP GIBSMEDATS GOING, BUT LAY A HEAVY TAX ON ANY COMPANY THAT CAN'T REPLACE EMPLOYEES WITH WETBACKS AND ROBOTS! AND OF COURSE I'LL BE IN CHARGE OF COUNTING THE TAXES, GOYS! YOU CAN TRUST YOUR UNCLE BERNIE!
>Pay workers a living wage or pay for the public assistance programs their low-wage employees are forced to depend upon
I don't see any other mention of whether this tax revenue will indeed be dedicated to those very same programs.
Am I safe in assuming it is instead going to go into the general fund or to some other programs?
Uncle Boiney wants you to sit on his lap.
I wonder how quickly Amazon and Walmart would go out of business if it had to pay all the bills for the zoos and prisons their employees squalor in.
>LET CORPORATIONS SEND MILLIONS TO THE SPLC INSTEAD OF WORKERS, GOY
t. soyboy feminist from silicon valley
Classic shitlib policy. Go after the popular yet impossible target with no hope of success.
You know that old saying about broken clocks.
I was in the captcha at the time.
Maximum wage looks pretty good.
Flat rate sales tax as only tax, government would have to be a more careful with how much money they ask for if everything goes up by the same tax rate.
Payroll tax was always stupid and never should have been a thing, though this should really be more of a fine for making other workers and customers of these companies have to foot the bill (((they))) should be paying.
And take your underwears off.
On a side note: what ever became of Trump's ape-crates?
I was looking forward to delicious tears, but, no mention of it after the initial couple weeks of outrage.
fun fact, income taxes were supposed to tax gains from not working. Noticed it's not called a wage tax. We need to tax amazon and it's ilk back at 50's levels. those brutal taxes meant the larger and more monopolistic you got, the less incentive you had. Giving a chance for innovation and competition.
>tax at 50s levels
In the 1950s there wasn't (((globalization))) and (((international commerce))) yet anon, today companies move overseas if you tax them too high.
>a jew sees someone else with money
Sounds like communism to me.
Yeah - so he wants to tax these corporations so that they move out of the U.S.
bullshit globalization is just code word for slavery there were also customs duties and import taxes
Yank their charter and bar them from selling in the states, then. I'm pretty sure taxes don't go away if you operate in foreign markets, though. Having companies move overseas, and gutting the middle class etc., was part of the plan via abusive regulation.
Opportunistic commie. 'See the injustice of capitalism?' lets be like Venezuela now.
they already left. They use tax loopholes and other scams to avoid costs and max profits. Amazon can't move out. They are a retailer
they should not have an ounce of corporate protection. Liability exemption was for public benefits, thus they got a charter.
Amazon doesn't make a profit anyway. This is a typical bernie scam. They are a stock swindle. If they were treated as though we had laws against monopolistic behavior they wouldn't exist.
The problem is race, not fucking economics. Wake up. Whether it's communism or ancapism, the success of a nation is in its ability to work together.
>Bernie bros go after CIA's Amazon
>Bernie has a sudden heart attack
you miss the point, he is trying to double nothing. They don't pay taxes.
Wasn't there a push to privatize the USPS recently because of Amazon and Bezos abusing last mile delivery?
The USPS has legal protections for deliveries that private companies don't. Imagine a lefty company refusing to deliver your ammo or knife because you're not a baby killing faggot, or opening and scanning your mail for "advertising purposes" and putting your profile in a database.
The USPS, back when everyone was "going postal" got screwed by regulations the drained their budget to make market room for UPS and Fedex…
Bernie has nothing on the /pol/'s. If the Bern hasn't asked the /pol/'s for help in his quest, his adviser's should be fired now, mkay
kikes aren't exactly the smartest bunch
Yes, he is a crypto-kike.
>So if McFatties doesn't pay their burger flippers $20 an hour, McFatties gets taxed for gibs?
Like all taxes, small businesses will be the ones destroyed. (((Corporations))) will get all the best loopholes, waivers, and deferrals.
Taxing $1 for $1 is dumb. It equals out and doesn't really mean the company will pay more in wages. What would be better is taxing $2 for every $1, making it more expensive to not raise pay outside of qualification for services!
Woah, what kind of (((company))) would give up helping it's own society like that? I'm so "shocked" you'd assume such a thing you neocon ape tier subhuman.
If only he named it "freeze"
Squalor is not a verb.
But now it is. Love it.
As corporations are purely legal entities, created by and existing solely under the purview of a legal system, there is no reason why laws do not apply to them.
I see no problems with this.
I mean if someone is working full time or is prevented from having multiple jobs due to the terms of employment.
Then it is not unreasonable to expect the employer to pay to cover the costs of social welfare if said employment is not enough to live on.
Overall though a better option may be wage ratio caps in large companies.
So say guy at the top can only take home ten times what the guy on the bottom takes.
That way if he wants a pay rise then the guy at the bottom also has to have one.
UK has similar problems except the Royal Mail did get privatised.
Problem is they privatised it and shafted it.
It has to sell wholesale access to its sorting centres and delivery network.
Chances are if you've gotten a parcel in the UK then the delivery company have just picked it up from a Royal Mail sorting centre and delivered it from there.
The only exceptions on this front being shit like UPS who receive substantial US government subsidy to build their networks so that the CIA can use them to run drugs.
But though that wholesale access the Royal Mail has to sell? They can only charge less than it costs to provide it. Fucking them further.
>I see no problems with this.
Genocide through mass immigration is expensive since you are effectively dismantling the society that supports the welfare the shitskins rely upon to survive in the host society they are corroding. Bernie, who wants to kill all white people, realizes the need for more taxes so that the cost of the invasion can be met.
But you're taxing them the cost of providing their employees with welfare. Not more than that.
Since illegals can't legally work for them or claim welfare they aren't a factor here.
You're naive if you think illegals don't manage to gain welfare benefits while simultaneously working for a low wage.
True but thats a law enforcement matter and one Trump is no doubt keen to wade into.
>I see no problems with this.
This keeps money out of worker's hands. Why don't we just scrap wages altogether, and have employers pay the state your wages to redistribute to the completely welfare-dependent public?
So. While normies will cheer loudly let me give you an explanation of the results, provided this is as successful as it can be.
The most successful result of this:
Even more of the work is outsourced, even more people that are due a raise will be fired for the smallest legal reasons, more seasonal hiring (which usually escapes these types of "protection" laws), and as you guessed it, the real problem is not addressed.
You know the kikes went too far, when /pol/ is agreeing with Sanders. This shouldn't be an issue, but, companies have found a way to externalise employee cost, by using the gov't as copays, for their employees. If you look at Amazon's history you will see that they are probably the best when it comes to externalising costs to the communities they operate in.
Not that this is bad in itself, because they usually find a way to hack systems that haven't responded to new threats that groups like Amazon pose. For example, back when it started Amazon would order books, and since the book publishers had bookstores in mind, you had 3 months to repay the book, to give it time to sell.
well amazon would only order books they already had an order for and had that cash handy for 3 months. After a while the publishers got wiser.
Socialism has to exist in some form, because capitalism has a large incentive to fuck over workers. The interests of workers and the owners are both conflicting and symbiotic. It is a really strange relationship.
I am confused, I work for amazon part time and I make 13 an hour for five hours a day. FC workers make 15 an hour in the DFW area with raises, health care, and numerous other perks.
Amazon employees for instance get discounts for a lot of things like shoes, pet insurance, verizon, etc etc. Where are these low wages coming from?
> I work for amazon part time and I make 13 an hour for five hours a day.
Why only 5 a day? by choice, or is it Amazon trying to fill their warehouses with part timers of which they don't really have any legal obligations too?
This, "Bezos Act," may thwart corporate/economic growth and may influence corporations to either,
a.) remain outside the U.S., or
b.) Leave the U.S.
Bernie Sanders is a Communist and a Bolshevik.
He is not to be trusted under any circumstances.
>b.) Leave the U.S.
wew lad, this occured a long time ago. Basically socialism in the US funded China. Ban minimum wages, and accept the evils of capitalism or else it will find a way to bite you in the ass. I think noble oblige could compensate for the power imbalance that capitalists have, but, in order to have that you need ethnic cohesion. Can't really work with kikes in the mix.
We are a delivery station that is fairly new, besides management it is all part time, although I can not work more than that due to other obligations. They do not want to pay full time benefits however, this is due to apparently delivery stations do not make a whole lot of money, but helps cut out the middle man of ups and usps.
the image also looks like 6 people doing group anal
wtf is wrong with kikes?
LMAOing @ all these berniebros whining about #Baste capitalism. Judeo-neoliberalism is what makes America great.
I don't see where this is bad. What are they going to do? Raise their prices? That undermines the entire function of their business, which is to undercut competition at unrealistic prices to put them out of business. I mean, there's obviously better ways of going about this, but this is a better-than-nothing step, which is surprising because it's coming from some dirty old bolshevik kike. Then again, the government wants money wherever it can get it. So long as they're taxing them and not us. Companies like amazon and walmart literally can't do anything about it besides lay off employees or raise prices, and both hurt their business model by stifling their competitiveness, when that, not service, are what they strive for. Now let's aim to get rid of the illegal beaners and lock up the border, as well as more heavily institute tariffs, so American workers have a stronger platform to argue from, being more in demand. Also let's decrease regulations and taxation and open the market back up so small businesses can compete. At the end of the day, this is a better-than-nothing move, but it literally changes nothing for the rest of us. As a matter of fact they'll probably just put a team of lawyers on it, and you know who'll end up paying the price? Small local businesses. As usual. After all, every regulation the dems. put into place hurts small businesses.
>delivery stations do not make a whole lot of money,
only thing that makes money at Amazon is the fat govt contracts with Amazon web hosting. Amazon has always run at a loss, and still does, except for that profitable division. Others make tiny profits, but, they don't justify the stock price.
Socialism is a system. Single elements like having a minimum wage, or 5/6 day work week etc. are not socialism. Stop attributing shit to socialism. You either are socialist or you're not. There's no in between. A single element of a political or economic system is not solely and eternally attributed to that system, especially not one as new as socialism. Many so-called "socialist" ideals existed before socialism, and independently are not socialist ideals, but ideals socialists utilize. Fuck off. I'm sick this stupid shit.
Right off the bat he pretends like the Testimonium Flavianum is authentic. How big-brained do you have to be to think that Josephus—who held notoriously anti-Christian beliefs until his death—was a Christian that referred to Yeshua bar Josef as a Messiah?
something I can actually agree with "breadline Bernie" about; at least at face value. Mega Corps should not have the power they do. They should not be wage slaving America.
I am pretty firm in my belief that happiness and freedom should come from small business. Although, increasingly, most goblino Americans lack the mental fortitude to provide for themselves in the information age. Still, I don't think we should although mega corps to exploit them.
The guise is really wearing off. The united states is really started to show it's corrupt empire status. It's becoming clear what a banana republic we are for kike printing presses around the world. Mega Corps are only on their side. Not the peoples.
I've had a drink or two and I want off this ride.
>minimum wage, or 5/6 day work week etc. are not socialism
Black or white thinking, to prove your points. You can have socialist policies, thus socialist elements. It is not full blown social but it is socialist in nature.
and socialist elements, do lead to SOCIALISM. Snowball effect. polite sage for you being a nigger loving faggot nigger dyke.
So is this a national socialist board or not?
Nope, this is a neoliberal civnat board. Go back to Ironmarch, LARPing faggot.
It is now. Used to be fascist but now that the normalfags (untermesnch) invaded it is a socialist board.
Death to socialists, long live elitism!
isn't China a natsoc country? think about it.
At a glance, it seems like a surprisingly not terrible idea, but I can't help but feel there's more too it. It's a too good to be true sort of thing, and I only fear that I'm not smart enough to see the trap.
Consider this… Two workers work the same job and make the same (or very close) pay. One (we'll call them A) recieves government benefits (due to having children, for example), the other (called B) does not. Under Sanders' proposal, the employer would now essentially be footing the bill for A's paycheck and welfare benefits. B would gain nothing he didn't already have and isn't likely to get a raise for pointing this out.
The entire system is fucked, and I don't see the BEZOS Act doing anything to fix the underlying problem.
>When people are abundant, labor is cheap.
>When labor is cheap, pay is low.
>When pay is low, responsible (white) people are less likely to do things that cost a lot of money like starting a family.
>This should result in a lowering population, which in turn makes labor more scarce and thus more valuable and the while thing is cyclical
>Instead, we import hordes of smelly, brown third worlders who increase the pool of workers further, driving down the value of labor and in turn wages even more.
>This is why the middle class is dying.
No it's not. There's no "socialist element." There's socialism and not socialism. Elements of socialism are not inherently socialist unless part of a socialist system. Stop trying to spread your stupid fucking ideology by labeling everything you think is decent as socialist.
Case in point, the policy differences between National Socialism and Marxist Socialism. There's no such thing as a "socialist policy" unless it's a part of a socialist system.
muh absolutism. Okay define precisely when a country becomes socialist and when it isn't. You got a line in the sand? I just see a sliding scale retard.
>this is a neoliberal civnat board
>Used to be fascist but now that the normalfags (untermesnch) invaded it is a socialist board.
I've been here probably longer then both of you faggots, and I don't think either of these views are correct.
>this is a neoliberal civnat board
I hope this is fucking bait. Otherwise you need to rethink your fucking life. I know for a fact this board is not ready(or happy) to pay the tax man for goblinos nationwide. Especially when we live in a ZOG banana republic.
I wish I knew more to answer this question correctly. That thought often crosses my mind. They certainly have a lot in common. Probably their biggest difference is philosophical. I doubt the Chinese governments commitment to the people, and to honor. China probably would be relieved to have millions of Chinese die off in whatever fashion. They also have a severe lack of respect for nature and the natural world. They literally are poisoning the majority of their population to produce dollar store throw away trinkets. The Nazi's would not do that.
China's exploitation and colonization of Africa is probably their most impressive feat. They are taking the best methods of colonization and financial dependence to own that continent. I can only hope they plan to exterminate African niggers with extreme prejudice. Or a tleast make them all Hapa china niggas.
>>When people are abundant, labor is cheap.
>when you have a system that needs infinite growth so you double your labour force, set up colonies in foreign countries and import even more migrants just to keep growing in order to pay your debts and shareholders.
So… Give big companies incentive to fire their workers and switch to illegal slave labor? How could this possibly go wrong?
When a government is instituted that propagates policies that, together, create a socialist system. A mixed economy is "part socialism, part capitalism." That's fucking retarded. How the fuck can a policy be socialist when it existed before socialism? Fucking explain that.
A mixed economy isn't*
The "trap" is probably, like with many of their regulations, to put the remaining local mom and pop shops out of business. I would wager many of them pay very little, due to having a relatively small market, and thus this extra out-of-pocket cost would put them under, allowing the giants with teams of lawyers and bottomless wallets to sweep in and take their small cut of the pie. When has a democrat regulation not hurt small business?
Unfortunately, I think all bets are off for having any economic system having a morsel of logic when Jewish printing presses are the basis for the global economy. Really it's too late to eliminate fiat and flip the system to start making sense. Demographics alone prevent that from happening. Not to mention the other bullshit strangleholds on our economy. So much of U.S. GDP is literal abstract finance horseshit. No I think this Banana Republic is going to chug along paying graft to all the bosses, until goblinos nationwide vote in socialism. Then we go broke and jew bankers get all the U.S. government owned lands. Hopefully, at that point there are enough white people around to start loading magazines. Honestly, I am looking at getting Hungarian Citizenship. Hopefully, we can get some white persons egg banks setup.
Sanders is right on this. Amazon is like the retail Borg, and its warehouses are festering cesspools of immigrant workers. If its made non-advantageous to hire easy to exploit foreign workers, then companies would be more likely to prefer a more reliable White worker over a non-White exploitable one.
>implying they aren't already switching
How the fuck did you find your way in here?
HOLY YES. The robots are coming. Replace all the Jew politicians with robots and they won't stand a chance. None of that white man innovation for Jews.
you wouldn't do that for a grammatical error, would you?
So are you a member of Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, or Council on Foreign relations?
>companies have found a way to externalise employee cost
They have been doing this for a long time with the educational system, as well. By changing the curriculum, they offloaded employee training to schools, which are subsidized by the gov't in the form of student loans, and totally unlawful property tax funded public schools. You're no longer educated in schools, you're trained to be good little compliant corporate worker bee.
>Socialism has to exist in some form
This is not true, laws and regulations should reflect Christian values, like not stealing, lying, being greedy or taking advantage of "loopholes" in the law to screw people over. The legal right to make a profit doesn't excuse any kind of abusive behavior, but socialism is institutionalized theft, and is worse than the problem it tries to solve.
Bezos is an extremely greedy and ruthless businessman, like Soros, Gates, Ellison, Buffett, et. al.. They seem to follow the nihilistic values implied from the Darwinian evolution lie, behaving like some lunatic monster where only the strong survive and the only merit is seen in being able to kill any competition, being as big and as strong as possible, and staying on top for as long as possible.
They have no problem abusing the ability to lobby congress for laws that will benefit them financially, or paying for protesters to hamper politics in their financial favor. Buffett interfered with oil pipelines being built in order to increase profits with his trains by forcing oil to be transported there, which in turn raises the price of oil/energy/manufacturing for everyone.
States and congress should not just sit there and let them abuse the system, but they're bought off by the K street goons, who actually write the laws. That's part of the reason why the border is still wide open; millions of trespassers and h1/2b visas and 1st gen immigrants are still here, driving the country into the ground. Cheap, compliant, good little worker bees with no loyalty to the country and no Christian ethics or morals to get in the way.
>you wouldn't do that for a grammatical error, would you?
The fact that you still don't recognize your mistake reasserts that you need to begone.
>get rid of all the socialism shit.
Like the national one?
I think my post made it clear that I knew it wasn't a grammatical error you were upset with. You faggots are worse then leftists half the time with your hair fucking trigger. Surely, I wasn't using the word "nazi" in a derogatory fashion. I mean, do you really want a national socialist government with 50% goblino primes anyway? Or do you plan to somehow eliminate 50% of the population? Good luck with that faggot. INB4 "black pilled faggot"
Stop restarting your router, it's pretty obvious which retard you are.
The infographic is irrelevant to the topic. Amazon already spends virtually all of its profits on all that stuff to avoid paying taxes.
There was a time on /pol/ when the infographics were grand-slam homers, at once an eye-full of information, insight, deeply researched data and counter-narrative arguments you could hit your liberal auntie at Thanksgiving dinner with. Sadly, Pol is full of people calling out shills, kikes, niggers and so on and so forth. Such politically incorrect jibber-jabber is only politically incorrect at the surface level. And this is one way you might know that this area has been somewhat compromised.
That said, Let's dip our toes into this topic, a little. Socialism is Jewish and therefore bad.
But isn't Capitalism is also Jewish? It seems to me the richest Jews are capitalist to the extreme.
What's so Jewish about Capitalism? Well, what the hell is capitalism? Capitalism is the idea that capital (money [seems obvious, but at one time money wasn't as standardized as it is today]) can be risked for a stake in a given company's success or failure. In a way, capitalism (broadly applauded in the west but practiced only by a few) is a kind of middle-ground between monarchy and a merit based system. Rich people can invest in a company which seems as though it might succeed.
Now, what kind of people would prefer to make their money by guessing the best? Making the best predictions, and not by rolling up their sleeves? Jews?
And when we say Jews sometimes, we are referring to our basest self. I'm not playing down my anti-antisemitism, I'm merely un-boogeymanning a concept. This is as important as anti- or counter-semitism, as it can help root out those character qualities in your person.
Now, considering this Bezos bill, It has the veneer of economic soundness. It makes sense in a way that requires no research, no double-checking, no proof, it must appeal immediately to its audience.
Who is that? Who wants to see 2+2=4 in their newspaper, and would prefer not to have to check things out?
sub-90 IQ people.
Considering all the goals, ramifications of this bill, what would be the most just? Restructuring the pay-scale of the company according to their profits. (Oh Gawd if this were to ever happen at the NYT oh gawd)
This is what this bill is intended to do. It's intended to disrupt a highly successful business's practices and take their money for social programs.
What would Bernie Sanders say or do if Amazon were to adjust their payscale?
would this be an effective way of calling his bluff?
If we could take Bernie Sanders at his naive word, we could assume that everywhere an amazon factory exists, the cost of living is the same. is that the fault of Amazon? This is just one point that I thought I'd make before I see more sycophantic cheering of his idea, which seems to appeal to NatSocs on principle, but is really a wide net being cast, intended to scrape up those who are NatSocs in principle, only , as well as those who are genetically predisposed to gibs programs.
Don't fall for it!
Ah, sadly it's too late for that.
Rip in pieces bungie
Yeah and how many additional billions did Amazon reap from the Trump™ 2017 tax cuts?
Fun fact: After six months in office the Trump administration has cut penalties levied by federal agencies on financial firms by two thirds. Fines against banks for the first six months of 2016 were $1.4 billion, while fines for the same period in 2017 were down to $489 billion.
If Orange Fool Aid was ever going to really drain the swamp he wouldn't have formed a cabinet filled with corporate and financial CEOs, career bureaucrats, and CFR, Bilderberg, Atlantic Council and Trilateral Commission members.
If Socialism and Capitalism are such opposites, it shouldn't be possible for economic power to challenge political power in a socialist country. And that might be a big part of the system's design. The big problem with this, in my opinion, is that it doesn't take international economy into account. For instance, how is it that big business from capitalist countries can influence politics in socialist countries?
This is an attempt by Bernie to reclaim his bros that defected into NatSoc both publicly and in meta-political chambers like the chans.
It will fail.
If it isn't white; it's not right.
it gets thrown off a cliff
And he'll have even more incentive to either fire them, replace low wage workers with robots or do some other thing that will hurt the worker.
One thing this commie should learn is that corporations will always find a way to circumvent government regulation.
The trick is to get workers off benefits and food stamps altogether by getting spics out of the nation, stop the kikes from robbing the people through inflation and destroy the FED.
Quads + logic = truth
1516 2nd Ave
Seattle WA 98101-1543
Neighborhood: Downtown Seattle
PO Box 907
Bellevue, WA 98009-0907
DOWN WITH BEZOS
they'll lay off the low income workers pushing them even further onto welfare, resulting in another excuse to push for universal basic income
they'll just lay them off forcing them onto welfare resulting in more democrat voters
lmao no, but FedEx on the other hand…
>what is balkanization
Nice job broadcasting your newfaggotry as well.
I can't tell if I should be happy that amazon is getting shat on or sad that bernie is getting good boy points for doing it.
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
>The "BEZOS Act" would tax corporations for every dollar that their low-wage workers receive in government assistance.
Holy fuck this is a good idea.
No you don't get it tard. This makes all corporations HATE immigrants. Whites suddenly become much more attractive because they use less welfare even at same poverty level.
OR it will incentivize them to hire illegals instead and pay them under the table.
Which is why you need to make the penalties for hiring illegals extremely steep. And then actually enforce the law.
Yeah, but do you HONESTLY think that's going to happen?
I hope you're right anon, I really do. I just don't have as much faith as you do I guess.